Ultrasound findings of BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy in renal transplant patients.

BK polyomavirus (BKV) is an emerging pathogen in immunocompromised patients. BKV infection occurs in 1-9 % of renal transplants and causes chronic nephropathy or graft loss. Diagnosis of BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) is based on detection of viruria then viremia and at least a tubule-interstitial nephritis at renal biopsy. This paper describes the ultrasound and color Doppler (US-CD) features of BKVAN. Seventeen patients affected by BKVAN were studied using a linear bandwidth 7-12 MHz probe. Ultrasound showed a widespread streak-like pattern with alternating normal echoic and hypoechoic streaks with irregular edges from the papilla to the cortex. Renal biopsy performed in hypoechoic areas highlighted the typical viral inclusions in tubular epithelial cells. Our experience suggests a possible role for US-CD in the non-invasive diagnosis of BKVAN when combined with blood and urine screening tests. US-CD must be performed with a high-frequency linear probe to highlight the streak-like pattern of the renal parenchyma.

[Karyomegalic interstitial nephritis: an atypical case]. / La nefrite interstiziale cariomegalica: descrizione di un caso clinico atipico.

Karyomegalic interstitial nephritis (KIN) is a rare disease entity that was first described by Burry in 1974. The prevalence of this disease is less than 1% and its pathogenesis is unclear. KIN is characterized by chronic tubulointerstitial nephritis associated with enlarged tubular epithelial cell nuclei, which leads to progressive decline of renal function. The disease has no known treatment. Here, we report on a 50-year-old female patient who presented with asymptomatic progressive decline of renal function. Renal biopsy demonstrated chronic tubulointerstitial nephritis with markedly enlarged and hyperchromic nuclei of tubule epithelial cells the hallmark of karyomegalic nephritis. Clinical and pathologic findings of this case are discussed in light of the available literature.

[Renal biopsy in the lateral position in high risk patients: an opportunity to take advantage of]. / La biopsia renale in decubito laterale nei pazienti complessi: una possibilità da sfruttare.

Percutaneous ultrasound-guided renal biopsy (RB) is the gold standard for diagnosis of renal diseases. The standard procedure involves biopsy in the prone position (PP) for the native kidneys. In high risk patients, transjugular and laparoscopic RB have been proposed. In patients suffering from obesity or respiratory diseases, the RB of the native kidney in the supine anterolateral position (SALP) represents an alternative to these invasive and expensive methods. We illustrate the technique of execution of RB in the lateral position (LP) on native kidneys. The procedure is safe, effective and has reduced the path travelled by the needle biopsy compared with PP and SALP.

[Ultrasound-guided renal biopsy: evaluation of different models of biological simulator]. / La biopsia renale-ecoguidata: valutazione di diversi modelli di simulatore biologico.

Percutaneous ultrasound-guided renal biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis and treatment of renal diseases. Recently, many studies strongly support the role of renal biopsy for the management of small renal mass. The experience of the operator is crucial in reducing the incidence of major complications. The use of simulators can accelerate the learning curve in those individuals who train in renal biopsy. We describe four simple and affordable phantoms for renal biopsy. The first two simulators were constructed by a porcine kidney wrapped in perirenal fat or covered by a flap of abdominal skin. The third simulator was constructed by embedding a porcine kidney in a turkey breast and olives to simulate the presence of small tumors. For the fourth model, we used the loin of a pork. Given the encouraging results of our in vitro study, we believe that simulators allow trainees to familiarize themselves with the handling of the equipment in an environment that is risk-free when compared to the clinical scenario.

Effect of sedation level on the prevalence of delirium when assessed with CAM-ICU and ICDSC.

PURPOSE: We hypothesized that reduced arousability (Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale, RASS, scores -2 to -3) for any reason during delirium assessment increases the apparent prevalence of delirium in intensive care patients. To test this hypothesis, we assessed delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) and Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) in intensive care patients during sedation stops, and related the findings to the level of sedation, as assessed with RASS score. METHODS: We assessed delirium in 80 patients with ICU stay longer than 48 h using CAM-ICU and ICDSC during daily sedation stops. Sedation was assessed using RASS. The effect of including patients with a RASS of -2 and -3 during sedation stop ("light to moderate sedation", eye contact less than 10 s or not at all, respectively) on prevalence of delirium was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 467 patient days were assessed. The proportion of CAM-ICU-positive evaluations decreased from 53 to 31 % (p < 0.001) if assessments from patients at RASS -2/-3 (22 % of all assessments) were excluded. Similarly, the number of positive ICDSC results decreased from 51 to 29 % (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Sedation per se can result in positive items of both CAM-ICU and ICDSC, and therefore in a diagnosis of delirium. Consequently, apparent prevalence of delirium is dependent on how a depressed level of consciousness after sedation stop is interpreted (delirium vs persisting sedation). We suggest that any reports on delirium using these assessment tools should be stratified for a sedation score during the assessment.

