RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Most individuals with depression go unidentified and untreated. In 2016 the US Preventive Services Task Force released guidelines recommending universal screening in primary care to identify patients with depression and to link them to treatment. Feasible, acceptable, and effective strategies to implement these guidelines are needed. METHODS: This three-phased study employed rapid participatory methods to design and test strategies to increase depression screening at Penn Medicine, a large health system with 90 primary care practices. First, researchers solicited ideas and barriers from stakeholders to increase screening using an innovation tournament-a crowdsourcing method that invites stakeholders to submit ideas to address a workplace challenge. Second, a panel of stakeholders and scientists deliberated over and ranked the tournament ideas. An instant runoff election was held to select the winning idea. Third, the research team piloted the winning idea in a primary care practice using rapid prototyping, an approach that quickly refines and iterates strategy designs. RESULTS: The innovation tournament yielded 31 ideas and 32 barriers from diverse stakeholders (12 primary care physicians, 10 medical assistants, 4 nurse practitioners, 2 practice managers, and 4 patient support assistants). A panel of 6 stakeholders and scientists deliberated on the ideas and voted for patient self-report (i.e., through tablet computers, text message, or an online patient portal) as the winning idea. The research team rapid prototyped tablets in one primary care practice with one physician over 5 five-hour shifts to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of the strategy. Most patients, the physician, and medical assistants found the tablets acceptable and feasible. However, patient support assistants struggled to incorporate them in their workflow and expressed concerns about scaling up the process. Depression screening rates were higher using tablets compared to usual care; follow-up was comparable between tablets and usual care. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid participatory methods engaged and amplified the voices of diverse stakeholders in primary care. These methods helped design an acceptable and feasible implementation strategy that showed promise for increasing depression screening in a primary care setting. The next step is to evaluate the strategy in a randomized controlled trial across primary care practices.
Asunto(s)
Depresión , Atención Primaria de Salud , Depresión/diagnóstico , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Proyectos de Investigación , Lugar de TrabajoRESUMEN
The Graduate Medical Education (GME) system in the United States (US) has garnered worldwide respect, graduating over 25,000 new physicians from over 8,000 residency and fellowship programs annually. GME is the portal of entry to medical practice and licensure in the US, and the pathway through which resident physicians develop the competence to practice independently and further develop their career plans. The number and specialty distribution of available GME positions shapes the overall composition of our national workforce; however, GME is failing to provide appropriate programs that support the delivery of our society's system of healthcare. This paper, prepared by the Health Policy Education Subcommittee of the Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM) and unanimously endorsed by SGIM's Council, outlines a set of recommendations on how to reform the GME system to best prepare a physician workforce that can provide high quality, high value, population-based, and patient-centered health care, aligned with the dynamic needs of our nation's healthcare delivery system. These recommendations include: accurate workforce needs assessment, broadened GME funding sources, increased transparency of the use of GME dollars, and implementation of incentives to increase the accountability of GME-funded programs for the preparation and specialty selection of their program graduates.
Asunto(s)
Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/organización & administración , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/métodos , Médicos/provisión & distribución , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/economía , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/tendencias , Apoyo Financiero , Humanos , Evaluación de Necesidades , Médicos de Atención Primaria/provisión & distribuciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Primary prevention of intimate partner violence (IPV) at the level of the primary care provider is unexplored. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify whether men disclose current IPV perpetration when asked by a primary care provider. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive male patients of 6 providers in public health, university, and VA hospital clinics. MEASUREMENTS: Men were screened for IPV perpetration during routine visits, then given a Conflict Tactics Scale questionnaire (CTS2) to complete and mail back anonymously. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-eight men were screened; 46 (36%) returned CTS2 questionnaires. Twenty-three and 2 men disclosed past and current perpetration to providers, respectively. Providers assessed lethality/safety issues in 58% of those reporting a perpetration history (including both with current perpetration), responded with direct counseling to 63% (including both with current perpetration), and referred 17% for services related to the screening (including 1 with current perpetration). Nine and 26 men reported current, CTS2-assessed physical and psychological aggression of a partner, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Men appear to underreport current IPV perpetration in face-to-face primary care encounters when compared to other methods of reporting. Men may more readily report past IPV perpetration in face-to-face encounters.
