Application of a Rat Liver Drug Bioactivation Transcriptional Response Assay Early in Drug Development That Informs Chemically Reactive Metabolite Formation and Potential for Drug-induced Liver Injury.

Drug-induced liver injury is a major reason for drug candidate attrition from development, denied commercialization, market withdrawal, and restricted prescribing of pharmaceuticals. The metabolic bioactivation of drugs to chemically reactive metabolites (CRMs) contribute to liver-associated adverse drug reactions in humans that often goes undetected in conventional animal toxicology studies. A challenge for pharmaceutical drug discovery has been reliably selecting drug candidates with a low liability of forming CRM and reduced drug-induced liver injury potential, at projected therapeutic doses, without falsely restricting the development of safe drugs. We have developed an in vivo rat liver transcriptional signature biomarker reflecting the cellular response to drug bioactivation. Measurement of transcriptional activation of integrated nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2)/Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (KEAP1) electrophilic stress, and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 1 (NRF1) proteasomal endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress responses, is described for discerning estimated clinical doses of drugs with potential for bioactivation-mediated hepatotoxicity. The approach was established using well benchmarked CRM forming test agents from our company. This was subsequently tested using curated lists of commercial drugs and internal compounds, anchored in the clinical experience with human hepatotoxicity, while agnostic to mechanism. Based on results with 116 compounds in short-term rat studies, with consideration of the maximum recommended daily clinical dose, this CRM mechanism-based approach yielded 32% sensitivity and 92% specificity for discriminating safe from hepatotoxic drugs. The approach adds new information for guiding early candidate selection and informs structure activity relationships (SAR) thus enabling lead optimization and mechanistic problem solving. Additional refinement of the model is ongoing. Case examples are provided describing the strengths and limitations of the approach.

Comparison of Deconvolution-Based and Absorption Modeling IVIVC for Extended Release Formulations of a BCS III Drug Development Candidate.

In vitro-in vivo correlations (IVIVC) are predictive mathematical models describing the relationship between dissolution and plasma concentration for a given drug compound. The traditional deconvolution/convolution-based approach is the most common methodology to establish a level A IVIVC that provides point to point relationship between the in vitro dissolution and the in vivo input rate. The increasing application of absorption physiologically based pharmacokinetic model (PBPK) has provided an alternative IVIVC approach. The current work established and compared two IVIVC models, via the traditional deconvolution/convolution method and via absorption PBPK modeling, for two types of modified release (MR) formulations (matrix and multi-particulate tablets) of MK-0941, a BCS III drug development candidate. Three batches with distinct release rates were studied for each formulation technology. A two-stage linear regression model was used for the deconvolution/convolution approach while optimization of the absorption scaling factors (a model parameter that relates permeability and input rate) in Gastroplus(TM) Advanced Compartmental Absorption and Transit model was used for the absorption PBPK approach. For both types of IVIVC models established, and for either the matrix or the multiparticulate formulations, the average absolute prediction errors for AUC and C max were below 10% and 15%, respectively. Both the traditional deconvolution/convolution-based and the absorption/PBPK-based level A IVIVC model adequately described the compound pharmacokinetics to guide future formulation development. This case study highlights the potential utility of absorption PBPK model to complement the traditional IVIVC approaches for MR products.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic-based decision making in the development of MK-0888, a VEGFR-2/FLT-3 kinase inhibitor.

PURPOSE: MK-0888 is an investigational VEGFR-2 inhibitor with demonstrated potent in vitro enzyme activity. Clinical investigation in healthy volunteers and cancer patients was undertaken to evaluate its pharmacokinetic properties and early safety profile. Early data were used to guide whether further clinical development was warranted. METHODS: Five phase I studies were conducted. Studies 1-4 were conducted in healthy male volunteers and examined safety and pharmacokinetics across a dose range of 0.5-100 mg. Single-dose and limited multiple-dose escalations were performed. Three formulations and food effect were assessed. Study 5 was a dose escalation study in cancer patients, evaluating pharmacokinetics and safety at doses of 6-100 mg administered up to twice daily. RESULTS: Safety: MK-0888 was generally well tolerated in healthy volunteers at single doses up to 100 mg and in cancer patients at doses up to 100 mg twice daily. Pharmacokinetics: After single-dose administration, MK-0888 was readily absorbed with a T(max) of 4-5 h and a half-life of 11.3-22.7 h. AUC, C(max), and C(24h) increased in a slightly less than dose proportional manner. With longer duration multiple-dose administration (2 weeks), trough concentrations decreased from Day 2 at doses of 50 mg twice daily and higher, suggestive of autoinduction of metabolism. The efficacious trough pharmacokinetic target was not attained at steady state. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetic behavior of MK-0888 does not support continued development. The early pharmacokinetic profile of the compound provides important information as to the probability of success of MK-0888 achieving efficacious exposures.

