Nonunion After First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: The Association With Shoe Size.

INTRODUCTION: First metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthrodesis is a common treatment for various foot conditions, with nonunion as a frequent complication. The incidence of nonunion varies widely in the literature. In particular, males have a higher risk of nonunion than females. This is possibly due to biomechanical and anatomical differences, as men have on average larger feet than women. This study therefore aims to explore whether shoe size, as a proxy for foot size, affects nonunion rates and could explain the gender disparity in nonunion rates. METHODOLOGY: An exploratory analysis of retrospectively collected data from patients who underwent primary first MTPJ arthrodesis in a single secondary hospital between January 2012 and December 2019. Additional data on body weight, height, and shoe size were prospectively collected from patients. RESULTS: Among 261 included patients, 57 (21.8%) experienced nonunion. Nonunion incidence was higher in males (18, 26.9%) than in females (39, 20.1%). Self-reported shoe size showed no significant association with nonunion in both univariate and multivariate analyses. DISCUSSION: The study's findings suggest that shoe size, as a proxy for foot size, is not associated with nonunion after the first MTPJ arthrodesis. Despite observing a gender difference in nonunion rates, this disparity could not be explained by shoe size. CONCLUSIONS: Shoe size as a proxy for foot size appears to have no clinical association with nonunion following the first MTPJ arthrodesis.

The outcomes of conversion of hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty, a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Acetabular erosion is an important complication in hemiarthroplasty and may lead to total hip arthroplasty as a conversion. The results of total hip arthroplasty as a conversion remain unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the outcome of total hip arthroplasty as a conversion with primary total hip arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PRISMA guidelines were used and Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane libraries were searched. Both, studies comparing the outcome of total hip arthroplasty as a conversion with the outcome of primary total hip arthroplasty and the outcome of cohort studies limited to total hip arthroplasty as a conversion, were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non Randomized Studies checklist. Meta-analysis was performed concerning pooled annual revision, dislocation and infection rates. RESULTS: A total of 27 studies were available for analysis; four comparative studies and 23 cohort studies. Comparative studies were defined as high quality and cohort studies as medium quality. Analysis revealed a significantly higher overall revision risk (Hazard Ratio 1.72, 95% confidence interval 1.39 to 2.14) after total hip arthroplasty as a conversion compared to primary total hip arthroplasty. The annual revision rate of total hip arthroplasty as a conversion was 1.63% (95% confidence interval 1.14 to 2.33) in the comparative studies and 1.40% (95% confidence interval 1.17 to 1.66) in the cohort studies. A pooled infection rate of 4.34% (95% confidence interval 2.66 to 7.01) and dislocation rate of 4.79% (95% confidence interval 3.02 to 7.53), was found. CONCLUSIONS: Literature concerning the results of total hip arthroplasty as a conversion is limited. The risk of revision after conversion of hemiarthroplasty is higher compared to primary total hip arthroplasty.

Optimal timing of hip and knee arthroplasty after bariatric surgery: A systematic review.

Background: Obesity is a risk factor for the development of osteoarthritis and contributes to the increasing demand for total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Because a lower preoperative weight decreases the risk of complications after TJA, and because bariatric surgery (BS) can reduce weight and comorbidity burden, orthopedic surgeons often recommend BS prior to TJA in patients with obesity. However, the optimal timing of TJA after BS in terms of complications, revisions and dislocations is unknown. Methods: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were systematically searched for any type of study reporting rates of complications, revisions and dislocations in patients who had TJA after BS. The included studies' quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: Out of the 16 studies eligible for review, eight registry-based retrospective studies of high to moderate quality compared different time periods between BS and TJA and overall their results suggest little differences in complication rates. The remaining eight retrospective studies evaluated only one time period and had moderate to poor quality. Overall, there were no clear differences in outcomes after TJA for the different time frames between BS and TJA. Conclusion: The results of this systematic review suggest that there is limited and insufficient high-quality evidence to determine the optimal timing of TJA after BS in terms of the rates of complications, revisions and dislocations. Given this lack of evidence, timing of TJA after BS will have to be decided by weighing the individual patients' risk factors against the expected benefits of TJA.

