Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 52
Filtrar
1.
JMIR Public Health Surveill ; 10: e40792, 2024 May 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38709551

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A comprehensive description of the combined effect of SARS-CoV-2 and respiratory viruses other than SARS-CoV-2 (ORVs) on acute respiratory infection (ARI) hospitalizations is lacking. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the viral etiology of ARI hospitalizations before the pandemic (8 prepandemic influenza seasons, 2012-13 to 2019-20) and during 3 pandemic years (periods of increased SARS-CoV-2 and ORV circulation in 2020-21, 2021-22, and 2022-23) from an active hospital-based surveillance network in Quebec, Canada. METHODS: We compared the detection of ORVs and SARS-CoV-2 during 3 pandemic years to that in 8 prepandemic influenza seasons among patients hospitalized with ARI who were tested systematically by the same multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay during periods of intense respiratory virus (RV) circulation. The proportions of infections between prepandemic and pandemic years were compared by using appropriate statistical tests. RESULTS: During prepandemic influenza seasons, overall RV detection was 92.7% (1384/1493) (respiratory syncytial virus [RSV]: 721/1493, 48.3%; coinfections: 456/1493, 30.5%) in children (<18 years) and 62.8% (2723/4339) (influenza: 1742/4339, 40.1%; coinfections: 264/4339, 6.1%) in adults. Overall RV detection in children was lower during pandemic years but increased from 58.6% (17/29) in 2020-21 (all ORVs; coinfections: 7/29, 24.1%) to 90.3% (308/341) in 2021-22 (ORVs: 278/341, 82%; SARS-CoV-2: 30/341, 8.8%; coinfections: 110/341, 32.3%) and 88.9% (361/406) in 2022-23 (ORVs: 339/406, 84%; SARS-CoV-2: 22/406, 5.4%; coinfections: 128/406, 31.5%). In adults, overall RV detection was also lower during pandemic years but increased from 43.7% (333/762) in 2020-21 (ORVs: 26/762, 3.4%; SARS-CoV-2: 307/762, 40.3%; coinfections: 7/762, 0.9%) to 57.8% (731/1265) in 2021-22 (ORVs: 179/1265, 14.2%; SARS-CoV-2: 552/1265, 43.6%; coinfections: 42/1265, 3.3%) and 50.1% (746/1488) in 2022-23 (ORVs: 409/1488, 27.5%; SARS-CoV-2: 337/1488, 22.6%; coinfections: 36/1488, 2.4%). No influenza or RSV was detected in 2020-21; however, their detection increased in the 2 subsequent years but did not reach prepandemic levels. Compared to the prepandemic period, the peaks of RSV hospitalization shifted in 2021-22 (16 weeks earlier) and 2022-23 (15 weeks earlier). Moreover, the peaks of influenza hospitalization shifted in 2021-22 (17 weeks later) and 2022-23 (4 weeks earlier). Age distribution was different compared to the prepandemic period, especially during the first pandemic year. CONCLUSIONS: Significant shifts in viral etiology, seasonality, and age distribution of ARI hospitalizations occurred during the 3 pandemic years. Changes in age distribution observed in our study may reflect modifications in the landscape of circulating RVs and their contribution to ARI hospitalizations. During the pandemic period, SARS-CoV-2 had a low contribution to pediatric ARI hospitalizations, while it was the main contributor to adult ARI hospitalizations during the first 2 seasons and dropped below ORVs during the third pandemic season. Evolving RVs epidemiology underscores the need for increased scrutiny of ARI hospitalization etiology to inform tailored public health recommendations.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Hospitalização , Infecções Respiratórias , Humanos , Quebeque/epidemiologia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Infecções Respiratórias/virologia , Criança , Adulto , Adolescente , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Masculino , Idoso , Pré-Escolar , Lactente , Adulto Jovem , SARS-CoV-2 , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Recém-Nascido , Pandemias
2.
Can Commun Dis Rep ; 50(1-2): 63-76, 2024 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38655241

RESUMO

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity is influenced by multiple factors, such as age, underlying medical conditions, individual immunity, infecting variant, and clinical practice. The highly transmissible Omicron variants resulted in decreased COVID-19 screening capacity, which limited disease severity surveillance. Objective: To report on the temporal evolution of disease severity among patients admitted to Québec hospitals due to COVID-19 between January 2, 2022, and April 23, 2022, which corresponded to the peak period of hospitalizations due to Omicron. Methods: Retrospective population-based cohort study of all hospital admissions due to COVID-19 in Québec, between January 2, 2022, and April 23, 2022. Study period was divided into four-week periods, corresponding roughly to January, February, March and April. Regression using Cox and Poisson generalized estimating equations (GEEs) was used to quantify temporal variations in length of stay and risk of complications (intensive care admission or in-hospital death) through time, using the Omicron peak (January 2022) as reference. Measures were adjusted for age, sex, vaccination status, presence of chronic diseases, and clustering by hospital. Results: During the study period, 9,178 of all 18,272 (50.2%) patients hospitalized with a COVID-19 diagnosis were admitted due to COVID-19. Of these, 1,026 (11.2%) were admitted to intensive care and 1,523 (16.6%) died. Compared to January, the risk of intensive care admission was 25% and 31% lower in March and April respectively, while in-hospital fatality continuously decreased by 45% lower in April. The average length of stay was temporarily lower in March (9%). Conclusion: Severity of admissions due to COVID-19 decreased in the first months of 2022, when predominant circulating variants were considered to be of similar severity. Monitoring hospital admissions due to COVID-19 can contribute to disease severity surveillance.

