Transcription of nonrepeated DNA in mouse brain.

Under normal conditions of DNA renaturation, about 60 percent of mouse DNA fragments renature at a rate consistent with their being present only once per sperm. These nonrepeated sequences (also called single-copy or unique) may be used in RNA-DNA hybridization experiments to provide quantitative estimates of RNA diversity. About 10 percent of the mouse single-copy sequences are transcribed in mouse brain tissue. Estimates of about 3 percent were obtained for mouse liver and kidney RNA's. If only one of the complementary DNA strands is transcribed, this hybridization value implies that the equivalent of at least 300,000 different sequences of 1000 nucleotides are expressed in mouse brain tissue. It is suggested that the large amount of DNA in mammals is functionally important, and that a substantial proportion of the genome is expressed in the brain.

Fragile-X syndrome and myotonic dystrophy: parallels and paradoxes.

Fragile-X syndrome and myotonic dystrophy are caused by triplet repeat expansions embedded in CpG islands in the transcribed non-coding regions of the FMR1 and the DMPK genes, respectively. Although initial reports emphasized differences in the mechanisms by which the expanded triplet repeats caused these diseases, results published in the past year highlight remarkable parallels in the likely molecular etiologies. At both loci, expansion is associated with altered chromatin, aberrant methylation, and suppressed expression of the adjacent FMR1 and DMAHP genes, implicating epigenetic mediation of these genetic diseases.

Proposed genetic basis of Huntington's disease.

I propose that Huntington's disease (HD) is caused by dominant position-effect variegation, a phenomenon for which new information is available in Drosophila melanogaster. The essential features of this proposal are that (1) the HD mutation is the result of a chromosome alteration that inactivates transcription of a nearby structural gene or genes (cis-inactivation); the combination of this proposed chromosome alteration and the structural gene(s) is termed the HD allele; (2) there is pairing in some somatic cells between the HD and HD+ alleles on homologous chromosomes; (3) as a result of this somatic pairing, the HD mutation also inactivates transcription of the HD+ structural gene on the normal homologue (trans-inactivation), resulting in complete dominance of the mutation; (4) polymorphism for an X-linked recessive modifier of position-effect variegation means that the age of onset of symptoms of HD will depend on which parent the HD mutation was inherited from. The fully dominant nature of HD and the parental-source effect on the age of onset are thus both understandable within the genetic and epigenetic paradigm of position-effect variegation.

Proposed mechanism of inheritance and expression of the human fragile-X syndrome of mental retardation.

A mechanism is proposed for the inheritance and expression of the fragile-X-linked syndrome of mental retardation in humans. Two independent events are required for expression of the syndrome: the fragile-X mutation, and X chromosome inactivation in pre-oogonial cells. The fragile-X mutation at site Xq27 has little or no effect until the chromosome is inactivated in a female as part of the process of dosage compensation. At a stage where the inactivated X chromosome would normally be reactivated in preparation for oogenesis, the mutation results in a local block to the reactivation process. This block to reactivation leads to mental retardation in progeny by reducing the level of products from the unreactivated Xq27 region in male cells, and, for a heterozygous female, in somatic cells in which the normal X chromosome has been inactivated. Published data relevant to this proposed mechanism are discussed.

Possible erasure of the imprint on a fragile X chromosome when transmitted by a male.

Although most males with the fragile-X [fra(X)] syndrome do not reproduce, there are 2 published pedigrees that include affected males who have daughters and who thus appear to have transmitted the fragile-X chromosome to their progeny. In addition, one published fra(X) pedigree includes an apparently normal male who expresses cytogenetically the fra(X) site at high frequency and who has 3 daughters. In the 6 daughters of these 3 males, there is little or no cytogenetic expression of the fra(X). I interpret these pedigrees within the context of my X-inactivation imprinting model of the fra(X) syndrome (Genetics 117:587-599): the cytogenetic manifestation of the imprinted state of the mutant fra(X) chromosome [high percentage of cytogenetic expression] is no longer present in daughters of imprinted males. I propose that the imprinted state is erased when an imprinted fragile-X chromosome is passed through a male. Such erasure in the gender opposite to the gender that established the imprint is in accord with other examples of chromosome imprinting in mammals. Additional data from unpublished fra(X) pedigrees are requested.

Fragile-X mutation proposed to block complete reactivation in females of an inactive X chromosome.

I discuss two aspects of my proposal that fra(X) chromosomes exist in two states, imprinted and non-imprinted: why do males not imprint the fra(X); does the "Sherman paradox" rule out my proposal?

Intercalary heterochromatin of Drosophila as a potential model for human fragile sites.

