Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 64
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 121(2): e2315463120, 2024 Jan 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38181058

RESUMEN

Schistosomiasis is a neglected tropical disease affecting over 150 million people. Hotspots of Schistosoma transmission-communities where infection prevalence does not decline adequately with mass drug administration-present a key challenge in eliminating schistosomiasis. Current approaches to identify hotspots require evaluation 2-5 y after a baseline survey and subsequent mass drug administration. Here, we develop statistical models to predict hotspots at baseline prior to treatment comparing three common hotspot definitions, using epidemiologic, survey-based, and remote sensing data. In a reanalysis of randomized trials in 589 communities in five endemic countries, a regression model predicts whether Schistosoma mansoni infection prevalence will exceed the WHO threshold of 10% in year 5 ("prevalence hotspot") with 86% sensitivity, 74% specificity, and 93% negative predictive value (NPV; assuming 30% hotspot prevalence), and a regression model for Schistosoma haematobium achieves 90% sensitivity, 90% specificity, and 96% NPV. A random forest model predicts whether S. mansoni moderate and heavy infection prevalence will exceed a public health goal of 1% in year 5 ("intensity hotspot") with 92% sensitivity, 79% specificity, and 96% NPV, and a boosted trees model for S. haematobium achieves 77% sensitivity, 95% specificity, and 91% NPV. Baseline prevalence is a top predictor in all models. Prediction is less accurate in countries not represented in training data and for a third hotspot definition based on relative prevalence reduction over time ("persistent hotspot"). These models may be a tool to prioritize high-risk communities for more frequent surveillance or intervention against schistosomiasis, but prediction of hotspots remains a challenge.


Asunto(s)
Esquistosomiasis mansoni , Esquistosomiasis , Humanos , Animales , Administración Masiva de Medicamentos , Esquistosomiasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Esquistosomiasis/epidemiología , Esquistosomiasis mansoni/tratamiento farmacológico , Esquistosomiasis mansoni/epidemiología , Schistosoma haematobium , Modelos Estadísticos
2.
N Engl J Med ; 388(16): 1491-1500, 2023 Apr 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37075141

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In 2017, more than half the cases of typhoid fever worldwide were projected to have occurred in India. In the absence of contemporary population-based data, it is unclear whether declining trends of hospitalization for typhoid in India reflect increased antibiotic treatment or a true reduction in infection. METHODS: From 2017 through 2020, we conducted weekly surveillance for acute febrile illness and measured the incidence of typhoid fever (as confirmed on blood culture) in a prospective cohort of children between the ages of 6 months and 14 years at three urban sites and one rural site in India. At an additional urban site and five rural sites, we combined blood-culture testing of hospitalized patients who had a fever with survey data regarding health care use to estimate incidence in the community. RESULTS: A total of 24,062 children who were enrolled in four cohorts contributed 46,959 child-years of observation. Among these children, 299 culture-confirmed typhoid cases were recorded, with an incidence per 100,000 child-years of 576 to 1173 cases in urban sites and 35 in rural Pune. The estimated incidence of typhoid fever from hospital surveillance ranged from 12 to 1622 cases per 100,000 child-years among children between the ages of 6 months and 14 years and from 108 to 970 cases per 100,000 person-years among those who were 15 years of age or older. Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi was isolated from 33 children, for an overall incidence of 68 cases per 100,000 child-years after adjustment for age. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of typhoid fever in urban India remains high, with generally lower estimates of incidence in most rural areas. (Funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; NSSEFI Clinical Trials Registry of India number, CTRI/2017/09/009719; ISRCTN registry number, ISRCTN72938224.).