3.
Microbiol Spectr ; 12(6): e0022524, 2024 Jun 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38687067

RESUMO

The detection of Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI) relies on testing the stool of patients by toxin antigen detection or PCR methods. Although PCR and antigenic methods have significantly reduced the time to results, delays in stool collection can significantly add to the turnaround time. The use of rectal swabs to detect C. difficile could considerably reduce the time to diagnosis of CDI. We developed a new rapid PCR assay for the detection of C. difficile and evaluated this PCR assay on both stool and rectal swab specimens. We recruited a total of 623 patients suspected of C. difficile infection. Stool samples and rectal swabs were collected from each patient and tested by our PCR assay. Stool samples were also tested by the cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CCNA) as a reference. The PCR assay detected C. difficile in 60 stool specimens and 61 rectal swabs for the 64 patients whose stool samples were positive for C. difficile by CCNA. The PCR assay detected an additional 35 and 36 stool and rectal swab specimens positive for C. difficile, respectively, for sensitivity with stools and rectal swabs of 93.8% and 95.3%, specificity of 93.7% and 93.6%, positive predictive values of 63.2% and 62.9%, and negative predictive values of 99.2% and 99.4%. Detection of C. difficile using PCR on stools or rectal swabs yielded reliable and similar results. The use of PCR tests on rectal swabs could reduce turnaround time for CDI detection, thus improving CDI management and control of C. difficile transmission. IMPORTANCE: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is the leading cause of healthcare-associated diarrhea, resulting in high morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. In clinical laboratories, CDI testing is currently performed on stool samples collected from patients with diarrhea. However, the diagnosis of CDI can be delayed by the time required to collect stool samples. Barriers to sample collection could be overcome by using a rectal swab instead of a stool sample. Our study showed that CDI can be identified rapidly and reliably by a new PCR assay developed in our laboratory on both stool and rectal swab specimens. The use of PCR tests on rectal swabs could reduce the time for the detection of CDI and improve the management of this infection. It should also provide a useful alternative for infection-control practitioners to better control the spread of C. difficile.


Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium , Fezes , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Reto , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Humanos , Fezes/microbiologia , Clostridioides difficile/isolamento & purificação , Clostridioides difficile/genética , Infecções por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Infecções por Clostridium/microbiologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Reto/microbiologia , Feminino , Masculino , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Manejo de Espécimes/métodos , Adulto , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais
4.
Clin Infect Dis ; 78(3): 765-774, 2024 03 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37819010

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Influenza immunization programs aim to reduce the risk and burden of severe outcomes. To inform optimal program strategies, we monitored influenza hospitalizations over 7 seasons, stratified by age, comorbidity, and vaccination status. METHODS: We assembled data from 4 hospitals involved in an active surveillance network with systematic collection of nasal samples and polymerase chain reaction testing for influenza virus in all patients admitted through the emergency department with acute respiratory infection during the 2012-2013 to 2018-2019 influenza seasons in Quebec, Canada. We estimated seasonal, population-based incidence of influenza-associated hospitalizations by subtype predominance, age, comorbidity, and vaccine status, and derived the number needed to vaccinate to prevent 1 hospitalization per stratum. RESULTS: The average seasonal incidence of influenza-associated hospitalization was 89/100 000 (95% confidence interval, 86-93), lower during A(H1N1) (49-82/100 000) than A(H3N2) seasons (73-143/100 000). Overall risk followed a J-shaped age pattern, highest among infants 0-5 months and adults ≥75 years old. Hospitalization risks were highest for children <5 years old during A(H1N1) but for highest adults aged ≥75 years during A(H3N2) seasons. Age-adjusted hospitalization risks were 7-fold higher among individuals with versus without comorbid conditions (214 vs 30/100 000, respectively). The number needed to vaccinate to prevent hospitalization was 82-fold lower for ≥75-years-olds with comorbid conditions (n = 1995), who comprised 39% of all hospitalizations, than for healthy 18-64-year-olds (n = 163 488), who comprised just 6% of all hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of broad-based influenza immunization programs (targeted or universal), severe outcome risks should be simultaneously examined by subtype, age, comorbidity, and vaccine status. Policymakers require such detail to prioritize promotional efforts and expenditures toward the greatest and most efficient program impact.


Assuntos
Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1 , Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana , Adulto , Lactente , Criança , Humanos , Pré-Escolar , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Estações do Ano , Quebeque/epidemiologia , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H3N2 , Hospitalização , Comorbidade , Vacinação
5.
Lancet Healthy Longev ; 4(8): e409-e420, 2023 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37459879