Clinical pharmacology profile of vorinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor.

PURPOSE: Vorinostat is a histone deacetylase inhibitor that has demonstrated preclinical activity in numerous cancer models. Clinical activity has been demonstrated in patients with a variety of malignancies. Vorinostat is presently indicated for the treatment of patients with advanced cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL). Clinical investigation is ongoing for therapy of other solid tumors and hematological malignancies either as monotherapy or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents. This review summarizes the pharmacokinetic properties of vorinostat. METHODS: Monotherapy pharmacokinetic data across a number of pharmacokinetic studies were reviewed, and data are presented. In addition, literature review was performed to obtain published Phase I and II pharmacokinetic combination therapy data to identify and characterize potential drug interactions with vorinostat. Pharmacokinetic data in special populations were also reviewed. RESULTS: The clinical pharmacology profile of vorinostat is favorable, exhibiting dose-proportional pharmacokinetics and modest food effect. There appear to be no major differences in the pharmacokinetics of vorinostat in special populations, including varying demographics and hepatic dysfunction. Combination therapy pharmacokinetic data indicate that vorinostat has a low propensity for drug interactions. CONCLUSIONS: Vorinostat's favorable clinical pharmacology and drug interaction profile aid in the ease of administration of vorinostat for the treatment of advanced CTCL and will be beneficial in continued assessment for other oncologic indications. Although a number of studies have been conducted to elucidate the detailed pharmacokinetic profile of vorinostat, more rigorous assessment of vorinostat pharmacokinetics, including clinical drug interaction studies, will be informative.

A 1-step Bayesian predictive approach for evaluating in vitro in vivo correlation (IVIVC).

IVIVC (in vitro in vivo correlation) methods may support approving a change in formulation of a drug using only in vitro dissolution data without additional bioequivalence trials in human subjects. Most current IVIVC methods express the in vivo plasma concentration of a drug formulation as a function of the cumulative in vivo absorption. The absorption is not directly observable, so is estimated by the cumulative dissolution of the drug formulation in in vitro dissolution trials. The calculations conventionally entail the complex and potentially unstable mathematical operations of convolution and deconvolution, or approximations aimed at omitting their need. This paper describes, and illustrates with data on a controlled-release formulation, a Bayesian approach to evaluating IVIVC that does not require convolution, deconvolution or approximation. This approach incorporates between- and within-subject (or replicate) variability without assuming asymptotic normality. The plasma concentration curve is expressed in terms of the in vitro dissolution percentage instead of time, recognizing that this correspondence may be noisy because of the various sources of error. All conventional functions of the concentration curve such as AUC, C(max) and T(max) can be expressed in terms of dissolution percentage, with uncertainties arising from variability in measuring absorption and dissolution accounted for explicitly.

Examination of the effect of increasing doses of etoricoxib on oral methotrexate pharmacokinetics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

The authors designed 2 randomized controlled studies to examine the effects of etoricoxib 60 to 120 mg daily on methotrexate pharmacokinetics in 50 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients on stable doses of methotrexate (7.5-20 mg). Patients received oral methotrexate at baseline and on days 7 and 14. In study 1, patients received etoricoxib 60 mg (days 1-7) and then 120 mg (days 8-14); in study 2, patients received etoricoxib 90 mg (days 1-7) and then 120 mg (days 8-14). For study 1, the AUC(0-infinity) geometric mean ratio (GMR) (90% confidence interval [CI]) for day 7 versus baseline was 1.01 (0.91, 1.12) for etoricoxib 60 mg; the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) GMR (90% CI) for day 14 was 1.28 (1.15, 1.42) for etoricoxib 120 mg. For study 2, the AUC(0-infinity) GMR (90% CI) for day 7 versus baseline was 1.07 (1.01, 1.13) for etoricoxib 90 mg; the AUC(0-infinity) GMR (90% CI) for day 14 was 1.05 (0.99, 1.11) for etoricoxib 120 mg. In summary, etoricoxib 60 and 90 mg had no effect on methotrexate plasma concentrations. Although no effect on methotrexate pharmacokinetics was observed with etoricoxib 120 mg in study 2, GMR AUC(0-infinity) fell outside the prespecified bounds in study 1. Standard monitoring of methotrexate-related toxicity should be continued when etoricoxib and methotrexate are administered concurrently, especially with doses >90 mg etoricoxib.

