Influencia de la vacunación antigripal y la comorbilidad en la evolución de los pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19 / Influence of influenza vaccine and comorbidity on the evolution of hospitalized COVID-19 patients

Antecedentes y objetivo:El brote de la enfermedad COVID-19 está evolucionando en todo el mundo. El objetivo del estudio es evaluar la asociación entre la vacunación antigripal y el riesgo de mortalidad en pacientes con COVID-19 hospitalizados, así como otros factores de riesgo.Materiales y métodos:Estudio observacional retrospectivo. Se realizó entre pacientes hospitalizados con COVID-19 del Hospital La Mancha Centro entre el 5 y el 25 de marzo de 2020. Utilizamos una regresión logística multivariable para explorar la asociación entre la vacunación antigripal y la mortalidad por COVID y otros factores de riesgo.Resultados:Se incluyeron 410 pacientes. La vacunación antigripal no tuvo efecto entre los pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19 (OR: 1,55 [IC 95%; 0,96-2,48; p = 0,071]). El aumento de la mortalidad intrahospitalaria se asoció con edad avanzada (OR: 1,05 [IC 95%; 1,02-1,07]), por cada aumento de año; p < 0,001, Charlson ≥ 3 (OR: 1,84 [IC 95%; 1,07-3,15, p = 0,027]) e insuficiencia cardíaca al ingreso (OR: 6 [IC 95%; 1,6-21,7; p = 0,007]).Conclusiones:La vacuna antigripal no tuvo efecto en la evolución de pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19. Los factores de riesgo identificados fueron la edad avanzada, mayor comorbilidad e insuficiencia cardíaca al ingreso. (AU)

Background and objective:The COVID-19 coronavirus disease outbreak is evolving around the world. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between influenza vaccination and the risk of mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, as well as other risk factors.Materials and methods:Retrospective observational study. This study was conducted among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 at Hospital La Mancha Centro between March 5 and 25, 2020. Information on influenza vaccination was extracted from electronic medical records. We used a multivariate logistic regression to explore the association between influenza vaccination and mortality from COVID and other risk factors.Results:410 patients were included. Influenza vaccine had no effect among COVID-19 hospitalized patients [OR: 1.55 (95%CI: 0.96 – 2.48; p=0.071)]. Increasing hospital mortality was associated with older age [OR: 1.05 (95% CI 1.02–1.07), per year increase; p<0.001)], Charlson ≥3 [OR: 1.84 (95%CI: 1.07-3.15, p=0.027)] and heart failure on admission [OR: 6 (IC95%: 1.6 – 21.7; p=0.007)]Conclusions:Influenza vaccine had no effect among COVID-19 hospitalized patients. The risk factors identified were older age, higher comorbidity and heart failure on admission. (AU)

Influence of influenza vaccine and comorbidity on the evolution of hospitalized COVID-19 patients⋆.

Background and objective: The COVID-19 coronavirus disease outbreak is evolving around the world. Objective: To evaluate the associations between influenza vaccination and other factors and the risk of mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Materials and methods: Retrospective observational study. This study was conducted among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 at Hospital La Mancha Centro between March 5 and 25, 2020. Information on influenza vaccination was extracted from electronic medical records. We used a multivariate logistic regression to explore the association between influenza vaccination and mortality from COVID and other risk factors. Results: 410 patients were included. Influenza vaccine had no effect among COVID-19 hospitalized patients [OR: 1.55 (95%CI: 0.96-2.48; p = 0.071)]. Increasing hospital mortality was associated with older age [OR: 1.05 (95% CI 1.02-1.07), per year increase; p < 0.001)], Charlson ≥3 [OR: 1.84 (95%CI: 1.07-3.15, p = 0.027)] and heart failure on admission [OR: 6 (IC95%: 1.6-21.7; p = 0.007)]. Conclusions: Influenza vaccine had no effect among COVID-19 hospitalized patients. The risk factors identified were older age, higher comorbidity and heart failure on admission.

