Initial experience of abdominal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer using the da Vinci single port system.

From November 2021 to February 2022, 15 patients underwent total abdominal mesorectal excision for rectal cancer using the da Vinci single port system. The clinical and pathological results were analyzed retrospectively. All surgeries were performed without conversion. The mean distance from the tumor to the anal verge was 10 cm (range, 2-15 cm). The mean operative time was 191 minutes, the median docking time was 4 minutes (range, 2-10 minutes), and the estimated blood loss was 20 mL (range, 20-50 mL). The mean number of lymph nodes harvested was 16.5, the mean distal resection margin was 3.52 cm, and all patients had circumferential and distal tumor-free resection margins. One patient had minor anastomotic leakage. The mean length of hospital stay was 5.8 ± 2.5 days. Abdominal total mesorectal excision using the da Vinci single port system for rectal cancer is technically feasible and safe, with acceptable pathological and short-term clinical outcomes.

A comparative study on the short-term clinical outcomes of Da Vinci SP versus Da Vinci Xi for rectal cancer surgery.

PURPOSE: The Da Vinci SP robot system was recently introduced, but its safety and feasibility for rectal cancer compared with the currently used robot system have not been reported. METHODS: This was a single-centre retrospective study. Data from patients who underwent abdominal total mesorectal excision (TME) from October 2015 to October 2022 were analysed. After propensity score matching, the short-term outcomes were compared. RESULTS: A total of 56 patient data were analysed. Intersphincteric resection was more common in the SP group (7 cases (25%) vs. 0 case (0%), p = 0.001). The operation time was significantly shorter in SP (184 vs. 227.5 min, p < 0.0001), but the docking time was similar. The postoperative complications were similar. There were no differences in the postoperative pain score and length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION: The SP robotic system for abdominal TME has acceptable short-term and is safe and technically feasible.

Immediate urinary catheter removal after colorectal surgery with the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol.

PURPOSE: The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol for colorectal surgery recommends early urinary catheter (UC) removal after surgery. However, the optimal timing remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate the safety of immediate UC removal and risk factors of postoperative urinary retention (POUR) after colorectal cancer surgery. METHODS: From November 2019 and April 2022, patients who underwent elective colorectal cancer surgery at Seoul St. Mary's hospital were collected retrospectively. A UC was inserted in the operating room after general anesthesia and removed in the operating room immediately after surgery. The primary outcome was the occurrence of POUR following immediate UC removal after surgery, and the secondary outcomes were the identification of POUR-related risk factors and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Among 737 patients, 81 (10%) had POUR immediately after UC removal. No patient had urinary tract infection. The incidence of POUR was significantly higher in male and in those with a history of urinary disease. However, there were no significant differences in tumor location, surgical procedure, or approach. The mean operative time was significantly longer in the POUR group. Postoperative morbidity and mortality rates did not differ significantly between two groups. Multivariate analysis showed that risk factors for POUR were male, a history of urinary disease, and intrathecal morphine injection. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate removal of UC immediately after colorectal surgery is safe and feasible in the trend of ERAS. Male, a history of benign prostatic hyperplasia, and intrathecal morphine injection were risk factors for POUR.

Postoperative effects of laparoscopic Hartmann reversal: A multicenter propensity score matched study.

BACKGROUND: Although the advantages of laparoscopic Hartmann reversal (LHR) compared to open Hartmann reversal (OHR) have been reported in the literature, the number of multicenter studies with good matching investigating this topic is rare. In the present study, we aimed to confirm the advantages of LHR in terms of short-term outcomes through propensity score matching of LHR and OHR groups, using data collected from multiple institutions. METHODS: Patients who underwent Hartmann reversal at six institutions under the Catholic Medical Center of the Catholic University of Korea between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2021, were included. The patients were divided into the LHR and OHR groups based on the technique used. The two groups were matched using propensity score matching (1:1 ratio, logistic regression with the nearest-neighbor method). The primary outcome was postoperative ileus (POI) frequency, and secondary outcomes were time to solid diet (days) and length of stay (days). RESULTS: Among 337 patients, propensity score matching was performed on 322, after excluding 15 who had undergone open conversion. Of these, 63 patients were assigned to each group through propensity score matching. There was no difference in the frequency of adhesiolysis (77.8% vs. 82.5%, p = 0.503) or the operation time. (210 (IQR 159-290) vs. 233 (IQR 160-280), p = 0.718) between the two groups. As the primary outcome, the LHR group showed significantly lower POI frequency than the OHR group. (4.8% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.0041) Regarding the secondary outcomes, the LHR group showed a shorter period to solid diet than the OHR group. The length of hospital stay was also significantly shorter in the LHR group (4 vs. 6, p < 0.0001; 9 vs. 12, p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: LHR is an effective method to ensure faster recovery of patients after surgery compared to OHR.

