Neoadjuvant androgen ablation in localized carcinoma of the prostate.

BACKGROUND: An increased awareness of prostate cancer has led to a rise in the detection of this disease at a clinically localized stage at presentation. This article discusses the role of neoadjuvant hormonal ablation at this earlier stage to decrease tumor bulk and thus enhance survival. METHODS: Outcomes from each primary modality for localized treatment of prostate cancer with and without neoadjuvant androgen deprivation (NAAD) are reviewed. RESULTS: Survival benefit using NAAD has not yet been demonstrated from prostatectomy. Long-term hormonal deprivation provides an improved time to progression and has decreased distant metastatic and biochemical failure for poor-risk patients undergoing external-beam radiation. The toxicities of brachytherapy can be decreased with NAAD. CONCLUSIONS: NAAD with radical prostatectomy is considered to be investigational. The duration of NAAD needs to be delineated for poor-prognosis patients who are treated with external-beam radiation therapy, but the approach improves the local toxicity of brachytherapy.

The treatment challenge of hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Both the demographics and treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) are changing. Patients are younger and healthier, with fewer comorbidities. The "no treatment until symptoms" approach is disappearing. Chemotherapy is increasingly being utilized. METHODS: The authors review the steps involved in hormone management before chemotherapy is considered. The roles for chemotherapy in current clinical trials are examined. RESULTS: Effective hormonal management of the prostate cancer patient incorporates an understanding of the stages of hormone sensitivity and prescribing additional interventions beyond simple castration. Once hormone refractoriness is established, the combination of mitoxantrone and prednisone has become a standard chemotherapeutic approach. New agents such as docetaxel are being tested in phase III trials against mitoxantrone plus prednisone. CONCLUSIONS: HRPC is now regarded as a chemotherapy-sensitive tumor. The goals of chemotherapy in HRPC are to decrease PSA level and improve quality of life. New agents and combinations are needed to improve survival.

Feasibility trial of postoperative radiotherapy and cisplatin followed by three courses of 5-FU and cisplatin in patients with resected head and neck cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

BACKGROUND: Appropriate adjuvant chemotherapy for resected head and neck cancer patients has yet to be defined. Multiple trials have noted trends toward improved disease-free survival and local control. The Southwest Oncology Group undertook a feasibility trial of postoperative cisplatin and radiotherapy followed by three cycles of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. METHODS: Patients with resected stage III or IV head and neck cancer received cisplatin, 100 mg/m2, on days 1, 22, and 43 of radiotherapy. This therapy was followed by three cycles of cisplatin, 100 mg/m2 or last tolerated dose, and 5-fluorouracil, 1000 mg/m2, on days 1 to 4 every 21 days. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients from 22 institutions were registered; 68 were evaluable. Sixty-eight patients received radiotherapy. Only 25 of 68 patients (36.7%) were able to complete all six cycles of chemotherapy. Forty-three of 68 patients (63%) completed all three cycles with radiotherapy. Toxicities were tolerable. One toxic death occurred. CONCLUSIONS: It is not feasible to deliver six cycles of chemotherapy postoperatively in the sequence described. Compliance issues need further exploration to define effective adjuvant chemotherapy for head and neck patients.

Continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin for advanced/recurrent transitional cell cancer of the bladder: a Southwest Oncology Group trial.

Significant toxicities result from the use of MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin, cisplatin) for advanced/ recurrent transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder (ARTCCB). An alternative regimen of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin was evaluated by Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG). Thirty-eight patients with ARTCCB were treated with continuous infusion 5-FU 1,000 mg/m2/days 1-5 and cisplatin 100 mg/day 1, on a every-21-days schedule. There were two complete responses (CR) and eight partial responses (PR) among 36 eligible patients, for an overall response rate of 28% [95% confidence interval (CI) 14-45%]. Median duration of response was 6 months, and median duration of survival was 9 months. No toxic deaths occurred. Grade 4 leukopenia occurred in 5 patients. Other toxicities were mild. Only two documented infections occurred in 5 patients with neutropenia. The response rate of 28% is better than that achieved with cisplatin alone and not dissimilar to the range of response for MVAC. Toxicities were less and tolerable. This regimen will need further evaluation.

Ondansetron for nausea and vomiting associated with moderately emetogenic cancer chemotherapy.

