RESUMO
Antecedentes y objetivo: Determinar la confiabilidad interevaluador en la medición ultrasonográfica (US) de la excursión diafragmática (ED) y la fracción de engrosamiento diafragmático (FED) realizada por profesionales de salud no médicos en voluntarios sanos. Participantes y métodos: Estudio observacional prospectivo en un hospital de tercer nivel en Cali, Colombia. Se realizaron mediciones a 30 voluntarios sanos escogidos mediante muestreo a conveniencia, sin antecedentes de enfermedades pulmonares, con edades entre los 18-60 años. Previamente se realizó una prueba piloto con 8 voluntarios sanos. Las mediciones US de ED y FED se basaron en protocolos publicados anteriormente. Cada evaluador observaba independientemente varios ciclos de respiración tranquila normal durante 3minutos para establecer una línea de base. Para evaluar la confiabilidad interevaluador en las mediciones de ED y FED se utilizó el índice de correlación intraclase (ICC), con intervalos de confianza del 95% y un p<0,05. Resultados: Se identificó concordancia sustancial en la medición de la ED en las ventanas esplénica y hepática debido a que el ICC fue mayor a 0,6 (p<0,05). La medición de la FED en la ventana hepática mostró concordancia leve tanto en el modo 2D como en el modo M (p>0,05). En la ventana esplénica la medición de la FED en el modo 2D se identificó concordancia regular y para el modo M se encontró una concordancia leve (p>0,05). Conclusiones: La US diafragmática constituye un método reproducible con aceptable confiabilidad interevaluador para la medición del grosor inspiratorio/espiratorio y con confiabilidad pobre para la medición de FED.(AU)
Background and objective: To determine the inter-rater reliability in the ultrasonographic (US) measurement of the diaphragmatic excursion (DE) and the diaphragm thickness fraction (DTF) performed by non-medical health professionals in healthy people. Participants and methods: Prospective observational study in a third level hospital in Cali, Colombia. Measurements were made to 30 healthy volunteers chosen by convenience sampling, without a history of lung diseases, with ages between 18-60 years. A pilot test was previously carried out with 8 healthy volunteers. US measurements of DE, and DTF were based on previously published protocols. Each assessor independently observed several cycles of normal quiet breathing for 3minutes to establish a baseline. The Intraclass Correlation Index (ICC) was used to evaluate the inter-rater reliability in the measurements of DE and DTF, with 95% confidence intervals and a P<.05. Results: Substantial agreement was identified in the measurement of DE in the splenic and hepatic windows because the ICC was greater than 0.6 (P<.05). The measurement of the DTF in the hepatic window showed slight agreement in both 2D and M modes (P>.05). In the splenic window, the measurement of the DTF in the 2D mode was found to be moderate agreement and for the M mode a slight agreement was found (P>.05).Conclusions: The diaphragmatic US constitutes a reproducible method with acceptable inter-rater reliability for the measurement of inspiratory/expiratory thickness, and with little reliability for the measurement of DTF.(AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Voluntários Saudáveis , Diafragma , Ultrassonografia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Diafragma/anormalidades , Estudos Prospectivos , ColômbiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To determine the inter-rater reliability in the ultrasonographic (US) measurement of the diaphragmatic excursion (DE) and the diaphragm thickness fraction (DTF) performed by non-medical health professionals in healthy people. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Prospective observational study in a third level hospital in Cali, Colombia. Measurements were made to 30 healthy volunteers chosen by convenience sampling, without a history of lung diseases, with ages between 18-60 years. A pilot test was previously carried out with 8 healthy volunteers. US measurements of DE, and DTF were based on previously published protocols. Each assessor independently observed several cycles of normal quiet breathing for 3min to establish a baseline. The Intraclass Correlation Index (ICC) was used to evaluate the inter-rater reliability in the measurements of DE and DTF, with 95% confidence intervals and a p<0.05. RESULTS: Substantial agreement was identified in the measurement of DE in the splenic and hepatic windows because the ICC was greater than 0.6 (p<0.05). The measurement of the DTF in the hepatic window showed slight agreement in both 2D and M modes (p>0.05). In the splenic window, the measurement of the DTF in the 2D mode was found to be moderate agreement and for the M mode a slight agreement was found (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The diaphragmatic US constitutes a reproducible method with acceptable inter-rater reliability for the measurement of inspiratory/expiratory thickness, and with little reliability for the measurement of DTF.
