Association between foetal sex and adverse neonatal outcomes in women with gestational diabetes.

AIMS: Foetal male sex is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. However, studies evaluating the impact of foetal sex on perinatal outcomes in women with gestational diabetes (GDM) are scarce. We studied whether male new-born sex is associated with neonatal outcomes, in women with GDM. METHODS: This is a retrospective study based on the national Portuguese register of GDM. All women with live-born singleton pregnancies between 2012 and 2017 were eligible for study inclusion. Primary endpoints under analysis were neonatal hypoglycaemia, neonatal macrosomia, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. We excluded women with missing data on the primary endpoint. Pregnancy data and neonatal outcomes between female and male new-borns were compared. Multivariate logistic regression models were built. RESULTS: We studied 10,768 new-borns in mothers with GDM, 5635 (52.3%) male, 438 (4.1%) had neonatal hypoglycaemia, 406 (3.8%) were macrosomic, 671 (6.2%) had RDS, and 671 (6.2%) needed NICU admission. Male new-borns were more frequently small or large for gestational age. No differences were observed on maternal age, body mass index, glycated haemoglobin, anti-hyperglycaemic treatment, pregnancy complications or gestational age at delivery. In the multivariate regression analysis, male sex was independently associated with neonatal hypoglycaemia [OR 1.26 (IC 95%: 1.04-1.54), p = 0.02], neonatal macrosomia [1.94 (1.56-2.41), p < 0.001], NICU admission [1.29 (1.07-1.56), p = 0.009], and RDS [1.35 (1.05-1.73, p = 0.02]. CONCLUSIONS: Male new-borns have an independent 26% higher risk of neonatal hypoglycaemia, 29% higher risk of NICU admission, 35% higher risk of RDS, and almost twofold higher risk of macrosomia, compared to female new-borns.

Unknown rheumatic cardiac disease as cause of acute onset post-partum dyspnea: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Acute post-partum dyspnea configures an obstetric challenge with multiple differential diagnosis. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of a previous healthy woman with preeclampsia who developed severe dyspnea 30 h after delivery. She complained of cough, orthopnea, and bilateral lower extremities oedema. She denied headaches, blurry vision, nausea, vomiting, fever or chills. Auscultation revealed a diastolic murmur, and was compatible with pulmonary oedema. A timely bedside echocardiogram showed moderate dilated left atrium with severe mitral insufficiency suggestive of an unknown rheumatic disease. She was managed with noninvasive ventilation, loop diuretics, vasodilators, thromboprophylaxis, head-end elevation, and fluid restriction with progressive improving. CONCLUSIONS: Hemodynamic changes in pregnant patients with previously silent cardiac disease may pose a challenge and cause post-partum dyspnea. This scenario requires a timely and multidisciplinary approach.

Maternal height as a predictor of glucose intolerance in the postpartum and its relationship with maternal pre-gestational weight.

PURPOSE: Short stature predicts higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes. We studied the association between height and glucose intolerance in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and whether this association differed according to body mass index (BMI). METHODS: Retrospective study of the Portuguese GDM registry. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: missing data on postpartum oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) or BMI. ENDPOINT: postpartum glucose intolerance (diabetes mellitus or prediabetes on the 6-8 weeks postpartum OGTT). Women were divided by mean height and compared. A multivariate logistic regression was used, and the analysis was stratified by BMI (cut-off: 30 kg/m2) and interaction was tested. RESULTS: We included 7402 women; mean height was 161.9 ± 6.2 cm. Taller women had lower BMI and lower rates of glucose intolerance (6.8 vs. 8.8%, p = 0.002). Women with BMI < 30 kg/m2 were taller than those with obesity. Height associated with glucose intolerance. The multivariate adjusted OR of glucose intolerance was 0.98 (95% CI 0.96-0.99), p = 0.001, per 1 cm increase in height. This association was only observed in women with BMI < 30 kg/m2: OR 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-0.99), < 0.001. There was no such association in women with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2: OR 0.99 (95% CI 0.97-1.02), p = 0.65. P for interaction between BMI and height was 0.09. CONCLUSIONS: In non-obese pre-gestational women, height is inversely associated with postpartum glucose intolerance. Per 1 cm increase in height, women present a 3% decrease in the risk of developing diabetes mellitus or prediabetes.

