Facilitating the transition to residency: A resident-as-coach pilot program.

BACKGROUND: The transition from medical school to residency is a critical developmental phase; coaching may help students prepare for this role transition. AIMS: We explored whether near-peer coaching could improve a specific workplace skill prior to residency. METHODS: A resident-as-coach program was piloted for the medicine sub-internship, an advanced acting internship rotation. Between March and June 2021, 26 students were assigned a resident coach (n = 16). Resident coaches completed one training session, and student-coach dyads met for one coaching session on 'pre-rounding'- gathering patient data before rounds. The program was evaluated through surveys and focus groups. RESULTS: 20/26 students and 14/16 residents completed the survey. 19/20 students identified a pre-rounding challenge and reported increased pre-rounding efficiency; all committed to one actionable step for improvement. All 16 residents felt their coaching skills improved. In focus groups, students valued the program's focus on honing a relevant skill in a safe, near-peer setting. Residents expressed their intent to incorporate coaching into their future work. CONCLUSIONS: A resident-as-coach model can be effective in preparing students for residency, while concurrently building residents' coaching skills.

Roles and Responsibilities of Medicine Subinternship Directors : Medicine Subinternship Director Roles.

BACKGROUND: The internal medicine (IM) subinternship (also referred to as acting internship) plays a crucial part in preparing medical students for residency. The roles, responsibilities, and support provided to subinternship directors have not been described. OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe the current role of IM subinternship directors with respect to their responsibilities, salary support, and reporting structure. DESIGN: Nationally representative, annually recurring thematic survey of IM core clerkship directors with membership in an academic professional association as of September 2017. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 129 core clinical medicine clerkship directors at Liaison Committee on Medical Education fully accredited U.S./U.S.-territory-based medical schools. MAIN MEASURES: Responsibilities, salary support, and reporting structure of subinternship directors. KEY RESULTS: The survey response rate was 83.0% (107/129 medical schools). Fifty-one percent (54/107) of respondents reported overseeing both core clerkship inpatient experiences and/or one or more subinternships. For oversight, 49.1% (28/53) of subinternship directors also reported that they were the clerkship director, 26.4% (14/53) that another faculty member directed all medicine subinternships, and 18.9% (10/53) that each subinternship had its own director. The most frequently reported responsibilities for the subinternship directors were administration, including scheduling, and logistics of student schedules (83.0%, 44/53), course evaluation (81.1%, 43/53), and setting grades 79.2% (42/53). The modal response for estimated FTE per course was 10-20% FTE, with 33.3% (16/48) reporting this level of support and 29.2% (14/54) reporting no FTE support. CONCLUSIONS: The role of the IM subinternship director has become increasingly complex. Since the IM subinternship is critical to preparing students for residency, IM subinternship directors require standard expectations and adequate support. Future studies are needed to determine the appropriate level of support for subinternship directors and to define essential roles and responsibilities.

Virtual Interactions and the 2020-2021 Residency Application Cycle in General Surgery: A Look Ahead.

INTRODUCTION: General surgery residency training programs adapted to the COVID-19 pandemic by going online instead of in-person, through virtual interviews, social media engagement, and virtual open houses. The impact of these virtual interactions is unknown. We sought to understand their effectiveness as per residency program directors and assistant program directors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An institutional review board approval was obtained to conduct this anonymous survey. A Qualtrics XM survey containing multiple-choice and short-answer questions was distributed to 590 residency program and assistant program directors through the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS) listserv on July 6, July 13, and July 20. RESULTS: We observed a response rate of approximately 11% across the 590 surgeons contacted. Nearly all (90%) respondents offered virtual preinterview interactions, primarily virtual open houses, virtual facility tours, and virtual question and answer (Q&A) sessions with residents and faculty; 48% of respondents were unsure of the utility of virtual interactions and the majority (54%) felt that virtual interaction limits a program's ability to evaluate applicants. Virtual Q&As were ranked to be the most effective interaction (7.6/10); 80% of respondents felt that visiting rotations were "somewhat important" to "very important," the two highest options available. In addition, 74% felt that applicants missed out on fully experiencing the program by forgoing these rotations. Most respondents (78%) noted that evaluation of applicants' preinterview did not change as a result of virtual interactions. Nearly half (48%) of the respondents offered more interview days due to the virtual format. A fifth (21%) of respondents stated that virtual interactions resulted in a change in the rank position of an applicant. Respondents ranked Twitter and Instagram higher in applicant engagement than Facebook. Factors that impacted interview or rank order list the most were late/absent step two CK scores (33%) and a lack of away rotations (31%), both being limitations largely due to the pandemic. With respect to future application cycles, most (71%) raised concerns regarding disparities between applicants applying in-person and virtually if both or either are offered. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that program directors and associate program directors have reservations about the use of virtual interactions with applicants. Interestingly, these data suggest that visiting subinternships are useful for programs in evaluating applicants. This may encourage students to pursue rotations at other institutions at the expense of already-limited resources. It remains unclear whether virtual interactions will be used in the future, but respondents largely agreed that the virtual means of interacting with and disseminating information to the applicants of the 2020-2021 general surgery Match were a success.

