Human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes: Cardiovascular properties and metabolism and pharmacokinetics of deuterated mexiletine analogs.

Prolongation of the cardiac action potential (AP) and early after depolarizations (EADs) are electrical anomalies of cardiomyocytes that can lead to lethal arrhythmias and are potential liabilities for existing drugs and drug candidates in development. For example, long QT syndrome-3 (LQTS3) is caused by mutations in the Nav 1.5 sodium channel that debilitate channel inactivation and cause arrhythmias. We tested the hypothesis that a useful drug (i.e., mexiletine) with potential liabilities (i.e., potassium channel inhibition and adverse reactions) could be re-engineered by dynamic medicinal chemistry to afford a new drug candidate with greater efficacy and less toxicity. Human cardiomyocytes were generated from LQTS3 patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (hIPSCs) and normal hIPSCs to determine beneficial (on-target) and detrimental effects (off-target) of mexiletine and synthetic analogs, respectively. The approach combined "drug discovery" and "hit to lead" refinement and showed that iterations of medicinal chemistry and physiological testing afforded optimized compound 22. Compared to mexiletine, compound 22 showed a 1.85-fold greater AUC and no detectable CNS toxicity at 100 mg/kg. In vitro hepatic metabolism studies showed that 22 was metabolized via cytochrome P-450, as previously shown, and by the flavin-containing monooxygenase (FMO). Deuterated-22 showed decreased metabolism and showed acceptable cardiovascular and physicochemical properties.

Sacubitril/Valsartan and Mexiletine: A Proarrhythmic Combination?

The uptake of sacubitril/valsartan since the PARADIGM study confirmed its beneficial effects on outcomes over enalapril in chronic systolic heart failure has inevitably led to potential interactions with co-prescribed medications in real-world patients. We report two cases that raise the possibility of an interaction between sacubitril/valsartan and the class Ib anti-arrhythmic mexiletine resulting in proarrhythmic effects. We discuss the pharmacokinetics of both agents and posit potential mechanistic interactions that suggest caution should be used and careful monitoring for (ventricular) arrhythmias applied in patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan and mexiletine.

Bioorthogonal Removal of 3-Isocyanopropyl Groups Enables the Controlled Release of Fluorophores and Drugs in Vivo.

Dissociative bioorthogonal reactions allow for chemically controlling the release of bioactive agents and reporter probes. Here we describe 3-isocyanopropyl substituents as masking groups that can be effectively removed in biological systems. 3-Isocyanopropyl derivatives react with tetrazines to afford 3-oxopropyl groups that eliminate diverse functionalities. The study shows that the reaction is rapid and can liberate phenols and amines near-quantitatively under physiological conditions. The reaction is compatible with living organisms as demonstrated by the release of a resorufin fluorophore and a mexiletine drug in zebrafish embryos implanted with tetrazine-modified beads. The combined benefits of synthetic ease, rapid kinetics, diversity of leaving groups, high release yields, and structural compactness, make 3-isocyanopropyl derivatives attractive chemical caging moieties for uses in chemical biology and drug delivery.

A randomized trial of mexiletine in ALS: Safety and effects on muscle cramps and progression.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and tolerability of mexiletine in a phase II double-blind randomized controlled trial of sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (SALS). METHODS: Sixty participants with SALS from 10 centers were randomized 1:1:1 to placebo, mexiletine 300 mg/d, or mexiletine 900 mg/d and followed for 12 weeks. The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints were pharmacokinetic study from plasma and CSF, ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) score, slow vital capacity (SVC), and muscle cramp frequency and severity. RESULTS: The only serious adverse event among active arm participants was one episode of imbalance. Thirty-two percent of participants receiving 900 mg of mexiletine discontinued study drug vs 5% on placebo (p = 0.026). Pharmacokinetic study demonstrated a peak plasma concentration 2 hours postdose and strong correlation between plasma and CSF (p < 0.001). Rates of decline of ALSFRS-R and SVC did not differ from placebo. Analysis of all randomized patients demonstrated significant reductions of muscle cramp frequency (300 mg: rate = 31% of placebo, p = 0.047; 900 mg: 16% of placebo, p = 0.002) and cramp intensity (300 mg: mean = 45% of placebo, p = 0.08; 900 mg: 25% of placebo, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Mexiletine was safe at both doses and well-tolerated at 300 mg/d but adverse effects at 900 mg/d led to a high rate of discontinuation. Mexiletine treatment resulted in large dose-dependent reductions in muscle cramp frequency and severity. No effect on rate of progression was detected, but clinically important differences could not be excluded in this small and short-duration study. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that mexiletine is safe when given daily to patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis at 300 and 900 mg and well-tolerated at the lower dose.

