Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
1.
Arq. ciências saúde UNIPAR ; 27(1): 511-530, Jan-Abr. 2023.
Artigo em Português | LILACS | ID: biblio-1417859

RESUMO

No fim de 2019 iniciou-se uma das maiores crises da saúde pública global em Wuhan, China. Essa emergência foi o aparecimento do SARS-CoV-2 e da doença COVID-19, uma síndrome respiratória aguda de alta transmissibilidade. A declaração da pandemia pela OMS em março de 2020 fez com que o mundo tomasse diversas medidas para o combate e contenção da doença. Inicialmente o isolamento social e lockdown foram as principais iniciativas, já que não havia formas de tratamento ou prevenção da doença. Essas medidas restritivas geraram uma mudança de hábito da população que deflagrou sérios comprometimentos físicos e psicológicos. Uma das consequências foi o aumento do uso de substâncias de abuso e, consequentemente, do transtornos por uso de substâncias, dentre elas o tabaco. Durante a pandemia o consumo de cigarro aumentou de 10 a 30% no mundo, o tabagismo é a principal causa de morte evitável e fator de risco para diversas doenças. Conjuntamente ao álcool, a nicotina têm um poder aditivo superior a muitas drogas ilícitas. A combinação dos transtornos por uso de substâncias e a COVID-19 acabam por ter um efeito sinérgico, dessa forma, buscamos integrar aspectos neuroquímicos, cognitivos e comportamentais que levaram ao aumento do consumo e/ou recaída nicotina e a terapêutica utilizada.


One of the biggest global public health crisis began in Wuhan, China at the end of 2019. That emergency was the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 and the disease COVID-19, a highly transmissible acute respiratory syndrome. The pandemic declaration by the WHO in March 2020 caused the world to take on several measures to combat and contain the virus. Initially, social isolation and lockdown were the main initiatives, as there were no forms of treatment or prevention of the disease. These restrictive measures generate a change in the habit of the population that triggered serious physical and psychological impairments. One of the consequences was the increase in the use of substances of abuse and, consequently, substance use disorder, including tobacco. During the pandemic, cigarette consumption increased from 10 to 30% worldwide, whereas smoking is the main cause of preventable death and a risk factor for several diseases. Along with alcohol, nicotine has a greater addictive power than illicit drugs. Substance use disorders and COVID-19 have a synergistic effect, in this way, we seek to integrate neurochemical, cognitive and behavioral aspects that led to increased consumption and/or relapse in nicotine consumption and the used therapy.


Una de las mayores crisis mundiales de salud pública comenzó en Wuhan (China) a finales de 2019. Esa emergencia fue la aparición del SARS-CoV-2 y la enfermedad COVID-19, un síndrome respiratorio agudo altamente transmisible. La declaración de pandemia por parte de la OMS en marzo de 2020 hizo que el mundo adoptara varias medidas para combatir y contener el virus. Inicialmente, el aislamiento social y el encierro fueron las principales iniciativas, ya que no existían formas de tratamiento o prevención de la enfermedad. Estas medidas restrictivas generaron un cambio en los hábitos de la población que desencadenó graves alteraciones físicas y psicológicas. Una de las consecuencias fue el aumento del consumo de sustancias de abuso y, en consecuencia, el trastorno por consumo de sustancias, incluido el tabaco. Durante la pandemia, el consumo de cigarrillos aumentó del 10 al 30% en todo el mundo, mientras que el tabaquismo es la principal causa de muerte evitable y un factor de riesgo de varias enfermedades. Junto con el alcohol, la nicotina tiene un mayor poder adictivo que las drogas ilícitas. Los trastornos por uso de sustancias y la COVID-19 tienen un efecto sinérgico, de esta manera, buscamos integrar los aspectos neuroquímicos, cognitivos y conductuales que llevaron al aumento del consumo y/o recaída en el consumo de nicotina y la terapia utilizada.


