The predictive value of conventional surgical risk scores for periprocedural mortality in percutaneous mitral valve repair.

BACKGROUND: Surgical risk scores are used to identify high-risk patients for surgical mitral valve repair. There is no scoring system to estimate the mortality risk for patients undergoing percutaneous treatment. The aim of this analysis is to evaluate the predictive value of the EuroSCOREs and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality Score (STS) for periprocedural mortality in percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair. METHODS: From 2009 to 2013, 136 high-risk patients were included who underwent 143 procedures. Observed periprocedural mortality was compared with predicted mortality using the logistic EuroSCORE, EuroSCORE II and STS. The predictive value was analysed by receiver operating characteristic curves for each score. RESULTS: Observed periprocedural mortality was 3.5 %. The predicted surgical mortality risk was: 23.1 ± 15.7 % for the logistic EuroSCORE, 9.6 ± 7.7 % for the EuroSCORE II and 13.2 ± 8.2 % for the STS. The predictive value estimated by the area under the curve was: 0.55, 0.54 and 0.65 for the logistic EuroSCORE, EuroSCORE II and STS respectively. Severe pulmonary hypertension and acute procedural success were significant predictive parameters in univariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Contemporary surgical scores do not adequately predict periprocedural mortality for high-risk patients undergoing edge-to-edge mitral valve repair, but they can be used to help decision-making in the selection process for this procedure.

Minimal extracorporeal circulation (MECC) does not result in less hypertrophic scar formation as compared to conventional extracorporeal circulation (CECC) with dexamethasone.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiopulmonary bypass surgery is associated with a systemic inflammatory response through the interaction of air, blood and synthetic components in the bypass system and the physical trauma of surgery. An alternative cardiopulmonary bypass system, minimal extracorporeal circulation (MECC), has shown promising results in terms of reducing the inflammatory response. We hypothesized that this system may reduce pathological excessive scarring. To study this assumption, the effects of MECC and the effects of conventional extracorporeal circulation (CECC) with dexamethasone on skin scarring were compared in a standardized wound-healing model. METHODS AND RESULTS: Pre-sternal scars were evaluated prospectively at four and 12 months postoperatively. The height and width of the scars were measured, using a slide caliper and sonography. The scars were scored using the validated Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. Additional risk factors for hypertrophic scar formation were identified by means of a questionnaire. During surgery, MECC was used in 45 patients and CECC/dexamethasone in 42 patients. Four months postoperatively, 22 patients of the MECC group (49%) and 18 patients in the CECC/dexamethasone group (43%) had developed hypertrophic scars. Twelve months postoperatively, the hypertrophic scars in four patients of the MECC group and in two patients of the CECC/dexamethasone group had become normotrophic. In 18 patients of the MECC group (38%) and 16 patients of the CECC group (41%) the scars remained hypertrophic at 12 months. These differences between the two groups were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: MECC does not reduce hypertrophic scar formation compared with CECC with dexamethasone, but its use is more beneficial than the use of CECC/dexamethasone because of the circulatory and immunological advantages and because treatment with dexamethasone can be omitted.

Augmentation of abdominal organ perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass with a novel intra-aortic pulsatile catheter pump.

BACKGROUND: Current pulsatile pumps for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) are far from satisfactory because of the poor pulsatility. This study was undertaken to examine the efficiency of a novel pulsatile catheter pump on pulsatility and its effect on abdominal organ perfusion during CPB. METHODS: Twelve pigs weighing 89+/-11 kg were randomly divided into a pulsatile group (n=6) and a non-pulsatile group (n=6). All animals had a CPB for 120 min, aorta clamped for 60 min, temperature down to 32 degrees C, and a perfusion flow of 60 ml/kg/min. In the pulsatile group, a 21 Fr intra-aortic pulsatile catheter, which was connected to a 40 mL membrane pump, was placed in the descending aorta and activated by a balloon pump driver during the first 90 minutes of CPB until aortic declamping. Hemodynamics, organ blood flow, body metabolism, and blood trauma were studied during experiments. RESULTS: Compared with the non-pulsatile group during CPB, the pulsatile group had a higher systolic blood pressure (p<0.01), higher mean arterial pressure (p<0.05), and higher blood flow to the superior mesenteric artery (p<0.05). The hemodynamic energy, indicated by the energy equivalent pressure (EEP) was higher in the gastrointestinal tract and kidney in the pulsatile group (p<0.01, p<0.01). Abdominal organ perfusion status, as indicated by SvO 2 in the inferior vena cava, was higher in the pulsatile group (p<0.05) 30 min after cessation of CPB. Hemolysis indicated by release of free hemoglobin during CPB was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Applying the pulsatile catheter pump in the descending aorta is effective in supplying the pulsatile flow to the abdominal organs and results in improved abdominal organ perfusion during the ischemic phase of CPB.

Pacemaker dislocation--truly ectopic activation necessitating surgical treatment.

Intra-abdominal migration of a generator from an epicardial pacemaker system is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication. We report on a case of a 2-year-old child in whom the generator silently migrated from the sheath of the rectus abdominis muscle in the upper abdominal wall down into the peritoneal cavity. We advise that if there is any evidence of intra-abdominal migration, the generator should be properly repositioned without delay.