Cup-Cage Construct for Treatment of Severe Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes at a Mean Follow-Up of 7.7 Years.

BACKGROUND: Acetabular reconstruction in the context of massive acetabular bone loss is challenging. Achieving implant stability in these situations requires special considerations. The cup-cage construct is a treatment option that addresses this issue. This study evaluates survivorship, complications, and functional outcomes using the cup-cage construct. METHODS: A total of 131 cup-cage implants (129 patients) were identified from our retrospective review of revision total hip arthroplasties from January 2003 to January 2022. Among these cases, 100 (76.3%) were women, the mean age at the time of surgery was 68 years (range, 29 to 92; SD [SD], 12.4), and the mean follow-up was 7.7 years (range, 0.02 to 20.3; SD, 5.1). Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was conducted with failure defined as revision surgery and/or failure of the cup-cage reconstruction. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 7.7 years, the cup-cage construct survivorship due to all-cause failure was 83.9% (95% CI [confidence interval]: 77.6 to 90.2) at 5 years with 88 hips at risk, 74.8% (95% CI: 66.2 to 83.4) at 10 years with 38 hips at risk, and 69.8% (95% CI: 59.4 to 80.2) at 15 years with 11 hips at risk. The survivorship due to failure from aseptic loosening was 96.7% (95% CI: 93.6 to 99.8) at 5 years with 88 hips at risk and 95.5% (95% CI: 91.6 to 99.4) at 10 and 15 years with 38 and 11 hips at risk, respectively. The revision rate for aseptic loosening of the cup and/or cage, infection, dislocation, and aseptic loosening of the femoral stem was 5 of 131 (3.8%), 12 of 131 (9.1%), 10 of 131 (7.6%), and 2 of 131 (1.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The cup-cage construct is a reliable treatment option for the treatment of various acetabular defects. There are favorable survivorship, clinical, and radiographic outcomes, with a satisfactory complication rate.

Elevated Blood Tantalum Concentrations in Patients Following Reconstruction of Severe Acetabular Defects in Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Modular Tantalum Augments in Combination With Uncemented Tantalum Cups.

INTRODUCTION: The reconstruction of acetabular defects in total hip arthroplasty (THA) can be challenging. An option to treat uncontained acetabular defects is to use modular tantalum augments in combination with cementless press-fit cups. However, modularity is associated with an increased risk of debonding and mechanical failure. In addition, metal wear particles can be released due to micromotions at the implant interface. Clinical data on the long-term results of this treatment strategy is limited. The purposes of this study were: (1) to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcome of complex THA using modular trabecular metal augments and uncemented revision cups; (2) to investigate the blood tantalum concentrations in these patients at mid-term (mean 4.5 year) follow-up; and (3) to report complications and mechanisms of failure related to this procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-center study, we retrospectively reviewed data from a consecutive cohort of 27 patients who underwent complex acetabular defect reconstruction using a modular tantalum acetabular augment in combination with an uncemented tantalum cup. We evaluated the implant survival, and the radiological and clinical outcomes after a mean follow-up of 4.5 years (SD 2.1; range 2.5 to 10.6 years) using patient-reported outcome scores (PROMs). Blood samples were analyzed regarding tantalum concentration and compared with a control group. RESULTS: The cumulative survival rate at 4.5 years with the endpoint "revision of the acetabular component for aseptic loosening" was 94.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 71.6 to 99.2) and 82.9% (95 % CI 60.5 to 93.3) for the endpoint "revision for any reason." The PROMs improved significantly up to the latest follow-up, and radiographic data showed no signs of loosening or implant migration. Median blood tantalum concentrations were significantly higher in the study group (0.15 µg/L) compared to the control group (0.002 µg/L) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated acceptable clinical and radiological results of cementless revision THA using modular trabecular metal implants for the reconstruction of large acetabular defects. Tantalum concentrations were significantly higher in patients who had tantalum implants compared to the control group, however, the systemic and local effects of an increased tantalum exposure are not yet fully understood and have to be further investigated.

