Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 68
Filtrar
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(12): e2134614, 2021 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34889949

RESUMEN

Importance: The proposed MOLEM (Management of Lesion to Exclude Melanoma) schema is more clinically relevant than Melanocytic Pathology Assessment Tool and Hierarchy for Diagnosis (MATH-Dx) for the management classification of melanocytic and nonmelanocytic lesions excised to exclude melanoma. A more standardized way of establishing diagnostic criteria will be crucial in the training of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms. Objective: To examine pathologists' variability, reliability, and confidence in reporting melanocytic and nonmelanocytic lesions excised to exclude melanoma using the MOLEM schema in a population of higher-risk patients. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study enrolled higher-risk patients referred to a primary care skin clinic in New South Wales, Australia, between April 2019 and December 2019. Baseline demographic characteristics including age, sex, and related clinical details (eg, history of melanoma) were collected. Patients with lesions suspicious for melanoma assessed by a primary care physician underwent clinical evaluation, dermoscopy imaging, and subsequent excision biopsy of the suspected lesion(s). A total of 217 lesions removed and prepared by conventional histologic method and stained with hematoxylin-eosin were reviewed by up to 9 independent pathologists for diagnosis using the MOLEM reporting schema. Pathologists evaluating for MOLEM schema were masked to the original histopathologic diagnosis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Characteristics of the lesions were described and the concordance of cases per MOLEM class was assessed. Interrater agreement and the agreement between pathologists' ratings and the majority MOLEM diagnosis were calculated by Gwet AC1 with quadratic weighting applied. The diagnostic confidence of pathologists was then assessed. Results: A total of 197 patients were included in the study (102 [51.8%] male; 95 [48.2%] female); mean (SD) age was 64.2 (15.8) years (range, 24-93 years). Overall, 217 index lesions were assessed with a total of 1516 histological diagnoses. Of 1516 diagnoses, 677 (44.7%) were classified as MOLEM class I; 120 (7.9%) as MOLEM class II; 564 (37.2%) as MOLEM class III; 114 (7.5%) as MOLEM class IV; and 55 (3.6%) as MOLEM class V. Concordance rates per MOLEM class were 88.6% (class I), 50.8% (class II), 76.2% (class III), 77.2% (class IV), and 74.2% (class V). The quadratic weighted interrater agreement was 91.3%, with a Gwet AC1 coefficient of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.72-0.81). The quadratic weighted agreement between pathologists' ratings and majority MOLEM was 94.7%, with a Gwet AC1 coefficient of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.84-0.88). The confidence in diagnosis data showed a relatively high level of confidence (between 1.0 and 1.5) when diagnosing classes I (mean [SD], 1.3 [0.3]), IV (1.3 [0.3]) and V (1.1 [0.1]); while classes II (1.8 [0.2]) and III (1.5 [0.4]) were diagnosed with a lower level of pathologist confidence (≥1.5). The quadratic weighted interrater confidence rating agreement was 95.2%, with a Gwet AC1 coefficient of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.90-0.94) for the 1314 confidence ratings collected. The confidence agreement for each MOLEM class was 95.0% (class I), 93.5% (class II), 95.3% (class III), 96.5% (class IV), and 97.5% (class V). Conclusions and Relevance: The proposed MOLEM schema better reflects clinical practice than the MPATH-Dx schema in lesions excised to exclude melanoma by combining diagnoses with similar prognostic outcomes for melanocytic and nonmelanocytic lesions into standardized classification categories. Pathologists' level of confidence appeared to follow the MOLEM schema diagnostic concordance trend, ie, atypical naevi and melanoma in situ diagnoses were the least agreed upon and the most challenging for pathologists to confidently diagnose.


Asunto(s)
Melanoma/clasificación , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Patólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/clasificación , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Inteligencia Artificial , Biopsia , Estudios de Cohortes , Intervalos de Confianza , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nueva Gales del Sur , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Adulto Joven
2.
Ann Clin Lab Sci ; 51(4): 461-469, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34452884

