Platelet-Rich Plasma Treatment for the Lumbar Spine: A Review and Discussion of Existing Gaps.

BACKGROUND: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is obtained by centrifuging autologous whole blood to extract a layer concentrated with platelets, growth factors found in platelet granules, and cytokines. These components work together to promote and facilitate the healing process at sites of injury. An increasing number of clinical studies are assessing the efficacy of PRP as a treatment for lower back pain. OBJECTIVES: Lumbar back pain is a significant cause of years lived with disability. This paper conducts a thorough review of clinical studies on intradiscal, facet-joint, epidural, and mixed-target PRP interventions in the lumbar spine. Furthermore, gaps in the current literature regarding lumbar spinal PRP injections are identified to help guide future clinical trials. STUDY DESIGN: Literature review. METHODS: An initial search was conducted using Ovid MEDLINE, focusing on PRP injections in the spine. Boolean operators were used to combine MeSH terms and key words such as "spine," "lumbar spine," "thoracic spine," "cervical spine," "intervertebral disc," "platelet-rich plasma," and "inject." The search revealed an absence of papers about PRP injections into the cervical and thoracic spine, so the review was written with a specific focus on the lumbar spine. For the purposes of this paper, the selected manuscripts were separated into categories of intradiscal, facet-joint, epidural, and mixed-target PRP injections. RESULTS: A multitude of case reports, case series, prospective clinical studies, and randomized controlled trials have yielded results supporting the use of intradiscal, facet-joint, and epidural PRP injections in the lumbar spine. However, a handful of papers suggest that PRP lacks efficacy in improving lumbar back pain and function. With the relative dearth of literature assessing the effects of spinal PRP injections, additional double-blinded randomized trials are needed. Important findings from available studies include the observation of PRP's increased efficacy over time, the correlation of the number of targeted injection sites with the efficacy of PRP injections, and the correlation of platelet count with PRP injections' efficacy. LIMITATIONS: There exists wide variability in PRP preparation protocols and in the methods of assessing PRP's therapeutic benefits between each study that evaluates PRP's effects in the lumbar spine. CONCLUSIONS: All clinical studies evaluating PRP as a form of treatment for the lumbar spine should include full transparency and details about the methods used for PRP preparation and injection. Future double-blinded randomized trials can fill in existing gaps by assessing the effects of platelet concentration and dose on the extent of clinical improvement as well as by establishing an expected timeline for clinical improvement after PRP injections. Cross-study standardization of which pain scoring systems to utilize for study evaluation would increase comparability among different papers.

The MuscleSCS Technique (4-8Hz BurstDRTM Octrode™): A Randomized Clinical Study of MuscleSCS Stimulation in the Treatment of Chronic Back Pain.

BACKGROUND: MuscleSCS is a new technique that combines spinal cord stimulation (SCS) with muscle stimulation to relieve pain. OBJECTIVES: In this clinical study, we wanted to use rod electrodes to investigate the MuscleSCS method's effectiveness in the treatment of chronic lower back pain. One of our hypotheses was that the combined use of MuscleSCS and BurstDRTM would further improve the treatment. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, single-center, single-blinded, randomized crossover study. SETTING: A university medical center. METHODS: Patients with chronic lower back pain had previously (one to 10 years ago) received an SCS system (Octrode™). In this study, they were randomly treated for 2 weeks each with BurstDRTM stimulation alone, MuscleSCS stimulation alone, or a combination of BurstDRTM stimulation and MuscleSCS stimulation. Thereafter, the patients were treated for another 6 weeks with one of the 3 methods (crossover possible). Pain ratings on the visual analog scale (VAS) were recorded and compared. A Pain Disability Index (PDI) questionnaire was used at the baseline and at 3 months. RESULTS: We included 24 patients in this study (11 women, mean age 62.3 yrs.) The values of the second week of the stimulation were the only ones used for the calculations. The first week of the stimulation was used as a wash-out period.The combined application of BurstDRTM and MuscleSCS stimulation was associated with the best results (P = 0.032). PDI scores did not improve during this treatment. No serious adverse events occurred during this study. Seventy-one and a half percent of the patients experienced an improvement in their pain as a result of the additional MuscleSCS stimulation. LIMITATIONS: In this study, only one fixed contact setting (3 & 4) was used to ensure uniform conditions for all patients and the ability to compare the different treatment modes. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the combined application of SCS (BurstDRTM) and additional MuscleSCS stimulation using a rod electrode could significantly improve outcomes for patients suffering from chronic back pain.