3D-printed Personalized Porous Acetabular Component to Reconstruct Extensive Acetabular Bone Defects in Primary Hip Arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVE: Management of extensive acetabular bone defects in total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains challenging. This study aims to investigate the feasibility and preliminary outcomes of 3D-printed personalized porous acetabular components for the reconstruction of acetabular defects in primary THA. METHODS: This retrospective study involved seven patients who received 3D-printed acetabular components in primary THA between July 2018 and March 2021. Preoperatively, acetabular bone defects were evaluated by referencing the Paprosky classification. There were two "Paprosky type IIIA" defects and five "Paprosky type IIIB" defects. The acetabular components were custom-made for each patient to reconstruct the extensive acetabular defects. The hip function was assessed according to the Harris hip score (HHS). Clinical and radiographic outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: The average follow-up period was 40 months, ranging from 26 to 57 months. There were no patients lost to follow-up. The HHS improved from 44 (range: 33-53) before the operation to 88 (range: 79-93) at the final follow-up. Postoperative X-rays showed that the 3D-printed personalized components were properly fitted with the acetabulum. The average center of rotation (COR) discrepancy was 2.3 mm horizontally and 2.1 mm vertically, respectively. Tomosynthesis-Shimadzu metal artifact reduction technology images showed that the implant was in close contact with the host bone. Moreover, no complications were observed during the follow-up period, including loosening, dislocation, or component protrusion. CONCLUSION: The implantation of 3D-printed personalized acetabular components showed accurate reconstruction, stable mechanical support, and favorable function at short-term follow-up. This may be a viable alternative method for reconstructing extensive acetabular defects in THA.

Outcomes of a Double-Cup Construct to Treat Paprosky 3A and 3B Acetabular Defects at a Mean of 39 Months.

BACKGROUND: Modular reconstruction systems based on porous tantalum (PT) prosthetic components have been increasingly used for the treatment of complex acetabular bone defects in revision total hip arthroplasty. We report a novel technique that applies a revision cup as a "super-augment" to form a "double-cup" construct for Paprosky type III defects. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on revision total hip arthroplasty cases, comparing those treated with double-cup constructs (DC group, n = 48) to those treated with PT shells and augments (PT group, n = 48). All procedures were performed at the same institute between 2017 and 2022. Clinical outcome evaluation utilized the Harris Hip Score, Oxford Hip Score, and the 36-Item Short Form Survey. Preoperative and postoperative radiographic assessments measured hip center of rotation (COR) position and leg length discrepancy. Additionally, postoperative complications and implant survivorship were monitored during the follow-up period. RESULTS: The clinical outcomes improved substantially in both groups, which showed no significant difference in the Harris Hip Score (P = .786), the Oxford Hip Score (P = .570), and the 36-Item Short Form Survey (P = .691). Compared to the PT group, the reconstruction COR was significantly closer to the anatomic COR (vertical distance: 2.630 versus 7.355 mm, P = .0034; horizontal distance: 1.881 versus -6.413 mm, P < .0001) in Paprosky 3B type defects. Additionally, postoperative leg length discrepancy was less in the DC group (-8.252 versus -1.821 mm, P = .0008). Dislocation was the main complication in the DC group, and only 1 patient received re-revision due to repeated dislocation. The cumulative survival rate of the DC group (100%; 95% confidence interval 100) was better than the PT group (83.4%; 95% confidence interval 70.5 to 98.6) when re-revisions for aseptic loosening were the endpoint (P = .046). CONCLUSIONS: The DC is a reliable revision technique for the reconstruction of Paprosky type III bone defects. Although dislocation remains challenging, the biomechanically superior restoration achieved by this technique lowers the risk of aseptic loosening.

The role of bone remodeling in measuring migration of custom implants for large acetabular defects.

In revision total hip arthroplasty, achieving robust fixation is difficult and implant movement may occur over time. Bone may also rearrange around the implant as a result of mechanical loading, making the measurement of migration challenging. The study aimed to quantify changes in bone shape and implant position 1 year following acetabular reconstruction using custom three-dimensional-printed cups. This observational retrospective cohort study involved 23 patients with Paprosky type IIIB defects. Postop computed tomography scans taken within 1 week of surgery and at 1-year postsurgery were co-registered and analyzed. Three co-registration strategies were implemented including bone-to-bone and implant-to-implant. (1) Co-registration of the ipsilateral innominate bone (diseased anatomy) was used to measure changes in implant position. (2) Co-registration of the implant was carried out to quantify changes in the ipsilateral innominate bone shape. (3) Co-registration of the contralateral innominate bone (nondiseased anatomy) was performed to measure changes in the ipsilateral innominate bone shape and implant position. The median centroid distances (interquartile range [IQR]) were 2.3 mm (IQR: 3.7-1.7 mm) for changes in implant position, 2.4 mm (IQR: 3.6-1.6 mm) for changes in ipsilateral innominate bone shape, and 3.7 mm (IQR: 4.6-3.5 mm) for changes in ipsilateral innominate bone shape and implant position. Following acetabular reconstruction, implant movements and periprosthetic bone remodeling are physiological and of a similar extent. Surgeons and engineers should consider this when performing implant monitoring in these patients.

