Effectiveness and safety of sofosbuvir-based regimens plus an NS5A inhibitor for patients with HCV genotype 3 infection and cirrhosis. Results of a multicenter real-life cohort.

Patients with HCV genotype 3 (GT3) infection and cirrhosis are currently the most difficult to cure. We report our experience with sofosbuvir+daclatasvir (SOF+DCV) or sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (SOF/LDV), with or without ribavirin (RBV) in clinical practice in this population. This was a multicenter observational study including cirrhotic patients infected by HCV GT3, treated with sofosbuvir plus an NS5A inhibitor (May 2014-October 2015). In total, 208 patients were included: 98 (47%) treatment-experienced, 42 (20%) decompensated and 55 (27%) MELD score >10. In 131 (63%), treatment was SOF+DCV and in 77 (37%), SOF/LDV. Overall, 86% received RBV. RBV addition and extension to 24 weeks was higher in the SOF/LDV group (95% vs 80%, P=.002 and 83% vs 72%, P=.044, respectively). A higher percentage of decompensated patients were treated with DCV than LDV (25% vs 12%, P=.013). Overall, SVR12 was 93.8% (195/208): 94% with SOF+DCV and 93.5% with SOF/LDV. SVR12 was achieved in 90.5% of decompensated patients. Eleven treatment failures: 10 relapses and one breakthrough. RBV addition did not improve SVR (RR: 1.08; P=.919). The single factor associated with failure to achieve SVR was platelet count <75×10E9/mL (RR: 3.50, P=.019). In patients with MELD <10, type of NS5A inhibitor did not impact on SVR12 (94% vs 97%; adjusted RR: 0.49). Thirteen patients (6.3%) had serious adverse events, including three deaths (1.4%) and one therapy discontinuation (0.5%), higher in decompensated patients (16.7% vs 3.6%, P<.006). In patients with GT3 infection and cirrhosis, SVR12 rates were high with both SOF+DCV and SOF/LDV, with few serious adverse events.

Therapy with ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir plus dasabuvir is effective and safe for the treatment of genotypes 1 and 4 hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in patients with severe renal impairment: A multicentre experience.

Limited data are available on direct-acting antivirals for treating hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in patients with severe renal impairment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir (OBV/PTV/r) ± dasabuvir (DSV) ± ribavirin (RBV) in patients with stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) and HCV genotype 1 or 4 infection in real clinical practice, and to investigate pharmacological interactions. This retrospective study included patients treated with OBV/PTV/r+DSV±RBV or OBV/PTV/r+RBV with CKD stage 4 (eGFR: 15-29 mL/min/1.73m2 ) or 5 (eGFR<15 mL/min/1.73m2 or requiring dialysis) and HCV infection by genotypes 1 and 4 between April 2015 and October 2015 in nine Spanish centres. Sustained virological response at 12 weeks (SVR12) was assessed, and clinical and laboratory data, fibrosis stage, adverse events and pharmacological interactions were reported. Forty-six patients were included: 10 (21.7%) had CKD stage 4 and 36 (78.2%) CKD stage 5. Seventeen (36.9%) had cirrhosis. SVR12 rate in the intention-to-treat population was 95.7%. Twenty-one (45.6%) received RBV, which was discontinued in two (9.5%) patients. Anaemia (haemoglobin <10 g/dl) occurred in 12 patients (57.1%) with RBV vs 10 (40.0%) without RBV (P=.246). Renal function remained stable during antiviral therapy. Nine patients (19.5%) experienced serious adverse events unrelated to antiviral therapy. Concomitant medication was discontinued or modified in 41.3% of patients. In conclusion, the effectiveness of OBV/PTV/r±DSV±RBV in patients with CKD 4-5 was similar to that observed in those with normal renal function and was not associated with severe adverse events.