In vitro and in vivo properties of 3-tert-butyl-7-(5-methylisoxazol-3-yl)-2-(1-methyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-ylmethoxy)-pyrazolo[1,5-d]-[1,2,4]triazine (MRK-016), a GABAA receptor alpha5 subtype-selective inverse agonist.

3-tert-Butyl-7-(5-methylisoxazol-3-yl)-2-(1-methyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-ylmethoxy)-pyrazolo[1,5-d][1,2,4]triazine (MRK-016) is a pyrazolotriazine with an affinity of between 0.8 and 1.5 nM for the benzodiazepine binding site of native rat brain and recombinant human alpha1-, alpha2-, alpha3-, and alpha5-containing GABA(A) receptors. It has inverse agonist efficacy selective for the alpha5 subtype, and this alpha5 inverse agonism is greater than that of the prototypic alpha5-selective compound 3-(5-methylisoxazol-3-yl)-6-[(1-methyl-1,2,3-triazol-4-hdyl)methyloxy]-1,2,4-triazolo[3,4-a]phthalazine (alpha5IA). Consistent with its greater alpha5 inverse agonism, MRK-016 increased long-term potentiation in mouse hippocampal slices to a greater extent than alpha5IA. MRK-016 gave good receptor occupancy after oral dosing in rats, with the dose required to produce 50% occupancy being 0.39 mg/kg and a corresponding rat plasma EC(50) value of 15 ng/ml that was similar to the rhesus monkey plasma EC(50) value of 21 ng/ml obtained using [(11)C]flumazenil positron emission tomography. In normal rats, MRK-016 enhanced cognitive performance in the delayed matching-to-position version of the Morris water maze but was not anxiogenic, and in mice it was not proconvulsant and did not produce kindling. MRK-016 had a short half-life in rat, dog, and rhesus monkey (0.3-0.5 h) but had a much lower rate of turnover in human compared with rat, dog, or rhesus monkey hepatocytes. Accordingly, in human, MRK-016 had a longer half-life than in preclinical species ( approximately 3.5 h). Although it was well tolerated in young males, with a maximal tolerated single dose of 5 mg corresponding to an estimated occupancy in the region of 75%, MRK-016 was poorly tolerated in elderly subjects, even at a dose of 0.5 mg, which, along with its variable human pharmacokinetics, precluded its further development.

Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of digoxin in healthy subjects receiving etoricoxib.

AIMS: Digoxin is a commonly prescribed cardiac glycoside with a narrow therapeutic index. The aim was to investigate whether the cyclooxygenase-2 selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug etoricoxib affects the steady-state pharmacokinetics of digoxin. METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-period cross-over study. In each period, 14 healthy volunteers ranging in age from 21 to 35 years received oral digoxin 0.25 mg daily and were randomized to either etoricoxib 120 mg or matching placebo tablets once daily for 10 days. Trough digoxin plasma concentrations were analysed by linear regression to examine digoxin accumulation over time. RESULTS: The geometric mean ratios (etoricoxib/placebo) for AUC(0-24h), C(max) and urinary excretion were 1.06 (90% confidence interval 0.97, 1.17), 1.33 (1.21, 1.46) and 1.10 (1.00, 1.20), respectively. The median (range) for digoxin T(max) (h) values with etoricoxib and placebo were 0.5 (0.5, 1.5) and 1.0 (0.5, 1.5), respectively. Steady-state digoxin plasma concentrations were achieved by day 7 in each treatment period. No serious adverse experiences were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Although etoricoxib 120 mg did produce an approximately 33% increase in digoxin C(max), this increase does not appear to be clinically meaningful, as cardiotoxicity with digoxin has been associated with elevations in steady-state rather than peak concentrations. From these results, it appears that etoricoxib does not cause any changes in digoxin steady-state pharmacokinetics that would necessitate a dose adjustment.