We summarize our proposal that "intercalary heterochromatin" of Drosophila is a useful model for human fragile sites. Comparison with Drosophila site 11A suggests that the normal allele of fragile site Xq27 is a meiotic pairing site.

The X-inactivation imprinting model of the fragile-X syndrome: annotated references, 1990.

The X-inactivation imprinting model of the fragile-X syndrome (1), the inference from this model and from pedigree data that human oogonia are derived from two progenitor cells present after the initial event that leads to chromosome imprinting (13), and the general model of fragile sites (8), provide a theoretical framework that is consistent with data on the fragile-X syndrome. This framework has led to novel predictions, some of which have been tested. Results of most tests have been consistent with predictions (10, 13, 17, 18, 27, 28). More direct tests are necessary to explore the underlying mechanisms of chromosome change, here termed imprinting, of the molecular basis of the change, and of the mutation itself.

Structural paradox of polytene chromosomes.

The observation of thick chromatin fibers in interbands of Dipteran polytene chromosomes suggests that there should be 5 to 10 times more mass and DNA in interbands than is commonly thought to be present. To resolve this paradox, the chromatin content of interbands was estimated, using whole-mounted polytene chromosomes from Drosophila melanogster. Densitometry of high voltage electron microscopic negatives provides an estimate of less than 4:1 for the average ratio of cross-sectional dry mass (or mass per unit chromosome length) of bands relative to interbands. This ratio, combined with an estimate of the length of chromosome composed of interbands, indicates that at least 26% of chromosome mass is contributed by interband chromatin. Since DNA comprises a similar proportion of chromatin mass in bands and interbands (Laird et al., 1980b), these data imply that DNA sequences in interbands represent at least 26% of the euchromatic genome of D. melanogaster. This result calls for reinterpretation of some of the genetic and molecular data from Diptera. The discrepancy between this higher estimate of interband mass and DNA, and previous estimates of 3-5%, is discussed. One possibility is that previous measurements were made on prominent interbands, which are proposed here to be in regions that are delayed in DNA replication. Such interbands would be reduced in polyteny and DNA content compared with the average interband region. The concept of local variations in polyteny is also used here to explain major differences in the cross-sectional mass of bands. This leads to a revised model of polytene chromosomes in which at least three levels of polyteny, rather than one or two levels, can be present within one euchromatic region.

Epigene conversion: a proposal with implications for gene mapping in humans.

Epigenetic modification of DNA is now recognized as a potentially important factor in the inheritance and expression of some mutations; its ability to complicate human genetic analysis is concurrently becoming apparent. One unusual form of epigenetic modification, dominant position-effect variegation (PEV), has been used as a model for Huntington disease. In dominant PEV, a fully dominant mutant phenotype results from stable epigenetic inactivation of an allele adjacent to the structural alteration (cis-inactivation) combined with a complementary inactivation of the homologous normal allele (trans-inactivation). We now propose that trans-inactivation of the normal allele may occasionally persist through meiosis. Such "epigene conversion" occurring at the Huntington disease locus in a few percent of meioses would largely account for the published anomalies in that region's genetic map. This concept could also explain anomalous linkage map data for other disease-causing alleles in humans.

Estimating the stability of the proposed imprinted state of the fragile-X mutation when transmitted by females.

Fragile-X syndrome is a major cause of mental retardation in humans. The X-inactivation imprinting model accounts for the unusual pattern of inheritance and expression of this syndrome. According to this model, the fragile-X mutation creates a local block to the attempted reactivation of the mutant X chromosome prior to oogenesis. This local block results in an "imprinted" fragile-X chromosome that is deleterious in males and in females for whom this chromosome is predominantly the active X chromosome. The imprinted state of the fragile-X mutation is inferred to be stable when transmitted by an imprinted female because the penetrance of the syndrome in sons of affected females is estimated to be 1.0. To provide a more precise estimate of the stability of the proposed fragile-X imprint, we have analyzed published pedigrees that include restriction fragment length polymorphism and cytogenetic data from sibships with mothers who are interpreted as having an imprinted fragile-X allele. We conclude that the fragile-X imprint was stable in 46 out of 48 female meioses. This analysis leads to a preliminary estimate of about 96% for the stability of the imprint through female meiosis. Two imprinted females had progeny who appeared to be carriers of a nonimprinted fragile-X allele. If this interpretation is correct, then reversion from the imprinted to the nonimprinted state, or "erasure," can occasionally occur when the mutant fragile-X allele is transmitted by an imprinted female. We discuss the genetic and epigenetic significance of possible female erasure. We request DNA and cytogenetic information from unpublished pedigrees to quantify further the stability, during female meiosis, of the proposed imprinted state of the mutant fragile-X allele.