RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recent studies highlight the importance of physician readiness to practice beyond graduate training. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education mandates that pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) fellows be prepared for independent practice by allowing "progressive responsibility for patient care." Prior unpublished surveys of program directors (PDs) indicate variability in approaches to provide opportunities for more independent practice during fellowship training. OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to describe practices within PEM fellowship programs allowing fellows to work without direct supervision and to identify any barriers to independent practice in training. DESIGN/METHODS: An anonymous electronic survey of PEM fellowship PDs was performed. Survey items were developed using an iterative modified Delphi process and pilot tested. Close-ended survey responses and demographic variables were summarized with descriptive statistics. Responses to open-ended survey items were reviewed and categorized by theme. RESULTS: Seventy two of 84 PDs (88%) responded to the survey; however, not all surveys were completed. Of the 68 responses to whether fellows could work without direct supervision (as defined by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education) during some part of their training, 31 (45.6%) reported that fellows did have this opportunity. In most programs, clinical independence was conditional on specific measures including the number of clinical hours completed, milestone achievement, and approval by the clinical competency committee. Reported barriers to fellow practice without direct oversight included both regulatory and economic constraints. CONCLUSIONS: Current training practices that provide PEM fellows with conditional clinical independence are variable. Future work should aim to determine best practices of entrustment, identify ideal transition points, and mitigate barriers to graduated responsibility.
Assuntos
Medicina de Emergência , Medicina de Emergência Pediátrica , Criança , Competência Clínica , Currículo , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Medicina de Emergência/educação , Bolsas de Estudo , Humanos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Thirty million pediatric visits (<18 years old) occur across 5,000 US emergency departments (EDs) each year, with most of these cases presenting to community EDs. Simulation-based training is an effective method to improve and sustain EDs' readiness to triage and stabilize critically ill infants and children, but large simulation centers are mostly concentrated at academic hospitals. The use of pediatric simulation-based training has been limited in the community ED setting due to the high cost of equipment and limited access to content experts in pediatric critical care. We designed an innovative "off-the-shelf" simulation-based training resource, "American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) SimBox," that provides a free low-technology manikin along with teaching aids and train-the-trainer materials to community EDs to run a simulation drill in their own workspaces with local educators. The goal was to develop an "off-the-shelf," free, open-access, simulation-based resource to improve the readiness of community EDs to triage, resuscitate, and transfer critically ill infants as measured by presimulation and postsimulation surveys measuring opinions regarding the scenario, session experience, and most valuable aspect of the session. Between January 2018 and December 2019, 179 ACEP SimBoxes were shipped across the United States, reaching 36 of 50 states. Facilitators and participants who completed the postsimulation survey evaluated the session as a valuable use of their time. All facilitator respondents reported that the low-technology manikins, paired with their institution-specific equipment, were sufficient for learning, thus reducing costs. All participant respondents reported an increased commitment to pediatric readiness for their ED after completing the simulation session. This innovation resulted in the implementation of a unique simulation-based training intervention across many community EDs in the United States. The ACEP SimBox innovation demonstrates that an easy to use and unique simulation-based training tool can be developed, distributed, and implemented across many community EDs in the United States to help improve community ED pediatric readiness.
Assuntos
Difusão de Inovações , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/normas , Pessoal de Saúde/educação , Treinamento por Simulação/métodos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Conferências de Consenso como Assunto , Estado Terminal/terapia , Currículo , Humanos , Lactente , Manequins , Pediatria/educação , Desenvolvimento de ProgramasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pediatric patients undergoing transabdominal pelvic ultrasound require a full bladder as an acoustic window. Patients are typically relied upon to subjectively identify bladder fullness, but inaccurate reporting often leads to delays in test results, diagnosis, and treatment. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to objectively evaluate bladder fullness by comparing the height of the bladder to the height of the uterus on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). Our hypothesis was that this method would result in faster time to imaging and decrease emergency department length of stay (ED LOS). METHODS: Bladder fullness was assessed using POCUS every 30 min until the bladder was full. If the height of the bladder was equal to or greater than the height of the uterus in the sagittal view, the bladder was considered full. The POCUS group was compared with a control group that relied solely on patients' self-identified bladder fullness. RESULTS: Females aged 8-18 years old with pelvic pain in the pediatric ED were included in the study. Forty POCUS patients were compared with a control group of 105 patients. The POCUS group demonstrated a decrease in time to pelvic imaging by 38.7 min (95% confidence interval -59.2 to -18.2; p < 0.0001) and a decrease in LOS by 49.2 min (95% CI -89.7 to -8.61; pâ¯=â¯0.004). There was poor overall agreement on bladder fullness between patient's subjective sensation and POCUS (kâ¯=â¯0.04). CONCLUSION: POCUS to evaluate bladder fullness by comparing the height of the bladder with the height of the uterus reduces time to pelvic imaging and ED LOS.