The effect of etoricoxib on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of warfarin.

The effects of etoricoxib on pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic parameters of warfarin were determined in healthy men and women. Subjects titrated with warfarin to an international normalized ratio for prothrombin time of 1.4 to 1.7 during a 28-day prestudy period were randomly assigned in crossover fashion to be coadministered etoricoxib (120 mg) or matching placebo over two 21-day continuous periods. On day 21, a 24-hour pharmacokinetic profile of both S(-) and R(+) warfarin, as well as international normalized ratio values, were determined. Etoricoxib increased the international normalized ratio by 13% (90% confidence interval: 8%, 19%; P

A study to determine the effects of food and multiple dosing on the pharmacokinetics of vorinostat given orally to patients with advanced cancer.

PURPOSE: This phase I study, conducted in advanced-stage cancer patients, assessed the safety and tolerability of oral vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid), single-dose and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of vorinostat, and the effect of a high-fat meal on vorinostat pharmacokinetics. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients (n = 23) received single doses of 400 mg vorinostat on day 1 (fasted) and day 5 (fed) with 48 hours of pharmacokinetic sampling on both days. Patients received 400 mg vorinostat once daily on days 7 to 28. On day 28, vorinostat was given (fed) with pharmacokinetic sampling for 24 hours after dose. RESULTS: The apparent t(1/2) of vorinostat was short (approximately 1.5 hours). A high-fat meal was associated with a small increase in the extent of absorption and a modest decrease in the rate of absorption. A short lag time was observed before detectable levels of vorinostat were observed in the fed state, and T(max) was delayed. Vorinostat concentrations were qualitatively similar following single-dose and multiple-dose administration; the accumulation ratio based on area under the curve was 1.21. The elimination of vorinostat occurred primarily through metabolism, with <1% of the given dose recovered intact in urine. The most common vorinostat-related adverse experiences were mild to moderate nausea, anorexia, fatigue, increased blood creatinine, and vomiting. CONCLUSIONS: Vorinostat concentrations were qualitatively similar after single and multiple doses. A high-fat meal increased the extent and modestly decreased the rate of absorption of vorinostat; this effect is not anticipated to be clinically meaningful. Continued investigation of 400 mg vorinostat given once daily in phase II and III efficacy studies is warranted.

Metabolism and disposition of a potent and selective GABA-Aalpha2/3 receptor agonist in healthy male volunteers.

[14C]7-(1,1-Dimethylethyl)-6-(2-ethyl-2H-1,2,4-triazol-3-ylmethoxy)-3-(2-fluorophenyl)-1,2,4-triazolo[4,3-b]pyridazine ([14C]-TPA023; 99 microCi/dose) was administered to five young, healthy, fasted male subjects as a single oral dose (3.0 mg) in solution (propylene glycol/water, 10:90 v/v). The parent compound was rapidly absorbed (plasma Tmax approximately 2 h), exhibited an apparent terminal half-life of 6.7 h, and accounted for approximately 53% of the total radioactivity in plasma. After 7 days of collection, the mean total recovery of radioactivity in the excreta was 82.6%, with 53.2% and 29.4% in urine and feces, respectively. Radiochromatographic analysis of the excreta revealed that TPA023 was metabolized extensively, and only trace amounts of unchanged parent were recovered. Radiochromatograms of urine and feces showed that TPA023 underwent metabolism via three pathways (t-butyl hydroxylation, N-deethylation, and direct N-glucuronidation). The products of t-butyl hydroxylation and N-deethylation, together with their corresponding secondary metabolites, accounted for the majority of the radioactivity in the excreta. In addition, approximately 10.3% of the dose was recovered in urine as the triazolo-pyridazine N1-glucuronide of TPA023. The t-butyl hydroxy and N-desethyl metabolites of TPA023, the TPA023 N1-glucuronide, and the triazolo-pyridazine N1-glucuronide of N-desethyl TPA023 were present in plasma. In healthy male subjects, therefore, TPA023 is well absorbed and is metabolized extensively (t-butyl hydroxylation and N-deethylation > glucuronidation), and the metabolites are excreted in urine and feces.