Teaching through the screen: a toolbox for creating a virtual neurosurgical subinternship program.

OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic disrupted the landscape of traditional neurosurgical subinternships, ramifications of which persist to this day. The outright cancellation of in-person subinternships in 2020 presented not only a challenge to both applicants and programs, but also an opportunity to establish an effective and efficient platform for virtual neurosurgical training. To address this need, the authors designed and trialed a novel virtual neurosurgical subinternship (Virtual Sub-I). METHODS: The weeklong, case-based Virtual Sub-I program combined flipped-classroom and active learning approaches. Students worked in small groups to discuss neurosurgical cases. Faculty and residents offered personalized mentorship sessions to participants. Surveys were used to assess students' experience with the authors' subinternship program, consistent with level 1 of the Kirkpatrick model. RESULTS: A total of 132 students applied from both international and American medical schools. The final cohort comprised 27 students, of whom 8 (30%) were female and 19 (70%) were male. Students characterized the subinternship as "interactive," "educational," and "engaging." One hundred percent of survey respondents were "very likely" to recommend the Virtual Sub-I to their peers. Faculty involved in the Virtual Sub-I stated that the program allowed them to determine the fit of participating medical students for their neurosurgery residency program, and that information gathered from the Virtual Sub-I had the potential to influence their ranking decisions. CONCLUSIONS: The Virtual Sub-I recapitulates the educational and interpersonal benefits of the traditional subinternship experience and can serve as a prototype for future virtual surgical education endeavors. Furthermore, the Virtual Sub-I presents a more equitable platform for introducing medical students across the undergraduate medical education spectrum to neurosurgical education and mentorship.

Comparison of OSCE performance between 6- and 7-year medical school curricula in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: The year 2013 marks a watershed in the history of medical education in Taiwan. Following Taiwan's Taskforce of Medical School Curriculum Reform recommendations, the medical school curriculum was reduced from 7 to 6 years. This study aimed to analyze the impact of medical school curriculum reform on medical students' performance in objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the OSCE records at Taipei Veterans General Hospital (Taipei VGH), one of Taiwan's largest tertiary medical centers, between November 2016 and July 2020. The eligibility criteria were medical students receiving a full one-year clinical sub-internship training at Taipei VGH and in their last year of medical school. All medical students received a mock OSCE-1 at the beginning of their sub-internship, a mock OSCE-2 after six months of training, and a national OSCE at the end of their sub-internship. The parameters for performance in OSCEs included "percentage of scores above the qualification standard" and "percentage of qualified stations." RESULTS: Between November 2016 and July 2020, 361 undergraduates underwent clinical sub-internship training at Taipei VGH. Among them, 218 were taught under the 7-year curriculum, and 143 were instructed under the 6-year curriculum. Based on baseline-adjusted ANCOVA results, medical students under the 7-year curriculum had a higher percentage of scores above the qualification standard than those under the 6-year curriculum at the mock OSCE-1 (7-year curriculum vs. 6-year curriculum: 33.8% [95% CI 32.0-35.7] vs. 28.2% [95% CI 25.9-30.4], p < 0.001), and mock OSCE-2 (7-year curriculum vs. 6-year curriculum: 89.4% [95% CI 87.4-91.4] vs. 84.0% [95% CI 81.5-86.4], p = 0.001). Moreover, medical students in the 7-year curriculum had a higher percentage of qualified stations in mock OSCE-1 (7-year curriculum vs. 6-year curriculum: 89.4% [95% CI 87.4-91.4] vs. 84.0% [95% CI 81.5-86.4], p = 0.001) and mock OSCE-2 (7-year curriculum vs. 6-year curriculum: 91.9% [95% CI 90.1-93.8] vs. 86.1% [95% CI 83.8-88.3], p = 0.001). After clinical sub-internship training, there were no differences in the percentage of scores above the qualification standard (7-year curriculum vs. 6-year curriculum: 33.5% [95% CI 32.2-34.9] vs. 34.6 [95% CI 32.9-36.3], p = 0.328) and percentage of qualified stations (7-year curriculum vs. 6-year curriculum: 89.4% [95% CI 88.1-90.7] vs. 90.2% [95% CI 88.6-91.8], p = 0.492). CONCLUSIONS: At the beginning of the sub-internship, medical students under the 7-year curriculum had better OSCE performance than those under the 6-year curriculum. After the clinical sub-internship training in Taipei VGH, there was no difference in the national OSCE score between the 6- and 7-year curricula. Our study suggests that clinical sub-internship is crucial for the development of clinical skills and performance in the national OSCE.

