Evolution of the human pelvis and obstructed labor: new explanations of an old obstetrical dilemma.

Without cesarean delivery, obstructed labor can result in maternal and fetal injuries or even death given a disproportion in size between the fetus and the maternal birth canal. The precise frequency of obstructed labor is difficult to estimate because of the widespread use of cesarean delivery for indications other than proven cephalopelvic disproportion, but it has been estimated that at least 1 million mothers per year are affected by this disorder worldwide. Why is the fit between the fetus and the maternal pelvis so tight? Why did evolution not lead to a greater safety margin, as in other primates? Here we review current research and suggest new hypotheses on the evolution of human childbirth and pelvic morphology. In 1960, Washburn suggested that this obstetrical dilemma arose because the human pelvis is an evolutionary compromise between two functions, bipedal gait and childbirth. However, recent biomechanical and kinematic studies indicate that pelvic width does not considerably affect the efficiency of bipedal gait and thus is unlikely to have constrained the evolution of a wider birth canal. Instead, bipedalism may have primarily constrained the flexibility of the pubic symphysis during pregnancy, which opens much wider in most mammals with large fetuses than in humans. We argue that the birth canal is mainly constrained by the trade-off between 2 pregnancy-related functions: while a narrow pelvis is disadvantageous for childbirth, it offers better support for the weight exerted by the viscera and the large human fetus during the long gestation period. We discuss the implications of this hypothesis for understanding pelvic floor dysfunction. Furthermore, we propose that selection for a narrow pelvis has also acted in males because of the role of pelvic floor musculature in erectile function. Finally, we review the cliff-edge model of obstetric selection to explain why evolution cannot completely eliminate cephalopelvic disproportion. This model also predicts that the regular application of life-saving cesarean delivery has evolutionarily increased rates of cephalopelvic disproportion already. We address how evolutionary models contribute to understanding and decision making in obstetrics and gynecology as well as in devising health care policies.

"New or not-so-new" labor management practices and cesarean delivery for arrest of progress.

BACKGROUND: Because nearly one-third of births in the United States are now achieved by cesarean delivery, comprising more than 1.27 million women each year, national organizations have recently published revised guidelines for the management of labor. These new guidelines stipulate that labor arrest should not be diagnosed unless ≥6 cm cervical dilatation has been reached or labor has been stimulated for at ≥6 hours. OBJECTIVE: To determine the cervical dilatation and hours of labor stimulation prior to cesarean delivery for arrest of dilatation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1, 1999, andDecember 31, 2000, a prospective observational study of all primary cesarean deliveries was conducted at 13 university centers comprising the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute for Child Health and Human Development, Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. This secondary analysis includes all live-born, singleton, nonanomalous, cephalic gestations delivered by primary cesarean delivery at ≥37 weeks. A cesarean delivery was considered to have been performed for arrest of dilatation if the indication for the procedure was failure to progress, cephalopelvic disproportion, or failed induction. Augmentation was defined as stimulation after spontaneous labor had been previously diagnosed. Analysis included both the latent and active phases of labor. The active phase of labor was diagnosed when cervical dilatation was ≥4 cm in the presence of uterine contractions. RESULTS: A total of 13,269 primary cesarean deliveries were available for analysis, 8,546 (65%) of which were performed for inadequate progress of labor with cervical dilatation recorded at the time of cesarean delivery. Of these cesarean deliveries for labor arrest, a total of 719 (8%) were performed in the latent phase of labor and 7827 (92%) were performed when cervical dilatation was ≥4 cm (active phase). Approximately two-thirds (n = =5876; 69%) received intrauterine pressure monitoring. A total of 5636 women (66% of those reaching the active phase of labor) had reached ≥6 cm cervical dilatation before cesarean delivery was performed. Moreover, 7440 (95%) of the 7827 women in active labor had ≥6 cm dilatation or had received labor stimulation ≥6 hours prior to cesarean delivery for arrest of dilatation. CONCLUSION: Women undergoing primary cesarean delivery for arrest of dilatation 15 years before the recommendations of the Obstetrics Care Consensus had received bona fide efforts to achieve adequate labor consistent with the recommendations of the Consensus. Because 95% of these women had ≥6 cm dilatation or had received labor stimulation ≥6 hours prior to cesarean delivery for arrest of dilatation, these new recommendations are unlikely to change the cesarean delivery rates.

