Effect of accelerated high-fluence riboflavin and rose bengal-mediated corneal cross-linking on resistance to enzymatic digestion.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the effect of high-fluence accelerated corneal cross-linking on the resistance to enzymatic digestion, assessing two chromophore/light combinations: riboflavin/UV-A light (RF/UV-A) and rose bengal/green light (RB/green). METHODS: Freshly prepared ex-vivo porcine corneas (n = 189) were divided into 8 groups groups. Group A corneas were unirradiated controls without chromophore soaking (A0), or soaked with riboflavin (A1) or rose bengal (A2). Group B corneas underwent accelerated epi-off RF/UV-A CXL at fluences of 5.4 J/cm² (B1), 10 J/cm² (B2), or 15 J/cm² (B3). Group C corneas underwent accelerated epi-off RB/green CXL at fluences of either 10 J/cm² (C1) or 15 J/cm² (C2). Following CXL, all corneas were digested in 0.3% collagenase-A solution, and the time until complete dissolution was measured. RESULTS: Non-irradiated controls exposed to RF and RB enhanced corneal resistance to collagenase digestion, with RB having a stronger effect than RF. RF/UV-A-treated corneas showed significantly increased digestion resistance with increasing fluence levels. RB/green-treated corneas displayed enhanced digestion resistance with each increase in fluence up to 10 J/cm²; a 15 J/cm² fluence yielded similar digestion resistance times to a 10 J/cm² fluence, suggesting a plateau effect in accelerated RB/green CXL protocols. CONCLUSIONS: When compared to standard-fluence treatments, high-fluence accelerated epi-off CXL using both riboflavin and rose bengal significantly increases resistance to enzymatic digestion. The optimal settings for clinical protocols might be 15 J/cm² (30 mW/cm² for 8 min 20 s) for RF/UV-A and 10 J/cm² (15 mW/cm² for 11 min 7 s) for RB/Green Light.

The influence of variations in ocular biometric and optical parameters on differences in refractive error.

PURPOSE: To present a paraxial method to estimate the influence of variations in ocular biometry on changes in refractive error (S) at a population level and apply this method to literature data. METHODS: Error propagation was applied to two methods of eye modelling, referred to as the simple method and the matrix method. The simple method defines S as the difference between the axial power and the whole-eye power, while the matrix method uses more accurate ray transfer matrices. These methods were applied to literature data, containing the mean ocular biometry data from the SyntEyes model, as well as populations of premature infants with or without retinopathy, full-term infants, school children and healthy and diabetic adults. RESULTS: Applying these equations to 1000 SyntEyes showed that changes in axial length provided the most important contribution to the variations in refractive error (57%-64%), followed by lens power/gradient index power (16%-31%) and the anterior corneal radius of curvature (10%-13%). All other components of the eye contributed <4%. For young children, the largest contributions were made by variations in axial length, lens and corneal power for the simple method (67%, 23% and 8%, respectively) and by variations in axial length, gradient lens power and anterior corneal curvature for the matrix method (55%, 21% and 14%, respectively). During myopisation, the influence of variations in axial length increased from 54.5% to 73.4%, while changes in corneal power decreased from 9.82% to 6.32%. Similarly, for the other data sets, the largest contribution was related to axial length. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis confirms that the changes in ocular refraction were mostly associated with variations in axial length, lens and corneal power. The relative contributions of the latter two varied, depending on the particular population.

Allowable movement of wavefront-guided contact lens corrections in normal and keratoconic eyes.

PURPOSE: The goal was to use SyntEyes modelling to estimate the allowable alignment error of wavefront-guided rigid contact lens corrections for a range of normal and keratoconic eye aberration structures to keep objectively measured visual image quality at or above average levels of well-corrected normal eyes. Secondary purposes included determining the required radial order of correction, whether increased radial order of the corrections further constrained the allowable alignment error and how alignment constraints vary with keratoconus severity. METHODS: Building on previous work, 20 normal SyntEyes and 20 keratoconic SyntEyes were fitted with optimised wavefront-guided rigid contact lens corrections targeting between three and eight radial orders that drove visual image quality, as measured objectively by the visual Strehl ratio, to near 1 (best possible) over a 5-mm pupil for the aligned position. The resulting wavefront-guided contact lens was then allowed to translate up to ±1 mm in the x- and y-directions and rotate up ±15°. RESULTS: Allowable alignment error changed as a function of the magnitude of aberration structure to be corrected, which depends on keratoconus severity. This alignment error varied only slightly with the radial order of correction above the fourth radial order. To return the keratoconic SyntEyes to average levels of visual image quality depended on maximum anterior corneal curvature (Kmax). Acceptable tolerances for misalignment that returned keratoconic visual image quality to average normal levels varied between 0.29 and 0.63 mm for translation and approximately ±6.5° for rotation, depending on the magnitude of the aberration structure being corrected. CONCLUSIONS: Allowable alignment errors vary as a function of the aberration structure being corrected, the desired goal for visual image quality and as a function of keratoconus severity.

