Navigating the Aftermath: A Comprehensive Scoping Review on Follow-up Strategies After Kidney-sparing Surgery for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

Background and objective: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) can be managed efficiently and safely through kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) in selected patient groups. However, the most effective and efficient postoperative surveillance strategy remains undetermined. We aimed to provide a comprehensive synopsis of the follow-up strategies and survival outcomes in patients diagnosed with UTUC treated by KSS. Methods: Following the systematic methodology outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews, we conducted searches in four databases (MEDLINE [Ovid], Embase [Ovid], Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) up until December 11, 2023. Key findings and limitations: A total of 3121 articles underwent screening, of which 19 were selected for inclusion in this review. The follow-up schedules after KSS exhibited considerable variability among the included studies. Diagnostic modalities employed consisted of computed tomography urography (present in 84% of protocols), X urography (21%), ultrasound (21%), thoracic imaging (26%), voided urine cytology (89%), selective upper tract cytology (5.3%), cystoscopy (84%), and ureterorenoscopy (53%) at varying frequencies. At 5 yr of follow-up, the reported recurrence-free survival rate ranged from 30% to 86%, overall survival was 50-92%, and metastasis-free survival was 77-90%. Conclusions and clinical implications: This review unveils significant heterogeneity in clinical practices and survival outcomes, indicating disparities between real-world approaches and guideline recommendations. The lack of consensus on follow-up schemes is evident, emphasising the necessity for future initiatives aimed at developing a comprehensive protocol. Patient summary: This review shows significant heterogeneity in follow-up strategies after kidney-sparing surgery for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. A lack of evidence contributes to discrepancies between guidelines and real-world approaches. Thus, future endeavours should aim at establishing a comprehensive protocol.

Decisional and prognostic impact of diagnostic ureteroscopy in high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A multi-institutional collaborative analysis (ROBUUST collaborative group).

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS) with or without biopsy remains a subject of contention in the management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), with varying recommendations across different guidelines. The study aims to analyse the decision-making and prognostic role of diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS) in high-risk UTUC patients undergoing curative surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective multi-institutional analysis of high-risk UTUC patients from the ROBUUST dataset, a comparison between patients who received or not preoperative URS and biopsy before curative surgery was carried out. Logistic regression analysis evaluated differences between patients receiving URS and its impact on treatment strategy. Survival analysis included 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). After adjusting for high-risk prognostic group features, Cox proportional hazard model estimated significant predictors of time-to-event outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 1,912 patients were included, 1,035 with preoperative URS and biopsy and 877 without. Median follow-up: 24 months. Robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy was the most common procedure (55.1%), in both subgroups. The 5-year OS (P = 0.04) and CSS (P < 0.001) were significantly higher for patients undergoing URS. The 5-year RFS (P = 0.6), and MFS (P = 0.3) were comparable between the 2 groups. Preoperative URS and biopsy were neither a significant predictor of worse oncological outcomes nor of a specific treatment modality. CONCLUSIONS: The advantage in terms of OS and CSS in patients undergoing preoperative URS could derive from a better selection of candidates for curative treatment. The treatment strategy is likely more influenced by tumor features than by URS findings.

Kidney-Sparing Surgery Has Equivalent Oncological Outcomes to Radical Nephroureterectomy for Ureteral Urothelial Carcinoma.

Introduction and Objective: Kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) for upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) has gained increasing interest recently. However, there is limited contemporary data regarding the role of KSS in ureteral urothelial carcinoma. Therefore, we investigated the survival outcomes of ureteral urothelial carcinoma after KSS from a large, prospective international UTUC registry. Methods: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourology Society-Urothelial Carcinomas of the Upper Tract (CROES-UTUC) Registry included patients with UTUC who received KSS or radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) between 2014 and 2019. In this study, we included patients with ureteral UTUC only. Study outcomes included overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), upper tract recurrence-free survival (RFS), intravesical RFS, progression-free survival (PFS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the tumor features' differences between groups. Results: Of the 391 patients with ureteral UTUC, 309 (79.0%) received RNU and 82 (21.0%) received KSS by ureteroscopy with laser ablation (n = 28) or segmental resection (n = 54). After PSM, there were no differences in OS (p = 0.525), CSS (p = 0.487), upper tract RFS (p = 0.147), intravesical RFS (p = 0.989), PFS (p = 0.617), and MFS (p = 0.336) between KSS and RNU. There were no significant differences between ureteroscopic ablation and segmental resection in OS, CSS, intravesical RFS, PFS, and MFS with RNU. Proximal ureteral UTUC had worse OS and CSS outcomes than other tumor locations following segmental resection. Conclusions: In patients with ureteral UTUC, no significant differences in long-term survival outcomes were observed between KSS and RNU. Proximal ureteral UTUC had worse survival outcomes over other tumor locations following segmental resection.