Mexiletine and its Interactions with Classical Antiepileptic Drugs: An Isobolographic Analysis.

Using the mouse maximal electroshock test, the reference model of tonic-clonic seizures, the aim of the present study was to determine the type of interaction between mexiletine (a class IB antiarrhythmic drug) and classical antiepileptics: valproate, carbamazepine, phenytoin, and phenobarbital. Isobolographic analysis of obtained data indicated antagonistic interactions between mexiletine and valproate (for fixed ratio combinations of 1:1 and 3:1). Additivity was observed between mexiletine and valproate applied in proportion of 1:3 as well as between mexiletine and remaining antiepileptics for the fixed ratios of 1:3, 1:1, and 3:1. Neither motor performance nor long-term memory were impaired by mexiletine or antiepileptic drugs regardless of whether they were administered singly or in combination. Mexiletine did not significantly affected brain concentrations of carbamazepine, phenobarbital or phenytoin. In contrast, the antiarrhythmic drug decreased by 23 % the brain level of valproate. This could be, at least partially, the reason of antagonistic interaction between the two drugs. In conclusion, the observed additivity suggests that mexiletine can be safely applied in epileptic patients treated with carbamazepine, phenytoin or phenobarbital. Because of undesirable pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetic interactions with valproate, mexiletine should not be used in such combinations.

Late sodium current block for drug-induced long QT syndrome: Results from a prospective clinical trial.

Drug-induced long QT syndrome has resulted in many drugs being withdrawn from the market. At the same time, the current regulatory paradigm for screening new drugs causing long QT syndrome is preventing drugs from reaching the market, sometimes inappropriately. In this study, we report the results of a first-of-a-kind clinical trial studying late sodium (mexiletine and lidocaine) and calcium (diltiazem) current blocking drugs to counteract the effects of hERG potassium channel blocking drugs (dofetilide and moxifloxacin). We demonstrate that both mexiletine and lidocaine substantially reduce heart-rate corrected QT (QTc) prolongation from dofetilide by 20 ms. Furthermore, all QTc shortening occurs in the heart-rate corrected J-Tpeak (J-Tpeak c) interval, the biomarker we identified as a sign of late sodium current block. This clinical trial demonstrates that late sodium blocking drugs can substantially reduce QTc prolongation from hERG potassium channel block and assessment of J-Tpeak c may add value beyond only assessing QTc.

Influence of experimental diabetes and insulin treatment on the enantioselective pharmacokinetics of mexiletine and its metabolites.

This study evaluates the influence of streptozotocin-induced diabetes on the kinetic disposition and metabolism of mexiletine (MEX) enantiomers in rats. Animals in the control (n = 6 for each blood collection time), diabetic (single intravenous dosage of 45 mg·(kg body mass)(-1) of streptozotocin), and insulin-treated groups (diabetic rats treated daily with 2 IU insulin) received by gavage a single dose of 10 mg·(kg body mass)(-1) racemic MEX. MEX enantiomers and the metabolites hydroxymethylmexiletine (HMM) and p-hydroxymexiletine PHM) were analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Statistical analysis was based on a serial sacrifice design, and parameter estimation was performed using a Bayesian modeling procedure. Area under the curve (AUC) for the (-)-(R) enantiomers of MEX, HMM, and PHM did not differ between the control and diabetic groups. However, AUC for (+)-(S)-MEX and (+)-(S)-HMM were lower in the diabetic than in the control group. Insulin treatment recovered glucose levels to normal and the (+)-(S)-MEX AUC and (+)-(S)-HMM AUC became similar to the AUCs observed in the nondiabetic animals.

Capillary zone electrophoresis for separation and quantitative determination of mexiletine and its main phase I metabolites.

The simultaneous separation and quantification of the analytes within the minimum analysis time and the maximum resolution and efficiency are the main objectives in the development of a capillary electrophoretic method for the determination of solutes. In this paper we describe a specific, sensitive and robust method, using capillary zone electrophoresis with internal standard and UV detection, for the separation and quantification of the anti-arrhythmic drug mexiletine, its main phase I metabolites, and its main nitrogenous degradation product.

Pharmacokinetic study of three cardiovascular drugs by high-performance liquid chromatography using pre-column derivatization with 9,10-anthraquinone-2-sulfonyl chloride.