First trimester fasting glucose and glycated haemoglobin cut-offs associated with abnormal glucose homeostasis in the post-partum reclassification in women with hyperglycaemia in pregnancy.

Hyperglycaemia first detected during pregnancy is either gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) or previous undiagnosed diabetes. We aimed to study if there were a first trimester fasting glycaemia (FTG) and a glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) cut-off values associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) or abnormal glucose homeostasis (AGH) at the post-partum oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) reclassification. We retrospectively studied a group of pregnant women from the Portuguese National Registry of GDM. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the best FTG and HbA1c cut-offs to predict T2DM and AGH. We studied 4068 women. The area under the ROC curves (AUC) for the association with T2DM was 0.85 (0.80-0.90) for FTG and 0.85 (0.80-0.91) for HbA1c. The best FTG cut-off for association with T2DM was 99 mg/dL: sensitivity 77.4%, specificity 74.3%, positive predictive value (PPV) 4.8%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 99.5%. The best HbA1c cut-off for association with T2DM was 5.4%: sensitivity 79.0%, specificity 80.1%, PPV 5.7%, and NPV 99.6%. The AUC for the association of FTG and HbA1c with AGH were 0.73 (0.70-0.76) and 0.71 (0.67-0.74), respectively. The best FTG cut-off for predicting AGH was 99 mg/dL: sensitivity 59.4%, specificity 76.2%, PPV 17.0%, and NPV 95.8%. The best HbA1c cut-off was 5.4%: sensitivity 48.7%, specificity 81.5%, PPV 17.8%, and NPV 95.1%. We suggest an FTG of 99 mg/dL and an HbA1c of 5.4% as the best cut-offs below which T2DM is unlikely to be present. Almost all patients with FTG < 99 mg/dL and HbA1c < 5.4% did not reclassify as T2DM. These early pregnancy cut-offs might alert the physician for the possibility of a previous undiagnosed diabetes and alert them to the importance of testing for it after delivery.

Polymorphic eruption of pregnancy: Review of literature.

Polymorphic Eruption of Pregnancy (PEP) is one of the most common dermatosis related to pregnancy. PEP usually consists of pruritic papules and plaques appearing in the third trimester of pregnancy. It is more common in primigravidae and twin pregnancies. Although not associated with poorer foetal or maternal outcomes, it may be hard for pregnant women to endure. The diagnosis is easy if suspected, though sometimes it may be hard to distinguish from other dermatosis such as atopic eczema of pregnancy, pemphigoid gestationis or dermatitis. Topical treatment with emollients and low-medium potency steroids is usually effective but systemic steroid treatment may be required. PEP is self-limiting and resolves days or weeks after the first appearance or after delivery. In this article, the authors aim to review the literature published from 2000 onwards regarding the subject, either in English or Portuguese.

Development and internal validation of a clinical score to predict neonatal hypoglycaemia in women with gestational diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: Gestational diabetes (GD) is a risk factor for neonatal hypoglycaemia (NH), but other factors can increase this risk. OBJECTIVES: To create a score to predict NH in women with GD. METHODS: Retrospective study of women with GD with a live singleton birth between 2012 and 2017 from the Portuguese GD registry. Pregnancies with and without NH were compared. A logistic regression was used to study NH predictors. Variables independently associated with NH were used to score derivation. The model's internal validation was performed by a bootstrapping. The association between the score and NH was assessed by logistic regression. RESULTS: We studied 10216 pregnancies, 410 (4.0%) with NH. The model's AUC was 0.628 (95%CI: 0.599-0.657). Optimism-corrected c-index: 0.626. Points were assigned to variables associated with NH in proportion to the model's lowest regression coefficient: insulin-treatment 1, preeclampsia 3, preterm delivery 2, male sex 1, and small-for-gestational-age 2, or large-for-gestational-age 3. NH prevalence by score category 0-1, 2, 3, 4, and ≥5 was 2.3%, 3.0%, 4.5%, 6.0%, 7.4%, and 11.5%, respectively. Per point, the OR for NH was 1.35 (95% CI: 1.27-1.42). A score of 2, 3, 4, 5 or ≥6 (versus ≤1) had a OR for NH of 1.67 (1.29-2.15), 2.24 (1.65-3.04), 2.83 (2.02-3.98), 3.08 (1.83-5.16), and 6.84 (4.34-10.77), respectively. CONCLUSION: Per each score point, women with GD had 35% higher risk of NH. Those with ≥6 points had 6.8-fold higher risk of NH compared to a score ≤1. Our score may be useful for identifying women at a higher risk of NH.

