[Rehabilitation needs of geriatric patients in subacute inpatient care after acute inpatient hospitalization-a neglected claim]. / Rehabilitationsbedarf geriatrischer Patienten in Kurzzeitpflege nach akutstationärem Aufenthalt ­ ein vernachlässigter Versorgungsanspruch.

BACKGROUND: Geriatric patients after hospitalization often utilize subacute inpatient care (SC); however, little is known about their care and further health status. OBJECTIVE: To identify persons in SC with rehabilitation needs and improvement potential after hospitalization and to describe the care, relevant parameters of the health status as well as use of medical/nursing services in and after SC. METHODS: After positive screening for previous hospitalization and need of rehabilitation with improvement potential in 13 nursing homes, the length of stay, therapeutic treatments and physician contacts in SC as well as functional parameters, pain, quality of life and the utilization of services according to the Social Security Code V (SGB V) and SGB XI were assessed at baseline, at the end and 3 months after SC. RESULTS: A total of 108 (44%) out of 243 screened persons with previous hospitalization had a need of rehabilitation with improvement potential, of whom 57 participated in the study. In SC (median = 26 days) 35% received no therapeutic treatments and 28% had no physician contact. After SC 40% were transferred to rehabilitation. Participants with rehabilitation transition more frequently received therapeutic treatments in SC (p = 0.021) and were less frequently in long-term care 3 months after SC (p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that a high proportion of persons in SC after hospitalization are in need of rehabilitation with improvement potential, which is not sufficiently treated. Regular therapeutic treatments in SC could improve the transition rate to rehabilitation and subsequent home environment.

[Health economic evaluation of rehabilitative short-term care : Analysis of the costs of geriatric patients with and without rehabilitative short-term care after inpatient hospital stay]. / Gesundheitsökonomische Evaluation einer rehabilitativen Kurzzeitpflege : Ermittlung der Kosten von geriatrischen Patienten mit und ohne rehabilitative Kurzzeitpflege nach stationärem Krankenhausaufenthalt.

BACKGROUND: Geriatric patients requiring rehabilitation and admitted to short-term care after an acute inpatient hospital stay seldom receive rehabilitative services later. Rehabilitative short-term care (REKUP) supplements short-term care with rehabilitative measures, aiming to prevent functional restrictions and long-term care. STUDY OBJECTIVE: To conduct a cost and cost-effectiveness analyses of REKUP and provide data for a nationwide rollout. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A non-randomized controlled prospective study was carried out. The intervention group (IG) was paired 1:2 with a control group (KG), resulting in the formation of three collectives with follow-up periods of either 30, 90 or 180 days (each with IG and KG). Using administrative claims data from the AOK Baden-Württemberg, the mean total costs from the perspective of the health insurance were calculated. A potential impact of the intervention on costs was analyzed using the difference in differences approach. RESULTS: The analysis comprised 129 patients (IG 43; KG 86). During the follow-up periods, the IG presented higher rates of rehabilitation and lower rates of long-term care and mortality. Regarding costs, no statistically significant differences were found between the IG and KG in any of the three collectives. For nursing care and medication costs, costs were significantly higher in the follow-up period for the KG, whereas costs for rehabilitation were significantly higher for the IG (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Patients receiving REKUP utilize rehabilitation services more often and have a lower likelihood of requiring nursing care or dying with no statistically significant differences in costs. There are potential advantages of REKUP in the target population, which warrant further investigation due to methodological limitations.

Job satisfaction and stressors for working in out-of-hours care - a pilot study with general practitioners in a rural area of Germany.