RESUMEN

Chemotherapy originated in the early 1960s. The initial chemotherapeutic agents focused on blocking metabolic pathways and found substantial success in certain types of tumors, but they are generally considered toxic to all normal and tumor cells, and they have significant side effects. As more scientific studies began to identify many new, specific targets and mutations, along with a multitude of growth pathways in tumor cells, new agents targeting cell growth pathways began to emerge in the late 1990s and early 2000s. In 2003, a method called morphoproteomics was developed to evaluate the immunohistochemical protein expressions of target markers in tumors, and it has been considered a pioneering method for guiding targeted therapy. Subsequently, many genomic techniques have been established for identifying specific mutations and tumor markers in order to guide the targeted therapy. More recently, immuno-oncology therapy targeting specific immune markers has been rapidly developed, and the immunohistochemical evaluation of specific immune markers such as PD-L1 demonstrates further expansion of oncologic morphoproteomics. This brief review will focus on the role of pathologists in developing various techniques and guiding targeted therapies during the era of personalized medicine.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Terapia Molecular Dirigida/historia , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Patólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Neoplasias/patología , Pronóstico
3.
EBioMedicine ; 70: 103492, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34280779

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are clinically significant in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Although a standardized methodology for visual TILs assessment (VTA) exists, it has several inherent limitations. We established a deep learning-based computational TIL assessment (CTA) method broadly following VTA guideline and compared it with VTA for TNBC to determine the prognostic value of the CTA and a reasonable CTA workflow for clinical practice. METHODS: We trained three deep neural networks for nuclei segmentation, nuclei classification and necrosis classification to establish a CTA workflow. The automatic TIL (aTIL) score generated was compared with manual TIL (mTIL) scores provided by three pathologists in an Asian (n = 184) and a Caucasian (n = 117) TNBC cohort to evaluate scoring concordance and prognostic value. FINDINGS: The intraclass correlations (ICCs) between aTILs and mTILs varied from 0.40 to 0.70 in two cohorts. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed that the aTIL score was associated with disease free survival (DFS) in both cohorts, as either a continuous [hazard ratio (HR)=0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.99] or dichotomous variable (HR=0.29, 95% CI 0.12-0.72). A higher C-index was observed in a composite mTIL/aTIL three-tier stratification model than in the dichotomous model, using either mTILs or aTILs alone. INTERPRETATION: The current study provides a useful tool for stromal TIL assessment and prognosis evaluation for patients with TNBC. A workflow integrating both VTA and CTA may aid pathologists in performing risk management and decision-making tasks. FUNDING: National Natural Science Foundation of China, Guangdong Medical Research Foundation, Guangdong Natural Science Foundation.


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico por Computador/métodos , Linfocitos Infiltrantes de Tumor/patología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/diagnóstico , Aprendizaje Profundo , Diagnóstico por Computador/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Patólogos/normas , Patólogos/estadística & datos numéricos
4.
J Surg Res ; 265: 259-264, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33964635

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) appendicitis severity grading criteria use independent subscales for radiologists (Rad), surgeons (Surg), and pathologists (Path). We reviewed the EAST Multicenter Study of the Treatment of Appendicitis in America: Acute, Perforated, and Gangrenous (MUSTANG) database to determine rates of discordance and clinical consequences of inaccuracy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A confusion matrix was constructed for pairs among Rad, Surg, and Path. Accuracy was reported using chronologically latest diagnosis as gold standard. "Concordance" (C) was achieved when both agreed on the severity grade and "Discordance"(D) when they disagreed. A composite endpoint("COMP"= 30-d incidence of surgical site infection, abscess, wound complication, Clavien-Dindo complication, secondary intervention, ED[Emergency Department] visit, hospital readmission, and mortality) was compared between C versus D groups via χ2 test with Bonferroni correction to define statistical significance(P = 0.05/9 = 0.005). RESULTS: For each pair and diagnosis, subjects were categorized as C or D and compared for the incidence of COMP. Incidence of COMP for Surg and/or Path in C versus D: 16% versus. 26% (p = 0.006, NS by Bonferroni) for acute (A), 39% versus 33% (p = 0.39) for gangrenous (G), and 48% versus 37% (p = 0.035, NS by Bonferroni) for perforated (P). For Rad and/or Path in C versus. D: 17% versus 42% (p < 0.001) for A, 27% versus 31% (p = 0.95) for G, and 56% versus 48% (p = 0.48) for P. For C versus D: 17% versus 40% (p < 0.001) for A, 36% versus 26% (p = 0.43) for G, and 51% versus 39% (p = 0.29) for P. CONCLUSIONS: In appendicitis treated by appendectomy, surgeons are most accurate at diagnosing acute appendicitis and least accurate at diagnosing gangrenous. Radiologists are less accurate for all categories. When the surgeon is wrong, clinical outcomes are not significantly worse. However, when the radiologist is wrong about acute appendicitis, patients have worse clinical outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Apendicitis , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Patólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirujanos/estadística & datos numéricos
5.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 156(5): 810-817, 2021 Oct 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33940599