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind study compared the efficacy and tolerability of ondansetron 8 mg twice daily for 3 days with placebo in preventing nausea and vomiting in 81 patients receiving cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-based chemotherapy. The first dose of study drug was administered 30 minutes before the initiation of chemotherapy. Patients received a rescue antiemetic if the investigator deemed it necessary or if the patient experienced more than two emetic episodes during the 3-day study. Sixty-one percent of patients treated with ondansetron compared with 6% of patients receiving placebo (P < 0.001) had no emetic episodes during the 3-day study. Among patients with at least one emetic episode, the mean time to emesis was 24 hours 18 minutes in the ondansetron group compared with 8 hours 1 minute in the placebo group (P < 0.001). In the intent-to-treat analysis, 78% of patients in the ondansetron group and 29% of patients in the placebo group completed the study with no need for rescue therapy. Clinical laboratory and adverse-event profiles were similar between groups. The most common adverse event was headache, occurring in 23% of ondansetron patients and 24% of placebo patients. This study is the first double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to demonstrate that ondansetron 8 mg twice daily is effective in the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-based chemotherapy. The twice-daily regimen may encourage patient compliance and may be more cost-effective than regimens that need to be given three times daily.

Evaluation of low dose continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced and recurrent renal cell carcinoma. A Southwest Oncology Group Study.

BACKGROUND: The response rate of metastatic renal cell cancer to cytotoxic therapy over the last 10 years has been 5.6%. Low dose continuous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has demonstrated efficacy in other cytotoxic refractory tumors, such as pancreas, colorectal, and recurrent breast. The Southwest Oncology Group undertook a Phase II trial of low dose, continuous 5-FU in metastatic renal cell cancer. METHODS: Sixty-one patients were entered in the study to receive 300 mg 5-FU/m2/day for 7 days via a central venous catheter and external programmable pump. The pump was refilled every 7 days. Pyridoxine (50 mg, orally) was administered prophylactically three times a day. RESULTS: A response of 5.2% (one complete response [CR] and two partial responses [PRs]) was achieved. The overall survival was 12 months. The duration of the CR is more than 30 months. Both PRs lasted 6 months. No survival advantage was noted with either prior nephrectomy or biologic therapy. The majority of toxicities were Grade 2: anemia, anorexia, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, and stomatitis. No toxic deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: Low dose, continuous 5-FU demonstrated minimal activity in metastatic renal cancer.

A randomized, double-blind comparison of intravenous ondansetron alone and in combination with intravenous dexamethasone in the prevention of high-dose cisplatin-induced emesis.

PURPOSE: This study compares the efficacy and safety of ondansetron alone with that of ondansetron plus dexamethasone in the prevention of emesis induced by high-dose cisplatin (> or = 100 mg/m2). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter study used a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group design. Chemotherapy-naive patients were randomized to receive intravenous (IV) ondansetron (Zofran, Cerenex Pharmaceuticals, Research Triangle Park, NC) 0.15 mg/kg for three doses every 4 hours beginning 30 minutes before cisplatin administration either alone or in combination with dexamethasone 20 mg administered 45 minutes before cisplatin. Cisplatin (> or = 100 mg/m2) was administered as a single infusion (< or = 3 hours). Patients were monitored for emetic episodes (EEs), adverse events, and laboratory safety parameters for 24 hours after cisplatin administration. RESULTS: A total of 275 patients were enrolled. Of these, 245 were assessable for efficacy. Patients who received ondansetron plus dexamethasone had a higher complete antiemetic response rate (61% v 46%, P = .02) and less nausea (posttreatment visual analog scale mean 18.2 v 32.8, P < .001) than did those who received ondansetron alone. The time to the first EE was longer for patients in the group that received ondansetron plus dexamethasone (P = .005). Headache (12%), diarrhea (2%), and abdominal colic (1%) were the most common antiemetic-related adverse events reported. The incidence of adverse events was similar between the treatment groups. CONCLUSION: IV ondansetron in combination with dexamethasone is safe and more effective than ondansetron alone in the prevention of emesis induced by high-dose cisplatin.

Stratified, randomized, double-blind comparison of intravenous ondansetron administered as a multiple-dose regimen versus two single-dose regimens in the prevention of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting.