A new method was developed to analyze three cardiovascular drugs in rat plasma, Mexiletine hydrochloride (MXL), Methoxamine hydrochloride (MTX), and Metaraminol bitartrate (MTR), by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using 9,10-anthraquinone-2-sulfonyl chloride (ASC) as the derivatization reagent. The derivatization modes and conditions for this method were optimized. The quantitative analysis was achieved using a C18 column at room temperature (25 degrees C), with various volume ratios of methanol-water as the mobile phase and a detection wavelength at 256 nm. Analytical linearity was obtained for the method over the concentration range of 0.04-8.0 microg mL(-1) for all the three drugs. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 0.04 microg mL(-1). This method was successfully applied to the analysis of the three drugs in rat plasma and their pharmacokinetic studies. The t1/2 values of the three drugs in rats were found to be 5.38+/-0.61, 4.49+/-0.53, and 3.70+/-0.19 h for MXL, MTX, and MTR, respectively.

A common SCN5A variant alters the responsiveness of human sodium channels to class I antiarrhythmic agents.

BACKGROUND: The potential pathophysiological role of common SCN5A polymorphisms in cardiac arrhythmias has been increasingly recognized. However, little is known about the impact of those polymorphisms on the pharmocological response of hNav1.5 to various antiarrhythmic agents. METHODS AND RESULTS: The known SCN5A polymorphism, S524Y, was studied in comparison with the wild type (WT) in [corrected] the SCN5A-Q1077del variant. The ion channel gating kinetics and pharmacology were evaluated using whole-cell patch-clamp methods in HEK-293 cells. Consistent with a previous report, the basal ion channel gating kinetics of S524Y were indistinguishable from the WT. Quinidine (20 microM) caused similar extent of tonic block reduction of sodium currents at -120 mV in WT and S524Y. Surprisingly, quinidine (20 microM) exerted a more use-dependent block by a 10 Hz pulse train in S524Y than in WT at 22 degrees C (Ki: WT, 51.3 microM; S524Y, 20.3 microM). S524Y significantly delayed recovery from the use-dependent block, compared with the WT (tau= 88.6 +/- 7.9 s vs 41.9 +/- 6.6 s, P < 0.005). Under more physiological conditions using a 2 Hz pulse train at 37 degrees C, S524Y similarly enhanced the use-dependent block by quinidine. In addition, S524Y enhanced the use-dependent block by flecainide (12.5 microM), but not by mexiletine (100 microM). CONCLUSION: A common SCN5A polymorphism, S524Y, can enhance a use-dependent block by class Ia and Ic antiarrhythmic agents. Our findings may have clinical implications in pharmacological management of cardiac arrhythmias since this common SCN5A polymorphism might be a contributing factor to the variable antiarrhythmic response.

Effect of congestive heart failure on mexiletine pharmacokinetics in a Japanese population.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the influence of congestive heart failure (CHF) on the clearance of mexiletine. METHODS: The mexiletine clearance/bioavailability (CL/F) ratio was estimated in 584 inpatients receiving mexiletine therapy. The study population consisted of 210 patients with CHF [CHF group; 116 inpatients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I-II (group NYHA I-II) CHF and 94 inpatients with NYHA class III-IV (group NYHA III-IV) CHF] and 374 inpatients without CHF (Non-CHF group). Serum levels of mexiletine were determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). RESULTS: Mexiletine clearance was significantly lower in the CHF group when compared with the Non-CHF group (0.264+/-0.093 vs. 0.393+/-0.082 l/h/kg, mean+/-S.D., p<0.05). Further, the CL/F ratio was 50% lower in group NYHA III-IV when compared with the Non-CHF group, and the CL/F ratio tended to change in inverse proportion to NYHA class. CONCLUSION: CHF status significantly affects mexiletine clearance. Therefore, dose adjustments and careful monitoring are likely required in CHF patients receiving mexiletine.

Inhibitory effects of psychotropic drugs on mexiletine metabolism in human liver microsomes: prediction of in vivo drug interactions.