Assuntos
Humanos , Tabagismo/epidemiologia , Pandemias/história , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Ansiedade , Recidiva , Epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Vareniclina/uso terapêutico , Angústia Psicológica
2.
Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. (Online) ; 59: e20883, 2023. graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1429966

RESUMO

Abstract Nicotine addiction leads to in a huge burden on public health and the economy worldwide. Resveratrol (3,5,4'-tetrahydroxystilbene) is the most well-known polyphenolic stilbenoid. Resveratrol was shown to exhibit positive effects on numerous mechanisms that are important for drug and substance addiction. Thus, this study aimed to examine the effect of resveratrol on nicotine addiction. Intraperitoneal (i.p.) treatment with nicotine (0.5 mg/kg) significantly enhanced time spent in the nicotine-paired compartment. Resveratrol (50 and 75 mg/kg, i.p.) and varenicline (2 mg/kg, i.p.) co-administered with nicotine during the 3-day conditioning period effectively diminished the acquisition of nicotine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP). On the other hand, the administration of resveratrol (50 and 75 mg/kg, i.p.) and varenicline (2 mg/kg, i.p.) decreased the low dose (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.) nicotine-induced reinstatement. The results suggest that resveratrol and varenicline inhibit the acquisition and reinstatement of nicotine's reward properties. Resveratrol displayed similar results in the CPP phases as obtained with the reference drug varenicline. In conclusion, resveratrol could be beneficial as an adjuvant pharmacotherapy for nicotine addiction; however, more investigation is needed to completely explain this property.


Assuntos
Animais , Masculino , Camundongos , Tabagismo/diagnóstico , Resveratrol/efeitos adversos , Vareniclina/efeitos adversos
3.
Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. (1992) ; 66(2): 146-152, Feb. 2020. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | Sec. Est. Saúde SP, LILACS | ID: biblio-1136177

RESUMO

SUMMARY Varenicline is a useful pharmacological option for smoking cessation. Unfortunately, there is a lack of studies on its effectiveness, retention, and side effects in low- and middle-income countries. The present study aimed to investigate gender differences regarding these outcomes in a Brazilian clinical sample (n = 124). The 12-week treatment protocol included six consultations with a psychiatrist and six sessions of cognitive-behavioral therapy. All subjects received varenicline on the first evaluation, following the standard posology for 12 weeks and instructions to stop smoking after the second week of treatment. Both Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) Plus and Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence were applied at baseline. The UKU-Side Effects Rating Scale was administered at weeks 3, 7, and 11, and the Questionnaire of Smoking Urges-Brief at weeks 1, 5, and 9 to ascertain the side effects of the medication and craving, respectively. At the end of the 12-week treatment, abstinence was biochemically assessed. At months 6 and 12 after the treatment, follow-up telephone interviews were conducted to access nicotine abstinence. Short- and long-term abstinence and retention rates did not differ between genders. However, women presented more side effects than men, especially in the second half of the treatment. Increased dream activity, reduced duration of sleep, constipation, and weight loss were the most notable side effects. Despite women reporting more side effects than men, this difference did not influence the treatment success rates.