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Pathology services are limited in most areas of sub-Saharan Africa. This study's aim was to survey anatomic and clinical pathology services and laboratory infrastructure in Mozambique. METHODS: A survey was conducted from October-December 2018 across the four central hospitals of Mozambique to determine infrastructure and pathology services available. RESULTS: Most laboratory/pathology services in Mozambique are limited to the four central hospitals. Only 14 pathologists practice in the country despite a population of 29.5 million for the world's fifth worst workforce/population ratio. Approximately 35,000 anatomic pathology specimens are evaluated annually. Standard services across chemistry, hematology, microbiology, and blood bank are available at the four central hospitals. Esoteric laboratory testing and immunohistochemistry are generally only available in Maputo. CONCLUSIONS: While most pathology services are available in Mozambique, many are available only at the Maputo laboratory. Expansion of pathology services and infrastructure will improve provision of effective and efficient health care as access to timely and accurate clinical diagnoses increases in Mozambique.


Asunto(s)
Laboratorios de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Patólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Patología Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Países en Desarrollo , Humanos , Mozambique , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
6.
Ann Diagn Pathol ; 52: 151738, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33865185

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The TNM staging system is the main prognostic tool for GC, but the number of metastatic lymph nodes (LN) can be affected by surgical, pathological, tumor or host factors. Several authors have shown that lymph node ratio (LNR) may be superior to TNM staging in GC. However, cut-off values vary between studies and LNR assessment is not standardized. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study of all GC resected in a western tertiary center (N = 377). Clinical features were collected and pathological features were assessed by two independent pathologists. Eight LNR classifications were selected and applied to our patients. Statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: 315 patients were included. Most tumors were T3 (49.2%) N+ (59.3%). During follow-up, 36.7% of patients progressed and 27.4% died due to tumor. All LNR classifications were significantly associated with clinicopathological features such as Laurén subtype, lymphovascular invasion, perineural infiltration, T stage, tumor progression or death. All LNR classifications were independent prognostic factors for OS and DFS, and ROC analyses calculated similar AUC values for all staging systems. Kaplan-Meier curves showed that Pedrazzani, Wang, Liu and Huang classifications stratified patients better into three (Pedrazzani) or four categories. These classifications tended to downstage TNM N2 and N3 tumors. In cases with less than 16 LNs resected, Pedrazzani and Wang classifications showed the best prognostic performance. CONCLUSIONS: Pedrazzani, Wang, Liu and Huang classifications showed good prognostic performance in western GC patients. Larger studies in other cohorts are needed to identify the most consistent LNR classification for GC.


Asunto(s)
Índice Ganglionar/clasificación , Invasividad Neoplásica/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Índice Ganglionar/métodos , Metástasis Linfática/patología , Masculino , Márgenes de Escisión , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias/métodos , Patólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Estándares de Referencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , España/epidemiología , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Centros de Atención Terciaria
7.
J Am Coll Surg ; 232(6): 935-945.e2, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33887486

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Surgically assessed pancreatic texture has been identified as the strongest predictor of postoperative pancreatic fistula. However, texture is a subjective parameter with no proven reliability or validity. Therefore, a more objective parameter is needed. In this study, we evaluated the fibrosis level at the pancreatic neck resection margin and correlated fibrosis and all clinico-pathologic parameters collected over the course of the Pancreatogastrostomy vs Pancreatojejunostomy for RECOnstruction (RECOPANC) study. STUDY DESIGN: The RECOPANC trial was a multicenter randomized prospective trial of patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy. There were 261 hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides allocated for histopathologic analyses. Pancreatic fibrosis was scored from 0 to III (no fibrosis up to severe fibrosis) by 2 blinded independent pathologists. All variables possibly associated with POPF were entered into a generalized linear model for multivariable analysis. RESULTS: The fibrosis grade and pancreatic texture were scored in all 261 patients. In POPF B/C (postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B or C) patients, 71% had a soft pancreas, and fibrosis grades were distributed as follows: 48% with score 0, 28% with score I, 20% with score II, and 7% with score III, respectively. Fibrosis grading showed substantial inter-rater reliability (kappa = 0.74) and correlated positively with hard pancreatic texture (p < 0.05). In univariable analysis, area under the curve (AUC) for POPF B/C prediction was higher for fibrosis grade than for pancreatic texture (0.71 vs 0.59). In multivariate analysis, the following predictors were selected: sex, surgeon volume, pancreatic texture, and fibrosis grade. However, the addition of pancreatic texture only led to an incremental improvement (AUC 0.794 vs 0.819). CONCLUSIONS: Histologically evaluated pancreatic fibrosis is an easily applicable and highly reproducible POPF predictor and superior to surgically evaluated pancreatic texture. Future studies might use fibrosis grade for risk stratification in pancreatoduodenectomy.


