Traceability of environmental chemical analyses: can theory match practice?

According to the ISO definition, the traceability concept basically implies that measurement data are linked to stated references through an unbroken chain of comparisons, all with stated uncertainties. This concept may be quite clear in theory, but we may wonder how it may be applicable to complex chemical measurements such as environmental chemical analyses in practice. This paper discusses this issue, giving some examples of drawbacks that are being faced in different environmental sectors (water, sediment, soil, biota and particulate atmospheric samples).

Accuracy and traceability concepts applied to environmental speciation analysis.

Traceability issues are of increasing concern in all fields where chemical measurements form the basis for decisions. The concepts of accuracy and traceability as applied to environmental analysis are, however, still prone to misunderstandings, which has been recently illustrated by controversial discussions among the analytical community with respect to accuracy and traceability issues in the area of speciation analysis. Analytical techniques used for the determination of chemical species (speciation analysis) are generally based on a succession of steps (e.g. extraction derivatisation, separation, detection) which are all prone to various sources of systematic errors. Many speciation measurement techniques have been studied within the last decade through interlaboratory studies and certification of reference materials. These collaborative efforts have been understood as being directed towards strive for accuracy (trueness and precision). It has been recognised recently that the achievements actually enabled mostly to establish reference points (e.g. certified values in reference materials) which does not necessarily correspond to 'true values' but rather offer a mean for laboratories to compare their data internationally and, hence, achieve traceability. This ambiguity still generates confusion and misunderstandings among the scientific community. This communication discusses this issue, focusing on analytical measurements only. Extending discussions on general traceability issues would imply an examination of steps prior to laboratory work (sampling, storage, etc.) which is beyond the scope of this contribution.

Collaborative study to improve the quality control of trace element determinations in polymers. Part 2. Certification of polyethylene reference materials (CRMs 680 and 681) for As, Br, Cd, Cl, Cr, Hg, Pb, and S content.

Two polymer (polyethylene) reference materials have been produced in support of EC Directive 94/62/EC on plastic packaging and packaging material. The paper describes the preparation of the materials, the analytical work performed to characterize their homogeneity and stability, and the certification of the materials for a range of elements. The technical and statistical evaluation of the results are also summarized.

Trends in certified reference materials for the speciation of trace elements.

The measurement of the chemical species of elements (instead of the total element concentration) has become an irreversible trend in analytical chemistry. The motivation lies in the fact that the biochemical and geochemical behaviour of an element is governed by its species. Quality assurance of the analytical procedures used for speciation analysis requires the analysis of representative reference materials, certified for the relevant species. Up to now the number of existing certified reference materials for trace element species is very limited. The most important ones are environmental CRMs certified for trialkyltin compounds, methylmercury, Cr(III)/Cr(VI) and food CRMs certified for arsenic species and methylmercury. Major developments are to be expected in CRMs focussed on environmental problems, including waste treatment, on bioavailability of trace elements in food and on bio-monitoring in occupational health and hygiene. It is, however, unlikely that the producers of CRMs will ever be able to cover all needs. Add to this that many, very active species are notoriously unstable and/or short living and require in-situ analysis. This will lead to different analytical developments, such as analyses in-situ, where the classical concept of CRMs may not stand firm anymore.

Harmonized protocol and certified reference material for the determination of extractable contents of phosphorus in freshwater sediments--a synthesis of recent works.

An analytical protocol for the determination of the extractable phosphorus contents in freshwater sediments has been harmonized through interlaboratory studies in the frame of the Standards Measurements and Testing Program of the European Commission. A homogeneous and stable sediment reference material has been prepared and certified on the basis of this protocol named SMT protocol, and will be available in spring of 2001. The SMT protocol, together with the reference material, are useful tools in the field of water management, especially at a time when quality assurance and data comparability are of paramount importance in laboratory analysis. The knowledge of the bioavailable forms of phosphorus is important not only for sediments but also for sludge and soils. Therefore, the SMT protocol could be extended to these materials and new CRMs could be prepared. The SMT protocol was used in a study of a reservoir, which allowed to calculate the P stock, therefore helping to predict the restoration delay of the lake. The paper describes the protocol and the CRM, and gives a brief outline of the case study.