Eponymous terms in acromioclavicular joint surgery.

Eponymization serves as a means of paying tribute to individuals who have made significant contributions to our culture. Each eponym is often linked with a story for everyone to discover. To aid in the retention of these stories, this review offers readers an overview of the individuals behind the eponymous terms, as well as their original descriptions, within the context of acromioclavicular joint pathology and orthopaedic surgery.

Controversies around hip fracture treatment: clinical evidence versus trends from national registries.

PURPOSE: Several controversies in the optimal treatment of femoral neck fractures persist, together with large variations in clinical practice. METHODS: A narrative literature review covering 4 current controversies in the surgical management of femoral neck fractures (total hip arthroplasty (THA) versus hemiarthroplasty (HA), cemented versus uncemented HA, internal fixation versus arthroplasty, operative versus non-operative) was performed. Available literature was balanced against annual trends in the management of femoral neck fractures from the public domain of several national registries (Sweden, Norway, The Netherlands, Australia and New Zealand). RESULTS: For most controversies, the literature provides stronger evidence than is reflected by variations encountered in daily practice. Implementation of clinical evidence tends to lag behind and important differences exist between countries. CONCLUSIONS: Trends of clinical practice from national registries indicate that implementation of available clinical evidence needs to be improved.

No difference in bacterial contamination of hip capsule sutures and control sutures in hip arthroplasty surgery.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative preventive measures are important to further reduce the rate of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). During THA surgery, joint capsule sutures are commonly placed to optimize exposure and reinsertion of the capsule. Bacterial contamination of these sutures during the procedure poses a potential risk for postoperative infection. In this exploratory study, we assessed the contamination rate of capsule sutures compared to the contamination of the remains of exchanged control sutures at the time of closure. METHODS: In 100 consecutive patients undergoing primary THA capsule sutures were exchanged by sterile sutures at the time of capsule closure. Both the original sutures and the remainder of the newly placed (control) sutures were retrieved, collected and cultured for ten days. Types of bacterial growth and contamination rates of both sutures were assessed. RESULTS: Sutures from 98 patients were successfully collected and analyzed. Bacterial growth was observed in 7/98 (7.1%) of the capsule sutures versus 6/98 (6.1%) of the control sutures, with a difference of 1% [CI -6-8]. There was no clear pattern in differences in subtypes of bacteria between groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that around 7% of capsule sutures used in primary THA were contaminated with bacteria and as such exchange by new sutures at the time of capsule closure could be an appealing PJI preventive measure. However, since similar contamination rates were encountered with mainly non-virulent bacteria for both suture groups, the PJI preventive effect of this measure appears to be minimal.

Revision risk of salvage compared with acute total hip arthroplasty following femoral neck fracture: an analysis from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is no consensus on the treatment of patients with femoral neck fractures between internal fixation (IF) or directly treated with a total hip arthroplasty (fracture-THA) in particular for the age group 60-70 years. Failure of IF is not uncommon, resulting in salvage total hip arthroplasty (salvage-THA). The aim of our study was to compare revision rates of salvage-THA with fracture-THA and osteoarthritis (OA)-THA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Revision rates and reasons for revision were compared. Data collected in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI) between 2007 and 2018 was used. The study included 4,310 salvage-THAs, 12,159 fracture-THAs, and 274,147 OA-THAs. We performed Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and Cox regression to evaluate THA survival. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference in revision rates between salvage-THAs and fracture-THAs was found (HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.7-1.3) whereas the revision rate was higher compared with OA-THAs (HR 1.3, CI 1.0-1.5). The 5-year revision rate was 5.0% (CI 4.4-5.8) in salvage-THAs, 4.5% (CI 4.1-5.0) in fracture-THAs, and 3.1% (CI 3.0-3.2) in OA-THAs. A higher revision rate for infection was found in salvage-THAs in comparison with fracture-THAs (HR 1.6, CI 1.0-2.3). CONCLUSION: We found no difference in revision rates for salvage-THAs compared with fracture-THAs. The risk of revision for infection was higher for salvage-THA.