Oncologic outcomes of patients treated with kidney-sparing surgery or radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial cancer: a population-based study.

PURPOSE: Although kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) is a nonminor option for low-risk upper urinary tract urothelial cancer (UTUC), its oncological benefits in high-risk UTUC remain unclear when compared to radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). This study aimed to compare the oncological outcomes of RNU and KSS in patients with UTUC. METHODS: We searched the SEER database for patients treated for primary non-metastatic UTUC with either RNU or a kidney-sparing approach (segmental ureterectomy (SU) or local tumor excision (LTE)) between 2004 and 2018. RESULTS: The study included 6,659 patients with primary non-metastatic UTUC treated with surgery; 2,888 (43.4%) and 3,771 (56.6%) patients presented with ureteral and renal pelvicalyceal tumors, respectively. Finally, 5,479 (82.3%) patients underwent RNU, 799 (12.0%) were treated with SU, and 381 (5.7%) patients received LTE. For confounder control, propensity score matching (PSM) of patients treated with SU and RNU was performed to adjust for T stage, grade, age, gender, tumor size, and lymphadenectomy performance. PSM analysis included 694 patients treated with RNU and 694 individuals who underwent SU. In multivariable Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses, we found no difference in either CSS or OS between RNU and SU, even in the subgroup of high-grade and/or muscle-invasive UTUC including pT3-T4 tumors (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In this population-based study, SU provides equivalent CSS and OS compared to RNU, even in high-risk and locally advanced ureteral cancer. Due to the unavoidable risk of selection bias, further prospective studies are expected to overcome the limitations of this study and support the wider implementation of KSS.

Longer is Better for Endoscopic Follow-up of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma After Ureteroscopic Treatment: An Evaluation Spanning 10 Years of Data.

BACKGROUND: Tumour recurrences are frequent among patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with ureteroscopy (URS). Therefore, guidelines recommend a strict follow-up regimen, but there is little evidence on how to do this. OBJECTIVE: To analyse outcomes during our follow-up regimen and the impact on treatment in terms of ipsilateral UTUC recurrence, treatment conversion, and tumour upgrading, and to evaluate potential prognostic factors, including second-look URS outcomes. A secondary objective was to evaluate survival outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The single-centre cohort included all adult patients with nonmetastatic UTUC treated with URS from January 2010 to December 2020. Follow-up involved endoscopy at 3-mo intervals in the first year, then at 6-mo intervals up to year 3, and yearly thereafter. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Descriptive analyses were performed for the follow-up outcomes. The Andersen-Gill model for recurrent event analysis was used to analyse tumour recurrences, and multivariable Cox regression to analyse for predictors for treatment conversion in low-grade tumours. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: We analysed 71 patients with median follow-up of 49.5 mo. The overall 2-yr recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate was 22%. In low-grade disease, the 1-yr RFS rate was 50% and the 2-yr RFS rate was 29%. Treatment was converted to radical nephroureterectomy for 23 patients, at a median time to conversion of 9.9 mo. Upgrading was seen in 13 patients, at a median time to upgrading of 21.9 mo. No factors were prognostic for either tumour recurrence or treatment conversion. The 5-yr OS, CSS, and MFS rates were 82%, 86%, and 84%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that it is rational to extend endoscopic follow-up for UTUC treated with URS, as clinically relevant events (treatment conversion and tumour upgrading) occur beyond the current 6-mo guideline recommendation. Second-look URS outcomes were not prognostic for tumour recurrence or treatment conversion during follow-up. PATIENT SUMMARY: Our study results show that for patients with cancer of the upper urinary tract treated with kidney-sparing surgery through a small telescope called a ureteroscope (URS), most of the clinically relevant events (treatment conversion and tumour upgrading) occur outside the current recommended follow-up of 6 months. Therefore, URS follow-up should be extended for these patients.