Antecedentes y objetivo: El brote de la enfermedad COVID-19 está evolucionando en todo el mundo. Objetivo: Evaluar la asociación de la vacunación antigripal y otros factores y el riesgo de mortalidad en pacientes con COVID-19 hospitalizados. Materiales y métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo. Se realizó entre pacientes hospitalizados con COVID-19 del Hospital La Mancha Centro entre el 5 y el 25 de marzo de 2020. Utilizamos una regresión logística multivariable para explorar la asociación entre la vacunación antigripal y la mortalidad por COVID y otros factores de riesgo. Resultados: Se incluyeron 410 pacientes. La vacunación antigripal no tuvo efecto entre los pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19 [OR: 1,55 (IC95%: 0,96­2,48; p = 0,071)]. El aumento de la mortalidad intrahospitalaria se asoció con edad avanzada [OR: 1,05, (IC95%: 1,02­1,07), por cada aumento de año; p < 0.001)], Charlson ≥ 3 [OR: 1,84 (IC95%: 1,07­3,15, p = 0,027)] e insuficiencia cardíaca al ingreso [OR: 6 (IC95%: 1,6­21,7; p = 0,007)]. Conclusiones: La vacuna antigripal no tuvo efecto en la evolución de pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19. Los factores de riesgo identificados fueron la edad avanzada, mayor comorbilidad e insuficiencia cardíaca al ingreso.

Aprotinin treatment against SARS-CoV-2: A randomized phase III study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a pan-protease inhibitor for moderate COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 virus requires host proteases to cleave its spike protein to bind to its ACE2 target through a two-step furin-mediated entry mechanism. Aprotinin is a broad-spectrum protease inhibitor that has been employed as antiviral drug for other human respiratory viruses. Also, it has important anti-inflammatory properties for inhibiting the innate immunity contact system. METHODS: This was a multicentre, double-blind, randomized trial performed in four Spanish hospitals comparing standard treatment versus standard treatment + aprotinin for patients with COVID-19 between 20 May 2020 and 20 October 2021. The primary efficacy outcomes were length of hospital stay and ICU admission. The secondary endpoints were each of the primary efficacy outcomes and a composite of oxygen therapy, analytical parameters and death. Safety outcomes included adverse reactions to treatment during a 30-day follow-up period. Treatment was given for 11 days or till discharge. RESULTS: With almost identical analytical profiles, significant differences were observed in treatment time, which was 2 days lower in the aprotinin group (p = .002), and length of hospital admission, which was 5 days shorter in the aprotinin group (p = .003). The incidence of discharge was 2.19 times higher (HR: 2.188 [1.182-4.047]) in the aprotinin group than in the placebo group (p = .013). In addition, the aprotinin-treated group required less oxygen therapy and had no adverse reactions or side effects. CONCLUSION: Inhaled aprotinin may improve standard treatment and clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, resulting in a shorter treatment time and hospitalization compared with the placebo group. The administration of aprotinin was safe.

Factores de riesgo de mortalidad en pacientes mayores de 65 años hospitalizados por COVID-19 / Risk factors for mortality in patients over 65 years old hospitalized by COVID-19