Asunto(s)
Fiebre Paratifoidea , Fiebre Tifoidea , Humanos , Lactante , Incidencia , India/epidemiología , Fiebre Paratifoidea/diagnóstico , Fiebre Paratifoidea/epidemiología , Vigilancia de la Población , Estudios Prospectivos , Fiebre Tifoidea/diagnóstico , Fiebre Tifoidea/epidemiología , Costo de Enfermedad , Cultivo de Sangre , Preescolar , Niño , Adolescente , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos
3.
Nature ; 581(7806): 94-99, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32376956

RESUMEN

Vaccines may reduce the burden of antimicrobial resistance, in part by preventing infections for which treatment often includes the use of antibiotics1-4. However, the effects of vaccination on antibiotic consumption remain poorly understood-especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where the burden of antimicrobial resistance is greatest5. Here we show that vaccines that have recently been implemented in the World Health Organization's Expanded Programme on Immunization reduce antibiotic consumption substantially among children under five years of age in LMICs. By analysing data from large-scale studies of households, we estimate that pneumococcal conjugate vaccines and live attenuated rotavirus vaccines confer 19.7% (95% confidence interval, 3.4-43.4%) and 11.4% (4.0-18.6%) protection against antibiotic-treated episodes of acute respiratory infection and diarrhoea, respectively, in age groups that experience the greatest disease burden attributable to the vaccine-targeted pathogens6,7. Under current coverage levels, pneumococcal and rotavirus vaccines prevent 23.8 million and 13.6 million episodes of antibiotic-treated illness, respectively, among children under five years of age in LMICs each year. Direct protection resulting from the achievement of universal coverage targets for these vaccines could prevent an additional 40.0 million episodes of antibiotic-treated illness. This evidence supports the prioritization of vaccines within the global strategy to combat antimicrobial resistance8.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Países en Desarrollo/economía , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunas , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/economía , Preescolar , Diarrea/tratamiento farmacológico , Diarrea/prevención & control , Diarrea/virología , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana , Utilización de Medicamentos/economía , Humanos , Incidencia , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Neumococicas/inmunología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/microbiología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Rotavirus/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra Rotavirus/inmunología , Vacunas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas/economía , Vacunas/inmunología , Organización Mundial de la Salud/organización & administración
4.
Clin Infect Dis ; 78(4): 976-982, 2024 Apr 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37738564

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Widespread outbreaks of person-to-person transmitted hepatitis A virus (HAV), particularly among people who inject drugs (PWID), continue across the United States and globally. However, the herd immunity threshold and vaccination coverage required to prevent outbreaks are unknown. We used surveillance data and dynamic modeling to estimate herd immunity thresholds among PWID in 16 US states. METHODS: We used a previously published dynamic model of HAV transmission calibrated to surveillance data from outbreaks involving PWID in 16 states. Using state-level calibrated models, we estimated the basic reproduction number (R0) and herd immunity threshold for PWID in each state. We performed a meta-analysis of herd immunity thresholds to determine the critical vaccination coverage required to prevent most HAV outbreaks among PWID. RESULTS: Estimates of R0 for HAV infection ranged from 2.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-2.5) for North Carolina to 5.0 (95% CI, 4.5-5.6) for West Virginia. Corresponding herd immunity thresholds ranged from 55% (95% CI, 47%-61%) for North Carolina to 80% (95% CI, 78%-82%) for West Virginia. Based on the meta-analysis, we estimated a pooled herd immunity threshold of 64% (95% CI, 61%-68%; 90% prediction interval, 52%-76%) among PWID. Using the prediction interval upper bound (76%) and assuming 95% vaccine efficacy, we estimated that vaccination coverage of 80% could prevent most HAV outbreaks. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatitis A vaccination programs in the United States may need to achieve vaccination coverage of at least 80% among PWID in order to prevent most HAV outbreaks among this population.