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Older adults (aged ≥60 years) were prioritised for COVID-19 booster vaccination due to severe outcome risk, but the risk for this group is also affected by previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination. We estimated vaccine effectiveness against omicron-associated hospitalisation in older adults by previously documented infection, time since last immunological event, and age group. METHODS: This was a population-based test-negative case-control study done in Quebec, Canada, during BA.1 dominant (December, 2021, to March, 2022), BA.2 dominant (April to June, 2022), and BA.4/5 dominant (July to November, 2022) periods using provincial laboratory, immunisation, hospitalisation, and chronic disease surveillance databases. We included older adults (aged ≥60 years) with symptoms associated with COVID-19 who were tested for SARS-CoV-2 in acute-care hospitals. Cases were defined as patients who were hospitalised for COVID-19 within 14 days after testing positive; controls were patients who tested negative. Analyses spanned 3-14 months after last vaccine dose or previous infection. Logistic regression models compared COVID-19 hospitalisation risk by mRNA vaccine dose and previous infection versus unvaccinated and infection-naive participants. FINDINGS: Between Dec 26, 2021, and Nov 5, 2022, we included 174 819 specimens (82 870 [47·4%] from men and 91 949 [52·6%] from women; from 8455 cases and 166 364 controls), taken from 2951 cases and 48 724 controls in the BA.1 period; 1897 cases and 41 702 controls in the BA.2 period; and 3607 cases and 75 938 controls in the BA.4/5 period. In participants who were infection naive, vaccine effectiveness against hospitalisation improved with dose number, consistent with a shorter median time since last dose, but decreased with more recent omicron subvariants. Four-dose vaccine effectiveness was 96% (95% CI 93-98) during the BA.1 period, 84% (81-87) during the BA.2 period, and 68% (63-72) during the BA.4/5 period. Regardless of dose number (two to five doses) or timing since previous infection, hybrid protection was more than 90%, persisted for at least 6-8 months, and did not decline with age. INTERPRETATION: Older adults with both previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and two or more vaccine doses appear to be well protected for a prolonged period against hospitalisation due to omicron subvariants, including BA.4/5. Ensuring that older adults who are infection naive remain up to date with vaccination might reduce COVID-19 hospitalisations most efficiently. FUNDING: Ministère de la Santé et des Services Sociaux du Québec. TRANSLATION: For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Vacinas , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Quebeque/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2 , Hospitalização
6.
J Multimorb Comorb ; 13: 26335565231169567, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37143739

RESUMO

Background: Comorbidities are important risk factors of severe COVID-19 complications. Their impact during the Omicron wave among vaccinated and unvaccinated COVID-19 cases is not well documented. Purpose: The objective of this study was to estimate the association between the number of comorbidities and the risk of hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and death among vaccinated and unvaccinated confirmed adult COVID-19 cases during the Omicron wave. Research Design and Study sample: We performed a cohort study of COVID-19 adult cases of primo-infection occurring during the Omicron wave, from December 5, 2021 to January 9, 2022 using surveillance database of the province of Québec, Canada. The database included all laboratory-confirmed cases in the province and the related information on 21 pre-existing comorbidities, hospitalization, ICU admission, death related to COVID-19 and vaccination status. Analysis: We performed a robust Poisson regression model to estimate the impact of the number of comorbidities on each complication by vaccination status adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic status, and living environment. Results: We observed that the risk of complication increased for each additional comorbidity in both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals and that this risk was systematically higher among unvaccinated individuals. Compared with vaccinated individuals without comorbidities (reference group), the risks of hospitalization, ICU admission, and death were respectively: 9X (95% CI [7.77-12.01]), 13X (95% CI [8.74-18.87]), and 12X (95% CI [7.57-18.91]) higher in vaccinated individuals with ≥3 comorbidities; 22X (95% CI [19.07-25.95]), 45X (95% CI [29.06-69.67]) and 38X (95% CI [23.62-61.14]) higher in unvaccinated individuals with ≥3 comorbidities. Conclusion: Our results support the importance of promoting vaccination in all individuals, and especially those with pre-existing medical conditions, to reduce severe complications, even during the Omicron wave.

7.
Lancet Reg Health Am ; 19: 100448, 2023 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36852331

RESUMO

Background: Respiratory viruses have been previously suspected to trigger invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD). After progressive non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI) lifting, an unusual RSV outbreak has been observed in the Fall 2021, raising concerns about the possible consequences on IPD. We aimed to analyse the evolution of IPD incidence across age-groups since NPI lifting, and its temporal association with respiratory viral infections. Methods: We conducted a time-series analysis using 1) population-based IPD surveillance data and 2) statistics from the laboratory surveillance network of respiratory viruses in the province of Quebec, Canada, from January 2013 to January 2022. The monthly IPD incidence was analysed by quasi-Poisson regression models across age-groups. The fraction of IPD incidence change potentially attributable to different viruses in 2021-2022 was estimated. Findings: A total of 7712 IPD cases were included. After a major decrease in IPD incidence from April 2020, IPD rate started to increase in <5-year-old children in October 2021, exceeding the pre-NPI trend (+62%). This was temporally associated with an unusual surge in RSV cases (+53% versus pre-NPI trend). During this 2021-22 surge, the fraction of IPD attributable to RSV dynamics in children was 77% (95% CI [33-100]). By contrast, the IPD incidence in older age-groups remained low, and was temporally associated with influenza dynamics. Interpretation: These results provide new evidence on the role of respiratory viruses in driving IPD dynamics, with possible differences between children and adults. In the coming future, the potential benefit of interventions targeting RSV, such as vaccines, for IPD prevention should be considered. Funding: The study was supported by a grant from the Quebec Ministry of Health and Social Services ('ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux du Québec'). Publication was supported by a grant from "Fondation de l'Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris et de l'Alliance « Tous Unis contre le Virus ¼ (Fondation de France/Institut Pasteur/APHP)". N.O. was supported by the ESPID (European Society of Pediatric Infectious Diseases) 2021-2023 Fellowship Award and the 2022 ISPPD (International Symposium on Pneumococci and Pneumococcal Diseases) Robert Austrian Research award.