Predictive baseline criteria of primary therapeutic failure in chronic hepatitis C genotype 1.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: more than half of patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C (CHC) do not achieve a sustained viral response (SVR) to current antiviral therapy due to primary non-response, relapse or intolerance. Factors related to each of these unfavorable outcomes are different and the last two may be partially prevented. Our aim was to identify basal criteria to predict the risk of primary failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: we included 251 consecutive patients (152 males) from a single centre, infected with HCV genotype 1 and not previously treated. SVR was achieved in 141 patients and primary failure in 110. RESULTS: high vs. low viral load (> 400,000 IU/mL, OR = 6.17; 95% CI: 2.50-15.23), high serum GGT (> 60 IU/mL, OR = 4.25; 95% CI: 2.49-7.24), low serum cholesterol ( < 178 mg/dL, OR = 2.93; 95% CI: 1.75-4.92) and older age (> 47 yrs., OR = 1.79; 95% CI: 1.08-2.96) were associated to the risk of primary failure in the lineal logistic regression analysis. From the 58 patients carrying all the first three negative criteria, 46 (79.3%) were primary non-responders. CONCLUSIONS: the negative basal profile identified in this study is based on easily available data and provides information about the risk of primary therapeutic failure, and may help to decide whether antiviral therapy should be offered to a single patient.

Predictive baseline criteria of primary therapeutic failure in chronic hepatitis C genotype 1

Background and aims: more than half of patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C (CHC) do not achieve a sustained viral response (SVR) to current antiviral therapy due to primary non-response, relapse or intolerance. Factors related to each of these unfavorable outcomes are different and the last two may be partially prevented. Our aim was to identify basal criteria to predict the risk of primary failure. Patients and methods: we included 251 consecutive patients (152 males) from a single centre, infected with HCV genotype 1 and not previously treated. SVR was achieved in 141 patients and primary failure in 110. Results: high vs. low viral load (> 400,000 IU/mL, OR = 6.17; 95% CI: 2.50-15.23), high serum GGT (> 60 IU/mL, OR = 4.25; 95% CI: 2.49-7.24), low serum cholesterol (< 178 mg/dL, OR = 2.93; 95% CI: 1.75-4.92) and older age (> 47 yrs., OR = 1.79; 95% CI: 1.08-2.96) were associated to the risk of primary failure in the lineal logistic regression analysis. From the 58 patients carrying all the first three negative criteria, 46 (79.3%) were primary non-responders. Conclusions: the negative basal profile identified in this study is based on easily available data and provides information about the risk of primary therapeutic failure, and may help to decide whether antiviral therapy should be offered to a single patient(AU)

Oscillations in serum ferritin associated with antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND: Hyperferritinemia is often found in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) and is predictive of poorer response to antiviral therapy. OBJECTIVE: To investigate changes in ferritinemia during and after antiviral therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: serum ferritin levels were measured in 262 CHC patients (163 males, mean age 48.5 years +/- 10.1) before and during antiviral therapy, and six months post-treatment in all 154 patients with undetectable serum HCV-RNA after therapy completion. RESULTS: Baseline serum ferritin was higher in patients with primary therapeutic failure than in those reaching sustained viral response (330 +/- 291 ng/mL vs. 211 +/- 192 ng/mL, p = 0.002). Serum ferritin transiently increased during therapy from baseline (257 +/- 242 ng/mL vs. 875 +/- 630 ng/mL, p < 0.001). Six months after finishing therapy, serum ferritin decreased under baseline values both in sustained responders (117 +/- 102 ng/mL vs. 211+/- 192 ng/mL, p < 0.001) and, to a lesser extent, in relapsers (217 +/- 174 ng/mL vs. 257 +/- 221 ng/mL, p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline serum ferritin may predict response to antiviral treatment in chronic hepatitis C. Combined antiviral therapy induces a marked increase in serum ferritin that falls below baseline values after sustained viral response, suggesting that the cause of hyperferritinemia in many patients is HCV infection itself rather than iron overload.