Antecedentes y objetivoCOVID-19 es una enfermedad causada por el coronavirus 2 del síndrome respiratorio agudo grave (SARS-CoV-2), que ha provocado una pandemia que sufrimos en la actualidad.Objetivo:identificar factores asociados con la mortalidad en pacientes de 65 años o más hospitalizados por COVID-19.Materiales y métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo. Incluimos pacientes de edad ≥65 años ingresados por COVID-19 entre el 5 y el 25 de marzo del 2020. Utilizamos el análisis bivariante y la regresión logística multivariante para determinar los factores de riesgo asociados a la mortalidad hospitalaria.Resultados: Se incluyeron 277 pacientes en el presente estudio. El análisis bivariante mostró diferencias significativas (p<0,05) entre fallecidos y supervivientes: edad, mayor dependencia y comorbilidad, antecedentes de cardiopatía isquémica, insuficiencia renal y neoplasias no hematológicas, insuficiencia cardiaca durante el ingreso, leucocitosis, valores elevados de creatinina, PCR, GOT y troponina Ic, linfopenia, y disminución de SatO2 y pH sanguíneo. La regresión logística multivariante reveló que la edad ≥65 años [OR: 4,23 (IC 95%: 1,43-12,52); p=0,009], linfopenia <1.000/μl [OR: 2,36 (IC 95%: 1,07-5,20); p=0,033], creatinina>1,2mg/dl [OR: 3,08 (IC 95%: 1,37-6,92); p=0,006], SatO2 <90% [OR: 2,29 (IC 95%: 1,01-5,21); p=0,049] y la troponina Ic>11ng/ml [OR: 2,32 (IC 95%: 1,04-5,16); p=0,040] se asociaron independientemente con mayor mortalidad hospitalaria.Conclusiones: La edad avanzada, linfopenia, SatO2 <90%, valores elevados de creatinina y troponina Ic se asociaron independientemente con mayor mortalidad en pacientes hospitalizados con COVID-19, lo que podría ayudar a los médicos a identificar a los pacientes con mal pronóstico para su manejo y tratamiento. (AU)

Background and objectiveCOVID-19 is a disease caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and has caused a global pandemic that we are currently suffering from.Objective: to identify factors associated with the death of patients aged 65 years or older hospitalized for COVID-19.Materials and methods: Retrospective cohort study. We included patients aged 65 years or older who were hospitalized for COVID-19 and dead o discharged between March 5 and 25, 2020. We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression methods to explore the risk factors associated with in-hospital death.Results: 277 patients were included in this study. The bivariate analysis showed significant differences (p<0.05) between survivors and non survivors: age, increased dependence and comorbidity, history of ischemic heart disease, renal failure and non-hematological neoplasms, heart failure during admission, leukocytosis, elevated creatinine, PCR, GOT and troponin Ic values, lymphopenia, and decreased blood pH and SatO2. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that age ≥65 years (OR: 4.23 (95% CI: 1.43-12.52; p=0.009), lymphopenia <1000/μL (OR: 2.36 (95% CI: 1.07-5.20; p=0.033), creatinine>1.2mg/dL (OR: 3.08 (95% CI: 1.37-6.92; p=0.006), SatO2 <90% (OR: 2.29 (95% CI: 1.01-5.21; p=0.049) and troponin Ic>11ng/mL (OR: 2.32 (95% CI: 1.04-5.16; p=0.040) were independently associated with higher hospital mortality. Conclusions: Older age, lymphopenia, SatO2 <90%, elevated creatinine and troponin Ic values were independently associated with higher mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, these factors could help clinicians to identify patients with poor prognosis. (AU)

Influence of influenza vaccine and comorbidity on the evolution of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. / Influencia de la vacunación antigripal y la comorbilidad en la evolución de los pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 coronavirus disease outbreak is evolving around the world. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between influenza vaccination and the risk of mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, as well as other risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study. This study was conducted among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 at Hospital La Mancha Centro between March 5 and 25, 2020. Information on influenza vaccination was extracted from electronic medical records. We used a multivariate logistic regression to explore the association between influenza vaccination and mortality from COVID and other risk factors. RESULTS: 410 patients were included. Influenza vaccine had no effect among COVID-19 hospitalized patients [OR: 1.55 (95%CI: 0.96 - 2.48; p=0.071)]. Increasing hospital mortality was associated with older age [OR: 1.05 (95% CI 1.02-1.07), per year increase; p<0.001)], Charlson ≥3 [OR: 1.84 (95%CI: 1.07-3.15, p=0.027)] and heart failure on admission [OR: 6 (IC95%: 1.6 - 21.7; p=0.007)] CONCLUSIONS: Influenza vaccine had no effect among COVID-19 hospitalized patients. The risk factors identified were older age, higher comorbidity and heart failure on admission.