Prevalence and Indications of Cesarean Section in a Community Hospital of Western Region of Nepal.

INTRODUCTION: Cesarean section is one of the common obstetric procedures done when the childbirth is not anticipated to occur by the normal vaginal delivery. There has been increased rate of cesarean section globally as well as in our country in recent decades. METHODS: This descriptive cross-sectional study has been carried out by reviewing a year of data from maternity ward of Paschimanchal Community Hospital, Prithvi Chowk, Pokhara. The total number of delivery, their modes either vaginal or cesarean, indications for the cesarean section and their outcomes were analyzed. The obtained data was entered and analyzed in Microsoft Excel. RESULTS: Total of 257 cases underwent delivery during the study period and 174 (63.27%) were by cesarean section. Oligohydramnios is the most common indication for cesarean section. Around 25 (14.36%) of the women underwent repeat cesarean section. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of cesarean section was quite high in our study and further studies are recommended for understanding of causes and other associated factors with it.

Emergency cesarean section rate between women with gestational diabetes and normal pregnant women.

OBJECTIVE: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) has been related to various maternal and neonatal complications. The degree to which GDM is related to an increased rate of cesarean section is less certain. This study was aimed at comparing the incidence of emergency cesarean delivery between pregnant women with GDM and normal pregnant women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study group consisted of 237 term, singleton pregnant women with GDM. Another 237 uncomplicated, normal pregnant women were randomly selected and served as the comparison group. Those who were scheduled for elective cesarean delivery and overt DM were excluded. Data were retrieved from medical records, including demographic data, antenatal and intrapartum care data, route of delivery, indications for cesarean delivery, and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: The study group had a significantly higher mean age and body mass index, and the participants were more likely to be overweight/obese. The rate of emergency cesarean delivery was significantly higher in the study group than in the comparison group (31.6% vs. 19.4%, p = 0.002). The study group was more likely to have Cephalo-pelvic disproportion (CPD) (20.3% vs. 13.1%, p = 0.036) as an indication for cesarean delivery. Birth weight was significantly higher (by 200 g) in the study group. When stratified by parity, significant differences in cesarean delivery rates were observed only among nulliparous women. Logistic regression analysis showed that GDM significantly increased the risk of emergency cesarean delivery (adjusted odds ratio 1.9, 95% confidence interval 1.03-3.5, p = 0.039) only among nulliparous women, adjusted for age, body mass index, and gestational weight gain. CONCLUSION: The incidence of emergency cesarean delivery increased significantly among nulliparous GDM pregnant women, compared with that in normal pregnant women.

A cross-sectional study of indications for cesarean deliveries in Médecins Sans Frontières facilities across 17 countries.

OBJECTIVE: To review the major indications for cesareans performed by Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) personnel from the Operational Center Brussels. METHODS: A retrospective study was undertaken of all singleton cesarean deliveries from 2008-2012 for which indications were recorded. Location of project, age of patient, type of anesthesia, and duration of operation were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 14 151 singleton cesarean deliveries were identified from 17 countries. Among the 15 905 indications recorded, the most common was failure to progress or cephalopelvic disproportion (4822 [30.3%]), followed by previous uterine scar (2504 [15.7%]), non-reassuring fetal status (2306 [14.5%]), and fetal malpresentation (1746 [11.0%]). Other indications were placenta or vasa previa (794 [5.0%]), uterine rupture (676 [4.3%]), hypertensive disorders (659 [4.1%]), placental abruption (520 [3.3%]), pre-rupture (450 [2.8%]), and cord prolapse (365 [2.3%]). CONCLUSION: Indications for cesareans in MSF settings differ from those in higher-income countries. Further investigation is needed for adequate emergency obstetric care coverage.

Pregnancy outcome and predictive factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes of cephalopelvic disproportion pregnancies in a resource-limited setting with an efficient referral system.