Asunto(s)
Consumidores de Drogas , Virus de la Hepatitis A , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Inmunidad Colectiva , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/complicaciones , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/epidemiología , Vacunación
5.
Nature ; 619(7971): 703-704, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37438627
6.
Clin Infect Dis ; 76(8): 1496-1499, 2023 04 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36433715

RESUMEN

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) defines a county metric of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) community levels to inform public health measures. We find that the COVID-19 community levels vary frequently over time, which may not be optimal for decision making. Alternative metric formulations that do not compromise predictive ability are shown to reduce variability.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Salud Pública , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.
7.
Clin Infect Dis ; 77(11): 1544-1551, 2023 11 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37542465

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although tuberculosis disease is a leading cause of global childhood mortality, there remain major gaps in diagnosis, treatment, and prevention in children because tuberculosis control programs rely predominantly on presentation of symptomatic children or contact tracing. We assessed the public health impact and cost-effectiveness of age-based routine screening and contact tracing in children in South Africa. METHODS: We used a deterministic mathematical model to evaluate age-based routine screening in 1-year increments from ages 0 to 5 years, with and without contact tracing and preventive treatment. Screening incorporated symptom history and tuberculin skin testing, with chest x-ray and GeneXpert Ultra for confirmatory testing. We projected tuberculosis cases, deaths, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), and costs (in 2021 U.S. dollars) and evaluated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios comparing each intervention. RESULTS: Routine screening at age 2 years with contact tracing and preventive treatment averted 11 900 tuberculosis cases (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6160-15 730), 1360 deaths (95% CI: 260-3800), and 40 000 DALYs (95% CI: 13 000-100 000) in the South Africa pediatric population over 1 year compared with the status quo. This combined strategy was cost-effective (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio $9050 per DALY; 95% CI: 2890-22 920) and remained cost-effective above an annual risk of infection of 1.6%. For annual risk of infection between 0.8% and 1.6%, routine screening at age 2 years was the dominant strategy. CONCLUSIONS: Routine screening for tuberculosis among young children combined with contact tracing and preventive treatment would have a large public health impact and be cost-effective in preventing pediatric tuberculosis deaths in high-incidence settings such as South Africa.


Asunto(s)
Salud Pública , Tuberculosis , Niño , Humanos , Preescolar , Lactante , Sudáfrica/epidemiología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Tuberculosis/diagnóstico , Tuberculosis/epidemiología , Tuberculosis/prevención & control , Modelos Teóricos
8.
J Infect Dis ; 224(Supple 5): S612-S624, 2021 11 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35238367

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Typhoid fever causes substantial global mortality, with almost half occurring in India. New typhoid vaccines are highly effective and recommended by the World Health Organization for high-burden settings. There is a need to determine whether and which typhoid vaccine strategies should be implemented in India. METHODS: We assessed typhoid vaccination using a dynamic compartmental model, parameterized by and calibrated to disease and costing data from a recent multisite surveillance study in India. We modeled routine and 1-time campaign strategies that target different ages and settings. The primary outcome was cost-effectiveness, measured by incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) benchmarked against India's gross national income per capita (US$2130). RESULTS: Both routine and campaign vaccination strategies were cost-saving compared to the status quo, due to averted costs of illness. The preferred strategy was a nationwide community-based catchup campaign targeting children aged 1-15 years alongside routine vaccination, with an ICER of $929 per disability-adjusted life-year averted. Over the first 10 years of implementation, vaccination could avert 21-39 million cases and save $1.6-$2.2 billion. These findings were broadly consistent across willingness-to-pay thresholds, epidemiologic settings, and model input distributions. CONCLUSIONS: Despite high initial costs, routine and campaign typhoid vaccination in India could substantially reduce mortality and was highly cost-effective.


Asunto(s)
Fiebre Tifoidea , Vacunas Tifoides-Paratifoides , Niño , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Programas de Inmunización , India/epidemiología , Fiebre Tifoidea/epidemiología , Fiebre Tifoidea/prevención & control , Vacunación , Vacunas Conjugadas
9.
J Infect Dis ; 224(224 Supple 5): S475-S483, 2021 11 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35238365