Critical outlook and trends for environmental reference materials at the Measurements & Testing Generic Activity (European Commission).

It is now well recognised that the quality control (QC) of all types of analyses, including environmental analyses depends on the appropriate use of reference materials. One of the ways to check the accuracy of methods is based on the use of Certified Reference Materials (CRMs), whereas other types of (not certified) Reference Materials (RMs) are used for routine quality control (establishment of control charts) and interlaboratory testing (e.g. proficiency testing). The perception of these materials, in particular with respect to their production and use, differs widely according to various perspectives (e.g. RM producers, routine laboratories, researchers). This review discusses some critical aspects of RM use and production for the QC of environmental analyses and describes the new approach followed by the Measurements & Testing Generic Activity (European Commission) to tackle new research and production needs.

Certification of the extractable contents of Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn in a freshwater sediment following a collaboratively tested and optimised three-step sequential extraction procedure.

Sequential extraction procedures have been used during the last decades to study and determine trace element mobility in aquatic sediments. However, the results obtained are operationally defined and, therefore, the significance of the analytical results is related to the extraction scheme used. So, there is a need for suitable reference materials for this type of study to enable the validation of the methodologies and to control the quality of the measurements. This paper describes the preparation of a sediment reference material, BCR-701, the homogeneity and stability studies and the analytical work performed for the certification of the extractable contents of some trace elements, following a collaboratively tested and optimised sequential (three-step) extraction procedure. The paper contains all the results and gives the methods used to certify the extractable contents (mass fractions expressed as mg kg-1 on a dry matter basis) of Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn in all steps. Moreover, indicative values are given for the aqua regia extractable contents of the six elements in the sediment and the residue obtained after sequential extraction.

A new organic-rich soil reference material certified for its EDTA- and acetic acid- extractable contents of Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn, following collaboratively tested and harmonised procedures.

There is an increasing requirement for assessment of the bioavailable metal fraction and the mobility of trace elements in soils upon disposal. One of the approaches is the use of leaching procedures, but the results obtained are operationally defined; therefore, their significance is highly dependent on the extraction protocol performed. So, for this type of study, there is a need for reference materials that allow the quality of measurements to be controlled. This paper describes the steps involved in the certification of an organic-rich soil reference material, BCR-700, for the EDTA- and acetic acid-extractable contents of some trace elements, following collaboratively tested and harmonised extraction procedures. Details are given for the preparation of the soil, homogeneity and stability testing, analytical procedures and the statistical selection of data to be included in the certification.

Development of a harmonised phosphorus extraction procedure and certification of a sediment reference material.

A harmonised procedure for the determination of the forms of phosphorus in freshwater sediments, developed in the frame of the European Programme, Standards, Measurements and Testing (SMT) has been used for a certification campaign for a reference material. This operationally defined scheme is a good compromise between method performance and reproducibility. Furthermore, the method is rather simple to implement and could be used by water managers on a routine basis. A homogeneous and stable sediment reference material has been prepared and will be available before mid 2001. The so-called SMT protocol, together with the reference material, are useful tools in the field of water management, especially at a time when quality assurance is of paramount importance in laboratory analyses. Knowledge of the bioavailable forms of phosphorus is important not only for analysis of sediments but also for sludge and soils. Therefore, the SMT protocol could be extended to these materials.

Harmonisation and quality assurance in pre-analytical steps of soil contamination studies--conclusions and recommendations of the CEEM Soil project.

The paper summarises the project's results and consequences including expert's statements. Based on sampling strategies and methodological details which have been recognised to be critical for the comparability of the results of soil contamination studies, recommendations are given towards harmonisation of soil sampling guidelines, improvement of quality assurance of pre-analytical steps and inclusion of soil sampling into accreditation systems. Recommended approaches to improve QA and QC in soil sampling are: harmonised guidelines; specified SOPs; written sampling (strategy) plans; defined qualification and experience of sampling personnel; sampling records; regular interlaboratory comparisons (proficency tests) for sampling; and inclusion of sampling and sample preparation into accreditation procedures. Needs for further research in the field of pre-analytical phases of soil contamination studies are outlined and further R&D projects are encouraged.