Away Rotation Applications in Emergency Medicine: Medical Student Behaviors, Outcomes, and Stressors.

BACKGROUND: Completing an emergency medicine (EM) away rotation is integral to matching successfully into an EM residency program. The demand for EM away rotations (ARs) drives students to submit numerous applications without evidence-based recommendations to guide stakeholders on the approach or number to submit. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a survey study of EM-bound fourth-year medical students to gain insight into their AR application experiences, outcomes, and perceptions. METHODS: We distributed a 40-item questionnaire to EM applicants in Fall 2018 via e-mail through the Clerkship Directors in Emergency Medicine, Council of Residency Directors in EM, and Emergency Medicine Residents' Association listservs. Responses were evaluated using quantitative and qualitative analysis. Primary outcomes were the number of AR applications submitted and AR offers received by students. Secondary outcomes were students' self-assessment of their competitiveness, differences in AR application numbers by degree type, sources of student advising, and student perceptions of the AR application process. RESULTS: There were 253 respondents, consisting of 192 allopathic (MD) and 61 osteopathic (DO) medical students, who met the inclusion criteria, representing about 10% of the applicant pool. On average, students submitted 13.97 applications (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.59-16.35), received 3.25 offers (95% CI 3.01-3.49), and accepted 2.22 offers (95% CI 2.08-2.36). DO candidates submitted twice as many applications as MD candidates while experiencing a similar rate of offers received. Peer influence (n = 154, 61%), peer online advising networks (n = 83, 33%), and self-assessment (n = 114, 45%) were the most often reported causes of increased applications; cost (n = 104, 41%) and geographic limitations (n = 114, 45%) were the most often reported causes of decreased applications. Open-response analysis revealed frustration with lack of standardization (n = 44, 29.5%), insufficient transparency on available positions (n = 37, 24.8%), limited communication (n = 30, 20.1%), and cost (n = 12, 8.1%). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that, as a whole, students received one away rotation offer for every four to five applications submitted. It clarified factors contributing to increased EM away rotation application submissions and associated stressors inherent in the application experience. Our findings offer insights to inform advising recommendations. They also suggest that stakeholders consider standardizing the process and improve communication over spot availability and application status.

A proposed model for a comprehensive virtual subinternship in vascular surgery.