Assuntos
Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Bexiga Urinária , Adolescente , Criança , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Testes Imediatos , Ultrassonografia , Bexiga Urinária/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Personal protective equipment (PPE) is worn by health care providers (HCPs) to protect against hazardous exposures. Studies of HCPs performing critical resuscitation tasks in PPE have yielded mixed results and have not evaluated performance in care of children. We evaluated the impacts of PPE on timeliness or success of emergency procedures performed by pediatric HCPs. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted at 2 tertiary children's hospitals. For session 1, HCPs (medical doctors and registered nurses) wore normal attire; for session 2, they wore full-shroud PPE garb with 2 glove types: Ebola level or chemical. During each session, they performed clinical tasks on a patient simulator: intubation, bag-valve mask ventilation, venous catheter (IV) placement, push-pull fluid bolus, and defibrillation. Differences in completion time per task were compared. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in medical doctor completion time across sessions. For registered nurses, there was a significant difference between baseline and PPE sessions for both defibrillation and IV placement tasks. Registered nurses were faster to defibrillate in Ebola PPE and slower when wearing chemical PPE (median difference, -3.5 vs 2 seconds, respectively; P < 0.01). Registered nurse IV placement took longer in Ebola and chemical PPE (5.5 vs 42 seconds, respectively; P < 0.01). After the PPE session, participants were significantly less likely to indicate that full-body PPE interfered with procedures, was claustrophobic, or slowed them down. CONCLUSIONS: Personal protective equipment did not affect procedure timeliness or success on a simulated child, with the exception of IV placement. Further study is needed to investigate PPE's impact on procedures performed in a clinical care context.
Assuntos
Doença pelo Vírus Ebola , Equipamento de Proteção Individual , Criança , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , RessuscitaçãoRESUMO
The need for virtual education for nursing staff has dramatically increased because of social distancing measures after the coronavirus disease pandemic. Emergency departments in particular need to educate staff on caring for patients with coronavirus disease while concurrently continuing to ensure education related to core topic areas such as pediatric assessment and stabilization. Unfortunately, many nurse educators are currently unable to provide traditional in-person education and training to their nursing staff. Our inter-professional team aimed to address this through the rapid development and implementation of an emergency nursing telesimulation curriculum. This curriculum focused on the nursing assessment and initial stabilization of a child presenting to the emergency department in status epilepticus. This article describes the rapid development and implementation of a pediatric emergency nursing telesimulation. Our objectives in this article are (1) to describe the rapid creation of this curriculum using Kern's framework, (2) to describe the implementation of a fully online simulation-based pediatric emergency training intervention for nurse learners, and (3) to report learners' satisfaction with and feedback on this intervention.
Assuntos
Enfermagem em Emergência/educação , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros , Treinamento por Simulação , Telemedicina , Criança , Currículo , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Humanos , Enfermagem PediátricaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine whether personal protective equipment (PPE) results in deterioration in chest compression (CC) quality and greater fatigue for administering health care providers (HCPs). METHODS: In this multicenter study, HCPs completed 2 sessions. In session 1 (baseline), HCPs wore normal attire; in session 2, HCPs donned full PPE. During each session, they performed 5 minutes of uninterrupted CCs on a child manikin. Chest compression rate, depth, and release velocity were reported in ten 30-second epochs. Change in CC parameters and self-reported fatigue were measured between the start and 2- and 5-minute epochs. RESULTS: We enrolled 108 HCPs (prehospital and in-hospital providers). The median CC rate did not change significantly between epochs 1 and 10 during baseline sessions. Median CC depth and release velocity decreased for 5 minutes with PPE. There were no significant differences in CC parameters between baseline and PPE sessions in any provider group. Median fatigue scores during baseline sessions were 2 (at start), 4 (at 2 minutes), and 6 (at 5 minutes). There was a significantly higher median fatigue score between 0 and 5 minutes in both study sessions and in all groups. Fatigue scores were significantly higher for providers wearing PPE compared with baseline specifically among prehospital providers. CONCLUSIONS: During a clinically appropriate 2-minute period, neither CC quality nor self-reported fatigue worsened to a significant degree in providers wearing PPE. Our data suggest that Pediatric Basic Life Support recommendations for CC providers to switch every 2 minutes need not be altered with PPE use.