Effectiveness of a physiotherapy self-management programme for adult patients with chronic non-specific low back pain in low- and middle-income countries: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP) is among the most common musculoskeletal system conditions reported worldwide; however, few studies are available from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Self-management is a set of tasks performed by the patient aiming at managing their symptoms and interference in activities, mood and relationships due to pain. A physiotherapy-guided self-management programme (SMP) following a biopsychosocial approach has been reported as effective and affordable in the management of CNLBP in high-income countries. The objective of this systematic review is to determine the overall effectiveness of SMPs for adults with CNLBP in LMICs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this systematic review, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Protocol (PRISMA-P) guidelines will be followed. A three-step search strategy will be used to search the electronic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, Scopus and CINAHL, Academic Search Complete and PEDro) for randomised controlled trials assessing the effectiveness of physiotherapy-guided self-management for CNLBP among adult participants in LMICs. The processes of screening search results for eligible studies, extracting data from included studies and appraising will be done independently by at least two review authors. Random effects meta-analysis will be used to synthesise results and heterogeneity will be assessed using the I2 test statistic and χ2 test. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics clearance was obtained for the broader PhD study on the development of a physiotherapy-guided SMP for adult people with CNLBP in Limpopo Province, South Africa. The results of the manuscript for this protocol will be published in peer-reviewed journals and also presented at conferences, symposia, and congresses. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023399572.

Exploring the association between adherence to home-based exercise recommendations and recovery of nonspecific low back pain: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Adherence to home-based exercise (HBE) recommendations is critical in physiotherapy for patients with low back pain (LBP). However, limited research has explored its connection with clinical outcomes. This study examined how adherence to HBE relates to changes in physical function, pain intensity, and recovery from LBP in patients undergoing physiotherapy treatment. METHODS: Data from a multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial in the Netherlands involving patients with LBP from 58 primary care physiotherapy practices were used. Adherence to HBE was assessed with the Exercise Adherence Scale (EXAS) at each treatment session. Previously identified adherence trajectories served as a longitudinal measure of adherence and included the classes "declining adherence" (12% of participants), "stable adherence" (45%), and "increasing adherence" (43%). The main outcomes included disability (Oswestry Disability Index), pain (Numeric Pain Rating Scale), and recovery (pain-free for > 4 weeks), which were measured at baseline and after three months. Linear and binomial logistic regression analyses adjusted for confounders were used to examine adherence-outcome relationships. RESULTS: In the parent trial, 208 participants were included. EXAS scores were available for 173 participants, collected over a median of 4.0 treatment sessions (IQR 3.0 to 6.0). Forty-five (28.5%) patients considered themselves to have recovered after three months. The median changes in the Oswestry Disability Index and Numeric Pain Rating Scale were - 8 (IQR - 1 to -20) and - 2 (IQR - 0.5 to -4), respectively. The mean EXAS scores varied among patient classes: "declining adherence" (46.0, SD 19.4), "stable adherence" (81.0, SD 12.4), and "increasing adherence" (39.9, SD 25.3), with an overall mean of 59.2 (SD 25.3). No associations between adherence and changes in physical functioning or pain were found in the regression analyses. CONCLUSIONS: No association between adherence to HBE recommendations and changes in clinical outcomes in patients with LBP was found. These findings suggest that the relationship between adherence to HBE recommendations and treatment outcomes may be more complex than initially assumed. Further research using detailed longitudinal data combined with qualitative methods to investigate patient motivation and beliefs may lead to a deeper understanding of the relationship between adherence and clinical outcomes in patients with LBP.