RESUMO A vareniclina é uma opção farmacológica útil para a cessação do tabagismo. Infelizmente, há uma ausência de estudos sobre a eficácia, retenção e efeitos colaterais para este medicamento em países de baixa e média renda. O presente estudo teve como objetivo investigar diferenças entre gênero em relação a esses desfechos em uma amostra clínica brasileira (n = 124). O protocolo de tratamento de 12 semanas incluiu seis consultas com um psiquiatra e seis sessões de psicoterapia cognitivo-comportamental. Todos os indivíduos receberam vareniclina na primeira avaliação, seguindo a posologia padrão por 12 semanas e instrução para parar de fumar a partir da segunda semana de tratamento. Tanto o Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) Plus quanto o Teste de Fagerstrom para Dependência de Nicotina foram aplicados no início do estudo. A escala de efeitos colaterais (UKU-Side Effects Rating Scale) foi aplicada nas semanas 3, 7 e 11, e o Questionário Breve de Fissura (Questionnaire of Smoking Urges-Brief) nas semanas 1, 5 e 9 para investigar os efeitos colaterais da medicação e fissura, respectivamente. No final do tratamento de 12 semanas, a abstinência foi avaliada bioquimicamente. Aos 6 e 12 meses após o tratamento, foram realizadas entrevistas telefônicas de acompanhamento para acessar a abstinência de nicotina. As taxas de abstinência e retenção de curto e longo prazo não diferiram entre gêneros. No entanto, as mulheres apresentaram mais efeitos colaterais do que os homens, principalmente na segunda metade do tratamento. Aumento da atividade dos sonhos, redução da duração do sono, constipação e perda de peso foram os efeitos colaterais mais notáveis. Apesar de as mulheres relatarem mais efeitos colaterais que os homens, essa diferença não influenciou as taxas de sucesso do tratamento.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Vareniclina/efeitos adversos , Agentes de Cessação do Hábito de Fumar/efeitos adversos , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Fatores de Tempo , Brasil , Fatores Sexuais , Inquéritos e Questionários , Seguimentos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estatísticas não Paramétricas
4.
J. bras. pneumol ; 46(2): e20180406, 2020. tab, graf
Artigo em Português | LILACS | ID: biblio-1090800

RESUMO

RESUMO Objetivo O objetivo deste estudo foi investigar os efeitos agudos e crônicos da vareniclina no tecido pulmonar em um estudo experimental. Métodos Um total de 34 ratos foi alocado aleatoriamente em grupos de estudo (vareniclina) e controle. Assim, os ratos foram divididos em dois grupos: (i) grupo controle e (ii) grupo vareniclina. A seguir, os ratos de cada grupo foram, por sua vez, subdivididos igualmente em agudos (C1; V1) e crônicos (C2; V2), e todos os ratos dos grupos agudos e crônicos foram sacrificados sob anestesia: no 45.º dia, para o grupo agudo [C1 (n=5) e V1 (n=12)], e no 90.º dia, para o grupo crônico [C2 (n=5) e V2 (n=12)], respectivamente. Em seguida, foram realizadas análises bioquímicas e histopatológicas. Resultados Trinta e quatro ratos completaram o estudo. Destes ratos, 24 estavam no grupo vareniclina e 10 no grupo controle. Na exposição crônica à vareniclina, os níveis de oxidante composto por malondialdeído (MDA) e mieloperoxidase (MPO) aumentaram, e os níveis de superóxido dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutationa (GSH) e glutationa peroxidase (GPx), nomeados como antioxidantes, diminuiram significativamente quando comparados com o grupo controle. Os níveis de MDA e MPO também foram significativamente mais elevados e os níveis de SOD, CAT, GPx e GSH foram significativamente mais baixos no grupo vareniclina crônico, quando comparado ao grupo vareniclina agudo. Estes achados também foram confirmados por observações histopatológicas. Conclusões Este é o primeiro estudo que avaliou os efeitos pulmonares da vareniclina experimentalmente em um modelo animal. Observamos que o tratamento crônico da vareniclina causa inflamação e lesão pulmonar.


ABSTRACT Objective This study aimed to investigate acute and chronic effects of varenicline on lung tissue in an experimental study. Methods A total of 34 rats were randomly allocated into study (varenicline) and control groups. The rats were divided into two groups (i) control group, (ii) varenicline group. Then, the rats in the each group were sub-divided equally in turn as acute (C1; V1) and chronic (C2; V2) ; all rats of acute and chronic groups were sacrificed under the anesthesia on the 45th day for acute group [C1 (n=5) and V1 (n=12)] and the 90th day for chronic group [C2 (n=5) and V2 (n=12)], respectively. Thus, biochemical and histopathological analysis were carried out. Results Thirty four rats completed the study, 24 were in varenicline group and 10 were in control group. In chronic exposure to varenicline, oxidant levels comprising of malondialdehyde (MDA), and myeloperoxidase (MPO) increased and superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione (GSH) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) levels, named as antioxidants, decreased significantly when compared to the control group. MDA and MPO levels were also significantly higher and SOD, CAT, GPx, GSH levels were also significantly lower in chronic varenicline group when compared to acute varenicline group. These findings were also supported by histopathological observations. Conclusion This is the first study, which evaluated pulmonary effects of varenicline experimentally on an animal model. It was observed that chronic varenicline treatments cause inflammation and lung cell injury.