Asunto(s)
Páncreas/patología , Fístula Pancreática/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Fibrosis , Humanos , Masculino , Márgenes de Escisión , Persona de Mediana Edad , Páncreas/cirugía , Fístula Pancreática/etiología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Patólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores de Riesgo , Cirujanos/estadística & datos numéricos
8.
Ann Diagn Pathol ; 52: 151733, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33780691

RESUMEN

Among four sub-patterns of Gleason grade 4 prostate cancer, voluminous evidence supports that the cribriform pattern holds an unfavorable prognostic impact, as compared with poorly-formed, fused, or glomeruloid. The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) recommends specifying whether invasive grade 4 cancer is cribriform. Recently, ISUP experts published a consensus definition of cribriform pattern highlighting criteria that distinguish it from mimickers. The current study aimed to analyze morphologic features separately to identify those that define the essence of the cribriform pattern. Thirty-two selected photomicrographs were classified by 12 urologic pathologists as: definitely cribriform cancer, probably cribriform, unsure, probably not cribriform, or definitely not cribriform. Consensus was defined as 9/12 agree or disagree, with ≤1 strongly supporting the opposite choice. Final consensus was achieved in 21 of 32 cases. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) model with logit link was fitted to estimate effect of multiple morphologic predictors. Fisher exact test was used for categorical findings. Presence of intervening stroma precluded calling cribriform cancer (p = 0.006). Mucin presence detracted (p = 0.003) from willingness to call cribriform cancer (only 3 cases had mucin). Lumen number was associated with cribriform consensus (p = 0.0006), and all consensus cases had ≥9 lumens. Predominant papillary pattern or an irregular outer boundary detracted (p = NS). Invasive cribriform carcinoma should have absence of intervening stroma, and usually neither papillary pattern, irregular outer boundary, nor very few lumens. Setting the criteria for cribriform will help prevent over- or undercalling this important finding.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/patología , Clasificación del Tumor/métodos , Invasividad Neoplásica/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/metabolismo , Consenso , Humanos , Masculino , Mucinas/metabolismo , Patólogos/organización & administración , Patólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Fotomicrografía/métodos , Fotomicrografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Pronóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/clasificación , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/metabolismo , Sociedades Médicas/organización & administración , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Urólogos/organización & administración , Urólogos/estadística & datos numéricos
9.
J Cutan Pathol ; 48(7): 833-836, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33605464

RESUMEN

Since the first description of parapsoriasis more than 100 years ago, parapsoriasis has been a questionable condition and occasionally considered a precursor of cutaneous lymphoma. The name "parapsoriasis" is related to a heterogenous group of diseases that show a distinct clinical presentation; however, the histopathological criteria are not strongly specific. Pathologists do not consider parapsoriasis as a possible histopathological diagnosis, but dermatologists use the term as clinical hypothesis. We aim to provide an historical review of parapsoriasis focusing on histopathological criteria, considering its possible relation with cutaneous skin lymphoma, based on articles from PubMed and standard dermatopathological books. Parapsoriasis does not have well-defined histopathological criteria, so its use should be avoided. Being aware of parapsoriasis complexity, a consensus meeting can help to create a guideline regarding this topic.


