Extended reality navigation for pain procedures: a narrative review.

BACKGROUND: Extended reality (XR) technology, encompassing virtual reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality, has been widely studied for procedural navigation in surgical specialties. Similar to how ultrasound transformed regional anesthesia, XR has the potential to reshape how anesthesiologists and pain physicians perform procedures to relieve pain. OBJECTIVE: This narrative review examines the clinical benefits of XR for navigation in various pain procedures. It defines key terms and concepts related to XR technology and explores characteristics of procedures that are most amenable to XR-based navigation. Finally, it suggests best practices for developing XR navigation systems and discusses the role of emerging technology in the future of XR in regional anesthesia and pain medicine. EVIDENCE REVIEW: A search was performed across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for primary literature investigating the clinical benefits of XR navigation for pain procedures. FINDINGS: Thirteen studies using XR for procedural navigation are included. The evidence includes randomized controlled trials, retrospective studies, and case series. CONCLUSIONS: Early randomized controlled trials show potential for XR to improve procedural efficiency, but more comprehensive research is needed to determine if there are significant clinical benefits. Case reports demonstrate XR's utility in generating patient-specific navigation plans when difficult anatomy is encountered. Procedures that facilitate the generation and registration of XR images are most conducive to XR navigation, whereas those that rely on frequent re-imaging will continue to depend on traditional modes of navigation.

What Is Medical Extended Reality? A Taxonomy Defining the Current Breadth and Depth of an Evolving Field.

Medical extended reality (MXR) has emerged as a dynamic field at the intersection of health care and immersive technology, encompassing virtual, augmented, and mixed reality applications across a wide range of medical disciplines. Despite its rapid growth and recognition by regulatory bodies, the field lacks a standardized taxonomy to categorize its diverse research and applications. This American Medical Extended Reality Association guideline, authored by the editorial board of the Journal of Medical Extended Reality, introduces a comprehensive taxonomy for MXR, developed through a multidisciplinary and international collaboration of experts. The guideline seeks to standardize terminology, categorize existing work, and provide a structured framework for future research and development in MXR. An international and multidisciplinary panel of experts was convened, selected based on publication track record, contributions to MXR, and other objective measures. Through an iterative process, the panel identified primary and secondary topics in MXR. These topics were refined over several rounds of review, leading to the final taxonomy. The taxonomy comprises 13 primary topics that jointly expand into 180 secondary topics, demonstrating the field's breadth and depth. At the core of the taxonomy are five overarching domains: (1) technological integration and innovation; (2) design, development, and deployment; (3) clinical and therapeutic applications; (4) education, training, and communication; and (5) ethical, regulatory, and socioeconomic considerations. The developed taxonomy offers a framework for categorizing the diverse research and applications within MXR. It may serve as a foundational tool for researchers, clinicians, funders, academic publishers, and regulators, facilitating clearer communication and categorization in this rapidly evolving field. As MXR continues to grow, this taxonomy will be instrumental in guiding its development and ensuring a cohesive understanding of its multifaceted nature.

Gabapentin for Postoperative Pain Control and Opioid Reduction in Scrotal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of gabapentin in reducing postoperative pain among patients undergoing scrotal surgery for male infertility by conducting a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, healthy men undergoing scrotal surgery with a single surgeon were randomized to receive either (1) gabapentin 600 mg given 2 hours preoperatively and 300 mg taken 3 times a day postoperatively for 3 days, or (2) inactive placebo. The primary outcome measure was difference in postoperative pain scores. Secondary outcomes included differences in opioid usage, patient satisfaction, and adverse events. RESULTS: Of 97 patients screened, 74 enrolled and underwent randomization. Of these, 4 men were lost to follow-up, and 70 were included in the final analysis (35 gabapentin, 35 placebo). Both differences in initial postoperative mean pain score (-1.14, 95% CI -2.21 to -0.08, P = .035) and final mean pain score differences (-1.27, 95% CI -2.23 to -0.32, P = .0097) indicated lower gabapentin pain compared to placebo. There were no statistically significant differences in opioid usage, patient satisfaction, or adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that perioperative gabapentin results in a statistically and clinically significant decrease in pain following scrotal surgery. While there was no evidence of an impact on opioid usage or patient satisfaction, given the low risk of adverse events, it may be considered as part of a multimodal pain management strategy.

Dishonest Physician Reviews: Challenging Physician Online Reviews and the Appeals Process.

