What are the optimal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets for ß-lactamase inhibitors? A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices are widely used for the selection of optimum antibiotic doses. For ß-lactam antibiotics, fT>MIC, best relates antibiotic exposure to efficacy and is widely used to guide the dosing of ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combinations, often without considering any PK/PD exposure requirements for BLIs. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to describe the PK/PD exposure requirements of BLIs for optimal microbiological efficacy when used in combination with ß-lactam antibiotics. METHODS: Literature was searched online through PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases up to 5 June 2023. Studies that report the PK/PD index and threshold concentration of BLIs approved for clinical use were included. Narrative data synthesis was carried out to assimilate the available evidence. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies were included. The PK/PD index that described the efficacy of BLIs was fT>CT for tazobactam, avibactam and clavulanic acid and fAUC0-24/MIC for relebactam and vaborbactam. The optimal magnitude of the PK/PD index is variable for each BLI based on the companion ß-lactam antibiotics, type of bacteria and ß-lactamase enzyme gene transcription levels. CONCLUSIONS: The PK/PD index that describes the efficacy of BLIs and the exposure measure required for their efficacy is variable among inhibitors; as a result, it is difficult to make clear inference on what the optimum index is. Further PK/PD profiling of BLI, using preclinical infection models that simulate the anticipated mode(s) of clinical use, is warranted to streamline the exposure targets for use in the optimization of dosing regimens.

Effect of Cefepime/Enmetazobactam vs Piperacillin/Tazobactam on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Eradication in Patients With Complicated Urinary Tract Infection or Acute Pyelonephritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Cefepime/enmetazobactam is a novel ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination and a potential empirical therapy for resistant gram-negative infections. Objective: To evaluate whether cefepime/enmetazobactam was noninferior to piperacillin/tazobactam for the primary outcome of treatment efficacy in patients with complicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) or acute pyelonephritis. Design, Setting, and Participants: A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter, noninferiority clinical trial conducted at 90 sites in Europe, North and Central America, South America, and South Africa. Recruitment occurred between September 24, 2018, and November 2, 2019. Final follow-up occurred November 26, 2019. Participants were adult patients aged 18 years or older with a clinical diagnosis of complicated UTI or acute pyelonephritis caused by gram-negative urinary pathogens. Interventions: Eligible patients were randomized to receive either cefepime, 2 g/enmetazobactam, 0.5 g (n = 520), or piperacillin, 4 g/tazobactam, 0.5 g (n = 521), by 2-hour infusion every 8 hours for 7 days (up to 14 days in patients with a positive blood culture at baseline). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients in the primary analysis set (patients who received any amount of study drug with a baseline gram-negative pathogen not resistant to either treatment and ≥105 colony-forming units [CFU]/mL in urine culture or the same pathogen present in concurrent blood and urine cultures) who achieved overall treatment success (defined as clinical cure combined with microbiological eradication [<103 CFU/mL in urine] of infection). Two-sided 95% CIs were computed using the stratified Newcombe method. The prespecified noninferiority margin was -10%. If noninferiority was established, a superiority comparison was also prespecified. Results: Among 1041 patients randomized (mean age, 54.7 years; 573 women [55.0%]), 1034 (99.3%) received study drug and 995 (95.6%) completed the trial. Among the primary analysis set, the primary outcome occurred in 79.1% (273/345) of patients receiving cefepime/enmetazobactam compared with 58.9% (196/333) receiving piperacillin/tazobactam (between-group difference, 21.2% [95% CI, 14.3% to 27.9%]). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 50.0% (258/516) of patients treated with cefepime/enmetazobactam and 44.0% (228/518) with piperacillin/tazobactam; most were mild to moderate in severity (89.9% vs 88.6%, respectively). A total of 1.7% (9/516) of participants who received cefepime/enmetazobactam and 0.8% (4/518) of those who received piperacillin/tazobactam did not complete the assigned therapy due to adverse events. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with complicated UTI or acute pyelonephritis caused by gram-negative pathogens, cefepime/enmetazobactam, compared with piperacillin/tazobactam, met criteria for noninferiority as well as superiority with respect to the primary outcome of clinical cure and microbiological eradication. Further research is needed to determine the potential role for cefepime/enmetazobactam in the treatment of complicated UTI and pyelonephritis. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03687255.