Definitions for Keratoconus Progression and Their Impact on Clinical Practice.

PURPOSE: There is currently no consensus on which keratoconus need cross-linking nor on how to establish progression. This study assessed the performance of diverse progression criteria and compared them with our clinical knowledge of keratoconus evolution. METHODS: This was a retrospective, longitudinal, observational study. Habitual progression criteria, based on (combinations of) keratometry (K MAX ), front astigmatism (A F ), pachymetry (P MIN ), or ABCD progression display, from 906 keratoconus patients were analyzed. For each criterion and cutoff, we calculated %eyes flagged progressive at some point (R PROG ), individual consistency C IND (%examinations after progression detection still considered progressive), and population consistency C POP (% eyes with CIND >66%). Finally, other monotonic and consistent variables, such as front steep keratometry (K 2F ), mean radius of the back surface (R mB ), and the like, were evaluated for the overall sample and subgroups. RESULTS: Using a single criterion (e.g., ∆K MAX >1D) led to high values of R PROG . When combining two, (K MAX and A F ) led to worse C POP and higher variability than (K MAX and P MIN ); alternative criteria such as (K 2F and R mB ) obtained the best C POP and the lowest variability ( P <0.0001). ABC, as defined by its authors, obtained R PROG of 74.2%. Using wider 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) and requiring two parameters over 95CI reduced R PROG to 27.9%. CONCLUSION: Previous clinical studies suggest that 20% to 30% of keratoconus cases are progressive. This clinical R PROG value should be considered when defining KC progression to avoid overtreatment. Using combinations of variables or wider margins for ABC brings R PROG closer to these clinical observations while obtaining better population consistency than current definitions.

Severe Corneal Damage After Minor Eyelid Surgery: A Case Series.

OBJECTIVES: To present three cases of serious corneal complications after seemingly minor and uncomplicated eyelid surgery. METHODS: These cases emphasize the real-world risk of corneal damage after oculoplastic surgery. RESULTS: The first case is a 46-year-old man referred to our department with a corneal perforation after bilateral blepharoplasty of both upper and lower eyelids. The second case concerns a 51-year-old woman who suffered an accidental coagulation of the cornea during the removal of upper eyelid papillomas, and the third case is a 55-year-old woman who had severe corneal thinning accompanied by visual loss after an upper lid blepharoplasty. All patients were stabilized without the need for corneal transplantation, although there were significant corneal scars and sequelae. CONCLUSIONS: Although complications after esthetic oculoplastic surgery are rare, the reported cases show that corneal damage can have a major impact on the patient's vision and quality of life. Strategies such as the use of a corneal shield can be used to mitigate these risks, but their use is debated. Nevertheless, diligent postoperative care is paramount. At the first postoperative visit, a basic visual acuity measurement should be performed. In cases where reduced vision is reported, particularly when accompanied by pain, patients should be urgently referred for specialized eye care.

Comparison of Scheimpflug Corneal Tomography and Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Measurements in Corneal Cystinosis: A Case Series.