Assuntos
Animais , Ratos , Superóxido Dismutase/sangue , Vareniclina/farmacologia , Pulmão/efeitos dos fármacos , Catalase/sangue , Estresse Oxidativo , Glutationa , Glutationa Peroxidase , Malondialdeído/sangue
6.
Rev. invest. clín ; 71(1): 7-16, Jan.-Feb. 2019. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1289665

RESUMO

Abstract Background Smoking is considered an epidemic, indeed, one of the most important public health problems worldwide. It is also the most significant preventable cause of death, of a high number of premature deaths, and avoidable chronic diseases. It is considered an enormous economic burden for the world. Objective To provide an overview of smoking-cessation treatments, including pharmacological and psychological options, and to gather current scientific evidence available on them. Methods Research included reviewing publications from 2007-2018 in four databases using algorithms related to bupropion, varenicline, nicotine replacement therapy, smoking cessation, psychological treatment, motivational interview, cognitive-behavioral therapy and clinical guidelines for smoking treatment. Meta-analyses or systematic reviews and randomized or quasi-randomized trials were selected. We also included clinical guidelines for smoking treatment from Mexico and other countries. Results After refining the search, 37 articles met the criteria and were included in the review. The results were grouped by type of intervention. Conclusions It is necessary to conduct research on combinations of both kinds of treatment with an integral, multidisciplinary vision. Current standard for smoking cessation is a combined psychological and pharmacological treatment.


Assuntos
Humanos , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Dispositivos para o Abandono do Uso de Tabaco , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Fumar/epidemiologia , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/psicologia , Bupropiona/administração & dosagem , Entrevista Motivacional/métodos , Vareniclina/administração & dosagem , Agentes de Cessação do Hábito de Fumar/administração & dosagem , México
7.
Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. (Online) ; 55: e18186, 2019. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1011646

RESUMO

Despite so many global efforts, smoking still remains to be one of the most common addictions worldwide. Even though most smokers wish to quit smoking, many of them fail. In this respect, genetic variants are thought to be remarkable factors in nicotine dependence and in treatment of smoking cessation. This is a paper investigating a single variant p-glycoprotein (P-gp) polymorphisms and its effect on Varenicline efficacy in the smoking cessation. 158 smokers and 52 non-smoker healthy volunteers were included. We determined the P-gp C3435T gene polymorphisms in all subjects. Face to face interviews with smokers were performed for smoking cessation and Varenicline was given for smoking cessation. Cessation success was evaluated in the 6th month and success rates were compared according to the P-gp genotype distributions. In our study, smoking cessation rate by Varenicline was 57.0%. This rate was 55.0% in females, and 57.2% in males (p=0.85). The P-gp C3435T gene distribution was similar in control, quitters and not-quitter groups. Cessation rate was at highest point in genotype CT (62.2%) and at the lowest in TT (47.6%). It was 53.8% in genotype CC and there was no statistically significant difference (p=0.27). Our results suggest that genetic variants of P-gp C3435T did not significantly affect Varenicline treatment for smoking cessation.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Tabagismo/genética , Vareniclina/análise , Vareniclina/efeitos adversos , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Abandono do Uso de Tabaco/métodos
8.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 145(11): 1471-1479, nov. 2017. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS, BIGG - guias GRADE | ID: biblio-902468

