Addition of PEG-interferon to long-term nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy enhances HBsAg decline and clearance in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B: Multicentre Randomized Trial (PAS Study).

We studied whether 48 weeks of PEG-IFN alfa-2a add-on increases HBsAg-decline and clearance in HBeAg-negative patients on long-term nucleo(s)tide analogue (NA) therapy. In this investigator-initiated, randomized, controlled trial conducted in Europe and Canada, HBeAg-negative patients treated with NA > 12 months, with HBVDNA < 200 IU/mL, were enrolled. Patients were randomized 2:1 to 48 weeks of PEG-IFN alfa-2a add-on (180 µg per week) or continued NA-monotherapy with subsequent follow-up to Week 72. Endpoints were HBsAg decline (≥1 log10 IU/mL) and HBsAg clearance at Week 48. Of the 86 patients in the modified-intention-to-treat analysis, 58 patients received PEG-IFN add-on, and 28 continued NA monotherapy. At Week 48, 16(28%) patients achieved HBsAg decline ≥1 log10 in the add-on arm versus none on NA-monotherapy (p < .001), and HBsAg clearance was observed in 6 (10%) PEG-IFN add-on patients versus 0% NA-monotherapy (p = .01). HBVRNA was only detected in 2% after PEG-IFN treatment versus 19% in NA-monotherapy (p = .002) at Week 48. PEG-IFN add-on therapy was well tolerated in majority of patients. Low baseline HBsAg levels (<10 IU/mL) identified patients most likely to achieve HBsAg loss with PEG-IFN add-on, whereas an HBsAg level > 200 IU/mL at on-treatment Week 12 was highly predictive of non-response (NPV = 100%). Addition of PEG-IFN to long-term NA enhanced HBsAg decline and increased the chance of HBsAg clearance in HBeAg-negative patients on long-term NA. On-treatment HBsAg levels >200 IU/mL identify patients unlikely to benefit from PEG-IFN add-on and could be used as a potential stopping-rule for PEG-IFN therapy. Our findings support further exploration of immune modulation add-on to antiviral therapy, preferably using response-guided strategies, to increase functional cure rates in patients with CHB.

Low Rate of Hepatitis B Reactivation Among Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C During Direct Acting Antiviral Therapy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation has been reported in patients co-infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) during direct acting antiviral (DAA) therapy, leading the United States Food and Drug Administration (U.S. FDA) to issue a black box warning on all DAA drug labels recommending monitoring for HBV reactivation. We conducted a comprehensive evaluation to assess the rate of HBV reactivation among patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) during DAA therapy. METHODS: Patients with CHC and recovered HBV infection (hepatitis B surface antigen negative (HBsAg)/anti-hepatitis B core positive), treated with DAAs were included if stored sera were available. Samples were tested for HBV DNA, HBsAg, and ALT. HBV reactivation was considered if (1) HBV DNA was undetectable pre-DAA therapy and became detectable post-therapy, or (2) HBV DNA was detectable pre-treatment, but not quantifiable (< 20 IU/mL) and became quantifiable post-treatment. RESULT: 79 patients with median age of 62 years were included. 68% were male and Caucasian. Various DAA regimens were administered for 12-24 weeks. Reactivation occurred in 8/79 (10%) of patients and occurred more frequently in men compared to women: 6 during treatment and 2 after treatment. Neither an ALT flare nor HBsAg seroreversion were observed. Detectable HBV DNA was transient in 5/8 and could not be determined in 3/8 but ALT flares were not observed in follow-up of these patients. CONCLUSION: The risk of HBV reactivation was low in CHC patients with resolved HBV during DAA therapy. Our data support testing for HBV DNA only in selected patients with ALT flares or failure of ALT normalization during DAA treatment.

The Inflammatory Cytokine Profile Associated With Liver Damage Is Broader and Stronger in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B Compared to Patients With Acute Hepatitis B.

Liver damage in hepatitis B is immune driven and correlates with inflammatory markers in patient serum. There is no comparison of these markers to determine if inflammatory profiles are distinct to different types of liver damage across patients at different stages of disease. We measured 25 inflammatory markers in patients with acute hepatitis B and chronic hepatitis B with hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion and chronic patients stopping nucleoside analogue therapy. Myeloid markers dominated the inflammatory profile in all stages of hepatitis B. More inflammatory markers were detectable in chronic patients, including elevated concentrations of cytotoxic effectors Fas ligand, TRAIL, and TNF-α.

