Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 75
Filtrar
1.
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech ; 9(4): 101339, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37965112

RESUMO

We describe a case of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and angulated proximal neck treated with a Gore Excluder conformable endoprosthesis and show relevant technical pitfalls in the deployment of the graft main body. An 82-year-old man presented with a 71-mm asymptomatic AAA with an angulated infrarenal proximal neck (75°) and was referred to our unit. The patient was treated with a 26-mm Gore Excluder conformable device, which was deployed slightly above the renal arteries after precatheterization of the lowest renal artery. The graft was then repositioned with support of the introducer sheath and a stiff guide wire. The proximal sealing zone was ballooned before the endograft delivery system was retrieved to avoid distal migration. Technical success was achieved. The patient was discharged with no complications. No type Ia endoleak was present on the 6-month computed tomography scan. Endovascular treatment of an AAA with a severe angulated proximal neck can be effective with a conformable stent graft if technical measures are used during deployment of the main body to optimize the seal.

2.
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech ; 9(3): 101181, 2023 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37799833

RESUMO

A 72-year-old man receiving anticoagulation therapy for chronic bilateral deep vein thromboses presented with acute right leg swelling. Right-sided imaging showed deep femoral vein thrombosis, chronic partial femoral vein thrombosis, and 4.8-cm distal external iliac vein dilation with possible right iliac vein stenosis. Venography confirmed common iliac vein occlusion and an aneurysm, with a fistula to the right internal iliac artery found by angiography. Aneurysm obliteration was achieved via arterial embolization with coils and an Amplatzer plug (Abbott, Chicago, IL). The patient continued with anticoagulation therapy, with patent common and external iliac arteries and a stable right external iliac vein aneurysm without arterial waveforms found on follow-up. His clinical manifestations were improved.

3.
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech ; 9(3): 101228, 2023 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37662569

RESUMO

Background: Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) with reverse-flow neuroprotection has emerged as an alternative to transfemoral carotid artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy. However, it requires fluoroscopic guidance, exposing the patient and surgeon to radiation. Although fusion-guided endovascular aneurysm repair has been demonstrated to significantly decrease this radiation risk, not much is known about similar outcomes for TCAR. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcomes at a single institution using fusion-guided imaging during TCAR compared with regional TCAR cases in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) registry without fusion imaging. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of data collected from all patients undergoing TCAR with fusion-guided imaging (TCAR-F) at our hospital and patients undergoing TCAR alone within the VQI database. The primary outcomes included the total operative time, dose area product, fluoroscopy time, contrast usage, and flow-reversal time. The demographics and preoperative risk factors were also assessed in both groups. Continuous outcomes were compared using the Welch t test. Categorical outcomes were compared using the Fisher exact test. Results: A total of 30 TCAR-F cases (January 2019 to May 2022) at our institution were compared against the regional VQI dataset (n = 2535). The TCAR-F cases had a lower dose area product (5.67 vs 93.1 Gy cm2; P < .0001), shorter fluoroscopy time (8.07 vs 16.4 minutes; P < .0001), and less contrast usage (13.49 vs 76.7 mL; P < .0001) compared with the regional averages of the same. The TCAR-F cases had a longer total operative time (117.3 vs 80.9 minutes; P < .0001) and flow-reversal time (14.4 vs 11.7 minutes; P = .025) compared with the regional cases. Conclusions: The results from this pilot study comparing TCAR-F patients at a single institution with VQI regional TCAR patients suggest that TCAR-F cases use less radiation and contrast compared with TCAR without fusion imaging. Fusion-guided imaging might provide radiation protection to both patients and surgeons and decrease contrast usage for the patient.

4.
J Vasc Surg ; 78(3): 841, 2023 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37599039
5.
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech ; 9(2): 101178, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37274433

RESUMO

A 61-year-old man presented with a 5.8-cm abdominal aortic aneurysm with bilateral pelvic kidneys incidentally discovered by computed tomography angiography. Given the complex anatomy, an open approach was favored over an endovascular approach to address the aneurysm and preserve renal function. Renal perfusion was achieved with a short clamp time of 29 minutes and intermittent boluses of cold renal perfusion solution delivered into each renal artery via a Fogarty infusion catheter. We describe a rare case of bilateral ectopic kidneys in the setting of open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair using the described technique.