[Risk factors for mortality in patients over 65 years old hospitalized by COVID-19]. / Factores de riesgo de mortalidad en pacientes mayores de 65 años hospitalizados por COVID-19.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: COVID-19 is a disease caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and has caused a global pandemic that we are currently suffering from. OBJECTIVE: to identify factors associated with the death of patients aged 65 years or older hospitalized for COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study. We included patients aged 65 years or older who were hospitalized for COVID-19 and dead o discharged between March 5 and 25, 2020. We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression methods to explore the risk factors associated with in-hospital death. RESULTS: 277 patients were included in this study. The bivariate analysis showed significant differences (p<0.05) between survivors and non survivors: age, increased dependence and comorbidity, history of ischemic heart disease, renal failure and non-hematological neoplasms, heart failure during admission, leukocytosis, elevated creatinine, PCR, GOT and troponin Ic values, lymphopenia, and decreased blood pH and SatO2. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that age ≥65 years (OR: 4.23 (95% CI: 1.43-12.52; p=0.009), lymphopenia <1000/µL (OR: 2.36 (95% CI: 1.07-5.20; p=0.033), creatinine>1.2mg/dL (OR: 3.08 (95% CI: 1.37-6.92; p=0.006), SatO2 <90% (OR: 2.29 (95% CI: 1.01-5.21; p=0.049) and troponin Ic>11ng/mL (OR: 2.32 (95% CI: 1.04-5.16; p=0.040) were independently associated with higher hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Older age, lymphopenia, SatO2 <90%, elevated creatinine and troponin Ic values were independently associated with higher mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, these factors could help clinicians to identify patients with poor prognosis.

Estudio de coste-efectividad del diagnóstico microbiológico de tuberculosis mediante geneXpert MTB/RIF(R) / Cost-effectiveness study of the microbiological diagnosis of tuberculosis using geneXpert MTB/RIF(R)

Introducción/Objetivo: Evaluar mediante un análisis de coste-efectividad la aplicación de una técnica de biología molecular al diagnóstico de tuberculosis frente a la alternativa diagnóstica clásica. Métodos: Se realizó un análisis de coste-efectividad para evaluar la aplicación teórica de un procedimiento de biología molecular que incluye 2 alternativas de una técnica para la detección precoz de Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex y resistencia a rifampicina (alternativa1: una determinación a pacientes seleccionados; alternativa2: 2 determinaciones a todos los pacientes). Ambas alternativas se compararon con el procedimiento habitual de diagnóstico microbiológico de tuberculosis realizado a 1972 pacientes durante 2008-2012 (microscopia y cultivo). La medida de la efectividad se hizo en QALY y la incertidumbre se trató mediante análisis de sensibilidad univariable, multivariable y probabilístico. Resultados: Para el método habitual se obtuvo un valor de 8.588€/QALY. En la alternativa1 el gasto fue de 8.487€/QALY, mientras que en la alternativa2 el cociente coste-efectivo ascendió a 2.960€/QALY. La alternativa2 fue la de mayor eficiencia diagnóstica, alcanzando una reducción del 75% del número de días que un paciente con tuberculosis permanece sin tratamiento adecuado, así como una reducción del 70% del número de días que un paciente sin tuberculosis permanece ingresado. Conclusión: La aplicación de una técnica microbiológica molecular en el diagnóstico de tuberculosis es sumamente coste-efectiva frente al método habitual. Su introducción en el procedimiento diagnóstico de rutina supondría una mejora en la calidad asistencial de los pacientes al evitar ingresos y tratamientos innecesarios, reflejándose en un ahorro económico al hospital (AU)