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Typhoid fever remains a major public health problem in India. Recently, the Surveillance for Enteric Fever in India program completed a multisite surveillance study. However, data on subnational variation in typhoid fever are needed to guide the introduction of the new typhoid conjugate vaccine in India. METHODS: We applied a geospatial statistical model to estimate typhoid fever incidence across India, using data from 4 cohort studies and 6 hybrid surveillance sites from October 2017 to March 2020. We collected geocoded data from the Demographic and Health Survey in India as predictors of typhoid fever incidence. We used a log linear regression model to predict a primary outcome of typhoid incidence. RESULTS: We estimated a national incidence of typhoid fever in India of 360 cases (95% confidence interval [CI], 297-494) per 100 000 person-years, with an annual estimate of 4.5 million cases (95% CI, 3.7-6.1 million) and 8930 deaths (95% CI, 7360-12 260), assuming a 0.2% case-fatality rate. We found substantial geographic variation of typhoid incidence across the country, with higher incidence in southwestern states and urban centers in the north. CONCLUSIONS: There is a large burden of typhoid fever in India with substantial heterogeneity across the country, with higher burden in urban centers.


Asunto(s)
Fiebre Tifoidea , Vacunas Tifoides-Paratifoides , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Incidencia , India/epidemiología , Salmonella typhi , Fiebre Tifoidea/epidemiología , Fiebre Tifoidea/prevención & control
10.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(9): e3127-e3129, 2021 11 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33570097

RESUMEN

Routine asymptomatic testing strategies for COVID-19 have been proposed to prevent outbreaks in high-risk healthcare environments. We used simulation modeling to evaluate the optimal frequency of viral testing. We found that routine testing substantially reduces risk of outbreaks, but may need to be as frequent as twice weekly.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Atención a la Salud , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Instituciones de Salud , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2
12.
BMC Med ; 19(1): 116, 2021 05 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33962621

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 outbreaks have occurred in homeless shelters across the US, highlighting an urgent need to identify the most effective infection control strategy to prevent future outbreaks. METHODS: We developed a microsimulation model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in a homeless shelter and calibrated it to data from cross-sectional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) surveys conducted during COVID-19 outbreaks in five homeless shelters in three US cities from March 28 to April 10, 2020. We estimated the probability of averting a COVID-19 outbreak when an exposed individual is introduced into a representative homeless shelter of 250 residents and 50 staff over 30 days under different infection control strategies, including daily symptom-based screening, twice-weekly PCR testing, and universal mask wearing. RESULTS: The proportion of PCR-positive residents and staff at the shelters with observed outbreaks ranged from 2.6 to 51.6%, which translated to the basic reproduction number (R0) estimates of 2.9-6.2. With moderate community incidence (~ 30 confirmed cases/1,000,000 people/day), the estimated probabilities of averting an outbreak in a low-risk (R0 = 1.5), moderate-risk (R0 = 2.9), and high-risk (R0 = 6.2) shelter were respectively 0.35, 0.13, and 0.04 for daily symptom-based screening; 0.53, 0.20, and 0.09 for twice-weekly PCR testing; 0.62, 0.27, and 0.08 for universal masking; and 0.74, 0.42, and 0.19 for these strategies in combination. The probability of averting an outbreak diminished with higher transmissibility (R0) within the simulated shelter and increasing incidence in the local community. CONCLUSIONS: In high-risk homeless shelter environments and locations with high community incidence of COVID-19, even intensive infection control strategies (incorporating daily symptom screening, frequent PCR testing, and universal mask wearing) are unlikely to prevent outbreaks, suggesting a need for non-congregate housing arrangements for people experiencing homelessness. In lower-risk environments, combined interventions should be employed to reduce outbreak risk.