PURPOSE: To report the clinical course and compare the utility of Scheimpflug tomography (ST) and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) for central corneal thickness (CCT) and corneal densitometry (CD) assessment in patients with corneal crystals owing to nephropathic cystinosis. METHODS: A retrospective chart analysis of three patients with nephropathic cystinosis and the presence of corneal cystine crystals in both eyes was performed. All patients underwent clinical examination and anterior segment photography, ST, and AS-OCT scans. Corneal densitometry was exported from built-in proprietary software for ST and from custom-made validated software for AS-OCT. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography images were rescaled to grayscale units from 0 (maximum transparency) to 100 (minimum transparency) to match built-in ST densitometry readings. Furthermore, the mean pixel intensity, representative of CD, was calculated from the pixels corresponding to the segmented cornea. RESULTS: All three patients had pathognomonic cystine crystals deposits in the cornea and were treated with cysteamine medications that resulted in clinical improvement. The CCT measured using ST exhibited a range from 560 to 958 µm. Conversely, when assessed with AS-OCT, the CCT varied within the range of 548 to 610 µm. Both examinations could be performed, but in the more severe cases, AS-OCT showed far greater utility to estimate CD. In four of six eyes examined, ST showed disproportionate CCT values, compared with the AS-OCT, whereas reliable CD measurements were only available in AS-OCT. CONCLUSION: The AS-OCT could be considered a baseline ocular measurement in cystinosis and in the evaluation of disease progression and treatment efficacy.

Ocular Surface Homeostasis After Scleral Lens Usage.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this prospective study is to examine the effects of 5 hours of well-fitted, mini-scleral contact lens (mini-SL) wear on the tear film cytokine expression in healthy eyes. METHODS: Twenty-three healthy participants were included in the study. One eye of each participant was selected at random, and a mini-SL measuring 16.5 mm in diameter was fitted by an experienced contact lens specialist. The contact lens remained in place for 5 hours. Precorneal tear fluid was collected using capillary tubes at three different time points: baseline before SL insertion (T0), after 5 hours of SL wear (T1), and 3 hours after SL removal (T2). The concentration of 40 inflammatory cytokines at the three different time points was determined using multiplex bead assay. RESULTS: Mini-scleral lens wear did not result in significant changes in the cytokine-to-protein ratio after 5 hours of wear on a healthy eye. CONCLUSIONS: Although a well-fitted mini-SL reduces the rate at which the precorneal tear film is refreshed, 5 hours of lens wear did not appear to significantly affect the tears cytokine-to-protein ratio, suggesting that scleral lenses have minimal impact on corneal cytokine expression.

Assessing the visual image quality provided by refractive corrections during keratoconus progression.

PURPOSE: To expand the SyntEyes keratoconus (KTC) model to assess the Visual Image Quality (VIQ) of sphero-cylindrical spectacle and rigid contact lens corrections as keratoconus progresses. METHODS: The previously published SyntEyes KTC eye model to determine best sphero-cylindrical spectacle and rigid contact lens correction in keratoconic eyes was expanded to include the natural progression of keratoconus, thus allowing the assessment of corrected VIQ with disease progression. RESULTS: As keratoconus progresses, the pattern of visual Strehl ratio (VSX) in correction space for spectacles alters from a typical hourglass into a shell pattern. The former would guide the subjective refraction towards the optimal correction while the latter is relatively insensitive to large dioptric steps. In 15 out of the 20 SyntEyes, the shell pattern eventually produces two foci on different sides of the correction space separated by a clinically significant dioptric difference with a similar, albeit lower VIQ. Wearing the best possible spectacle corrections provided an average gain of up to 3.5 lines of logMAR visual acuity compared to the uncorrected cases, which increased to 5.5 lines for the best rigid contact lens correction. Continuing to wear a spectacle correction as the disease progresses often leads to a VIQ that is almost as bad as the uncorrected case. Continuing to wear a rigid contact lens correction as the disease progresses maintains a relatively high level of VIQ, albeit in the low range for typically well-corrected normal eyes. CONCLUSIONS: The results reflect the clinical experience that subjective refraction is difficult in highly-aberrated keratoconic eyes, the benefit of spectacle correction is short lived and that rigid contact lenses provide better and more stable VIQ with disease progression. Other aspects, such as the presence and behaviour of the second focus in some cases, remain to be confirmed clinically.