8.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 23(1): 45-55, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36152671

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data on vaccine-induced or infection-induced (hybrid or natural) immunity against omicron (B.1.1.529) subvariant BA.2, particularly in comparing the effects of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection with the same or different genetic lineage. We aimed to estimate the protection against omicron BA.2 associated with previous primary infection with omicron BA.1 or pre-omicron SARS-CoV-2, among health-care workers with and without mRNA vaccination. METHODS: We conducted a test-negative case-control study among health-care workers aged 18 years or older who were tested for SARS-CoV-2 in Quebec, Canada, between March 27 and June 4, 2022, when BA.2 was the predominant variant and was presumptively diagnosed with a positive test result. We identified cases (positive test during study period) and controls (negative test during study period) using the provincial laboratory database that records all nucleic acid amplification testing for SARS-CoV-2 in Quebec, and used the provincial immunisation registry to determine vaccination status. Logistic regression models compared the likelihood of BA.2 infection or reinfection (second positive test ≥30 days after primary infection) among health-care workers who had previous primary infection and none to three mRNA vaccine doses versus unvaccinated health-care workers with no primary infection. FINDINGS: 258 007 SARS-CoV-2 tests were done during the study period. Among those with a valid result and that met the inclusion criteria, there were 37 732 presumed BA.2 cases (2521 [6·7%] reinfections following pre-omicron primary infection and 659 [1·7%] reinfections following BA.1 primary infection) and 73 507 controls (7360 [10·0%] had pre-omicron primary infection and 12 315 [16·8%] had BA.1 primary infection). Pre-omicron primary infection was associated with a 38% (95% CI 19-53) reduction in BA.2 infection risk, with higher BA.2 protection among those who had also received one (56%, 95% CI 47-63), two (69%, 64-73), or three (70%, 66-74) mRNA vaccine doses. Omicron BA.1 primary infection was associated with greater protection against BA.2 infection (risk reduction of 72%, 95% CI 65-78), and protection was increased further among those who had received two doses of mRNA vaccine (96%, 95-96), but was not improved with a third dose (96%, 95-97). INTERPRETATION: Health-care workers who had received two doses of mRNA vaccine and had previous BA.1 infection were subsequently well protected for a prolonged period against BA.2 reinfection, with a third vaccine dose conferring no improvement to that hybrid protection. If this protection also pertains to future variants, there might be limited benefit from additional vaccine doses for people with hybrid immunity, depending on timing and variant. FUNDING: Ministère de la Santé et des Services Sociaux du Québec.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Reinfecção , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Vacinação
9.
JAMA Netw Open ; 5(10): e2236670, 2022 10 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36239934

RESUMO

Importance: The Omicron variant is phylogenetically and antigenically distinct from earlier SARS-CoV-2 variants and the original vaccine strain. Protection conferred by prior SARS-CoV-2 infection against Omicron reinfection, with and without vaccination, requires quantification. Objective: To estimate the protection against Omicron reinfection and hospitalization conferred by prior heterologous non-Omicron SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or up to 3 doses of an ancestral, Wuhan-like messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine. Design, Setting, and Participants: This test-negative, population-based case-control study was conducted between December 26, 2021, and March 12, 2022, and included community-dwelling individuals aged 12 years or older who were tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection in the province of Quebec, Canada. Exposures: Prior laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection with or without mRNA vaccination. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 reinfection and associated hospitalization, presumed to be associated with the Omicron variant according to genomic surveillance. The odds of prior infection with or without vaccination were compared for case participants with Omicron infection and associated hospitalizations vs test-negative control participants. Estimated protection was derived as 1 - the odds ratio, adjusted for age, sex, testing indication, and epidemiologic week. Analyses were stratified by severity and time since last non-Omicron infection or vaccine dose. Results: This study included 696 439 individuals (224 007 case participants and 472 432 control participants); 62.2% and 63.9% were female and 87.4% and 75.5% were aged 18 to 69 years, respectively. Prior non-Omicron SARS-CoV-2 infection was detected for 9505 case participants (4.2%) and 29 712 control participants (6.3%). Among nonvaccinated individuals, prior non-Omicron infection was associated with a 44% reduction (95% CI, 38%-48%) in Omicron reinfection risk, which decreased from 66% (95% CI, 57%-73%) at 3 to 5 months to 35% (95% CI, 21%-47%) at 9 to 11 months postinfection and was below 30% thereafter. The more severe the prior infection, the greater the risk reduction. Estimated protection (95% CI) against Omicron infection was consistently significantly higher among vaccinated individuals with prior infection compared with vaccinated infection-naive individuals, with 65% (63%-67%) vs 20% (16%-24%) for 1 dose, 68% (67%-70%) vs 42% (41%-44%) for 2 doses, and 83% (81%-84%) vs 73% (72%-73%) for 3 doses. For individuals with prior infection, estimated protection (95% CI) against Omicron-associated hospitalization was 81% (66%-89%) and increased to 86% (77%-99%) with 1, 94% (91%-96%) with 2, and 97% (94%-99%) with 3 mRNA vaccine doses, without signs of waning. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that vaccination with 2 or 3 mRNA vaccine doses among individuals with prior heterologous SARS-CoV-2 infection provided the greatest protection against Omicron-associated hospitalization. In the context of program goals to prevent severe outcomes and preserve health care system capacity, a third mRNA vaccine dose may add limited protection in twice-vaccinated individuals with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Vacinas Virais , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Quebeque/epidemiologia , RNA Mensageiro , Reinfecção/epidemiologia , Reinfecção/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Vacinas Sintéticas , Vacinas de mRNA
10.
Can Commun Dis Rep ; 48(4): 164-169, 2022 Apr 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35480704