OBJECTIVE: Small local hospitals with inexperiencedpersonnel often have adverse incidence that could be prevented. A good referral system could reduce this unnecessary death rate. The present study was conducted to determine the pregnancy outcomes of cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD) cases that were referred for cesarean section at a tertiary center and presented the predictivefactorsfor adverse pregnancy outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A retrospective study that descriptively presented the adverse pregnancy outcome in referred CPD pregnancies and analyzed for predictive factor of overall adverse pregnancy outcome. RESULTS: One hundred ninety five referred CPD pregnancies were included in this study. The mean duration ± SD from CPD diagnosis to childbirth was 232.32±103.75 minutes. Pregnancy additional complication was found in 42/195 (21.5%) cases, but there were no maternal or neonatal mortalities. The NICU admission and postpartum hemorrhage rates were 21.5% and 12.3%, respectively. Obesity BMI was associated with an increased risk of overall adverse maternal outcomes (OR 3.12). Previously complicated pregnancy and cervical dilatation at CPD diagnosis were significant predictors for overall neonatal adverse outcomes. The highest risk wasforpregnant women who were cesarean delivered at 10 cm cervical dilatation (OR 2.84 vs. cervical dilatation ≤5 cm, p-value 0.002). CONCLUSION: A referral system is one of the modalities to avoid maternal and neonatal mortality for CPD pregnant women in a resource-limited setting. We suggest that early referral before advanced progression of cervical dilatation, especially in obese pregnant women and in complicated pregnancies, may improve the pregnancy outcomes.

Obstetric complications, neonatal morbidity, and indications for cesarean delivery by maternal age.

OBJECTIVE: To delineate adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes as well as indications for cesarean delivery by maternal age in a contemporaneous large national cohort. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of electronic medical records from 12 centers and 203,517 (30,673 women aged 35 years or older) women with singleton gestations stratified by maternal age. Logistic regression was performed to investigate maternal and neonatal outcomes for each maternal age strata (referent group, age 25.0-29.9 years), adjusting for race, parity, body mass index, insurance, pre-existing medical conditions, substance and tobacco use, and site. Documented indications for cesarean delivery were analyzed. RESULTS: Neonates born to women aged 25.0-29.9 years had the lowest risk of birth weight less than 2,500 g (7.2%; P<.001), admission to neonatal intensive care unit (11.5%; P<.001), and perinatal mortality (0.7%; P<.001). Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were higher in women aged 35 years or older (cumulative rate 8.5% compared with 7.8%; 25.0-29.9 years; P<.001). Previous uterine scar was the leading indication for cesarean delivery in women aged 25.0 years or older (36.9%; P<.001). For younger women, failure to progress or cephalopelvic disproportion (37.0% for those younger than age 20.0 years and 31.1% for those aged 20.0-24.9-years; P<.001) and nonreassuring fetal heart tracing (28.7% for those younger than 20.0 years and 21.2% for those aged 20.0-24.9-years; P<.001) predominated as indications. Truly elective cesarean delivery rate was 20.2% for women aged 45.0 years or older (adjusted odds ratio 1.85 [99% confidence interval 1.03-3.32] compared with the referent age group of 25.0-29.9 years). CONCLUSIONS: Maternal and obstetric complications differed by maternal age, as did rates of elective cesarean delivery. Women aged 25.0-29.9 years had the lowest rate of serious neonatal morbidity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: : II.