Assuntos
Reanimação Cardiopulmonar/normas , Pediatria/normas , Equipamento de Proteção Individual , Adulto , Fadiga , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Manequins , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scale is one of the most widely utilized observational pain assessment scales in clinical practice. Although designed and validated to assess postoperative pain, the tool is currently applied to assess acute pain in multiple settings, including the emergency department. Scarce literature exists evaluating the reliability of the FLACC scale in the nonsurgical population and none in the emergency department. We sought to investigate the reliability of the FLACC scale in assessing acute pain in the pediatric emergency department and to examine the sensitivity of FLACC scores after the administration of analgesia. METHODS: In phase 1 of this prospective study, a series of 2 independent evaluators, blinded to each other's evaluations, scored 66 patients using the FLACC tool. Degree of concordance among the 6 dyads was used to measure interrater reliability. In phase 2, FLACC scores were obtained just before the administration of analgesia in 35 patients and measured at 30 and at 60 minutes after administration. RESULTS: Among the 6 dyads of evaluators, Kendall W demonstrated a strong concordance (27 of 30 measures; range, 0.63-1.00) for individual components of the scale and for the composite scores (range, 0.85-0.96). Significant mean reductions from preanalgesia FLACC scores [5.54; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.79-6.30] were seen at 30 minutes (2.00; 95% CI, 1.61-2.39) and 60 minutes (1.14; 95% CI, 0.79-1.50) postanalgesia (P < 0.0001 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: The FLACC scale demonstrated high interrater reliability for both individual FLACC items and total scores in a convenience sample of patients aged 6 months to 5 years in a pediatric emergency department. It seems to be an appropriate observational tool to assess acute pain in this population.
Assuntos
Dor Aguda/diagnóstico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Medição da Dor/métodos , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
This article is the third in a 7-part series that aims to comprehensively describe the current state and future directions of pediatric emergency medicine fellowship training from the essential requirements to considerations for successfully administering and managing a program to the careers that may be anticipated upon program completion. This article focuses on the skills beyond clinical training required of pediatric emergency medicine physicians including teaching, leadership, teamwork, and communication.
Assuntos
Medicina de Emergência/educação , Pediatria/educação , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Bolsas de Estudo , Humanos , Liderança , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Medicina de Emergência Pediátrica/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
This article is the sixth in a 7-part series that aims to comprehensively describe the current state and future directions of pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) fellowship training from the essential requirements to considerations for successfully administering and managing a program to the careers that may be anticipated upon program completion. This article provides a broad overview of administering and supervising a PEM fellowship program. It explores 3 topics: the principles of program administration, committee management, and recommendations for minimum time allocated for PEM fellowship program directors to administer their programs.
Assuntos
Medicina de Emergência/educação , Medicina de Emergência Pediátrica/organização & administração , Pediatria/educação , Currículo , Avaliação Educacional , Bolsas de Estudo , Humanos , Internato e Residência , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados UnidosRESUMO
This article is the first in a 7-part series (Table 1) that aims to comprehensively describe the current state and future directions of pediatric emergency medicine fellowship training from the essential requirements to considerations for successfully administering and managing a program to the careers that may be anticipated on program completion. This overview article provides a framework for the series.
Assuntos
Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Medicina de Emergência/educação , Bolsas de Estudo , Pediatria/educação , Currículo , Avaliação Educacional , Humanos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
This article is the second in a 7-part series that aims to comprehensively describe the current state and future directions of pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) fellowship training from the essential requirements to considerations for successfully administering and managing a program to the careers that may be anticipated upon program completion. This article describes the development of PEM entrustable professional activities (EPAs) and the relationship of these EPAs with existing taxonomies of assessment and learning within PEM fellowship. It summarizes the field in concepts that can be taught and assessed, packaging the PEM subspecialty into EPAs.