Metformin combined with insulin in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a propensity score-matched study.

AIM: Metformin use in gestational diabetes (GDM) is a common practice. Although its use in combination with insulin might be advantageous, it was never formally tested. We studied whether combined treatment was associated with better obstetric or neonatal outcomes compared to insulin alone. METHODS: This is a retrospective study, using the Portuguese National Registry of GDM (2012-2017), of women treated with insulin ± metformin. Primary endpoints were obstetric and neonatal complications. Secondary endpoints were gestational weight gain (GWG) and insulin dose. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to balance the distribution of age, BMI, insulin treatment duration, HbA1c, first trimester diagnosis of GDM and previous GDM or macrosomia. Women treated with metformin plus insulin and insulin only were then compared. RESULTS: A total of 4034 women were treated with insulin or insulin plus metformin (10.2%). After propensity score matching, we studied two groups of 386 patients. Obstetric and neonatal complications were similar. Women treated with metformin plus insulin had 201 (52.1%) obstetric complications versus 184 (47.7%) in insulin-only group, p = 0.22; and 112 (29.0%) neonatal complications versus 96 (24.9%), p = 0.19. Patients treated with metformin plus insulin had similar GWG, excessive weight gain and insulin dose compared to the insulin-only group. CONCLUSIONS: Women with GDM treated with insulin plus metformin had similar obstetric and neonatal complications, weight gained and insulin dose compared to those only treated with insulin.

Febrile Neutropenia following Parvovirus B19 Infection and Cross Anti-Kell Reaction to E. Coli in Pregnancy.

Parvovirus B19 has tropism for red line blood cells, causing immune hydrops during pregnancy. A positive anti-Kell Coombs reaction usually happens during pregnancy when there is production of antibodies that target Kell antigens, but cross reactions to other antigens may occur. A 24-year-old Gypsy primigravida, 0 Rhesus positive, presented with persistent isolated hyperthermia for 2 weeks and a positive indirect Coombs test result with anti-Kell antibodies at routine tests. She had a 19-week live fetus. The blood tests revealed bicytopenia with iron deficiency anemia, leucopoenia with neutropenia, and elevated C-reactive protein. She was medicated with imipenem, and had a slow clinical recovery. Blood, urine and sputum samples were taken to perform cultures and to exclude other systemic infections. Escherichia coli was isolated in the urine, which most probably caused a transient cross anti-Kell reaction. Haemophilus influenza in the sputum and seroconversion to parvovirus B19 was confirmed, causing unusual deficits in the white cells, culminating in febrile neutropenia. Despite the patient's lack of compliance to the medical care, both maternal and fetal/neonatal outcomes were good. This a rare case report of 2 rare phenomena, a cross anti-Kell reaction to E. coli and parvovirus B19 infection with tropism for white cells causing febrile neutropenia, both events occurring simultaneously during pregnancy.