Maternal and perinatal outcomes among nulliparous adolescents in low- and middle-income countries: a multi-country study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes and caesarean section among adolescents in low- and middle-income countries. DESIGN: Secondary analysis using facility-based cross-sectional data from the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. SETTING: Twenty-three countries in Africa, Latin America, and Asia. POPULATION: Women admitted for delivery in 363 health facilities during 2-3 months between 2004 and 2008. METHODS: We constructed multilevel logistic regression models to estimate the effect of young maternal age on risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes among young mothers. RESULTS: A total of 78 646 nulliparous mothers aged ≤24 years and their singleton infants were included in the analysis. Compared with mothers aged 20-24 years, adolescents aged 16-19 years had a significantly lower risk of caesarean section (adjusted OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.71-0.79). When the analysis was restricted to caesarean section indicated for presumed cephalopelvic disproportion, the risk of caesarean section was significantly higher among mothers aged ≤15 years (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.07-1.49) than among those aged 20-24 years. Higher risks of low birthweight and preterm birth were found among adolescents aged 16-19 years (aOR 1.10, 95% CI 1.03-1.17; aOR 1.16, 95% CI 1.09-1.23, respectively) and ≤15 years (aOR 1.33, 95% CI 1.14-1.54; aOR 1.56, 95% CI 1.35-1.80, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Adolescent girls experiencing pregnancy at a very young age (i.e. <16 years) have an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

ANAESTHETIC CHALLENGES IN A HIGH RISK PARTURIENT WITH MYASTHENIA GRAVIS UNDERGOING CAESAREAN SECTION UNDER SPINAL ANAESTHESIA.

The prevalence of myasthenia gravis is low. The management implications of this disease in pregnant women are very challenging for anaesthetists. The objective is to highlight some of the challenges, the management and the lessons learnt during the management of this patient. This is a case report of a 31-year old parturient with diagnosed myasthenia gravis co-existing with hepatitis B infection that presented for caesarean section. Surgery was carried out under a single-shot spinal anaesthesia with bupivacaine. Intraoperative myasthenia crisis was managed with neostigmine infusion. She was managed in the Intensive Care Unit for a few days and discharged. Under spinal anaesthesia, she became very breathless and developed wide-spread musculo-skeletal weakness while having a stable haemodynamics intra-operatively. Surgery was carried out successfully. Both mother and child were discharged on the 71th day post-operative after baby was confirmed sero-negative of hepatitis B surface antigen. A better understanding of the pathophysiology and complications that accompany myasthenia gravis is needed to manage these patients under anaesthesia.

Rise in cesarean section rate over a 20-year period in a public sector hospital in northern Thailand.

OBJECTIVE: To determine a trend of cesarean section rate (CSR) and main contributing factors in a public sector hospital, representing northern part of Thailand. METHODS: A retrospective descriptive analysis was conducted by assessing the database of maternal-fetal medicine unit, which had prospectively been collected for 20 years. Trends were evaluated using data for the years 1992-2011. Private sector patients were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 50,872 public sector patients were available for analysis. The number of deliveries was gradually decreased from 3,802 in 1992 to 1,748 in 2011. Of them, 7,480 underwent cesarean section, CSR of 14.7 %. However, the CSR was significantly increased from 11.3 % in 1992 to 23.6 % in 2011 (p value <0.001). The CSRs indicated by cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD) and previous CSs were mainly responsible for a marked increase over the study period. CSR due to CPD was increased from 3.2 % in 1992 to 7.9 % in 2011 (p value <0.0001). While CSR due to other indications either breech presentation, fetal distress and twin pregnancies were only slightly, but significantly increased in the last decades but they are relatively constant in the recent years. CONCLUSIONS: In our public sector, CSR has gradually increased. The main reasons of such an increase were likely to be associated with over-diagnosis of CPD and subsequent repeated CS, while other indications played only a minimal role. To achieve the appropriate CSR, audit system for diagnosis of CPD must be instituted.

Abdominal disimpaction with lower uterine segment support as a novel technique to minimize fetal and maternal morbidities during cesarean section for obstructed labor: a case series.

Cesarean section for obstructed labor remains a difficult procedure that may be associated with serious fetal and maternal injuries. In this case series, we evaluated the use of abdominal disimpaction with lower segment support as a novel technique to minimize morbidities. Eight patients who underwent cesarean section for obstructed labor were recruited. Impacted fetal head was delivered using this technique and uterine extensions, bladder injury, vaginal injury, and intraoperative bleeding were reported. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were observed postoperatively. No major morbidities were reported. Accordingly, we consider this technique as a promising step to minimize complications during cesarean section for obstructed labor.

Symphysiotomy for feto-pelvic disproportion.