Sequelae of Septic Arthritis of Hip in a Child Presenting with Acetabular Defect and Hip Dislocation: A Rare Case Report and Literature Review on Successful Treatment with Steel Osteotomy.

Septic arthritis of the hip in late childhood leads to different sequelae. These cases are often missed and lead to various disabilities like hip subluxation, limb length discrepancy, and limping. The primary goal is always to reproduce a concentrically reduced stable hip. We are presenting a 13-year child with sequelae of septic arthritis of the hip with dislocation. The child had septic arthritis of the hip two years back. The patient had a superolateral acetabular defect and was treated with triple innominate steel osteotomy. The osteotomy increased the acetabular head coverage and gave a stable congruent hip to the child. Late childhood septic arthritis cases can produce acetabular defects without involving the femoral head leading to dislocation. Such cases can be effectively treated with triple innominate pelvic osteotomy, giving good head coverage with stable congruent hips.

Treatment of Severe Acetabular Defects With an Antiprotrusio Cage and Trabecular Metal Augments - Clinical and Radiographic Results After a Mean Follow-Up of 6.6 Years.

BACKGROUND: Large acetabular bone defects present a serious challenge in revision total hip arthroplasty. The off-label use of antiprotrusio cages in combination with tantalum augments is a promising treatment option in these difficult situations. METHODS: Between 2008 and 2013, 100 consecutive patients underwent acetabular cup revision with a cage-augment combination in Paprosky 2 and 3 defect types (including pelvic discontinuities). There were 59 patients available for follow-up. The primary endpoint was the explantation of the cage-and-augment construct. The secondary endpoint was acetabular cup revision for any reason. Also, radiographic and functional outcomes (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Harris Hip Score) were evaluated. Implant survival rates were determined using a Kaplan-Meier analysis. The significance level was set at P < .05. RESULTS: Explantation-free survivorship of the "Cage-and-Augment" system was 91.9% after a mean follow-up of 6.2 years (range, 0 to 12.8). All 6 explantations were due to periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The overall revision-free implant survival rate was 85.7%, including 6 additional liner revisions due to instability. In addition, 6 early PJI occurred, which were successfully treated with debridement, irrigation, and implant retention. We did observe one patient who had radiographic loosening of the construct without necessity for treatment. CONCLUSION: The combination of an antiprotrusio cage with tantalum augments is a promising technique in treating large acetabular defects. A major risk of PJI and instability due to large bone and soft tissue defects needs special attention.

Implantes de titanio trabecular en cirugía de revisión acetabular compleja / Trabecular titanium implants in complex acetabular revision surgery

Introducción: La cirugía de revisión acetabular supone un reto quirúrgico sobre todo cuando aparecen los defectos óseos complejos, pues dificultan la fijación primaria y osteointegración de los implantes, lo que condiciona la aparición de complicaciones. Los cotilos de titanio trabecular intentan solventar estos problemas. Objetivos: Valorar los resultados clínico-radiológicos, la supervivencia de los implantes y aparición de complicaciones a medio plazo en cirugía de revisión acetabular en una serie de 37 recambios acetabulares con defectos óseos tipo IIIA y IIIB de Paprosky en los que se utilizó un implante de revisión tipo Cup-Cage de titanio trabecular. Material y método: Realizamos un estudio observacional, descriptivo y retrospectivo de 37 casos con defectos acetabulares complejos (20 tipo IIIA y 17 tipo IIIB, cinco de ellos con discontinuidad pélvica) en los que se realizó recambio del componente acetabular por implantes de titanio trabecular entre los años 2011 y 2019. Analizamos resultados clínicos (dolor y funcionalidad) y parámetros radiológicos (restauración del centro de rotación de la cadera y la movilización de los implantes), así como la aparición de complicaciones. Resultados: El seguimiento medio fue de 61 meses. Obtuvimos una mejoría en la mediana de 8 puntos en la escala de funcionalidad de Merlé D’Aubigné-Postel y de 6 puntos en la escala EVA de dolor percibido por el paciente. Registramos dos casos de aflojamiento acetabular, un caso de inestabilidad y tres infecciones de herida quirúrgica sin afectar al implante. Conclusiones: La utilización de implantes tipo Cup-Cage de titanio trabecular podría constituir una opción válida en cirugía de revisión acetabular con defectos acetabulares complejos, presentando buenos resultados clínico-radiológicos y en cuanto a complicaciones y supervivencia de los implantes, debido a su buena fijación primaria y osteointegración.(AU)