Asunto(s)
Violencia Doméstica/estadística & datos numéricos , Tamizaje Masivo , Atención Primaria de Salud , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Funciones de Verosimilitud , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Graduate medical education (GME) in the United States is financed by contributions from both federal and state entities that total over $15 billion annually. Within institutions, these funds are distributed with limited transparency to achieve ill-defined outcomes. To address this, the Institute of Medicine convened a committee on the governance and financing of GME to recommend finance reform that would promote a physician training system that meets society's current and future needs. The resulting report provided several recommendations regarding the oversight and mechanisms of GME funding, including implementation of performance-based GME payments, but did not provide specific details about the content and development of metrics for these payments. To initiate a national conversation about performance-based GME funding, the authors asked: What should GME be held accountable for in exchange for public funding? In answer to this question, the authors propose 17 potential performance-based metrics for GME funding that could inform future funding decisions. Eight of the metrics are described as exemplars to add context and to help readers obtain a deeper understanding of the inherent complexities of performance-based GME funding. The authors also describe considerations and precautions for metric implementation.
Asunto(s)
Financiación del Capital/métodos , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/economía , Reembolso de Incentivo/tendencias , Financiación del Capital/tendencias , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/tendencias , Humanos , National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, U.S., Health and Medicine Division/organización & administración , Apoyo a la Formación Profesional/economía , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Attentional inhibitory deficits expressed as difficulty ignoring irrelevant stimuli in the pursuit of goal-directed behavior may serve as a fundamental mechanism of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Evidence of inhibitory processes as central to extinction suggests that exposure-based treatments may act more directly on the inhibitory deficits implicated in PTSD, whereas, in facilitating serotonergic neurotransmission, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) may be less direct and bring about general neurochemical changes in the fear circuitry. If these inhibitory deficits underlie PTSD, then inhibition should improve with successful treatment, with those treated with prolonged exposure (PE) potentially resulting in greater changes in inhibition than those treated with sertraline. METHOD: Changes in temporal attentional inhibition, using an attentional blink (AB) paradigm, were examined at pre- and posttreatment in 49 individuals (74.5% female, 66.7% Caucasian, age M = 37.69, SD = 12.8 years) with chronic PTSD. Participants completed 10 weeks of either PE or sertraline. RESULTS: Individuals who made greater improvements with PE showed faster improvements in temporal inhibition on the critical inhibitory lag of AB than those who made greater improvements with sertraline (d = 0.94). These changes could not be accounted for by basic attention. CONCLUSIONS: Greater improvement in fundamental attentional inhibitory processes with better treatment response to PE, compared with sertraline, suggests potential specificity in how PTSD treatments normalize inhibitory processes, such that exposure-based treatments like PE may target inhibitory processes and improve basic inhibitory functioning.
Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Atención/efectos de los fármacos , Inhibición Psicológica , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Sertralina/uso terapéutico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
Fitz-Hugh-Curtis syndrome--inflammation of the liver capsule associated with genital tract infection--occurs in up to one fourth of patients with pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). Classically presenting as sharp, pleuritic right upper quadrant pain, usually but not always accompanied by signs of salpingitis, it can mimic many other common disorders such as cholecystitis and pyelonephritis.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Hepatitis/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Inflamatoria Pélvica/diagnóstico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cefotetán/uso terapéutico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Gonorrea/tratamiento farmacológico , Hepatitis/etiología , Humanos , Enfermedad Inflamatoria Pélvica/complicaciones , Enfermedad Inflamatoria Pélvica/tratamiento farmacológico , SíndromeRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study examined relationships between substance use patterns and problems and sexual health outcomes among low-income, urban, African-American female adolescents with a history of seeking mental health services. METHODS: Participants were recruited from outpatient mental health clinics serving urban, primarily low-income youth and families in Chicago, Illinois, as part of a 2-year, longitudinal investigation of HIV risk behavior during which they completed interviews every 6 months (five time points). Girls who completed at least one follow-up interview were invited to participate in a sixth wave of assessment to assess trauma exposure, substance use problems, and sexual risk. The current study (n = 177) examined the association between sexual risk behavior and substance use problems reported at the most recent interview (ages 14-22) and substance use patterns and sexually transmitted infections (STI) reported at all six times points. Multiple regression examined the combined and unique effects of different patterns of substance use and substance use problems as correlates of sexual risk behavior and STIs. FINDINGS: Substance use problems were associated with increased sexual risk behavior and increased likelihood of experiencing STIs. Substance use patterns were associated with sexual risk behavior. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that specific patterns of substance use and substance use problems are important to address in sexual health promotion among low-income, urban, African-American girls with a history of seeking mental health services. Understanding the nuances of these relationships is important in informing how to best serve this vulnerable group of adolescents who experience significant sexual risk and mental health care disparities.