BACKGROUND: Symphysiotomy is an operation in which the fibres of the pubic symphysis are partially divided to allow separation of the joint and thus enlargement of the pelvic dimensions during childbirth. It is performed with local analgesia and does not require an operating theatre nor advanced surgical skills. It may be a lifesaving procedure for the mother or the baby, or both, in several clinical situations. These include: failure to progress in labour when caesarean section is unavailable, unsafe or declined by the mother; and obstructed birth of the aftercoming head of a breech presenting baby. Criticism of the operation because of complications, particularly pelvic instability, and as being a 'second best' option has resulted in its decline or disappearance from use in many countries. Several large observational studies have reported high rates of success, low rates of complications and very low mortality rates. OBJECTIVES: To determine, from the best available evidence, the effectiveness and safety of symphysiotomy versus alternative options for obstructed labour in various clinical situations. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (7 July 2012). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized trials comparing symphysiotomy with alternative management, or alternative techniques of symphysiotomy, for obstructed labour or obstructed aftercoming head during breech birth. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Planned methods included evaluation of studies against objective quality criteria for inclusion, extraction of data, and analysis of data using risk ratios or mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. The primary outcomes were maternal death or severe morbidity, and perinatal death or severe morbidity. MAIN RESULTS: We found no randomized trials of symphysiotomy. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Because of controversy surrounding the use of symphysiotomy, and the possibility that it may be a life-saving procedure in certain circumstances, professional and global bodies should provide guidelines for the use (or non-use) of symphysiotomy based on the best available evidence (currently evidence from observational studies). Research is needed to provide robust evidence of the effectiveness and safety of symphysiotomy compared with no symphysiotomy or comparisons of alternative symphysiotomy techniques in clinical situations in which caesarean section is not available; and compared with caesarean section in clinical situations in which the relative risks and benefits are uncertain (for example in women at very high risk of complications from caesarean section).

Obstructed labour in resource-poor settings: the need for revival of symphysiotomy in Nigeria.

Symphysiotomy is an operation in which the fibres of the pubic symphysis are partially divided to allow separation of the joint and thus enlargement of the pelvic dimensions thereby facilitating vaginal delivery of the foetus in the presence of mild to moderate cephalopelvic disproportion. It is performed with local anaesthesia, does not require an operating theatre or advanced surgical skills. It can be a lifesaving procedure for both mother and baby in obstructed labour, especially in rural areas and resource-poor settings of developing countries, where a 24 hours availability of a caesarean section cannot be guaranteed. It is a simple underused technology that can be performed by a graduate doctor or midwife in rural health facilities and hospitals where most of the times, in Nigeria, there are no practicing specialist obstetricians. In rural hospital and in communities where sympysiotomy is still being performed, it is evident that it is preferred to caesarean section because of the socio-cultural desire to achieve a vaginal delivery. This paper highlights our experiences with symphysiotomy in a rural Roman Catholic hospital providing evidence on the safety of symphysiotomy and the need for its revival and reinstatement in the obstetric arsenal in Nigeria and similar countries in sub-Saharan Africa where maternal mortality as a result of prolonged and neglected obstructed labour still occur.

[Cesarean birth: justifying indication or justified concern?]. / Operación cesárea: Indicación justificante o preocupación justificada?

BACKGROUND: Caesarean section is the most common surgery performed in all hospitals of second level of care in the health sector and more frequently in private hospitals in Mexico. OBJECTIVE: To determine the behavior that caesarean section in different hospitals in the health sector in the city of Aguascalientes and analyze the indications during the same period. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A descriptive and cross in the top four secondary hospitals in the health sector of the state of Aguascalientes, which together account for 81% of obstetric care in the state, from 1 September to 31 October 2008. Were analyzed: indication of cesarean section and their classification, previous pregnancies, marital status, gestational age, weight and minute Apgar newborn and given birth control during the event. RESULTS: were recorded during the study period, 2.964 pregnancies after 29 weeks, of whom 1.195 were resolved by Caesarean section with an overall rate of 40.3%. We found 45 different indications, which undoubtedly reflect the great diversity of views on the institutional medical staff to schedule a cesarean section. CONCLUSIONS: Although each institution has different resources and a population with different characteristics, treatment protocols should be developed by staff of each hospital to have the test as a cornerstone of labor, also request a second opinion before a caesarean section, all try to reduce the frequency of cesarean section.