Wound drainage after arthroplasty and prediction of acute prosthetic joint infection: prospective data from a multicentre cohort study using a telemonitoring app.

Background: Differentiation between uncomplicated and complicated postoperative wound drainage after arthroplasty is crucial to prevent unnecessary reoperation. Prospective data about the duration and amount of postoperative wound drainage in patients with and without prosthetic joint infection (PJI) are currently absent. Methods: A multicentre cohort study was conducted to assess the duration and amount of wound drainage in patients after arthroplasty. During 30 postoperative days after arthroplasty, patients recorded their wound status in a previously developed wound care app and graded the amount of wound drainage on a 5-point scale. Data about PJI in the follow-up period were extracted from the patient files. Results: Of the 1019 included patients, 16 patients (1.6 %) developed a PJI. Minor wound drainage decreased from the first to the fourth postoperative week from 50 % to 3 %. Both moderate to severe wound drainage in the third week and newly developed wound drainage in the second week after a week without drainage were strongly associated with PJI (odds ratio (OR) 103.23, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 26.08 to 408.57, OR 80.71, 95 % CI 9.12 to 714.52, respectively). The positive predictive value (PPV) for PJI was 83 % for moderate to heavy wound drainage in the third week. Conclusion: Moderate to heavy wound drainage and persistent wound drainage were strongly associated with PJI. The PPV of wound drainage for PJI was high for moderate to heavy drainage in the third week but was low for drainage in the first week. Therefore, additional parameters are needed to guide the decision to reoperate on patients for suspected acute PJI.

Factors Associated With Nonunion in Arthrodesis of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint is the current treatment of choice for symptomatic advanced hallux rigidus and moderate-to-severe hallux valgus. There are different methods to perform arthrodesis, yet no consensus on the best approach. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the effects of preoperative and postoperative hallux valgus angle (HVA), joint preparation and fixation technique, and postoperative immobilization on the incidence of nonunion. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter cohort study was performed that included 794 patients. Univariate and multiple logistic regression was conducted to determine associations between joint preparation, fixation techniques, postoperative immobilization, weightbearing, and pre- and postoperative HVA with nonunion. RESULTS: Nonunion incidence was 15.2%, with 11.1% symptomatic and revised. Joint preparation using hand instruments (OR 3.75, CI 1.90-7.42) and convex/concave reamers (OR 2.80, CI 1.52-5.16) were associated with greater odds of a nonunion compared to planar cuts. Joint fixation with crossed screws was associated with greater odds of nonunion (OR 2.00, CI 1.11-3.42), as was greater preoperative HVA (OR 1.02, CI 1.00-1.03). However, the latter effect disappeared after inclusion of postoperative HVA in the model, with a small association identified between residual postoperative HVA and nonunion (OR 1.04, CI 1.01-1.08). Similarly, we found an association between odds of nonunion and higher body weight (OR 1.02, CI 1.01-1.04) but not of body mass index. CONCLUSION: Based on our results, first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis with planar cuts and fixation with a plate and interfragmentary screw is associated with the lowest odds of resulting in a nonunion. Higher body weight and greater preoperative HVA were associated with slight increase in rates of nonunion. It is crucial to properly correct the hallux valgus deformity during surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective case control study.

Non-union incidence of different joint preparation types, joint fixation techniques, and postoperative weightbearing protocols for arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint in moderate-to-severe hallux valgus: a systematic review.

Purpose: A systematic review to determine the effect of different types of joint preparation, joint fixation, and postoperative weight-bearing protocols on non-union frequency in first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthrodesis in patients with moderate-to-severe hallux valgus. Material and methods: A systematic literature search (PubMed and EMBASE), adhering to PRISMA guidelines. Data on MTPJ preparation, fixation, weight-bearing, and non-union in patients with moderate-to-severe hallux valgus were collected. Quality assessment was performed using the Coleman Methodology Score. Results: Sixteen studies (934 feet) were included, generally of medium quality. Overall non-union rate was 7.7%. At 6.3%, convex/concave joint preparation had the lowest non-union rate vs 12.2% for hand instruments and 22.2% for planar cuts. Non-union of 2.8% was found for joint fixation with a plate combined with a lag screw vs 6.5% for plate fixation, 11.1% for crossed screw fixation, and 12.5% for a plate with a cross plate compression screw. A 5.1% non-union frequency was found following postoperative full weight-bearing on a flat shoe vs 9.3% for full weight-bearing on a heel weight-bearing shoe and 0% for a partial weight-bearing regimen. Conclusion: Based on medium-quality papers, joint preparation with convex/concave reamers and joint fixation with a plate using a lag screw show the lowest non-union rate. Full postoperative weight-bearing in a stiff-soled postoperative shoe is safe and not associated with non-union vs a more protective load-bearing regimen. Further research should focus on larger sample sizes, longer follow-ups, and stronger study designs.

Empiric antibiotic therapy in early periprosthetic joint infection: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication following total knee or total hip arthroplasty (TKA/THA). Appropriate empiric antibiotic treatment, initiated directly after debridement and implant retention (DAIR), is suggested to contribute to treatment success. The aim of this study was to describe the microbiology and the antibiotic susceptibility in early PJI to guide future empiric treatment in a region with a low incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent DAIR within 3 months after primary unilateral TKA or THA between January 2011 and December 2018 were retrospectively identified from the hospital electronic health records. Data on causative pathogens, antimicrobial susceptibility and the number of post-operative days until cultures demonstrated bacterial growth were collected. RESULTS: One hundred and eleven early PJIs were identified of which 65 (59%) were monomicrobial and 46 (41%) polymicrobial. Among all isolated pathogens, Staphylococcus aureus (n = 53; 29%) was the most commonly identified pathogen in early PJI without any involvement of MRSA. 72% of PJIs were susceptible to vancomycin which could be increased to around 90% by adding gram-negative coverage. On the 5th postoperative day, bacterial growth was observed in 98% of cases. All gram-negative bacteria demonstrated positive tissue cultures on the 4th postoperative day. CONCLUSION: Vancomycin combined with ciprofloxacin or a third generation cephalosporin provided the highest antimicrobial coverage of all responsible pathogens identified in early PJI. Empiric treatment of gram-negative treatment can be safely terminated in the absence of gram-negative pathogens after 4 days of culturing in cases without preoperative antibiotic treatment.

History of closed reduction techniques and initial management for shoulder dislocations: From classical antiquity to modern times.

This review gives a summary of the records of shoulder dislocation management throughout history until the point that anaesthetics were introduced and modern medicine improved dislocation management exponentially. A dislocation is a mechanical injury that has been managed in different ways throughout history. The shoulder reduction methods described in Hippocrates Corpus have been described and adjusted throughout history by later physicians. For example, in ancient Greek, Hippocrates considered the ambe, a device used to reduce the shoulder, to be the most powerful tool. However, Cooper, a physician in the 19th century, considered it to be the last resort due to substantial damage to the ribs and discomfort of the patient. This review demonstrates that there were many physicians that contributed to shoulder dislocation management. These physicians paved the way for modern shoulder dislocation treatment strategies.

[Optimal after-treatment of ankle fractures still not clear: a cast or a brace?] / Geen duidelijkheid over beste aanpak bij enkelfractuur.

In a recent article in the BMJ an attempt is made to evaluate the difference in effect of after-treatment with a cast or a brace in case of an ankle fracture. Although the research question is important, the heterogeneity of the researched group is too high to get a practical outcome for our daily practice. The article is discussed and comments are given on possible alterations for future analysis of the presented study group.

Increased failure rates after the introduction of the TFNA proximal femoral nail for trochanteric fractures: implant related or learning curve effect?

Background and purpose - Trochanteric fractures are often treated using intramedullary fixation. In our institution, the TFN-Advanced Proximal Femoral Nailing System (TFNA) was introduced as replacement for the Gamma Trochanteric Nail (GTN3) for the treatment of these fractures as a result of a hospital-driven change of trauma implant supplier. We compared trochanteric fracture fixation failure rate between these 2 intramedullary nails. Patients and methods - All trochanteric fractures treated surgically from 2011 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed for fixation failure. From 2016 only the TFNA was used. Fixation failure was defined as implant cut-out, implant breakage, non-union, malpositioning of the screw/blade requiring reoperation, new fracture around the nail, or miscellaneous. Propensity score matching was used to balance distribution of covariates and to compare failure rates between TFNA and GTN3 groups. Learning curve analyses were performed. Results - After exclusion, 797 GTN3s (779 patients) and 542 (536 patients) TFNAs were available for analysis. A higher risk of fixation failure was found in the TFNA group (14%) compared with the GTN3 group (7.0%) (hazard ratio [HR] 2.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-3.5). This was mainly attributed to a higher risk of cut-out (HR 2.2; CI 0.9-5.7), malpositioning (HR 4.7; CI 0.7-34), and new fracture around the nail (HR 4.0; CI 1.0-16). Learning curve analyses indicated no clear learning curve effect. Interpretation - Failure of fixation increased after a switch from the GTN3 to the TFNA proximal femoral nail for the treatment of trochanteric fractures. Cut-out and malpositioning of the calcar screw or blade appeared to be the most dominant failure mechanisms. Modifications in implant design may have played a role in this increased risk of failure of fixation. In our institution a new implant device was introduced without solid clinical evidence behind it. This study may help to underline the need for medical doctors with a critical and scientific background to be involved in implant choices.

The concordance between preoperative synovial fluid culture and intraoperative tissue cultures in periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review.

Background: this systematic review aims to evaluate the concordance between preoperative synovial fluid culture and intraoperative tissue cultures in patients with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) undergoing total hip (THA) or knee arthroplasty (TKA) revision surgery. Methods: this review was conducted in accordance with the preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA) statement. Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify studies involving patients who had THA or TKA revision surgery for PJI and for whom preoperative synovial fluid culture and intraoperative tissue cultures were performed. Studies were only included if the diagnosis of PJI was based on the EBJIS (the European Bone and Joint Infection Society) or MSIS (Musculoskeletal Infection Society) criteria. Risk of bias was assessed using an amended version of Joanna Briggs Institute's (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for case series. Results: seven studies were included in this review comprising 1677 patients. All studies had a retrospective study design and five studies explored patients undergoing revision surgery of THA or TKA. Concordance rates varied between 52 % and 79 %, but different authors defined and calculated concordance differently. Six studies were judged as having an unclear to high risk of bias and one study as having a low risk of bias. Conclusions: the included studies showed a wide range of concordance rates between preoperative synovial fluid culture and intraoperative tissue cultures and the majority of studies had a high risk of bias. Higher-quality studies are warranted to obtain a more accurate estimate of this concordance rate. We recommend continuing the use of a system such as the EBJIS definition or MSIS criteria when diagnosing PJI.

Alexander 'Lippy' William Lipmann Kessel, from 'Surgeon at Arms' to 'Surgeon of Arms'.

Alexander William Lipmann Kessel (1914-1986) was as surgeon connected to the 16th Parachute Field Ambulance Royal Army Medical Corps and as such he was dropped in The Netherlands in September 1944 to care for the wounded during the battle for the Rhine bridge at Arnhem. His military and post military career were inspirational and led to preservation of lives during the war and progress in orthopaedic surgery after the war. In this paper, we discuss his biography and the contributions he made to orthopaedic surgery.

The influence of bariatric surgery on hip and knee joint pain: a systematic review.

Obesity increases the risk of osteoarthritis and the chance of needing joint replacement arthroplasty to reduce lower limb joint pain. Although nonsurgical weight loss interventions can reduce hip and knee joint pain, bariatric surgery may be a more feasible treatment option for people with severe obesity. However, it is unclear whether weight loss through bariatric surgery can positively influence hip and knee joint pain. Our objective was to evaluate the influence of bariatric surgery on hip and knee joint pain in people with obesity by conducting a systematic review of the literature. The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane bibliographic databases were searched for studies published between 1947 and September 2019. Risk of bias of the identified studies was independently assessed by 2 reviewers using JBI's Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Series and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. This review included 23 studies, all of which evaluated knee pain and 9 of which also evaluated hip pain. Reported results regarding hip pain intensity and the proportion of participants with hip pain were too limited to draw useful conclusions. Reported results regarding knee pain suggest that weight loss after bariatric surgery reduced knee pain intensity, as well as the proportion of participants with knee pain. The overall risk of bias of the majority of included studies (83%; n = 19) was judged to be unclear to high. Four small studies were judged as having a low risk of bias. Results of this systematic review suggest that bariatric surgery can positively influence hip and knee joint pain, but conclusive evidence is lacking because most of the included studies were judged as having plausible bias overall and in their key domains. Well-designed randomized controlled trials evaluating the influence of bariatric surgery on hip and knee joint pain using standardized joint pain measures are needed.

Review of Weaver and Dunn on treatment of acromioclavicular injuries, especially complete acromioclavicular separation.

This classic discusses the original publication "Treatment of acromioclavicular injuries, especially complete acromioclavicular separation" by Weaver and Dunn, which collaborated to develop a technique for acromioclavicular joint reconstruction in 1972. Their surgical technique described resection of 2 cm of the distal clavicle and transfer of the acromial end of the coracoacromial ligament into the medullary canal of the distal clavicle. (modified) Weaver-Dunn procedures have been regarded as one of the most effective techniques to treat complete acromioclavicular joint dislocation for a long time. However, anatomic reconstructions have taken over this position since recent biomechanical studies have demonstrated superior results. Although the Weaver-Dunn procedure has fallen out of favour, it remains of historical significance. For this reason, this review will comprise the historical overview of the Weaver-Dunn procedure, the men behind the eponym and the clinical implication then and now.

The (un)necessity of regular postoperative follow-up of hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative follow-up after hemiarthroplasty is part of routine based practice. However, these visits appear to be a significant burden since it concerns a frail population. The aim of this study was to confirm the current common practice regarding postoperative visits of patients treated with hemiarthroplasty and to evaluate the complication detection rate at these visits. METHODS: A national short survey was conducted among orthopedic surgeons working in 26 large Dutch teaching hospitals to test the hypothesis that postoperative follow-up is indeed common practice. Furthermore, a retrospective patient review was performed in all hemiarthroplasties implanted between January 2014 and December 2019. RESULTS: The response of the national survey was complete and showed that postoperative follow-up in patients treated with hemiarthroplasty is part of standard care according to 89% of respondents. A total of 1055 hips (1026 patients) were implanted with hemiarthroplasty during the studied period. Implant-related complications were identified in 68 hemiarthroplasties, with 31 of these hips going on to reoperation. Only 2 of these complications were picked up at standard planned follow-up leading to a complication detection rate of 0.3%. In contrast, complication detection rates of 47% and 16% were found at unplanned visits at the Emergency Department and the outpatient department, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative follow-up in patients treated with hemiarthroplasty is still the standard of care. However, this study revealed that the majority of implant-related complications are detected at unplanned visits and almost no at standard follow-up visits. Postoperative follow-up of patients treated with hemiarthroplasty could be abandoned in this frail population.