Optimizing utilization of kidneys from deceased donors over 60 years: five-year outcomes after implementation of a combined clinical and histological allocation algorithm.

This 5 year observational multicentre study conducted in the Nord Italian Transplant programme area evaluated outcomes in patients receiving kidneys from donors over 60 years allocated according to a combined clinical and histological algorithm. Low-risk donors 60-69 years without risk factors were allocated to single kidney transplant (LR-SKT) based on clinical criteria. Biopsy was performed in donors over 70 years or 60-69 years with risk factors, allocated to Single (HR-SKT) or Dual kidney transplant (HR-DKT) according to the severity of histological damage. Forty HR-DKTs, 41 HR-SKTs and 234 LR-SKTs were evaluated. Baseline differences generally reflected stratification and allocation criteria. Patient and graft (death censored) survival were 90% and 92% for HR-DKT, 85% and 89% for HR-SKT, 88% and 87% for LR-SKT. The algorithm appeared user-friendly in daily practice and was safe and efficient, as demonstrated by satisfactory outcomes in all groups at 5 years. Clinical criteria performed well in low-risk donors. The excellent outcomes observed in DKTs call for fine-tuning of cut-off scores for allocation to DKT or SKT in high-risk patients.

Usefulness of a clinical diagnosis of ICU-acquired paresis to predict outcome in patients with SIRS and acute respiratory failure.

PURPOSE: Neuromuscular abnormalities are common in ICU patients. We aimed to assess the incidence of clinically diagnosed ICU-acquired paresis (ICUAP) and its impact on outcome. METHODS: Forty-two patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome on mechanical ventilation for >or=48 h were prospectively studied. Diagnosis of ICUAP was defined as symmetric limb muscle weakness in at least two muscle groups at ICU discharge without other explanation. The threshold Medical Research Council (MRC) Score was set at 35 (of 50) points. Activities in daily living were scored using the Barthel Index 28 and 180 days after ICU discharge. RESULTS: Three patients died before sedation was stopped. ICUAP was diagnosed in 13 of the 39 patients (33%). Multivariate regression analysis yielded five ICUAP-predicting variables (P < 0.05): SAPS II at ICU admission, treatment with steroids, muscle relaxants or norepinephrine, and days with sepsis. Patients with ICUAP had lower admission SAPS II scores [37 +/- 13 vs. 49 +/- 15 (P = 0.018)], lower Barthel Index at 28 days and lower survival at 180 days after ICU discharge (38 vs. 77%, P = 0.033) than patients without ICUAP. Daily TISS-28 scores were similar but cumulative TISS-28 scores were higher in patients with ICUAP (664 +/- 275) than in patients without ICUAP (417 +/- 236; P = 0.008). The only independent risk factor for death before day 180 was the presence of ICUAP. CONCLUSIONS: A clinical diagnosis of ICUAP was frequently established in this patient group. Despite lower SAPS II scores, these patients needed more resources and had high mortality and prolonged recovery periods after ICU discharge.

Are the baseline chances of survival comparable between the candidates for kidney transplantation who actually receive a graft and those who never get one?

BACKGROUND: The superiority of kidney transplantation over dialysis for patient survival often is assessed by comparing the survival rate of candidates who get a graft to that of those on the waiting list who do not. This study tries to ascertain if the two groups are comparable in terms of their chances of surviving. METHODS: Of the 187 non-diabetic patients who entered our waiting list during 1998 and 1999 for first cadaveric kidney transplants, 81 received a graft and 106 did not. We compared the two groups for factors which could affect survival and that were present at the moment of acceptance on the list. As one of those factors was the clinical score quantifying health status, as given by the transplant team and rated from 1 (high risk) to 4 (very good), we assessed its reliability by evaluating the survival of the patients we transplanted between 1988 and 1996, grouped according to that score. RESULTS: Transplanted patients had been immunized less frequently (2 vs 13%; P=0.02), had a lower dialytic age (16.9+/-2.1 vs 22.9+/-2.1 months; P<0.05), and better clinical scores (2.9+/-0.1 vs 2.6+/-0.1; P<0.05). The two groups did not differ in age, gender, or the presence of single specific diseases. Logistic regression analysis confirmed the results of univariate analysis. The clinical score was a very strong predictor of patient survival, as the survival of patients transplanted from 1988 to 1996 progressively improved with better scores (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Transplanted patients actually differ from non-transplanted candidates with respect to various factors potentially affecting survival. The difference is highly relevant clinically, yet it is not easily detected when considering mainly the presence or absence of specific diseases. A global quantitative clinical parameter based on a thorough medical evaluation is required to identify differences.