O parvovírus B19 tem tropismo para as células sanguíneas da linha vermelha, causando hidropsia imune durante a gravidez. O teste Coombs anti-Kell positivo ocorre durante a gravidez quando há produção de anticorpos contra os antígenos de Kell, mas pode haver reações cruzadas para outros antígenos. Uma grávida primigesta de etnia cigana, de 24 anos, 0 Rhesus positivo, recorreu ao hospital às 19 semanas de gestação por hipertermia isolada persistente por 2 semanas e um teste Coombs indireto positivo por anticorpos anti-Kell em testes de rotina da gravidez. O estudo analítico revelou bicitopenia com anemia ferropênica, leucopenia com neutropenia, e elevação da proteína C-reativa. A paciente foi medicada com imipenem, e teve uma recuperação clínica lenta. Foram colhidas amostras de sangue, urina e expectoração para culturas bacterianas. Na urina, foi isolada Escherichia coli, o que provavelmente causou a reação anti-Kell cruzada transitória. Na expectoração, foi isolada Haemophilus influenza, e foi confirmada seroconversão para o parvovírus B19, que causou um déficit incomum na linhagem sanguínea branca, culminando com neutropenia febril. Apesar da má adesão aos cuidados médicos, os desfechos materno e fetal/neonatal foram bons. Este é um caso de 2 fenômenos raros, uma reação cruzada anti-Kell à infecção por E. coli, e parvovírus B19 com tropismo para células brancas causando neutropenia febril, ambos ocorrendo simultaneamente durante a gravidez.

[Assessment of Urinary Incontinence in Pregnancy and Postpartum: Observational Study]. / Avaliação da Incontinência Urinária na Gravidez e no Pós-Parto: Estudo Observacional.

INTRODUCTION: The urinary incontinence can affect up to 50% of women at some stage of their lives, particularly during pregnancy and postpartum. This study was designed in order to identify and assess the prevalence and risk factors for urinary incontinence during the third trimester of pregnancy and three months postpartum. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational and cross-sectional study. The population of the study was composed of 268 women who delivered and were admitted to the Centro Hospitalar Tâmega e Sousa in the years 2013 and 2014, and who agreed to participate in this study. Postpartum women were asked to fill out a questionnaire adapted from the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form, for urinary incontinence research in the third trimester of pregnancy. Three months after delivery, they were contacted by telephone and asked to answer the same questions about the urinary incontinence postpartum. RESULTS: Of the 268 women interviewed, 31 were excluded from the study, taking into account the defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. In total (n = 237), 51.89% of women included in the study, reported the occurrence of urinary incontinence during pregnancy. The prevalence of urinary incontinence in pregnancy by parity (primiparous versus multiparous) was statistically significant (p = 0.006). At postpartum (n = 237), 28.69% of women with urinary incontinence had vaginal delivery and 5.91% of women underwent cesarean delivery (p = 0.001). In these group of women with postpartum urinary incontinence (n = 82), 31.69% have had urinary incontinence only in the postpartum and 68.31% of women have had symptoms during pregnancy (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates the high prevalence of urinary incontinence in pregnancy and the respective decrease in postpartum. CONCLUSION: Multiparity and occurrence of urinary incontinence in pregnancy appear as potential risk factors in the emergence of the urinary incontinence.

Introdução: A incontinência urinária pode afetar até 50% das mulheres em alguma fase das suas vidas, nomeadamente durante a gravidez. Este estudo foi desenhado com a finalidade de identificar e avaliar a prevalência e fatores de risco para incontinência urinária durante o terceiro trimestre da gravidez e três meses após o parto. Material e Métodos: Estudo observacional e transversal. A população do estudo incluiu 268 puérperas, que tiveram parto no Centro Hospitalar Tâmega e Sousa, em 2013 e 2014. Foram avaliadas durante o período de internamento após o parto. As parturientes foram convidadas a preencher um questionário adaptado, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form, para investigação da incontinência urinária no terceiro trimestre da gravidez, para o qual deram consentimento. Três meses após o parto, foram contactadas telefonicamente e convidadas a responder às mesmas questões acerca da incontinência urinária no pós-parto. Resultados: Das 268 mulheres entrevistadas, 31 foram excluídas do estudo, tendo em conta os critérios de inclusão e exclusão definidos. No total (n = 237), 51,89% das mulheres incluídas no estudo, relataram a ocorrência de incontinência urinária durante a gravidez. A prevalência da incontinência urinária na gravidez, segundo a paridade (primíparas versus multíparas), foi estatisticamente significativa (p = 0,006). No pós-parto (n = 237), 28,69% das mulheres com incontinência urinária tiveram parto vaginal e 5,91% das mulheres foram submetidas a cesariana (p = 0,001). Neste grupo de mulheres com incontinência urinária pós-parto (n = 82), 31,69% apresentaram incontinência urinária de novo e 68,31% das mulheres já apresentavam sintomatologia durante a gravidez (p < 0,001). Discussão: Este estudo demonstra a elevada prevalência da incontinência urinária na gravidez e a respetiva redução no pós-parto. Conclusão: A multiparidade e a ocorrência de incontinência urinária na gravidez surgem como possíveis fatores de risco no aparecimento da incontinência urinária.