RESUMO

Background: Residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs) and private residences for seniors (PRSs) were given priority for vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Given the shortage of vaccine in the winter of 2021, the Comité sur l'immunisation du Québec recommended postponing the administration of second doses to ensure more rapid and widespread administration of first doses. The objective of this study was to measure the impact of first-dose vaccination on 1) the incidence of cases and complications in LTCFs and PRSs and 2) the frequency of outbreaks in LTCFs. Methods: In this ecological study, COVID-19 incidence and complications in residents of LTCFs and PRSs in Québec were compared with the general (community) population at a point in time when there was still only limited eligibility for vaccination. Results: After vaccination in LTCFs, the incidence rate of COVID-19 decreased by 92% compared with 49% in the community, and deaths decreased by 95%. By six weeks post-vaccination, almost no facility reported five or more cases per 100 beds per week. The incidence rate decreased by 91% in PRSs compared with 2% in the community. Hospitalizations and deaths in PRSs decreased by 94% and 90%, respectively. Conclusion: As a result of 1) vaccination of residents with one dose, 2) natural immunity already acquired in LTCFs and PRSs, 3) vaccination of healthcare workers and 4) other non-pharmaceutical prevention measures implemented, the circulation of the coronavirus in these settings was largely interrupted.

11.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(11): 1980-1992, 2022 11 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35438175

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Canadian coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) immunization strategy deferred second doses and allowed mixed schedules. We compared 2-dose vaccine effectiveness (VE) by vaccine type (mRNA and/or ChAdOx1), interval between doses, and time since second dose in 2 of Canada's larger provinces. METHODS: Two-dose VE against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection or hospitalization among adults ≥18 years, including due to Alpha, Gamma, and Delta variants of concern (VOCs), was assessed ≥14 days postvaccination by test-negative design studies separately conducted in British Columbia and Quebec, Canada, between 30 May and 27 November (epi-weeks 22-47) 2021. RESULTS: In both provinces, all homologous or heterologous mRNA and/or ChAdOx1 2-dose schedules were associated with ≥90% reduction in SARS-CoV-2 hospitalization risk for ≥7 months. With slight decline from a peak of >90%, VE against infection was ≥80% for ≥6 months following homologous mRNA vaccination, lower by ∼10% when both doses were ChAdOx1 but comparably high following heterologous ChAdOx1 + mRNA receipt. Findings were similar by age group, sex, and VOC. VE was significantly higher with longer 7-8-week versus manufacturer-specified 3-4-week intervals between mRNA doses. CONCLUSIONS: Two doses of any mRNA and/or ChAdOx1 combination gave substantial and sustained protection against SARS-CoV-2 hospitalization, spanning Delta-dominant circulation. ChAdOx1 VE against infection was improved by heterologous mRNA series completion. A 7-8-week interval between first and second doses improved mRNA VE and may be the optimal schedule outside periods of intense epidemic surge. Findings support interchangeability and extended intervals between SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses, with potential global implications for low-coverage areas and, going forward, for children.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Colúmbia Britânica/epidemiologia , Quebeque/epidemiologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Eficácia de Vacinas , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , RNA Mensageiro
12.
BMJ Open ; 12(3): e060295, 2022 03 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35256449

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To study the association between polypharmacy and the risk of hospitalisation and death in cases of COVID-19 in the population over the age of 65. DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. SETTING: Quebec Integrated Chronic Disease Surveillance System, composed of five medico-administrative databases, in the province of Quebec, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: 32 476 COVID-19 cases aged over 65 whose diagnosis was made between 23 February 2020 and 15 March 2021, and who were covered by the public drug insurance plan (thus excluding those living in long-term care). We counted the number of different medications they claimed between 1 April 2019 and 31 March 2020. OUTCOME MEASURES: Robust Poisson regression was used to calculate relative risk of hospitalisation and death associated with the use of multiple medications, adjusting for age, sex, chronic conditions, material and social deprivation and living environment. RESULTS: Of the 32 476 COVID-19 cases included, 10 350 (32%) were hospitalised and 4146 (13%) died. Compared with 0-4 medications, polypharmacy exposure was associated with increased hospitalisations, with relative risks ranging from 1.11 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.19) for those using 5-9 medications to 1.62 (95% CI 1.51 to 1.75) for those using 20+. Similarly, the risk of death increased with the number of medications, from 1.13 (95% CI 0.99 to 1.30) for those using (5-9 medications to 1.97 (95% CI 1.70 to 2.27) (20+). Increased risk was mainly observed in younger groups. CONCLUSIONS: Polypharmacy was significantly associated with the risk of hospitalisations and deaths related to COVID-19 in this cohort of older adults. Polypharmacy may represent a marker of vulnerability, especially for younger groups of older adults.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Polimedicação , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Hospitalização , Humanos , Quebeque/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2
13.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(1): e805-e813, 2022 08 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34460902