How to do a single-port robotic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair using the da Vinci SP platform.

Although 8 years have passed since the introduction of the da Vinci SP robotic system, rTEP surgery using the SP robot has never been introduced due to technical barriers. Through this study, we would like to share the possibility of safe and feasible TEP by da Vinci SP robotic platform beyond the technical barriers. As far as we know, SP robotic TEP implemented in our institution is the first introduced case, and I think it will be good information for surgeons who are thinking about TEP using SP robot.

Oncological impact of vascular invasion in colon cancer might differ depending on tumor sidedness.

Purpose: Vascular invasion is a well-known independent prognostic factor in colon cancer and tumor sidedness is also being considered a prognostic factor. The aim of this study was to compare the oncological impact of vascular invasion depending on the tumor location in stages I to III colon cancer. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed using data from patients who underwent curative resection between 2004 and 2015. Patients were divided into right-sided colon cancer (RCC) and left-sided colon cancer (LCC) groups according to the tumor location. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the RCC and LCC groups, depending on the presence of vascular invasion. Results: A total of 793 patients were included, of which 304 (38.3%) had RCC and 489 (61.7%) had LCC. DFS and OS did not differ significantly between the RCC and LCC groups. Vascular invasion was a poor prognostic factor for DFS in both RCC (hazard ratio [HR], 2.291; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.186-4.425; p = 0.010) and LCC (HR, 1.848; 95% CI, 1.139-2.998; p = 0.011). Additionally, it was associated with significantly worse OS in the RCC (HR, 3.503; 95% CI, 1.681-7.300; p < 0.001), but not in the LCC group (HR, 1.676; 95% CI, 0.885-3.175; p = 0.109). Multivariate analysis revealed that vascular invasion was independently poor prognostic factor for OS in the RCC (HR, 3.186; 95% CI, 1.391-7.300; p = 0.006). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that RCC with vascular invasion had worse OS than LCC with vascular invasion.

Implementation and improvement of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols for colorectal cancer surgery.

Purpose: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) reduces postoperative complications and shortens hospital stays. We aimed to describe the implementation and improvement of ERAS protocols in our institution through a multidisciplinary team approach. Methods: A multidisciplinary team comprised of colorectal surgeons, anesthesiologists, nurses, pharmacists, nutritionists, and a performance improvement team was launched to develop the ERAS protocol. The ERAS protocol was followed in patients who underwent colonic and rectal surgery between January and November 2017. The ERAS protocol comprised 22 elements in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases. After the initial application, ERAS compliance was monitored and audited every 4-6 months and improvements made as necessary. Results: The length of hospital stay significantly decreased after the application of the ERAS protocols for colon cancer in 2017 and 2018. And there was no significant difference in the duration of hospital stay after applying the rectal cancer ERAS protocol. Moreover, after starting the colon ERAS, there was a significant decrease in the complication rate. Since December 2017, there was a continuous increase in the colorectal ERAS clinical pathway application rate, which remained high (>90%). The patient compliance rate significantly increased between 2017 and 2018, but slightly decreased again in 2019. Conclusion: The application and continual improvement of an ERAS protocol are crucial. Improving compliance may result in better clinical outcomes. Additionally, the basic guidelines of ERAS must be applied and developed according to each hospital's situation based on the team approach.

Initial experience of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with D3 lymph node dissection for right colon cancer using Artisential®, a new laparoscopic articulating instrument.

Background: Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME) with D3 lymph node dissection for the right colon is becoming popular, but still technically challenging. Several articulating laparoscopic instruments had been introduced to reduce technical difficulties; however, those were not practical. This study aimed to report the first clinical experience of using ArtiSential®, a new laparoscopic articulating instrument in laparoscopic complete mesocolic with D3 lymph node dissection for right colon cancer. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective, single-institution, consecutive case study. From October 2018 to March 2020, a total of 33 patients underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy using ArtiSential®, a new articulating instrument. We compared the short-term outcomes of patients who underwent surgery using ArtiSential® (AG) to the conventional instrument (CG). Results: In total, there were 33 cases in AG and 43 cases in CG. There were no significant differences in operation time (141.0 ± 22.5 vs. 156.0 ± 50.6 min, P = 0.09), mean estimated blood loss (46.8 ± 36.2 vs. 100.8 ± 300.6 ml, P = 0.31) and intra-operative and post-operative complications. However, the number of harvested lymph nodes was higher and the length of hospital stay was shorter in AG than in CG (32.6 ± 12.2 vs. 24.6 ± 7.4, P < 0.01 and 3.0 ± 1.2 vs. 4.1 ± 2.2 days, P = 0.01, respectively). Conclusions: Laparoscopic CME with D3 lymph node dissection for right colon cancer using ArtiSential®, the new articulating laparoscopic instrument is safe and technically feasible.

Wound Irrigation Using Wet Gauze May Reduce Surgical Site Infection Following Laparoscopic Appendectomy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes of wet gauze and conventional irrigation after laparoscopic appendectomy to determine whether wet gauze irrigation can help reduce surgical site infection (SSI). METHODS: A total of 308 patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy were included in this study between December 2018 and May 2020. Of these, 132 (42.9%) received gauze irrigation (group 1), and 176 patients (57.1%) received conventional irrigation (group 2). Pre-operative outcomes and complications, including SSI, were compared after propensity score matching (PSM) to adjust for baseline differences and selection bias. RESULTS: After 1:1 PSM, 92 well-matched patients in each group were evaluated. Regarding perioperative outcomes between groups 1 and 2, the rate of severe complications (Clavien-Dindo Classification grades III, IV, and V), operative time, and readmission rate did not differ between the groups. Superficial/deep SSIs were observed more frequently in group 2 (8/92 cases) than in group 1 (1/92 cases; p = 0.017). The organ/space SSIs rate was not significantly different between the two groups (1/92 group 1 and 0/92 group 2, p = 0.316). However, post-operative hospital stay was significantly longer in group 2 (2.8 ± 1.3 days) than in group 1 (1.6 ± 1.2 days; p < 0.001). In the univariate analyses, wound irrigation using wet gauze was an independent protective factor for superficial or deep SSI (p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: Wound irrigation using wet gauze after fascia closure has a significant beneficial effect on reducing post-operative superficial/deep SSI following laparoscopic appendectomy.

Clinical effect of rectus sheath block compared to intrathecal morphine injection for minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery: a propensity score-matched study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the postoperative outcomes of a multimodal perioperative pain management protocol with rectus sheath blocks (RSBs) or intrathecal morphine (ITM) injection for minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery. METHODS: A total of 112 patients underwent minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Forty-one patients underwent RSB (group 1), whereas 71 patients underwent ITM (group 2) in addition to multimodal pain management using enhanced recovery after the surgery protocol. To adjust for the baseline differences and selection bias, baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared using propensity score matching. RESULTS: Forty patients were evaluated in each group. There was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay between the two groups. According to the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) score, the postoperative complication rate was significantly lower in the RSB group (3.0 ± 7.8) than in the ITM group (8.1 ± 10.9; p = 0.016). During the first 24 h after surgery, the median postoperative visual analog scale score was significantly higher in the RSB group than in the ITM group (2.0 ± 1.1 vs. 1.5 ± 1.2; p = 0.048). Postoperative morphine use was also significantly higher in the RSB group than in the ITM group in the first 24 h (23.7 ± 19.8 vs 11.6 ± 15.6%; p = 0.003) and 48 h (16.9 ± 24.8 vs. 7.5 ± 11.9; p = 0.036) after surgery. Significant urinary retention occurred after the in the RSB and ITM groups (5% vs. 45%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Although the RSB group had higher morphine use during the first 48 h after surgery, the length of hospital stay remained the same and the complications were less in terms of the CCI score. Thus, transperitoneal RSB is a safe and feasible approach for postoperative pain management following minimally invasive procedures.