Real-World Evidence on the Clinical Characteristics and Management of Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in Spain Using Natural Language Processing: The SRealCLL Study.

The SRealCLL study aimed to obtain real-world evidence on the clinical characteristics and treatment patterns of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) using natural language processing (NLP). Electronic health records (EHRs) from seven Spanish hospitals (January 2016-December 2018) were analyzed using EHRead® technology, based on NLP and machine learning. A total of 534 CLL patients were assessed. No treatment was detected in 270 (50.6%) patients (watch-and-wait, W&W). First-line (1L) treatment was identified in 230 (43.1%) patients and relapsed/refractory (2L) treatment was identified in 58 (10.9%). The median age ranged from 71 to 75 years, with a uniform male predominance (54.8-63.8%). The main comorbidities included hypertension (W&W: 35.6%; 1L: 38.3%; 2L: 39.7%), diabetes mellitus (W&W: 24.4%; 1L: 24.3%; 2L: 31%), cardiac arrhythmia (W&W: 16.7%; 1L: 17.8%; 2L: 17.2%), heart failure (W&W 16.3%, 1L 17.4%, 2L 17.2%), and dyslipidemia (W&W: 13.7%; 1L: 18.7%; 2L: 19.0%). The most common antineoplastic treatment was ibrutinib in 1L (64.8%) and 2L (62.1%), followed by bendamustine + rituximab (12.6%), obinutuzumab + chlorambucil (5.2%), rituximab + chlorambucil (4.8%), and idelalisib + rituximab (3.9%) in 1L and venetoclax (15.5%), idelalisib + rituximab (6.9%), bendamustine + rituximab (3.5%), and venetoclax + rituximab (3.5%) in 2L. This study expands the information available on patients with CLL in Spain, describing the diversity in patient characteristics and therapeutic approaches in clinical practice.

Evaluation of the novel therapeutic anti-CCR7 antibody CAP-100 as an add-on therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients receiving venetoclax.

The Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib and the B-cell lymphoma 2 anti-apoptotic protein inhibitor venetoclax provide high response rates in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, there is a growing number of patients that relapse after treatment or show refractory disease, thus new targets and agents are still needed. We have previously reported the chemokine receptor CCR7 as a relevant deregulated target in CLL and have developed CAP-100, a novel therapeutic anti-CCR7 antibody that is under evaluation for relapse/refractory CLL (NCT04704323). While CCR7 expression has been shown to be down-modulated in CLL patients treated with ibrutinib, whether venetoclax acts in a similar manner remains unaddressed. Here, we aimed to document the impact of venetoclax on CCR7 expression in CLL cells, as well as on the pre-clinical activity of CAP-100. To this end, we addressed CCR7 expression by flow cytometry and the antibody efficacy by means of in vitro chemotactic and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) assays. Our data indicate that venetoclax treatment did not significantly modify CCR7 expression pattern nor CAP-100 mechanisms of action. Together, these findings support CAP-100 as an adjuvant therapy to venetoclax that may introduce additional modes of action in CLL therapy.

Ibrutinib Does Not Impact CCR7-Mediated Homeostatic Migration in T-Cells from Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients.

Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib has significantly changed treatment landscape in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Growing evidence supports ibrutinib to work beyond the effect on tumor cells by means of, for example, restoring functionality of the T-cell compartment and increasing circulating T-cell numbers. Recent evidence suggests T-cell enhanced expansion, rather than increased egress from secondary lymphoid organs (SLO), as a root cause for ibrutinib-induced lymphocytosis. However, whether the latter physiological change is also a consequence of a forced retention in blood remains undisclosed. Since CCR7 is the main chemokine receptor taking over the homing of T-cells from peripheral compartments to lymph nodes and other SLO, we aimed to investigate the impact of ibrutinib on CCR7 functionality in T-cells. To this end, we documented receptor expression in T-cells from a large cohort of ibrutinib-treated CLL patients, and performed different in vivo and in vitro migration models. Overall, our data confirm that CCR7 expression or receptor-mediated migration in CLL T-cells is not affected by ibrutinib. Furthermore, it does not modulate CCR7-driven homing nor nodal interstitial migration. Together, our results support that ibrutinib-induced CLL T-cell accumulation in the blood stream is not derived from an impairment of CCR7-driven recirculation between the SLO and bloodstream, and therefore T-cell expansion is the most plausible cause.