Adjuvant intraluminal therapies for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUCs) are often identified and first treated endoscopically. After proper risk stratification, adjuvant treatment may be recommended. Consequently, as adjuvant therapy becomes more common place in the oncological armamentarium, we seek to better characterize its existing and future therapeutic landscape. In this article, we present an overview of the most up-to-date information about intracavitary instillations as an adjuvant therapy in the context of UTUC. We reviewed the current literature on the epidemiology, disease characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of UTUC with a particularly focus on intraluminal adjuvant therapy for UTUC. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the most recent available data regarding adjuvant therapies used for UTUC. Intraluminal therapy plays an increasingly important role in the management of UTUC. Mitomycin C is the most common adjuvant treatment for UTUC with bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) being utilized to a lesser extent. UGN-101 is a novel topical gel-based therapy that has shown promising results and thus recently garnered Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for UTUC. Other treatments such as BCG-IFN, gemcitabine, docetaxel, and drug-eluting stents (DES) may play a future role in UTUC treatment given further research. It is important to caveat that current studies on topical adjuvant treatments demonstrate varying degrees of effectiveness. This is largely due to limited research on UTUC, consisting of small sample sizes, and mostly retrospective experiences. Accordingly, further clinical trials are needed to evaluate the true benefit of these treatments.

Modern Kidney-Sparing Management of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To review the latest evidence on the modern techniques and outcomes of kidney-sparing surgeries (KSS) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS: A comprehensive literature search on the study topic was conducted before 30 April 2023 using electronic databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. A narrative overview of the literature was then provided based on the extracted data and a qualitative synthesis of the findings. RESULTS: KSS is recommended for low- as well as select high-risk UTUCs who are not eligible for radical treatments. Endoscopic ablation is a KSS option that is associated with similar oncological outcomes compared with radical treatments while preserving renal function in well-selected patients. The other option in this setting is distal ureterectomy, which has the advantage of providing a definitive pathological stage and grade. Data from retrospective studies support the superiority of this approach over radical treatment with similar oncological outcomes, albeit in select cases. Novel chemoablation agents have also been studied in the past few years, of which mitomycin gel has received FDA approval for use in low-risk UTUCs. CONCLUSION: KSSs are acceptable approaches for patients with low- and select high-risk UTUCs, which preserve renal function without compromising the oncological outcomes.

Postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who underwent kidney-sparing surgery (KSS): a single-center study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who underwent kidney-sparing surgery (KSS). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 31 patients with primary UTUC who underwent kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) and who were treated with adjuvant radiotherapy at our center between October 1998 and May 2017. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 23.0. The primary endpoints of this study included overall survival (OS) and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS); the secondary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and treatment-related toxicity. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 58.4 months (range, 12.7-185.3 months), and the median local recurrence time was 59.0 months (range, 7.0-185 months). All of the patients completed radiotherapy on schedule, and no grade 3-4 late-stage reaction was observed. The estimated 5-year and 10-year OS, DFS and LRFS rates of the patients were 64.0%, 61.1%, 69.6% and 48.0%, 40.9%, 64.6%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that age (χ2 = 4.224, P = 0.040), R0 resection (χ2 = 3.949, P = 0.047), and early stage (I + II) (χ2 = 6.515, P = 0.011) were associated with good OS; DFS benefit in early stage patients (χ2 = 6.151, P = 0.013) and age<70 years old (χ2 = 5.091, P = 0.024). Patients with distal ureteral segments had better LRFS than patients with proximal ureteral cancer (χ2 = 5.248, P = 0.022). However, multivariate analysis showed that age was the only factor of OS (χ2 = 4.099, P = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant radiotherapy is safe and tolerated, and LRFS was superior in middle and distal ureteral cancer than in proximal ureteral cancer.

Kidney sparing surgery in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: paradigm change in surgical treatment for ureter cancer.