RESUMO

Considering that a high proportion of the Chilean general population smokes, the Chilean Society of Respiratory Diseases in collaboration with the Chilean Societies of Cardiology and, Endocrinology and Diabetes, formed an interdisciplinary group, who issued a set of recommendations for the treatment of the smoker, methodologically advised by experts. These interventions should be prioritized in high-risk groups. Methods The panel elaborated and graded the recommendations following the GRADE methodology. To assess the effect of each intervention, systematic reviews and randomized clinical trials were identified. In addition, a search of studies done with the Chilean population was carried out. For each of the questions, the panel determined the direction and strength of the recommendation through a decision evidence table. Recommendations For all smokers, the panel recommends using brief counseling ABC on non-intervention, using mobile telephone interventions on non-intervention, using text message on non-intervention, (strong recommendation; moderate certainty in the evidence of the effects). For motivated individuals, with indication for quitting drugs the panel recommends using nicotine replacement therapy on non-intervention, using bupropion on non-intervention, using varenicline on non-intervention. (strong recommendation; moderate certainty in the evidence of the effects). Discussion This clinical practice guide provides recommendations based on the evidence for smoking cessation.


El propósito de esta guía es presentar recomendaciones basadas en evidencia sobre las intervenciones disponibles para dejar de fumar. Su audiencia objetivo corresponde a todos los profesionales de la salud y su población objetivo corresponde a personas fumadoras atendidas en ambientes ambulatorios u hospitalarios, además de poblaciones especiales como embarazadas, adolescentes y pacientes con enfermedad psiquiátrica (compensada por al menos tres meses).


Assuntos
Humanos , Tabagismo/tratamento farmacológico , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Tabagismo/psicologia , Chile , Bupropiona/uso terapêutico , Vareniclina/uso terapêutico , Abordagem GRADE
9.
Rev. chil. enferm. respir ; 33(3): 167-175, set. 2017. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: biblio-899671

RESUMO

RESUMEN Considerando que la población chilena tiene una historia de alto consumo de tabaco la Sociedad Chilena de Enfermedades Respiratorias en colaboración con las Sociedades Chilenas de Cardiología; Endocrinología y Diabetes formó un grupo interdisciplinario que emitió un conjunto de recomendaciones para el enfrentamiento del paciente fumador, asesorado metodológicamente por expertos. Estas intervenciones deben priorizarse en grupos de alto riesgo. Métodos: El panel elaboró y graduó las recomendaciones siguiendo la metodología GRADE. Para estimar el efecto de cada intervención, se identificó revisiones sistemáticas y estudios clínicos aleatorizados. Además, se realizó una búsqueda de estudios realizados con población chilena. Para cada una de las preguntas, el panel determinó la dirección y fuerza de la recomendación mediante una tabla de la Evidencia a la Decisión. Recomendaciones: Para todos los fumadores, el panel recomienda usar consejería breve sobre no intervención, consejería vía telefonía móvil sobre no intervención, y mensajes de texto sobre no intervención (recomendación fuerte; certeza moderada en la evidencia de los efectos). Para los individuos motivados, con indicación de fármacos para dejar de fumar el panel recomienda terapia de reemplazo de nicotina sobre no intervención, bupropión sobre no intervención, vareniclina sobre no intervención (recomendación fuerte; certeza moderada en la evidencia de los efectos). Discusión: Se emiten recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia para el tratamiento del tabaquismo.


Considering that Chilean population has a high tobacco consumption history, the Chilean Society of Respiratory Diseases in collaboration with the Chilean Societies of Cardiology and, Endocrinology and Diabetes, formed an interdisciplinary group, who issued a set of recommendations for the treatment of the smoker, methodologically advised by experts. These interventions should be prioritized in high-risk groups. Methods: The panel elaborated and graded the recommendations following the GRADE methodology. To assess the effect of each intervention, systematic reviews and randomized clinical trials were identified. In addition, a search of studies done with the Chilean population was carried out. For each of the questions, the panel determined the direction and strength of the recommendation through a decision evidence table. Recommendations: For all smokers, the panel recommends using brief counseling ABC on non-intervention, using mobile telephone interventions on non-intervention, using text message on non-intervention, (strong recommendation; moderate certainty in the evidence of the effects). For motivated individuals, with indication for quitting drugs the panel recommends using nicotine replacement therapy on non-intervention, using bupropion on non-intervention, using varenicline on non-intervention. (strong recommendation; moderate certainty in the evidence of the effects). Discussion: This clinical practice guide provides recommendations based on the evidence for smoking cessation.