Asunto(s)
Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19/métodos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Simulación por Computador , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Personas con Mala Vivienda , Control de Infecciones/métodos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19/estadística & datos numéricos , Ciudades/epidemiología , Ciudades/estadística & datos numéricos , Simulación por Computador/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Brotes de Enfermedades/estadística & datos numéricos , Personas con Mala Vivienda/estadística & datos numéricos , Vivienda/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
13.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 115(4): E584-E591, 2018 01 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29301964

RESUMEN

Schistosomiasis is a parasitic disease that affects over 240 million people globally. To improve population-level disease control, there is growing interest in adding chemical-based snail control interventions to interrupt the lifecycle of Schistosoma in its snail host to reduce parasite transmission. However, this approach is not widely implemented, and given environmental concerns, the optimal conditions for when snail control is appropriate are unclear. We assessed the potential impact and cost-effectiveness of various snail control strategies. We extended previously published dynamic, age-structured transmission and cost-effectiveness models to simulate mass drug administration (MDA) and focal snail control interventions against Schistosoma haematobium across a range of low-prevalence (5-20%) and high-prevalence (25-50%) rural Kenyan communities. We simulated strategies over a 10-year period of MDA targeting school children or entire communities, snail control, and combined strategies. We measured incremental cost-effectiveness in 2016 US dollars per disability-adjusted life year and defined a strategy as optimally cost-effective when maximizing health gains (averted disability-adjusted life years) with an incremental cost-effectiveness below a Kenya-specific economic threshold. In both low- and high-prevalence settings, community-wide MDA with additional snail control reduced total disability by an additional 40% compared with school-based MDA alone. The optimally cost-effective scenario included the addition of snail control to MDA in over 95% of simulations. These results support inclusion of snail control in global guidelines and national schistosomiasis control strategies for optimal disease control, especially in settings with high prevalence, "hot spots" of transmission, and noncompliance to MDA.


Asunto(s)
Modelos Económicos , Esquistosomiasis/prevención & control , Caracoles , Animales , Simulación por Computador , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Kenia , Esquistosomiasis/economía , Esquistosomiasis/transmisión
14.
BMC Med ; 18(1): 218, 2020 07 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32664927

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: School closures have been enacted as a measure of mitigation during the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. It has been shown that school closures could cause absenteeism among healthcare workers with dependent children, but there remains a need for spatially granular analyses of the relationship between school closures and healthcare worker absenteeism to inform local community preparedness. METHODS: We provide national- and county-level simulations of school closures and unmet child care needs across the USA. We develop individual simulations using county-level demographic and occupational data, and model school closure effectiveness with age-structured compartmental models. We perform multivariate quasi-Poisson ecological regressions to find associations between unmet child care needs and COVID-19 vulnerability factors. RESULTS: At the national level, we estimate the projected rate of unmet child care needs for healthcare worker households to range from 7.4 to 8.7%, and the effectiveness of school closures as a 7.6% and 8.4% reduction in fewer hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) beds, respectively, at peak demand when varying across initial reproduction number estimates by state. At the county level, we find substantial variations of projected unmet child care needs and school closure effects, 9.5% (interquartile range (IQR) 8.2-10.9%) of healthcare worker households and 5.2% (IQR 4.1-6.5%) and 6.8% (IQR 4.8-8.8%) reduction in fewer hospital and ICU beds, respectively, at peak demand. We find significant positive associations between estimated levels of unmet child care needs and diabetes prevalence, county rurality, and race (p<0.05). We estimate costs of absenteeism and child care and observe from our models that an estimated 76.3 to 96.8% of counties would find it less expensive to provide child care to all healthcare workers with children than to bear the costs of healthcare worker absenteeism during school closures. CONCLUSIONS: School closures are projected to reduce peak ICU and hospital demand, but could disrupt healthcare systems through absenteeism, especially in counties that are already particularly vulnerable to COVID-19. Child care subsidies could help circumvent the ostensible trade-off between school closures and healthcare worker absenteeism.