Significant overlap of inflammatory and degenerative features on imaging among patients with degenerative disc disease, diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis and axial spondyloarthritis: a real-life cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Differentiating between degenerative disc disease (DDD), diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH), and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) represents a diagnostic challenge in patients with low back pain (LBP). We aimed to evaluate the distribution of inflammatory and degenerative imaging features in a real-life cohort of LBP patients referred to a tertiary university rheumatology center. METHODS: In a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of patients referred for LBP, demographics, symptom information, and available imaging were collected. SpA-like changes were considered in the spine in the presence of one of the following lesions typically related to SpA: erosions, sclerosis, squaring, and syndesmophytes on conventional radiographs (CR) and bone marrow oedema (BMO), erosions, sclerosis, and fat lesions (FL) on MRI. SIJ CR were graded per New York criteria; on MRIs, SIJs were evaluated by quadrant for BMO, erosions, FL, sclerosis and ankylosis, similar to the approach used by the Berlin SIJ MRI scoring system. The final diagnosis made by the rheumatologist was the gold standard. Data were presented descriptively, by patient and by quadrant, and compared among the three diagnosis groups. RESULTS: Among 136 referred patients, 71 had DDD, 38 DISH, and 27 axSpA; median age 62 years [IQR55-73], 63% males. On CR, SpA-like changes were significantly higher in axSpA in the lumbar (50%, vs. DDD 23%, DISH 22%), in DISH in the thoracic (28%, vs. DDD 8%, axSpA 12%), and in DDD in the cervical spine (67% vs. DISH 0%, axSpA 33%). On MRI, BMO was significantly higher in DISH in the thoracic (37%, vs. DDD 22%, axSpA 5%) and equally distributed in the lumbar spine (35-42%). FL were significantly more frequently identified in DISH and axSpA in the thoracic (56% and 52%) and DDD and axSpA in the lumbar spine (65% and 74%, respectively). Degenerative changes were frequent in the three groups. Sacroiliitis (NY criteria) was identified in 49% (axSpA 76%, DDD 48%, DISH 29%). CONCLUSION: A significant overlap was found among DDD, DISH, and axSpA for inflammatory and degenerative imaging features. Particularly, SpA-like spine CR features were found in one-fourth of patients with DISH, and MRI BMO was found in one-third of those patients.

[Bilateral facial palsy: an atypical presentation of Lyme disease (a case report)]. / Paralysie faciale bilatérale : une présentation atypique d'une maladie de Lyme (cas clinique).

Lyme neuroborreliosis is a rare zoonosis which can be difficult to diagnose, in particular in low endemic areas. We here report the case of a 35-year-old man presenting with disabling back pain preceded by facial monoplegia, which was wrongly treated as Bell's palsy (paralysis a frigore) and then as post-traumatic lumbosciatica. The onset of facial diplegia allowed for a definitive diagnosis. The patient was treated with ceftriaxone and symptoms gradually improved.

The implementation study of nurses' work related low back pain prevention and care guideline: A quasi-experimental study.

AIM: To understand the implementation process and outcomes of nurses' work related low back pain (WLBP) prevention and care guideline. BACKGROUND: WLBP is a common occupational injury for clinical nurses. We developed the first evidence-based guideline of nurses' WLBP prevention and care of its kind both at home and abroad, and it is necessary for us to explore its feasibility, appropriateness and effectiveness in practice. METHODS: Based on the model of the integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services, we performed a four-phase implementation study in a tertiary hospital. The study was a non-randomized concurrent controlled trial design，and multilevel measures were examined including implementation outcomes and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: For the implementation outcomes, the tailored recommendations of the guideline were found to be acceptable, appropriate, feasible, and well adopted both at the unit level and the hospital level. The clinical outcomes indicated that, compared with the control unit, nurses of the treatment unit performed better in awareness, knowledge, practice of WLBP prevention and care. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation study supports the successful application of the guideline, which can serve as a valuable evidence-based document to improve back health of nursing personnel.

Perceptions of advice for acute low back pain: a content analysis of qualitative data collected in a randomised experiment.

OBJECTIVES: To explore how people perceive three different forms of advice for acute low back pain (LBP). DESIGN: Content analysis of qualitative data collected in a three-arm randomised experiment. PARTICIPANTS: 2200 participants with acute LBP (ie, pain duration for ≤6 weeks) were randomly assigned to receive three types of advice: guideline advice and guideline advice with the addition of either brief pain science or ergonomics messages. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: After receiving the advice, participants answered two questions: 'If your health professional gave you this advice, how would it make you feel?' and 'If your health professional gave you this advice, what treatments (if any) do you think you would need?' Two researchers coded responses using deductive content analysis. RESULTS: We analysed 4400 free-text responses from 2200 participants. There were little to no differences in participants' feelings, thoughts and expectations after receiving three types of advice for acute LBP. Participants most commonly expressed feeling positive about the advice (38%-35%), reassured (23%-22%) and empowered (10%-8%). Some expressed being unhappy or being frustrated with the advice (4%-3%). Participants most commonly thought they needed no treatment apart from staying active, followed by exercise and medication. CONCLUSIONS: Guideline advice with or without the addition of brief pain science or ergonomics messages generated positive feelings, reassurance or a sense of empowerment in many people with acute LBP, with no difference between types of advice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12623000364673.

