Predictors of a positive oral food challenge to cow's milk in children sensitized to cow's milk

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The diagnosis of IgE-mediated cow's milk allergy (CMA) is often based on clinical history and on specific IgE levels and/or skin-prick tests (SPT), both of which are sensitive but not specific. The gold standard, oral food challenge (OFC), is expensive and time-consuming and involves a risk of severe allergic reactions. This study aimed to determine the value of specific IgEs, ratios of specific IgEs for cow's milk and its components to total IgE, and wheal size on SPT for predicting a positive OFC for CMA. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 72 patients [median age, four years; age range 0.75-15 years] sensitized to cow's milk who underwent OFCs to milk. predictive variables between patients with positive and negative OFCs were compared. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were uses to assess variables' discriminatory capacity and Youden's index to determine the best cut-offs for predicting CMA. RESULTS: The OFC was positive in 39 (54%) patients. Wheal size on SPT and all specific IgEs and specific-to-total IgE ratios were significantly different between patients with positive OFCs and those with negative OFCs (p < 0.001). The variable with the greatest area under the ROC curve was casein-specific IgE (0.98), followed by β-lactoglobulin-specific IgE (0.923), casein-specific-to-total-IgE ratio (0.919), and α-lactalbumin-specific IgE (0.908). Casein-specific IgE ≥ 0.95kU/L yielded 88.9% sensitivity and 90.9% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: In our center, casein-specific IgE > 0.95kU/L can obviate an OFC to cow's milk for the diagnosis of CMA in patients sensitized to cow's milk with a compatible history

No disponible

Predictors of a positive oral food challenge to cow's milk in children sensitized to cow's milk.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The diagnosis of IgE-mediated cow's milk allergy (CMA) is often based on clinical history and on specific IgE levels and/or skin-prick tests (SPT), both of which are sensitive but not specific. The gold standard, oral food challenge (OFC), is expensive and time-consuming and involves a risk of severe allergic reactions. This study aimed to determine the value of specific IgEs, ratios of specific IgEs for cow's milk and its components to total IgE, and wheal size on SPT for predicting a positive OFC for CMA. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 72 patients [median age, four years; age range 0.75-15 years] sensitized to cow's milk who underwent OFCs to milk. predictive variables between patients with positive and negative OFCs were compared. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were uses to assess variables' discriminatory capacity and Youden's index to determine the best cut-offs for predicting CMA. RESULTS: The OFC was positive in 39 (54%) patients. Wheal size on SPT and all specific IgEs and specific-to-total IgE ratios were significantly different between patients with positive OFCs and those with negative OFCs (p<0.001). The variable with the greatest area under the ROC curve was casein-specific IgE (0.98), followed by ß-lactoglobulin-specific IgE (0.923), casein-specific-to-total-IgE ratio (0.919), and α-lactalbumin-specific IgE (0.908). Casein-specific IgE ≥0.95kU/L yielded 88.9% sensitivity and 90.9% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: In our center, casein-specific IgE >0.95kU/L can obviate an OFC to cow's milk for the diagnosis of CMA in patients sensitized to cow's milk with a compatible history.

Lactante con distrés respiratorio en invierno. Más allá de las bronquiolitis / Infant with respiratory disters in winter. Beyond bronchiolitis

La dificultad respiratoria en el lactante engloba varias entidades clínicas. Aunque en invierno la más frecuente es la bronquiolitis, no debemos olvidar, entre ellas, las malformaciones pulmonares congénitas (MPC). Se presenta el caso de un lactante de 6 semanas de vida que acudió a Urgencias en invierno por un cuadro de dificultad respiratoria en contexto catarral. Se realizó un diagnóstico inicial de bronquiolitis, pero posteriormente se alcanzó el diagnóstico correcto de enfisema lobar congénito (ELC). Se publica este caso para hacer hincapié en la importancia de revisar un diagnóstico con enfoque analítico, especialmente cuando el curso clínico no es típico. También nos debe servir para recordar que, a pesar de la mejora del diagnóstico prenatal, el diagnóstico de una MPC puede ser en el periodo neonatal o incluso más tardío. Por lo tanto, las MPC deben considerarse en el diagnóstico diferencial de síntomas respiratorios en un niño