Assuntos
Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Medicina de Emergência/educação , Bolsas de Estudo , Pediatria/educação , Prática Profissional , Humanos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Approximately 14â 000 pediatric out-of-hospital arrests occur annually. With this significant number and the diversity in the training backgrounds of medical providers, correct choice and placement of defibrillator pads are imperative to ensure maximum efficacy. METHODS: One hundred fifty-two emergency medical care providers from 6 medical fields were recruited for the study. Each participant answered a series of questions to ascertain baseline knowledge of correct defibrillator pad choice and placement in 2 scenarios with mannequins weighted less than 15 kg and more than 15kg. After the testing, each participant received an educational intervention. Six months after the first phase, participants received a questionnaire to ascertain knowledge retention. RESULTS: In the primary study phase, for correct pad choice for mannequins weighing less than 15 kg and more than 15 kg, overall results were 98% (95% confidence interval [CI], 94.1%-100%) and 38.8% (95% CI, 31.4%-46.8%), respectively. In the second phase, pad choices for mannequins weighing less than 15 kg and more than 15 kg were 77.3% (95% CI, 68.6%-84.2%) and 60% (95% CI, 47.7%-71.1%). The rates of correct pad placement during the initial phase for mannequins weighing less than 15 kg and more than 15 kg were 5.8% (95% CI, 2.8%-11.2%) and 25.7%, respectively (95% CI, 19.4%-35.7%). Rates for correct pad placement (<15-kg and >15-kg mannequins) improved in the second phase to 68.2% (95% CI, 56%-78.4%) and 71.2% (95% CI, 62.8%-81.5%). CONCLUSION: Pediatric emergency providers have poor understanding of pad choice and placement. Emergency medical care providers for children who are educated about the correct defibrillator pad choices and placement have improved knowledge and can retain that knowledge for at least 6months.
Assuntos
Desfibriladores , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/métodos , Pessoal de Saúde/educação , Criança , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/normas , Humanos , Manequins , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/terapiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Few studies have described the current clinical practices, adherence to guidelines, and outcomes of newborn resuscitations attended by emergency medical services (EMS). SimBox, a novel, video-augmented simulation, was used to describe the adherence of prehospital providers to Neonatal Resuscitation Program guidelines, to measure satisfaction with the simulation intervention, and to describe the self-reported improvement in knowledge, skills, and attitudes after the simulation. METHODS: A prospective observational cohort study of EMS providers was designed and conducted using SimBox, an open-access simulation platform, and facilitated by EMS educators. Clinical performance measures were collected using a five-item checklist. Simulation satisfaction measures were collected through net promoter scores. Learners' demographics, and self-reported knowledge, skills, and attitudes were measured using a retrospective survey of 25 questions. RESULTS: In total, 33 facilitator and 55 learner surveys were collected across Connecticut, Colorado, and Alaska between July 2021 and September 2022. At least one deviation from clinical guidelines occurred in 22/30 (73.3%) of the sessions, with 10/30 (33.3%) teams inappropriately performing chest compressions, 5/31 (16.1%) teams not warming, drying, stimulating, and suctioning the newborn, and 7/31 (22.6%) teams not performing positive pressure ventilation correctly. Lastly, 10/30 (33.3%) teams administered an incorrect dose of dextrose-containing fluids. Very high levels of satisfaction were reported with net promoter scores of 97 and 82 out of 100 for the facilitator and learner surveys, respectively. Finally, all 55/55 (100%) of the learners strongly or somewhat agreed that the simulation improved their knowledge, teamwork, communication, and psychomotor skills. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of prehospital providers, clinical management decisions during a newborn resuscitation simulation often deviated from the gold-standard, newborn resuscitation guidelines. Free, online, open-access simulation resources like SimBox can be used to identify and measure practice deviations from standardized resuscitation protocols in the prehospital setting.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Trainees rely on clinical experience to learn clinical reasoning in pediatric emergency medicine (PEM). Outside of clinical experience, graduate medical education provides a handful of explicit activities focused on developing skills in clinical reasoning. OBJECTIVE: In this paper, we describe the development, use, and changing perceptions of a web-based asynchronous tool to facilitate clinical reasoning discussion for PEM providers. METHODS: We created a case-based web-based discussion tool for PEM clinicians and fellows to post and discuss cases. We examined website analytics for site use and collected user survey data over a 3-year period to assess the use and acceptability of the tool. RESULTS: The learning tool had more than 30,000 site visits and 172 case comments for the 55 published cases over 3 years. Self-reported engagement with the learning tool varied inversely with clinical experience in PEM. The tool was relevant to clinical practice and useful for learning PEM for most respondents. The most experienced clinicians were more likely than fellows to report posting commentary, although absolute rate of commentary was low. CONCLUSIONS: An asynchronous method of case presentation and web-based commentary may present an acceptable way to supplement clinical experience and traditional education methods for sharing clinical reasoning.