OBJECTIVE: In the present study, we sought to understand the challenges, advantages, and applications of a vascular surgery virtual subinternship (VSI) curriculum. METHODS: Our institution hosted 25 students for two 4-week VSI rotations, one in July 2020 and one in August 2020. The students participated in a curriculum centered around the use of Zoom and telephone interactions with residents and faculty. The curriculum included selected readings, surgical videos, group didactics, and one-on-one mentorship. Anonymous pre- and postrotation self-assessments were used to ascertain the students' achievement of the learning objectives and the utility of the educational tools implemented during the rotation. The faculty and resident mentors were also surveyed to assess their experience. RESULTS: With the exception of knot-tying techniques (P = .67), the students reported significant improvement in their understanding of vascular surgery concepts after the virtual elective (P < .05). The highest ranked components of the course were interpersonal, including interaction with faculty, mentorship, and learning the program culture. The lowest ranked components of the course were simulation training and research opportunities. The rating of the utility of aspects of the course were consistent with the ranking of the components, with faculty interaction receiving the highest average rating. The ideal amount of time for daily virtual interaction reported by the students ranged from 3 to 6 hours (median, 4 hours). Overall, most of the mentors were satisfied with the virtual course. However, they reported limited ability to assess the students' personality and fit for the program. The time spent per week by the mentors on the virtual vascular surgery rotation ranged from 2 to 7 hours (median, 4 hours). Of the 17 mentors completing the surveys, 14 reported that having a virtual student was a significant addition to their existing workload. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our student and mentor feedback was positive. Several challenges inherent to the virtual environment still require refinement. However, the goals of a VSI are distinct and should be explored by training programs. With changes to healthcare in the United States on the horizon and the constraints resulting from the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic, implementing a virtual away rotation could be an acceptable platform in our adaptations of our recruitment strategies.

Virtual Rotations During COVID-19: An Opportunity for Enhancing Diversity.

The COVID-19 pandemic has presented unique challenges to medical education. With the lack of in-person away rotations for the 2020-2021 residency application cycle, virtual rotations have surfaced as an alternative. The virtual rotations that the authors participated in allowed for active participation in various resident educational activities such as journal club, grand rounds, and morning conferences. One critical aspect of virtual rotations was the one-on-one meetings with the program leadership. In addition to a virtual tour of the hospital and campus, many programs offered virtual social hours with the residents to converse about the program, the city, and the match process. A few programs even allowed applicants to attend virtually live-streamed surgeries. These rotations offer students, especially those without a corresponding home program, an invaluable opportunity to express their interest in a particular program and gain foundational knowledge about the specialty. Virtual rotations also provide underrepresented minorities and international medical graduates with clinical exposure, mentorship, and networking opportunities, mitigating some of the challenges presented by COVID-19.

The New Internal Medicine Subinternship Curriculum Guide: a Report from the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine.

The internal medicine (IM) subinternship has been a long-established clinical experience in the final phase of medical school deemed by key stakeholders as a crucial rotation to prepare senior medical students for internship. Medical education has changed greatly since the first national curriculum for this course was developed in 2002 by the Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine (CDIM). Most notably, competency-based medical education (CBME) has become a fixture in graduate medical education and has gradually expanded into medical school curricula. Still, residency program directors and empirical studies have identified gaps and inconsistencies in knowledge and skills among new interns. Recognizing these gaps, the Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine (APDIM) surveyed its members in 2010 and identified four core skills essential for intern readiness. The Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) also published 13 core entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for entering residency to be expected of all medical school graduates. Results from the APDIM survey along with the widespread adoption of CBME informed this redesign of the IM subinternship curriculum. The authors provide an overview of this new guide developed by the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine (AAIM) Medical Student-to-Resident Interface Committee (MSRIC).

Senior student goal setting during subinternship: a mixed-methods study.

BACKGROUND: New developments in Subinternship curricula attempt to establish self-directed learning skills that will translate into the 1st year of residency. However, we know little about how well senior medical students' self-directed learning goals match with what is expected of them in residency. PURPOSES: We designed a mixed-methods study to examine the goals set by senior students at Georgia Health Sciences University on Pediatric Subinternship and to determine how those goals relate to the 6 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) competencies. METHODS: We used an iterative process to categorize self-directed learning goals on Pediatric Subinternships (n=188 goals generated by 57 senior students) by (a) the 6 ACGME competencies and (b) general or specific goals. We used tests of association and multivariate modeling to compare goal categories by clinical site and time of year. RESULTS: There were 56.3% of goals addressing patient care. Professionalism and systems-based practice goals were rare. Of the goals, 72% were general, but goals written by students at the newborn nursery and neonatal intensive care unit sites were significantly more likely to be specific than goals written by students on the general inpatient subinternship. CONCLUSIONS: The overwhelming majority of senior medical student goals on a Pediatric Subinternship are general and related to patient care. Students may need assistance with developing more specific goals in all 6 competencies. Our findings suggest that understanding and incorporating students' learning goals may be important for enhancing the potential effectiveness of transition-to-residence curricula.