BACKGROUND: Challenging work environment, high workload, and increasing physician shortages characterize current rural general practice in Germany and in most European Countries. These factors extend into Out-Of-Hours Care (OOHC). However, little research about potential stressors for general practitioners (GPs) in OOHC settings is available. This pilot study aimed to evaluate workload, different elements of job satisfaction and stressors for GPs in OOHC and to analyze whether these aspects are associated with overall job satisfaction. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey with a sample of 320 GPs who are working in OOHC was used to measure workload in OOHC, job satisfaction (using the Warr-Cook-Wall scale) and stressors with the effort-reward imbalance questionnaire. In order to assess associations between workload, job satisfaction and stressors at work we performed descriptive analyses as well as multivariable regression analyses. RESULTS: The response rate was 40.9%. Over 80% agreed that OOHC was perceived as a stressor and 79% agreed that less OOHC improved job satisfaction. Only 42% of our sample were satisfied with their overall job satisfaction. The regression analysis showed that the modification of current OOHC organization was significantly associated with overall job satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that OOHC in the current form is a relevant stressor in daily work of rural GPs in Germany and one of the reasons for a decreasing overall job satisfaction. Strategic changes such as the implementation of structural reforms e.g. reducing frequency of OOHC duties for each GP and improving continuing professional development options related to OOHC are needed to address current workload challenges experienced by GPs providing OOHC in Germany.

[Prevalence, comorbidity and interdisciplinary treatment of rheumatoid arthritis - Insurance data on outpatient and inpatient care in Baden-Württemberg]. / Prävalenz, Komorbidität und interdisziplinäre Versorgung der Rheumatoiden Arthritis ­ Versicherungsdaten zur ambulanten und stationären Versorgung in Baden-Württemberg.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has an increased number of comorbidities compared with the general population. OBJECTIVE: Study aim was to collect epidemiological data on prevalence, incidence and comorbidities of RA as well as utilization of outpatient and inpatient care services. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In an age and gender-adjusted case control study, a total of 3.4 million patients insured by the AOK Baden-Württemberg were analysed with respect to visits to physicians, prevalence, incidence and comorbidities of RA. The study was based on out- and inpatient diagnoses from 2013. RESULTS: The RA prevalence was 0.64% (n = 26,919), the incidence was 0.04%. Patients with RA have significant more comorbidities in almost all diagnosis groups, especially in musculoskeletal and cardiovascular diseases, compared to a control group (n = 181,209). 22.8% of RA patients had not contacted an internist rheumatologist, orthopedist or orthopedic surgeon. Biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were almost exclusively prescribed by internist rheumatologists, while conventional DMARDs were equally prescribed by general practitioners and rheumatologists. Of the RA patients 32.6% were hospitalized at least once a year and were nearly twice as frequently inpatient as the control group. CONCLUSION: RA patients need more in- and outpatient healthcare services and suffer significantly more often from comorbidities. The general practitioner is the most frequently visited physician. Other consulted physicians are rheumatologists, ophthalmologists, orthopedists/orthopedic surgeons and internists not specialized in rheumatology. The study highlights the need to create consensus treatment algorithms and maintain a close interdisciplinary and intersectoral cooperation and communication.

[Out-of-hours primary care in Germany: general practitioners' views on the current situation]. / Ärztlicher Bereitschaftsdienst in Deutschland: Befragung von Bereitschaftsdienstärzten zur gegenwärtigen Situation (Kritische Aussagen).

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore views, experiences und perspectives of German GPs related to current out-of-hours service provision covering both urban and rural settings. METHODS: In the context of the international project EurOOHnet (European Research Network for Out-of-Hours Primary Health Care) the German members (of EurOOHnet) developed a questionnaire about organisational structures, infrastructure requirements and the procedures of information flow between regular care and out-of-hours care in 2011. This questionnaire was adopted in every participating country. A comprehensive postal questionnaire was sent to 410 feneral practice cooperatives in Germany. Qualitative content analysis and an inductive reasoning process, supported by the use of Atlas.ti, were used to identify key themes from responses to open-ended questions in the survey. Results were grouped into 3 overarching categories and each of these were grouped into 3 sub-categories. RESULTS: The questionnaire response rate was 44% (181/410). The analysis identified organisational issues (e. g., financing) and infrastructure barriers (e. g., lack of motivated GPs for out-of-hours care) as key themes. Significantly, different priorities between rural and urban GPs were identified. In particular, rural GPs highlighted shortages of GPs and distance between the GP practice and patients' residence as concerning factors impacting on out-of-hours care. CONCLUSIONS: Based on reported views from survey respondents, urban and rural primary care service needs vary significantly and, therefore, different solutions are needed to improve out-of-hours primary care and optimise service quality.