Introduction/Objective: To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of a molecular biology technique for the diagnosis of tuberculosis compared to the classical diagnostic alternative. Methods: A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to evaluate the theoretical implementation of a molecular biology method including two alternative techniques for early detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex, and resistance to rifampicin (alternative1: one determination in selected patients; alternative2: two determinations in all the patients). Both alternatives were compared with the usual procedure for microbiological diagnosis of tuberculosis (staining and microbiological culture), and was accomplished on 1,972 patients in the period in 2008-2012. The effectiveness was measured in QALYs, and the uncertainty was assessed by univariate, multivariate and probabilistic analysis of sensitivity. Results: A value of €8,588/QALYs was obtained by the usual method. Total expenditure with the alternative1 was €8,487/QALYs, whereas with alternative2, the cost-effectiveness ratio amounted to €2,960/QALYs. Greater diagnostic efficiency was observed by applying the alternative2, reaching a 75% reduction in the number of days that a patient with tuberculosis remains without an adequate treatment, and a 70% reduction in the number of days that a patient without tuberculosis remains in hospital. Conclusion: The implementation of a molecular microbiological technique in the diagnosis of tuberculosis is extremely cost-effective compared to the usual method. Its introduction into the routine diagnostic procedure could lead to an improvement in quality care for patients, given that it would avoid both unnecessary hospitalisations and treatments, and reflected in economic savings to the hospital (AU)

Cost-effectiveness study of the microbiological diagnosis of tuberculosis using geneXpert MTB/RIF®. / Estudio de coste-efectividad del diagnóstico microbiológico de tuberculosis mediante geneXpert MTB/RIF®.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVE: To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of a molecular biology technique for the diagnosis of tuberculosis compared to the classical diagnostic alternative. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to evaluate the theoretical implementation of a molecular biology method including two alternative techniques for early detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex, and resistance to rifampicin (alternative1: one determination in selected patients; alternative2: two determinations in all the patients). Both alternatives were compared with the usual procedure for microbiological diagnosis of tuberculosis (staining and microbiological culture), and was accomplished on 1,972 patients in the period in 2008-2012. The effectiveness was measured in QALYs, and the uncertainty was assessed by univariate, multivariate and probabilistic analysis of sensitivity. RESULTS: A value of €8,588/QALYs was obtained by the usual method. Total expenditure with the alternative1 was €8,487/QALYs, whereas with alternative2, the cost-effectiveness ratio amounted to €2,960/QALYs. Greater diagnostic efficiency was observed by applying the alternative2, reaching a 75% reduction in the number of days that a patient with tuberculosis remains without an adequate treatment, and a 70% reduction in the number of days that a patient without tuberculosis remains in hospital. CONCLUSION: The implementation of a molecular microbiological technique in the diagnosis of tuberculosis is extremely cost-effective compared to the usual method. Its introduction into the routine diagnostic procedure could lead to an improvement in quality care for patients, given that it would avoid both unnecessary hospitalisations and treatments, and reflected in economic savings to the hospital.

Coenzyme Q 10 improves lactic acidosis, strokelike episodes, and epilepsy in a patient with MELAS (mitochondrial myopathy, encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and strokelike episodes).

Mitochondrial encephalomyopathies encompass a group of disorders that have impaired oxidative metabolism in skeletal muscles and central nervous system. Many compounds have been used in clinical trials on mitochondrial diseases, but the outcomes have been variable. It remains controversial whether treatment of mitochondrial diseases with coenzyme Q 10 is effective. This paper describes a case of mitochondrial myopathy, encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, strokelike episodes, and exercise intolerance successfully treated with coenzyme Q 10. Efficacy of this therapy in this patient is correlated to control of lactic acidosis and serum creatine kinase levels. Disappointingly, larger studies with coenzyme Q 10 failed to demonstrate a clear beneficial effect on the entire study population with regard to clinical improvement or several parameters of the oxidative metabolism. They suggest that the use of coenzyme Q in treatment of mitochondrial diseases should be confined to protocols. There is a confounding variation in phenotype and genotype, and the natural history of the disorders in individual patients is not accurately predictable. The unpredictable a priori efficacy of therapy suggests that a long-term trial of oral coenzyme Q may be warranted.