What Do Pediatric Subinterns Say About Their Learning and Assessment? A Qualitative Analysis of Individual Learning Plans.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a qualitative content analysis of learning and assessment strategies that pediatric subinterns describe in Individualized Learning Plans (ILPs) and to explore barriers and facilitators to their learning. METHODS: We analyzed ILPs from medical students enrolled in pediatric subinternships at 10 US medical schools that utilized a standardized curriculum and were recruited to reflect diversity in geographic location, funding, and enrollment. Students used an ILP to record 3 or more selected learning objectives, rationale for selection, and reflection on learning and assessment strategies. Investigators used the constant comparative method to perform a content analysis of the ILPs, grouping codes into themes, and verifying relationships between codes within themes. RESULTS: Two hundred and four ILPs that included student reflections on 850 learning objectives were analyzed. Content was analyzed in 5 categories: rationale for selecting objectives, learning strategies, assessment strategies, challenges to learning, and facilitators of learning. Students showed strong commitment to individualized, self-directed learning, developed a wide range of creative learning strategies, and relied heavily on self-reflection to assess their progress. The learning environment both helped and hindered students' ability to make and assess progress on their selected learning objectives. CONCLUSIONS: Through ILP-guided reflection and a formal curriculum, students can choose well-justified learning objectives and demonstrate resourcefulness and independence in developing self-directed learning and assessment strategies. The strategies that students identified in this study provide a menu of learning and assessment options for subinterns. Identified challenges and facilitators of learning provide guidance for educators who seek to enhance the clinical learning environment.

Otolaryngology Away Subinternships: An Analysis of the Application Process and Survey of Current Applicants' Perspectives.

Objective: To assess the availability and uniformity of application information for away subinternships and survey 4th-year medical students on their experiences obtaining away subinternships in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OHNS) during the 2022 to 2023 application cycle. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Online survey. Methods: The Association of American Medical College's Visiting Student Learning Opportunities (VSLO) program was queried for information on OHNS away subinternship applications. A survey assessing 4th-year medical students' perceptions of the away subinternship application process was distributed via OHNS residency program directors and Otomatch. Results: Of 129 OHNS residency programs, 103 (80%) offered away subinternship opportunities on VSLO. Variability in application release dates (January 18 to June 3, 2022), offer release dates (January 27 to August 7, 2022), and estimated cost ($22-$5500) were found. The most common application requirements were a transcript (98.1%) and a CV/resume (90.3%). There were 64 survey respondents, for a 13% response rate. The most common concerns include applying to too few programs (80%) and not knowing offer release dates (77%). The most common stressors include choosing a number of programs to which to apply (48%) and cost (35%). The majority (76%) reported difficulty finding updated information on program websites. Among the proposed changes, the greatest support was found for having all applications on VSLO (88%), uniform application release date (84%), and uniform application requirements (82%). Conclusion: The OHNS away subinternship application process is a significant source of anxiety for medical students due to the tremendous variability in application and acceptance procedures. Having all applications on VSLO, uniform application requirements, and uniform application opening and offer release dates would better facilitate this process.

