Ileal metastasis from Phyllodes breast tumor.

We present the case of a 72-year-old woman with a history of right radical mastectomy due to the Phyllodes Tumor. Two months later, she went to the emergency room for intestinal occlusion. Analytically, she had anemia and thrombocytopenia. The abdominal tomography noticed signs of occlusion of the small bowell and injury of 5cm at the pericaecal level. Urgent exploratory laparotomy was performed and objectified distal ileum attached to the cecum with signs of irreversible ischemia, so an ileocaecal resection was performed with ileo-colonic anastomosis. In the postoperative period she presented paralytic ileus and paraneoplastic syndrome with bicytopenia refractory to corticosteroid treatment. To rule out abdominal complications, abdominal tomography was performed on the 5th day post-op that confirmed the integrity of the anastomosis and absence of signs of mechanical occlusion. The patient's evolution was unfavorable, went on to exitus on the 14th day. The anatomopathological study diagnosed metastasis of malignant Phyllodes Tumor at the ileal level.

The transition from open to laparoscopic surgery for bilateral inguinal hernia repair: how we did it.

PURPOSE: To describe the transition process from open repair (OR) to laparoscopic repair (LR) of bilateral inguinal hernia in a small basic general hospital METHODS: We describe the technical details and training strategy used to facilitate the transition to systematic LR of bilateral inguinal hernia. We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from all patients undergoing bilateral inguinal hernia repair between January 2017 and December 2020. We analysed the evolution of LR and compared the surgical outcomes: complications, acute pain (24 h), chronic pain (> 3 months), and recurrence (1 year) of the patients operated on by OR and LR. RESULTS: We performed 132 bilateral inguinal hernia repairs, 55 (41.7%) ORs, and 77 (58.3%) LRs. A significant difference was observed in the choice of LR over time (2017: 9%, 2018: 32%, 2019: 75%, 2020: 91%, p < 0.001). The mean operative time was shorter in the OR group than in the LR group (56 min vs. 108 min, p < 0.001). However, the operative time of the LR decreased over the years. No significant differences were observed in complications or recurrence. LR was associated with lower acute postoperative pain at 24 h (2.2 vs. 3.1 points, p = 0.021) and lower chronic groin pain than OR (1.3% vs. 12.7%, p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: A structured and systematized training process made the transition from OR to LR of bilateral inguinal hernias feasible and safe in a small basic general hospital. This transition did not increase complications or recurrence. Additionally, LR was associated with a decrease in postoperative pain and chronic groin pain.

Results of a Prospective Cohort Study on Open Rives Technique of the Midline Incisional Hernia: Midline Closure and Mesh Overlap.

Background. Rives repair has been traditionally used for large abdominal wall defects with good results on terms of recurrence. However, it is limited by the lateral border of the posterior rectus sheath. The objective of our study was to evaluate recurrence rate, midline closure and mesh overlap in patients operated on elective midline incisional hernia by open Rives retromuscular repair. Methods. This is a prospective observational study of 83 patients who underwent elective open Rives technique between January 2014 and December 2018. Main inclusion criteria were adults with a midline incisional hernia. Recurrence, midline closure and mesh overlap were determined. Results. At a median postoperative follow-up of 32 (5-59) months, 8 cases of recurrence were reported. Patients with recurrence had wider hernia defects (101 ± 52 mm vs 66 ± 36 mm, P = .014) and were repaired with wider meshes (191 ± 93 mm vs 137 ± 68 mm, P = .042). However, although it was not statistically significant, midline closure was lower (38% vs 59%), as well as the overlapping relationship between mesh area and hernia defect area (2.937:1 vs 3.732:1) on patients that developed a recurrence. Conclusions. Rives technique provides good mid-term results in a midline incisional hernia (10% of recurrence at 36 months), including wider hernias in the recurrent cohort. The authors believe that other techniques which allow midline closure and placement of bigger meshes should be considered, especially in those hernias classified as W3 on EuraHS classification (more than 10 cm on width size).