Respiratory distress in the infant encompasses several clinical entities. Although bronchiolitis is the most frequent in winter, we should not forget congenital pulmonary malformations (CPMs). We are reporting a case of 6-week-old male presented to pediatric emergency ward during the winter period with respiratory distress in context of a cold. An initial diagnosis of bronchiolitis was made. The authors explore how the correct diagnosis of congenital lobar emphysema (CLE) was reached. This case emphasizes the importance of reviewing a diagnosis through an analytical approach, particularly in non-typical clinical courses. It should also help us to remember that despite the improvement of prenatal diagnosis, we also have CPMs diagnosis in the neonatal period or even later. Therefore, CPMs need to be considered in the differential diagnosis of respiratory symptoms in a child

Consenso para el abordaje del asma grave pediátrica en la práctica clínica habitual / Consensus-based approach for severe paediatric asthma in routine clinical practice

INTRODUCCIÓN: La identificación adecuada del paciente pediátrico con asma grave es esencial para su correcto manejo. Sin embargo, los criterios para definir el asma grave y las recomendaciones para su control varían mucho entre las distintas guías. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se elaboró una encuesta telemática para analizar las opiniones relativas a la definición y control del asma grave pediátrica. Para lograr un consenso se siguió una metodología Delphi modificada. Con los resultados se elaboraron recomendaciones prácticas. RESULTADOS: El cuestionario fue respondido por 11 neumólogos y alergólogos pediátricos expertos en asma grave. Hubo consenso en 50 de los 65 ítems planteados (76,92%). Se consideró que un paciente tiene asma grave si en el último año ha requerido 2 o más ciclos de corticoides orales, si requiere tratamiento diario con corticoides inhalados a dosis medias (con otra medicación controladora) o dosis altas (con o sin otra medicación controladora), si no responde a un tratamiento convencional optimizado, o si la enfermedad pone en riesgo su vida o deteriora gravemente su calidad de vida. La definición de asma grave también podría incluir a los pacientes que consumen recursos sanitarios de manera regular y justificada, o tienen factores psicosociales o ambientales que impiden su control. Para la monitorización, se recomienda usar cuestionarios específicos de población pediátrica (CAN o ACT). Respecto al tratamiento, se debería considerar el uso de omalizumab en un escalón anterior al de los corticoides orales. CONCLUSIONES: El presente trabajo ofrece recomendaciones consensuadas que pueden ser de utilidad en el manejo del asma grave pediátrica

INTRODUCTION: Accurate identification of paediatric patients with severe asthma is essential for an adequate management of the disease. However, criteria for defining severe asthma and recommendations for control vary among different guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An online survey was conducted to explore expert opinions about the definition and management of severe paediatric asthma. To reach a consensus agreement, a modified Delphi technique was used, and practice guidelines were prepared after the analysis of the results. RESULTS: Eleven paediatric chest disease physicians and allergy specialists with wide expertise in severe asthma responded to the survey. Consensus was reached in 50 out of 65 questions (76.92%). It was considered that a patient has severe asthma if during the previous year they have required 2 or more cycles of oral steroids, required daily treatment with medium doses of inhaled corticosteroids (with other controller medication) or high doses (with or without other controller medication), did not respond to optimised conventional treatment, or if the disease threatened the life of the patient or seriously impairs their quality of life. The definition of severe asthma may also include patients who justifiably use health resources on a regular basis, or have psychosocial or environmental factors impeding control. For monitoring, the use of questionnaires designed specifically for paediatric population, such as CAN or ACT, is recommended. As regards treatment, the use of omalizumab should be considered prior to the use of oral corticosteroids. CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides consensus recommendations that may be useful in the management of severe paediatric asthma

[Consensus-based approach for severe paediatric asthma in routine clinical practice]. / Consenso para el abordaje del asma grave pediátrica en la práctica clínica habitual.

INTRODUCTION: Accurate identification of paediatric patients with severe asthma is essential for an adequate management of the disease. However, criteria for defining severe asthma and recommendations for control vary among different guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An online survey was conducted to explore expert opinions about the definition and management of severe paediatric asthma. To reach a consensus agreement, a modified Delphi technique was used, and practice guidelines were prepared after the analysis of the results. RESULTS: Eleven paediatric chest disease physicians and allergy specialists with wide expertise in severe asthma responded to the survey. Consensus was reached in 50 out of 65 questions (76.92%). It was considered that a patient has severe asthma if during the previous year they have required 2 or more cycles of oral steroids, required daily treatment with medium doses of inhaled corticosteroids (with other controller medication) or high doses (with or without other controller medication), did not respond to optimised conventional treatment, or if the disease threatened the life of the patient or seriously impairs their quality of life. The definition of severe asthma may also include patients who justifiably use health resources on a regular basis, or have psychosocial or environmental factors impeding control. For monitoring, the use of questionnaires designed specifically for paediatric population, such as CAN or ACT, is recommended. As regards treatment, the use of omalizumab should be considered prior to the use of oral corticosteroids. CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides consensus recommendations that may be useful in the management of severe paediatric asthma.