Physician reviews influence how patients seek care, but dishonest reviews can be detrimental to a physician practice. It is unclear if reviews can be challenged, and processes differ and are not readily apparent. The objective of this observational study was to determine the ability to challenge dishonest negative reviews online. Commonly used websites for physician reviews as of August 2021 were utilized: Healthgrades, Vitals, RateMDs, Zocdoc, Yelp, and Google Business. Each review platform's website was tested for leaving a physician review and process of appeal and possible removal of a negative review. The process for appeal and the steps involved in posting and appealing a review were determined, whether individuals are verified patients and criteria for verification, how physicians can respond, and the process of appealing false or defamatory reviews.Any individual can leave reviews by searching for a physician's name or practice and visiting their profile page and can then provide a rating and written review of their experience with the physician. Many require verification to prevent suspicious activity but not proof of a medical visit, allowing significant potential for inaccurate review postings. Posting a review can be done by anyone without verification of a visit. It is challenging for physicians to remove negative online reviews, as most review platforms have strict policies against. This review concludes that physicians should be aware of their online presence and the steps that can be taken to address issues to mitigate adverse effects on their practices.

Treatment Delay From Onset of Occipital Neuralgia Symptoms to Treatment with Nerve Decompression Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to a) evaluate the time between onset of occipital neuralgia symptoms and nerve decompression surgery, b) perform a cost comparison analysis between surgical and non-surgical treatment of occipital neuralgia and c) report postoperative results of nerve decompression for occipital neuralgia. METHODS: 1,112 subjects who underwent screening for nerve decompression surgery were evaluated for occipital neuralgia. 367 (33%) patients met the inclusion criteria. Timing of occipital neuralgia symptom onset and pain characteristics were prospectively collected. Cost associated with the non-surgical treatment of occipital neuralgia was calculated for the period between onset of symptoms and surgery. RESULTS: 226 (73%) patients underwent occipital nerve decompression. The average time between onset of occipital neuralgia and surgery was 19 years (7.1-32). Postoperatively, the median number of pain days per month decreased by 17 (0-26, 57%) (p < 0.001), the median pain intensity decreased by 4 (2-8, 44%) (p < 0.001), and median pain duration in hours was reduced by 12 (2-23, 50%) (p < 0.001). The annual mean cost of non-surgical occipital neuralgia treatment was $28,728.82 ($16,419.42-$41,198.41) per patient. The mean cost during the 19-year timeframe prior to surgery was $545,847.75($311,968.90-$782,769.82). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that patients suffer from occipital neuralgia for an average of 19 years prior to undergoing surgery. Nerve decompression reduces symptom severity significantly and should be considered earlier in the treatment course of occipital neuralgia that is refractory to conservative treatment to prevent patient morbidity and decrease direct and indirect healthcare costs. IRB REGISTRATION NUMBER & NAME: Weill Cornell Medicine: 23-04025985, Prospective Cohort Study Investigating Long- Term Outcomes After Headache Surgery.The Massachusetts General Hospital: 2012P001527, Correlation of pre-operative pain self-efficacy and post-operative migraine-specific symptoms and disability.

Impact of Long-Term Evoked Compound Action Potential Controlled Closed-Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation on Sleep Quality in Patients With Chronic Pain: An EVOKE Randomized Controlled Trial Study Subanalysis.

OBJECTIVE: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is considered an effective interventional nonpharmacologic treatment option for several chronic pain conditions. Here we present the effects of the novel evoked compound action potential (ECAP) controlled closed-loop (ECAP-CL) SCS system on long-term sleep quality outcomes from the EVOKE study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The EVOKE study is a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial conducted at 13 sites in the United States (N = 134 patients). The clinical trial utilized SCS to manage chronic pain and compared novel ECAP-CL technology to open-loop SCS. Additionally, sleep quality data was collected using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at baseline and all study visits. RESULTS: The mean PSQI global score for ECAP-CL patients at baseline was 14.0 (n = 62; ± 0.5, SD 3.8), indicating poor sleep quality. Clinically meaningful and statistically significant reductions (p < 0.001) in the global PSQI scores were noted at 12 months (n = 55; 5.7 ± 0.6, SD 4.2). A total of 76.4% of ECAP-CL patients met or exceeded Minimal Clinically Important Difference from baseline in PSQI at 12 months. Additionally, 30.9% of ECAP-CL patients achieved "good sleep quality" scores (PSQI ≤ 5), and 29.1% achieved sleep quality remission. "Normative" sleep scores were observed in 29.6% of ECAP-CL patients at 12 months, and these scores were better than the US general population. Additionally, ECAP-CL patients achieved statistically significant changes from baseline (p < 0.01) across all seven subcomponent scores of PSQI at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: ECAP-CL SCS elicits consistent neural activation of the target leading to less variability in long-term therapy delivery. In the EVOKE study, this resulted in ECAP-CL patients demonstrating clinically superior and sustained pain relief. Results from this study provide new evidence of long-term improvement in sleep quality and quantity in patients with chronic pain resulting from the use of this novel ECAP-CL SCS technology. CLINICAL TRAIL REGISTRATION: The Clinicaltrials.gov registration number for the study is NCT02924129.