The impact of intracorporeal anastomosis in right laparoscopic colectomy in the surgical site infections and the hospital stay: a cohort study.

Ileocolic anastomosis in laparoscopic-assisted right colectomy is frequently performed extracorporeally. Intracorporeal anastomosis could be associated with several short-term benefits. However, it is a more technically demanding procedure. The primary endpoint of the study aimed to evaluate the postoperative surgical-site infection rate and its impact on the length of hospital stay after laparoscopic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis compared to extracorporeal anastomoses. Between 2010 and 2019, 108 unselected consecutive patients underwent right colectomy. An observational comparative cohort study of two anastomosis techniques, intracorporeal (IA) versus extracorporeal (EA), was conducted. Data were extracted from a prospectively maintained colorectal surgery database of a university-affiliated hospital and retrospectively analyzed. The main exclusion criteria were emergency surgery and medical or anesthetic contraindication for laparoscopy. 53 patients underwent right colectomy with IA, and 55 had extracorporeal anastomoses. The groups did not differ in demographics, anesthetic risk, intraoperative data, pathological outcomes, or overall survival. Mean operative time was longer in the IA group (156.9 vs. 146.0 min; p = 0.061). A significant reduction in the anastomotic leak rate was observed in the IA group compared with the EA group (0 vs. 7.3%; p = 0.045) with no differences in the intraabdominal abscess rate (IA: 1.9% vs. EA: 1.8%; p = 0.97). The wound infection rate was 5.7% for IA and 10.9% for EA (p = 0.324). The hospital stay was significantly shorter for those who had intracorporeal anastomoses (5.2 ± 3.3 vs. 10.8 ± 9.6 days; p = 0.000). Right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis was associated with less surgical-site infections and a significantly shorter hospital stay than EA technique. Surgeons should consider the IA as the first option when performing laparoscopic right colectomy. Registration number: NCT04350203 ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov ).

Cyanoacrylate for Safer Mesh Fixation During Laparoscopic Repair of Morgagni Hernia.

The surgical repair of all Morgagni hernias is recommended to avoid the risk of strangulation of hernia contents. Mesh augmentation repair can reduce the risk of recurrence, but severe injuries have been reported when tacks are used for mesh fixation to the diaphragm. Cyanoacrylate can provide reliable mesh fixation, and in addition, its application is easy and quick by either the transthoracic or laparoscopic approach. This report describes the main steps of laparoscopic mesh augmentation repair of a Morgagni hernia with a focus on atraumatic mesh fixation with cyanoacrylate, which should prevent the potential complications associated with the use of tacks or sutures.

Impact of Surgical Site Infections on Elective Incisional Hernia Surgery: A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Although incisional hernia repair is classified as a clean surgery, it still has a high incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) (0.7%-26.6%). The presence of an SSI could increase early recurrence rates after incisional hernia repair. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing elective incisional hernia repair with no bowel contamination between January and December 2015 were assessed prospectively. Demographic and surgical data, local post-operative complications, and one-year recurrence rates in patients with and without SSI were compared. The management of SSI was determined. RESULTS: Patients with SSI (16/101) showed more prolonged surgical procedures (91 ± 39 vs. 63 ± 30 min, p = 0.012), more post-operative sero-hematomas (38% vs. 8%, p = 0.001), and a higher one-year recurrence rate (19% vs. 4%, p = 0.047). Multivariable analysis revealed the only identified risk factor for SSI to be post-operative sero-hematomas (p = 0.042; odds ratio [OR] = 4.17 [1.05-16.54]). Patients who developed an SSI required antibiotic agents and daily treatment from one to five months. One of these required the removal of the mesh. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical site infection rates are high for incisional hernia surgery (16%), and associated with local complications. Surgical site infection requires long-term treatments and leads to a higher one-year recurrence rate.

