Stability over time of immature platelet fraction and comparison between EDTA and citrated whole blood samples.

BACKGROUND: Immature platelets (IP) are the youngest circulating platelets, released from megakaryocytes, and demonstrating increased dimensions, significant RNA content, and enhanced activity. Immature platelet research focuses on a differential diagnostic help in patients with thrombocytopenia. The objectives of this study were to compare the variability of IP in citrate and EDTA samples, and to determine stability over time. METHODS: Fifty-six patients were included for comparison between EDTA and citrate whole blood sample collection. Among the patients, 28 had thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 150G/L). Platelet measurement impedancemetry and fluorimetry were performed with Sysmex XN-9000. The immature platelet fraction (IPF) and absolute immature platelet count (A-IPC) were determined with a fluorescent method. RESULTS: The mean value of platelet count with fluorescence was, in EDTA sample, 215 ± 171 and, in citrate sample, 153 ± 118 G/L. No significant difference was observed between IPF between EDTA and citrate (7.74 ± 6.68% vs. 8.45 ± 7.37%, p = 0.69), respectively. With the Bland-Altman analysis, the mean difference in the EDTA sample, between 1 and 24 h, was 8.06 ± 6.96% and 8.73 ± 7.12% for IPF, whereas in the citrate sample, between 1 and 6 h, it was 8.60 ± 7.29% and 7.54 ± 6.97%, for IPF. Comparing 1 h EDTA sample with 6 h citrate sample, the variance ratio was 0.974 (95% CI: 0.864-1.084) in IPF. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed the potential to conduct IP measurements up to 24 h in the EDTA sample and IPF measurements in the citrate sample for up to 6 h. These results may be useful for the use of IPF, which is a promising parameter whose interest in clinical practice and standardization is not yet well defined.

Novel threshold value of midnight serum cortisol for diagnosis of hypercortisolism using the Roche Cortisol II assay.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of hypercortisolism requires multiple biochemical investigations, due to variations in cortisol production during the 24-hour circadian cycle. Midnight serum cortisol is difficult to interpret since the threshold value is dependent on the analytical method used and is often not provided by the manufacturer. Second-generation assays are more specific than first-generation assays and may have lower threshold values. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine a novel threshold value of midnight serum cortisol for the biochemical diagnosis of hypercortisolism, using the Roche Cobas Cortisol® second-generation assay. METHODS: This study was performed in adult patients hospitalized in the endocrinology unit of a university hospital. Patients had a complete assessment of their 24-hour cortisol cycle, i.e., a serum cortisol test every four hours and at least two first-line tests: late night salivary cortisol, dexamethasone suppression test and/or 24-hour urinary free cortisol. First-line tests were used to identify patients with hypercortisolism. Serum samples were analyzed by second-generation electrochemiluminescence immunoassays (ECLIA) from Roche Cobas Cortisol®. RESULTS: Midnight serum cortisol samples were obtained from 175 hospitalized patients. The novel threshold value obtained was 157 nmol/L with a sensitivity of 82.9% (68.6 to 94.3%) and a specificity of 90.0% (85.0 to 95.0%). CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that the threshold value of midnight serum cortisol is not comparable between first- and second-generation Roche Cobas Cortisol® assays and that the threshold value is lower with the second-generation assay.