Effect of ibrutinib on CCR7 expression and functionality in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and its implication for the activity of CAP-100, a novel therapeutic anti-CCR7 antibody.

CAP-100 is a novel therapeutic antibody directed against the ligand binding site of human CCR7. This chemokine receptor is overexpressed in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and orchestrates the homing of CLL cells into the lymph node. Previous studies, on a very limited number of samples, hypothesized that the Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) ibrutinib might induce loss of surface CCR7 levels in CLL cells. CAP-100 will be evaluated in clinical trials as a therapy for relapse/refractory CLL patients, who have received at least two systemic therapies (NCT04704323). As nowadays many relapse/refractory CLL patients will have received ibrutinib as a prior therapy, we aimed to investigate in a large cohort of CLL patients the impact of this BTKi on CCR7 expression and functionality as well as on the therapeutic activity of CAP-100. Our data confirm that ibrutinib moderately down-regulates the very high expression of CCR7 in CLL cells but has no apparent effect on CCR7-induced chemotaxis. Moreover, CLL cells are perfectly targetable by CAP-100 which led to a complete inhibition of CCR7-mediated migration and induced strong target cell killing through antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, irrespective of previous or contemporary ibrutinib administration. Together, these results validate the therapeutic utility of CAP-100 as a next-line single-agent therapy for CLL patients who failed to ibrutinib and confirm that CAP-100 and ibrutinib have complementary non-overlapping mechanisms of action, potentially allowing for combination therapy.

Real-World Characteristics and Outcome of Patients Treated With Single-Agent Ibrutinib for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in Spain (IBRORS-LLC Study).

BACKGROUND: Ibrutinib demonstrated remarkable efficacy and favorable tolerability in patients with untreated or relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), including those with high-risk genetic alterations. The IBRORS-CLL study assessed the characteristics, clinical management and outcome of CLL patients receiving ibrutinib in routine clinical practice in Spain. PATIENTS: Observational, retrospective, multicenter study in CLL patients who started single-agent ibrutinib as first-line treatment or at first or second relapse between January 2016 and January 2019. RESULTS: A total of 269 patients were included (median age: 70.9 years; cardiovascular comorbidity: 55.4%, including hypertension [47.6%] and atrial fibrillation [AF] [7.1%]). Overall, 96.7% and 69% of patients underwent molecular testing for del(17p)/TP53 mutation and IGHV mutation status. High-risk genetic features included unmutated IGHV (79%) and del(17p)/TP53 mutation (first-line: 66.3%; second-line: 23.1%). Overall, 84 (31.2%) patients received ibrutinib as first-line treatment, and it was used as second- and third-line therapy in 121 (45.0%) and 64 (23.8%) patients. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were not reached irrespective of del(17p)/TP53, or unmutated IGHV. Common grade ≥3 adverse events were infections (12.2%) and bleeding (3%). Grade ≥3 AF occurred in 1.5% of patients. CONCLUSION: This real-world study shows that single-agent ibrutinib is an effective therapy for CLL, regardless of age and high-risk molecular features, consistent with clinical trials. Additionally, single-agent ibrutinib was well tolerated, with a low rate of cardiovascular events. This study also emphasized a high molecular testing rate of del(17p)/TP53 mutation and IGHV mutation status in clinical practice according to guideline recommendations.

Targeting cancer homing into the lymph node with a novel anti-CCR7 therapeutic antibody: the paradigm of CLL.

Lymph node (LN) is a key tissue in the pathophysiology of mature blood cancers, especially for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Within the multiple de-regulated pathways affecting CLL homeostasis, the CC-chemokine receptor 7 (CCR7) grants homing of CLL cells into the LN where protective environments foster tumor progression. To cover the lack of specific therapies targeting the CCR7-dependence of CLL to enter into the LN, and aiming to displace the disease from LN, we generated CAP-100, an antibody that specifically binds to hCCR7 and neutralizes its ligand-binding site and signaling. In various in vitro and in vivo preclinical models CAP-100 strongly inhibited CCR7-induced migration, extravasation, homing, and survival in CLL samples. Moreover, it triggered potent tumor cell killing, mediated by host immune mechanisms, and was effective in xenograft models of high-risk disease. Additionally, CAP-100 showed a favorable toxicity profile on relevant hematopoietic subsets. Our results validated CAP-100 as a novel therapeutic tool to prevent the access of CLL cells, and other neoplasia with nodal-dependence, into the LN niches, thus hitting a central hub in the pathogenesis of cancer. The first-in-human clinical trial (NCT04704323), which will evaluate this novel therapeutic approach in CLL patients, is pending.

Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma after acute myeloid leukemia: Alleged common pathogenesis. A case report and literature review.

The genomic landscape of AITL is characterized by mutation of epigenetic modifiers. This gene expression pattern resembles myeloid diseases and shows a potential role for hypomethylating agents as possible therapy for AITL.

CCR7 as a novel therapeutic target in t-cell PROLYMPHOCYTIC leukemia.

T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia (T-PLL) is a poor prognostic disease with very limited options of efficient therapies. Most patients are refractory to chemotherapies and despite high response rates after alemtuzumab, virtually all patients relapse. Therefore, there is an unmet medical need for novel therapies in T-PLL. As the chemokine receptor CCR7 is a molecule expressed in a wide range of malignancies and relevant in many tumor processes, the present study addressed the biologic role of this receptor in T-PLL. Furthermore, we elucidated the mechanisms of action mediated by an anti-CCR7 monoclonal antibody (mAb) and evaluated whether its anti-tumor activity would warrant development towards clinical applications in T-PLL. Our results demonstrate that CCR7 is a prognostic biomarker for overall survival in T-PLL patients and a functional receptor involved in the migration, invasion, and survival of leukemic cells. Targeting CCR7 with a mAb inhibited ligand-mediated signaling pathways and induced tumor cell killing in primary samples. In addition, directing antibodies against CCR7 was highly effective in T-cell leukemia xenograft models. Together, these findings make CCR7 an attractive molecule for novel mAb-based therapeutic applications in T-PLL, a disease where recent drug screen efforts and studies addressing new compounds have focused on chemotherapy or small molecules. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s40364-020-00234-z.

Final 5-year findings from the phase 3 HELIOS study of ibrutinib plus bendamustine and rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma.

We report final analysis outcomes from the phase 3 HELIOS study (NCT01611090). Patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma without deletion 17p (n = 578) were randomized 1:1 to 420 mg daily ibrutinib or placebo plus ≤6 cycles of bendamustine plus rituximab (BR), followed by ibrutinib or placebo alone. Median follow-up was 63.7 months. Median investigator-assessed progression-free survival was longer with ibrutinib plus BR (65.1 months) than placebo plus BR (14.3 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.229 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.183-0.286]; p < .0001). Despite crossover of 63.3% of patients from the placebo plus BR arm to ibrutinib treatment upon disease progression, ibrutinib plus BR versus placebo plus BR demonstrated an overall survival benefit (HR 0.611 [95% CI 0.455-0.822]; p = .0010; median not reached in either arm). Long-term follow-up data confirm the survival benefit of ibrutinib plus BR over BR alone. Safety profiles were consistent with those known for ibrutinib and BR.

Clinical outcome and prognostic factors of patients with Richter syndrome: real-world study of the Spanish Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Study Group (GELLC).

Richter syndrome (RS) is an uncommon evolution of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) with a dismal prognosis. Clinical-biological features predicting outcome and best therapeutic approach for these patients remain to be established. In this study, 128 patients with RS, including 112 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)-type RS, 15 Hodgkin lymphoma (HL)-type RS, and one plasmablastic lymphoma, were identified in 11 centres of the Spanish CLL Study Group (GELLC). The median overall survival (OS) was 5·9 months for DLBCL-type RS and 30·8 months for HL-type RS. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, haemoglobin level, platelet count, serum lactate dehydrogenase and ß2-microglobulin levels, tumour protein p53 (TP53) abnormalities in the CLL clone concomitant to RS, number of prior therapies, and clonal relationship between CLL and RS, were associated with OS in patients with DLBCL-type RS. A platelet count of <100 × 109 /l, prior CLL therapy (0 vs. ≥1), and presence of TP53 alterations maintained an independent prognostic impact in the multivariate analysis. Patients without any of these factors had a better clinical outcome, with a median OS of 75·3 months, while patients with one or two or more of these factors presented a median OS of 25·5 and 3 months, respectively. Although OS of patients with RS is generally poor, a proportion of patients achieved prolonged survival. Treatment of RS remains a medical need, and further therapeutic approaches with novel therapies are warranted.

Frontline treatment with the combination obinutuzumab ± chlorambucil for chronic lymphocytic leukemia outside clinical trials: Results of a multinational, multicenter study by ERIC and the Israeli CLL study group.

In recent years, considerable progress has been made in frontline therapy for elderly/physically unfit patients with CLL. The combination of obinutuzumab and chlorambucil (O-Clb) has been shown to prolong progression free survival (PFS, median PFS-31.5 months) and overall survival (OS) compared to chlorambucil alone. More recently, obinutuzumab given in combination with either ibrutinib or venetoclax improved PFS but not OS when compared to O-Clb. In this retrospective multinational, multicenter co-operative study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of frontline treatment with O ± Clb in unfit patients with CLL, in a "real-world" setting. Patients with documented del (17p13.1)/TP53 mutation were excluded. A total of 437 patients (median age, 75.9 years; median CIRS score, 8; median creatinine clearance, 61.1 mL/min) were included. The clinical overall response rate was 80.3% (clinical complete and partial responses in 38.7% and 41.6% of patients, respectively). Median observation time was 14.1 months and estimated median PFS was 27.6 months (95% CI, 24.2-31.0). In a multivariate analysis, high-risk disease [del (11q22.3) and/or IGHV-unmutated], lymph nodes of diameter > 5 cm, obinutuzumab monotherapy and reduced cumulative dose of obinutuzumab, were all independently associated with shorter PFS. The median OS has not yet been reached and estimated 2-year OS is 88%. In conclusion, in a "real-world" setting, frontline treatment with O-Clb achieves PFS comparable to that reported in clinical trials. Inferior outcomes were noted in patients with del (11q22.3) and/or unmutated IGHV and those treated with obinutuzumab-monotherapy. Thus, O-Clb can be still considered as legitimate frontline therapy for unfit CLL patients with low-risk disease.

Systemic Exposure of Rituximab Increased by Ibrutinib: Pharmacokinetic Results and Modeling Based on the HELIOS Trial.

INTRODUCTION: In the HELIOS trial, bendamustine/rituximab (BR) plus ibrutinib (BR-I) improved disease outcomes versus BR plus placebo in previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma. Here, we describe the pharmacokinetic (PK) observations, along with modeling to further explore the interaction between ibrutinib and rituximab. METHODS: 578 subjects were randomized to ibrutinib or placebo with BR (6 cycles). Ibrutinib PK samples and tumor measurements were obtained from all subjects; a subset was evaluated for bendamustine and rituximab PK. Population rituximab PK was assessed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. RESULTS: Dose-normalized plasma concentration-time bendamustine data were comparable between the arms. Systemic rituximab exposure was higher with BR-I versus BR; mean trough serum concentrations were 2- to 3-fold higher in the first three cycles and 1.2- to 1.7-fold higher subsequently. No relevant safety differences were observed. In the modeling, including treatment arm as a categorical covariate and tumor burden as a continuous time-varying covariate on overall rituximab clearance significantly improved fitting of the data. CONCLUSIONS: BR-I led to higher dose-normalized systemic rituximab exposure versus BR and more rapid steady-state achievement. The modeling data suggest that rituximab disposition is, at least in part, target mediated. Determining the clinical significance of these findings requires further assessments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01611090 .

Improvement of fatigue, physical functioning, and well-being among patients with severe impairment at baseline receiving ibrutinib in combination with bendamustine and rituximab for relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma in the HELIOS study.

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an important endpoint, especially in clinical trials for malignancies with a long course of disease, such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Patient-reported outcomes were examined in the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled HELIOS study to assess the impact of treatment with the Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib, added to bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) background therapy. Measures included FACIT-Fatigue, EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-CLL16, and EQ-5D-5L. Of 578 patients enrolled, 540 (93%) provided FACIT-Fatigue responses at baseline. Most had only a moderate degree of impairment at baseline; mean values did not appear to change over time in either treatment arm, suggesting that adding ibrutinib to BR did not impact health-related quality of life. However, post-hoc analyses showed that subgroups of patients with the worst fatigue, physical functional status, and well-being at baseline had greater improvements in these outcomes with ibrutinib plus BR treatment versus placebo.

Efficacy and safety of idelalisib in combination with ofatumumab for previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Idelalisib, a selective inhibitor of PI3Kδ, is approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) in combination with rituximab. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of idelalisib in combination with a second-generation anti-CD20 antibody, ofatumumab, in a similar patient population. METHODS: In this global, open-label, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients with relapsed CLL progressing less than 24 months from last therapy. Patients refractory to ofatumumab were excluded. Patients were stratified by relapsed versus refractory disease, presence or absence of del(17p) or TP53 mutation, or both, and IGHV mutated versus unmutated. We randomised patients in a 2:1 ratio using a web-based interactive system that generated a unique treatment code, and assigned patients to receive either idelalisib plus ofatumumab (oral idelalisib 150 mg twice daily continuously plus ofatumumab 300 mg intravenously in week 1, then 1000 mg intravenously weekly for 7 weeks, and every 4 weeks for 16 weeks) or ofatumumab alone (ofatumumab dosing as per the combination group, except 2000 mg was substituted for the 1000 mg dose). An independent review committee assessed response, including progressive disease, based on imaging using modified International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 2008 criteria. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by an independent review committee in the intention-to-treat population. We did a primary analysis (data cutoff Jan 15, 2015) and an updated analysis (data cutoff Sept 1, 2015). This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT01659021. FINDINGS: Between Dec 17, 2012, and March 31, 2014, we enrolled 261 patients (median age 68 years [IQR 61-74], median previous therapies three [IQR 2-4]). At the primary analysis, median progression-free survival was 16·3 months (95% CI 13·6-17·8) in the idelalisib plus ofatumumab group and 8·0 months (5·7-8·2) in the ofatumumab group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·27, 95% CI 0·19-0·39, p<0·0001). The most frequent grade 3 or worse adverse events in the idelalisib plus ofatumumab group were neutropenia (59 [34%] patients vs 14 [16%] in the ofatumumab group), diarrhoea (34 [20%] vs one [1%]), and pneumonia (25 [14%] vs seven [8%]). The most frequent grade 3 or worse adverse events in the ofatumumab group were neutropenia (14 [16%]), pneumonia (seven [8%]), and thrombocytopenia (six [7%] vs 19 [11%] in the idelalisib plus ofatumumab group). Serious infections were more common in the idelalisib plus ofatumumab group and included pneumonia (23 [13%] patients in the idelalisib plus ofatumumab group vs nine [10%] in the ofatumumab group), sepsis (11 [6%] vs one [1%]), and Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (eight [5%] vs one [1%]). 22 treatment-related deaths occurred in the idelalisib plus ofatumumab group (the most common being sepsis, septic shock, viral sepsis, and pneumonia). Six treatment-related deaths occurred in the ofatumumab group (the most common being progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and pneumonia). INTERPRETATION: The idelalisib plus ofatumumab combination resulted in better progression-free survival compared with ofatumumab alone in patients with relapsed CLL, including in those with high-risk disease, and thus might represent a new treatment alternative for this patient population. FUNDING: Gilead Sciences, Inc.

Randomized phase 2 study of otlertuzumab and bendamustine versus bendamustine in patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.

Otlertuzumab (TRU-016) is a humanized anti-CD37 protein therapeutic that triggers direct caspase-independent apoptosis of malignant B cells and induces antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) received either otlertuzumab (20 mg/kg) weekly by IV infusion for two 28-day cycles then every 14 days for four 28-day cycles and IV bendamustine (70 mg/m2 ) on Days 1 and 2 of each cycle for up to six 28-day cycles or bendamustine alone. Thirty-two patients were treated with otlertuzumab and bendamustine and 33 with bendamustine alone. Overall response rate according to the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia criteria was 69% in the otlertuzumab and bendamustine arm and 39% in the bendamustine alone arm (P = 0·025). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15·9 months in the otlertuzumab and bendamustine arm and 10·2 months in the bendamustine alone arm (P = 0·0192). There was a higher incidence of pyrexia (34% vs. 12%) and neutropenia (59% vs. 39%) with the combination but this did not result in a higher incidence of severe (grade 3/4) infections (13% vs. 27%). This combination significantly increased the response rate and prolonged the PFS over single agent bendamustine in patients with relapsed or refractory CLL.

Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes of ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide versus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in the COMPLEMENT 2 trial of patients with relapsed CLL.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is an incurable disease. Quality of life during treatment and periods of subsequent remission is therefore vital. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was compared in relapsed CLL during and after treatment with ofatumumab combined with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide versus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide alone. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 v3 and QLQ-CLL16 were used to assess HRQoL in this open-label, phase 3 study. Improvements in prespecified domains of patient-reported outcomes (Global Health Status [GHS]/HRQoL and B symptom scores) were recorded in both treatment arms after three cycles and were sustained after 18 months of follow-up. The two treatment arms were not significantly different at the nominal 0.05 level for GHS/HRQoL (p = .7278) or B symptoms (p = .5968). Small improvements in quality of life were maintained after therapy. The addition of ofatumumab was without any adverse impact on HRQoL (NCT00824265).

Ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results from the COMPLEMENT 2 trial.

In this multicenter, open-label, phase III study, patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) were randomized (1:1) to receive ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (OFA + FC) or FC alone; the primary endpoint being progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by an independent review committee (IRC). Between March 2009 and January 2012, 365 patients were randomized (OFA + FC: n = 183; FC: n = 182). Median IRC-assessed PFS was 28.9 months with OFA + FC versus 18.8 months with FC (hazard ratio = 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.88; p = .0032). Grade ≥3 adverse events (≤60 days after last dose) were reported in 134 (74%) OFA + FC-treated patients compared with 123 (69%) FC-treated patients. Of these, neutropenia was the most common (89 [49%] vs. 64 [36%]). OFA + FC improved PFS with manageable safety for patients with relapsed CLL compared with FC alone, thus providing an alternative treatment option for patients with relapsed CLL. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00824265).

Economic evaluation of obinutuzumab in combination with chlorambucil in first-line treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Spain.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of obinutuzumab in combination with chlorambucil (GClb) versus rituximab plus chlorambucil (RClb) in the treatment of adults with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and with comorbidities that make them unsuitable for full-dose fludarabine-based therapy, from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System. METHODS: A Markov model was developed with three mutually exclusive health states: progression-free survival (with or without treatment), progression, and death. Survival time for the two treatments was modeled based on the results of CLL11 clinical trial and external sources. Each health state was associated with a utility value and direct medical costs. The utilities were obtained from a utility elicitation study conducted in the UK. Costs and general background mortality data were obtained from published Spanish sources. Deterministic and probabilistic analyses were conducted, with a time frame of 20 years. The health outcomes were measured as life years (LYs) gained and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. Efficiency was measured as the cost per LY or per QALY gained of the most effective regimen. RESULTS: In the deterministic base case analysis, each patient treated with GClb resulted in 0.717 LYs gained and 0.673 QALYs gained versus RClb. The cost per LY and per QALY gained with GClb versus RClb was €23,314 and €24,838, respectively. The results proved stable in most of the univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, with a probabilistic cost per QALY gained of €24,734 (95% confidence interval: €21,860-28,367). CONCLUSION: Using GClb to treat patients with previously untreated CLL for whom full-dose fludarabine-based therapy is unsuitable allows significant gains in terms of LYs and QALYs versus treatment with RClb. Treatment with GClb versus RClb can be regarded as efficient when considered the willingness to pay thresholds commonly used in Spain.

Ibrutinib combined with bendamustine and rituximab compared with placebo, bendamustine, and rituximab for previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma (HELIOS): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Most patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma relapse after initial therapy. Bendamustine plus rituximab is often used in the relapsed or refractory setting. We assessed the efficacy and safety of adding ibrutinib, an oral covalent inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK), to bendamustine plus rituximab in patients with previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma. METHODS: The HELIOS trial was an international, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study in adult patients (≥18 years of age) who had active chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma with measurable lymph node disease (>1·5 cm) by CT scan, and had relapsed or refractory disease following one or more previous lines of systemic therapy consisting of at least two cycles of a chemotherapy-containing regimen, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1, and adequate bone marrow, liver, and kidney function. Patients with del(17p) were excluded because of known poor response to bendamustine plus rituximab. Patients who had received previous treatment with ibrutinib or other BTK inhibitors, refractory disease or relapse within 24 months with a previous bendamustine-containing regimen, or haemopoietic stem-cell transplant were also excluded. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by a web-based system to receive bendamustine plus rituximab given in cycles of 4 weeks' duration (bendamustine: 70 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 2-3 in cycle 1, and days 1-2 in cycles 2-6; rituximab: 375 mg/m(2) on day 1 of cycle 1, and 500 mg/m(2) on day 1 of cycles 2-6 for a maximum of six cycles) with either ibrutinib (420 mg daily orally) or placebo until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients were stratified according to whether they were refractory to purine analogues and by number of previous lines of therapy. The primary endpoint was independent review committee (IRC)-assessed progression-free survival. Crossover to ibrutinib was permitted for patients in the placebo group with IRC-confirmed disease progression. Analysis was by intention-to-treat and is continuing for further long-term follow-up. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01611090. FINDINGS: Between Sept 19, 2012, and Jan 21, 2014, 578 eligible patients were randomly assigned to ibrutinib or placebo in combination with bendamustine plus rituximab (289 in each group). The primary endpoint was met at the preplanned interim analysis (March 10, 2015). At a median follow-up of 17 months (IQR 13·7-20·7), progression-free survival was significantly improved in the ibrutinib group compared with the placebo group (not reached in the ibrutinib group (95% CI not evaluable) vs 13·3 months (11·3-13·9) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·203, 95% CI 0·150-0·276; p<0·0001). IRC-assessed progression-free survival at 18 months was 79% (95% CI 73-83) in the ibrutinib group and 24% (18-31) in the placebo group (HR 0·203, 95% CI 0·150-0·276; p<0·0001). The most frequent all-grade adverse events were neutropenia and nausea. 222 (77%) of 287 patients in the ibrutinib group and 212 (74%) of 287 patients in the placebo group reported grade 3-4 events; the most common grade 3-4 adverse events in both groups were neutropenia (154 [54%] in the ibrutinib group vs 145 [51%] in the placebo group) and thrombocytopenia (43 [15%] in each group). A safety profile similar to that previously reported with ibrutinib and bendamustine plus rituximab individually was noted. INTERPRETATION: In patients eligible for bendamustine plus rituximab, the addition of ibrutinib to this regimen results in significant improvements in outcome with no new safety signals identified from the combination and a manageable safety profile. FUNDING: Janssen Research & Development.