Influence of rigid lens decentration and rotation on visual image quality in normal and keratoconic eyes.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether the movement of a rigid sphero-cylindrical contact lens has a greater impact on the visual image quality in highly aberrated eyes than in normal eyes. METHODS: For 20 normal and 20 keratoconic SyntEyes, a previously determined best sphero-cylindrical rigid lens was permitted to shift by up to ±1 mm from the line of sight and rotate up to ±15°. Each of the 52,111 lens locations sampled was ray-traced to determine the influence on the wavefront aberration. In turn, the logarithm of visual Strehl ratio (log10 [VSX]) was calculated for each aberration structure and was used to estimate the associated changes in logMAR visual acuity. Finally, contour surfaces of two-letter change in visual acuity were plotted in three-dimensional misalignment space, consisting of decentrations in the x and y directions and rotation, and volumes within these surfaces were calculated. RESULTS: The variations in image quality within the misalignment space were unique to each eye. A two-letter loss was generally reached with smaller misalignments in keratoconic eyes (10.5 ± 4.7° of rotation or 0.27 ± 0.13 mm of shift) than in normal eyes (13.4 ± 1.8° and 0.39 ± 0.15 mm, respectively) due to larger cylindrical errors. For keratoconic eyes, on average, 14.4 ± 14.9% of misalignment space saw VSX values above the lower normal VSX threshold, well below the values of normal eyes of 48.5 ± 18.5%. In some eyes, a specific combination of lens shift and lens rotation away from the line of sight leads to a simulated improvement in visual image quality. CONCLUSION: Variations in visual image quality due to the misalignment of rigid sphero-cylindrical contact lens corrections are larger for keratoconic eyes than for normal eyes. In some cases, a specific misalignment may improve visual image quality, which could be considered in the design of the next generation of rigid contact lenses.

Influence of Specialty Contact Lens Wear on Posterior Corneal Tomography in Keratoconus Subjects.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of specialty contact lens (CL) wear on posterior corneal tomography in keratoconus subjects. METHODS: Patients with keratoconus who were wearing specialty CL were included in this retrospective cohort study. Tomographic parameters were evaluated with Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam HR) before lens fitting and immediately after removal of CLs worn habitually for a period of several months. Subjects were divided into groups, according to type of lens (corneal, scleral, and hybrid) and keratoconus severity based on Belin/Ambrosio D (BAD-D) score, for further analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-four eyes of 34 subjects diagnosed with keratoconus were included. Mean duration of habitual CL wear was 7.0±0.3 months. For the entire cohort, a small increase in flat keratometric reading at the anterior corneal surface (K1F; P =0.032) and at the posterior surface (K1B; P =0.041) was found. In the corneal CL group (10 eyes; 29.4%), flattening of the anterior corneal curvature was detected (K max ; P =0.015). An increase in K1B value was seen in the scleral CL group (15 eyes; 44.1%) ( P =0.03). Combined topometric indices showed a small but significant difference in the entire cohort ( P <0.05) and in the subgroups of corneal CL wear and of moderate keratoconus (BAD-D score≥7). CONCLUSION: Various types of specialty CLs exert a differential influence on corneal parameters. A small steepening of keratometry at the posterior surface (K1B) was observed in the scleral lens group. Although corneal lens wear flattens the anterior cornea (K max ), it does not significantly alter the posterior corneal surface.

Densitometry marks delineating the affected area in keratoconus: clinical suitability of a new descriptive system based on its repeatability and reproducibility.

PURPOSE: To present a descriptive system for the elliptic demarcation area seen in keratoconus densitometry maps (obtained with a Scheimpflug tomographer) and to evaluate its suitability for clinical practice. METHODS: The subjects were 30 keratoconus patients at different stages and 20 healthy subjects. The averaged densitometry maps ('two-layers' scan, with fixed layers 120 µm and endothelium) were analysed using a system of four categories (termed 'Brightness', 'Contrast', 'Decentration' and 'Octants surrounded by a dark line') that we created to characterise the demarcation area. Four examiners (three corneal specialists and one junior resident) used the system to classify the maps. The inter-rater agreement was calculated for two subgroups: (1) clinical keratoconus patients and (2) both healthy patients and forme fruste keratoconus patients. Intra-rater agreement was also determined. RESULTS: Inter-rater agreement on classification was higher when analysing clinical keratoconus, reaching levels of substantial agreement. Despite this, only low levels of agreement were found in 'Decentration', penalized due to the skewness in the distribution of this descriptor. Almost perfect intra-rater agreement was obtained for all descriptors in the first subgroup of clinical keratoconus, whereas the agreement was generally moderate within the second subgroup of normal and forme fruste eyes. Agreement was slightly lower with the less experienced observer. At least three observers agreed on four forme fruste keratoconus eyes presenting abnormalities in the images. The observers reported that the 'Brightness' descriptor was subjective and redundant with 'Contrast'. CONCLUSIONS: The description of the area was repeatable and reproducible, and may be a valuable supplement when documenting clinical keratoconus stage and progression in daily practice. However, a minor learning curve was noticed and agreement was higher among the more experienced observers. Since the descriptor 'Brightness' was found to be subjective and redundant, it was excluded from the final proposed classification.

