Upper motor neuron assessment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis using the patellar tendon reflex and motor-evoked potentials to the lower limbs.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) diagnosis relies on signs of progressive damage to both lower motoneuron (LMN), given by clinical examination and electromyography (EMG), and upper motoneuron (UMN), given by clinical examination only. Recognition of UMN involvement, however, is still difficult, so that diagnostic delay often remains too long. Shortening the time to clinical and genetic diagnosis is essential in order to provide accurate information to patients and families, avoid time-consuming investigations and for appropriate care management. This study investigates whether combined patellar tendon reflex recording with motor-evoked potentials to the lower limbs (T-MEP-LL) is relevant to assess corticospinal function in ALS, so that it might serve as a tool improving diagnosis. T-MEP-LL were recorded in 135 patients with suspected motor neuron disease (MND) from February 2010 to March 2021. The sensitivity, specificity, and ability to improve diagnosis when added to Awaji and Gold Coast criteria were determined. The main finding of the study is that T-MEP-LL can detect UMN dysfunction with a 70% sensitivity and 63% specificity when UMN clinical signs are lacking. The sensitivity reaches 82% when considering all MND patients. Moreover, at first evaluation, using T-MEP-LL to quantify reflex briskness and to measure central conduction time, can improve the diagnostic accuracy. T-MEP-LL is easy to perform and does not need any electrical stimulation, making the test rapid, and painless. By the simultaneous quantification of both UMN and LMN system, it could also help to identify different phenotype with more accuracy than clinical examination in this broad-spectrum pathology. The question whether T-MEP-LL could further be a real biomarker need further prospective studies.

Current clinical management of CIDP with immunoglobulins in France: An expert opinion.

Treatment strategies in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) must be adapted on a case-to-case basis. Validated and reproducible tools for monitoring treatment response are required at diagnosis, when initiating treatment and throughout follow-up. A task force of French neurologists, experts in neuromuscular disease reference centers, was assembled to provide expert advice on the management of typical CIDP with intravenous immunoglobulins (Ig), and to harmonize treatment practices in public and private hospitals. The task force also referred to the practical experience of treating CIDP with Ig at the diagnostic, induction and follow-up stages, including the assessment and management of Ig dependence, and following the recommendations of the French health agency.

Impact of methodological choices in comparative effectiveness studies: application in natalizumab versus fingolimod comparison among patients with multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Natalizumab and fingolimod are used as high-efficacy treatments in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Several observational studies comparing these two drugs have shown variable results, using different methods to control treatment indication bias and manage censoring. The objective of this empirical study was to elucidate the impact of methods of causal inference on the results of comparative effectiveness studies. METHODS: Data from three observational multiple sclerosis registries (MSBase, the Danish MS Registry and French OFSEP registry) were combined. Four clinical outcomes were studied. Propensity scores were used to match or weigh the compared groups, allowing for estimating average treatment effect for treated or average treatment effect for the entire population. Analyses were conducted both in intention-to-treat and per-protocol frameworks. The impact of the positivity assumption was also assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 5,148 relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients were included. In this well-powered sample, the 95% confidence intervals of the estimates overlapped widely. Propensity scores weighting and propensity scores matching procedures led to consistent results. Some differences were observed between average treatment effect for the entire population and average treatment effect for treated estimates. Intention-to-treat analyses were more conservative than per-protocol analyses. The most pronounced irregularities in outcomes and propensity scores were introduced by violation of the positivity assumption. CONCLUSIONS: This applied study elucidates the influence of methodological decisions on the results of comparative effectiveness studies of treatments for multiple sclerosis. According to our results, there are no material differences between conclusions obtained with propensity scores matching or propensity scores weighting given that a study is sufficiently powered, models are correctly specified and positivity assumption is fulfilled.

Pregnancy and myopathies: Reciprocal impacts between pregnancy, delivery, and myopathies and their treatments. A clinical review.

During pregnancy, women undergo physical and physiological changes, which can impact the neuromuscular disease course, but also delivery and fetus health. Generally, there is little impact on the disease course, but sometimes an impairment is noticed, which could be attributed to pregnancy and not to disease progression. Cardiac and respiratory functions have to be assessed at the beginning of pregnancy and a close follow-up is mandatory in case of disorder. Labour and delivery are often impacted. Labour is prolonged because of muscle weakness that is an increased risk of instrumental delivery or Cesarean sections. Patients with myotonic dystrophy are at risk of postpartum hemorrhage. Fetal loss can be associated with fetal disease in myotonic dystrophy, and is at high risk for patients with active inflammatory myopathy only.

Neuropathy and pregnancy: An overview.

Peripheral nerve injuries are rare in pregnant women. Nevertheless, physiological changes linked to pregnancy may induce nerve lesion. In this review we propose to focus on peripheral nerve disorders the most frequently encountered in pregnant patients. Focal neuropathy or polyneuropathy may appear during pregnancy or at delivery. In other cases, pre-existing neuropathies may deteriorate during pregnancy. In addition to clinical description, we summarised management proposed in the literature.