Symphysiotomy- a dying art: the experience at Federal Medical Centre Umuahia Nigeria.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To review the indications, outcome and complications of symphysiotomy done in Federal Medical Centre Umuahia during the study period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study is a 5-year review of all women who had symphysiotomy at Federal Medical Centre Umuahia. The total number of the procedure performed, and all the deliveries conducted at the hospital in the study period were obtained from the labour ward register. The case notes of the patients were then retrieved and their biodata and other relevant information were obtained and summarized in frequency tables and percentages. RESULTS: Ten (10) symphysiotomies were performed among 3702 deliveries conducted during the period under review giving a rate of 0.27%. Seventy per cent of the patients were aged 30 years and below, mean age was 26 (± SD4.9) years. Most of the patients were multiparous women, only one was grandmultiparous. All were for mild to moderate cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD). In one particular case, the patient also presented with retained second twin. They were all unbooked patients. Main complication was pelvic and leg pain but there were two cases of vesicovaginal fistula which may be a complication of obstructed labour since leakage of urine did not start immediately after the procedure. The birth weight of the babies ranged from 3kg to 4.2kg. There was no maternal mortality but two fresh stillbirths were recorded giving a perinatal mortality rate of 200 per 1000 total births. CONCLUSION: Symphysiotomy if done by a trained person, in well selected patients is still safe and can be life saving in environments where caesarean delivery is not well accepted and late presentation is common.

Vaginal birth after cesarean for cephalopelvic disproportion: effect of birth weight difference on success.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of birth weight difference between the current and index pregnancy on vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) failure in patients whose prior cesarean was for cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of women with one cesarean for CPD, comparing the rate of VBAC failure in women whose infant was smaller, the same, or larger in the VBAC attempt compared with cesarean. The primary outcome was VBAC attempt failure, defined as a patient who attempted VBAC but subsequently required a cesarean delivery for any indication. Univariable, stratified, and multivariable analyses were used. RESULTS: Of 13,706 patients attempting VBAC, 1,511 had one prior cesarean delivery for CPD. Compared with patients with the same birth weight, a lower birth weight was associated with fewer failed VBAC attempts (29.6% compared with 37.8%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5-1.0) and a higher birth weight was associated with more failed VBAC attempts (54.5% compared with 37.8%, adjusted OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.5-2.8). CONCLUSION: Birth weight difference has a moderate effect on the rate of VBAC success in patients whose prior cesarean delivery was for CPD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Anesthesia for cesarian section in pregnant woman with acute intermittent porphyria and hypothyroidism--case report.

Acute intermittent porphyria (AIP) is a rare autosomal dominant metabolic disorder' affecting the production of heme, the oxygen-binding prosthetic group of hemoglobin. It is characterized by a deficiency of the enzyme hydroxymethylbilane synthase; without this cytoplasmic enzyme, heme synthesis cannot finish, and the metabolite porphobilinogen accumulates in the cytoplasm. Some additional factors must also be present such as drugs, hormones, dietary changes, infections diseases and surgery that trigger the appearance of symptoms, which include neurological disorders, abdominal pain, constipation, and muscle weakness. We present a perioperative course of a pregnant woman with porphyria in association with hypothyroidism and its anesthetic management.

Symphysiotomy for feto-pelvic disproportion.