The effects of modifying in vivo cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) activity on etoricoxib pharmacokinetics and of etoricoxib administration on CYP3A activity.

To investigate the influence of modifying in vivo cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) activity on the pharmacokinetics of etoricoxib, a selective inhibitor of cyclooxygenase-2, and of etoricoxib administration on CYP3A activity, a 3-part, randomized, crossover study was conducted in 3 panels of healthy volunteers. In part I, 8 subjects were administered a single dose of 60 mg etoricoxib alone and following daily doses of 400 mg ketoconazole, a known strong inhibitor of CYP3A. In part II, 8 different subjects were administered a single dose of 60 mg etoricoxib alone and following daily doses of 600 mg rifampin, a known strong inducer of CYP3A. In parts I and II, plasma samples were collected following each etoricoxib dose and analyzed for etoricoxib. In part III, 8 different subjects were administered 120 mg etoricoxib or placebo once daily for 11 days, and the erythromycin breath test was administered on day 11 of each period. Coadministration of etoricoxib with daily doses of ketoconazole resulted in an average 43% increase in etoricoxib AUC; based on previous studies, this increase would not be expected to have any clinically meaningful effect. In contrast, coadministration of etoricoxib with daily doses of rifampin had a potentially clinically important effect on etoricoxib pharmacokinetics (average 65% decrease in etoricoxib AUC). Etoricoxib had no effect on hepatic CYP3A activity, as assessed by the erythromycin breath test.

Etoricoxib in acute pain associated with dental surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active comparator-controlled dose-ranging study.

BACKGROUND: Patients experiencing acute pain after surgery, including dental surgery, often require analgesia. Ideally, the chosen analgesic should have a rapid onset and sustained effect. Etoricoxib is a new cyclooxygenase-2-selective inhibitor that has demonstrated analgesic efficacy in the treatment of acute pain with a rapid onset and long-lasting pain relief. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to determine the analgesic effect of single oral doses of etoricoxib 60, 120, 180, and 240 mg compared with placebo in the treatment of pain after dental surgery. Ibuprofen was used as an active control. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, single-dose, placebo- and active comparator-controlled study performed at a single center. It consisted of 3 visits (prestudy, treatment, and poststudy). Eligible patients were aged > or =16 years with moderate or severe pain after surgical extraction of > or =2 third molars, of which > or =1 was an impacted mandibular molar. Patients were assessed over 24 hours and reported pain intensity and pain relied at 14 predefined time points. Plasma samples for a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis were collected from a subset of patients at baseline and the 14 predefined time points. The end points included total pain relief over 8 hours (TOPAR8, the primary end point), sum of pain intensity difference over 8 hours, patient's global evaluation of treatment, median time to onset of pain relief (2-stopwatch method), peak pain relief, and duration of analgesic effect (median time to use of rescue medication). Adverse events were collected up to 14 days postdose. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-eight (63.1% women, 36.9% men; mean age, 21.1 years; 72.1% white, 27.9% other; mean number of third molars removed, 3.5; 65.2% experiencing moderate pain) were randomly allocated to receive etoricoxib 60 mg (n = 75), etoricoxib 120 mg (n = 76), etoricoxib 180 mg (n = 74), etoricoxib 240 mg (n = 76), ibuprofen 400 mg (n = 48), and placebo (n = 49). All active treatments had significantly greater overall analgesic effect (TOPAR8) compared with placebo (P < or 0.001). Patients who received etoricoxib 120 and 180 mg had significantly higher TOPAR8 scores than those who received etoricoxib 60 mg ( P < = 0.001) and ibuprofen (P < 0.05 etoricoxib 120 mg; P < or = 0.001 etoricoxib 180 mg). Least-squares mean TOPAR8 scores for etoricoxib 60, 120, 180, and 240 mg, ibuprofen, and placebo were 16.0, 22.0, 23.5, 20.7, 18.6, and 5.2, respectively. The median time to onset of analgesia was 24 minutes for etoricoxib 120, 180, and 240 mg, and 30 minutes for etoricoxib 60 mg and ibuprofen. There were no significant differences in the onset of analgesia between etoricoxib 120, 180, and 240 mg and ibuprofen. The duration of analgesic effect was >24 hours for etoricoxib 120, 180, and 240 mg, and 12.1 hours for etoricoxib 60 mg. The duration of effect was significantly longer with all 4 etoricoxib doses compared with ibuprofen (10.1 hours; P < 0.05 etoricoxib 60 mg; < or = 0.001etoricoxib 120, 180, and 240 mg) and compared with placebo (2.1 hours; P < = 0.001). In the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis (n approximately 120), there was a linear relationship between plasma etoricoxib concentrations and pain relief scores up to the maximum observed concentration, followed by a decline in plasma concentrations with persistent analgesia. The most common adverse events were postextraction alveolitis and nausea. CONCLUSIONS: In this dose-ranging study, etoricoxib 120 mg was determined to be the minimum dose that had maximal efficacy in patients with moderate to severe acute pain associated with dental surgery. Both etoricoxib and ibuprofen were generally well tolerated.