Introduction: Acetabular revision surgery is a surgical challenge, especially when complex bone defects appear. This makes primary fixation and osseointegration of the implants difficult, which conditions the appearance of complications. Trabecular titanium implants attempt to solve these problems. Objectives: To evaluate our clinical-radiological results, the survival of the implants and the appearance of mid-term complications in acetabular revision surgery in a series of 37 acetabular replacements with Paprosky type IIIA and IIIB bone defects in which a trabecular titanium Cup-Cage revision implant was used. Material and method: We conducted an observational, descriptive and retrospective study of 37 cases with complex acetabular defects (20 type IIIA and 17 type IIIB, five of them with pelvic discontinuity) in which the acetabular component was replaced by trabecular titanium cups between 2011 and 2019. We analyzed clinical results (pain and functionality) and radiological parameters (restoration of the hip rotation centre and the mobilization of the implants), as well as the appearance of complications. Results: The mean follow-up was 61 months. We obtained a median improvement of 8 points on the Merlé D’Aubigné-Postel functionality scale and 6 points on the VAS scale of pain perceived by the patient. We recorded two cases of acetabular loosening, one case of dislocation and three surgical wound infections without affecting the implant. Conclusions: The use of trabecular titanium Cup-Cage implants could be a valid option in acetabular revision surgery with complex acetabular defects, presenting good clinical and radiological results and in terms of complications and survival of the implants, mainly due to their good primary fixation and subsequent osseointegration.(AU)

[Translated article] Trabecular titanium implants in complex acetabular revision surgery / Implantes de titanio trabecular en cirugía de revisión acetabular compleja

Introducción: La cirugía de revisión acetabular supone un reto quirúrgico sobre todo cuando aparecen los defectos óseos complejos, pues dificultan la fijación primaria y osteointegración de los implantes, lo que condiciona la aparición de complicaciones. Los cotilos de titanio trabecular intentan solventar estos problemas. Objetivos: Valorar los resultados clínico-radiológicos, la supervivencia de los implantes y aparición de complicaciones a medio plazo en cirugía de revisión acetabular en una serie de 37 recambios acetabulares con defectos óseos tipo IIIA y IIIB de Paprosky en los que se utilizó un implante de revisión tipo Cup-Cage de titanio trabecular. Material y método: Realizamos un estudio observacional, descriptivo y retrospectivo de 37 casos con defectos acetabulares complejos (20 tipo IIIA y 17 tipo IIIB, cinco de ellos con discontinuidad pélvica) en los que se realizó recambio del componente acetabular por implantes de titanio trabecular entre los años 2011 y 2019. Analizamos resultados clínicos (dolor y funcionalidad) y parámetros radiológicos (restauración del centro de rotación de la cadera y la movilización de los implantes), así como la aparición de complicaciones. Resultados: El seguimiento medio fue de 61 meses. Obtuvimos una mejoría en la mediana de 8 puntos en la escala de funcionalidad de Merlé D’Aubigné-Postel y de 6 puntos en la escala EVA de dolor percibido por el paciente. Registramos dos casos de aflojamiento acetabular, un caso de inestabilidad y tres infecciones de herida quirúrgica sin afectar al implante. Conclusiones: La utilización de implantes tipo Cup-Cage de titanio trabecular podría constituir una opción válida en cirugía de revisión acetabular con defectos acetabulares complejos, presentando buenos resultados clínico-radiológicos y en cuanto a complicaciones y supervivencia de los implantes, debido a su buena fijación primaria y osteointegración.(AU)

Introduction: Acetabular revision surgery is a surgical challenge, especially when complex bone defects appear. This makes primary fixation and osseointegration of the implants difficult, which conditions the appearance of complications. Trabecular titanium implants attempt to solve these problems. Objectives: To evaluate our clinical-radiological results, the survival of the implants and the appearance of mid-term complications in acetabular revision surgery in a series of 37 acetabular replacements with Paprosky type IIIA and IIIB bone defects in which a trabecular titanium Cup-Cage revision implant was used. Material and method: We conducted an observational, descriptive and retrospective study of 37 cases with complex acetabular defects (20 type IIIA and 17 type IIIB, five of them with pelvic discontinuity) in which the acetabular component was replaced by trabecular titanium cups between 2011 and 2019. We analyzed clinical results (pain and functionality) and radiological parameters (restoration of the hip rotation centre and the mobilization of the implants), as well as the appearance of complications. Results: The mean follow-up was 61 months. We obtained a median improvement of 8 points on the Merlé D’Aubigné-Postel functionality scale and 6 points on the VAS scale of pain perceived by the patient. We recorded two cases of acetabular loosening, one case of dislocation and three surgical wound infections without affecting the implant. Conclusions: The use of trabecular titanium Cup-Cage implants could be a valid option in acetabular revision surgery with complex acetabular defects, presenting good clinical and radiological results and in terms of complications and survival of the implants, mainly due to their good primary fixation and subsequent osseointegration.(AU)