OrthoACCESS: Implementing a Sub-Internship Curriculum for MS4s Applying to Orthopaedic Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Medical students pursuing orthopedic surgery residency build foundational knowledge during clinical rotations. Most clinical rotations, home and away, were paused during the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the lack of structured fourth-year medical student (MS4) education for basic orthopedics, educators developed the Ortho Acting-Intern Coordinated Clinical Education and Surgical Skills (OrthoACCESS) curriculum in 2019. This study demonstrates the accessibility and usability of a MS4 virtual orthopedic curriculum and examines the curriculum's role in increasing learner familiarity with basic orthopedic topics in 2020. DESIGN: OrthoACCESS faculty presented weekly lectures from July to October 2020 using Zoom Webinar. Website content included recorded webinars, external resources, and skills videos. Registrants were anonymously surveyed after each webinar characterizing the knowledge and utility of individual lectures. After the webinar series, registrants were emailed an anonymous post-curriculum survey characterizing their experience using the OrthoACCESS curriculum. RESULTS: OrthoACCESS had 1062 registrants, with 59% (624/1,062) MS4s. 4528 users accessed the OrthoACCESS website from 66 countries. The 15 lectures were viewed 3743 times, 1553 live views and 2190 asynchronous views. 444 postwebinar surveys were completed. Weekly response rates ranged from 18% to 45%. Respondents felt more knowledgeable and more able to apply their knowledge after viewing each lecture (p < 0.001), and found the webinars to be well-organized, well-paced, enthusiastically taught, and level-appropriate. 122/976 (13%) students and 45/291 (15%) faculty completed the postcurriculum survey. Faculty reported that OrthoACCESS was "quite useful" (4 [3-5]) for providing knowledge for an incoming orthopaedic intern. Faculty and students would recommend OrthoACCESS to future learners (5 [4-5]). CONCLUSIONS: OrthoACCESS delivered foundational musculoskeletal instruction during a period of increased need. In its initial iteration, this virtual curriculum demonstrated high utilization in the United States and internationally and improved participants' self-reported topical knowledge and ability to apply it clinically.

Milestones for neurosurgery sub-interns: a novel evaluation tool to quantitatively differentiate residency applicants.

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to create a novel milestones evaluation form for neurosurgery sub-interns and assess its potential as a quantitative and standardized performance assessment to compare potential residency applicants. In this pilot study, the authors aimed to determine the form's interrater reliability, relationship to percentile assignments in the neurosurgery standardized letter of recommendation (SLOR), ability to quantitatively differentiate tiers of students, and ease of use. METHODS: Medical student milestones were either adapted from the resident Neurological Surgery Milestones or created de novo to evaluate a student's medical knowledge, procedural aptitude, professionalism, interpersonal and communication skills, and evidence-based practice and improvement. Four milestone levels were defined, corresponding to estimated 3rd-year medical student through 2nd-year resident levels. Faculty and resident evaluations as well as student self-evaluations were completed for 35 sub-interns across 8 programs. A cumulative milestone score (CMS) was computed for each student. Student CMSs were compared both within and between programs. Interrater reliability was determined with Kendall's coefficient of concordance (Kendall's W). Student CMSs were compared against their percentile assignments in the SLOR using analysis of variance with post hoc testing. CMS-derived percentile rankings were assigned to quantitatively distinguish tiers of students. Students and faculty were surveyed on the form's usefulness. RESULTS: The average faculty rating overall was 3.20, similar to the estimated competency level of an intern. Student and faculty ratings were similar, whereas resident ratings were lower (p < 0.001). Students were rated most highly in coachability and feedback (3.49 and 3.67, respectively) and lowest in bedside procedural aptitude (2.90 and 2.85, respectively) in both faculty and self-evaluations. The median CMS was 26.5 (IQR 21.75-29.75, range 14-32) with only 2 students (5.7%) achieving the highest rating of 32. Programs that evaluated the most students differentiated the highest-performing students from the lowest by at least 13 points. A program with 3 faculty raters demonstrated scoring agreement across 5 students (p = 0.024). The CMS differed significantly between SLOR percentile assignments, despite 25% of students being assigned to the top fifth percentile. CMS-driven percentile assignment significantly differentiated the bottom, middle, and top third of students (p < 0.001). Faculty and students strongly endorsed the milestones form. CONCLUSIONS: The medical student milestones form was well received and differentiated neurosurgery sub-interns both within and across programs. This form has potential as a replacement for numerical Step 1 scoring as a standardized, quantitative performance assessment for neurosurgery residency applicants.

The Surgical Subinternship: A Unique Opportunity for Early Leadership Development.