Mexiletine, an anti-arrhythmic agent, is used for the control of ventricular arrhythmias and for neuropathic pain from cancer or diabetes mellitus. It is sometimes used together with psychotropic drugs in patients with depression, schizophrenia or sleep disorder. It is metabolized mainly by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2 D 6 and, to a minor extent, by CYP1A2. To predict possible drug interactions between mexiletine and psychotropic drugs, the inhibitory effects of 14 psychotropic drugs (phenytoin, carbamazepine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, fluoxetine, citalopram, sertraline, imipramine, desipramine, haloperidol, thioridazine, olanzapine, etizolam, and quazepam) on mexiletine metabolism in human liver microsomes were determined. Fluoxetine (Ki=0.6+/- 0.1 microM), sertraline (Ki=7.6+/- 0.8 microM) and desipramine (Ki=3.2+/- 0.5 microM) competitively inhibited the mexiletine p-hydroxylation in human liver microsomes. Thioridazine (Kis=0.5+/- 0.2 microM; Kii =3.6+/-1.6 microM) and paroxetine (Kis=1.7+/- 0.7 microM; Kii=3.6+/- 0.9 microM) exhibited a mixed-type inhibition (competitive and non-competitive) toward mexiletine p-hydroxylation in human liver microsomes. The changes of the in vivo clearance of mexiletine by the psychotropic drugs were predicted by 1+(I/Ki) using the in vitro Ki and unbound inhibitor concentrations in liver. The values were calculated as 2.4 for paroxetine, 5.5 for fluoxetine, 1.1 for sertraline, 2.8 for desipramine and 2.2 for thioridazine. In addition, paroxetine exhibited a mechanism-based inactivation with Ki=0.7 microM and Kinact=0.15 min(-1). The present study predicted the possibility of drug interactions between mexiletine and paroxetine, fluoxetine, desipramine, and thioridazine in clinical use.

Effects of ciprofloxacin on the stereoselective disposition of mexiletine in man.

Mexiletine is extensively metabolized in man, with less than 10% of the dose being excreted unchanged in urine. Clinical drug-drug interaction studies as well as in vitro drug metabolism studies suggest that CYP1A2, in addition to CYP2D6, is involved in the metabolism of mexiletine in man. Therefore, the objective of the study was to determine whether potential inhibition of CYP1A2 by the quinolone antibiotic agent ciprofloxacin would alter the stereoselective disposition of mexiletine. Nineteen healthy men (10 smokers and 9 nonsmokers) received a single 200-mg oral dose of racemic mexiletine hydrochloride on 2 occasions: once alone and once during concomitant administration of ciprofloxacin 750 mg BID (starting 3 days before and up to 2 days after the administration of mexiletine). Serial blood and urine samples were collected for 48 hours, and pharmacokinetic parameters were derived. Total clearances of R-(-)- and S-(+)-mexiletine were 42% and 63% higher in smokers compared with nonsmokers (P < 0.05). This observation is in agreement with increased clearance of mexiletine under conditions of increased CYP1A2 activity. On the other hand, ciprofloxacin administration only marginally decreased R-(-)- and S-(+)-mexiletine clearances (2 to 5 L/h; P < 0.05) secondary to a decrease in mexiletine nonrenal clearance. In conclusion, the increase in mexiletine nonrenal clearance in smokers and its decrease during the combined administration of ciprofloxacin confirm the role of CYP1A2 in the overall clearance of the drug. Nevertheless, results obtained in this study suggest that no major drug interaction is to be expected during the concomitant administration of ciprofloxacin and mexiletine in patients.

Impact of CYP2D6*10 on mexiletine pharmacokinetics in healthy adult volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: In vitro studies with human liver microsomes have suggested that the oxidative conversion of mexiletine (MX) to its metabolites is catalyzed by CYP2D6 and is significantly impaired in microsomes with the CYP2D6*10/*10 genotype. Therefore, we examined the influence of the CYP2D6*10 allele on MX pharmacokinetics in Japanese subjects. METHODS: Subjects with CYP2D6*1/*1 (group *1/*1; n=5), CYP2D6*10/*10 (group *10/*10; n=6) and CYP2D6*5/*10 (group *5/*10; n=4) genotypes received a single 200-mg dose of MX. Plasma and urinary levels of MX and its metabolites ( p-hydroxymexiletine (PHM), hydroxymethylmexiletine (HMM) and N-hydroxymexiletine (NHM)) were determined by means of high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Mean area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and t(1/2) of MX were significantly ( P<0.05) higher in the CYP2D6*10/*5 group (AUC 11.23+/-3.05 micro g.h/ml; t(1/2) 15.5+/-3.2 h) than in the CYP2D6*1/*1 (AUC 5.53+/-1.01 micro g.h/ml; t(1/2) 8.1+/-1.6 h) and CYP2D6*10/*10 (AUC 7.32+/-2.36 micro g.h/ml; t(1/2) 10.8+/-2.8 h) groups, but there was no significant difference between the CYP2D6*1/*1 and CYP2D6*10/*10 groups. The maximum plasma concentration of MX was not significantly different among the three groups. The values of urinary excretion of PHM and HMM in the CYP2D6*1/*1 group were significantly ( P<0.05) higher than those in the CYP2D6*10/*10 and CYP2D6*5/*10 groups, but there was no significant difference in that of NHM among the three groups. Clearance of MX in the CYP2D6*5/*10 subjects was comparable to that in the poor metabolizers described previously. CONCLUSION: The present findings demonstrated that carriers of the CYP2D6*10 allele showed a decreased clearance of MX. Subjects with CYP2D6*5/ *10 showed significantly ( P<0.05) increased plasma levels of MX, and homozygotes for CYP2D6*10 also showed an increase, although to a lesser extent. Thus, the CYP2D6*10 allele plays an important role in MX pharmacokinetics.