PURPOSE: To extend the indications of kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) for ureter cancer by comparing the oncological outcomes between patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) or KSS. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 708 patients with UTUC who underwent RNU (N = 646) or KSS (N = 62) between 2011 and 2019 to analyze the oncologic outcomes and prognostic factors. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with unifocal ureteral urothelial carcinoma (UC). RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in the overall survival (OS) or cancer-specific survival (CSS) between RNU and KSS (distal ureterectomy with reimplantation (N = 33), ureterectomy with ileal ureter (N = 14), ureteroscopic tumor resection (N = 10), and ureterectomy with ureteroureterostomy (N = 5)). Among 269 (38.0%) patients with unifocal ureteral UC, 219 and 50 patients underwent RNU and KSS, respectively. OS and CSS were not significantly different between these two groups. Pathologic stage was a significant risk factor in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio = 2.621; p = 0.000). Among 646 RNU patients, 219 (33.9%) had unifocal ureteral UC, 40 (18.3%) with low-grade tumors. Among these, 13 (5.9%) patients with unifocal, low-grade and small (< 2 cm) tumors received nephroureterectomy. CONCLUSION: Kidney-sparing surgery should be regarded as an important alternative to RNU for patients with unifocal ureteral UC thought to have noninvasive disease to preserve renal function and reduce overtreatment.

The useful technique of laparoscopic segmental ureterectomy with ureteral reimplantation for distal upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Segmental ureterectomy (SU) has been proven effective in cases of distal upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Nonetheless, SU has been performed infrequently in the real world, and there is no consensus on the preferred surgical technique in laparoscopic surgery. We describe our first experience of laparoscopic segmental ureterectomy (LSU) with psoas hitch ureteral reimplantation. MATERIALS AND SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: LSU starts using a fan-shaped, five-port, transperitoneal approach. First, the cancerous ureter segment is clipped to avoid tumor seeding, and then the diseased segment is dissected. Second, the psoas hitch is performed by fixing the external part of the ipsilateral dome of the bladder to the psoas muscle and its tendon. Third, at the top of the bladder, an incision is made in the muscle layer and mucosa. The ureter is then spatulated. A guide wire is used to place a retrograde ureteral double J stent. Finally, the anastomosis of the bladder and ureter mucosa is performed by interrupted suturing of both ends, followed by continuous suturing, and the muscular layer of the bladder is closed in a double layer. We performed LSU for distal UTUC in 10 patients. There was no decrease in renal function before or after surgery. During follow-up, three patients experienced a recurrence of urothelial carcinoma in the bladder and one patient had a local recurrence. DISCUSSION: LSU is a safe and feasible procedure in our experience, and it can be recommended for selected cases of distal UTUC with optimal perioperative, renal functional, and oncologic outcomes.

[Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract]. / Urothelkarzinom des oberen Harntrakts.

Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract (upper tract urothelial carcinoma, UTUC) is less common than bladder carcinoma with nearly identical risk factors and has a poorer prognosis. The standard diagnostic procedure is imaging of the upper urinary tract by computed tomography urography. In cases of diagnostic uncertainty, a diagnostic ureterorenoscopy with biopsy sampling can be performed in addition to urine cytology. Treatment depends primarily on the stage and grading of the tumor. Depending on the extent and localization, organ-preserving treatment or radical nephroureterectomy is indicated. Perioperative systemic treatment in high-risk UTUC can be performed in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, although the current data on neoadjuvant chemo- and immunotherapy do not yet allow standard application. For metastatic disease, a multimodal treatment approach consisting of cisplatin-based or carboplatin-based chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and treatment with enfortumab vedotin can be considered. Salvage surgery, radiotherapy and metastasectomy are available for rare individual cases.

Segmental ureterectomy for high-risk ureteral carcinoma: a preliminary report.

BACKGROUND: EAU guidelines strongly recommend kidney sparing surgery (KSS) as the primary treatment option for the low-risk UTUC patients. While there are few reports involving the KSS treated for the high-risk counterparts, especially the ureteral resection. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the segmental ureterectomy (SU) for the patients with high-risk ureteral carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 20 patients from May 2017 to December 2021 who underwent segmental ureterectomy (SU) in Henan Provincial People's Hospital. The overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were evaluated. Besides, the ECOG scores and postoperative complications were also included. RESULTS: As of December 2022, the mean OS was 62.1months (95%CI:55.6-68.6months) and the mean PFS was 45.0months (95%CI:35.9-54.1months). The median OS and median PFS were not reached. The 3-year OS rate was 70% and the 3-year PFS rate was 50%. The percentage of Clavien I and II complications was 15%. CONCLUSION: For the selected patients with high-risk ureteral carcinoma, the efficacy and safety of segmental ureterectomy were satisfactory. But we still need to conduct prospective or randomized study to validate the value of SU in patients with high-risk ureteral carcinoma.