Optimal Piperacillin-Tazobactam Dosing Strategies against Extended-Spectrum-ß-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Piperacillin-tazobactam has been proposed as an alternative to carbapenems for the treatment of infections caused by extended-spectrum-ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae However, limited understanding of optimal dosing strategies for this combination may curtail its utility. In this study, we correlated various exposures of piperacillin-tazobactam to efficacy, using a modified pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic index. Using a clinical Klebsiella pneumoniae isolate expressing CTX-M-15, piperacillin MIC values were determined with increasing tazobactam concentrations and fitted to a sigmoid inhibitory maximum effect (Emax) model. A hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM) was used to evaluate the efficacy of escalating tazobactam dosing with a fixed piperacillin exposure. Simulated drug concentrations from the HFIM were incorporated in the Emax model to determine the percentage of free time above instantaneous MIC (%fT>MICi) associated with each experimental exposure. The target %fT>MICi associated with growth suppression was prospectively validated using an SHV-12-producing isolate of Escherichia coli and 2 other CTX-M-15-producing K. pneumoniae isolates. Based on our reference isolate, piperacillin-tazobactam exposures of %fT>MICi of ≥55.1% were associated with growth suppression. Despite underlying differences, these findings were consistent with prospective observations in 3 other clinical isolates. Our modeling approach can be applied relatively easily in the clinical setting, and it appeared to be robust in predicting the effectiveness of various piperacillin-tazobactam exposures. This modified pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic index could be used to characterize response to other ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations.

Individualizing piperacillin/tazobactam dosing in adult patients with cystic fibrosis: can tobramycin measurements help?

Background: Empirical models to predict ß-lactam pharmacokinetics (PK) using information from routine aminoglycoside therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) have been proposed for critically ill patients; however, no such models exist for patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Objectives: To investigate whether PK parameters of tobramycin could be used to predict those of piperacillin. Methods: A non-interventional, open-label PK study was conducted in hospitalized adults treated with piperacillin/tazobactam and tobramycin for acute pulmonary exacerbations of CF. Six serum samples per patient were collected and analysed. One- and two-compartment population PK models with linear, Michaelis-Menten or mixed elimination were evaluated for both drugs within the PmetricsTM package for R. Models were developed and compared iteratively using the log-likelihood and Akaike information criterion (AIC) objective functions. Results: Nine primarily female (n = 8) and Caucasian (100%) adult CF patients were enrolled. The median (IQR) age, height, weight and serum creatinine of included patients was 31 (27-32) years, 51.4 (49.9-55.8) kg, 162.6 (160.0-165.1) cm and 0.6 (0.5-0.6) mg/dL, respectively. The final model with the lowest objective function values consisted of one compartment with first-order elimination for tobramycin and two compartments with mixed-order elimination for piperacillin with the elimination rate constant of piperacillin modelled as a linear function of the elimination rate constant of tobramycin. Conclusions: A relationship was identified between the elimination rate constants of tobramycin and piperacillin. Validation of this relationship in larger studies of adult patients with CF is needed before application to the precision dosing of piperacillin/tazobactam in this patient population.

Pharmacokinetics of ticarcillin-clavulanate in premature infants.

Ticarcillin-clavulanate covers a broad spectrum of pathogens that are common in premature infants. In infants <30 weeks gestational age, pharmacokinetic data to guide ticarcillin-clavulanate dosing are lacking. We enrolled 15 premature infants <30 weeks gestational age, determined pharmacokinetic parameters, and performed dosing simulations to determine optimal dosing for ticarcillin-clavulanate. The infants had a median (range) postnatal age (PNA) of 18 days (6-44 days) and gestational age of 25 weeks (23-28 weeks). Clearance was lower in infants with a PNA <14 days (0.050 L/kg/h [range 0.043-0.075]) compared with a PNA ≥14-45 days (0.078 L/kg/h [0.047-0.100]), consistent with maturation of renal function. Dosing simulations determined that ticarcillin 75 mg/kg q12h (PNA <14 days) or q8h (PNA ≥ 14-45 days) achieved the target exposure for organisms with a minimum inhibitory concentration ≤16 µ/mL in >90% of simulated infants. For highly resistant organisms (minimum inhibitory concentration 32 µg/mL), increased dosing frequency or extended infusion are necessary.