Analytical aspects of the CEEM soil project.

In the past, exercises aiming at an assessment of data uncertainty in environmental analysis were usually restricted to the analysis step, while sampling and pre-analytical sample treatment was largely ignored. Collaborative studies on the quantification of sampling errors require, besides a suitable and well characterized test site, the availability of a reference laboratory for the analysis of all of the samples taken in the context of the study by all participants and also test methods which do not contribute large and variable uncertainties due to long and complex analytical methodologies. Here we summarize the major analytical aspects of a European project on the identification and quantification of sampling influences on the determination of lead, cadmium, copper and zinc in soil. The participant group included the leading soil analysis laboratories in Europe; the test site at Dornach (CH) was well suited for the purpose and showed high metal gradients and differentiated land use. The analytical methods (wavelength-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry and solid-state Zeeman AAS) used in the study showed stable performance characteristics within the confidence interval of the certified reference materials used for the measurement quality control over the entire project period. Additionally, double-blind tests on split samples showed agreement of data in very narrow limits thus demonstrating the reliability of the reference database.

Objectives, concept and design of the CEEM soil project.

Within the member countries of the European Union, different strategies and guidelines for the sampling and the preparation of soils are used to investigate soil contamination. As a consequence, there is reasonable doubt that the results gained by applying these different strategies and methods are comparable. In general, the relative contribution of sampling and sample preparation to the total uncertainty in soil contamination studies is a subject of speculation than of knowledge. For this purpose, the first European soil sampling inter-comparison test was organised as a project under the Standards, Measurement and Testing Programme of the European Commission. The aim of this project was to analyse and to compare the existing guidelines, the degree and the state of standardisation in this field in the European countries, and to compare their results when applied on the same test area under comparable conditions by representative sampling teams. The results of the project in general demonstrate that sampling and sample preparation errors reach about the same order of magnitude as errors caused in the chemical analysis. However, there are great differences depending on the elements investigated and their concentration ranges, as well as on pedological and land-use conditions in the test area. Consequently, sampling and sample preparation require the same attentiveness and equivalent measures for quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) as the chemical analysis, which has not been the case up to now. Insufficient comparability of the results is illustrated by the fact that different participants arrive at different conclusions for up to 61% of tested soil quality criteria (e.g. threshold levels). The methods and results of the project are presented in detail in the six following papers within this volume. The following 13 papers present some key studies and specific contributions of the participants, as well as synoptical papers of the invited experts in standardisation and accreditation.

European soil sampling guidelines for soil pollution studies.

The soil sampling guidelines used in European countries (ESSG), as kindly provided by the national institutions which participated in the project, have been recorded, studied, evaluated and presented in this paper. The aim has been to ascertain what soil sampling guidelines exist in Europe; to detect similarities and differences (comparable results), advantages and deficiencies; to identify incompatible strategies and evaluate how methodologies might affect data quality; to investigate sources of deviations or uncertainties; to improve comparability and representativeness of soil sampling; to investigate the need for harmonised sampling guidelines; and to develop suggestions for standard operating procedures (SOP). Soil sampling guidelines throughout Europe differ as to whether they are applied by law, or used throughout the country. In some countries these are ISO/DIS related or based (ISO 10381-1, 1995; ISO 10381-2, 1995), or are produced by a scientific society or a standardisation body. As far as sampling strategy is concerned, not all sampling guidelines clearly describe the sampling scale, the specifications for contamination risk precautions, the sampling plan and protocol structure and the pre-analysis treatment of the soil samples. The purpose for sampling, in descending order of frequency, is soil pollution, soil fertilisation, general soil monitoring, background risk assessment, or else it is not specified. The majority of countries do not sample the top organic matter separately. Sampling depth is either related to the morphogenetic horizon or to ad hoc sampling depth, which is not specified in all cases. They suggest mass- and volume-related soil sampling, while the sampling pattern is not presented in all national guidelines. The criteria for area, site, unit, sub-unit, and point selection are mainly based on pedology and land use, following the history and pre-screening information or geology, or is site related. Some guidelines suggest the division of sampling units into sub-units. The sampling pattern is mainly grid sampling, grid and random sampling, or not mentioned. Sampling density inside the sampling unit either varies greatly or it is not mentioned, while the size of the sampling unit varies widely. Most guidelines require the collection of composite instead of simple samples, while some prefer sampling soil profiles. In the European SSG many technical details and steps are either not defined or vary, while in the pre-analysis treatment quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) approaches are used either both in the lab and in the field, or only in the field, or are not mentioned. The common points and the points in which harmonisation could be started or achieved are discussed.