Case Report: Step-by-step procedures for total intracorporeal laparoscopic kidney autotransplantation in a patient with distal high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

A 47-year-old man presented to the emergency department with right abdominal pain and a new onset of painless haematuria two weeks earlier. Urine cytology test results suggested urothelial carcinoma. Computed tomography urography (CTU) showed a filling defect in the lower right ureter with right hydronephrosis. Lymphadenopathy and any signs of metastatic disease were absent on CTU. Cystoscopy appeared normal. Creatinine level was also normal before surgery. After the treatment options were discussed, the patient chose to undergo 3D total intracorporeal laparoscopic kidney autotransplantation, bladder cuff excision, and segmental resection of the proximal two-thirds of the ureter based on the membrane anatomy concept. After more than one year of follow-up, the patient was in good health and showed no signs of haematuria. Surveillance cystoscopy and CTU examination showed no evidence of disease recurrence. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that kidney-sparing surgery may be considered for carefully selected patients with high-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Mitomycin Gel (UGN-101) as a Kidney-sparing Treatment for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma in Patients with Imperative Indications and High-grade Disease.

BACKGROUND: Intracavitary UGN-101 is approved for the treatment of low-grade noninvasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Post-commercialization studies underscore the benefit of UGN-101 administration for patients with imperative indications for whom radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is not a viable option. OBJECTIVE: To describe the use, efficacy, and safety of UGN-101 in patients with UTUC with imperative indications for renal preservation, including high-grade disease. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients receiving UGN-101 with imperative indications were retrospectively analyzed using a multicenter centralized registry from 15 high-volume academic and community centers. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: We defined imperative indications as patients with a solitary kidney, the presence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) with a glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min, bilateral UTUC, and patients unfit for or unwilling to undergo surgical extirpation. Tumor characteristics, disease progression/recurrence, and adverse events were recorded on a per-renal-unit basis. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: UGN-101 was instilled into 52 renal units (38%) in 48 patients for imperative indications, including 29 patients (56%) with a solitary kidney, 11 kidneys (21%) in the setting of bilateral UTUC, six patients (12%) with CKD, and six patients (12%) who were unfit for or unwilling to undergo RNU. Twelve renal units had biopsy-proven high-grade papillary disease. Tumors were completely ablated before induction therapy in 34% of cases, while 66% had tumor present. Following induction therapy, 17 patients (40%) had no evidence of disease (NED) on ureteroscopy, 88% of whom maintained this status at median follow-up of 10.8 mo. In the cohort with high-grade disease, five patients (45%) had NED at initial post-induction primary disease evaluation. Adverse events included pyelonephritis (8%), ureteral stenosis (8%), anemia (6%), and acute renal failure (4%). Limitations include the retrospective study design, the lack of long-term follow up, and patient selection bias. CONCLUSIONS: Intracavitary therapy with UGN-101 in patients with UTUC and imperative indications shows promise as a kidney-sparing treatment modality. While long-term follow-up is needed, this intracavitary treatment may help in prolonging time to RNU and delaying the morbidity of hemodialysis in this comorbid population. PATIENT SUMMARY: We reviewed results for patients with cancer in the upper urinary tract and an additional condition that would not allow kidney removal who received treatment with a gel called UGN-101. Our results suggest that UGN-101 shows promise as a kidney-sparing treatment. It may delay the time until kidney removal is needed in these patients and avoid the negative effects associated with dialysis.

Optimization of postoperative surveillance protocols in upper tract urothelial cancer: A retrospective cohort study.

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is an aggressive disease that is managed by radical or organ-sparing surgery. High recurrence rates require early detection and strict follow-up (FU) protocols. Recommendations are assigned to a low level of evidence. Our aim was to identify time-to-tumor recurrence, analyze the temporal relation to recommended FU regimens, and provide a critical proposal for further surveillance. This retrospective study included 54 patients receiving radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in high-risk UTUC and 14 patients assigned to kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) with low-risk disease. FU surveillance protocols consisted of close intervals irrespective of the received type of surgery. In total, 68 patients were included with a median FU of 23 months. Mean overall survival (OS) was significantly shorter in RNU compared to KSS (P = .027). Recurrence in the bladder and/or upper urinary tract (UUT) was 57.1% in KSS and 38.9% after RNU (P = .241). Mean recurrence-free survival (RFS) was significantly shorter in RNU patients compared to KSS (22.4 vs. 47.9 months, P = .013), and 76.2% of the recurrences in the RNU group occurred in the first postoperative year. UUT recurrence was diagnosed after a median of 3.0 (RNU) and 25.0 (KSS) months. There was a frequent onset of metastases in the RNU group, with 85.7% in the first year compared to the KSS group with 50%. Multivariable regression analysis showed that the tumor stage was the parameter independently related to OS (P = .002), RFS (P = .008), and metastasis-free survival (MFS, P = .002). In conclusion, surveillance of UTUC should be adapted to real-time occurrence patterns. Strict imaging protocols are recommended in the first two years irrespective of the method of surgery. As recurrence is equally distributed over the years after KSS, cystoscopy should be offered regularly for five years and diagnostic URS for three years. After RNU, cystoscopies should be decreased to yearly intervals after year three. Contralateral UUT should also be examined after RNU.