Assuntos
Humanos , Adulto , Tabagismo/tratamento farmacológico , Tabagismo/epidemiologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Tabagismo/terapia , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Bupropiona/uso terapêutico , Vareniclina/uso terapêutico , Nicotina/uso terapêutico
10.
Rev. chil. enferm. respir ; 33(3): 212-215, set. 2017.
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: biblio-899682

RESUMO

Resumen Vareniclina es terapia de primera línea para la cesación del tabaquismo, y presenta la mayor efectividad demostrada ampliamente en ensayos clínicos logrando cifras de abandono al año del orden de 25-35%. En la más reciente revisión de efectividad realizada por la Cochrane se evaluaron 39 ensayos que randomizaban vareniclina contra placebo y en comparación con sustitutos de nicotina (TRN) y bupropión. Con vareniclina se objetivó un RR de 2,24 para abstinencia a 6 meses o más prolongado a dosis standard (2 mg al día) contra placebo. El RR de vareniclina versus placebo comparando con bupropión o TRN fue de 1,3 y 1,25 respectivamente mostrando su superioridad una vez más. Cuando se evaluó el uso de vareniclina por un periodo más prolongado que 12 semanas, se observó que la droga fue bien tolerada sugiriendo que es factible su uso sin intensificar los efectos adversos.


Varenicline is a first-line therapy cessation of smoking, and has the highest effectiveness widely demonstrated in clinical trials with drop-out figures per year of the order of 25-35%. In the most recent effectiveness review conducted by the Cochrane, 39 trials were evaluated that randomized varenicline versus placebo and compared with nicotine substitutes (NRT) and bupropion. With varenicline, a RR of 2.24 was observed for abstinence at 6 months or longer at standard doses (2 mg daily) versus placebo. The RR of varenicline versus placebo compared with bupropion or NRT was 1.3 and 1.25 respectively showing its superiority once again. When the use of varenicline was evaluated for a period longer than 12 weeks, it was observed that the drug was well tolerated suggesting that its use is feasible without intensifying the adverse effects.


Assuntos
Humanos , Tabagismo/tratamento farmacológico , Tabagismo/epidemiologia , Vareniclina/uso terapêutico , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Bupropiona/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas Nicotínicos , Nicotina
11.
Rev. chil. enferm. respir ; 33(3): 216-218, set. 2017.
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: biblio-899683

RESUMO

Resumen La terapia combinada es la de mezcla de farmacos para al cesación del tabaquismo, tal como terapias de reemplazo nicotínico (TRN) en modalidad prolongada como es el parche junto a una modalidad de acción corta como puede ser chicle, goma, lozenge, pastillas o inhalador nasal), es decir dos o más fármacos aprobados y demostrados útlies para el cese del tabaco con o sin el apoyo de TRN. Es muy importante considerar la comorbilidad médica y psiquiatrica porque la población que persiste adicta es cada vez más compleja en términos de comorbilidades y elevado nivel adictivo. La mayor parte de las terapias combinadas usan TRN asociadas a bupropión o vareniclina. Existe evidencia sobre efectividad y seguridad de las TRN utilizadas entre ellas o en asociación a vareniclina o bupropión, sin embargo, la evidencia sobre seguridad en la modalidad combinada no es tan robusta como la que existe para cada fármaco en monoterapia, ya que los efectos adversos se suman de manera que se sugiere reservar las combinaciones para personas con alto nivel de adicción y/o con historia de fracaso en intentos previos con monoterapia. En suma, los fármacos de demostrada efectividad y seguridad como TRN, bupropión y vareniclina pueden usarse en combinación doble o triple, preferenciando el uso de TRN de corta acción cuando se adiciona a alguno de los fármacos orales para aliviar la ansiedad por fumar.