Subinternships are formative rotations in the surgery-bound medical student's journey to surgical training. This experience allows for further exploration of career goals, plays an important evaluative role in the residency selection process, and offers ongoing opportunities for technical and non-technical development. The graduated responsibility experienced in this setting extends beyond what was experienced during the core surgical clerkship where students are first interfacing with the clinical environment. We review and reflect on the role of subinternships in developing the leadership skills that surgery-bound medical students will need to effectively lead interprofessional healthcare teams in the future.

Radiology program director's perspective on a novel hands-on advanced elective.

With the advent of the USMLE Step 1 exam moving to a pass/fail status, Radiology Program Directors (PDs) and Associate Program Directors (APDs) need alternative methods of identifying interested and engaged medical students who are applying to their program. Additionally, undergraduate radiology medical education in the United States varies widely from institution to institution with no universal mandatory radiology component. To address these problems, we implemented an advanced fourth year hands-on radiology elective where the students were treated as first year radiology residents (R1s), giving them resident-level access to the Picture Archive and Communication System (PACS) and dictation software, and allowing them to perform entry-level procedures with appropriate supervision. After implementation of the elective, a 5-question online survey was sent to two hundred and ninety-eight PDs and APDs via the Association of Program Directors in Radiology (APDR) listserv, of which seventy-two responses were compiled, yielding a response rate of 24%. The survey focused on how a hands-on medical student elective would help in assessing prospective candidates and predicting R1 performance. Most respondents felt interest in radiology, motivation, and interpersonal skills would be better assessed after such an elective and the vast majority felt hands-on Advanced Elective would be at least slightly predictive of first year resident performance. Based on this information, we believe implementing a hands-on advanced radiology elective would significantly help address the passive nature of traditional radiology electives, providing valuable information to PDs and APDs and giving the best possible radiology experience to our medical students.

Medical student advising during virtual residency recruitment: results of a national survey of internal medicine clerkship and sub-internship directors.

INTRODUCTION: The residency application process is a critical time for medical students. The COVID-19 pandemic prompted changes to the residency recruitment procedures with the conversion of interviews to a virtual format. For medical school advisors guiding students on an all-virtual residency application process brought uncertainty to their advising practices. Thus, this study aimed to identify advising practices during the 2021 virtual application cycle. METHODS: We administered an IRB-exempt national survey through the Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine to 186 internal medicine core/co-/associate/assistant clerkship directors and sub-internship directors representing 140 Liaison Committee on Medical Education-accredited U.S./U.S.-territory-based medical schools in spring 2021. The 23-question survey was designed and pilot-tested by faculty-educators and leaders with expertise in undergraduate medical education. Data analysis included paired t- and z-tests and thematic analysis of open-ended questions. RESULTS: The institutional response rate was 67% (93/140) and individual rate 55% (103/186). Half of the respondents felt prepared/very prepared (40% and 13% respectively) for their advising roles. Compared to pre-pandemic cycles, respondents advised a typical student in the middle-third of their class at their institution to apply to more residency programs (mean 24 programs vs 20, p < 0.001) and accept more interviews (mean 14 interviews vs 12, p < 0.001). Sixty-three percent (64/101) of respondents spent more time on student advising; 51% (51/101) reported more students asked them for informal advice. Fifty-nine percent (60/101) of respondents reported their advisees were able to assess a residency program 'somewhat well;' 31% (31/101) expressed that residency recruitment should remain entirely virtual in the future. CONCLUSION: The transition to virtual residency recruitment due to COVID-19 prompted advising practices that may have contributed to application inflation and increased advising workload. Future studies should explore longitudinal outcomes of virtual interviews on student success to guide best practices in how to advise students during residency recruitment.

Utility of a Pilot Neurosurgical Operative Skills Boot Camp in Medical Student Training.

