Preliminary field validity of ActiGraph-based energy expenditure estimation in wheelchair users with spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional validation study. OBJECTIVES: To develop a raw acceleration signal-based random forest (RF) model for predicting total energy expenditure (TEE) in manual wheelchair users (MWUs) and evaluate the preliminary field validity of this new model, along with four existing models published in prior literature, using the Doubly Labeled Water (DLW) method. SETTING: General community and research institution in Pittsburgh, USA. METHODS: A total of 78 participants' data from two previous studies were used to develop the new RF model. A seven-day cross-sectional study was conducted to collect participants' free-living physical activity and TEE data, resting metabolic rate, demographics, and anthropometrics. Ten MWUs with spinal cord injury (SCI) completed the study, with seven participants having valid data for evaluating the preliminary field validity of the five models. RESULTS: The RF model achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.59 ± 0.60 kcal/min and a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 23.6% ± 24.3% on the validation set. For preliminary field validation, the five assessed models yielded MAE from 136 kcal/day to 1141 kcal/day and MAPE from 6.1% to 50.2%. The model developed by Nightingale et al. in 2015 achieved the best performance (MAE: 136 ± 96 kcal/day, MAPE: 6.1% ± 4.7%), while the RF model achieved comparable performance (MAE: 167 ± 99 kcal/day, MAPE: 7.4% ± 5.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Two existing models and our newly developed RF model showed good preliminary field validity for assessing TEE in MWUs with SCI and the potential to detect lifestyle change in this population. Future large-scale field validation studies and model iteration are recommended.

Correction: Comparative validity of energy expenditure prediction algorithms using wearable devices for people with spinal cord injury.

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

Comparative validity of energy expenditure prediction algorithms using wearable devices for people with spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional validation study. OBJECTIVES: To conduct a literature search for existing energy expenditure (EE) predictive algorithms using ActiGraph activity monitors for manual wheelchairs users (MWUs) with spinal cord injury (SCI), and evaluate their validity using an out-of-sample dataset. SETTING: Research institution in Pittsburgh, USA. METHODS: A literature search resulted in five articles containing five sets of predictive equations using an ActiGraph activity monitor for MWUs with SCI. Out-of-sample data were collected from 29 MWUs with chronic SCI who were asked to follow an activity protocol while wearing an ActiGraph GT9X Link on the dominant wrist. They also wore a portable metabolic cart which provided the criterion measure for EE. The out-of-sample dataset was used to evaluate the validity of the five sets of EE predictive equations. RESULTS: None of the five sets of predictive equations demonstrated equivalence within 20% of the criterion measure based on an equivalence test. The mean absolute error for the five sets of predictive equations ranged from 0.87 to 6.41 kilocalories per minute (kcal min-1) when compared with the criterion measure, and the intraclass correlation estimates ranged from 0.06 to 0.59. The range between the Bland-Altman upper and lower limits of agreement was from 4.70 kcal min-1 to 25.09 kcal min-1. CONCLUSIONS: The existing EE predictive equations based on ActiGraph monitors for MWUs with SCI showed varied performance when compared with the criterion measure. Their accuracies may not be sufficient to support future clinical and research use. More work is needed to develop more accurate EE predictive equations for this population.