This therapy is a combination of medicines consisting of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) using a prolonged modality such as the patch, along with a short-acting medicine such as chewing gum, lozenge, gum, or nasal inhaler). This means two or more drugs approved and demonstrated useful for cessation of smoking with or without the support of NRT. It is very important to consider medical and psychiatric comorbidity because the population that persists addicted is increasingly complex in terms of comorbidities and high addictive level. Most of the combination therapies use NRT associated with bupropion or varenicline. There is evidence on the effectiveness and safety of TRN used in both modalitres (long and short acting) in combination with varenicline or bupropion. However, safety evidence is not robust for the combination modality as it is for, each drug as monotherapy, since adverse effects are added so it is suggested to reserve the combinations for people with high level of addiction and / or history of failure in previous attempts with monotherapy. In summary, therapy with demonstrated effectiveness as NRT, bupropion and varenicline can be used in double or triple combination, prefering the use of short acting NRT added to one of the oral drugs to alleviate smoking anxiety.


Assuntos
Humanos , Adulto , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/psicologia , Bupropiona , Terapia Combinada , Dispositivos para o Abandono do Uso de Tabaco , Vareniclina , Nicotina
12.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 144(8): 965-971, ago. 2016. ilus, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: biblio-830600

RESUMO

Background: Smoking cessation therapies include counseling, psychological management and pharmacological therapy. Varenicline is the most effective and safe medication available. Aim: To study risk factors for the failure of pharmacological smoking cessation therapy with varenicline. Patients and Methods: Retrospective analysis of 281 patients aged 45 ± 11 years (65% males) with a mean consumption of 31 ± 22 packs/year. They completed a smoking cessation program comprising psychological support and use of varenicline in a private clinic. Patients were followed with telephonic interviews during one year. A complete abstinence during one year was considered as a success of the program. Results: The success rate of the program was 53.4%. The factors associated with failure were a high tobacco dependence rate determined with the Fageström test (Odds ratio (OR) 2.47, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.16-5.26, p = 0.02). An instruction level of more than 12 years was associated with a lower failure rate (OR 0.38 95% CI 0.18-0.82). Conclusions: A high tobacco dependence rate and a lower education were associated with a higher failure rate of this smoking cessation program.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Fumar/tratamento farmacológico , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Agonistas Nicotínicos/uso terapêutico , Vareniclina/uso terapêutico , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Fumar/psicologia , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Resultado do Tratamento , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/psicologia , Idade de Início , Escolaridade , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/normas
13.
Rev. chil. enferm. respir ; 31(2): 94-100, jun. 2015. graf, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: lil-757183

RESUMO

Background: Tobacco use is one of the main preventable causes of morbidity and mortality in the world. This report presents the experience of the smoking cessation team from the National Thorax Institute (Instituto Nacional del Tórax-Chile). Patients and Method: A clinical series of patients treated between April 2013 and March 2014, with one-year follow-up was studied. Intervention was based on seven group sessions, with a cognitive behavioral viewpoint and pharmacological treatment (mainly varenicline). Follow-up was done through telephone calls at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. Descriptive statistics and X² test were used. Results: Eighty-seven patients were treated, mean age 54 years, 63% women; 79% had a pack year index over 20; 28% had depression and 16% had COPD. 59% received varenicline. Self-reported abstinence for 12 months was 37%. No significant differences between high risk groups were found. Conclusion: The smoking cessation program done at the National Thorax Institute shows that it is feasible to implement this type of programs in the public health system of Chile with results comparable to those internationally published.


Introducción: El tabaco es uno de los principales factores de morbimortalidad prevenible en el mundo. En este artículo se presenta la experiencia del equipo de tratamiento del tabaquismo en el Instituto Nacional del Tórax (INT). Método: Se analizaron los pacientes tratados entre abril de 2013 y marzo de 2014, con seguimiento a un año. La intervención consistió en 7 sesiones grupales con enfoque cognitivo conductual y terapia farmacológica (principalmente vareniclina). El seguimiento fue telefónico al mes 1, 3, 6 y 12. Se utilizó estadística descriptiva y test de X². Resultados: Se sometieron a tratamiento 87pacientes, edad promedio 54 años, 63% mujeres; tienen índice paquete año sobre 20 el 79%, depresión 28% y Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica 16%. El 59% recibió vareniclina. La abstinencia autoreportada a 12 meses fue de 37%. No se encontraron diferencias significativas en grupos de riesgo. Conclusión: La experiencia de tratamiento anti-tabaco realizada en el INT muestra que es factible implementar este tipo de programas en el sistema público de salud chileno con resultados comparables a las publicaciones internacionales.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/estatística & dados numéricos , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental , Chile , Epidemiologia Descritiva , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Vareniclina/uso terapêutico
14.
Rev. salud pública ; 16(5): 661-673, set.-oct. 2014. ilus, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: lil-743928