[Translated article] Trabecular titanium implants in complex acetabular revision surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Acetabular revision surgery is a surgical challenge, especially when complex bone defects appear. This makes primary fixation and osseointegration of the implants difficult, which conditions the appearance of complications. Trabecular titanium implants attempt to solve these problems. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate our clinical-radiological results, the survival of the implants and the appearance of mid-term complications in acetabular revision surgery in a series of 37 acetabular replacements with Paprosky type IIIA and IIIB bone defects in which a trabecular titanium Cup-Cage revision implant was used. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We conducted an observational, descriptive and retrospective study of 37 cases with complex acetabular defects (20 type IIIA and 17 type IIIB, five of them with pelvic discontinuity) in which the acetabular component was replaced by trabecular titanium cups between 2011 and 2019. We analysed clinical results (pain and functionality) and radiological parameters (restoration of the hip rotation centre and the mobilisation of the implants), as well as the appearance of complications. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 61 months. We obtained a median improvement of 8 points on the Merlé D'Aubigné-Postel functionality scale and 6 points on the VAS scale of pain perceived by the patient. We recorded two cases of acetabular loosening, one case of dislocation and three surgical wound infections without affecting the implant. CONCLUSIONS: The use of trabecular titanium Cup-Cage implants could be a valid option in acetabular revision surgery with complex acetabular defects, presenting good clinical and radiological results and in terms of complications and survival of the implants, mainly due to their good primary fixation and subsequent osseointegration.

Metal Augments Used in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Porous metal augments are used in complex hip arthroplasty; however, few studies have assessed their efficacy and safety. This systematic review analyzed the use of augments in revision hip arthroplasty and summarized the clinical research findings. METHODS: We used combinations of "revision," "replacement," "arthroplasty," "augment," "acetabular," and "hip" to search PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library databases, and clinical trial registration platform "Clinicaltrials" for relevant literature. The functional score, restoration of hip center of rotation, revision of implants, and complications were analyzed. Patients were divided into 3 subgroups according to the mean follow-up period. Overall, 19 reports involving 647 patients (655 hips) were selected. The mean age at the time of surgery was 63 years (range, 24-106) and the mean follow-up duration was 66 months (range, 11-204). RESULTS: Harris Hip Score increased from approximately a mean of 40 points preoperatively to a mean of 84 points postoperatively. The vertical distance between hip center of rotation and teardrop was restored from a preoperative distance of 41.9 to 21.7 mm postoperatively. The overall acetabular revision rate was 4.7%, and the incidence of complications was 8.2%. There were significant differences in the reoperation, acetabular revision, and complication rates among the subgroups. CONCLUSION: Metal augments used in revision hip arthroplasty are a safe and effective treatment option to correct acetabular defects.

Measurement of safe acetabular medial wall defect size in revision hip arthroplasty with a porous cup.

INTRODUCTION: The majority of acetabular revisions can be performed with an uncemented, porous acetabular component with or without bone grafting. These are contained acetabular defects, with an intact acetabular rim (Paprosky type I and II). As defects of the medial wall of the acetabulum are a challenge situation revision surgery, we performed this biomechanical study on a pig pelvis model with contained acetabular defects to determine the size of medial wall defect at which the acetabular cup will have sufficient primary stability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 24 pig pelvis models, different diameter of medial wall defects were created, followed by acetabular component placement. The acetabulum externally loaded, and the force at a level in which the acetabular component remains stable for each diameter of defect, or at which point the acetabular cup moves into the pelvis for >2 mm. RESULTS: In the models with acetabular medial wall defects of 10 and 20 mm, 2 mm acetabular displacement occurred under a force between 1000 and 1500 N. In those with a medial wall defect of 25 mm, the force that caused acetabular instability was between 700 and 1000 N. In the models with 30 mm of medial wall defect all acetabular components were unstable under a force of 700 N. CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, acetabular component should be stable if the defect of the medial wall of the acetabulum is less than 68% of the diameter of the acetabular component or if the uncovered surface area of the acetabular component is not greater than 27%, and the force <700 N. For a load of 1000 N, the medial wall defect should not exceed 45% of acetabular component diameter or 18% of uncovered acetabular component surface.