[HPLC-fluorescent spectrometric determination of serum mexiletine concentration after derivatization with fluram].

AIM: To establish an HPLC-fluorescent spectrometric method for the determination of mexiletine hydrochloride in plasma after derivatization with fluram. METHODS: Fluram acetone solution was added to the deproteinized plasma with acetone to obtain the derivative of mexiletine. The HPLC method was performed on a column of Allitima C18 (150 mm x 4.6 mm, 5 microns) with the mobile phase of methanol-water-diethylamine-phosphoric acid buffer (2.4 mol.L-1, pH 4.0) (70:28:2), and the detective wavelength were set at Ex 392 nm and Em 480 nm. RESULTS: Mexiletine has a liner range over the concentration range from 0.100-6.400 mg.L-1. The lowest detectable concentration of this method was 5 micrograms.L-1 (S/N > or = 4). The intra-day and inter-day RSDs were 1.34%-5.31%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This method is simple, selective and can be used for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and pharmacokinetic studies of mexiletine.

Possible mechanism for pharmacokinetic interaction between lidocaine and mexiletine.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to elucidate the mechanism of pharmacokinetic interaction between lidocaine and mexiletine, because an unexpected increase in plasma lidocaine concentration accompanied by severe side effects was observed when mexiletine was administered to a patient with dilated cardiomyopathy. METHODS: Plasma concentrations of lidocaine, its major metabolites, and mexiletine were measured in a patient with dilated cardiomyopathy. The lidocaine-mexiletine interaction was evaluated by examination of the effects of mexiletine on plasma concentration and the tissue distribution of lidocaine in rabbits in vivo, as well as on the in vitro lidocaine binding to phosphatidylserine, a binding constituent for weakly basic drugs. RESULTS: Plasma lidocaine concentrations increased significantly when the oral dose of mexiletine was increased. This pharmacokinetic interaction was not attributable to a metabolic interaction as evaluated by plasma lidocaine metabolites concentrations. In rabbits, mexiletine seemed to decrease the total plasma clearance of lidocaine, resulting in increased plasma lidocaine concentrations. Mexiletine significantly reduced the tissue distribution of lidocaine to the kidneys and lungs. A strong displacing effect of mexiletine on the binding of lidocaine to phosphatidylserine was observed in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: A drug interaction derived from the displacement of lidocaine from tissue binding sites by mexiletine that resulted in the increased plasma lidocaine concentrations was shown. This observation had implications for loading doses and acute effects of lidocaine in the concurrent therapy of lidocaine and mexiletine.

Evaluation of mexiletine clearance in a Japanese population.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate mexiletine clearance in a Japanese population and to clarify the roles of CYP2D6 and CYP1A2 in mexiletine disposition. METHODS: Concentrations of serum and urinary mexiletine and its metabolites were determined and mexiletine clearances were estimated in 334 inpatients receiving mexiletine therapy. Concentrations of mexiletine and its metabolites in serum and urine samples were determined by HPLC. RESULTS: Although interindividual variation of mexiletine clearance was small, the effect of age on mexiletine clearance was comparatively large. Mexiletine clearance in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) was decreased when compared with other diagnoses (Non-DCM). The fractional contents of p-hydroxymexiletine (POH) and 2-hydroxymexiletine (OHMEX) in urine amounted to approximately 50%. Almost all of the POH was conjugated, whereas less than one-third of the OHMEX was conjugated. Although no significant differences in POH and OHMEX were observed between patients with DCM and those without, a trend toward an increase in conjugation pathway of DCM patients was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The interindividual variation of mexiletine clearance was small, while the effect of age on the mexiletine clearance in Non-DCM was comparatively large. A significant difference in mexiletine clearance between patients with DCM and those with Non-DCM was observed. Therefore, when mexiletine is administered to patients with DCM, careful monitoring is needed.