Asunto(s)
Absentismo , Cuidado del Niño/economía , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Instituciones Académicas , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Niño , Simulación por Computador , Estudios de Factibilidad , Predicción , Geografía , Fuerza Laboral en Salud , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Evaluación de Necesidades , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
15.
PLoS Med ; 16(12): e1002994, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31869328

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Vaccine hesitancy, the reluctance or refusal to receive vaccination, is a growing public health problem in the United States and globally. State policies that eliminate nonmedical ("personal belief") exemptions to childhood vaccination requirements are controversial, and their effectiveness to improve vaccination coverage remains unclear given limited rigorous policy analysis. In 2016, a California policy (Senate Bill 277) eliminated nonmedical exemptions from school entry requirements. The objective of this study was to estimate the association between California's 2016 policy and changes in vaccine coverage. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We used a quasi-experimental state-level synthetic control analysis and a county-level difference-in-differences analysis to estimate the impact of the 2016 California policy on vaccination coverage and prevalence of exemptions to vaccine requirements (nonmedical and medical). We used publicly available state-level data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on coverage of measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccination, nonmedical exemption, and medical exemption in children entering kindergarten. We used county-level data individually requested from state departments of public health on overall vaccine coverage and exemptions. Based on data availability, we included state-level data for 45 states, including California, from 2011 to 2017 and county-level data for 17 states from 2010 to 2017. The prespecified primary study outcome was MMR vaccination in the state analysis and overall vaccine coverage in the county analysis. In the state-level synthetic control analysis, MMR coverage in California increased by 3.3% relative to its synthetic control in the postpolicy period (top 2 of 43 states evaluated in the placebo tests, top 5%), nonmedical exemptions decreased by 2.4% (top 2 of 43 states evaluated in the placebo tests, top 5%), and medical exemptions increased by 0.4% (top 1 of 44 states evaluated in the placebo tests, top 2%). In the county-level analysis, overall vaccination coverage increased by 4.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.9%-5.8%, p < 0.001), nonmedical exemptions decreased by 3.9% (95% CI 2.4%-5.4%, p < 0.001), and medical exemptions increased by 2.4% (95% CI 2.0%-2.9%, p < 0.001). Changes in vaccination coverage across counties after the policy implementation from 2015 to 2017 ranged from -6% to 26%, with larger increases in coverage in counties with lower prepolicy vaccine coverage. Results were robust to alternative model specifications. The limitations of the study were the exclusion of a subset of US states from the analysis and the use of only 2 years of postpolicy data based on data availability. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, implementation of the California policy that eliminated nonmedical childhood vaccine exemptions was associated with an estimated increase in vaccination coverage and a reduction in nonmedical exemptions at state and county levels. The observed increase in medical exemptions was offset by the larger reduction in nonmedical exemptions. The largest increases in vaccine coverage were observed in the most "high-risk" counties, meaning those with the lowest prepolicy vaccine coverage. Our findings suggest that government policies removing nonmedical exemptions can be effective at increasing vaccination coverage.


Asunto(s)
Política de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Formulación de Políticas , Cobertura de Vacunación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Vacunación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Vacunas/economía , California , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Sarampión/prevención & control , Salud Pública/legislación & jurisprudencia , Instituciones Académicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Vacunación/métodos
16.
J Infect Dis ; 218(suppl_4): S232-S242, 2018 11 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29444257