BACKGROUND: Symphysiotomy is an operation in which the fibres of the pubic symphysis are partially divided to allow separation of the joint and thus enlargement of the pelvic dimensions during childbirth. It is performed with local analgesia and does not require an operating theatre nor advanced surgical skills. It may be a lifesaving procedure for the mother or the baby, or both, in several clinical situations. These include: failure to progress in labour when caesarean section is unavailable, unsafe or declined by the mother; and obstructed birth of the aftercoming head of a breech presenting baby. Criticism of the operation because of complications, particularly pelvic instability, and as being a 'second best' option has resulted in its decline or disappearance from use in many countries. Several large observational studies have reported high rates of success, low rates of complications and very low mortality rates. OBJECTIVES: To determine, from the best available evidence, the effectiveness and safety of symphysiotomy versus alternative options for obstructed labour in various clinical situations. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 August 2010), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 3) and PubMed (1966 to 31 August 2010). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized trials comparing symphysiotomy with alternative management, or alternative techniques of symphysiotomy, for obstructed labour or obstructed aftercoming head during breech birth. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Planned methods included evaluation of studies against objective quality criteria for inclusion, extraction of data, and analysis of data using risk ratios or mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. The primary outcomes were maternal death or severe morbidity, and perinatal death or severe morbidity. MAIN RESULTS: We found no randomized trials of symphysiotomy. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Because of controversy surrounding the use of symphysiotomy, and the possibility that it may be a life-saving procedure in certain circumstances, professional and global bodies should provide guidelines for the use (or non-use) of symphysiotomy based on the best available evidence (currently evidence from observational studies). Research is needed to provide robust evidence of the effectiveness and safety of symphysiotomy compared with no symphysiotomy or comparisons of alternative symphysiotomy techniques in clinical situations in which caesarean section is not available; and compared with caesarean section in clinical situations in which the relative risks and benefits are uncertain (for example in women at very high risk of complications from caesarean section).

Indicações de cesariana baseadas em evidências: parte I / Evidence-based cesarean section indications: part I

No Brasil, as taxas de cesárea variam bastante entre as regiões, principalmente quando se compara a assistência realizada pelo Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) com a assistência privada. A taxa de cesarianas no setor de saúde suplementar chega próximo de 80%, enquanto no SUS fica próxima de 30%, muito acima do recomendado pela Organização Mundial de Saude (OMS). Realizou-se uma revisão da literatura em busca das melhores evidências disponíveis sobre indicações de cesariana. Analisaram-se as principais indicações de cesárea, como distocia ou falha na progressão do parto, desproporção cefalopélvica, má posição fetal nas variedades de posição posteriores e transversas persistentes, apresentação pélvica, de face e córmica, cesárea anterior, frequência cardíaca fetal não-tranquilizadora, presença de mecônio e centralização fetal. Em nenhuma dessas situações existe indicação absoluta de cesariana, uma vez que mesmo na apresentação córmica o parto normal pode ser tentado, mediante versão cefálica externa (VCE). Nas distocias de progressão, o parto normal pode ser alcançado mediante correção da contratilidade uterina, porém a cesariana encontra-se indicada quando a desproporção cefalopélvica é diagnosticada pelo uso judicioso do partograma. A apresentação pélvica também pode ser corrigida com VCE a termo, mas a via de parto deve ser discutida com a gestante quando a VCE falha ou não é realizada. Embora os riscos relativos neonatais sejam maiores para o parto vaginal, os riscos absolutos são baixos, e a opinião da gestante deve ser considerada

Rates of cesarean in Brazil vary widely among the regions, especially when Single Health System (SUS, acronym in Portuguese) assistance is compared with private clinics. In the supplementary health system the rates of cesarean section are around 80% and in SUS are about 30%, above the rates recommended by World Health Organization (WHO). A literature review was performed searching the best evaluable evidences. The main indications for cesarean section were considered such as dystocia or failure to progress, cephalopelvic disproportion, abnormal fetal positioning in occiput posterior and transverse presentations, breech, face and transverse lie, previous cesarean section, non-reassuring fetal heart rate, meconium and brain-sparing effect. Most of these situations do not represent absolute indications for cesarean section. Even in transverse lie an external cephalic version (ECV) could be tried and a trial of labor can be conducted. When a progress failure occurs, vaginal delivery can be achieved using measures as correction of contractility disorders, although cesarean should be indicated when cephalopelvic disproportion is diagnosed using correctly the partograma. Breech presentation can also be corrected with an ECV at term but the mode of delivery has to be discussed with the patient when ECV fails or it is not performed. Although neonatal relative risks are higher with vaginal delivery, absolute risks are small, and the pregnant women opinion has to be considered