Asunto(s)
Dermatología/normas , Micosis Fungoide/patología , Parapsoriasis/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Evolución Clonal/genética , Consenso , Historia del Siglo XX , Humanos , Linfoma Cutáneo de Células T/diagnóstico , Micosis Fungoide/diagnóstico , Parapsoriasis/diagnóstico , Parapsoriasis/historia , Patólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Vocabulario
10.
J Cutan Pathol ; 48(8): 1010-1019, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33576022

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Novel solutions are needed for expediting margin assessment to guide basal cell carcinoma (BCC) surgeries. Ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM) is starting to be used in freshly excised surgical specimens to examine BCC margins in real time. Training and educational process are needed for this novel technology to be implemented into clinic. OBJECTIVE: To test a training and reading process, and measure diagnostic accuracy of clinicians with varying expertise level in reading ex vivo FCM images. METHODS: An international three-center study was designed for training and reading to assess BCC surgical margins and residual subtypes. Each center included a lead dermatologic/Mohs surgeon (clinical developer of FCM) and three additional readers (dermatologist, dermatopathologist, dermatologic/Mohs surgeon), who use confocal in clinical practice. Testing was conducted on 30 samples. RESULTS: Overall, the readers achieved 90% average sensitivity, 78% average specificity in detecting residual BCC margins, showing high and consistent diagnostic reading accuracy. Those with expertise in dermatologic surgery and dermatopathology showed the strongest potential for learning to assess FCM images. LIMITATIONS: Small dataset, variability in mosaic quality between centers. CONCLUSION: Suggested process is feasible and effective. This process is proposed for wider implementation to facilitate wider adoption of FCM to potentially expedite BCC margin assessment to guide surgery in real time.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Basocelular/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Basocelular/cirugía , Microscopía Confocal/instrumentación , Preceptoría/métodos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Dermatólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Fluorescencia , Humanos , Márgenes de Escisión , Cirugía de Mohs/estadística & datos numéricos , Patólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Lectura , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
11.
J Cutan Pathol ; 48(9): 1109-1114, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33635594

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous histopathologic diagnoses in children often differ from those in adults. Depending on practice setting, these specimens may be evaluated by dermatopathologists or pediatric pathologists. We sought to determine whether comfort level with pediatric dermatopathology is associated with prior training, pediatric dermatopathology exposure during fellowship, career duration, or specimen subtype. METHODS: We surveyed dermatopathologists and pediatric pathologists practicing in the United States. Training and practice variables were evaluated by multivariable regression for association with comfort level. RESULTS: Of the 156 respondents, 72% were dermatopathologists (response rate 11.6%) and 28% were pediatric pathologists (response rate 9.3%). Dermatopathologists reported higher comfort overall (P < .001); this was also true for inflammatory dermatoses and melanocytic neoplasms (P < .001). Thirty-four percent and 75% of dermatopathologists and pediatric pathologists, respectively, reported lower comfort with pediatric skin specimens than their usual cases. Pediatric pathologists were 28% more likely to refer these cases to colleagues. Among dermatopathologists, dermatology-trained were more comfortable than pathology-trained colleagues interpreting inflammatory dermatoses (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Pathologists' comfort with pediatric dermatopathology varied significantly based upon prior training, career duration, and specimen subtype. These results suggest opportunities for improving education in this domain.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Dermatólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Patólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Manejo de Especímenes/psicología , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Becas , Humanos , Melanocitos/patología , Melanoma/patología , Pediatría/tendencias , Derivación y Consulta , Autoeficacia , Piel/patología , Enfermedades de la Piel/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Piel/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
13.
Pulmonology ; 27(1): 7-13, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32561352