Inhibiting the JNK Signaling Pathway Attenuates Hypersensitivity and Anxiety-Like Behavior in a Rat Model of Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain.

Low back pain (LBP) has become a leading cause of disability worldwide. Astrocyte activation in the spinal cord plays an important role in the maintenance of latent sensitization of dorsal horn neurons in LBP. However, the role of spinal c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) in astrocytes in modulating pain behavior of LBP model rats and its neurobiological mechanism have not been elucidated. Here, we investigate the role of the JNK signaling pathway on hypersensitivity and anxiety-like behavior caused by repetitive nerve growth factor (NGF) injections in male non-specific LBP model rats. LBP was produced by two injections (day 0, day 5) of NGF into multifidus muscle of the low backs of rats. We observed prolonged mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity in the low backs or hindpaws. Persistent anxiety-like behavior was observed, together with astrocyte, p-JNK, and neuronal activation and upregulated expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 1 (CXCL1) proteins in the spinal L2 segment. Second, the JNK inhibitor SP600125 was intrathecally administrated in rats from day 10 to day 12. It attenuated mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity of the low back or hindpaws and anxiety-like behavior. Meanwhile, SP600125 decreased astrocyte and neuronal activation and the expression of MCP-1 and CXCL1 proteins. These results showed that hypersensitivity and anxiety-like behavior induced by NGF in LBP rats could be attenuated by the JNK inhibitor, together with downregulation of spinal astrocyte activation, neuron activation, and inflammatory cytokines. Our results indicate that intervening with the spinal JNK signaling pathway presents an effective therapeutic approach to alleviating LBP.

Effect of exercise on cluneal nerve entrapment neuropathy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Low back pain is an important disability problem frequently encountered in the clinic. In the literature, it has been shown that neuropathic pain in chronic low back pain is quite common in patients. Although superior cluneal nerve entrapment syndrome is an underdiagnosed cause of low back and leg pain, differential diagnosis is very important anatomically and clinically. The superior cluneal nerves are pure sensory nerves that innervate the skin of the upper part of the buttocks. In the literature, methods such as surgery, nerve blockade, prolotherapy, and acupuncture have been used in the treatment of cluneal nerve entrapment syndrome, but there are no studies on exercise. In this case report, our aim is to explain the importance of differential diagnosis in cluneal nerve entrapment syndrome, which is one of the common causes of low back pain in the clinic, and the effects of exercise in this disease. CASE PRESENTATION: A 22-year-old, Turkish-ethnicity, male patient with complaints of low back pain, neck-back pain, and weakness did not use alcohol or cigarettes. In his family history, there was a history of diabetes in the mother and diabetes and heart failure in the father. He had a history of osteoporosis, epilepsy, asthma, sarcoidosis, and cardiac arrhythmia. The patient reported that he suffered from constipation three to four times a month. As a result of the detailed evaluation, the planned exercise prescription was taught to the patient, and after it was confirmed that the patient did the exercises correctly for 3 days, the exercise brochure was given and followed as a home exercise program for 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar stabilization exercises, gluteal muscle strengthening exercises, thoracolumbar fascia mobilization, and stretching exercises, which will be given in accordance with the clinical anatomy of the disease after the correct diagnosis in cluneal nerve entrapment syndrome, have been beneficial for the patient. However, we think that randomized controlled studies with a large sample will contribute to the literature.

Outcomes after selective nerve root blockade for lumbar radicular pain from lumbar disc hernia or lumbar spinal stenosis assessed by the PROMIS-29 - a prospective observational cohort study.