Scaling beta-lactam antimicrobial pharmacokinetics from early life to old age.

AIMS: Beta-lactam dose optimization in critical care is a current priority. We aimed to review the pharmacokinetics (PK) of three commonly used beta-lactams (amoxicillin ± clavulanate, piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem) to compare PK parameters reported in critically and noncritically ill neonates, children and adults, and to investigate whether allometric and maturation scaling principles could be applied to describe changes in PK parameters through life. METHODS: A systematic review of PK studies of the three drugs was undertaken using MEDLINE and EMBASE. PK parameters and summary statistics were extracted and scaled using allometric principles to 70 kg individual for comparison. Pooled data were used to model clearance maturation and decline using a sigmoidal (Hill) function. RESULTS: A total of 130 papers were identified. Age ranged from 29 weeks to 82 years and weight from 0.9-200 kg. PK parameters from critically ill populations were reported with wider confidence intervals than those in healthy volunteers, indicating greater PK variability in critical illness. The standard allometric size and sigmoidal maturation model adequately described increasing clearance in neonates, and a sigmoidal model was also used to describe decline in older age. Adult weight-adjusted clearance was achieved at approximately 2 years postmenstrual age. Changes in volume of distribution were well described by the standard allometric model, although amoxicillin data suggested a relatively higher volume of distribution in neonates. CONCLUSIONS: Critical illness is associated with greater PK variability than in healthy volunteers. The maturation models presented will be useful for optimizing beta-lactam dosing, although a prospective, age-inclusive study is warranted for external validation.

False-positive Candida and Aspergillus antigen testing in recipients of allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation due to administration of parenteral nutrition and fixed combinations of piperacillin-tazobactam.

False positivity of antigen immunoassays used as an early diagnostic tool to detect invasive fungal infections is known. Interpretation of the assay needs the identification of sources which could affect the specificity of the test. We focused on the influence of parenteral nutrition (PN) and piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) on fungal immunoassays. Measurable amounts of Candida antigen mannan were detected in several compounds of PN and TZP in a previous in vitro study. In the current study, 84 patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation receiving either TZP, PN or both were monitored with Aspergillus and Candida antigen assay. Six patients were analysed closer in a kinetic analysis with more frequent blood sampling to detect mannan. PN in diverse compositions as well as TZP did not increase significantly the amount of mannan and the Aspergillus antigen in serum. We could not confirm the positive results of the in vitro study. Physicians should be aware that mannan antigenemia due to drug infusion could be a transient issue and should be considered in the interpretation of fungal immunoassays, although we could not find clinically relevant effects on mannan levels.

Atopobium vaginae intrapartum bacteremia: A case report with a literature review.

Atopobium vaginae is an anaerobic Gram-positive bacterium recognized as a causative agent of bacterial vaginosis and associated with preterm delivery. Invasive infection and bacteremia have been rarely reported. We describe the case of a woman expecting her firstborn child who presented with a A. vaginae bacteremia during labor. Identification was performed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Both maternal and fetal outcomes were favorable due to the maternal treatment with amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. We identified three other cases in the literature with different fetal outcome. The genetic diversity of A. vaginae should be further explored in order to reveal potential strains with differential pathogenic potential.

Highly variable absorption of clavulanic acid during the day: a population pharmacokinetic analysis.