Oscilaciones de la ferritina sérica asociadas al tratamiento antiviral en la hepatitis crónica por virus C / Oscillations in serum ferritin associated with antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis C

Antecedentes: la hiperferritinemia es frecuente en los enfermoscon hepatitis crónica C (HCC) y reduce las probabilidades derespuesta al tratamiento antiviral.Objetivo: investigar las variaciones de la ferritina sérica durantey después del tratamiento y su relación con la respuesta al mismo.Pacientes y métodos: la ferritina sérica se ha medido en262 enfermos con HCC (163 hombres, edad media 48,5 años ±10,1) antes y durante el tratamiento antiviral, y a los 6 meses definalizado en los 154 enfermos con viremia indetectable al finaldel tratamiento.Resultados: la ferritina sérica basal era más alta en enfermoscon fracaso terapéutico primario que en los que consiguieron respuestaviral sostenida (RVS) (330 ± 291 ng/ml vs. 211 ± 192ng/ml, p = 0,002). La ferritina sérica aumentó transitoriamentedurante el tratamiento (257 ± 242 ng/ml vs. 875 ± 630 ng/ml, p< 0,001). La ferritina sérica descendió a valores inferiores a losbasales seis meses después de finalizado el tratamiento en los pacientescon RVS (117 ± 102 ng/ml vs. 211± 192 ng/ml, p <0,001) y, en menor grado, en los que sufrieron recidiva viral (217± 174 ng/ml vs. 257 ± 221 ng/m, p = 0,047).Conclusiones: una ferritina sérica basal elevada se asocia conmayor riesgo de fracaso terapéutico en la HCC. El tratamientoantiviral induce un marcado incremento de la ferritina sérica quevuelve a valores por debajo de los basales en los enfermos que obtienenRVS. Esto sugiere que la causa de hiperferritinemia en lamayoría de los enfermos es la propia infección por VHC y no lasobrecarga de hierro(AU)

Background: hyperferritinemia is often found in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) and is predictive of poorer response to antiviral therapy. Objective: to investigate changes in ferritinemia during and after antiviral therapy. Patients and methods: serum ferritin levels were measured in 262 CHC patients (163 males, mean age 48.5 years ± 10.1) before and during antiviral therapy, and six months post-treatment in all 154 patients whit undetectable serum HCV-RNA after therapy completion. Results: baseline serum ferritin was higher in patients with primary therapeutic failure than in those reaching sustained viral response (330 ± 291 ng/mL vs. 211 ± 192 ng/mL, p = 0.002). Serum ferritin transiently increased during therapy from baseline (257 ± 242 ng/mL vs. 875 ± 630 ng/mL, p < 0.001). Six months after finishing therapy, serum ferritin decreased under baseline values both in sustained responders (117 ± 102 ng/mL vs. 211± 192 ng/mL, p < 0.001) and, to a lesser extent, in relapsers (217 ± 174 ng/mL vs. 257 ± 221 ng/mL, p = 0.047). Conclusions: baseline serum ferritin may predict response to antiviral treatment in chronic hepatitis C. Combined antiviral therapy induces a marked increase in serum ferritin that falls below baseline values after sustained viral response, suggesting that the cause of hyperferritinemia in many patients is HCV infection itself rather than iron overload(AU)

[Results of the treatment of chronic hepatitis C genotype 4--a comparative analysis with genotype 1]. / Resultados del tratamiento de la hepatitis crónica por VHC genotipo 4. Un análisis comparativo con el genotipo 1.

INTRODUCTION: nearly all the data on the efficacy of combined antiviral therapy on chronic hepatitis C genotype 4 have been obtained in countries of Middle East. Genotype 4 is quite unusual in Spain. We report our experience in a group of Spanish patients treated with homogeneous criteria. PATIENTS AND METHODS: between 2001 and 2007 we have treated 30 patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 4 (20 males) with pegylated Interferon alpha-2b (26 cases) or alpha-2a (4 cases) combined with ribavirin at a weight-adjusted dose. Results of therapy are known in all patients and liver biopsy is available in 24 cases. RESULTS: ten patients (33.3%) obtained sustained viral response (SVR: HCV-RNA undetectable in blood 6 months after the end of therapy), 12 were primary non-responders, 4 relapsed after reaching undetectable HCV-RNA at the end of therapy and 4 interrupted the treatment due to severe adverse events. These results are very close to those obtained in 355 patients infected with HCV genotype 1. CONCLUSION: HCV genotype 4 should be considered as "difficult to treat". The better results of therapy in other geographical areas (Middle East) may be due to a different distribution of the subtypes of HCV genotype 4.