PURPOSE: Selective nerve root blocks (SNRB) are used both as a therapeutic and diagnostic tool for lumbar radicular pain. Most studies evaluate the effect of SNRB simply by its relation to pain reduction. It is well known that pain is associated with other factors such as depression, anxiety, inactivity and sleeping disorders, but these patient-related outcomes are seldom evaluated. This study evaluated the influence of SNRB on pain-related outcomes including depression, anxiety, fatigue, pain interference, activity and sleep. METHODS: One hundred three patients with lumbar radicular pain were treated with a SNRB. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed with the PROMIS-29 for 12 weeks (84 days) following the SNRB. Patients were stratified based on their pain reduction at the 14-day follow up as responders (≥ 30% pain reduction) and non-responders (< 30% pain reduction). Post-treatment duration was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier analysis with return to baseline as an event. A paired t-test was used to compare pre- and post-treatment responses at specific time intervals. RESULTS: Forty-four percent (n = 45) of the patients were responders and showed significant improvement in all parameters throughout the 84-days follow-up, the exception was sleep that lost significance at day 70. The mean post-treatment duration among responders was 59 (52-67) days. Non-responders showed significant improvements in pain interference and pain intensity until day 35 and in ability for social participation until 21-day. CONCLUSION: SNRB can improve pain intensity, pain interference, physical function, fatigue, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance and the ability to participate in social roles.

Effect of exercise and manual therapy or kinesiotaping on sEMG and pain perception in chronic low back pain: a randomized trial.

The importance of incorporating lumbo-pelvic stability core and controlling motor exercises in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) reinforces the use of strategies to improve biopsychosocial beliefs by reducing biomedical postulations. However, clinical practice guidelines recommend multimodal approaches incorporating exercise and manual therapy (MT), and instead reject the application of kinesiotape (KT) in isolation. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to analyze the effects of 12 weeks of exercises combined with MT or KT on perceived low back pain using the visual analog scale (VAS) and muscle electric activity measured with electromyography (EMG) of the rectus abdominis and multifidus in CLBP (mild disability) and to explore the relationship between the rectus abdominis and multifidus ratios and pain perception after intervention. A blinded, 12-week randomized controlled trial (RCT) was carried out, involving three parallel groups of patients with CLBP. The study was registered at Clinicaltrial.gov and assigned the identification number NCT05544890 (19/09/22). The trial underwent an intention-to-treat analysis. The primary outcome revealed a multimodal treatment program supplemented by additional therapies such as MT and KT, resulting in significant reductions in perceived low back pain. The subjective assessment of individuals with CLBP indicated no discernible distinction between exclusive core stability exercises and control-motor training when combined with MT or KT. Notably, our findings demonstrated positive alterations in both the mean and peak EMG values of the right rectus abdominis in the exercise group, suggesting a beneficial impact on muscle activation. This study focused on assessing the activation levels of the trunk musculature, specifically the rectus abdominis (RA) and multifidus (MF), in individuals with CLBP exhibiting mild disability according to the Oswestry Disability Index. Importantly, improvements in the VAS values were observed independently of changes in muscle electrical activity.

Lumbar braces and other assistive devices for treatment of chronic low back pain.

OBJECTIVES: This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the benefits and harms of assistive technologies (i.e. non-rigid and rigid lumbar braces, belts, supports, and devices to assist mobility and gait) for improving pain and function (and consequently reducing disability) in adults with chronic low back pain.

Advances in the interaction between lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration and fat infiltration of paraspinal muscles: critical summarization, classification, and perspectives.

More than 619 million people in the world suffer from low back pain (LBP). As two potential inducers of LBP, intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) and fat infiltration of paraspinal muscles (PSMs) have attracted extensive attention in recent years. So far, only one review has been presented to summarize their relationship and relevant mechanisms. Nevertheless, it has several noticeable drawbacks, such as incomplete categorization and discussion, lack of practical proposals, etc. Consequently, this paper aims to systematically summarize and classify the interaction between IVDD and fat infiltration of PSMs, thus providing a one-stop search handbook for future studies. As a result, four mechanisms of IVDD leading to fat infiltration of PSMs and three mechanisms of fat infiltration in PSMs causing IVDD are thoroughly analyzed and summarized. The typical reseaches are tabulated and evaluated from four aspects, i.e., methods, conclusions, benefits, and drawbacks. We find that IVDD and fat infiltration of PSMs is a vicious cycle that can promote the occurrence and development of each other, ultimately leading to LBP and disability. Finally, eight perspectives are proposed for future in-depth research.

An Observational Study of Various Risk Factors and Etiological Profile in Patients with Lower Back Pain at Tertiary Care Center.