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In Canada, first and second doses of messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) were uniquely spaced 16 weeks apart. We estimated 1- and 2-dose mRNA vaccine effectiveness (VE) among healthcare workers (HCWs) in Québec, Canada, including protection against varying outcome severity, variants of concern (VOCs), and the stability of single-dose protection up to 16 weeks postvaccination. METHODS: A test-negative design compared vaccination among SARS-CoV-2 test-positive and weekly matched (10:1), randomly sampled, test-negative HCWs using linked surveillance and immunization databases. Vaccine status was defined by 1 dose ≥14 days or 2 doses ≥7 days before illness onset or specimen collection. Adjusted VE was estimated by conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Primary analysis included 5316 cases and 53 160 controls. Single-dose VE was 70% (95% confidence interval [CI], 68%-73%) against SARS-CoV-2 infection; 73% (95% CI, 71%-75%) against illness; and 97% (95% CI, 92%-99%) against hospitalization. Two-dose VE was 86% (95% CI, 81%-90%) and 93% (95% CI, 89%-95%), respectively, with no hospitalizations. VE was higher for non-VOCs than VOCs (73% Alpha) among single-dose recipients but not 2-dose recipients. Across 16 weeks, no decline in single-dose VE was observed, with appropriate stratification based upon prioritized vaccination determined by higher vs lower likelihood of direct patient contact. CONCLUSIONS: One mRNA vaccine dose provided substantial and sustained protection to HCWs extending at least 4 months postvaccination. In circumstances of vaccine shortage, delaying the second dose may be a pertinent public health strategy.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Canadá , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Quebeque/epidemiologia , RNA Mensageiro , Vacinas Sintéticas , Vacinas de mRNA
14.
J Infect Dis ; 223(6): 1078-1087, 2021 03 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32761209

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Few data exist concerning the role of common human coronaviruses (HCoVs) in patients hospitalized for acute respiratory infection (ARI) and the severity of these infections compared with influenza. METHODS: Prospective data on the viral etiology of ARI hospitalizations during the peaks of 8 influenza seasons (from 2011-2012 to 2018-2019) in Quebec, Canada, were used to compare patients with HCoV and those with influenza infections; generalized estimation equations models were used for multivariate analyses. RESULTS: We identified 340 HCoV infections, which affected 11.6% of children (n = 136) and 5.2% of adults (n = 204) hospitalized with ARI. The majority of children (75%) with HCoV infections were also coinfected with other respiratory viruses, compared with 24% of the adults (P < .001). No deaths were recorded in children; 5.8% of adults with HCoV monoinfection died, compared with 4.2% of those with influenza monoinfection (P = .23). The risk of pneumonia was nonsignificantly lower in children with HCoV than in those with influenza, but these risks were similarly high in adults. Markers of severity (length of stay, intensive care unit admissions, and case-fatality ratio) were comparable between these infections in multivariate analyses, in both children and adults. CONCLUSIONS: In children and adults hospitalized with ARI, HCoV infections were less frequent than influenza infections, but were as severe as influenza monoinfections.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus , Influenza Humana , Infecções Respiratórias , Adulto , Criança , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Hospitalização , Hospitais , Humanos , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Quebeque/epidemiologia , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Infecções Respiratórias/virologia , Estações do Ano
15.
Prev Med Rep ; 20: 101180, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32953425

RESUMO

In Quebec, Canada, eligibility for palivizumab (PVZ) immunoprophylaxis was expanded in fall 2016 to include healthy-full-term (HFT) infants residing in the circumpolar region of Nunavik and aged <3 months at the start of the RSV season or born during the season. This study assessed the effectiveness of PVZ to prevent RSV hospitalizations in these infants during the 3 seasons following its implementation. Medical and laboratory records of <1-year-old infants (375 average annual birth cohort) admitted to regional and tertiary hospitals with respiratory infection during 6 years were reviewed. Individual pharmacy data and birth registries were used to estimate adherence to PVZ and direct PVZ effectiveness in 0-5-month-old HFT infants by comparing the incidence of RSV hospitalizations 1) in protected and unprotected infants, and 2) during PVZ-protected and unprotected days. Over six seasons, the RSV hospitalization rate was 50.2/1000 (72.6/1000 adjusted for underdetection) in <1-year-old infants. PVZ was administered to 73% (469) of eligible HFT infants; 37% (237) received all recommended doses. Overall for the three RSV seasons the incidence of RSV hospitalization in PVZ-protected infants was similar to PVZ-unprotected infants, resulting in PVZ direct effectiveness of -6.7% (95% CI -174.8%, 85.6%). The incidence of RSV hospitalization during PVZ-protected and during PVZ-unprotected days was also similar, resulting in PVZ direct effectiveness of -3.8% (CI -167.6%, 64.9%). Over three RSV seasons, there was no evidence that PVZ reduced RSV hospitalizations in HFT Nunavik infants. In addition, the sub-optimal adherence to the recommended PVZ administration schedule suggests feasibility and acceptability issues.

