Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
An Acad Bras Cienc ; 92(3): e20181068, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33111815

RESUMO

A chromatographic method consisting of multi wavelength detection for identification of six phenolic acids, one stilbene and five flavonoids in grape and apple pomaces was proposed. Scavenging of DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl), ABTS (2,2'-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid), reactive oxygen species and reduction of Fe3+ to Fe2+ using in vitro and HPLC-UV-ABTS on-line methods are herein presented. A reversed phase C18 coupled with an absorption detector operating at 280, 300, 320 and 360 nm for the benzoic acid derivatives and flavanols; stilbenes; cinnamic acid derivatives and flavonols, were respecctively used. The solvents water, methanol and acetonitrile acidified with acetic acid were evaluated as mobile phase. The optimized chromatographic method presented recoveries ranged from 68 to 130% and from 66 to 130% for grape and apple pomaces respectively. The determination coefficients (R2) of the 12 compounds were > 0.98. The extracts showed high total phenolic content and exhibits strong capacities to scavenge free radicals and reactive oxygen species. The results obtained by HPLC-ABTS on-line method suggest that pomaces of grape and apple are rich in bioactive compounds and that catechin and epicatechin contribute in a significantly way to the antioxidant activity in both agroindustrial pomaces.


Assuntos
Antioxidantes , Extratos Vegetais , Flavonoides , Fenóis , Polifenóis
2.
An. acad. bras. ciênc ; 89(1): 45-55, Jan,-Mar. 2017. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-886629

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Propolis produced by selected bees Apis mellifera were collected from March to June of 2013 and in March of 2015 and analyzed in order to evaluate the influence of climate, colony of origin, and food supplementation of colonies on the content of total phenolic and flavonoid by chromatographic analysis and antioxidant activity by radical scavenging of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl hydrate (DPPH) and 2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) methods. The Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was carried out with propolis collected in 2013 and two clusters were formed. Propolis produced in the months of March and April showed a higher content of total phenolic compounds (TPC) and antioxidant capacity than those produced in May and June. The results of PCA obtained from samples collected in March of 2013 and 2015 showed two clusters, and propolis collected in 2015 were more bioactive and presented a higher content of TPC. The chromatographic analysis of extracts allowed the identification of phenolic acids p-coumaric, ferulic and caffeic with similar chemical profiles that could be closely related to the botanical origin of propolis. It can be concluded that the season and food supplementation of colonies influenced the chemical composition and the biological activity of samples analysed.


Assuntos
Animais , Própole/química , Estações do Ano , Abelhas/fisiologia , Suplementos Nutricionais , Hidroxibenzoatos/análise , Antioxidantes/análise , Valores de Referência , Temperatura , Flavonoides/análise , Ácidos Cafeicos/análise , Análise Multivariada , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão , Ácidos Cumáricos/análise , Análise de Componente Principal , Indicadores e Reagentes
3.
An Acad Bras Cienc ; 89(1): 45-55, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28177054

RESUMO

Propolis produced by selected bees Apis mellifera were collected from March to June of 2013 and in March of 2015 and analyzed in order to evaluate the influence of climate, colony of origin, and food supplementation of colonies on the content of total phenolic and flavonoid by chromatographic analysis and antioxidant activity by radical scavenging of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl hydrate (DPPH) and 2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) methods. The Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was carried out with propolis collected in 2013 and two clusters were formed. Propolis produced in the months of March and April showed a higher content of total phenolic compounds (TPC) and antioxidant capacity than those produced in May and June. The results of PCA obtained from samples collected in March of 2013 and 2015 showed two clusters, and propolis collected in 2015 were more bioactive and presented a higher content of TPC. The chromatographic analysis of extracts allowed the identification of phenolic acids p-coumaric, ferulic and caffeic with similar chemical profiles that could be closely related to the botanical origin of propolis. It can be concluded that the season and food supplementation of colonies influenced the chemical composition and the biological activity of samples analysed.


Assuntos
Antioxidantes/análise , Abelhas/fisiologia , Suplementos Nutricionais , Hidroxibenzoatos/análise , Própole/química , Estações do Ano , Animais , Ácidos Cafeicos/análise , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão , Ácidos Cumáricos/análise , Flavonoides/análise , Indicadores e Reagentes , Análise Multivariada , Análise de Componente Principal , Valores de Referência , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Temperatura
4.
Food Chem ; 192: 306-12, 2016 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26304352

RESUMO

Purification and bioassay-guided fractionation were employed to isolate proanthocyanidins with antioxidant activity from peanut skin (Arachis hypogaea Runner 886). The crude extract was prepared with acetone (60% v/v) and purified using chromatographic methods, including a semipreparative HPLC technique. As a result, two proanthocyanidins were isolated and identified using NMR, epicatechin-(2 ß â†’ O → 7, 4 ß â†’ 8)-catechin (proanthocyanidin A1) and epicatechin-(ß â†’ 2 O → 7, 4 ß â†’ 8)-epicatechin (proanthocyanidin A2). Despite the structural similarity, differences were observed in their antioxidant activity. Proanthocyanidin A1 proved to be more active, with EC50 value for DPPH radical scavenging of 18.25 µg/mL and reduction of Fe(3+)-TPTZ complex of 7.59 mmol/g, higher than that of synthetic antioxidant BHT. This compound evaluated by ABTS(+) was similar to that of natural quercetin. Therefore, peanut skin is an important source of bioactive compounds that may be used as a mild antioxidant for food preservation.


Assuntos
Antioxidantes/análise , Arachis/química , Análise de Alimentos/métodos , Proantocianidinas/análise , Sementes/química , Bioensaio , Catequina/análise , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão , Extratos Vegetais/química , Quercetina/análise
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...