PURPOSE: This study compares the efficacy and safety of two single-dose regimens with the approved three-dose regimen of ondansetron in the prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter study was a stratified, randomized, double-blind, and parallel group design. Chemotherapy-naive inpatients were randomized to receive intravenous (IV) ondansetron (Zofran; Glaxo Inc, Research Triangle Park, NC) 0.15 mg/kg times three doses, every 4 hours or a single 8-mg or 32-mg dose followed by two saline doses that began 30 minutes before cisplatin administration. Cisplatin (high-dose > or = 100 mg/m2 or medium-dose 50 to 70 mg/m2) was given as a single infusion (< or = 3 hours). Patients were monitored for emetic episodes, adverse events, and laboratory safety parameters for 24 hours after cisplatin administration. RESULTS: A total of 699 patients (359 high-dose, 340 medium-dose) were enrolled. Of these, 618 were assessable for efficacy (15 ineligible, 66 protocol deviations). The 32-mg dose was superior to the 8-mg single dose with regard to total number of emetic episodes (high-dose, P = .015; medium-dose, P < .001), complete response (no emetic episodes: high-dose, 48% v 35%; P = .048; medium-dose, 73% v 50%; P = .001) and failure rate (> 5 emetic episodes, withdrawn or rescued: high-dose, 20% v 34%; P = .018; medium-dose, 9% v 23%; P = .005). The 32-mg single dose was also superior to the 0.15 mg/kg times three dose regimen with regard to total number of emetic episodes (medium-dose, P = .033) and failure rate (high-dose, 20% v 36%; P = .009; medium-dose, 9% v 22%; P = .011). Ondansetron was well tolerated. The most common adverse event was headache. An approximate 10-fold increase in the incidence of clinically significant transaminase elevations was observed in the high-dose versus medium-dose cisplatin strata (aspartate aminotransferase [AST], 6.5% v 0.7%; serum alanine aminotransferase [ALT], 5.0% v 0.3%). CONCLUSION: A 32-mg single dose of ondansetron is more effective than a single 8-mg dose and is at least as effective as the standard regimen of 0.15 mg/kg times three doses in the prevention of cisplatin-induced acute emesis.

Randomized comparison of cisplatin plus fluorouracil and carboplatin plus fluorouracil versus methotrexate in advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: The Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) conducted a randomized comparison of cisplatin plus fluorouracil (5-FU) and carboplatin plus 5-FU versus single-agent methotrexate (MTX) in patients with recurrent and metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck. The primary objective was to compare separately the response rates of each combination regimen to standard weekly MTX. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred seventy-seven patients diagnosed with SCC of the head and neck were randomized to one of three treatments: (1) cisplatin 100 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on day 1 and 5-FU 1,000 mg/m2 per day for a 96-hour continuous infusion repeated every 21 days; (2) carboplatin 300 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and 5-FU 1,000 mg/m2 per day for a 96-hour continuous infusion repeated every 28 days; and (3) MTX 40 mg/m2 IV given weekly. RESULTS: All three treatment regimens were well tolerated. However, both hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were significantly greater with cisplatin plus 5-FU compared with MTX (P = .001). Toxicity from carboplatin plus 5-FU was intermediate compared with the other regimens. The complete and partial response rates were 32% for cisplatin plus 5-FU, 21% for carboplatin plus 5-FU, and 10% for MTX. The comparison of cisplatin plus 5-FU to MTX was statistically significant (P less than .001), and the comparison of carboplatin plus 5-FU to MTX was of borderline statistical significance (P = .05). Median response durations and median survival times were similar for all three treatment groups. Logistic regression models showed that only treatment assigned was associated significantly with response (P = .001). Cox proportional hazards models indicated that only performance status was associated significantly with survival (P less than .01). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that combination chemotherapy resulted in improved response rates but was associated with an increased toxicity and no improvement in overall survival. Therefore, new treatments that may alter the course of disease in recurrent head and neck cancer patients still need to be identified.

The incidence and significance of thromboembolic complications in patients with high-grade gliomas.