Intravenous immunoglobulin for treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy and multifocal motor neuropathy in France: are daily practices in accordance with guidelines?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) are rare autoimmune diseases. Guidelines were published in 2010 for their diagnosis and treatment. In France, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs) are mainly used for the first-line treatment. The burden of healthcare costs is often underlined but rarely studied. The aim of this survey was to compare to guidelines, the daily practice of French neurologists with IVIGs for CIDP and MMN treatment. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study consisting of an online questionnaire performed between March and May 2014. A total of 49 questionnaires were included, a quarter of which were from neurologists working in neuromuscular reference centers (NRCs). RESULTS: A total of 182 patient case reports were studied. Patients were referred to an NRC for initial diagnosis in approximately 30% of cases in CIDP and 50% of cases in MMN. The initial management of IVIG (frequency, dose and duration) was not different between NRCs and non-NRCs. Guidelines were followed and neurologists were relatively at ease in diagnosing and treating patients. CONCLUSIONS: This was the first national study to describe the implementation of the European Federation of Neurological Sciences/Peripheral Nerve Society guidelines in the daily management of IVIGs in patients with MMN and CIDP in France. Efforts are needed to improve long-term tailored treatment and home treatment to reduce economic costs.

Diagnostic criteria for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A multicentre study of inter-rater variation and sensitivity.

OBJECTIVE: This study assesses inter-rater agreement and sensitivity of diagnostic criteria for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). METHODS: Clinical and electrophysiological data of 399 patients with suspected ALS were collected by eleven experienced physicians from ten different countries. Eight physicians classified patients independently and blinded according to the revised El Escorial Criteria (rEEC) and to the Awaji Criteria (AC). Inter-rater agreement was assessed by Kappa coefficients, sensitivity by majority diagnosis on 350 patients with follow-up data. RESULTS: Inter-rater agreement was generally low both for rEEC and AC. Agreement was best on the categories "Not-ALS", "Definite", and "Probable", and poorest for "Possible" and "Probable Laboratory-supported". Sensitivity was equal for rEEC (64%) and AC (63%), probably due to downgrading of "Probable Laboratory-supported" patients by AC. However, AC was significantly more effective in classifying patients as "ALS" versus "Not-ALS" (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Inter-rater variation is high both for rEEC and for AC probably due to a high complexity of the rEEC inherent in the AC. The gain of AC on diagnostic sensitivity is reduced by the omission of the "Probable Laboratory-supported" category. SIGNIFICANCE: The results highlight a need for initiatives to develop simpler and more reproducible diagnostic criteria for ALS in clinical practice and research.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or not: Keys for the diagnosis.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a degenerative motor neuron disease (MND) which prognosis is poor. Early diagnosis permit to set up immediately adapted treatment and cares. Available diagnostic criteria are based on the detection of both central and peripheral motor neuron injury in bulbar, cervical, thoracic and lumbar regions. Electrodiagnostic (EDX) tests are the key tools to identify peripheral motor neuron involvement. Needle examination records abnormal activities at rest, and looks for neurogenic pattern during muscle contraction. Motor unit potentials morphology is modified primary to recruitment. Motor evoked potentials remain the test of choice to identify impairment of central motor neurons. In the absence of diagnostic biomarker of ALS and among essential investigations of suspected MND, a careful clinical and neurophysiological work-up is essential to rule out the differential diagnosis.

Added value of electromyography in the diagnosis of myopathy: A consensus exercise.

OBJECTIVE: Currently, neurologists may primarily rely on blood biomarkers, muscle biopsy, MRI, and genetics in the diagnostic work-up of suspected myopathy. Using expert consensus as diagnostic reference standard, this study addressed the added value of electrodiagnostic medicine (EDX) in diagnosis of myopathies. METHODS: One hundred ninety-four EDX evaluations of patients with a peer-review consensus diagnosis of myopathy were collected by seven European centres. Each patient was given three different consensus diagnoses: (1) the EDX diagnosis solely based on EDX results, (2) the pure clinical diagnosis based on all available information except EDX results, and (3) the final diagnosis including EDX and all additional information. The myopathies were grouped as muscular dystrophy (45), inflammatory myopathy (46), other aetiology (36) or unknown aetiology (67). RESULTS: Higher diagnostic probabilities for myopathy were seen in the final diagnosis compared to the pure clinical diagnosis (p<0.001). Adding EDX information increased the diagnostic probability of myopathy in 67 patients (34.4%). The greatest increase was seen for myopathies of unknown aetiology. CONCLUSIONS: EDX has a major impact in the diagnosis of myopathies of unknown aetiology. In genetically or biopsy proven myopathies, EDX generally supports the diagnosis. SIGNIFICANCE: EDX is still a useful tool in the diagnostic work-up of most patients with suspected myopathy.

