RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: The traditional endoscopic therapy of anastomotic strictures (AS) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is multiple ERCPs with the insertion of an increasing number of plastic stents side-by-side. Fully covered self-expanding metal stents (cSEMS) could be a valuable option to decrease the number of procedures needed or non-responders to plastic stents. This study aims to retrospectively analyse the results of AS endoscopic treatment by cSEMS and to identify any factors associated with its success. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-one patients (mean age 55.9 ± 7.6 SD; 73 males) from nine Italian transplantation centres, had a cSEMS positioned for post-OLT-AS between 2007 and 2017. Forty-nine (54%) patients were treated with cSEMS as a second-line treatment. RESULTS: All the procedures were successfully performed without immediate complications. After ERCP, adverse events occurred in 11% of cases (2 moderate pancreatitis and 8 cholangitis). In 49 patients (54%), cSEMSs migrated. After cSEMS removal, 46 patients (51%) needed further endoscopic (45 patients) or radiological (1 patient) treatments to solve the AS. Lastly, seven patients underwent surgery. Multivariable stepwise logistic regression showed that cSEMS migration was the only factor associated with further treatments (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.0-6.6; p value 0.03); cSEMS implantation before 12 months from OLT was associated with stent migration (OR 5.2, 95% CI 1.7-16.0; p value 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: cSEMS appears to be a safe tool to treat AS. cSEMS migration is the main limitation to its routinary implantation and needs to be prevented, probably with the use of new generation anti-migration stents.
Asunto(s)
Colestasis , Trasplante de Hígado , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/efectos adversos , Colestasis/etiología , Colestasis/cirugía , Constricción Patológica/cirugía , Humanos , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Plásticos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Silicatos , Stents/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Myocarditis is a rare extra-intestinal complication of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), in particular, ulcerative colitis.We report a case of acute myocarditis as first manifestation of severe ulcerative colitis. A 22-year-old man was admitted with fever, bloody diarrhea, and fatigue. He had suffered from frequent bloody diarrhea, abdominal pain, fatigue, and weight loss for one month. A 12-lead-electrocardiogram showed sinus rhythm with QRS fragmentation and T waves inversion. High sensitivity troponin-I was elevated and the echocardiogram showed a mild pericardial effusion and inferior hypokinesia with normal ejection fraction. Cardiac magnetic resonance disclosed late enhancement in the inferior wall, corroborating the hypothesis of myocarditis. One week later, a colonoscopy revealed severe ulcerative extensive colitis (Mayo subscore 3). 5-aminosalicylic acid (mesalazine) and systemic steroid were started with good clinical and biochemical response. The following days the patient developed mesalazine hepatic and pancreatic induced toxicity requiring drug discontinuation and strict multi-disciplinary follow-up. At 7â¯months follow-up intestinal symptoms were well controlled with complete normalization of liver and pancreatic enzymes. Transthoracic echocardiography showed normal biventricular function and pericardial effusion resolution.This case underscores the importance of a high suspicion for extra intestinal involvement in patients with IBD. These complications may be multifactorial and need multidisciplinary management. Learning objective: â¢When a patient was first-time diagnosed with a severe form of inflammatory bowel disease or has a disease relapse, bear in mind myocarditis as possible extra intestinal manifestation.â¢Multidisciplinary management is crucial to ensure the best level of care and follow-up in a such challenging and insidious clinical picture.
RESUMEN
Measurements of serum concentrations of therapeutic antibodies and anti-drug antibodies (ADA) can support clinical decisions for the management of non-responders, optimizing the therapy. In the present study we compared the results obtained by classical ELISA and a recently proposed surface plasmon resonance (SPR)-based immunoassay, in 76 patients receiving infliximab for inflammatory bowel diseases. The two methods indicated very similar serum concentrations of the drug, but there were striking differences as regards ADA. All the sera showing ADA by ELISA (14) also showed ADA by SPR, but the absolute amounts were different, being 7-490 times higher with SPR, with no correlation. Eight patients showed ADA only with SPR, and these ADA had significantly faster dissociation rate constants than those detectable by both SPR and ELISA. The underestimation, or the lack of detection, of ADA by ELISA is likely to reflect the long incubation steps which favor dissociation of the patient's low-affinity ADA, while the commercial, high-affinity anti-infliximab antibodies used for the calibration curve do not dissociate. This problem is less important with SPR, which monitors binding in real time. The possibility offered by SPR to detect ADA in patients otherwise considered ADA-negative by ELISA could have important implications for clinicians.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos/sangre , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Infliximab/administración & dosificación , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Humanos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/sangre , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/inmunología , Infliximab/inmunología , Límite de Detección , Quimioterapia de Mantención , Resonancia por Plasmón de Superficie , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although evidence suggests frequent gastrointestinal (GI) involvement during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), endoscopic findings are scarcely reported. AIMS: We aimed at registering endoscopic abnormalities and potentially associated risk factors among patients with COVID-19. METHODS: All consecutive patients with COVID-19 undergoing endoscopy in 16 institutions from high-prevalence regions were enrolled. Mann-Whitney U, χ2 or Fisher's exact test were used to compare patients with major abnormalities to those with negative procedures, and multivariate logistic regression to identify independent predictors. RESULTS: Between February and May 2020, during the first pandemic outbreak with severely restricted endoscopy activity, 114 endoscopies on 106 patients with COVID-19 were performed in 16 institutions (men=70.8%, median age=68 (58-74); 33% admitted in intensive care unit; 44.4% reporting GI symptoms). 66.7% endoscopies were urgent, mainly for overt GI bleeding. 52 (45.6%) patients had major abnormalities, whereas 13 bled from previous conditions. The most prevalent upper GI abnormalities were ulcers (25.3%), erosive/ulcerative gastro-duodenopathy (16.1%) and petechial/haemorrhagic gastropathy (9.2%). Among lower GI endoscopies, 33.3% showed an ischaemic-like colitis.Receiver operating curve analysis identified D-dimers >1850 ng/mL as predicting major abnormalities. Only D-dimers >1850 ng/mL (OR=12.12 (1.69-86.87)) and presence of GI symptoms (OR=6.17 (1.13-33.67)) were independently associated with major abnormalities at multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: In this highly selected cohort of hospitalised patients with COVID-19 requiring endoscopy, almost half showed acute mucosal injuries and more than one-third of lower GI endoscopies had features of ischaemic colitis. Among the hospitalisation-related and patient-related variables evaluated in this study, D-dimers above 1850 ng/mL was the most useful at predicting major mucosal abnormalities at endoscopy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrial.gov (ID: NCT04318366).