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, progressive fibrotic interstitial lung disease of unknown cause, which predominantly manifests in older males. IPF diagnosis is a complex, multi-step process and delay in diagnosis cause a negative impact on patient survival. Additionally, a multidisciplinary team of pulmonologists, radiologists and pathologists is necessary for an accurate IPF diagnosis. The present study aims to assess how diagnosis and treatment of IPF are followed in Portugal, as well as the knowledge and implementation of therapeutic guidelines adopted by the Portuguese Society of Pulmonology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-eight practicing pulmonologists were enrolled (May-August 2019) in a survey developed by IPF expert pulmonologists comprised of one round of 31 questions structured in three parts. The first part was related to participant professional profile, the second part assessed participant level of knowledge and practice agreement with national consensus and international guidelines for IPF as well as their access to radiology and pathology for IPF diagnosis, and the third part was a self-evaluation of the guidelines adherence for diagnosis and treatment in their daily practice. RESULTS: Participants represented a wide spectrum of pulmonologists from 14 districts of Portugal and autonomous regions of Azores and Madeira. The majority were female (65%), with 5-19 years of experience (71%) and working in a public clinical center (83%). Importantly, the majority of pulmonologists follow their IPF patients (n=45) themselves, while 26% referred IPF patients to ILD experts in the same hospital and 22% to another center. Almost all pulmonologists (98%) agreed or absolutely agreed that multidisciplinary discussion is recommended to accurately diagnose IPF. No pulmonologists considered pulmonary biopsy as absolutely required to establish an IPF diagnosis. However, 87% agreed or absolutely agree with considering biopsy in a possible/probable UIP context. If a biopsy is necessary, 96% of pulmonologists absolutely agree or agree with considering criobiopsy as an option for IPF diagnosis. Regarding IPF treatment, 98% absolutely agreed or agreed that antifibrotic therapy should be started once the IPF diagnosis is established. Finally, 76% stated that 6 months is the recommended time for follow-up visit in IPF patients. CONCLUSIONS: Portuguese pulmonologists understand and agree with national consensus and international guidelines for IPF treatment but their implementation in Portugal is heterogeneous.


Asunto(s)
Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/diagnóstico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Neumólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Concienciación , Biopsia , Consenso , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/epidemiología , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/terapia , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Pulmón/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Patólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Portugal/epidemiología , Neumólogos/organización & administración , Radiólogos/estadística & datos numéricos
14.
Cancer Rep (Hoboken) ; 4(1): e1297, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33030308

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is significant variation in attitude both towards the role of microsatellite instability (MSI) in predicting prognosis, and towards its role in guiding which Stage II colon cancer patients may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. AIM: To examine the current status of specialist attitudes towards MSI in guiding prognosis and adjuvant therapy in stage II colon cancer. METHODS: The Pathology in Colon Cancer, Prognosis and Uptake of Adjuvant Therapy (PiCC UP) Australia and New Zealand questionnaire was distributed to colorectal surgeons, medical oncologists and pathologists after institutional board approval. A 5-scale Likert score was used to assess attitudes towards 23 pathological features for prognosis and 18 features for adjuvant therapy. Data were analysed using a rating scale and graded response model in item response theory (IRT) on STATA (Stata MP, version 15; StataCorp LP). RESULTS: 164 specialists (45 oncologists, 86 surgeons and 33 pathologists) participated. 80.5% regularly attended colorectal multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings. 89.63% and 59.26% of specialists reported that MSI status was likely or definitely to influence prognosis in colon cancer and recommendations for adjuvant therapy in Stage II colon cancer respectively. IRT modelling was achieved in 17 pathological features for prognosis. MSI IRT score was 4.47 (95% CI: 4.05-4.68). IRT modelling was achieved in 10 pathological features for adjuvant therapy. MSI IRT score was 3.62 (2.89-4.15). MSI ranked 10 (of 17) in order of importance in determining prognosis and ranked three (of 10) in guiding adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSION: MSI status is considered an important biomarker when selecting patients for adjuvant therapy in Stage II colon cancer. MSI is also considered useful in prognostication of colon cancer. MSI status was ranked similar to the tumour grade of differentiation and the presence of perineural invasion.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Colectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias del Colon/terapia , Inestabilidad de Microsatélites , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Australasia/epidemiología , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas/métodos , Neoplasias del Colon/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Colon/genética , Neoplasias del Colon/mortalidad , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Invasividad Neoplásica/genética , Invasividad Neoplásica/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Oncólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Patólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pronóstico , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirujanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos
15.
Clin Cancer Res ; 27(3): 719-728, 2021 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33172897

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Gastric cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in Northeast Asia. Population-based endoscopic screenings in the region have yielded successful results in early detection of gastric tumors. Endoscopic screening rates are continuously increasing, and there is a need for an automatic computerized diagnostic system to reduce the diagnostic burden. In this study, we developed an algorithm to classify gastric epithelial tumors automatically and assessed its performance in a large series of gastric biopsies and its benefits as an assistance tool. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Using 2,434 whole-slide images, we developed an algorithm based on convolutional neural networks to classify a gastric biopsy image into one of three categories: negative for dysplasia (NFD), tubular adenoma, or carcinoma. The performance of the algorithm was evaluated by using 7,440 biopsy specimens collected prospectively. The impact of algorithm-assisted diagnosis was assessed by six pathologists using 150 gastric biopsy cases. RESULTS: Diagnostic performance evaluated by the AUROC curve in the prospective study was 0.9790 for two-tier classification: negative (NFD) versus positive (all cases except NFD). When limited to epithelial tumors, the sensitivity and specificity were 1.000 and 0.9749. Algorithm-assisted digital image viewer (DV) resulted in 47% reduction in review time per image compared with DV only and 58% decrease to microscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Our algorithm has demonstrated high accuracy in classifying epithelial tumors and its benefits as an assistance tool, which can serve as a potential screening aid system in diagnosing gastric biopsy specimens.