Early virologic relapse predicts alanine aminotransferase flares after nucleos(t)ide analogue withdrawal in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

When patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) stop nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy before achieving HBsAg loss, flares often ensue which are challenging to predict early. We determined the incidence, severity, outcome and predictors of flares after NA withdrawal. Forty-five patients enrolled in an RCT were included; 107 patients from an external, prospective cohort were used for validation. Retreatment criteria were pre-defined. Pre- and post-treatment predictors of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) flare (>5× ULN) were evaluated by Cox proportional-hazards regression. Seventy-two weeks after NA withdrawal, 23/45 (51%) patients had developed >5× ULN and 14 (31%) >20× ULN. Median time to develop ALT >5× ULN was 12 weeks after NA withdrawal. Independent predictors of ALT >5× ULN were male sex (HR [95% CI] 3.2 [1.2-8.9]; p = 0.03) and serum HBV DNA (1.2 [1.0-1.8]; p = 0.03) at Week 6 off-therapy. Specifically, week 6 HBV DNA >10,000 IU/ml predicted ALT >5× ULN (3.4 [1.4-8.4]; p = 0.01), which was externally validated. In conclusion, this study on post-treatment flares revealed a high cumulative incidence in CHB. Week 6 HBV DNA >10,000 IU/ml independently predicted flares. The proposed threshold enables prediction of imminent flares in patients who may benefit from closer monitoring and earlier retreatment.

Maintained virological suppression and renal function with reduced dose tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in renally impaired chronic hepatitis B patients.

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) effectively suppresses viral replication in chronic hepatitis B (CHB), but occasionally leads to renal impairment. We evaluated the prevalence of viral and biochemical breakthrough and renal function kinetics in renally impaired patients with CHB on reduced and on full-dose TDF. This clinic-based longitudinal cohort study included patients receiving full and reduced dose TDF (due to eGFR [Cockcroft-Gault] <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 ). Viral and biochemical breakthroughs were assessed 1 month after starting full and reduced TDF dose until the end-of-follow-up. Breakthroughs were studied in full and reduced dose TDF, and renal function (MDRD) longitudinally before and after dose reduction within patients starting on full-dose TDF. Of 750 patients on TDF, 78 (10%) had reduced dose and 672 (90%) full dose. At the time of dose reduction, 36 (46%) patients had chronic kidney disease stage G3B. A viral breakthrough occurred in one cirrhotic dialysis-dependent patient (dosed 300 mg weekly) which resolved without signs of decompensation, and in one patient on full dose which resolved spontaneously. One biochemical breakthrough occurred during dose reduction and resolved naturally without viral breakthrough. The MDRD improved within the first year of dose reduction (+3.0 [2.5] mL/min per year; P < .005) and remained stable thereafter. Fifty-three (79%) patients reached an MDRD >50 mL/min during dose reduction. Low dose TDF maintains renal function and viral suppression in most renally impaired patients with CHB, even in those with advanced liver disease. This useful, yet simple strategy could be particularly viable in resource-constrained settings.

Limited sustained response after stopping nucleos(t)ide analogues in patients with chronic hepatitis B: results from a randomised controlled trial (Toronto STOP study).