A Review of How Lasers Are Used in UTUC Surgery: Can the Choice of Laser Affect Outcomes?

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a relatively rare disease with an aggressive phenotype compared to urothelial carcinoma in the bladder. In recent years, kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) and, in particular, endoscopic surgery have become the procedure of choice among urologists where the treatment of localized UTUC is concerned. Endoscopy tends to result in satisfactory oncological disease control while lowering morbidity and minimizing complications amongst the appropriately selected cohort of patients. While endoscopic surgery for UTUC might appear to be standardized, it, in fact, differs considerably depending on the source of energy used for resection/ablation. There has been little reliable data up to now on which laser energy source is the most superior. The goal of this review is, therefore, to outline the results of endoscopic UTUC treatment using different lasers and to analyze how these laser-tissue interactions may affect the surgery. We start by pointing out that the data remains insufficient when trying to determine which laser is the most effective in the endoscopic management of UTUC. The ever-growing number of indications for minimally invasive treatment and the increasing number of centers using laser surgery will, hopefully, lead to novel randomized controlled trials that compare the performance characteristics of the lasers as well as the effects of UTUC on patients.

Oncologic and Safety Outcomes for Retrograde and Antegrade Endoscopic Surgeries for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

The aim of this study was to identify and summarize available data on oncologic and safety outcomes for retrograde versus antegrade endoscopic surgery in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). We systematically searched studies reporting on endoscopic surgery in patients with UTUC. The primary outcome of interest was oncologic control, including bladder and upper urinary tract recurrences. The secondary outcomes were any-grade and major complications. Twenty studies comprising 1091 patients were included in our analysis. The pooled bladder recurrence rate was 35% (95% confidence interval [CI] 28.0-42.3%; I2 = 48%) after retrograde endoscopic surgery and 17.7% (95% CI 6.5-32.1%; I2 = 29%) after antegrade endoscopic surgery. The pooled upper urinary tract recurrence rate was 56.4% (95% CI 41.2-70.9; I2 = 93%) after retrograde endoscopic surgery and 36.2% (95% CI 25.5-47.6%; I2 = 57%) after antegrade endoscopic surgery. The pooled complication rate was 12.5% (95% CI 0.8-32.8%; I2 = 94%) for any-grade complications and 6.6% (95% CI 0.1-19.1%; I2 = 89%) for major complications in the retrograde endoscopic cohort. In summary, our analyses suggest promising oncologic benefits of antegrade kidney-sparing surgery in terms of bladder and upper urinary tract recurrence rates in UTUC. Retrograde endoscopic surgery is a safe procedure with a minimal risk of complications and acceptable oncologic outcomes. Research should address the hypothesis that endoscopic antegrade surgery can be a safe and effective alternative for well-selected patients. PATIENT SUMMARY: One of the surgical options for treatment of cancer of the upper urinary tract is removal of the tumor through a small telescope called an endoscope. The endoscope can be inserted via the urethra (called a retrograde approach) or through a small incision in the skin (antegrade approach). Our review shows that the antegrade approach seems to provide acceptable cancer control rates. Further research could help to identify the role for endoscope surgery in cancer of the upper urinary tract.