RESUMO
Introduction: Racism is a public health threat, and racist behaviors adversely affect clinicians in addition to patients. Medical trainees commonly experience racism and bias. More than half of pediatric residents at a single institution reported experiencing or witnessing discriminatory behavior at work; only 50% reported receiving training on implicit bias, delivering difficult feedback, or peer support. Our multispecialty team created Realizing Inclusion and Systemic Equity in Medicine: Upstanding in the Medical Workplace (RISE UP), an antibias, anti-racism communication curriculum composed of three hybrid (virtual and in-person) workshops. Methods: During the pediatric resident workshops, we introduced tools for addressing bias, presented video simulations, and led small-group debriefings with guided role-play. We also reviewed escalation pathways, reporting methods, and support systems. Residents completed an evaluation before and after each workshop to assess the curriculum's efficacy. Results: Thirty-nine residents participated in RISE UP, with 20 attending all three workshops. Ninety-six percent of participants indicated they would recommend the workshops to colleagues. After the third workshop, 92% reported having tools to respond to bias, and 85% reported knowing how to escalate concerns regarding discriminatory behavior. Chief residents were most frequently identified as sources of resident support when encountering discriminatory behavior. Discussion: This curriculum was successful in developing and strengthening residents' responses to discrimination, including upstander support. The curriculum is adaptable for virtual, in-person, and hybrid settings, allowing for flexibility. Establishing institutional support, promoting faculty development, and creating and disseminating escalation pathways are critical to addressing racism in health care.
Assuntos
Medicina , Racismo , Criança , Currículo , Docentes , Humanos , Racismo/prevenção & controle , Local de TrabalhoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Personal protective equipment (PPE) is worn by prehospital providers (PHPs) for protection from hazardous exposures. Evidence regarding the ability of PHPs to perform resuscitation procedures has been described in adult but not pediatric models. This study examined the effects of PPE on the ability of PHPs to perform resuscitation procedures on pediatric patients. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted at a US simulation center. Paramedics wore normal attire at the baseline session and donned full Level B PPE for the second session. During each session, they performed timed sets of psychomotor tasks simulating clinical care of a critically ill pediatric patient. The difference in time to completion between baseline and PPE sessions per task was examined using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. RESULTS: A total of 50 paramedics completed both sessions. Median times for task completion at the PPE sessions increased significantly from baseline for several procedures: tracheal intubation (+4.5 s; P = 0.01), automated external defibrillator (AED) placement (+9.5 s; P = 0.01), intraosseous line insertion (+7 s; P < 0.0001), tourniquet (+8.5 s; P < 0.0001), intramuscular injection (+21-23 s, P < 0.0001), and pulse oximetry (+4 s; P < 0.0001). There was no significant increase in completion time for bag-mask ventilation or autoinjector use. CONCLUSIONS: PPE did not have a significant impact on PHPs performing critical tasks while caring for a pediatric patient with a highly infectious or chemical exposure. This information may guide PHPs faced with the situation of resuscitating children while wearing Level B PPE.