Experiencia pediátrica en el tratamiento del asma grave con anticuerpos anti IgE (omalizumab) / No disponible

No disponible

Inmunoterapia con alergenos inhalantes en niños menores de 5 años: indicaciones, efi cacia y seguridad / No disponible

La inmunoterapia específica con alérgenos es el único tratamiento capaz de modifi car el curso natural de las enfermedades alérgicas, siendo más efi caz cuanto más precozmente se inicie. Sin embargo, las recomendaciones de la OMS continúan considerando la edad inferior a 5 años como una contraindicación relativa. De todas formas, las últimas revisiones bibliográficas consideran iniciar el tratamiento con inmunoterapia en niños menores de 5 años afectos, sobre todo, de asma bronquial (AU)

No disponible

[Nasal potential difference test to diagnose cystic fibrosis]. / Prueba de la diferencia de potencial nasal para el diagnóstico de la fibrosis quística.

Cystic fibrosis is usually diagnosed based on suspicion arising from a typical clinical picture and must be confirmed by either a finding of high chloride concentrations in sweat tests on 2 separate days or detection of 2 gene mutations. The nasal potential difference (NPD) test has been proposed to provide evidence of abnormal function of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), a receptor that forms a chloride ion channel. The test is especially useful for patients who have normal chloride concentrations in sweat tests and in whom 2 gene mutations related to cystic fibrosis have not been detected. The NPD test requires 2 electrodes connected to a voltmeter (a Tholy-Medicap device). One is placed on the nasal mucosa of the inferior turbinate and the other is placed subcutaneously on the forearm. A reading less than -40 mV is considered abnormal, as values under that cut point are never found in healthy individuals. Two abnormal NPD findings on separate days are required for a diagnosis of CFTR dysfunction. False negatives arise when the integrity of the epithelium is altered. After application of amiloride, NPD decreases more markedly in cystic fibrosis patients than in healthy individuals and applying isoproterenol or fenoterol after amiloride provokes no response in patients with the genetic defect that prevents chloride ion channel activation.

Prueba de la diferencia de potencial nasal para el diagnóstico de la fibrosis quística / Nasal potencial difference test to diagnose cystic fibrosis

En la gran mayoría de los pacientes con fibrosis quística (FQ), el diagnóstico se sospecha por unos síntomas clínicos típicos y debe confirmarse mediante la determinación en sudor de una concentración de cloro elevada en 2 días separados o mediante la identificación de 2 mutaciones en un estudio genético. Para evidenciar el anormal comportamiento de la proteína de membrana CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator), encargada del transporte de cloro, se ha ideado la prueba de la diferencia de potencial nasal (DPN), especialmente útil en pacientes con concentraciones de cloro normales y en los que no se identifican las 2 mutaciones del gen de la FQ. Para la realización de la DPN se requieren 2 electrodos conectados a un voltímetro (dispositivo de medida Tholy-Medicap®), uno colocado sobre la mucosa nasal del cornete inferior, y otro en el tejido celular subcutáneo del antebrazo. Un valor inferior a -­40 mV se considera patológico. Los valores obtenidos en sujetos sanos no sobrepasan nunca este valor. Se precisan 2 determinaciones anormales de DPN registradas en 2 días separados para aceptar la disfunción de la CFTR. Pueden observarse falsos negativos cuando la integridad del epitelio está alterada. En la FQ, tras la aplicación de amilorida la diferencia de potencial se reduce de modo más llamativo que en sanos, y la aplicación de isoproterenol o fenoterol después de amilorida no provoca respuesta debido al defecto genético que impide la activación de los canales de cloro