Objectives: To calculate the clavulanic acid exposure of oral amoxicillin/clavulanic acid dosing regimens, to investigate variability using a population pharmacokinetic model and to explore target attainment using Monte Carlo simulations. Methods: Two groups of healthy male volunteers received amoxicillin/clavulanic acid tablets at the start of a standard meal on two separate days 1 week apart. One group (n = 14) received 875/125 mg q12h and 500/125 mg q8h and the other group (n = 15) received 500/125 mg q12h and 250/125 mg q8h. In total, 1479 blood samples were collected until 8-12 h after administration. Concentrations were analysed using non-compartmental (WinNonLin) and population pharmacokinetic (NONMEM) methods. Results: Median Cmax and AUC0-8 were 2.21 mg/L (0.21-4.35) and 4.99 mg·h/L (0.44-8.31), respectively. In 40/58 daily concentration-time profiles, Cmax and AUC0-8 of the morning dose were higher than with later doses. The final population model included a lag time (0.447 h), first-order absorption (3.99 h-1 at 8:00 h, between-subject variability 52.8%, between-occasion variability 48.5%), one distribution compartment (33.0 L, between-subject variability 23.9%) and first-order elimination (24.6 L/h, between-subject variability 26.7%). Bioavailability (fixed at 1 at 8:00 h, between-occasion variability 28.2%) and absorption rate decreased over the day. For 97.5% of the simulated population after 125 mg q12h or q8h, %fT > Ct at 0.5 mg/L was 8.33% (q12h) and 15.2% (q8h), %fT > Ct at 1 mg/L was 0% (q12h + q8h), and fAUC0-24 was 3.61 (q12h) and 5.56 (q8h) mg·h/L. Conclusions: Clavulanic acid absorption in healthy volunteers is highly variable. Bioavailability and absorption rate decrease over the day. The model developed here may serve to suggest clavulanic acid dosing regimens to optimize efficacy and prevent underdosing.

Ceftazidime/avibactam versus standard-of-care agents against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae harbouring blaKPC in a one-compartment pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model.

Background: 'Last-line' antimicrobial usage has promoted the emergence of MDR bacteria. Production of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPCs) is increasingly common and leads to resistance to most antimicrobials. However, ceftazidime/avibactam demonstrates activity against KPC-producing strains. Ceftazidime/avibactam in the empirical setting remains unknown. Methods: Strains underwent genetic analysis evaluating blaKPC presence/production and MICs were determined. Four strains were assessed in an in vitro, one-compartment pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) model for 96 h. The following bolus dosing exposures were tested: 2.5 g of ceftazidime/avibactam every 8 h, 2 g of meropenem every 8 h, 1.25 mg/kg polymyxin B every 12 h, amikacin 'once-daily dosing' (peak of 70-80 mg/L), tigecycline at 200 mg ×1 dose followed by 100 mg every 12 h, and a drug-free growth control. Results: Thirty blaKPC-producing strains were evaluated; 97% of strains were ceftazidime/avibactam susceptible with MIC50/MIC90 values of 0.38/1.5 mg/L (range 0.032-16 mg/L). Two K. pneumoniae strains, one Klebsiella oxytoca strain and one Citrobacter freundii strain underwent further analysis in PK/PD models. Ceftazidime/avibactam displayed potent activity with a reduction of 4.23 ±âŸ0.42 cfu/mL from the initial inoculum at 96 h. Against susceptible isolates, amikacin displayed similar activity compared with ceftazidime/avibactam at 96 h, although this was not demonstrated against all strains. Polymyxin B produced comparable activity to ceftazidime/avibactam against two strains. Neither meropenem nor tigecycline produced effective killing and were comparable to the drug-free growth control at 96 h. Conclusions: blaKPC-producing organisms demonstrated susceptibility to ceftazidime/avibactam and bactericidal activity was observed in the PK/PD model. Based on these data, ceftazidime/avibactam is a valuable agent for treating KPC-producing organisms and should be considered for treatment of infections caused by these pathogens.

Antibacterial effect of ceftolozane/tazobactam in combination with amikacin against aerobic Gram-negative bacilli studied in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model of infection.