Clinical Outcome of Hybrid Contact Lenses in Keratoconus.

OBJECTIVES: To report the clinical outcome of hybrid contact lens fitting in keratoconus. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of keratoconus patients who had been fitted with hybrid contact lenses in one or both eyes. Patients with a history of previous intraocular surgery (except for corneal crosslinking) and relevant concurrent ocular disease limiting visual outcome were excluded. The outcome data at 6-month follow-up included hybrid lens-corrected visual acuity, wearing time, and lens discontinuation. RESULTS: Fifty-four keratoconus patients (102 eyes) were included. Mean visual acuity with habitual correction before hybrid lens fitting was 0.63±0.29 (decimal Snellen). Eyes were fitted with Eyebrid lenses (LCS Laboratories, Caen, France) and SynergEyes lenses (SynergEyes Inc., Carlsbad, CA). Refits were necessary in 13 eyes, because of poor fitting (76.9%) or suboptimal refraction (23.1%). Visual acuity had significantly improved with hybrid lenses (0.93±0.14; P<0.0001). In 37 eyes (37.8%), hybrid lens wear was discontinued within 6 months after lens fitting. Reported issues were discomfort in 27 eyes (73%), handling difficulties in 14 eyes (37.8%) and poor vision in 1 eye (2.7%). Success rate of lens fitting was significantly correlated to cone morphology (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: New generation hybrid lenses are an appropriate, safe therapeutic option for keratoconus patients. Excellent visual outcomes are achieved in successful fittings, yet a dropout rate of 37.8%-mainly occurring in sagging, more peripheral, cones - still limit their clinical success.

Determining the Most Suitable Tomography-Based Parameters to Describe Progression in Keratoconus. The Retrospective Digital Computer Analysis of Keratoconus Evolution Project.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the most suitable parameters to describe keratoconus progression. METHODS: Longitudinal retrospective cohort study. Monotonicity and consistency of over 250 parameters extracted from the Pentacam tomographies (Oculus, Germany) of 743 patients was analyzed. Repeatability was calculated for 69 patients (published elsewhere). The parameters were scored based on their performance for each desired feature and a global ranking was created. RESULTS: Overall, parameters that average a higher number of corneal points performed better than single-point parameters. Zonal keratometries on areas surrounding the maximum curvature point and the steepest front keratometry performed best, followed by front best-fit sphere and mean keratometry of both surfaces. Platform-dependent indices (e.g., Belin-Ambrósio Deviation- or index height decentration-) obtained good scores, but platform-independent LOGIK performed slightly better. Finally, although minimum radius in both surfaces worked competently, minimum pachymetry (PachyMin) performed considerably poorer. CONCLUSIONS: We presented a list of parameters whose behavior was repeatable, monotonic and consistent, features desirable to describe change. The parameters normally used to follow keratoconus progression may not be the most adequate, as evidenced by the poor performance of PachyMin. Although calculated for a specific Scheimpflug device, most of the best-performing parameters are platform-independent variables, and results may be generalized, pending validation.

Modeling refractive correction strategies in keratoconus.

This work intends to determine the optimal refractive spectacle and scleral lens corrections for keratoconus patients using the visual Strehl (VSX) visual image quality metric and the SyntEyes models with the synthetic biometry of 20 normal eyes and 20 keratoconic eyes. These included the corneal tomography and intraocular biometry. A series of virtual spherocylindrical spectacle and scleral lens corrections spanning the entire phoropter range were separately applied to each eye, followed by ray tracing to determine the residual wavefront aberrations and identify the correction with the highest possible VSX (named a "focus"). To speed up calculations, a smart scanning algorithm was used, consisting of three consecutive scans over increasingly finer dioptric grids. In the dioptric space, the VSX pattern for normal eyes considered over the correction range for either spectacle or scleral lens corrections resembled an hourglass with one distinct focus and a quick drop in VSX away from that focus. For 18 of the 20 keratoconic eyes, the spectacle-corrected VSX pattern resembled a shell that in 9 of the 20 cases showed two foci separated by a large dioptric distance (13.3 ± 4.9 diopters). In keratoconic eyes, scleral lenses also produced hourglass patterns, but with a VSX lower than in normal eyes. The hourglass pattern in dioptric space shows how, in normal eyes, the refracting process automatically funnels practitioners toward the optimal correction. The shell patterns in keratoconus, however, present far more complexity and, possibly, multiple foci. Depending on the starting point, refracting procedures may lead to a local maximum rather than the optimal correction.