16.
Can J Public Health ; 111(6): 1041-1048, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32529553

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: In Quebec, three pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV) were used sequentially starting in December 2004. The objective of the study was to investigate the association between exposure to different PCV regimens and hospitalizations for lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI). METHODS: Records with a main diagnosis of LRTI in children born in 2000-2012 and observed up to their second birthday were extracted from the provincial hospital administrative database. Main vaccine regimen in different birth cohorts was derived from the Quebec City Immunization Registry. Hospital admission risk was analyzed by Poisson regression models adjusting for age, season of birth, ambient air temperature, circulation of respiratory viruses, and the weekly hospital admission rate for all other causes excluding LRTI to control for temporal changes in hospital admission practices. RESULTS: In univariate analyses, hospitalizations for LRTI, pneumonia, and bronchiolitis were less frequent in cohorts exposed to PCVs than in unvaccinated cohorts with no difference between PCV regimens. For pneumonia, the difference in cumulative incidence was 16% (13%; 18%). In multivariate analyses, exposure to any PCV schedule was associated with a lower although statistically non-significant hospitalization risk for pneumonia as compared with unvaccinated cohorts. Again, differences between PCV regimens were minimal. CONCLUSIONS: Interpretation of results of this ecological study should be made with care as many factors could influence hospitalizations for respiratory infection in young children. Results are compatible with a modest effect of PCVs in reducing hospitalizations for pneumonia in children. No substantial differences between various PCV schedules were observed.


RéSUMé: OBJECTIVES: Au Québec, trois vaccins pneumocoques conjugués (VPC) ont été utilisés de manière séquentielle depuis décembre 2004. L'objectif de l'étude était d'étudier l'association entre l'exposition aux différents calendriers vaccinaux de VPC et le risque d'hospitalisation pour infection respiratoire basse (IRB). MéTHODES: Les enregistrements avec un diagnostic principal d'IRB chez les enfants nés en 2000­2012 et observés jusqu'au 2ième anniversaire ont été extraits de la base provinciale de données hospitalières administratives. Le principal calendrier vaccinal utilisé pour chaque cohorte mensuelle de naissances a été identifié à l'aide du Registre de vaccination de la région de Québec. Le risque d'hospitalisation a été analysé par régression de Poisson en ajustant pour l'âge, la saison de naissance, la température ambiante, la circulation de virus respiratoires et le taux d'hospitalisation hebdomadaire de toutes causes excluant les IRB afin de contrôler les changements temporels dans les pratiques d'admission. RéSULTATS: Dans l'analyse univariée, les taux d'hospitalisation pour l'IRB, pour pneumonie et pour bronchiolite étaient plus faibles dans les cohortes exposées aux VPC que dans les cohortes non vaccinées et sans qu'existe de différences substantielles entre les différents calendriers vaccinaux. Pour la pneumonie, la différence du taux cumulatif à 2 ans était de 16 % [13 %; 18 %]. Dans l'analyse multivariée, l'exposition à n'importe quel calendrier vaccinal était associée à un risque moins élevé mais statistiquement non significatif d'hospitalisation et les différences entre les différents calendriers étaient faibles. CONCLUSIONS: L'interprétation des résultats d'une étude écologique doit être prudente, car de multiples facteurs peuvent influencer l'hospitalisation pour une infection respiratoire chez les jeunes enfants. Nos résultats sont compatibles avec un effet modeste du VPC dans la réduction des hospitalisations pour la pneumonie chez les enfants sans que des différences substantielles aient été observées entre les différents calendriers et vaccins.


Assuntos
Hospitalização , Vacinas Pneumocócicas , Infecções Respiratórias , Criança , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/administração & dosagem , Quebeque , Infecções Respiratórias/terapia , Vacinas Conjugadas/administração & dosagem
17.
Int J Circumpolar Health ; 79(1): 1742564, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32191589

RESUMO

Background: The respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a major cause of hospitalisation in young Inuit children. Prophylaxis with palivizumab is routinely recommended for premature infants and those with severe pulmonary or cardiac diseases. In the fall 2016, the Quebec Ministry of Health expanded the criteria to include healthy full-term (HFT) newborns from Nunavik based on their high RSV hospitalisation rates.Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe the impact of this programme on Nunavik health services during the first RSV season after its implementation (2016-2017) by studying challenges, concerns and needs of healthcare workers (HCWs).Methods: An ethnographic approach was used. Semi-structured interviews focusing on HCWs experiences, and opinions to improve the new programme were conducted with 20 HCWs involved in its implementation.Results: Main reported challenges and concerns were: additional work(over)load, lack of information and evidence about the need and efficacy of palivizumab in HFT newborns, communication issues between stakeholders, and ethical issues regarding the Inuit population.Conclusion: The study revealed significant feasibility and acceptability issues. The programme was highly resource consuming. To address HCWs' concerns, evidence-based data regarding palivizumab effectiveness in HFT infants, as well as consultation and involvement of Inuit population are warranted.


Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Agentes Comunitários de Saúde/psicologia , Palivizumab/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial/prevenção & controle , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Quebeque
18.
J Assoc Med Microbiol Infect Dis Can ; 5(4): 235-238, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36340052

RESUMO

Background: The first documented case of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in Quebec was confirmed on February 27, 2020. Retracing the first cases that occur within a geographical region may provide insight regarding the evolution and spread of SARS-CoV-2 in that region because the spread of undiagnosed cases may facilitate the initial community amplification of the virus. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of respiratory tract samples collected for influenza testing in a region of Quebec, Canada, to look for evidence of early circulation of SARS-CoV-2. Frozen nucleic acid extracts initially collected for influenza testing between January 1 and February 20, 2020, were tested for SARS-CoV-2 using a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay. Results: During the study period, 1,440 of 2,121 (67.9%) nucleic acid extracts from individual patients were available for retrospective testing. None of the samples tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Conclusions: The results suggest that SARS-CoV-2 was not circulating within the region before February 20, 2020, because many samples, representing more than two-thirds of all samples tested for influenza during early 2020, were tested. Further studies using a similar methodology to determine the date of onset of SARS-CoV-2 in different countries and geographic areas could enhance our understanding of the current pandemic.


Historique: Le premier cas démontré d'infection par le syndrome respiratoire aigu sévère à coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) au Québec a été confirmé le 27 février 2020. Le retraçage du premier cas survenu dans une région géographique peut donner un aperçu de l'évolution et de la propagation du virus SARS-CoV-2 dans cette région, car la transmission des cas non diagnostiqués peut favoriser l'amplification initiale du virus dans la communauté. Méthodologie: Les chercheurs ont procédé à l'analyse rétrospective des échantillons respiratoires prélevés pour le dépistage de la grippe dans une région du Québec, au Canada, afin de trouver des preuves de circulation précoce du virus SARS-CoV-2D. Les extraits d'acide nucléique congelés entre le 1er janvier et le 20 février 2020 ont été soumis au dépistage du virus SARS-CoV-2 au moyen de l'amplification en chaîne par polymérase après transcriptase inverse. Résultats: Pendant la période de l'étude, 1 440 des 2 121 extraits d'acide nucléique (67,9 %) provenant de patients différents étaient disponibles en vue de tests rétrospectifs. Aucun n'a été positif au virus SARS-CoV-2. Conclusions: D'après les résultats, le virus SARS-CoV-2 n'était pas en circulation dans la région avant le 20 février 2020, car de nombreux échantillons, représentant plus des deux tiers de tous ceux ayant servi au dépistage de la grippe au début de l'année 2020, ont été soumis au dépistage. D'autres études faisant appel à une méthodologie semblable pour déterminer la date d'apparition du virus SARS-CoV-2 dans divers pays et diverses régions géographiques pourraient permettre de mieux comprendre la pandémie en cours.

19.
Infection ; 47(4): 595-601, 2019 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30798473

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare the frequency and the severity of influenza and respiratory syncytial viruses (RSV) infections among children < 24 months hospitalized with respiratory symptoms. METHODS: Data from a prospective study conducted during the peak of five influenza seasons in the Province of Quebec, Canada were used. RESULTS: We detected higher frequency of RSV compared to influenza viruses (55.3% vs. 16.3%). Radiologically confirmed pneumonia was significantly more frequent in children with RSV (39%) than those with influenza (18%) and the clinical course was more severe in RSV than influenza-infected children, especially among infants < 3 months. CONCLUSION: Even during peak weeks of influenza season, we found a higher burden and severity of RSV compared with influenza virus disease in hospitalized children < 24 months.


Assuntos
Monitoramento Epidemiológico , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Vigilância da População , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Influenza Humana/virologia , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Quebeque/epidemiologia , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial/virologia , Vírus Sincicial Respiratório Humano , Estações do Ano
20.
Clin Infect Dis ; 68(2): 204-209, 2019 01 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29846557

RESUMO

Background: Whole genome sequencing (WGS) studies can enhance our understanding of the role of patients with asymptomatic Clostridium difficile colonization in transmission. Methods: Isolates obtained from patients with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and colonization identified in a study conducted during 2006-2007 at 6 Canadian hospitals underwent typing by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, multilocus sequence typing, and WGS. Isolates from incident CDI cases not in the initial study were also sequenced where possible. Ward movement and typing data were combined to identify plausible donors for each CDI case, as defined by shared time and space within predefined limits. Proportions of plausible donors for CDI cases that were colonized, infected, or both were examined. Results: Five hundred fifty-four isolates were sequenced successfully, 353 from colonized patients and 201 from CDI cases. The NAP1/027/ST1 strain was the most common strain, found in 124 (62%) of infected and 92 (26%) of colonized patients. A donor with a plausible ward link was found for 81 CDI cases (40%) using WGS with a threshold of ≤2 single nucleotide polymorphisms to determine relatedness. Sixty-five (32%) CDI cases could be linked to both infected and colonized donors. Exclusive linkages to infected and colonized donors were found for 28 (14%) and 12 (6%) CDI cases, respectively. Conclusions: Colonized patients contribute to transmission, but CDI cases are more likely linked to other infected patients than colonized patients in this cohort with high rates of the NAP1/027/ST1 strain, highlighting the importance of local prevalence of virulent strains in determining transmission dynamics.


Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile/genética , Infecções por Clostridium/microbiologia , Infecções por Clostridium/transmissão , Sequenciamento Completo do Genoma , Portador Sadio , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/transmissão , DNA Bacteriano/genética , Genoma Bacteriano , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...