Evaluation of the application of the European guidelines for the diagnosis and clinical care of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients in six French ALS centres.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Our objective was to evaluate the extent to which the 2005 recommendations of the European Federation of Neurological Sciences (EFNS) on the multidisciplinary management of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) are followed in clinical practice. METHODS: This was a multicentre observational study involving six French ALS referral centres receiving prevalent and incident cases. Recommendations were translated into ad hoc questions referring to key aspects of management, and their application was evaluated by a clinical research assistant who independently examined the medical charts (MCs). When necessary, an independent board-certified neurologist answered the questions based on examination of the MC and interview of the caring neurologist. Questions regarding diagnosis and communication were put to patients in a self-administered questionnaire. RESULTS: In all, 376 patients [176 incident, 200 prevalent cases; median age at diagnosis 62.8 years (interquartile range 55.7-72.3); sex ratio 1.37; 27.3% bulbar onset] were included. All the topics covered in the recommendations were evaluated: diagnostic delay (e.g. mean 13.6 months, associated with age and onset); breaking the news (e.g. criteria for communication quality were satisfactory in more than 90%); multidisciplinary and sustained support (e.g. clinic visits were scheduled every 2-3 months in 90%). Also considered were whether riluzole had been offered, symptom management, genetic testing, ventilation, communication defects, enteral nutrition, palliative and end-of-life care. Characteristics associated with poor compliance with some guidelines (schedule of visits, delayed riluzole initiation) were also identified. CONCLUSION: This is the first evaluation of the application of the EFNS recommendations for the management of ALS in a nationwide sample. The results allow us to highlight areas for improvement.

[Review of the current use of rituximab during 4 years in a French university hospital]. / Le rituximab dans la vraie vie: revue d'utilisation du rituximab de 2010 à 2013 au CHU de Saint-Étienne.

PURPOSE: Rituximab is a human/murine chimeric monoclonal antibody primarily used for treating non-Hodgkin's B-cell lymphoma. Recently, it has also been used in the treatment of several autoimmune diseases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients treated at least once with rituximab between 2010 and 2013 in a French university hospital, to provide a panoramic view of rituximab use including FDA or off-labels uses, its efficacy and safety. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients were included with 20 different indications: cryoglobulinemic vasculitis (16%) and anti-PLA2R idiopathic membranous nephropathy (13%) were the most frequent. Rituximab use was off-labels in 50% of cases. Eleven percent of patients experienced severe adverse events, mostly infections. After rituximab, 17% of patients were in complete response (CR), 41% in partial response (PR), and 39% non-responding (NR). Relapse was observed in 65% (33/51) of responding patients. CONCLUSION: Further investigation with randomized controlled trials will provide more insight into the specifics of the role of RTX in the overall management of each disease. Identifying clear objectives and strict outcome measures, associated with long term clinical and biological follow-up would help deciding when, how and in which therapeutic regimen will rituximab most benefit a disease or a patient.

Somatosensory evoked potentials in the assessment of peripheral neuropathies: Commented results of a survey among French-speaking practitioners and recommendations for practice.

BACKGROUND: Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) are increasingly performed for the assessment of peripheral neuropathies, but no practical guidelines have yet been established in this specific application. STUDY AIM: To determine the relevant indication criteria and optimal technical parameters for SSEP recording in peripheral neuropathy investigation. METHODS: A survey was conducted among the French-speaking practitioners with experience of SSEP recording in the context of peripheral neuropathies. The results of the survey were analyzed and discussed to provide recommendations for practice. RESULTS: SSEPs appear to be a second-line test when electroneuromyographic investigation is not sufficiently conclusive, providing complementary and valuable information on central and proximal peripheral conduction in the somatosensory pathways. CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines for a standardized recording protocol, including the various parameters to be measured, are proposed. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: We hope that these proposals will help to recognize the value of this technique in peripheral neuropathy assessment in clinical practice.

Pathophysiology and biomarkers in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathies.

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is an acquired dysimmune disorder characterized by strong heterogeneity in terms of clinical manifestations, prognostic and response to treatment. To date, its pathophysiology and potential target antigens are not totally identified despite substantial progress in the understanding of the involved molecular mechanisms. Recent researches in the field have underlined the importance of cell-mediated immunity (lymphocytesT CD4+, CD8+ and macrophages), the breakdown of blood-nerve barrier, a failure of T-cell regulation, and the disruption of nodal and paranodal organization at the node of Ranvier. This last point is possibly mediated by autoantibodies towards axoglial adhesion molecules which may disrupt sodium and potassium voltage-gated channels clustering leading to a failure of saltatory conduction and the apparition of conduction blocks. The purpose of this article is to overview the main pathophysiologic mechanisms and biomarkers identified in CIDP.

Heterozygous CLCN1 mutations can modulate phenotype in sodium channel myotonia.

Nondystrophic myotonias are characterized by muscle stiffness triggered by voluntary movement. They are caused by mutations in either the CLCN1 gene in myotonia congenita or in the SCN4A gene in paramyotonia congenita and sodium channel myotonias. Clinical and electrophysiological phenotypes of these disorders have been well described. No concomitant mutations in both genes have been reported yet. We report five patients from three families showing myotonia with both chloride and sodium channel mutations. Their clinical and electrophysiological phenotypes did not fit with the phenotype known to be associated with the mutation initially found in SCN4A gene, which led us to screen and find an additional mutation in CLCN1 gene. Our electrophysiological and clinical observations suggest that heterozygous CLCN1 mutations can modify the clinical and electrophysiological expression of SCN4A mutation.