Coagulation system abnormalities in patients with malignancy ranges from asymptomatic laboratory abnormalities to overt clinical manifestations. To determine the incidence and significance of clinically manifest thromboembolic phenomena in patients with high-grade gliomas, the records were analyzed of 77 patients that presented between January 1985 and June 1988. Fifteen patients (19%) had clinically manifest deep venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary emboli during the course of their disease. All these patients were ambulatory before and at the time of diagnosis of the event. The thromboembolic episodes occurred at the time of initial management of the primary tumor while there was documented clinical improvement in the functional status of the patient or at the time of progression of the disease. One patient died as a result of a pulmonary embolism; in two others, an embolism was a significant contributor to the patient's death. Anticoagulation resulted in complications in two of eight patients treated. Thromboembolic events occur with high frequency in patients with high-grade gliomas and contribute to the high morbidity and mortality seen in these patients. The optimum approach to screening and the treatment of these events has not been determined.

Phase II evaluation of amonafide in renal cell carcinoma. A Southwest Oncology Group study.

Twenty four patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma were treated in a phase II trial with amonafide 300-450 mg/m2/day on days 1-5 every 21 days. There were no responders, 6 patients had stable disease, 14 experienced progressive disease and 4 were assumed to be non-responders as no evaluation was performed. There were no fatal toxicities although 8 patients had grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia, 1 patient had grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Other toxicities included grade 3 diarrhea in 1 patient, grade 3 myopathy in 1 patient, severe nausea and vomiting in 1 patient and a facial rash, possibly a hypersensitivity reaction, in 1 patient. The median survival is 7.5 months. At this dosage and schedule, there is no evidence that amonafide has meaningful anti-tumor activity in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

The Wayne State University experience with adjuvant chemotherapy of head and neck cancer.

Because of the poor results of standard therapy in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers, chemotherapy is increasingly used to improve the outcome of these patients. In resectable disease, chemotherapy is being investigated before definitive treatments, after surgery, concurrent with postoperative radiotherapy, after radiotherapy, and for possible laryngeal salvage. In unresectable cancers, chemotherapy before, concurrent with, and following radiotherapy is being investigated.

The role of infection in the morbidity and mortality of patients with head and neck cancer undergoing multimodality therapy.

Cancer of the head and neck is a common cancer worldwide. The majority of patients present with locally advanced disease. Recently a great deal of improvement has been made in multimodality therapy of this disease, warranting more careful consideration of factors affecting quality of life, disease course, and treatment. Infection is clearly a factor. Analysis of 662 hospital admissions of 169 head and neck cancer patients was performed. A definite infection was documented in 86 febrile episodes, pneumonia contributed to 40%, bacteremia to 13%, skin and soft tissue infection to 12%, and tracheobronchitis to 10%. Among the evaluated risk factors, foreign bodies, specifically intravenous (IV) cannulae and gastrostomy tubes, race, performance status, alcohol intake, and nutritional status were statistically significant variables that predicted for or were associated with infection. Infection contributed to 44% of the deaths.

Evaluation of fludarabine phosphate in malignant melanoma. A Southwest Oncology Group study.

Twenty-seven evaluable patients with advanced malignant melanoma received fludarabine phosphate in a daily x 5 injection. Initial dosing was based on the presence of previous radiation therapy. There was no response seen in these patients despite appropriate dose escalation. Myelosuppression occurred without significant sequelae.

Phase II evaluation of 4'deoxydoxorubicin in advanced renal cell carcinoma.

4'Deoxydoxorubicin was evaluated in patients with advanced renal carcinoma. Only one partial remission was noted, and no significant cardiac toxicity was seen on serial evaluation of ejection fractions. Appropriate dose escalations were performed.

Metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of an unknown primary localized to the neck. Advantages of an aggressive treatment.

Treatment of patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of an unknown primary localized to the neck is still controversial, particularly regarding advanced disease. We reviewed 41 such patients treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy (RT) (n = 25) or with combined modality treatment including chemotherapy (CH) (n = 16). The male to female ratio was 28 to 13, and the median age was 58 years (range, 32 to 94 years). There were 27 (66%) patients with poorly differentiated SCC and 8 with moderately differentiated or well-differentiated cancer. Twenty-three (56%) patients had N3 disease, 16 (39%) had N2, and 2 had N1. The majority of N3 patients have been treated with CH and RT (n = 12) or with RT alone (n = 9). The combined CH-RT was well tolerated, with no life-threatening toxicity. The complete response (CR) to CH-RT was 81% (11 patients have no evidence of disease [NED] currently). The median survival time of this group was 37+ months. Of the 25 patients who had surgery and/or RT as their first planned treatment, 7 (28%) have NED currently. The median survival time of this group was 24 months. Patients with N3 disease who received CH had a higher CR rate and a longer survival time as compared with those treated with surgery and/or RT, despite a higher (N3) stage of disease. These findings warrant further investigation in randomized cooperative studies.