RESUMO

Objetivo Revisar la eficacia y seguridad de medicamentos para cesación del tabaquismo en el contexto de construcción de guías de práctica clínica (GPC). Métodos Revisión sistemática de GPC para adaptación mediante ADAPTE. Los desenlaces fueron cesación ≥6 meses y seguridad de las intervenciones. Las GPC se calificaron por pares con DELBI. Se extrajeron resultados de estudios agregativos incluidos en las guías seleccionadas. Resultados Los fármacos duplican la cesación comparados con placebo (tasas de 25,0 % hasta 27,0 % al combinarse con consejería). Los mayores incrementos en cesación se obtienen con ansiolíticos y antidepresivos (8,7% a 19,4%), y los menores con terapia de reemplazo nicotínico -TRN- (5,2% a 12,9%). La nortriptilina tiene eficacia similar al bupropion (aproximadamente 10,0 %). Con limitadas excepciones (parche e inhalador, tabletas y bupropion), las combinaciones de medicamentos no incrementan la abstinencia. Conclusiones TRN, vareniclina, bupropion y nortriptilina son eficaces para dejar de fumar. Las combinaciones de medicamentos requieren más evidencia y deberían restringirse a personas con alta dependencia o con falla terapéutica inicial. Serían deseables análisis de costo-efectividad para valorar implementación de programas en países en desarrollo.


Objective To review the efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation in the context of clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Methods A systematic review of CPGs was conducted, aimed at adapting recommendations for Colombia following the ADAPTE methodology. Outcomes comprised 6-months or higher smoking cessation rates and intervention safety. CPGs were peer-assessed based on DELBI. Results from aggregative studies included in selected CPGs were obtained. Results Pharmacotherapy doubles smoking cessation rates as compared with placebos (rates @25% and up to 27 % when combined with counseling). The highest efficacy was observed for ansyolitic and antidepressive drugs (8.7 % to 19.4 %), and the lowest for nicotine replacement therapy -NRT- (5.2 % to 12.9 %). Nortriptiline shows an efficacy similar to that of bupropion (@10%). With limited exceptions, combined pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation has shown no significant increase in cessation rates. Conclusions NRT, varenicline, bupropion and nortriptiline are effective treatments for smoking cessation. Combination of drugs deserves further clinical evidence and should be restricted to highly dependent smokers or initial therapeutic failure. Cost-effectiveness analyses might help to introduce smoking cessation programs in low and middle income countries.


Assuntos
Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Dispositivos para o Abandono do Uso de Tabaco , Ansiolíticos/efeitos adversos , Ansiolíticos/uso terapêutico , Antidepressivos/efeitos adversos , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Arritmias Cardíacas/induzido quimicamente , Bupropiona/efeitos adversos , Bupropiona/uso terapêutico , Dor no Peito/induzido quimicamente , Clonidina/efeitos adversos , Clonidina/uso terapêutico , Colômbia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Vias de Administração de Medicamentos , Erupção por Droga/etiologia , Quimioterapia Combinada , Gastroenteropatias/induzido quimicamente , Mucosite/induzido quimicamente , Nortriptilina/efeitos adversos , Nortriptilina/uso terapêutico , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono/induzido quimicamente , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/economia , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Dispositivos para o Abandono do Uso de Tabaco/efeitos adversos , Dispositivos para o Abandono do Uso de Tabaco/economia , Resultado do Tratamento , Vareniclina/efeitos adversos , Vareniclina/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...