Characterisation of Gel-Forming Mucins Produced In Vivo and In Ex Vivo Conjunctival Explant Cultures.

One key element to the health of the ocular surface encompasses the presence of gel-forming mucins in the pre-ocular tear film. Conjunctival goblet cells are specialized epithelial cells that secrete mucins necessary for tear film stability and general homeostasis. Their dysfunction can be linked to a range of ocular surface inflammation disorders and chronic injuries. To obtain new perspectives and angles to tackle mucin deficiency, the need for an accurate evaluation of their presence and corresponding mucin secretion in ex vivo conjunctival cultures has become a requisite. In vitro, goblet cells show a significant decrease in the production and secretion of gel-forming mucins, accompanied by signs of dedifferentiation or transdifferentiation. Explant cultures on laminin-treated CLP-PEG hydrogels can, however, support the production of gel-forming mucins. Together, we challenge the current paradigm to evaluate the presence of cultured goblet cells solely based on their general mucin (MUC) content through imaging analyses, showing the need for additional techniques to assess the functionality of goblet cells. In addition, we broadened the gel-forming mucin profile of in vivo goblet cells with MUC5B and MUC6, while MUC2 and MUC6 is added to the profile of cultured goblet cells.

Pterygium Pathology: A Prospective Case-Control Study on Tear Film Cytokine Levels.

Pterygium is a common eye disease, linked to an increased exposure to UV radiation and dry environments. The associated pathology culminates in visual impairment and, in some rare cases, blindness. However, there remains a lot of uncertainty concerning the pathogenesis of this fibrovascular lesion. As the composition of the tear film provides a reflection into the pathological changes at the ocular surface, tear analysis represents an ideal approach to gain insight in the progression of disease following pterygiectomy. This study enrolled 19 patients and age/gender-matched healthy controls. Tear film levels of interleukin- (IL-) 6, IL-8, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were investigated over time, and preoperative concentrations were linked to corneal neovascularization and pterygium size. Diminished tear film levels were found in unilateral patients who show no clinical signs of pterygium recurrence over a period of one year. Hence, our results highlight the potential of using the course of IL-6, IL-8, and VEGF levels in tears as biomarkers for recovery. In addition, when focusing on the affected eyes (i.e., primary and recurrent pterygium), we detected fold changes in preoperative cytokine concentrations to correspond with disease severity. As our proposed biomarkers did not reveal a linear relationship with corneal neovascularization nor the invasive behaviour of pterygium, no exact role in the pterygium pathology could be established. Hence, our data point to these factors being contributors rather than decisive players in the pathological processes.

Diagnostic Challenges in Nocardia Keratitis.

OBJECTIVE: To present a case of diagnostic confusion in Nocardia keratitis in a contact lens wearer and to illustrate the characteristic clinical findings of this rare entity. METHODS: Case report of Nocardia keratitis that was mistaken for acanthamoeba, herpetic, and fungal keratitis in three tertiary corneal referral centers before the correct diagnosis of Nocardia infection was made. RESULTS: A 29-year-old contact lens wearer was referred to our hospital for a contact lens-associated bacterial keratitis, not improving under standard bacterial treatment. Biomicroscopy revealed a circular corneal ulcer and pinhead lesions arranged in a wreath pattern. Initial scraping revealed no positive cultures and confocal microscopy findings were suspicious for fungal keratitis. Only after a poor response to protozoal and fungal treatment, and a negative herpes serology, Nocardia was suspected. This suspicion was confirmed with a positive culture and the topical amikacin and ciprofloxacin were started. The infiltrate responded promptly and resolved, leaving a small corneal scar and a good visual recovery. CONCLUSION: Because of its infrequent occurrence and its variable clinical picture, Nocardia keratitis is easily misdiagnosed. Although a rare entity, this infection should be added to the differential diagnosis in contact lens-related keratitis not responding to first-line antibiotics and presenting with patchy anterior stromal infiltrates.