Preliminary effects of low-intensity focused ultrasound treatment program for cancer-related neuropathic pain.

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) therapy in the management of cancer-related neuropathic pain (CNP). Methods: A retrospective review with 22 patients with CNP treated with LIFU therapy (frequency 3 Hz, 3 W/cm2, pulse mode duty cycle 50%) was conducted. Results: Out of the 22 patients, 15 had CNP secondary to chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Compared with baseline, there was a significant reduction in numeric pain rating scale (p < 0.001). Additionally, 76.5% of patients (n = 13) were considered to be responders to LIFU therapy. Conclusion: LIFU therapy may be a viable treatment modality in the management of CNP, specifically chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, with a minimal side effect profile. Larger, prospective studies with a structured protocol are necessary.

Lay abstract With recent advancements in oncological treatments, there has been an increase in the number of cancer survivors. This has led to an increase in prevalence and burden of long-term side effects of oncological disease and associated treatments. Cancer-related neuropathic pain (CNP) is a debilitating pain condition that develops in the setting of direct tumor burden or as a result of cancer-related treatments, such as chemotherapy. Management can be challenging and clinicians are often limited to pharmacological agents and more invasive modalities. This study evaluated the effectiveness of low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU), a noninvasive, externally applied therapeutic ultrasound device, as a treatment for CNP. Twenty-two patients with CNP were treated with LIFU and found to have significant reduction in pain, suggesting LIFU may be an effective treatment modality in the management of CNP. This pilot study has laid the ground work for future prospective studies to further investigate the effects of LIFU on CNP.

Cannabis, anesthesia and acute postoperative pain: known and unknown.

Tweetable abstract Cannabis use may significantly affect anesthetic, perioperative and acute pain management care; but research needs to be standardized, expanded and more inclusive.

Failure of SCS MR-Conditional Modes Due to High Impedance: A Review of Literature and Case Series.

INTRODUCTION: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) conditional modes are a novel feature for certain Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved spinal cord stimulation (SCS) devices. However, there is a paucity of literature around the limitation of MRI-conditional modes ("MRI safe"), specifically in clinical scenarios where urgent MRIs may be needed. One such limitation is load impedance, referring to the circuit's resistance to the current being generated by the system. High impedance can limit the MRI-conditional mode capability, presenting potential harm to a patient undergoing an MRI or make an MRI unable to be completed. METHODS: Three cases were identified, and informed consent was obtained. All information was obtained via retrospective chart review. RESULTS: In this case series of three patients where MRI-conditional SCS systems were unable to be placed in "MRI safe" settings, preventing timely MRI study completion in the setting of high impedance, all three were required to undergo alternative imaging including CT scans, and two patients ultimately had the system explanted and one chose to be re-implanted after completion of scans. CONCLUSION: This case series highlights the need for further investigation of impedance in SCS systems and potential limitations for future MRI usage. The review of literature of impedance in SCS shows both device- and physiologic-related etiologies for changes in impedance that warrant consideration by the implanting physician.

Neuromodulation and the Epidemiology of Magnetic Resonance Utilization for Lung, Breast, Colon, and Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Neuromodulation is a growing therapeutic modality for the treatment of chronic pain. Determining whether a patient is an appropriate candidate for implantation of a neuromodulatory device and whether the device requires an MRI conditional feature necessitates understanding the patient's likelihood of requiring an MRI. Active treatment of cancer represents known high-risk clinical scenarios for MRI. However, the growth of MRI as a tool for diagnosis of cancer also warrants consideration by implanting physicians when assessing high-risk patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Here, we conduct a systematic review of the literature to determine the epidemiology for MR utilization for breast, lung, prostate, and colon cancer. Out of 126 papers reviewed, 39 were ultimately analyzed to determine the relative likelihood of an MRI in the course of oncologic care. RESULTS: We find that there is a low likelihood for MRI to be utilized as part of any screening process and a variable likelihood during the staging and surveillance phases across all cancer subtypes depending on the clinical circumstances. Certain populations present special consideration for MRI screening, such as the high at-risk breast cancer population, and MRI surveillance and staging, such as aging males (>50 years old) at risk for prostate cancer or individuals diagnosed with rectal cancers. CONCLUSION: High likelihood of MRI within the oncologic context represents important distinction criteria for neuromodulation as patients may benefit from implantation of an MR conditional system.