Comparative soil sampling in the Dornach site (Switzerland) for soil three-dimensional pollution description.

Fifteen institutions from 13 European countries and Switzerland participated in a comparative test sampling at the Dornach site, near Basel in Switzerland. They received the site description and were asked to develop their own sampling plans, based on their national guidelines for a three-dimensional description of the Pb, Zn, Cu and Cd pollution, with a maximum of 15 samples. The comparative sampling test took place in late August 1997. The sampling plans and records, provided by the participants, were compared and evaluated in terms of sampling strategy throughout the site, the sampling strategy inside the sampling unit, strategy at the sampling point and last minute alteration of the sampling plans in the field. The object of this was to define the similarities and the differences in the sampling plans and identify the crucial steps inducing error or uncertainty which should be harmonized throughout Europe. The number of the total composite samples varied from 4 to 16, while the number of sampling points varied from 4 to 224 and the sampling density varied from 0.25 to 16 single samples per 100 m2. The number of 10 x 10 m2 quadrats from which samples were taken varied from 3 to 56, out of the total 61. The number of sampling units varied between 3 and 12. The criteria in descending order of frequency were: both land use and pedology, land use, pedology. The majority of the national participants divided the sampling units into two or three sub-units, while seven participants collected replicate composite samples from the same sampling unit. Only one sampled from the existing profiles, eight national representatives ignored the plough depth. The sampling pattern inside the sampling unit was in descending order of frequency: random, point sampling, regular, 'W' and 'X' shaped sampling. The number of single samples in the composite varied from 1 to 20. Most of the national participants sampled to pre-defined (ad-hoc) sampling depths, while others sampled soil horizons and others both. The maximum soil depth sampled also varied from 20 to 117 cm. Most participants mixed in the top organic matter horizon while others sampled it separately. Most sampled separately the top Ah horizon in the forest while the rest mixed it with the underlying soil horizon. The last-minute sampling plan alterations were in: the sampling depth (nine), the movement of sampling points (five), the reduction of sub-samples in the composite sample (four), changes in the number of sampling units (three), ignoring the bottom sample (three), not sampling the L/H layer (three) although this was planned, unplanned sampling of the L/H layer (two) and changing the number of planned samples (two). This study has highlighted the need for soil sampling harmonization throughout Europe for pollution and soil quality determination.

Quantitative evaluation of the CEEM soil sampling intercomparison.

The aim of the CEEM soil project was to compare and to test the soil sampling and sample preparation guidelines used in the member states of the European Union and Switzerland for investigations of background and large-scale contamination of soils, soil monitoring and environmental risk assessments. The results of the comparative evaluation of the sampling guidelines demonstrated that, in soil contamination studies carried out with different sampling strategies and methods, comparable results can hardly be expected. Therefore, a reference database (RDB) was established by the organisers, which acted as a basis for the quantitative comparison of the participants' results. The detected deviations were related to the methodological details of the individual strategies. The comparative evaluation concept consisted of three steps: The first step was a comparison of the participants' samples (which were both centrally and individually analysed) between each other, as well as with the reference data base (RDB) and some given soil quality standards on the level of concentrations present. The comparison was made using the example of the metals cadmium, copper, lead and zinc. As a second step, the absolute and relative deviations between the reference database and the participants' results (both centrally analysed under repeatability conditions) were calculated. The comparability of the samples with the RDB was categorised on four levels. Methods of exploratory statistical analysis were applied to estimate the differential method bias among the participants. The levels of error caused by sampling and sample preparation were compared with those caused by the analytical procedures. As a third step, the methodological profiles of the participants were compiled to concisely describe the different procedures used. They were related to the results to find out the main factors leading to their incomparability. The outcome of this evaluation process was a list of strategies and methods, which are problematic with respect to comparability, and should be standardised and/or specified in order to arrive at representative and comparable results in soil contamination studies throughout Europe. Pre-normative recommendations for harmonising European soil sampling guidelines and standard operating procedures have been outlined in Wagner G, Desules A, Muntau H, Theocharopoulos S. Comparative Evaluation of European Methods for Sampling and Sample Preparation of Soils for Inorganic Analysis (CEEM Soil). Final Report of the Contract SMT4-CT96-2085, Sci Total Environ 2001;264:181-186. Wagner G, Desaules A, Munatu H. Theocharopolous S, Quevauvaller Ph. Suggestions for harmonising sampling and sample pre-treatment procedures and improving quality assurance in pre-analytical steps of soil contamination studies. Paper 1.7 Sci Total Environ 2001b;264:103-118.

Production and use of BCR reference materials for quality assurance in environmental analysis: an update.

Reference materials represent an invaluable tool for analytical quality control. Certified Reference Materials (CRMs) are used for the validation of methods, whereas various types of (uncertified) Reference Materials (RMs) are used for routine quality control (establishment of control charts) and interlaboratory testing (e.g., proficiency testing). This paper provides background information on the production and use of environmental RMs and describes recent CRMs produced by the BCR (European Commission) for quality assurance in environmental analysis.

The capillary cold trap as a suitable instrument for mercury speciation by volatilization, cryogenic trapping, and gas chromatography coupled with atomic absorption spectrometry.

An innovative accessory for speciation analysis has been developed. The system is based on the combination of cryogenic trapping and gas chromatographic separation, carried out within the same capillary. The instrument, hyphenating derivatization, gas-phase extraction, preconcentration, and analyte separation, is semiautomated, and all operational parameters are adjustable via an in-house-developed control unit, which regulates the selected parameters throughout the analysis process. Species detection was carried out by atomic absorption spectrometry. The detection limits achieved were 33, 39, and 71 ng L(-1) for dimethylmercury, methylmercury, and inorganic mercury, respectively. A complete chromatogram could be obtained within three minutes, resulting in the duration of one whole analysis cycle of about 15 min. The proposed method was applied to mercury speciation in freeze-dried tuna fish powder after microwave-assisted extraction, finding that mercury is present at 80% as methylmercury and about 20% as inorganic mercury, in this kind of biological material.

Interlaboratory trial to determine the analytical state-of-the-art of bromate determination in drinking water.

The new European Directive for water intended for human consumption has established a regulatory level for bromate at 10 microg L(-1). This Maximum Admissible Concentration requires analytical methods with detection limits of a least 2.5 microg L(-1). A project funded by the Standards, Measurements and Testing Programme of the European Commission has enabled the improvement and/or development of methods for the determination of bromate at such concentration levels. This collaborative work was concluded by the organisation of an interlaboratory trial involving 26 European laboratories, which enabled the testing of both a draft ISO Standard method and alternative methods. This paper presents the results of this interlaboratory trial, along with results of a bromate stability study. The progress made with respect to the analytical state-of-the-art for bromate will greatly benefit the quality of measurements carried out in water quality monitoring.

Collaborative evaluation of the analytical state-of-the-art of platinum, palladium and rhodium determinations in road dust.

In order to control the quality of platinum, palladium and rhodium determinations in road dust, the Standards, Measurements and Testing Programme (formerly BCR) of the European Commission has started a project, the final aim of which is to certify a road dust reference material for its contents of platinum group elements. The first part of this project consisted of an interlaboratory study, which aimed to test the feasibility of the preparation of a candidate road dust reference material and to detect and remove most of the pitfalls observed in platinum, palladium and rhodium determinations. This paper presents the main results of this interlaboratory study carried out prior to the certification campaign. The concordance of the data obtained by the participating laboratories for the three elements was considered to reflect the state-of-the-art and was encouraging enough to decide on the organization of a certification campaign to be conducted during the year 2000. The progress made with respect to the analytical state-of-the-art for these elements will be of great benefit to the quality of measurements carried out in environmental monitoring in this particular field.