Influence of the CYP2D6*10 allele on the metabolism of mexiletine by human liver microsomes.

AIMS: To study the influence of CYP2D6*10 on the formation of p-hydroxymexiletine (PHM) and hydroxymethylmexiletine (HMM) using microsomes from human liver of known genotypes. METHODS: Microsomes from human livers of genotype CYP2D6*1/*1 (n = 5), *1/*10 (n = 6) and *10/*10 (n = 6) were used in this study. The formation of PHM and HMM was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: The formation rates of PHM and HMM were decreased by more than 50% and 85% in CYP2D6*1/*10 and *10/*10 microsomes, respectively, compared with *1/*1 microsomes. CONCLUSIONS: The metabolism of mexiletine to form PHM and HMM appears to be impaired to a significant extent in human liver microsomes from hetero- and homozygotes of CYP2D6*10.

Effect of fluvoxamine on the pharmacokinetics of mexiletine in healthy Japanese men.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Fluvoxamine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, is known to inhibit several hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) isozymes, in particular CYP1A2. Mexiletine is mainly catalyzed by CYP2D6 and partially catalyzed by CYP1A2. Our objective was to study the potential pharmacokinetic interaction between fluvoxamine and mexiletine. METHODS: A randomized crossover design with two phases was used. A 7-day washout period separated the two treatment conditions. In the one phase, 6 healthy Japanese men received an oral dose of 200 mg of mexiletine alone (study 1); in the other phase, the men received fluvoxamine (50 mg twice a day) for 7 days, and on the eighth day they received oral mexiletine (200 mg) and fluvoxamine concomitantly (study 2). The concentrations of mexiletine were measured with HPLC. RESULTS: The area under the concentration-time curve and serum peak concentration of mexiletine in study 2 were significantly increased compared with those in study 1 (10.4 +/- 4.85 versus 6.70 +/- 3.21 microg x h/mL, P =.006 and 0.623 +/- 0.133 versus 0.536 +/- 0.164 microg/mL, P =.008, respectively). CONCLUSION: The effect of fluvoxamine on the mexiletine disposition is comparatively large, and when mexiletine and fluvoxamine are coadministered careful monitoring of mexiletine is needed.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction between mexiletine and propafenone in human beings.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Mexiletine and propafenone are often used concomitantly and are metabolized by the same cytochrome P450 isozymes, namely CYP2D6, CYP1A2, and probably CYP3A4. Our objective was to study the potential pharmacokinetic and electrophysiological interactions between mexiletine and propafenone. METHODS: Fifteen healthy volunteers, 8 extensive metabolizers and 7 poor metabolizers of CYP2D6, received oral doses of mexiletine 100 mg two times daily from day 1 to day 8 and oral doses of propafenone 150 mg two times daily from day 5 to day 12. Interdose studies were performed at steady-state on mexiletine alone (day 4), mexiletine plus propafenone (day 8), and propafenone alone (day 12). RESULTS: In subjects in the extensive metabolizer group, coadministration of propafenone decreased oral clearances of R-(-)-mexiletine (from 41+/-11 L/h to 28+/-7 L/h) and S-(+)-mexiletine (from 43+/-15 L/h to 29+/-11 L/h) to an extent such that these values were no longer different between the extensive and the poor metabolizer groups. Propafenone coadministration also decreased partial metabolic clearances of mexiletine to hydroxymethylmexiletine, p-hydroxymexiletine, and m-hydroxymexiletine in extensive metabolizers by 71%, 67%, and 73%, respectively. In contrast, propafenone did not alter the kinetics of mexiletine enantiomers in subjects in the poor metabolizer group except for a slight decrease in the formation of hydroxymethylmexiletine. Pharmacokinetic parameters of propafenone were not changed during concomitant administration of mexiletine in subjects of either phenotype. Finally, electrocardiographic parameters (QRS duration, QTc, RR, and PR intervals) were not modified during the combined administration of the drugs. CONCLUSION: Propafenone is a potent CYP2D6 inhibitor that may cause an increase in plasma concentrations of coadministered CYP2D6 substrates.