Pharmacokinetics of etoricoxib in patients with renal impairment.

The effect of renal insufficiency on the pharmacokinetics of etoricoxib, a selective inhibitor of cyclooxygenase-2, was examined in 23 patients with varying degrees of renal impairment (12 moderate [creatinine clearance between 30 and 50 mL/min/1.73 m2], 5 severe [creatinine clearance below 30 mL/min/1.73 m2], and 6 with end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis) following administration of single 120-mg oral doses of etoricoxib. Even the most severe renal impairment was found to have little effect on etoricoxib pharmacokinetics. The low recovery of etoricoxib in dialysate (less than 6% of the dose) supports that hemodialysis also has little effect on etoricoxib pharmacokinetics, and binding of etoricoxib to plasma proteins was generally unaffected by renal disease. Single doses of etoricoxib were generally well tolerated by patients with renal impairment. Based on pharmacokinetic considerations, dosing adjustments are not necessary for patients with any degree of renal impairment. However, because patients with advanced renal disease (creatinine clearance below 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) are likely to be very sensitive to any further compromise of renal function, and there is no long-term clinical experience in these patients, the use of etoricoxib is not recommended in patients with advanced renal disease.

An evaluation of the dose-dependent inhibition of CYP1A2 by rofecoxib using theophylline as a CYP1A2 probe.

This study was undertaken to determine whether rofecoxib can interfere with CYP1A2 activity in humans using theophylline as a probe substrate. Single oral doses of theophylline were administered to each of three panels of 12 healthy subjects receiving daily doses of rofecoxib for 7 days to examine the effect of rofecoxib administration on the absorption and disposition of theophylline. Each panel was administered doses of 12.5, 25, or 50 mg of rofecoxib or a matching placebo in a two-way, randomized, crossover fashion and administered a single oral 300-mg dose of theophylline on day 7 of rofecoxib or placebo administration. Plasma concentrations of theophylline were monitored for 48 hours postdose to assess differences in pharmacokinetics. All three commercially marketed doses of rofecoxib were found to slow the clearance of theophylline with no detectable effect on absorption. CL/F values for theophylline were estimated from AUC infinity and by point estimates from the concentrations of drug in plasma at 12 and 24 hours postdose. The point estimates of CL/F were found to be in agreement with those derived from AUC.

Pharmacokinetics of etoricoxib in patients with hepatic impairment.

The effect of hepatic insufficiency on the pharmacokinetics of etoricoxib, a selective inhibitor of cyclooxygenase-2, was investigated following administration of single and multiple oral doses to mild hepatic insufficiency patients (Child-Pugh score of 5 to 6), multiple oral doses to moderate hepatic insufficiency patients (Child-Pugh score of 7 to 9), and single intravenous doses to both mild and moderate hepatic insufficiency patients. A trend of decreasing systemic clearance with increasing hepatic impairment was observed. Absorption of etoricoxib was unaffected by hepatic impairment. Binding of etoricoxib to plasma proteins was also found to be unaffected by hepatic disease. Etoricoxib was generally well tolerated by patients with mild and moderate hepatic insufficiency. Together, these results support a 60-mg once-daily dosing regimen for mild hepatic insufficiency patients and a 60-mg every-other-day dosing regimen for moderate hepatic insufficiency patients. There are no clinical or pharmacokinetic data in patients with severe hepatic insufficiency (Child-Pugh score > 9).

Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of etoricoxib, a selective inhibitor of cyclooxygenase-2, in man.