Prevención de la hernia incisional mediante malla retrofascial fijada con cianoacrilato / Incisional hernia prevention using a cyanoacrilate-fixed retrofascial mesh

Introducción: La incidencia de hernia incisional en pacientes de riesgo (obesidad, cáncer, etc.) es elevada, incluso en cirugía laparoscópica. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar la seguridad del empleo de mallas profilácticas retrofasciales fijadas con cianoacrilato en la incisión de asistencia en pacientes con sobrepeso sometidos a cirugía laparoscópica colorrectal. Métodos: Estudio prospectivo de cohortes, no aleatorizado, de pacientes sometidos a resección laparoscópica electiva por cáncer colorrectal entre enero de 2013 y marzo de 2016. Aquellos con índice de masa corporal superior a 25 kg/m2 fueron evaluados para implantar una malla profiláctica fijada con cianoacrilato (Histoacryl®) como refuerzo de la incisión de asistencia. Resultados: Se analizan 52 pacientes (índice de masa corporal medio: 28,4±2 kg/m2). En 15 pacientes se implantó una malla profiláctica. El tiempo de implante siempre fue inferior a 5 minutos. No hubo diferencias significativas en la tasa de infección de herida (12 vs. 10%). Ninguna malla requirió ser explantada. Aunque el seguimiento medio es menor (14,1±4 vs. 22,3±9 meses), no ha aparecido hernia incisional en el grupo malla. Por el contrario, en el grupo no malla se han observado una evisceración (2,7%) y 4 eventraciones de la incisión de asistencia (10,8%). No hubo diferencias significativas entre los grupos respecto a hernia incisional de trócar (6,6 vs. 5,4%). Conclusiones: La implantación de mallas profilácticas en pacientes con sobrepeso u obesidad sometidos a cirugía laparoscópica colorrectal es segura y parece reducir la tasa de eventraciones a corto plazo. La fijación con cianoacrilato es un método rápido que facilita el procedimiento sin complicaciones adicionales (AU)

Introduction: The rate of incisional hernia in high-risk patients (obesity, cancer, etc.) is high, even in laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety of the use of cyanoacrylate fixed prophylactic meshes in the assistance incision in overweight or obese patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Methods: A prospective, non-randomized cohort study of patients undergoing elective laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer between January 2013 and March 2016 was performed. Those with a body mass index greater than 25 kg / m2 were evaluated to implant a prophylactic meshes fixed with cyanoacrylate (Histoacryl®) as reinforcement of the assistance incision. Results: 52 patients were analyzed (mean body mass index: 28.4±2 kg / m 2). Prophylactic meshes was implanted in 15 patients. The time to put the mesh in place was always less than 5minutes. There was no significant difference in wound infection rate (12% vs. 10%). No mesh had to be explanted. Although the mean follow-up was shorter (14.1±4 vs. 22.3±9 months), there were no incisional hernia in the mesh group. On the other hand, in the non-mesh group, 1 acute evisceration (2.7%) and 4 incisional hernia of the assistance incision were observed (10.8%). There were no significant differences between groups regarding trocar incisional hernia (6.6 vs. 5.4%). Conclusions: The implantation of a reinforcement prophylactic mesh in overweight or obese patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery is safe and seems to reduce the short-term rate of incisional hernia. Fixation with cyanoacrylate is a rapid method that facilitates the procedure without additional complications (AU)

Incisional hernia prevention using a cyanoacrilate-fixed retrofascial mesh. / Prevención de la hernia incisional mediante malla retrofascial fijada con cianoacrilato.