Cellular DNA content parameters in untreated and recurrent squamous cell cancers of the head and neck.

The presence and degree of DNA aneuploidy as measured by the DNA index (DI) and the S phase fraction (SPF) were determined by flow cytometry in 294 specimens from 237 patients with untreated and recurrent squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (SCCHN). A descriptive analysis was performed in which the specimen DNA parameters were correlated with stage, size of primary, degree of lymph node involvement, morphological grade, and treatment status of the corresponding patients. Approximately 70% of the previously untreated specimens contained DNA aneuploid populations (DI greater than 1.10) and three quarters had SPF that were above 15%. There was a strong, direct association between DI and SPF (P less than 0.001). There was no correlation of the presence or degree of DNA aneuploidy with the stage of the tumor or the size of the primary or conventional morphological grade of the tumor. Specimens from patients with recurrent tumors and untreated patients with N3 lymph nodes had significantly lower rates of DNA aneuploidy and mean DI. Serial determinations of DNA aneuploidy in patients with SCCHN undergoing cytotoxic therapy are ongoing and may prove useful in the identification and understanding of resistance and response in this tumor.

The clinical syndrome of 5-fluorouracil cardiotoxicity.

5-fluorouracil (FUra) is one of the most frequently used drugs in cancer treatment, particularly in combination with other agents. Its activity when administered as an infusion rather than a bolus has led to a renewed and increased use. A cardiotoxicity that mimics ischemia has been associated with the administration of FUra in cancer patients. This cardiotoxicity may manifest itself as: (a) dysrythmias with and without cardiorespiratory symptoms (b) ECG changes with and without cardiorespiratory symptoms (c) cardiorespiratory symptoms with and without ECG changes (d) acute myocardial infarct; symptoms and ECG changes (e) ventricular dysfunction (f) cardiogenic shock and (g) sudden death. Several case studies which illustrate the cardiotoxic sequelae that may be associated with the use of this drug are discussed. The incidence, contributing factors, risk factors and mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are undetermined. No appropriate recommendations for monitoring patients or for predicting those patients that will develop such toxicity while receiving FUra can be made at present. Prospective studies to determine the true incidence, spectrum and mechanisms causing this syndrome are ongoing and required for its understanding and prevention.

The correlation of specific variables of tumor differentiation with response rate and survival in patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with induction chemotherapy.

The authors have reported previously that conventionally defined grades of tumor morphology do not correlate with tumor response or survival in advanced squamous cell cancers of the head and neck (SCCHN) treated with cisplatinum combination induction therapy. This lack of correlation may be the result of the imprecision and subjectiveness of the conventional grade determination. To examine this possibility, response and survival were correlated with individual parameters of morphologic differentiation in 136 patients with advanced, untreated SCCHN. A multi-variable analysis of degree of keratinization, number of mitotic figures per high powered field, degree of nuclear differentiation, presence of vascular invasion, intensity of inflammatory response, and invasion pattern of the cancer was performed. The grade of each variable was weighted by assigning a score from 1 to 4, with 1 representing the most differentiated and 4 the least. The cumulative score of each specimen was tallied and assigned to one of three groups, less than 12, 12 to 18, and greater than 18, analogous to the conventional grades of well, moderately, and poorly differentiated, respectively. No correlation between the grade of individual morphologic variables and response to chemotherapy was demonstrated, or between tumor response and cumulative score groups. There was no correlation of the grade of individual morphologic variables or cumulative score groups with survival. Only the survival of patients achieving a complete response to chemotherapy was correlated with the cumulative score groups: 2-year survivals of 84%, 70%, and 46% for less than 12, 12 to 18, and greater than 18, respectively. Multi-parameter analysis of individual features of tumor differentiation is not superior to conventional morphologic analysis in predicting response to chemotherapy or survival in patients with advanced SCCHN.