Febrile neutropenia following parvovirus B19 infection and cross anti-kell reaction to E. coli in pregnancy / Infeção por parvovírus B19 causando neutropenia febril e reação cruzada anti-Kell com E. coli na gravidez

Abstract Parvovirus B19 has tropism for red line blood cells, causing immune hydrops during pregnancy. A positive anti-Kell Coombs reaction usually happens during pregnancy when there is production of antibodies that target Kell antigens, but cross reactions to other antigens may occur. A 24-year-old Gypsy primigravida, 0 Rhesus positive, presented with persistent isolated hyperthermia for 2 weeks and a positive indirect Coombs test result with anti-Kell antibodies at routine tests. She had a 19-week live fetus. The blood tests revealed bicytopenia with iron deficiency anemia, leucopoenia with neutropenia, and elevated C-reactive protein. She was medicated with imipenem, and had a slow clinical recovery. Blood, urine and sputum samples were taken to perform cultures and to exclude other systemic infections. Escherichia coli was isolated in the urine, which most probably caused a transient cross anti-Kell reaction. Haemophilus influenza in the sputum and seroconversion to parvovirus B19 was confirmed, causing unusual deficits in the white cells, culminating in febrile neutropenia. Despite the patient's lack of compliance to the medical care, both maternal and fetal/neonatal outcomes were good. This a rare case report of 2 rare phenomena, a cross anti-Kell reaction to E. coli and parvovirus B19 infection with tropism for white cells causing febrile neutropenia, both events occurring simultaneously during pregnancy.

Resumo O parvovírus B19 tem tropismo para as células sanguíneas da linha vermelha, causando hidropsia imune durante a gravidez. O teste Coombs anti-Kell positivo ocorre durante a gravidez quando há produção de anticorpos contra os antígenos de Kell, mas pode haver reações cruzadas para outros antígenos. Uma grávida primigesta de etnia cigana, de 24 anos, 0 Rhesus positivo, recorreu ao hospital às 19 semanas de gestação por hipertermia isolada persistente por 2 semanas e umteste Coombs indireto positivo por anticorpos anti-Kell em testes de rotina da gravidez. O estudo analítico revelou bicitopenia com anemia ferropênica, leucopenia com neutropenia, e elevação da proteína C-reativa. A paciente foi medicada com imipenem, e teve uma recuperação clínica lenta. Foram colhidas amostras de sangue, urina e expectoração para culturas bacterianas. Na urina, foi isolada Escherichia coli, o que provavelmente causou a reação anti-Kell cruzada transitória. Na expectoração, foi isolada Haemophilus influenza, e foi confirmada seroconversão para o parvovírus B19, que causou um déficit incomum na linhagem sanguínea branca, culminando com neutropenia febril. Apesar da má adesão aos cuidados médicos, os desfechos materno e fetal/neonatal foram bons. Este é um caso de 2 fenômenos raros, uma reação cruzada anti-Kell à infecção por E. coli, e parvovírus B19 comtropismo para células brancas causando neutropenia febril, ambos ocorrendo simultaneamente durante a gravidez.