Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Herald of Medicine ; (12): 217-220, 2019.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) | ID: wpr-744218

RESUMO

Objective To investigate the effect of eptazocine hydrobromide on emergence agitation (EA) of patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery at recovery period. Methods One hundred and twenty patients with ASA I or II,scheduled to undergo video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery vats under general anesthesia, were randomly allocated to three groups(n = 40): eptazocine hydrobromide injection group (group E) , dezocine injection group (group D) and sodium chloride injection group (group NS) . Eptazocine hydrobromide injection 0. 3 mg· kg-1, dezocine injection 0. 1 mg· kg-1 and sodium chloride injectionin equal volume were administrated to group E, group D and group NS, respectively, 15 min before the termination of surgery. The operation time,awakening time,extubation time and postanesthesia care unit (PACU) staying time of all patients were recorded. Riker sedation-agitation scores, MAP and HR were documented at the time of awakening (t0) and 10 min (t1) ,20 min (t2) and 30 min (t3) after awakening,and the incidence of EA was also recorded. Results There were no significant differences in operation time,awakening time, extubation time, PACU staying time among three groups(P>0.05) . Compared with the group NS,the riker sedation-agitation scores and MAP in group E and D at t0– t3 were lower, as well as the incidence of EA. HR of group E was lower at t1– t3,while HR of group D was lower at t2 and t3(P<0.05) . Compared with group D,riker sedation-agitation scores and MAPs in group E were lower at t1 and t2, while HR was lower at t2(P<0.05) . However, there was no difference in incidence of EA between group D and group E (P>0.05) . Conclusion Administration 0.3 mg· kg-1 eptazocine hydrobromide,15 min before the termination of surgery, could effectively reduce the incidence of EA in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery after general anesthesia. Simultaneously, awakening time, extubation time and PACU staying time could not prolonged.

2.
Herald of Medicine ; (12): 1348-1351, 2018.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) | ID: wpr-701026

RESUMO

Objective To explore effect of eptazocine hydrobromide combined with sufentanil on postoperative analgesia after trans-urethral resection prostate ( TURP ). Methods One hundred and twenty adult patients undergoing TURP were randomly divided into three groups ( n=40): eptazocine hydrobromide group ( group E), dezocine combined with sufentanyl group (group DS) and eptazocine hydrobromide combined with sufentanyl group (group ES).All patients received postoperative patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA).The patients in the group E were given eptazocine hydrobromide with dose of 1 mg·kg-1;group DS patients were given with dezocine of 0. 3 mg·kg-1combined with sufentanil 1. 5 μg·kg-1;group ES patients were given eptazocine hydrobromide 0.2 mg·kg-1combined with sufentanil 1.5 μg·kg-1.The VAS scores and Ramsay scores were recorded at 1 h (t1), 4 h (t2),8 h (t3), 12 h (t4), 24 h (t5) and 48 h (t6) postoperatively.Total analgesic consumption of PCIA pump and total need of remedial drugs, the incidences of postoperative dizziness, nausea and vomiting, and other adverse reactions during postoperative 48 h were also documented. Results Compared with group E, VAS scores at each time point postoperatively in group DS and group ES were lower (P<0.05);and total analgesic consumption of PCIA pump and total need of remedial drugs were also lower than group E(P<0.05);the incidence of vertigo, nausea and vomiting, dysphoria, drowsiness in group DS were higher(P<0.05);while only the incidence of nausea and vomiting in group ES was higher than group E (P<0.05).Compared with group DS, no statistical significances of VAS scores were found at each time point postoperatively between group DS and group ES (P>0.05);but total analgesic consumption of PCIA pump and the need of remedial drugs in group ES were lower (P<0.05);patients in group ES with lower incidence of respiratory depression, vertigo, dysphoria and drowsiness ( P< 0. 05 ). No statistical significances were found when comparing the Ramsay scores at each time point postoperatively among three groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Eptazocine hydrobromide combined with sufentanyl can effectively alleviate the postoperative pain in patients with TURP, reduce the consumption of postoperative analgesics and incidence of analgesic related adverse reactions.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...