Objectives: To use a pre-clinical infection model to assess the antibacterial effect of human simulations of dosing with ceftolozane/tazobactam (with or without amikacin) or meropenem against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Methods: An in vitro pharmacokinetic model was used to assess changes in bacterial load and profiles after exposure to mean human serum concentrations over 168 h. Changes in area under the bacterial kill curve (AUBKC; log cfu/mL·h) and growth on 4 × MIC recovery plates were the co-primary outcome measures. Results: Simulations of ceftolozane/tazobactam at 1 g/0.5 g or 2 g/1 g q8h or meropenem 2 g q8h all produced a >4 log reduction in bacterial load of Escherichia coli. Meropenem had smaller AUBKC values, indicating greater reduction in bacterial load than ceftolozane/tazobactam. Meropenem was also more effective than ceftolozane/tazobactam against Klebsiella pneumoniae strains. All regimens were equally effective in reducing P. aeruginosa bacterial load measured by AUBKC but growth on 4 × MIC recovery plates and changes in population profiles were only seen with meropenem. Addition of amikacin at 15 mg/kg q24h or 7.5 mg/kg q12h to 2 g/1 g of ceftolozane/tazobactam produced greater reductions in bacterial load but generated changes in amikacin population profiles with the 7.5 mg/kg q12h amikacin simulation. Conclusions: The doses of ceftolozane/tazobactam simulated were highly effective in reducing the bacterial load of E. coli (MIC ≤0.25 mg/L), but less so for K. pneumoniae (MIC 4 mg/L). For both species, meropenem produced an overall greater reduction in pathogen load. Ceftolozane/tazobactam and meropenem were equally effective as monotherapy against P. aeruginosa but emergence of resistance occurred with meropenem. Addition of amikacin to ceftolozane/tazobactam reduced the bacterial load of P. aeruginosa at the expense of emergence of resistance to amikacin.

Prospective, randomized, double-blind, Phase 2 dose-ranging study comparing efficacy and safety of imipenem/cilastatin plus relebactam with imipenem/cilastatin alone in patients with complicated urinary tract infections.

Objectives: The ß-lactamase inhibitor relebactam can restore imipenem activity against imipenem non-susceptible pathogens. Methods: To explore relebactam's safety, tolerability and efficacy, we conducted a randomized (1:1:1), controlled, Phase 2 trial comparing imipenem/cilastatin+relebactam 250 mg, imipenem/cilastatin+relebactam 125 mg and imipenem/cilastatin alone in adults with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) or acute pyelonephritis, regardless of baseline pathogen susceptibility. Treatment was administered intravenously every 6 h for 4-14 days, with optional step-down to oral ciprofloxacin. The primary endpoint was favourable microbiological response rate (pathogen eradication) at discontinuation of intravenous therapy (DCIV) in the microbiologically evaluable (ME) population. Non-inferiority of imipenem/cilastatin+relebactam over imipenem/cilastatin alone was defined as lower bounds of the 95% CI for treatment differences being above -15%. Results: At DCIV, 71 patients in the imipenem/cilastatin + 250 mg relebactam, 79 in the imipenem/cilastatin + 125 mg relebactam and 80 in the imipenem/cilastatin-only group were ME; 51.7% had cUTI and 48.3% acute pyelonephritis. Microbiological response rates were 95.5%, 98.6% and 98.7%, respectively, confirming non-inferiority of both imipenem/cilastatin + relebactam doses to imipenem/cilastatin alone. Clinical response rates were 97.1%, 98.7% and 98.8%, respectively. All 23 ME patients with imipenem non-susceptible pathogens had favourable DCIV microbiological responses (100% in each group). Among all 298 patients treated, 28.3%, 29.3% and 30.0% of patients, respectively, had treatment-emergent adverse events. The most common treatment-related adverse events across groups (1.0%-4.0%) were diarrhoea, nausea and headache. Conclusions: Imipenem/cilastatin + relebactam (250 or 125 mg) was as effective as imipenem/cilastatin alone for treatment of cUTI. Both relebactam-containing regimens were well tolerated. (NCT01505634).

The pharmacodynamics of avibactam in combination with ceftaroline or ceftazidime against ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae studied in an in vitro model of infection.