Cystic fibrosis is usually diagnosed based on suspicion arising from a typical clinical picture and must be confirmed by either a finding of high chloride concentrations in sweat tests on 2 separate days or detection of 2 gene mutations. The nasal potential difference (NPD) test has been proposed to provide evidence of abnormal function of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), a receptor that forms a chloride ion channel. The test is especially useful for patients who have normal chloride concentrations in sweat tests and in whom 2 gene mutations related to cystic fibrosis have not been detected. The NPD test requires 2 electrodes connected to a voltmeter (a Tholy-Medicap® device). One is placed on the nasal mucosa of the inferior turbinate and the other is placed subcutaneously on the forearm. A reading less than -40 mV is considered abnormal, as values under that cut point are never found in healthy individuals. Two abnormal NPD findings on separate days are required for a diagnosis of CFTR dysfunction. False negatives arise when the integrity of the epithelium is altered. After application of amiloride, NPD decreases more markedly in cystic fibrosis patients than in healthy individuals and applying isoproterenol or fenoterol after amiloride provokes no response in patients with the genetic defect that prevents chloride ion channel activation

[Efficiency of methotrexate in the treatment of cortico-dependent asthmatic patients]. / Eficacia del metotrexato en el tratamiento de pacientes asmáticos corticodependientes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficiency of low doses of methotrexate as corticosteroid sparing agent in asthmatic patients requiring long term corticosteroid therapy. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted with seven adult patients and one female pediatric patient suffering from corticosteroid-dependent bronchial asthma. The minimal stabilization time for each patient before initiating treatment with MTX was 3 months. The administered dose of methotrexate was 10 mg/week p.o. for adult patients and 15 mg/week for the pediatric patient. Dose tapering of methyl-prednisolone both during the stabilization and therapy periods was a 2 mg decrease every two weeks provided that no worsening in FEV1 higher than 5% occurred. RESULTS: For the group of adult patients, the stabilization time was 5.6 +/- 2.7 months. Methyl-prednisolone dose during the stabilization period could be decreased from 15.0 mg down to 25.4 +/- 12.0 mg (p = 0.013). The period of treatment of methotrexate was 7.3 +/- 3.4 months and the dose of methyl-prednisolone could be decreased from 25.4 +/- 12.0 mg down to 12.0 +/- 11.9 mg (p < 0.001). In the pediatric patient, the deflazacor dose was decreased from 60 down to 30 mg/day during treatment with methotrexate. In all patients a significant decrease could be obtained in the MP dose during treatment with methotrexate with no decrease in FEV1. No secondary effects were observed with the exception of a labial herpes in the pediatric patient. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of one single weekly dose of methotrexate 10 mg in adults and 15 in one pediatric patient allowed for a decrease of approximately 50% in the glucocorticosteroid dosage in this group of patients with corticosteroid-dependent bronchial asthma with no relevant adverse reactions during therapy.

[Cystic fibrosis: a new disease in adults]. / Fibrosis quística: una nueva patología del adulto.

OBJECTIVE: Cystic fibrosis (CF) has undergone substantial epidemiological changes. The life expectancy of CF patients and the proportion of affected adults are rising because of advances in diagnosis and treatment. In order to find out more about our current situation, we sent an anonymous questionnaire to all affected members of the Catalonian Association of CF. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The questionnaire was sent to 180 patients and their parents asking for information about demographical aspects, diagnosis, pulmonary function, microbiological data, complications, treatment, number of medical visits to CF centers, personal, social and professional development, and the degree of satisfaction with the medical care received. RESULTS: The questionnaire was correctly completed by 75 patients. Of these, 20% were older than 18 years of age. The mean age at diagnosis was 3.25 years. The initial symptoms were: meconium ileus (8%), growth retardation (24%), respiratory problems (34%) and gastrointestinal problems (36%). Sixty percent of the patients showed positive sputum cultures. The most frequently isolated microorganism was P. aeruginosa. Apart form the usual therapy with antibiotics, enzyme replacement and vitamin supplements, other therapeutic measures employed included: alimentary supplements (54%), mucolitics (27%), bronchodilators (45%) and inhaled anti-inflammatories (20%). Complications were present in 56% of the patients and these included hemoptysis, polyps, rectal prolapse, hepatic disease, diabetes, psychological changes, biliary litiasis, pneumothorax, infertility or pancreatitis. The proportion of positive sputum cultures, the type of germ identified and the complications observed changed according to the patient's age. CONCLUSIONS: National registers can be very useful tools to make public health plans. They are also good instruments to evaluate the progress made in the treatment of diseases such as CF.