A Case of Late Spontaneous Post-Radial Keratotomy Corneal Perforation Managed With Specialty Lenses.

PURPOSE: To describe a case of spontaneous wound dehiscence 29 years after radial keratotomy (RK) and to illustrate how specialty contact lenses were used for tectonic support and optic correction. SETTING: Tertiary referral center for corneal pathology. DESIGN: Case report. RESULTS: In November 2014, a 62-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with a spontaneous corneal perforation in her left eye. Her ocular history was significant only for uncomplicated RK surgery performed in 1985 to correct myopia (-5.50 D) in both eyes. At the slit-lamp pronounced, bullous edema was seen in the inferotemporal quadrant of the left cornea with internal opening of the 3.30- and 5-o'clock positions incisions and severe localized thinning and aqueous leakage at the 5-o'clock position incision. There was no history of trauma. A conservative approach was adopted: application of a standard bandage lens was effective in tamponading the leakage, allowing the anterior chamber to reform; a custom-made soft lens was worn for tectonic support over a period of 4 months. Finally, visual acuity was restored to 20/20-by fitting a scleral lens. CONCLUSION: Spontaneous corneal perforation is a rare but more dramatic long-term complication after RK. The pivotal role of appropriately fitted soft bandage lenses in the conservative management of this type of complex perforation is highlighted. For optical correction, a scleral lens was fitted with excellent visual result, illustrating the added value of specialty contact lenses as an alternative to surgery in the management of postrefractive corneas.

Bigaussian Wavefront Model for Normal and Keratoconic Eyes.

PURPOSE: To report bigaussian multivariate wavefront models capable of stochastically generating an unlimited amount of plausible wavefront data for either normal or keratoconic eyes. METHODS: The models use centroid wavefront data measured previously with an iTrace in 330 healthy right eyes and 122 keratoconic right eyes. These centroids were fitted to an 11th-order Zernike series, followed by principal component analysis to reduce dimensionality and remove correlations. The remaining parameters were then fitted to a sum of two multivariate Gaussian distributions. This fit then forms the core of the stochastic model, which may be used to generate synthetic data. Finally, the agreement between the original and synthetic data was tested using two one-sided t tests. RESULTS: For normal eyes, the first eigenvectors mostly represent pure Zernike polynomials, with a decreasing degree of purity with increasing order. For keratoconic eyes, eigenvector purity was considerably lower than for normal eyes. Depending on the data set, series of 22 to 29 eigenvectors were found sufficient for accurate wavefront reconstruction (i.e., root-mean-square errors below 0.05 µm). These eigenvectors were then used as a base for the stochastic models. In all models and all Zernike coefficients, the mean of the synthetic data was significantly equal to that of the original data (two one-sided t test, P > .05/75), but the variability of the synthetic data is often significantly lower (F test, P < .05/75). CONCLUSIONS: This synthetic wavefront model may be safely used in calculations as an alternative to actual measurements should such data not be available.

SyntEyes KTC: higher order statistical eye model for developing keratoconus.

PURPOSE: To present and validate a stochastic eye model for developing keratoconus to e.g. improve optical corrective strategies. This could be particularly useful for researchers that do not have access to original keratoconic data. METHODS: The Scheimpflug tomography, ocular biometry and wavefront of 145 keratoconic right eyes were collected. These data were processed using principal component analysis for parameter reduction, followed by a multivariate Gaussian fit that produces a stochastic model for keratoconus (SyntEyes KTC). The output of this model is filtered to remove the occasional incorrect topography patterns by either an automatic or manual procedure. Finally, the output of this keratoconus model is matched to that of the original model for normal eyes using the non-corneal biometry to obtain a description of keratoconus development. RESULTS: The synthetic data generated by the model were found to be significantly equal to the original data (non-parametric Mann-Whitney equivalence test; 145/154 passed). The variability of the synthetic data, however, was often significantly less than that of the original data, especially for the higher order Zernike terms of corneal elevation (non-parametric Levene test; p < 0.05/154). These results remained generally the same after applying either filter procedure to remove the synthetic eyes with incorrect topographies. Interpolation between matched pairs of normal and keratoconic SyntEyes appears to provide an adequate model for keratoconus progression. CONCLUSION: The synthetic data provided by the proposed keratoconus model closely resembles actual clinical data and may be used for a range of research applications when (sufficient) real data is not available.