Clinically localized type 1 and 2 papillary renal cell carcinomas have similar survival outcomes following surgery / Los carcinomas papilares de células renales tipo 1 y 2 localizados clínicamente tienen resultados de supervivencia similares después de la cirugía

Propósito Se intentó determinar la incidencia, hallazgos patológicos, factores pronósticos y resultados clínicos para pacientes con CCR papilar clínicamente localizado. Métodos Demográfico, Se recopilaron hallazgos clínicos y patológicos en todos los pacientes con CCRP sometidos a cirugía en cuatro centros médicos académicos. El punto final primario fue la supervivencia específica del cáncer (CSS). La supervivencia sin recaída (RFS) y la supervivencia general (OS) fueron puntos finales secundarios. Kaplan- Se obtuvieron estimaciones de Meier y se usaron modelos de regresión de riesgos proporcionales de Cox para evaluar predictores de mortalidad y recaída. Resultados Identificamos 626 CCPR, de los cuales 373 (60por ciento) fueron del tipo 1 y 253 (40 por ciento) fueron del tipo 2, con tres cuartas partes de todos los tumores siendo pT1. En comparación con los pacientes con tipo 1, aquellos con tipo 2 eran mayores (edad media: 63 frente a 61; (AU)

Purpose We aimed to determine incidence, pathologic fndings, prognostic factors and clinical outcomes for patients with clinically localized papillary RCC. Methods Demographic, clinical and pathologic fndings were collected on all patients with PRCC undergoing sur-gery at four academic medical centers. The primary end-point was cancer-specifc survival (CSS). Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were secondary endpoints. Kaplan­ Meier estimates were obtained, and Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to assess predictors of mortality and relapse. Results We identifed 626 PRCC, of which 373 (60 pertcent) were type 1 and 253 (40 pertcent) were type 2, with three-quar-ters of all tumors being pT1. Compared to patients with type 1, those with type 2 were older (mean age: 63 vs 61; (AU)

Robotic­assisted pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: frequency of nodal metastases and oncological outcomes

Purpose Limited data are available regarding the oncologic efficacy of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) performed during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) for prostate cancer. We aimed to determine the frequency of pelvic lymph node metastasis and oncological outcomes following RALP with PLND in patients who did not receive adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Methods We retrospectively reviewed the records of 1740 consecutive patients who underwent RALP and extended PLND. The primary endpoint was biochemical recurrence (BCR). The estimated BCR probability was obtained using the Kaplan­Meier method. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to assess for predictors of BCR. Results One hundred and eight patients (6 pertcent) with positive LNs were identified. The median number of LNs removed was 17 (IQR 11­24), and median follow-up was 26 months (IQR 14­43). Ninety-one (84 pertcent) patients did not receive adjuvant ADT of whom 60 pertcent had BCR with a median time to recurrence of 8 months. The 1- and 3-year BCR-free probability was 42 and 28 pertcent, respectively. Patients with ≤2 LN+ had significantly better biochemicalfree estimated probability compared to those with >2 LN+ (p = 0.002). The total number of LN+ (HR = 1.1; 95 pertcent CI 1.01­1.2, p = 0.04) and Gleason 8­10 (HR = 1.96; 95 perrtcent CI 1.1­3.4, p = 0.02) were predictors of BCR on multivariate analysis. Conclusion Among men with positive lymph nodes at time of robotic prostatectomy, those with two or fewer positive nodes and Gleason <8 exhibited favorable biochemical-free survival without adjuvant therapy.(AU) Cerrar

The expression of syndecan-1 and -2 is associated with Gleason score and epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers, E-cadherin and beta-catenin, in prostate cancer.

The epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is considered a key step in tumor progression, where the invasive cancer cells change from epithelial to mesenchymal phenotype. During this process, a decrease or loss in adhesion molecules expression and an increase in migration molecules expression are observed. The aim of this work was to determine the expression and cellular distribution of syndecan-1 and -2 (migration molecules) and E-cadherin and beta-catenin (adhesion molecules) in different stages of prostate cancer progression. A quantitative immunohistochemical study of these molecules was carried out in tissue samples from benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate carcinoma, with low and high Gleason score, obtained from biopsies archives of the Clinic Hospital of the University of Chile and Dipreca Hospital. Polyclonal specific antibodies and amplification system of estreptavidin-biotin peroxidase and diaminobenzidine were used. Syndecan-1 was uniformly expressed in basolateral membranes of normal epithelium, changing to a granular cytoplasmatic expression pattern in carcinomas. Syndecan-2 was observed mainly in a cytoplasmatic granular pattern, with high immunostaining intensity in areas of low Gleason score. E-cadherin was detected in basolateral membrane of normal epithelia showing decreased expression in high Gleason score samples. beta-Catenin was found in cell membranes of normal epithelia changing its distribution toward the nucleus and cytoplasm in carcinoma samples. We concluded that changes in expression and cell distribution of E-cadherin and beta-catenin correlated with the progression degree of prostate adenocarcinoma, suggesting a role of these molecules as markers of progression and prognosis. Furthermore, changes in the pattern expression of syndecan-1 and -2 indicate that both molecules may be involved in the EMT and tumor progression of prostate cancer.