The analysis of defects in custom 3D-printed acetabular cups: A comparative study of commercially available implants from six manufacturers.

Three-dimensional (3D) printing is used to manufacture custom acetabular cups to treat patients with massive acetabular defects. There is a risk of defects occurring in these, often in the form of structural voids. Our aim was to investigate the presence of voids in commercially available cups. We examined 12, final-production titanium custom acetabular cups, that had been 3D-printed by six manufacturers. We measured their mass, then performed micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) imaging to determine their volume and density. The micro-CT data were examined for the presence of voids. In cups that had voids, we computed (1) the number of voids, (2) their volume and the cup volume fraction, (3) their sphericity, (4) size, and (5) their location. The cups had median mass, volume, and density of 208.5 g, 46,471 mm3 , and 4.42 g/cm3 , respectively. Five cups were found to contain a median (range) of 90 (58-101) structural voids. The median void volume and cup volume fractions of cups with voids were 5.17 (1.05-17.33) mm3 and 99.983 (99.972-99.998)%, respectively. The median void sphericity and size were 0.47 (0.19-0.65) and 0.64 (0.27-8.82) mm, respectively. Voids were predominantly located adjacent to screw holes, within flanges, and at the transition between design features; these were between 0.17 and 4.66 mm from the cup surfaces. This is the first study to examine defects within final-production 3D-printed custom cups, providing data for regulators, surgeons, and manufacturers about the variability in final print quality. The size, shape, and location of these voids are such that there may be an increased risk of crack initiation from them.

Trabecular titanium implants in complex acetabular revision surgery. / Implantes de titanio trabecular en cirugía de revisión acetabular compleja.

INTRODUCTION: Acetabular revision surgery is a surgical challenge, especially when complex bone defects appear. This makes primary fixation and osseointegration of the implants difficult, which conditions the appearance of complications. Trabecular titanium implants attempt to solve these problems. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate our clinical-radiological results, the survival of the implants and the appearance of mid-term complications in acetabular revision surgery in a series of 37 acetabular replacements with Paprosky type IIIA and IIIB bone defects in which a trabecular titanium Cup-Cage revision implant was used. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We conducted an observational, descriptive and retrospective study of 37 cases with complex acetabular defects (20 type IIIA and 17 type IIIB, five of them with pelvic discontinuity) in which the acetabular component was replaced by trabecular titanium cups between 2011 and 2019. We analyzed clinical results (pain and functionality) and radiological parameters (restoration of the hip rotation centre and the mobilization of the implants), as well as the appearance of complications. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 61 months. We obtained a median improvement of 8 points on the Merlé D'Aubigné-Postel functionality scale and 6 points on the VAS scale of pain perceived by the patient. We recorded two cases of acetabular loosening, one case of dislocation and three surgical wound infections without affecting the implant. CONCLUSIONS: The use of trabecular titanium Cup-Cage implants could be a valid option in acetabular revision surgery with complex acetabular defects, presenting good clinical and radiological results and in terms of complications and survival of the implants, mainly due to their good primary fixation and subsequent osseointegration.

Advanced quantitative 3D imaging improves the reliability of the classification of acetabular defects.