INTRODUCTION: The rate of incisional hernia in high-risk patients (obesity, cancer, etc.) is high, even in laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety of the use of cyanoacrylate fixed prophylactic meshes in the assistance incision in overweight or obese patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. METHODS: A prospective, non-randomized cohort study of patients undergoing elective laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer between January 2013 and March 2016 was performed. Those with a body mass index greater than 25kg / m2 were evaluated to implant a prophylactic meshes fixed with cyanoacrylate (Histoacryl®) as reinforcement of the assistance incision. RESULTS: 52 patients were analyzed (mean body mass index: 28.4±2kg / m 2). Prophylactic meshes was implanted in 15 patients. The time to put the mesh in place was always less than 5minutes. There was no significant difference in wound infection rate (12% vs. 10%). No mesh had to be explanted. Although the mean follow-up was shorter (14.1±4 vs. 22.3±9 months), there were no incisional hernia in the mesh group. On the other hand, in the non-mesh group, 1 acute evisceration (2.7%) and 4 incisional hernia of the assistance incision were observed (10.8%). There were no significant differences between groups regarding trocar incisional hernia (6.6 vs. 5.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The implantation of a reinforcement prophylactic mesh in overweight or obese patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery is safe and seems to reduce the short-term rate of incisional hernia. Fixation with cyanoacrylate is a rapid method that facilitates the procedure without additional complications.

Five-year outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a primary procedure for morbid obesity: A prospective study.

AIM: To prospectively evaluate the postoperative morbi-mortality and weight loss evolution of patients who underwent a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as a primary bariatric procedure during 5 years of follow-up. METHODS: Since 2006, data from patients undergoing a highly restrictive primary LSG have been prospectively registered in a database and analysed. Preoperative co-morbid conditions, operating time, hospital stay, early and late complications rate and evolution of weight loss after 5 years of follow-up were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients were included, 74.3% of whom were women. The mean age was 43.2 ± 13.1 years and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 41.5 ± 7.9 kg/m2. Seventy patients (44.8%) presented a BMI under 40 kg/m2. The mortality rate was 0%. The leakage rate was 1.2%, and the total 30-d morbidity rate was 5.1% (8/156). With a mean follow-up of 32.7 ± 28.5 (range 6-112) mo, the mean percent of excess of weight loss (%EWL) was 82.0 ± 18.8 at 1 year, 76.7 ± 21.3 at 3 years and 60.3 ± 28.9 at 5 years. The mean percent of excess of BMI loss (%EBMIL) was 94.9 ± 22.4 at 1 year, 89.4 ± 27.4 at 3 years and 74.8 ± 29.4 at 5 years. Patients with preoperative BMI less than 40 kg/m2 achieved greater weight loss than did the overall study population. Diabetes remitted in 75% of the patients and HTA improved in 71.7%. CPAP masks were withdrawn in all patients with obstructive sleep apnoea. CONCLUSION: LSG built with a narrow 34 F bougie and starting 3 cm from the pylorus proved to be safe and highly effective in terms of weight loss as a stand-alone procedure, particularly in patients with a preoperative BMI lower than 40 kg/m2.

Single-incision laparoscopy versus standard laparoscopy for colorectal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate if the advantages of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) to perform a colorectal resection justify a broad application of this approach. A total of 32 studies including 3863 patients, comparing colorectal procedures performed with SILS or multi-port laparoscopy (LCS) were analyzed after a systematic review. Colorectal SILS had comparable outcomes to multi-port LCS in terms of operating time (P = 0.44), conversion rate (2.0% vs 3.0%; P = 0.52), reoperations (1.1% vs 1.7%; P = 0.26), postoperative complications (14.4% vs 13.6%; P = 0.10) and mortality (0.24% vs 0.68%; P = 0.46). Mean hospital stay was significantly shorter in CSILS group, (MD = -0.88 [-1.33, -0,42], 95% CI, P = 0.0001), but heterogeneity was found (I2 = 65%; P < 0.0001). The oncological results of SILS for colorectal cancer were satisfactory, as demonstrated by similar average lymph node retrieval (P = 0.72) and adequate resection margins (negative in all cases) compared to those obtained with LCS. Nevertheless, there are currently no available long-term follow-up data comparing the survival rates and local recurrence between both approaches. Insufficient data were available for evaluating long-term incisional hernia rates, and other potential benefits associated with colorectal SILS (cosmesis, postoperative pain) remain to be objectively proved. To date there is insufficient evidence to recommend widespread use of SILS instead of LCS for colorectal surgery.