OBJECTIVE: Although most patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) reach effective virological suppression with long-term nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) therapy, some might not need to continue treatment for life. In this randomised, controlled, phase IV trial, we evaluated off-therapy outcomes in patients after discontinuing long-term NA therapy. DESIGN: Patients who had received NA therapy for ≥1 year and achieved virological suppression (hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion combined with undetectable hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA ≥12 months in HBeAg-positive patients or undetectable HBV DNA ≥36 months in HBeAg-negative patients) were randomised 2:1 to stop or continue NA therapy for 72 weeks. Sustained disease remission (HBeAg negative, HBV DNA <2000 IU/mL and normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT)) was evaluated at 72 weeks after stopping NA therapy. RESULTS: Among 67 enrolled patients, sustained disease remission was observed in 13/45 (29%) stop versus 18/22 (82%) continue patients. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss occurred in two patients (one in each group). The median HBsAg decline from randomisation to week 72 was similar in both groups (0.2 (0.0-0.4) vs 0.1 (0.0-0.2) log IU/mL in stop vs continue patients). Among patients who stopped, 15/45 (33%) had virological or biochemical relapse and 17/45 (38%) were retreated according to predefined criteria. A total of 11/18 (61%) pretreatment HBeAg-positive versus 6/27 (22%) HBeAg-negative patients required retreatment (p=0.01). Fourteen (31%) patients developed ALT >10× upper limit of normal (ULN) and another 7 (16%) had ALT >5× ULN. No patients experienced liver decompensation or died. CONCLUSION: The findings of this prospective study suggest limited benefit of stopping NA therapy in chronic hepatitis B. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01911156.

Prevalence and predictors of complementary and alternative medicine modalities in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) can interact with antiviral treatment or influence health-seeking behaviour. We aimed to study the use of individual CAM modalities in CHB and explore determinants of use, particularly migration-related, socio-economic and clinical factors. METHODS: A total of 436 CHB outpatients who attended the Toronto Centre for Liver Disease in 2015-2016 were included in this cross-sectional study. Using the comprehensive I-CAM questionnaire and health records, data were collected on socio-demographic and clinical variables and on usage of 16 CAM modalities in the last year. RESULTS: Sixty percent of patients were male, 74% were Asian and 46% were using antiviral treatment. Three-hundred and nine (71%) patients used CAM. Vitamin/mineral preparations (45% of patients) were most commonly used. Overall CAM use and the specific use of potentially injurious CAM, such as green tea extract (9.2%) and St. John's wort (0.2%), were not associated with liver disease severity. Female sex, family history of CHB, lower serum HBV DNA, and higher socio-economic status were independently associated with bio-holistic CAM use, the clinically most-relevant CAM group (P < 0.05); ethnicity, antiviral therapy use and liver disease severity were not. CONCLUSIONS: CAM use among CHB patients was extensive, especially use of vitamin and mineral preparations, but without direct influence on liver disease severity. Bio-holistic CAM use appeared to be associated with socio-economic status rather than with ethnicity or liver disease severity. Despite the rare use of hepatotoxins, physicians should actively inquire about it.

Low hepatitis B surface antigen and HBV DNA levels predict response to the addition of pegylated interferon to entecavir in hepatitis B e antigen positive chronic hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND: Various treatment combinations of peginterferon (PEG-IFN) and nucleos(t)ide analogues have been evaluated for chronic hepatitis B (CHB), but the optimal regimen remains unclear. AIMS: To study whether PEG-IFN add-on increases response compared to entecavir (ETV) monotherapy, and whether the duration of ETV pretreatment influences response. METHODS: Response was evaluated in HBeAg positive patients previously treated in two randomized controlled trials. Patients received ETV pretreatment for at least 24 weeks and were then allocated to 24-48 weeks of ETV+PEG-IFN add-on, or continued ETV monotherapy. Response was defined as HBeAg loss combined with HBV DNA <200 IU/mL 48 weeks after discontinuing PEG-IFN. RESULTS: Of 234 patients, 118 were assigned PEG-IFN add-on and 116 continued ETV monotherapy. Response was observed in 38/118 (33%) patients treated with add-on therapy and in 23/116 (20%) with monotherapy (P = 0.03). The highest response to add-on therapy compared to monotherapy was observed in PEG-IFN naive patients with HBsAg levels below 4000 IU/mL and HBV DNA levels below 50 IU/mL at randomization (70% vs 34%; P = 0.01). Above the cut-off levels, response was low and not significantly different between treatment groups. Duration of ETV pretreatment was associated with HBsAg and HBV DNA levels (both P < 0.005), but not with response (P = 0.82). CONCLUSIONS: PEG-IFN add-on to ETV therapy was associated with higher response compared to ETV monotherapy in patients with HBeAg positive CHB. Response doubled in PEG-IFN naive patients with HBsAg below 4000 IU/mL and HBV DNA below 50 IU/mL, and therefore identifies them as the best candidates for PEG-IFN add-on (Identifiers: NCT00877760, NCT01532843).