Asunto(s)
Aprendizaje Profundo , Mucosa Gástrica/patología , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador/métodos , Patólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopsia/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Mucosa Gástrica/diagnóstico por imagen , Gastroscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología
16.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 145(6): 717-727, 2021 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32965489

RESUMEN

CONTEXT.­: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is a clinical syndrome characterized by the presence of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) radiologically and pathologically. Per consensus criteria adopted in 2011, diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis no longer requires a biopsy in an appropriate context if UIP is seen on imaging. As a result, lung biopsies are now typically reserved for patients having indeterminate clinical or imaging findings or suspicion for alternative diagnoses, but the impact of updated guidelines on pathology practice remains unclear. OBJECTIVE.­: To determine the frequency of histologic UIP before and after 2011. DESIGN.­: Surgical lung biopsies from adults were studied within two 4-year periods: July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2010 and January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2015. Pathology slides were reviewed in a fashion blinded to clinical information and were classified using current guidelines. RESULTS.­: Biopsies from 177 and 86 patients (mean [SD] age, 62 [12] and 59 [14] years; 50.3% [89 of 177] and 48.8% [42 of 86] men) before and after 2011, respectively, were reviewed. Probable UIP or UIP was less-frequently encountered after 2011 in all patients with fibrosis (9 of 54 [16.7%] versus 41 of 119 [34.5%] before 2011, P = .02) and also in patients 50 years old and older (8 of 46 [17.4%] versus 39 of 109 [35.8%] before 2011, P = .02), with a concomitant rise in cases indeterminate for UIP or showing alternative diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS.­: Histology for UIP is less frequently encountered in our contemporary practice compared with the historic era. The pretest probability of a non-UIP diagnosis is now high, even in elderly patients, underscoring the need for pathologists to be familiar with the histologic features of alternative diagnoses.


Asunto(s)
Consenso , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/diagnóstico , Patología Quirúrgica/métodos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Anciano , Biopsia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/patología , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Pulmón/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Patólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
17.
J Cutan Pathol ; 48(6): 733-738, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32935869

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic terms used in histopathology reports of cutaneous melanocytic lesions are not standardized. We describe dermatopathologists' views regarding diverse diagnostic terminology and the utility of the Melanocytic Pathology Assessment Tool and Hierarchy for Diagnosis (MPATH-Dx) for categorizing melanocytic lesions. METHODS: July 2018-2019 survey of board-certified and/or fellowship-trained dermatopathologists with experience interpreting melanocytic lesions. RESULTS: Among 160 participants, 99% reported witnessing different terminology being used for the same melanocytic lesion. Most viewed diverse terminology as confusing to primary care physicians (98%), frustrating to pathologists (83%), requiring more of their time as a consultant (64%), and providing necessary clinical information (52%). Most perceived that adoption of the MPATH-Dx would: improve communication with other pathologists and treating physicians (87%), generally be a change for the better (80%), improve patient care (79%), be acceptable to clinical colleagues (68%), save time in pathology report documentation (53%), and protect from malpractice (51%). CONCLUSIONS: Most dermatopathologists view diverse terminology as contributing to miscommunication with clinicians and patients, adversely impacting patient care. They view the MPATH-Dx as a promising tool to standardize terminology and improve communication. The MPATH-Dx may be a useful supplement to conventional pathology reports. Further revision and refinement are necessary for widespread clinical use.