OBJECTIVE: The neurosurgical sub-internship is a crucial step for prospective neurosurgeons. However, the expectations for sub-interns, particularly the technical skills required by residents and attendings, often are unclear. We present survey data on what medical students, residents, and attendings believe are important procedural proficiencies for neurosurgical sub-internships. We incorporated these tasks into a pilot skills-based craniotomy workshop, and here we report on the impact of the session on the neurosurgical training of medical students. METHODS: A 1-day craniotomy lab using cadaveric cranial specimens was conducted for medical students. Surveys querying important competencies for sub-internships were answered by residents and attendings at affiliated hospitals. Pre- and postlab surveys querying interest in and perceptions of neurosurgery, self-assessment of skills, and important competencies for sub-internship preparation were answered by attendees. RESULTS: Medical students, residents, and attendings agreed that burr-hole placement, bone replating, and galea and skin closure were of high importance for sub-interns. There was significant disagreement on the importance of dural opening and closure, establishing a craniotomy, and neuronavigation. The workshop altered perceptions of neurosurgery, with significant changes in recognizing the value of peer mentorship. Students also expressed increased confidence in technical skills, with significant improvements shown in understanding of neurosurgical high-speed drill use (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the expectations for sub-interns may be heterogeneous, there is general agreement that proficiency in the initial and final steps of craniotomies, as well as minor procedures, is recommended. Cadaveric labs can improve student engagement in neurosurgery, facilitate interactions with neurosurgical departments, and enhance technical skills.

Orthopaedic surgery residency match trends during COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.

Orthopaedic surgery is one of the more competitive specialties for medical students to pursue. Students often complete subinternship rotations to demonstrate skill, work ethic, and fit within a program. Away rotations were suspended during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This investigation compared home and regional match rates before the pandemic to the match cycle of 2020-2021. Results: There was a statistically significant increase in students matching to their home program, and insignificant increase in regional matches. Conclusions: This increase is likely due in part to the familiarity of students to programs where they could still rotate during the pandemic. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Implementation of a Standardized Sub-Intern Curriculum Improves Confidence for those Entering a Surgical Residency.

OBJECTIVE: Medical students often feel underprepared entering surgical residency. We have previously reported the results of a sub-intern needs assessment (SINA) which informed the creation of a standardized sub-internship curriculum. We aimed to determine if implementation of this curriculum into students' scheduled rotations would improve student confidence in their abilities related to the AAMC Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency (CEPAERs). DESIGN: We surveyed 4th year medical students during their surgery sub-internship. Sub-interns participated in a weekly series of 2-hour didactic sessions. We utilized interactive lectures and case scenarios addressing the pertinent topics identified in our previous needs assessment. The surveys were administered before and after the rotation and linked using unique identifiers. The surveys assessed confidence in each of the CEPAERs as well as the top 25 topics prioritized by our needs assessment. Self-reported confidence in each of the topics was measured using Likert scales (CEPAER scale 1-5, SINA scale 1-6). Pre- and post-curriculum confidence on a variety of topics were compared using paired t-tests. SETTING: Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth/Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, a tertiary-care academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Fourth year medical students participating in their general surgery sub-internship. RESULTS: Twelve medical students participated in general and thoracic surgery sub-internships over the course of the study period. Ten (83%) participated in the didactic curriculum and they all completed both the pre- and postsurvey. 100% of the respondents agreed that the curriculum provided a useful supplement to their clinical experience. With respect to the CEPAERs, students reported improved confidence in 77% of the areas, with statistically significant increases occurring in the following areas: ability to prioritize a differential diagnosis (average Likert rating improved from 3.7 to 4.1, p = 0.04), comfort entering and discussing orders (2.9-3.8, p = 0.007), and overall preparedness to be a surgical intern (3.2-3.8, p = 0.02). Students also reported improvement in confidence in 92% of the basic intern responsibility topics, with statistically significant increases in maintenance fluid calculations (Likert rating 3.5-4.5, p = 0.001), repleting electrolytes (3.8-4.6, p = 0.01), interpretation of chest and abdominal x-rays (4-5, p = 0.02; 3.6-4.5, p=0.004, respectively), management of oliguria (3.2-3.8, p = 0.02), and time management/organization skills (4.5-5.4, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a standardized sub-intern curriculum improved student confidence in 33 of the 38 basic intern responsibilities, core Entrustable Professional Activities, and overall preparedness to be a surgical intern. While limited by a single institution design, we believe these results offer a new avenue for educating and preparing medical students for residency within their existing sub-internships.