6.
J Vasc Surg ; 77(5): 1317-1321, 2023 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37087144
7.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 88: 63-69, 2023 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35810945

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The use of warfarin for anticoagulation in thromboembolic disease has been the mainstay of treatment. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have demonstrated equivalent anticoagulant effects, without increased bleeding risks or need for frequent monitoring. However, the role of DOACs remains unclear in the setting of replacing warfarin for high-risk peripheral artery disease (PAD) interventions. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of DOACs compared to warfarin during the postoperative period in patients that underwent a lower extremity high-risk bypass (HRB). METHODS: The study is a single institution, retrospective review of all lower extremity HRBs between January 2012 and June 2021, who were previously placed on or started on anticoagulation with a DOAC or warfarin. The HRB group included all patients undergoing femoral to above or below knee bypass with an adjunct procedure, or below knee bypass with synthetic or composite vein conduit. All demographics, preoperative factors, and complications were evaluated with respect to DOAC versus warfarin. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients (28 males; average age 68.8 ± 10.9) underwent an HRB during the study period. There were no significant differences in demographics and preoperative characteristics between the 2 groups. Among patient comorbidities, coronary artery disease was found to be significantly higher in patients on DOACs (P = 0.03). The 12-month primary patency rate was 83.3% versus 57.1%, for DOAC versus warfarin respectively (P = 0.03). Multivariate analyses revealed that <30-day reinterventions contribute to 12-month patency (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent lower extremity HRB with postoperative DOAC appeared to exhibit higher graft patency rates than those who were placed on warfarin. Due to their low incidence of undesirable side effects and the lack of frequent monitoring, DOACs could be considered a safe alternative to warfarin in the postoperative period for patients with HRB.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , Varfarina , Masculino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Anticoagulantes , Administração Oral , Resultado do Tratamento , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico
8.
J Vasc Surg ; 77(2): 432-439.e1, 2023 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36130697

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Endovascular intervention has become the first-line treatment of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) or aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). However, open abdominal aortic repair remains a valuable treatment option for patients who are younger, those with unfavorable anatomy, and patients for whom endovascular intervention has failed. The cohort of patients undergoing open repair has become highly selected; nevertheless, updated outcomes or patient selection recommendations have been unavailable. In the present study, we explored and compared the characteristics and postoperative outcomes of patients who had undergone open abdominal aortic repair from 2009 to 2018. METHODS: Patients who had undergone open AAA (n = 9481) or AIOD (n = 9257) repair were collected from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. The primary outcome was the 30-day mortality. The secondary outcomes included 30-day return to the operating room, total operative time, total hospital stay, and postoperative complications. Unmatched and matched differences between the two groups and changes over time were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to assess the risk factors predicting for 30-day mortality. RESULTS: After propensity matching (n = 4980), those in the AIOD group had had a higher 30-day mortality rate (5.1% vs 4.1%; P = .021), a higher incidence of wound complications (7.4% vs 5.1%; P<.0001) and an increased 30-day return to the operating room (14.2% vs 9.1%; P < .0001). More open AIOD cases (P = .02) and fewer open AAA cases (P = .04) had been treated in the second half of the decade than in the first. The factors associated with an increased odds of 30-day mortality included advanced age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥III, functional dependence, blood transfusion <72 hours before surgery, weight loss in previous 6 months, and a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. CONCLUSIONS: From 2009 to 2018, the number of open AAA repairs decreased and the proportion of open abdominal AIOD cases increased. Open AIOD surgery was associated with higher 30-day mortality, increased return to the operating room, and increased wound complications vs open AAA repair. Multiple risk factors increased the odds for perioperative mortality. Thus, open abdominal aortic repair should be selectively applied to patients with fewer risk factors.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal , Implante de Prótese Vascular , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Humanos , Criança , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Fatores de Tempo , Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/complicações , Fatores de Risco , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos
9.
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech ; 8(4): 729-731, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36425250

RESUMO

A lower extremity venous aneurysm is an uncommon vascular disease known to increase a patient's risk of pulmonary embolism. Although most will be popliteal venous aneurysms, crural aneurysms have been rarely documented. We have presented a rare case of a soleal venous aneurysm in a patient with a history of pulmonary embolism. Risk-reducing open aneurysm resection with lateral venorrhaphy was performed.

11.
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech ; 8(3): 433-437, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35996731

RESUMO

A 61-year-old woman with May-Thurner anatomy status post recent hysterectomy was found to have two iliac vein aneurysms on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Transfemoral venography showed the venous aneurysms received retrograde flow from the left internal iliac vein and the left common iliac vein (CIV) was compressed by the right common iliac artery. Both aneurysms were coil embolized and a left CIV stent was placed. Our initial experience suggests that iliac vein aneurysms may be caused by CIV compression and an endovascular approach is safe and effective to treat both lesions.

12.
J Vasc Surg ; 76(4): 951-959.e2, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35688351

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To report the 1-year clinical outcomes from the GORE EXCLUDER Conformable AAA Endoprosthesis system in the US regulatory trial. METHODS: The study is a prospective, multicenter, investigational device exemption clinical trial at 31 US sites with core laboratory assessment of imaging and independent event adjudication. The primary safety (incidence of major adverse events at 30 days) and effectiveness end points (successful aneurysm treatment at 1 year) were assessed in a cohort of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). RESULTS: We enrolled 80 patients between December 19, 2017, and February, 27, 2019. The mean maximum aortic diameter was 57.7 ± 7.95 mm (range, 42.5-82.7 mm) with an average patient age of 73.5 ± 8.14 years (range, 56-96 years). Overall technical success was 100% (80/80). The mean hospital length stay was 1.2 ± 0.6 days (range, 1-4 days). No primary safety end point events were observed, including no death, stroke, myocardial infarction, bowel ischemia, paraplegia, respiratory failure, renal failure, procedural blood loss of more than 1000 mL, or thromboembolic events including limb occlusion or distal emboli. There were no type I or III endoleaks detected on the 1-, 6-, or 12-month follow-up computed tomography scans. There were no stent fractures, device migrations (≥10 mm), AAA ruptures, or conversions to open surgical repair observed. Two patients had AAA sac growth of more than 5 mm at 1 year owing to type II endoleaks. There were no aneurysm-related deaths within the 12-month follow-up, and freedom from aneurysm-related mortality was 100% through 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: The safety and effectiveness of the GORE EXCLUDER Conformable AAA Endoprosthesis system has been demonstrated with 98.5% freedom from primary effectiveness end point events at 1 year and 100% freedom from primary safety end point events assessed through 30 days.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal , Implante de Prótese Vascular , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/complicações , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Endoleak/etiologia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos Prospectivos , Desenho de Prótese , Stents/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
13.
J Vasc Surg ; 76(6): 1502-1510, 2022 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35709860

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has become the preferred treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Recent studies have demonstrated that cases of EVAR failure repair and subsequent open conversion have increased. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the national trend of annual cases and assess the 30-day outcomes of conversion to open repair after failed EVAR compared with primary open repair. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for relevant Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision, codes to identify patients who had undergone conversion to open repair or primary open repair of nonruptured AAAs from 2009 to 2018. The annual trend of cases was assessed, and the perioperative outcomes of both procedures were compared. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify independent perioperative factors associated with mortality. RESULTS: Of the 9635 patients with nonruptured AAAs included in the present analysis, 9250 had undergone primary repair and 385 had required open conversion. During the 10-year period, the annual number of cases of open conversion had steadily increased and that of primary repair had decreased. The incidence of postoperative complications was similar between both groups, except for cardiac arrest, which had occurred more frequently in the open conversion group. The 30-day mortality was higher in the open conversion group than in the primary group (9.6% vs 3.9%; P < .0001). Open conversion was also independently associated with higher odds of death (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-2.4; P < .0001). When the average mortality in both groups was compared between the first and last 5 years, no difference was found (open conversion: 9.8% vs 9.5% [P = 1.00]; primary repair: 3.6% vs 4.2% [P = .19]). Other perioperative factors independently associated with mortality included increased age (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.5-2.1; P < .0001), American Society of Anesthesiologists class ≥III (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.1-6.6; P = .029), insulin-dependent diabetes (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2-3.3; P = .005), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.8; P = .006), the presence of dyspnea at rest (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.8-6.1; P < .0001), and a high preoperative hematocrit (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.93-0.97; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Open conversion to treat nonruptured AAAs after failed EVAR was independently associated with higher mortality. Also, the annual cases of open conversion have continued to increase without any significant changes in postoperative mortality. This highlights the danger of open conversion and stresses the need for better solutions to prevent and manage EVAR failure.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal , Aneurisma Aórtico , Implante de Prótese Vascular , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Humanos , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/complicações , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Modelos Logísticos , Fatores de Tempo , Aneurisma Aórtico/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
14.
Innovations (Phila) ; 17(3): 231-236, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35549941

RESUMO

There is no consensus on the best treatment modality for acute distal embolization complications during endovascular interventions for peripheral arterial diseases. We report on 3 patients who underwent mechanical embolectomy using a distal embolic protection device (EPD). All patients showed angiographic evidence of distal embolism, which occurred during lower extremity limb salvage endovascular procedures. After embolectomy, all had complete recanalization of the involved vessel on completion angiogram, and none had any device-related complications or adverse outcomes from the embolization. This initial experience suggests that EPD can be used for both the prevention and treatment of intraoperative distal embolization during endovascular intervention of lower extremity arterial disease.


Assuntos
Dispositivos de Proteção Embólica , Embolia , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Doença Arterial Periférica , Embolia/etiologia , Embolia/prevenção & controle , Embolia/cirurgia , Humanos , Extremidade Inferior/irrigação sanguínea , Doença Arterial Periférica/cirurgia , Stents/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
15.
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech ; 8(2): 271-274, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35586679

RESUMO

An 87-year-old woman with grade IIIb follicular lymphoma treated with rituximab had presented with nausea, emesis, and chest pain of 1 day duration. She was found to have a contained abdominal aortic rupture secondary to follicular lymphoma invasion. She safely and successfully underwent emergent endovascular aortic repair. We have described a rare case of extranodal disease in follicular lymphoma associated with abdominal aortic pseudoaneurysms, likely due to a combination of malignancy-induced chronic inflammation and radiation therapy and chemotherapy side effects.

16.
J Vasc Access ; : 11297298211070703, 2022 Jan 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35001732

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Central venous obstruction (CVO) often arises among hemodialysis patients with upper extremity access due to a varying number of risk factors. While the true incidence of CVO in hemodialysis patients is unknown, it been reported in the range of 20%-40% in dialysis patients undergoing venograms. In the non-hemodialysis population, chronic central vein obstruction has a compensatory mechanism comprised of numerous collaterals along the chest wall, neck, and mediastinum. However, the presence of an AVF or AVG ipsilateral to a central venous stenosis or occlusion can overwhelm the collateral network due to the significantly elevated blood flow. This may result in severe and debilitating upper extremity and fascial swelling. While ligation results in almost instantaneous symptomatic relief, it does not address the patient's underlying pathologic process and necessitates an additional access. As these patients continue to live longer, our strategies to manage these failing accesses are becoming increasingly complex. The goal of preserving existing access while correcting any symptoms is paramount. Previous case reports have documented various surgical options for preserving an existing access. CASE PRESENTATION: Our patient is a 49-year-old female with hypertension and end-stage renal disease, on hemodialysis through a right arm arteriovenous (AV) fistula. She had a history of multiple AV fistulae creations in the past, all of which previously thrombosed. Several years after the creation of her most recent fistula, she developed severe throbbing headaches, right arm and facial swelling, right eye lacrimation, and blurry vision. AV fistula angiogram demonstrated right brachiocephalic vein chronic occlusion and endovascular revascularization through both trans-AVF and transfemoral approaches were attempted, but unsuccessful. DISCUSSION: This case illustrates the success of the creation of an internal jugular-jugular vein bypass to maintain a right arm arteriovenous fistula, while at the same time, correcting the symptoms of a right brachiocephalic vein occlusion.

17.
Innovations (Phila) ; 16(2): 192-194, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33480302

RESUMO

Surgical treatment of acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection does not address the entire aorta, which can leave anatomically complex residual aortic dissection in the aortic arch and descending aorta. Open repair has been the standard treatment for this pathology. When the lesions are located in the aortic arch, re-do total arch replacement needs to be performed. Plug placement to close small entry tears in the aortic arch has been reported. This article reports about a 79-year-old man who underwent hemiarch replacement for acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection. One year later, his proximal descending aorta dilated to 6.3 cm. The patient was treated with Amplatzer plug in the false lumen, and a stent graft was placed in the true lumen. Follow-up computed tomography scan confirmed complete thrombosis of the false lumen in the descending aorta which had decreased from 6.3 to 4.0 cm. Plug placement in the false lumen in the aortic arch is a potential treatment strategy for anatomically complex residual aortic dissection to induce thrombosis of the false lumen and encourage remodeling.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica , Dissecção Aórtica , Implante de Prótese Vascular , Idoso , Dissecção Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Dissecção Aórtica/cirurgia , Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagem , Aorta Torácica/cirurgia , Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/cirurgia , Prótese Vascular , Humanos , Masculino , Stents , Resultado do Tratamento
18.
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech ; 6(4): 524-527, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32904963

RESUMO

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease typically manifested as a respiratory infection with a range of symptoms from a mild viral illness to a severe acute respiratory syndrome with multiorgan failure and death. We report a case of a young man presenting with compartment syndrome secondary to COVID-19 viral myositis, with a protracted hospital course further complicated by extensive venous and arterial thrombosis. As the coronavirus pandemic evolves, our understanding of the virus continues to improve; however, a host of unanswered questions remain about atypical presentation and management and treatment options.

20.
J Card Surg ; 35(7): 1736-1739, 2020 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32497341

RESUMO

The impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in New York City (NYC) is dramatic. COVID-19 cases surged, hospitals expanded to meet capacity, and NYC remains the global epicenter of this pandemic. During this unprecedented time, a young woman with known Marfan syndrome presented with an acute complicated type B aortic dissection to our Aortic Center. Using the provisional extension to induce a complete attachment technique, we treated this patient and quickly discharged her the next day to decrease the risk of COVID-19 infection. Her progress was monitored using frequent phone calls and one office visit at two weeks.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/cirurgia , Dissecção Aórtica/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/métodos , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Dor Abdominal/diagnóstico , Dor Abdominal/etiologia , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Dissecção Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Dissecção Aórtica/etiologia , Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/etiologia , COVID-19 , Dor no Peito/diagnóstico , Dor no Peito/etiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Angiografia por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Síndrome de Marfan/complicações , Síndrome de Marfan/diagnóstico , Cidade de Nova Iorque , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...