Concomitant Bladder Tumor Is a Risk Factor for Bladder Recurrence but Not Upper Tract.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of UTUC patients with or without concurrent bladder tumor. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourology Society-Urothelial Carcinomas of the Upper Tract (CROES-UTUC) Registry included 1134 UTUC patients with or without concurrent bladder tumor treated between 2014 and 2019. RESULTS: In 218 (19.2%) cases, concurrent bladder tumor was present, while in 916 (80.8%) patients, no bladder cancer was found. In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, concomitant bladder tumor (hazard ratio (HR) 1.562, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.954-2.560, p = 0.076) indicated a trend associated with recurrence-free survival for UTUC. Further data dissection confirmed that concomitant bladder tumor is a risk factor of bladder recurrence (HR 1.874, 95% CI 1.104-3.183, p = 0.020) but not UTUC recurrence (HR 0.876, 95% CI 0.292-2.625, p = 0.812). Kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) (HR 3.940, 95% CI 1.352-11.486, p = 0.012), pathological T staging ≥ pT2 (HR 2.840, 95% 1.039-7.763, p = 0.042) were significantly associated with UTUC recurrence. KSS does not affect bladder recurrence (HR 0.619, 95% CI 0.242-1.580, p = 0.315). A limitation is the retrospective nature of the present study analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of concomitant bladder tumor does not increase risk of UTUC recurrence, but it results in an increased risk of bladder recurrence. KSS does not affect bladder recurrence and can still be considered in patients with concomitant bladder tumor.

Construction and Verification of Immunohistochemistry Parameters-Based Classifier to Predict Local-Recurrence of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma After Kidney-Sparing Surgery.

Background: Kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) for upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUCs) has been gradually performed in selected patients beyond the recommendation of guidelines. However, there is still a lack of tools to evaluate postoperative local recurrence. Herein, a new nomogram was established to predict the local recurrence risk after KSS. Methods: Patients were randomly divided into two cohorts (training: testing cohorts = 7:3). Cancer samples after KSS were used for immunohistochemical tests to detect molecules missing in previous pathology reports. Then, the total number of molecules were screened by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method to construct an IHCscore, which was further tested in the validation cohort. Finally, the IHCscore and other clinicopathologic parameters were combined to develop a more accurate model using univariate and multivariate Cox regression methods. Results: In total, 200 patients were included. The Kaplan-Meier test showed that high Ki-67 and loss of Uroplakin III and E-cadherin were correlated with poor recurrence-free survival. The individual IHCscore was calculated based on the expression levels of Ki-67, Her2 and E-cadherin. Based on the IHC score, patients were further classified as low- or high-risk, and a significant difference in the recurrence-free survival was observed between the two groups. Then, the nomogram was developed based on Gender, surgical margin and IHCscore; this nomogram had a higher AUC (0.847) in predicting 3-year recurrence-free survival than the IHCscore alone (0.788). Conclusions: This easy-to-use nomogram shows better prediction accuracy in recurrence-free survival after KSS and may guide individualized intravesical chemotherapy. However, a larger sample is required for external validation.

Survival and Long-term Effects of Kidney-sparing Surgery Versus Radical Nephroureterectomy on Kidney Function in Patients with Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

Background: Current European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines discriminate between high- and low-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) to determine treatment by means of radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) or kidney-sparing surgery (KSS). Objective: To compare long-term oncological outcomes and renal function for patients with UTUC treated by RNU versus KSS. Design setting and participants: A retrospective cohort study, including 186 renal units with nonmetastatic UTUC treated in a tertiary referral centre between 2010 and 2021, was conducted. Intervention: RNU, ureterorenoscopy, percutaneous tumour resection, and segmental ureteral resection. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival (MFS), overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and renal function were analysed by means of the log-rank test and the independent-sample t test. Results and limitations: OS was 71.1% for the RNU group and 81.9% for the KSS group. In a cohort matched for propensity weight based on EAU risk stratification progression-free survival (PFS; RNU 96.0%; KSS 86.0%), MFS (RNU 72.0%; KSS 84.0%), CSS (RNU 84.0%; KSS 86.0%), and OS (RNU 76.0%; KSS 76.0%) were all similar between both groups. No significant differences in renal function were seen at 2 and 5 yr after the intervention. Although this series represents the largest cohort of (high-risk) UTUC patients treated by means of KSS to date, it is not suitable for performing a multivariate analysis. Conclusions: PFS, MFS, CSS, and OS were all comparable when analysing the RNU and KSS groups. Similar results for groups with evenly distributed risk factors and a large percentage of high-risk disease suggest that current risk stratification might not be accurate in discriminating low-risk from high-risk disease. Patient summary: In this report, we looked at outcomes for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in a specialised hospital. We conclude that kidney-sparing surgery and radical nephroureterectomy have comparable outcomes and that risk factors for worse outcome might not be identified correctly.