INTRODUCTION: Classifying complex acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) by means of conventional radiographs comes with significant limitations. Statistical shape modelling allows the virtual reconstruction of the native pelvic morphology, hereby enabling an analytic acetabular defect assessment. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of advanced imaging augmented with analytic representations of the defect on (1) intra- and inter-rater reliability, and (2) up- or downscaling of classification scores when evaluating acetabular defects in patients undergoing revision THA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The acetabular defects of 50 patients undergoing revision THA were evaluated by three independent, fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons. Defects were classified according to the acetabular defect classification (ADC) using four different imaging-based representations, namely, standard radiographs, CT imaging, a virtual three-dimensional (3D) model and a quantitative analytic representation of the defect based on a statistical shape model reconstruction. Intra- and inter-rater reliabilities were quantified using Fleiss' and Cohen's kappa scores, respectively. Up- and downscaling of classification scores were compared for each of the imaging-based representations and differences were tested. RESULTS: Overall inter-rater agreement across all imaging-based representations for the classification was fair (κ 0.29 95% CI 0.28-0.30). Inter-rater agreement was lowest for radiographs (κ 0.21 95% CI 0.19-0.22) and increased for other representations with agreement being highest when using analytic defect models (κ 0.46 95% CI 0.43-0.48). Overall intra-rater agreement was moderate (κ 0.51 95% CI 0.42-0.60). Intra-rater agreement was lowest for radiographs (κ 0.40 95% CI 0.23-0.57), and highest for ratings including analytic defect models (κ 0.64:95% CI 0.46-0.82). Virtual 3D models with quantitative analytic defect representations upscaled acetabular defect scores in comparison to standard radiographs. CONCLUSIONS: Using 3D CT imaging with statistical shape models doubles the intra- and inter-rater reliability and results in upscaling of acetabular defect classification when compared to standard radiographs. This method of evaluating defects will aid in planning surgical reconstruction and stimulate the development of new classification systems based on advanced imaging techniques.

Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with Severe Acetabular Defect: A Preliminary Exploration and Attempt of Robotic-Assisted Technology.

BACKGROUND: Robotic-assisted technology may be useful in hip revision cases with acetabular defects. However, data on the use of robotic-assisted technology for such complex diseases is lacking. CASE PRESENTATION: This case study described the adoption of MAKO robotic-assisted treatment of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) combined with severe acetabular defect (Paprosky type IIIB). Robotic-assisted technology accurately achieved preoperative planning; the acetabular component and augment were placed in the original position and angle as planned. Robotic-assisted acetabular reaming was successful in a single pass, preserving the remaining acetabular bone mass very well with no procedure-related complications. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) at 6 months postoperatively was 84 and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index was 24. CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted technology can help in the accurate reconstruction of acetabular defect in complex hip revision surgery.

Improvement of surgical time and functional results after do-it-yourself 3D-printed model preoperative planning in acetabular defects Paprosky IIA-IIIB.

INTRODUCTION: The correct positioning of the implant in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) is critical to obtaining substantial functional outcomes, and to avoiding complications. Current literature supports three-dimensional (3D)-printed models as potentially useful tools for preplanning, as well as the "do it yourself (DIY)" methodology to reduce both the time and costs of this procedure. However, no study has determined the efficacy of both methods combined in a cohort of patients with severe acetabular defects. In the lack of bibliography, we performed rTHA after preoperative planning by DIY-3D-printed models to evaluate its influence in: 1) the surgical time, 2) the functional scores, 3) the intra and postoperative complications, and 4) the reconstruction of the center of rotation (COR) of the hip. HYPOTHESIS: Preoperative planning through 3D-DIY printed models will both improve the accuracy of the implant positioning, and the surgical time, leading the latter to improved functional scores and reduced complications. MATERIALS & METHODS: A comparative study of 21 patients with Paprosky IIB to IIIB acetabular defects who underwent rTHA after 3D-printed model preoperative planning by the DIY method between 2016 and 2019 was conducted. A historical cohort of 24 patients served as the comparator. Surgical time, reconstruction of the COR, functional scores, and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 32.4 (range, 12 to 60) months. All the patients showed significant improvement of the Harris hip score (HHS) after the operation (3D group: 26.58±10.73; control group 22.47±15.43 (p=0.00)). In the 3D-printed model preoperative planning group the mean operation time and the intraoperative complications were significantly lower (156.15±43.03min vs 187.5±54.38min (p=0.045); and 19% vs 62.5% (p=0.003), respectively), and the HHS and patient satisfaction score (PSS) were significantly greater (83.74±8.49 vs 75.59±11.46 (p=0.019); and 8.17±0.88 vs 7.36±1.17 (p=0.023), respectively). No differences were found in the postoperative complications, nor in the restoration of the COR as determined from the acetabular index, verticalization or horizontalization, although the acetabular index was closer to the intended one in the 3D-printed model planning group (46.67°±7.63 vs 49.22±8.1 (p=0.284)). CONCLUSION: Preoperative planning of severe acetabular defects through 3D-printed models shortens the surgical time, leading to a decrease in complications and thus to better functional outcomes and greater patient satisfaction. Moreover, the DIY philosophy could decrease both the time and costs of traditional 3D planning. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective case matched study.