The single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of etoricoxib, a selective inhibitor of cyclooxygenase-2, were examined in two clinical studies. Single-dose pharmacokinetics--including dose proportionality, absolute bioavailability of the highest dose-strength (120-mg) tablet, and the effect of a high-fat meal on the bioavailability of that tablet--were investigated in a two-part, open, balanced crossover study in two panels of healthy subjects (12 per panel). Steady-state pharmacokinetics were investigated in an open-label study in which 24 healthy subjects were administered 120-mg single and multiple (once daily for 10 days) oral doses of etoricoxib tablets. The pharmacokinetics of etoricoxib were found to be consistent with linearity through doses at least twofold greater than the highest anticipated clinical dose of 120 mg. Etoricoxib administered as a tablet was rapidly and completely absorbed and available; the absolute bioavailability was estimated to be 100%. A high-fat meal decreased the rate of absorption without affecting the extent of absorption of etoricoxib; therefore, etoricoxib can be dosed irrespective of food. Steady-state pharmacokinetics of etoricoxib, achieved following 7 days of once-daily dosing, were found to be reasonably predicted from single doses. The accumulation ratio averaged 2.1, and the corresponding accumulation t1/2 averaged 22 hours, supporting once-daily dosing. Etoricoxib was generally well tolerated.

Absorption, metabolism, and excretion of etoricoxib, a potent and selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, in healthy male volunteers.

[(14)C]Etoricoxib (100 microCi/dose) was administered to six healthy male subjects (i.v., 25 mg; p.o., 100 mg). Following the i.v. dose, the plasma clearance was 57 ml/min, and the harmonic mean half-life was 24.8 h. Etoricoxib accounted for the majority of the radioactivity (approximately 75%) present in plasma following both i.v. and p.o. doses. The oral dose, administered as a solution in polyethylene glycol-400, was well absorbed (absolute bioavailability of approximately 83%). Total recovery of radioactivity in the excreta was 90% (i.v.) and 80% (p.o.), with 70% (i.v.) and 60% (p.o.) excreted in urine and 20% in feces after either route of administration. Radiochromatographic analysis of the excreta revealed that etoricoxib was metabolized extensively, and only a minor fraction of the dose (<1%) was excreted unchanged. Radiochromatograms of urine and feces showed that the 6'-carboxylic acid derivative of etoricoxib was the major metabolite observed (> or =65% of the total radioactivity). 6'-Hydroxymethyl-etoricoxib and etoricoxib-1'-N-oxide, as well as the O-beta-D-glucuronide conjugate and the 1'-N-oxide derivative of 6'-hydroxymethyl-etoricoxib, were present in the excreta also (individually, < or =10% of the total radioactivity). In healthy male subjects, therefore, etoricoxib is well absorbed, is metabolized extensively via oxidation (6'-methyl oxidation >1'-N-oxidation), and the metabolites are excreted largely in the urine.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of rofecoxib : comparison of tablet and suspension formulations.

OBJECTIVE: Rofecoxib suspension is a formulation developed to increase the convenience of rofecoxib therapy for patients who have difficulty swallowing tablets. This open-label, two-part study compared the single-dose pharmacokinetics of rofecoxib tablets and rofecoxib suspension in healthy subjects. DESIGN AND STUDY PARTICIPANTS: Part I was a two-period crossover study that assessed the bioequivalence of the 12.5mg/5mL rofecoxib suspension and the 12.5mg rofecoxib tablet in 24 healthy subjects (12 men and 12 women). Part II was a crossover study in 24 additional healthy subjects (12 men and 12 women) that determined the bioequivalence of the rofecoxib 25mg/5mL suspension and the 25mg rofecoxib tablet. RESULTS: No clinically meaningful differences between rofecoxib tablet and suspension were apparent with respect to the rofecoxib area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) and maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), the primary measures of bioequivalence. At the 12.5mg and 25mg doses, the 90% CI for the geometric mean ratio (suspension/tablet) of both AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) fell within the prespecified interval for bioequivalence (0.80-1.25). CONCLUSIONS: The rofecoxib suspension is bioequivalent to the rofecoxib tablet at single oral doses of 12.5mg and 25mg in healthy volunteers. The convenience and ease of administration of rofecoxib suspension may translate into increased compliance with therapy compared with a conventional solid tablet formulation, particularly for elderly patients.