Assuntos
Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Equipamento de Proteção Individual , Adulto , Pessoal Técnico de Saúde , Criança , Humanos , Intubação Intratraqueal/métodos , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
In this technical report, we describe how to use TeleSimBox to run a remotely facilitated simulation to connect the facilitator with learners at a distant site. This method was developed to comply with safety measures imposed during the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic to reduce the risk of viral exposure and transmission. Here, we present one example where a telesimulation naïve facilitator was trained as an in-person facilitator to enable the in-situ medical student and resident learners to participate in a pediatric emergency simulation exercise remotely guided by an off-site content expert. The case of neonatal shock was run five times during a half-day emergency department (ED) educational program with one to four participants per session. 14/15 (93%) participants completed evaluations and felt that the simulation met the case learning objectives and that connecting with the remote facilitator was useful for their learning. Feedback from the one newly trained in-person facilitator was that the tool was easy to learn how to use quickly, and the process of connecting with a remote expert was worthwhile for learners. To grab this web-based toolkit off the proverbial shelf and successfully run a telesimulation session from start to finish took approximately one hour; 20 minutes were spent in preparation the day prior and 40 minutes to set up and run the simulations the day of. We believe that this is a low-cost, efficient, and perceived to be an effective method to connect remotely located content experts and learners to engage in a simulation-based education activity when access to in-person resources and personnel is limited.
RESUMO
With increasing use of open access platforms, simulation-based resources are being shared across geographical borders. There are benefits to designing resources with language and content which is understandable and applicable to learners in different countries. This report aims to assess the differences between scenarios from different groups and explore whether common terms can be used to make internationally relevant simulation resources in future. In collaboration between two groups producing Free Open Access Medical Education simulation resources in the UK and USA, we present observations of terms used in our simulation resources. The content within a series of simulation scenarios from both groups was reviewed, with notable differences in language collected. There are areas of overlap between the terms used in the UK and USA. Semantic, cultural and system differences were found which could prevent scenarios from being transferred between countries. The differences we describe highlight that language choice is important if simulation producers are intent on developing scenarios with international impact. There is work to be done to ensure that resources can be used internationally-embracing linguistics has the potential to aid this process, with the use of simplified language and feedback from local communities being key steps.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: During the COVID-19 pandemic the Association of American Medical Colleges recommended that medical students not be involved with in-person patient care or teaching, necessitating alternative learning opportunities. Subsequently we developed the telesimulation education platform: TeleSimBox. We hypothesized that this remote simulation platform would be feasible and acceptable for faculty use and a perceived effective method for medical student education. METHODS: Twenty-one telesimulations were conducted with students and educators at four U.S. medical schools. Sessions were run by cofacilitator dyads with four to 10 clerkship-level students per session. Facilitators were provided training materials. User-perceived effectiveness and acceptability were evaluated via descriptive analysis of survey responses to the Modified Simulation Effectiveness Tool (SET-M), Net Promoter Score (NPS), and Likert-scale questions. RESULTS: Approximately one-quarter of students and all facilitators completed surveys. Users perceived that the sessions were effective in teaching medical knowledge and teamwork, though less effective for family communication and skills. Users perceived that the telesimulations were comparable to other distance learning and to in-person simulation. The tool was overall positively promoted. CONCLUSION: Users overall positively scored our medical student telesimulation tool on the SET-M objectives and promoted the experience to colleagues on the NPS. The next steps are to further optimize the tool.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) fellowships recruit trainees from both pediatric and emergency medicine (EM) residencies. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) defines separate training pathways for each. The 2015 PEM milestones reflect a combination of subcompetencies from the two residencies. This project aims to compare the milestone achievement of PEM fellows based on their primary residency training. We hypothesize that fellows trained in pediatrics achieve PEM milestones at different rates than EM-trained fellows in the ACGME domains of patient care, medical knowledge, systems-based practice, practice-based learning, professionalism, and interpersonal and communication skills. METHODS: This is a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of fellows from a national sample of U.S. PEM fellowship programs. Basic demographic information and deidentified, biannual milestone scores for 23 competencies were collected for fellows training between 2015 and 2018. Subcompetencies are scored on a 5-point milestone scale. Descriptive and multivariable analyses for longitudinal data were performed to compare milestone assessments by primary residency training. RESULTS: Complete data were obtained for 600 fellows; 95% (570) and 5% (30) completed pediatric and EM residency, respectively. In both year 1 and year 2 of fellowship, the mean milestone scores of EM-trained fellows were statistically higher than pediatrics-trained fellows across the majority of subcompetencies. By the final year of training, there were no statistically significant differences in milestone scores for any of the subcompetencies. CONCLUSIONS: Fellow milestone achievement between groups was not significantly different by graduation. However, fellows entering PEM training from an EM background attained higher scores on the milestones than fellows from a pediatric background in the first year of fellowship.