Objectives: Pharmacodynamics of ß-lactamase inhibitors are an area of intense interest as new ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations enter clinical development and clinical practice. Avibactam, a non-ß-lactam ß-lactamase inhibitor, has been combined with ceftaroline or ceftazidime but these two combinations have not been directly compared. Methods: Using an in vitro pharmacokinetic model we simulated human drug concentration-time courses associated with ceftaroline 600 mg every 8 h and ceftazidime 2000 mg every 8 h. Avibactam was given by continuous infusion at a range of concentrations up to 10 mg/L and antibacterial effect assessed against a CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli , AmpC-hyperproducing Enterobacter cloacae and KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Simulations were performed over 72 h. Results: Avibactam, at a concentration of 1-2 mg/L, produced maximum bacterial clearance over 72 h for the E. coli and E. cloacae strains with both ceftaroline and ceftazidime. Avibactam (4 mg/L) was required for maximum reduction in bacterial load with the KPC-producing K. pneumoniae. A series of dose fractionation experiments were performed with avibactam against each of the three strains and AUC, C max or T > avibactam concentration of 1, 2 or 4 mg/L related to antibacterial effect as measured by change in bacterial count at 24 h. AUC or C max were best related to 24 h antibacterial effect for avibactam though there was no consistent pattern favouring one over the other. Conclusions: As AUC is a much easier and more reliable pharmacokinetic measure than C max , it would be useful to explore how AUC-based indices for avibactam exposures could be used for translating the results of the present study into patients' therapy.

Efficacy of ceftolozane/tazobactam against urinary tract and intra-abdominal infections caused by ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: a pooled analysis of Phase 3 clinical trials.

OBJECTIVES: The increase in infections caused by drug-resistant ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-ENT) is a global concern. The characteristics and outcomes of patients infected with ESBL-ENT were examined in a pooled analysis of Phase 3 clinical trials of ceftolozane/tazobactam in patients with complicated urinary tract infections (ASPECT-cUTI) and complicated intra-abdominal infections (ASPECT-cIAI). METHODS: Trials were randomized and double blind. The ASPECT-cUTI regimen was 7 days of either intravenous ceftolozane/tazobactam (1.5 g) every 8 h or levofloxacin (750 mg) once daily. The ASPECT-cIAI regimen was 4-14 days of either intravenous ceftolozane/tazobactam (1.5 g) plus metronidazole (500 mg) or meropenem (1 g) every 8 h. Baseline cultures were obtained in both indications. Enterobacteriaceae were selected for ESBL characterization based on predefined criteria and were verified genotypically. Outcomes were assessed at the test-of-cure visit 5-9 days post-therapy in ASPECT-cUTI and 24-32 days post-randomization in ASPECT-cIAI among microbiologically evaluable (ME) patients. RESULTS: Of 2076 patients randomized, 1346 were included in the pooled ME population and 150 of 1346 (11.1%) had ESBL-ENT at baseline. At US FDA/EUCAST breakpoints of ≤2/≤1 mg/L, 81.8%/72.3% of ESBL-ENT (ESBL-Escherichia coli, 95%/88.1%; ESBL-Klebsiella pneumoniae, 56.7%/36.7%) were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam versus 25.3%/24.1% susceptible to levofloxacin and 98.3%/98.3% susceptible to meropenem at CLSI/EUCAST breakpoints. Clinical cure rates for ME patients with ESBL-ENT were 97.4% (76/78) for ceftolozane/tazobactam [ESBL-E. coli, 98.0% (49 of 50); ESBL-K. pneumoniae, 94.4% (17 of 18)], 82.6% (38 of 46) for levofloxacin and 88.5% (23 of 26) for meropenem. CONCLUSIONS: Randomized trial data demonstrated high clinical cure rates with ceftolozane/tazobactam treatment of cIAI and cUTI caused by ESBL-ENT.