RESUMEN

Background: Typhoid fever remains a major public health problem globally. While new Vi conjugate vaccines hold promise for averting disease, the optimal programmatic delivery remains unclear. We aimed to identify the strategies and associated epidemiologic conditions under which Vi conjugate vaccines would be cost-effective. Methods: We developed a dynamic, age-structured transmission and cost-effectiveness model that simulated multiple vaccination strategies with a typhoid Vi conjugate vaccine from a societal perspective. We simulated 10-year vaccination programs with (1) routine immunization of infants (aged <1 year) through the Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) and (2) routine immunization of infants through the EPI plus a 1-time catch-up campaign in school-aged children (aged 5-14 years). In the base case analysis, we assumed a 0.5% case-fatality rate for all cases of clinically symptomatic typhoid fever and defined strategies as highly cost-effective by using the definition of a low-income country (defined as a country with a gross domestic product of $1045 per capita). We defined incidence as the true number of clinically symptomatic people in the population per year. Results: Vi conjugate typhoid vaccines were highly cost-effective when administered by routine immunization activities through the EPI in settings with an annual incidence of >50 cases/100000 (95% uncertainty interval, 40-75 cases) and when administered through the EPI plus a catch-up campaign in settings with an annual incidence of >130 cases/100000 (95% uncertainty interval, 50-395 cases). The incidence threshold was sensitive to the typhoid-related case-fatality rate, carrier contribution to transmission, vaccine characteristics, and country-specific economic threshold for cost-effectiveness. Conclusions: Typhoid Vi conjugate vaccines would be highly cost-effective in low-income countries in settings of moderate typhoid incidence (50 cases/100000 annually). These results were sensitive to case-fatality rates, underscoring the need to consider factors contributing to typhoid mortality (eg, healthcare access and antimicrobial resistance) in the global vaccination strategy.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Programas de Inmunización/economía , Modelos Biológicos , Fiebre Tifoidea/prevención & control , Vacunas Tifoides-Paratifoides/inmunología , Adolescente , Adulto , Envejecimiento , Niño , Preescolar , Simulación por Computador , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Vacunas Tifoides-Paratifoides/economía , Vacunación , Vacunas Conjugadas/inmunología , Adulto Joven
19.
J Biol Chem ; 288(46): 33118-23, 2013 Nov 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24097977

RESUMEN

Shiga toxin (Stx) produced by enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli causes diarrhea-associated hemolytic-uremic syndrome (DHUS), a severe renal thrombotic microangiopathy. We investigated the interaction between Stx and von Willebrand Factor (VWF), a multimeric plasma glycoprotein that mediates platelet adhesion, activation, and aggregation. Stx bound to ultra-large VWF (ULVWF) secreted from and anchored to stimulated human umbilical vein endothelial cells, as well as to immobilized VWF-rich human umbilical vein endothelial cell supernatant. This Stx binding was localized to the A1 and A2 domain of VWF monomeric subunits and reduced the rate of ADAMTS-13-mediated cleavage of the Tyr(1605)-Met(1606) peptide bond in the A2 domain. Stx-VWF interaction and the associated delay in ADAMTS-13-mediated cleavage of VWF may contribute to the pathophysiology of DHUS.


Asunto(s)
Células Endoteliales de la Vena Umbilical Humana/metabolismo , Toxina Shiga I/metabolismo , Factor de von Willebrand/metabolismo , Proteínas ADAM/metabolismo , Proteína ADAMTS13 , Escherichia coli Enterohemorrágica/metabolismo , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/metabolismo , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/patología , Femenino , Síndrome Hemolítico-Urémico/metabolismo , Síndrome Hemolítico-Urémico/patología , Células Endoteliales de la Vena Umbilical Humana/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Unión Proteica , Estructura Terciaria de Proteína
20.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 1883, 2024 Mar 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38448400

RESUMEN

There is a public health need to understand how different frequencies of COVID-19 booster vaccines may mitigate the risk of severe COVID-19, while accounting for waning of protection and differential risk by age and immune status. By analyzing United States COVID-19 surveillance and seroprevalence data in a microsimulation model, here we show that more frequent COVID-19 booster vaccination (every 6-12 months) in older age groups and the immunocompromised population would effectively reduce the burden of severe COVID-19, while frequent boosters in the younger population may only provide modest benefit against severe disease. In persons 75+ years, the model estimated that annual boosters would reduce absolute annual risk of severe COVID-19 by 199 (uncertainty interval: 183-232) cases per 100,000 persons, compared to a one-time booster vaccination. In contrast, for persons 18-49 years, the model estimated that annual boosters would reduce this risk by 14 (10-19) cases per 100,000 persons. Those with prior infection had lower benefit of more frequent boosting, and immunocompromised persons had larger benefit. Scenarios with emerging variants with immune evasion increased the benefit of more frequent variant-targeted boosters. This study underscores the benefit of considering key risk factors to inform frequency of COVID-19 booster vaccines in public health guidance and ensuring at least annual boosters in high-risk populations.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Anciano , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Factores de Riesgo , Vacunación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA