RESUMO
Inflammasome activation is associated with disease severity in patients who are infected with SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses, but the specific cell types involved in inflammasome activation, as well as the balance of inflammasome activation versus viral replication in COVID-19 exacerbation and the induction of patient death, are unknown. In this study, we assessed lung autopsies of 47 COVID-19 and 12 influenza fatal cases and examined the inflammatory profiles and inflammasome activation; additionally, we correlated these factors with clinical and histopathological patient conditions. We observed an overall stronger inflammasome activation in lethal cases of SARS-CoV-2 compared to influenza and found a different profile of inflammasome-activating cells during these diseases. In COVID-19 patients, inflammasome activation is mostly mediated by macrophages and endothelial cells, whereas in influenza, type I and type II pneumocytes contribute more significantly. An analysis of gene expression allowed for the classification of COVID-19 patients into two different clusters. Cluster 1 (n=16 patients) died with higher viral loads and exhibited a reduced inflammatory profile than Cluster 2 (n=31 patients). Illness time, mechanical ventilation time, pulmonary fibrosis, respiratory functions, histopathological status, thrombosis, and inflammasome activation significantly differed between the two clusters. Our data demonstrated two distinct profiles in lethal cases of COVID-19, thus indicating that the balance of viral replication and inflammasome-mediated pulmonary inflammation may lead to different clinical conditions, yet both lead to patient death. An understanding of this process is critical for decisions between immune-mediated or antiviral-mediated therapies for the treatment of critical cases of COVID-19.
RESUMO
BackgroundPatients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) present varying clinical complications. Different viral load and host response related to genetic and immune background are probably the reasons for these differences. We aimed to sought clinical and pathological correlation that justifies the different clinical outcomes among COVID-19 autopsies cases. MethodsMinimally invasive autopsy was performed on forty-seven confirmed COVID-19 patients from May-July, 2020. Electronic medical record of all patients was collected and a comprehensive histopathological evaluation was performed. Immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, special stain, western blotting and post-mortem real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction on fresh lung tissue were performed. ResultsWe show that 5/47 (10,6%) patients present a progressive decline in oxygenation index for acute respiratory distress syndrome (PaO2/FiO2 ratio), low compliance levels, interstitial fibrosis, high -SMA+ cells/protein expression, high collagens I/III deposition and NETs(P<0.05), named as fibrotic phenotype (N=5). Conversely, 10/47 (21,2%) patients demonstrated progressive increase in PaO2/FiO2 ratio, high pulmonary compliance levels, preserved elastic framework, increase thrombus formation and high platelets and D-dimer levels at admission (P<0.05), named as thrombotic phenotype. While 32/47 (68,1%) had a mixed phenotypes between both ones. ConclusionsWe believe that categorization of patients based on these two phenotypes can be used to develop prognostic tools and potential therapies since the PaO2/FiO2 ratio variation and D-dimer levels correlate with the underlying fibrotic or thrombotic pathologic process, respectively; which may indicate possible clinical outcome of the patient.