Randomized clinical trial of 24 versus 72 h antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients undergoing open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Open total gastrectomy carries a high risk of surgical-site infection (SSI). This study evaluated the non-inferiority of antimicrobial prophylaxis for 24 compared with 72 h after open total gastrectomy. METHODS: An open-label, randomized, non-inferiority study was conducted at 57 institutions in Japan. Eligible patients were those who underwent open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Patients were assigned randomly to continued use of ß-lactamase inhibitor for either 24 or 72 h after surgery. The primary endpoint was the incidence of SSI, with non-inferiority based on a margin of 9 percentage points and a 90 per cent c.i. The secondary endpoint was the incidence of remote infection. RESULTS: A total of 464 patients (24 h prophylaxis, 228; 72 h prophylaxis, 236) were analysed. SSI occurred in 20 patients (8·8 per cent) in the 24-h prophylaxis group and 26 (11·0 per cent) in the 72-h group (absolute difference -2·2 (90 per cent c.i. -6·8 to 2·4) per cent; P < 0·001 for non-inferiority). However, the incidence of remote infection was significantly higher in the 24-h prophylaxis group. CONCLUSION: Antimicrobial prophylaxis for 24 h after total gastrectomy is not inferior to 72 h prophylaxis for prevention of SSI. Shortened antimicrobial prophylaxis might increase the incidence of remote infection. Registration number: UMIN000001062 ( http://www.umin.ac.jp).

Clinical outcomes of extended versus intermittent administration of piperacillin/tazobactam for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia: a randomized controlled trial.

The purpose of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics, clinical efficiency, and pharmacoeconomic parameters of piperacillin/tazobactam administered by extended infusion (EI) or intermittent infusion (II) in the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) in critically ill patients with low illness severity in China. Fifty patients completed the study, with 25 patients receiving 4/0.5 g piperacillin/tazobactam over 30 min as the II group and 25 patients receiving 4/0.5 g piperacillin/tazobactam over 3 h every 6 h as the EI group. Drug assay was performed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The percentage of the dosing interval for which the free piperacillin concentration (%fT) exceeds the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was calculated. The patients' therapy cost, clinical efficiency, and adverse effects were also recorded. %fT>MIC was about 100, 98.73, and 93.04 % in the EI arm versus 81.48, 53.29, and 42.15 % in the II arm, respectively, when the microorganism responsible for HAP had an MIC of 4, 8, and 16 mg/L. The therapy cost in the EI group was lower than that of the II group ($1351.72 ± 120.39 vs. $1782.04 ± 164.51, p = 0.001). However, the clinical success rate, clinical failure rate, and drug-related adverse events did not significantly differ between groups. EI treatment with piperacillin/tazobactam was a cost-effective approach to the management of HAP, being equally clinically effective to conventional II.

Impact of oral antibiotics on health-related quality of life after mandibular third molar surgery: An observational study.

AIM: To compare the impact of antibiotics on health-related quality of life (QoL) outcomes following third molar surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 135 subjects that required surgical extraction of mandibular third molar under local anesthesia and met the inclusion criteria. The subjects were randomized into three study groups of 45 subjects each: Group A - extended amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (GlaxoSmithKline Beecham England), 1 gram pre-operatively and then 625 mg BD for 5 days Group B - prophylactic amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (GlaxoSmithKline Beecham England) 1 gram pre-operatively only, and Group C - prophylactic levofloxacin 1 gram pre-operatively only. Patients were assessed pre- and post-operatively on days 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 using the United Kingdom oral health-related QoL (OHRQoL) questionnaire. RESULTS: This study showed that surgical removal of impacted teeth exerted a negative influence on patient's QoL across various physical, social, and psychological aspects of life. Comparing the three groups, Group A showed a slightly better QoL score; although, there was no statistically significant difference among them. Studies have shown better clinical recovery following administration of antibiotics after third molar surgery. CONCLUSION: There was a significant deterioration in OHRQoL in the immediate postoperative period, particularly postoperative days 1 and 3 following third molar surgery. QoL was also observed to be slightly better in Group A than Groups B and C, although this was not statistically significant.

Ceftazidime/Avibactam and Ceftolozane/Tazobactam: Second-generation ß-Lactam/ß-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations.

Ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam are 2 novel ß-lactam/ß-lactamase combination antibiotics. The antimicrobial spectrum of activity of these antibiotics includes multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative bacteria (GNB), including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Ceftazidime/avibactam is also active against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae that produce Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases. However, avibactam does not inactivate metallo-ß-lactamases such as New Delhi metallo-ß-lactamases. Both ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam are only available as intravenous formulations and are dosed 3 times daily in patients with normal renal function. Clinical trials showed noninferiority to comparators of both agents when used in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections and complicated intra-abdominal infections (when used with metronidazole). Results from pneumonia studies have not yet been reported. In summary, ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam are 2 new second-generation cephalosporin/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations. After appropriate trials are conducted, they may prove useful in the treatment of MDR GNB infections. Antimicrobial stewardship will be essential to preserve the activity of these agents.

Phase I Study Assessing the Pharmacokinetic Profile, Safety, and Tolerability of a Single Dose of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients.

This study aimed to investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of a single dose of ceftazidime-avibactam in pediatric patients. A phase I, multicenter, open-label PK study was conducted in pediatric patients hospitalized with an infection and receiving systemic antibiotic therapy. Patients were enrolled into four age cohorts (cohort 1, ≥12 to <18 years; cohort 2, ≥6 to <12 years; cohort 3, ≥2 to <6 years; cohort 4, ≥3 months to <2 years). Patients received a single 2-h intravenous infusion of ceftazidime-avibactam (cohort 1, 2,000 to 500 mg; cohort 2, 2,000 to 500 mg [≥40 kg] or 50 to 12.5 mg/kg [<40 kg]; cohorts 3 and 4, 50 to 12.5 mg/kg). Blood samples were collected to describe individual PK characteristics for ceftazidime and avibactam. Population PK modeling was used to describe characteristics of ceftazidime and avibactam PK across all age groups. Safety and tolerability were assessed. Thirty-two patients received study drug. Mean plasma concentration-time curves, geometric mean maximum concentration (Cmax), and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) were similar across all cohorts for both drugs. Six patients (18.8%) reported an adverse event, all mild or moderate in intensity. No deaths or serious adverse events occurred. The single-dose PK of ceftazidime and avibactam were comparable between each of the 4 age cohorts investigated and were broadly similar to those previously observed in adults. No new safety concerns were identified. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01893346.).

Intravenous amoxicillin/clavulanate for the prevention of bacteraemia following dental procedures: a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: Although controversy exists regarding the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis for patients at risk of infective endocarditis, expert committees continue to publish recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis regimens. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of four antimicrobial regimens for the prevention of bacteraemia following dental extractions. METHODS: The study population included 266 adults requiring dental extractions who were randomly assigned to the following five groups: control (no prophylaxis); 1000/200 mg of amoxicillin/clavulanate intravenously; 2 g of amoxicillin by mouth; 600 mg of clindamycin by mouth; and 600 mg of azithromycin by mouth. Venous blood samples were collected from each patient at baseline and at 30 s, 15 min and 1 h after dental extractions. Samples were inoculated into BACTEC Plus culture bottles and processed in the BACTEC 9240. Conventional microbiological techniques were used for subcultures and further identification of the isolated bacteria. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with ID number NCT02115776. RESULTS: The incidence of bacteraemia in the control, amoxicillin/clavulanate, amoxicillin, clindamycin and azithromycin groups was: 96%, 0%, 50%, 87% and 81%, respectively, at 30 s; 65%, 0%, 10%, 65% and 49% at 15 min; and 18%, 0%, 4%, 19% and 18% at 1 h. Streptococci were the most frequently identified bacteria. The percentage of positive blood cultures at 30 s post-extraction was lower in the amoxicillin/clavulanate group than in the amoxicillin group (P < 0.001). The incidence of bacteraemia in the clindamycin group was similar to that in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Bacteraemia following dental extractions was undetectable with amoxicillin/clavulanate prophylaxis. Alternative antimicrobial regimens should be sought for patients allergic to the ß-lactams.