HAL-RAR (Doppler guided haemorrhoid artery ligation with recto-anal repair) is a safe and effective procedure for haemorrhoids. Results of a prospective study after two-years follow-up.

PURPOSE: To analyse prospectively results of HAL-RAR technique by evaluating pain, perioperative complications and clinical outcome after two years followup. METHODS: A prospective study design including 30 consecutive patients with haemorrhoids grade III-IV treated from June 2012. After discharge, patients received a specific questionnaire to record postoperative pain, delayed complications, evolution/disappearance of the symptoms that led to the surgical intervention (bleeding, prolapse, itching, pain and soiling). A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to measure pain. Outpatient follow-up was carried out at 7 days, and 1, 6 and 12 months and annually thereafter. Pre, intra and postoperative data (including physical examination) had been recorded prospectively. RESULTS: The median operating time (range) was 40 (26-60) minutes. Average hospital stay (range) was 11 (3-25) hours. No postoperative complications were observed in 29 cases (96.6%). Median follow-up was 26 (12-36) months. All the patients attended the follow-up. Mean postoperative pain was VAS = 1.7 on the seventh day and it was practically non-existent (VAS = 0.7) 1 month after the procedure. 87.5% of patients confirmed complete relief of symptoms after 30 days and 93% of patients feel free of symptoms 6 months after the procedure. No patient has experienced late complications as dyschezia, urgency, soiling or faecal incontinence. After 24 months follow-up, recurrence of bleeding and prolapse was observed in only 1 patient; 93% of patients have considered results of HAL-RAR as very good or excellent. CONCLUSION: HAL-RAR is safe and almost painless technique and it has very good results in the control of haemorrhoidal symptoms. This procedure should be considered as an effective first treatment option for haemorrhoids.

Abordaje laparoscópico de la oclusión mecánica de intestino delgado en pacientes seleccionados. Resultados preliminares / Laparoscopic approach in mechanical small bowell obstruction in selected patients. Preliminary results

Objetivo. Describir el abordaje laparoscópico de la oclusión de intestino delgado susceptible de tratamiento quirúrgico y analizar su capacidad como técnica diagnóstica y de tratamiento en pacientes seleccionados, evaluando las complicaciones y su impacto en la recuperación postoperatoria de los pacientes. Pacientes y método. Estudio prospectivo descriptivo de 18 pacientes seleccionados, intervenidos por laparoscopia en régimen de urgencias. Criterios de inclusión: ausencia de contraindicación médica o anestésica y disponibilidad técnica y/o tecnológica del equipo de guardia. Criterios de exclusión: enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal activa, antecedente de neoplasia o radioterapia abdominal y/o laparotomías previas múltiples. Resultado. El abordaje laparoscópico permitió la exploración completa del intestino delgado en el 100 por ciento de los casos, identificar la causa de la oclusión en el 94,4 por ciento y resolverla en todos los pacientes (en 2 mediante laparoscopia asistida), excepto en uno. El tiempo operatorio promedio fue de 87 min. No ha habido mortalidad ni complicaciones postoperatorias mayores. Ha habido 2 complicaciones menores en 18 pacientes (11,1 por ciento). La estancia hospitalaria promedio fue de 5 días y el retorno a la actividad normal se efectuó al cabo de 12,3 días. Ningún paciente ha presentado recurrencia ni ha requerido reintervención tras un seguimiento medio de 20 meses. Conclusiones. El abordaje laparoscópico es una alternativa eficaz para tratar una oclusión de intestino delgado en pacientes estrictamente seleccionados, dados sus buenos resultados terapéuticos y su baja morbilidad. No obstante, la complejidad técnica del procedimiento en determinados casos de oclusión impide su recomendación sistemática (AU)