Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
J. health sci. (Londrina) ; 25(3): 129-136, 202309229.
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1563028

ABSTRACT

The quality of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) images is directly influenced by scanning and visualization protocols. Evaluate the subjective quality of the Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) image of different devices and protocols for diagnosing periodontal structures and correlate the findings with the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). One dry dentate mandible was scanned by six CBCT devices: Accuitomo 3D 170, CS 9000, CS 9300, Eagle 3D, i-CAT Classic, and Orthophos XG 3D. All CBCT devices were adjusted to provide a spatial resolution closest to 0.2 mm, and a FOV height limited to less than 100 mm. Cross-sectional images were evaluated randomly. The buccal bone coverage, the periodontal ligament space and the amount of image noise were assessed. The statistics were calculated based on a logistic regression model with the significance level set at 5%. Protocols with large FOVs demonstrated significantly lower image quality. No statistical differences were found regarding buccal bone coverage between the CBCT devices. The CNR showed the highest value for the Accuitomo 60mm x 60mm HiFi 180°, followed by the Accuitomo 60mm x 60mm HiFi 360°, and lower values for the i-Cat Classic and Orthophos XG 3D devices. Most protocols studied presented good image quality in evaluating the buccal bone coverage and periodontal ligament space. However, the exam with the lowest FOV of the Accuitomo 60mm x 60mm HiFi 180° device showed superiority concerning the others.(AU)


A qualidade das imagens de tomografia computadorizada de feixe cônico (CBCT) é diretamente influenciada pelos protocolos de digitalização e visualização. Avaliar a qualidade subjetiva da imagem da Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cone (CBCT) de diferentes aparelhos e protocolos para o diagnóstico de estruturas periodontais e correlacionar os achados com a razão contraste-ruído (RCR). Uma mandíbula dentada seca foi digitalizada por seis dispositivos CBCT: Accuitomo 3D 170, CS 9000, CS 9300, Eagle 3D, i-CAT Classic e Orthophos XG 3D. Todos os dispositivos CBCT foram ajustados para fornecer uma resolução espacial próxima a 0,2 mm e uma altura de FOV limitada a menos de 100 mm. Imagens transversais foram avaliadas aleatoriamente. A cobertura óssea vestibular, o espaço do ligamento periodontal e a quantidade de ruído da imagem foram avaliados. As estatísticas foram calculadas com base em um modelo de regressão logística com nível de significância de 5%. Protocolos com grandes FOVs demonstraram qualidade de imagem significativamente inferior. Não foram encontradas diferenças estatísticas em relação à cobertura óssea vestibular entre os dispositivos CBCT. O CNR apresentou o maior valor para o Accuitomo 60mm x 60mm HiFi 180°, seguido pelo Accuitomo 60mm x 60mm HiFi 360°, e valores menores para os dispositivos i-Cat Classic e Orthophos XG 3D. A maioria dos protocolos estudados apresentou boa qualidade de imagem na avaliação da cobertura óssea vestibular e do espaço do ligamento periodontal. Entretanto, o exame com menor FOV do aparelho Accuitomo 60mm x 60mm HiFi 180° apresentou superioridade em relação aos demais. (AU)

2.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 30(1): e73, 2016. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-952049

ABSTRACT

Abstract This study aimed at evaluating the validity of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for assessing mandibular bone quality using the Klemetti classification. The morphology of the endosteal mandibular cortex of 30 (60 hemi-mandibles) postmenopausal women between the ages of 45 and 80 years was evaluated based on the Klemetti classification in panoramic radiographs used as reference images. Afterwards, panoramic reconstruction and cross-sectional slices of CBCT examinations of these patients were analyzed and categorized according to the same classification. All the images were assessed by two oral radiologists. The McNemar-Bowker test compared the agreement between the CBCT images and the reference images. No differences were found between the diagnostic results based on panoramic radiography and panoramic reconstruction. However, the mean scores for the cross-sectional evaluation were higher, and the results, statistically different from the others. Based on the disagreement found between the panoramic radiographs and the CBCT cross-sectional slices, the Klemetti classification is not an adequate means of assessing bone quality with CBCT. On the other hand, the higher values found for the cross-sectional slices could be associated with better visibility on the CBCT images.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Radiography, Panoramic/methods , Mandibular Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/diagnostic imaging , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/methods , Mandible/diagnostic imaging , Mandibular Diseases/classification , Bone Density , Observer Variation , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/classification , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Middle Aged
3.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 29(1): 1-6, 2015. tab, ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-777178

ABSTRACT

This article aimed at comparing the accuracy of linear measurement tools of different commercial software packages. Eight fully edentulous dry mandibles were selected for this study. Incisor, canine, premolar, first molar and second molar regions were selected. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were obtained with i-CAT Next Generation. Linear bone measurements were performed by one observer on the cross-sectional images using three different software packages: XoranCat®, OnDemand3D® and KDIS3D®, all able to assess DICOM images. In addition, 25% of the sample was reevaluated for the purpose of reproducibility. The mandibles were sectioned to obtain the gold standard for each region. Intraclass coefficients (ICC) were calculated to examine the agreement between the two periods of evaluation; the one-way analysis of variance performed with the post-hoc Dunnett test was used to compare each of the software-derived measurements with the gold standard. The ICC values were excellent for all software packages. The least difference between the software-derived measurements and the gold standard was obtained with the OnDemand3D and KDIS3D (-0.11 and -0.14 mm, respectively), and the greatest, with the XoranCAT (+0.25 mm). However, there was no statistical significant difference between the measurements obtained with the different software packages and the gold standard (p> 0.05). In conclusion, linear bone measurements were not influenced by the software package used to reconstruct the image from CBCT DICOM data.


Subject(s)
Humans , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/standards , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/standards , Jaw, Edentulous , Mandible , Software/standards , Analysis of Variance , Anatomic Landmarks , Alveolar Process/anatomy & histology , Alveolar Process , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Jaw, Edentulous/pathology , Medical Informatics Applications , Mandible/anatomy & histology , Observer Variation , Reproducibility of Results , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/standards , Time Factors
4.
Braz. j. oral sci ; 13(2): 104-108, Apr-Jun/2014. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-715611

ABSTRACT

AIM: To assess which slice inclination would be more accurate in measuring sites for implant placement: the oblique or the orthoradial slice. METHODS: Five regions of eight edentulous mandibles were selected (incisor, canine, premolar, first molar and second molar). The mandibles were scanned with a Next Generation i-CAT CBCT unit. Two previously calibrated oral radiologists performed vertical measurements in all the selected regions using both the oblique and orthoradial slices. The mandibles were sectioned in all the evaluated regions in order to obtain the gold standard. The Wilcoxon signed rank test compared the measurements obtained in the oblique and orthoradial slices with the gold standard. RESULTS: The bone height measurements for the first and second molar regions using the orthoradial slices were statistically different from the gold standard. CONCLUSIONS: Using the orthoradial slices to obtain cross-sectional images may offer insufficient accuracy for implant placement in the posterior region...


Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Mandible , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL