Dynamic hybrid-phase computed tomography simulation in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy: A feasibility study.

To assess the feasibility of dynamic hybrid-phase computed tomography (CTDHP) simulation when patients undergo lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Eighteen non-small-cell lung-cancer patients were immobilised in a stereotactic body frame with abdominal compression. All underwent dynamic hybrid-phase CT scans that were compared with cone-beam CT (CBCT). We also determined the internal target volume (ITV) and evaluated the following four metrics: the "AND" function in the Boolean module of Eclipse, volume overlap (VO), Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and dose-volume histogram. The average ITV values of 4DCTDHP and 3D-CBCT were respectively 12.82±10.42 and 14.6±12.18 cm3 (n=72, p<0.001), and the average ITV value of AND was 11.7±10.1 cm3. The average planning target volume (PTV) of 4DCTDHP and 3D-CBCT was 25.63±18.04 and 28.00±19.82 cm3 (n=72, p<0.001). The median AND difference between ITV and PTV was significant (p<0.01) and had a significantly linear distribution (R2=0.991 for ITV, R2=0.972 for PTV). The average VO of PTV was greater than that of ITV (0.81±0.096; 0.78±0.11). We also observed that the average DSC in PTV (0.83±0.066) was greater than that in ITV (0.81±0.084). The average results indicated that 97.9%±3.44 of ITVCBCT was covered by 95% of the prescribed dose. The average minimum, maximum and mean percentage doses of ITVCBCT were 87.9%±9.46, 107.3%±1.57, and 101.3%±1.12, respectively. This paper has demonstrated that dynamic hybrid-phase CT simulation for patients undergoing lung SBRT and also published evaluation metrics in scientific analysis. Our approach also has the advantage of adequate margin and fewer phases in CT simulation.

Evaluating the benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy after extensive lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: a single-institute retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate whether adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) can improve the treatment outcome of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who underwent extensive lymph node dissection (ELND). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with gastric cancer pathological stages IIA-IIIC at Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital between 2008 and 2015. Patients (a) aged >80 years, (b) with distant metastasis at diagnosis, (c) with coexisting malignancies, (d) who did not complete the prescribed RT course, and (e) who died 1 month after surgery were excluded. Among 420 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer, 98 were included. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 24.5 months. Of 39 patients who underwent adjuvant RT, 38 also received adjuvant chemotherapy (CT). Of 59 patients who did not receive adjuvant RT, only 34 received adjuvant CT. ELND was performed in 67.3% of the patients. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 40%. In the univariate analyses, adjuvant CT regimen, 5-fluorouracil + leucovorin, was associated with worst outcome, while TS-1 was associated with better survival outcome (P = 0.018). The number of involved lymph nodes was strongly related to the OS and disease-free survival (DFS) (P < 0.001). We tried using different numbers of involved lymph nodes as a cutoff point and found that adjuvant RT significantly improved both OS and DFS in patients whose involved lymph nodes were ≥4 (OS, P = 0.017; DFS, P = 0.015). In multivariate analyses, better DFS was associated with negative surgical margin (P = 0.04), earlier disease stage (P = 0.001), adjuvant radiotherapy (P = 0.045), and adjuvant CT regimen TS-1 (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant RT could improve DFS of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer with or without ELND. When the number of involved lymph nodes is ≥4, adjuvant RT is strongly suggested.

Use of electronic portal images to evaluate setup error and intra-fraction motion during free-breathing breast IMRT treatment.

Before delivering of intensity-modulated radiotherapy, kilo-voltage image-guidance radiotherapy is widely used in setup error correction and monitoring intra-fraction motion effectively. Accordingly, this study proposes and tests an image integration technique for observing intra-fraction motion during beam delivery, with the wider objective of reducing both image-guidance time and the dose delivered to normal breast tissue. The study sample comprised 33 female patients with breast cancer, and 241 sets of portal images acquired using a VARIAN aSi-1000 electronic portal imaging device. Motion amplitudes and vectors were collected and calculated separately by two senior therapists. The setup error in 3 axes was computed for every fraction, with average shifting for lateral, longitudinal and vertical direction was -0.3-mm ± 0.5, -0.1-mm ± 0.5 and -0.6-mm ± 1.6, with the average vector of setup error being 2.9-mm ± 1.4. The average intra-fraction motion for vertical direction was (A: -0.1-mm ± 1.0; B: -0.0 ± 1.1), for longitudinal was (A: -0.4-mm ± 1.7; B: 2.0 ± 1.1), and for lateral direction was (A: 0.3-mm ± 1.3; B: 0.2 ± 1.8). The average intra-fraction vector was 2.9-mm ± 1.3 for therapist A, and 3.4-mm ± 1.8 for therapist B. Offline Review commercial software was utilized for setup error and motion analysis, and data analysis and reliability testing were conducted with statistical package of the social sciences. Pearson correlations between the two therapists was moderate (0.59, p << 0.01), and the Cohen's kappa value for inter rater agreement between different evaluators was fair in the anterior-posterior direction (0.25, p << 0.01), with slight agreement in other two directions and vectors. The study presented efficient and dose reduction method to evaluate setup error and intra-fraction motion during breast intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment.

Optimal technique of linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery for tumors adjacent to brainstem.

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a well-established technique that is replacing whole-brain irradiation in the treatment of intracranial lesions, which leads to better preservation of brain functions, and therefore a better quality of life for the patient. There are several available forms of linear accelerator (LINAC)-based SRS, and the goal of the present study is to identify which of these techniques is best (as evaluated by dosimetric outcomes statistically) when the target is located adjacent to brainstem. We collected the records of 17 patients with lesions close to the brainstem who had previously been treated with single-fraction radiosurgery. In all, 5 different lesion catalogs were collected, and the patients were divided into 2 distance groups-1 consisting of 7 patients with a target-to-brainstem distance of less than 0.5cm, and the other of 10 patients with a target-to-brainstem distance of ≥ 0.5 and < 1cm. Comparison was then made among the following 3 types of LINAC-based radiosurgery: dynamic conformal arcs (DCA), intensity-modulated radiosurgery (IMRS), and volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT). All techniques included multiple noncoplanar beams or arcs with or without intensity-modulated delivery. The volume of gross tumor volume (GTV) ranged from 0.2cm(3) to 21.9cm(3). Regarding the dose homogeneity index (HIICRU) and conformity index (CIICRU) were without significant difference between techniques statistically. However, the average CIICRU = 1.09 ± 0.56 achieved by VMAT was the best of the 3 techniques. Moreover, notable improvement in gradient index (GI) was observed when VMAT was used (0.74 ± 0.13), and this result was significantly better than those achieved by the 2 other techniques (p < 0.05). For V4Gy of brainstem, both VMAT (2.5%) and IMRS (2.7%) were significantly lower than DCA (4.9%), both at the p < 0.05 level. Regarding V2Gy of normal brain, VMAT plans had attained 6.4 ± 5%; this was significantly better (p < 0.05) than either DCA or IMRS plans, at 9.2 ± 7% and 8.2 ± 6%, respectively. Owing to the multiple arc or beam planning designs of IMRS and VMAT, both of these techniques required higher MU delivery than DCA, with the averages being twice as high (p < 0.05). If linear accelerator is only 1 modality can to establish for SRS treatment. Based on statistical evidence retrospectively, we recommend VMAT as the optimal technique for delivering treatment to tumors adjacent to brainstem.