Hip Arthroplasty With the Use of a Reconstruction Cage and Porous Metal Augment to Treat Massive Acetabular Bone Loss: A Midterm Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: Acetabular reconstruction in the context of massive acetabular bone loss is challenging. In rare scenarios where the extent of bone loss precludes shell placement (cup-cage), reconstruction at our center consisted of a cage combined with highly porous metal augments. This study evaluates survivorship, complications, and functional outcomes using this technique. METHODS: Patients with minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Baseline characteristics were collected. Preintervention and postintervention ambulatory scores were collected. Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis for cage failure requiring revision surgery was conducted. Binomial regression analysis was performed to assess for correlation of aseptic cage failure with baseline characteristics. Preintervention and postintervention ambulatory aid requirements were compared. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients were identified. Mean follow-up was 6.4 years (range 2.8-11.0). Four (9.8%) aseptic cage revisions were identified. Aseptic KM survival analysis was 87.4% (95% confidence interval 75.3-99.6) at 10 years. Aseptic KM survival was 45.0% versus 92.8% at 9 years (P = .14) for patients with vs without pelvic discontinuity. KM survival for all-cause failure was 61.6% (95% confidence interval 44.0-79.2) at 10 years. Binomial regression did not demonstrate correlation of cage failure with baseline characteristics. Wilcoxon signed-rank test demonstrated a significant reduction in ambulatory aide requirement after surgery (mean rank 11.47 vs 9.00, Z = -2.95, P = .003). CONCLUSION: In scenarios of massive acetabular bone loss where a cup-cage is not a viable option, good survivorship free from aseptic cage failure can be expected at mid-term follow-up using an antiprotrusio cage combined with porous metal augments. Success requires extensive experience in revision surgery.

Porous tantalum shell and augment for acetabular defect reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty: a mid-term follow-up study.

AIM: The use of porous tantalum trabecular metal (TM) shell and augment to reconstruct acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a reliable technique. We evaluated the mid-term implant survival, clinical, and radiological outcomes of our first 48 revisions using this technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 45 patients (48 hips) who had acetabular revision of THA between 2011 and 2017 using TM shell and augment with possible mid-term follow-up were included. Twenty-two patients were men (49%) and 23 were women (51%), mean age was 62.5 years (34 to 85) and mean follow-up was 75 months (54 to 125). Twenty-four hips (50%) had a Paprosky IIIA defect, 14 (29.2%) had a type IIIB defect, six (12.5%) had a type IIC defect, and four hips (8.3%) had a type IIB defect. None of the patients had pelvic discontinuity (PD). RESULTS: At a mean 6.25 years follow-up, all hips remained well-fixed and implant survival of 100% with the need of re-revision as the end point. Screw fixation was used for all shells; augments and the shell-augment interface was cemented. Excellent pain relief (mean WOMAC score pain 90.5, (38.3 to 100)), and functional outcomes (mean WOMAC function 88.3 (31.9 to 100), mean OHS 89.2 (31.8 to 100)) were noted. Patient satisfaction scores were excellent. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated satisfactory mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes of using TM shell and augment for reconstructing major acetabular defects without PD in revision THA.

Modular revision strategy with bispherical augments in severe acetabular deficiency reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Reconstruction of severe acetabular deficiency is extremely challenging in total hip arthroplasty (THA) revisions. Novel bispherical augments were designed to fill acetabular bone loss and facilitate restoration of hip center of rotation (HCOR). Current study aims to compare the outcomes of bispherical augments and tantalum augments. METHODS: Between July 2017 and December 2018, bispherical augments (BA group) were implanted in 25 patients (25 hips) and 22 patients (22 hips) underwent porous tantalum augments (TA group) reconstruction in revision THA. Clinical and radiographic results were evaluated for 25 hips in BA group and 20 hips in TA group at the final follow-up. The mean duration of follow-up was 2.9 years (range, 2.2 ~ 3.7) in BA group and 2.9 years (range, 2.3 ~ 3.8) in TA group. RESULTS: Harris hip scores, HCOR, and leg length discrepancy (LLD) correction did not differ between the treatment groups. The bispherical augments were located more closer to the medial-superior part (zone II) of acetabular shell while the majority of tantalum augments were located at the lateral-superior part (zone I) (P = 0.010). More screws were used in the BA group for augment fixation (mean 2.1 vs. 1.3) (P = 0.000). There was no evidence of loosening or migration in all hips. Only one dislocation occurred in BA group and treated with closed reduction, no recurrence of instability up to the final follow-up. CONCLUSION: The clinical and radiological outcomes of bispherical augments were comparable with tantalum augments; this technique was a reliable alternative method in severe acetabular deficiency reconstruction.