Asunto(s)
Clasificación/métodos , Melanocitos/patología , Melanoma/clasificación , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Adulto , Dermatólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Errores Diagnósticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Becas , Femenino , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Masculino , Mala Praxis/estadística & datos numéricos , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Melanoma/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Patólogos/psicología , Patólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos de Atención Primaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Estándares de Referencia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Terminología como Asunto
18.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 313(2): 101-108, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32338293

RESUMEN

Histopathologic assessment of melanocytic neoplasms is the current gold standard of diagnosis. However, there are well recognized limitations including inter-observer diagnostic discordance. This study aimed to determine if integrating dermoscopy with histopathology of melanocytic neoplasms impacts diagnosis and improves inter-observer agreement. We conducted a prospective cohort study in a pigmented lesion clinic. Consecutive melanocytic lesions were identified for biopsy based on atypical gross or dermoscopic features. Standardized immunohistochemistry and levels were ordered on each specimen. The cases were randomized. Three dermatopathologists blinded to the clinical impression assessed each lesion. The cases were then re-randomized and re-assessed with addition of gross clinical and dermoscopic images. Inter-rater reliability (IRR) using Fleiss' kappa statistic revealed an increase from 0.447 without to 0.496 with dermoscopy amongst all dermatopathologists. The kappa increased from 0.495 before to 0.511 with dermoscopy in separating high-grade atypia or melanoma from moderate atypia or less. In 16 of 136 cases, at least 2 of 3 dermatopathologists favored a diagnosis of melanoma only after dermoscopy. In total, the consensus grade of atypia changed in 24.3% (33/ 136) of cases thereby representing changes to excisional margins and patient follow up. This study is limited by the cohort size. Dermoscopy significantly impacts diagnosis and improves identification of early melanomas in high risk populations and improves inter-observer agreement.


Asunto(s)
Dermoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Nevo Pigmentado/diagnóstico , Patólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Biopsia/estadística & datos numéricos , Consenso , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Masculino , Márgenes de Escisión , Melanoma/patología , Melanoma/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nevo Pigmentado/patología , Nevo Pigmentado/cirugía , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Patólogos/normas , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Piel/diagnóstico por imagen , Piel/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/cirugía , Adulto Joven
19.
Arch Dis Child ; 106(3): 291-293, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32349979

RESUMEN

AIM: To provide a further insight into the usefulness of lung biopsy in children. METHODS: Lung biopsies in children from January 2007 to December 2017 were reviewed (n=39). The histology results were categorised as: definitive diagnosis, normal lung parenchyma, inconclusive. RESULTS: Lung biopsy provided a definitive diagnosis in 25 (64%) cases. A suspected diagnosis was confirmed in 16 (41%) and a new diagnosis was found in 9 (23%) children. Histology was inconclusive in 11 (28%) cases and normal in 3 (8%). Fifteen (38%) children had treatment altered due to the biopsy result. CONCLUSION: Lung biopsy mostly confirmed the suspected diagnosis and was associated with a low procedure related morbidity (n=1) and mortality (n=0). Importantly, the biopsy result identified a pathology which altered treatment in over one third of patients. However, in a number of cases the histology was inconclusive, therefore careful patient selection is recommended to maximise diagnostic yield.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia/métodos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Quirúrgico/mortalidad , Pulmón/patología , Selección de Paciente/ética , Adolescente , Biopsia/efectos adversos , Biopsia/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Preescolar , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Quirúrgico/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Tempo Operativo , Patólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Toracoscopía/métodos , Toracoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos
20.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 155(5): 674-679, 2021 04 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33210114

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Quantifying pathologist participation in Medicare services may be informative for the prediction of future workforce needs and reimbursement. METHODS: A retrospective examination was performed of pathologist professional (Part B) Medicare billings and payments from 2012 to 2017. The Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data: Physician and Other Supplier Public Use File was the primary data source. RESULTS: From 2012 to 2017, there was an increase (3.7%; 11,215 up to 11,627) in pathologists providing Medicare Part B services. Female pathologists increased from 36.10% to 40.8% of pathologists during this time period. Normalized per pathologist, there was an increase (7.8%; 1,382 up to 1,489) in beneficiaries served as well as an increase (4.1%; 2,442 up to 2,543) in services performed. The top 10 pathology Part B services performed in a facility were all surgical pathology. Although services increased, the overall payment of Part B pathology services decreased (3%; $996,519,358 down to $966,615,856) during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is increasing pathologist participation in Medicare, the workload per pathologist has increased.


Asunto(s)
Medicare/economía , Patólogos/economía , Factores Sexuales , Recursos Humanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Patólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...