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to analyze the risk factors and etiological profile of lower back pain (LBP) among patients attending a neurology outpatient department at a tertiary care center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted, involving 170 patients, aged over 18, presenting with LBP between March and August 2023. Sociodemographic and lifestyle data were collected, and diagnostic investigations, including X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), were performed. Patients were categorized into acute and chronic LBP groups for analysis. RESULTS: Age-acute LBP was more prevalent in younger patients (<35 years), while chronic LBP was predominant in older age-groups (≥55 years). Gender-females showed a higher prevalence of LBP compared to males, with chronic LBP more common among females. Triggering events-heavy weightlifting was a significant trigger for chronic LBP, while coughing/sneezing was common in acute LBP. Occupation-patients with physically exerting jobs were more prone to acute LBP, while chronic LBP was prevalent among homemakers and those with no work. Body mass index (BMI)-obesity and overweight were associated with chronic LBP. Medication-chronic LBP patients were more likely to be on medication compared to acute LBP patients. MRI findings-prolapsed intervertebral disk (PIVD) was the most prevalent etiology, more common in chronic LBP patients. Other etiologies included vertebral fracture, tumor, tuberculosis, and various spinal conditions. CONCLUSION: Lower back pain is a multifaceted condition influenced by age, gender, BMI, and lifestyle factors. Effective management and prevention strategies should consider these risk factors to improve patients' quality of life. A comprehensive approach is essential to address the complex etiology of LBP.

Association of MRI findings with paraspinal muscles fat infiltration at lower lumbar levels in patients with chronic low back pain: a multicenter prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: In chronic low back pain (CLBP), the relationship between spinal pathologies and paraspinal muscles fat infiltration remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between MRI findings and paraspinal muscles morphology and fat infiltration in CLBP patients by quantitative MRI. METHODS: All the CLBP patients were enrolled from July 2021 to December 2022 in four medical institutions. The cross-sectional area (CSA) and proton density fat fraction (PDFF) of the multifidus (MF) and erector spinae (ES) muscles at the central level of the L4/5 and L5/S1 intervertebral discs were measured. MRI findings included degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS), intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD), facet arthrosis, disc bulge or herniation, and disease duration. The relationship between MRI findings and the paraspinal muscles PDFF and CSA in CLBP patients was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 493 CLBP patients were included in the study (198 females, 295 males), with an average age of 45.68 ± 12.91 years. Our research indicates that the number of MRI findings are correlated with the paraspinal muscles PDFF at the L4/5 level, but is not significant. Moreover, the grading of IVDD is the primary factor influencing the paraspinal muscles PDFF at the L4-S1 level (BES at L4/5=1.845, P < 0.05); DLS was a significant factor affecting the PDFF of MF at the L4/5 level (B = 4.774, P < 0.05). After including age, gender, and Body Mass Index (BMI) as control variables in the multivariable regression analysis, age has a significant positive impact on the paraspinal muscles PDFF at the L4-S1 level, with the largest AUC for ES PDFF at the L4/5 level (AUC = 0.646, cut-off value = 47.5), while males have lower PDFF compared to females. BMI has a positive impact on the ES PDFF only at the L4/5 level (AUC = 0.559, cut-off value = 24.535). CONCLUSION: The degree of paraspinal muscles fat infiltration in CLBP patients is related to the cumulative or synergistic effects of multiple factors, especially at the L4/L5 level. Although age and BMI are important factors affecting the degree of paraspinal muscles PDFF in CLBP patients, their diagnostic efficacy is moderate.

Effects of combined anodal transcranial direct current stimulation and motor control exercise on cortical topography and muscle activation in individuals with chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Aberrant movement in chronic low back pain (CLBP) is associated with a deficit in the lumbar multifidus (LM) and changes in cortical topography. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) can be used to enhance cortical excitability by priming the neuromuscular system for motor control exercise (MCE), thereby enhancing LM activation and movement control. This study aimed to determine the effects of a 6-week MCE program combined with a-tDCS on cortical topography, LM activation, movement patterns, and clinical outcomes in individuals with CLBP. METHODS: Twenty-two individuals with CLBP were randomly allocated to the a-tDCS group (a-tDCS; n = 12) or sham-tDCS group (s-tDCS; n = 10). Both groups received 20 min of tDCS followed by 30 min of MCE. The LM and erector spinae (ES) cortical topography, LM activation, movement control battery tests, and clinical outcomes (disability and quality of life) were measured pre- and post-intervention. RESULTS: Significant interaction (group × time; p < 0.01) was found in the distance between LM and ES cortical locations. The a-tDCS group demonstrated significantly fewer discrete peaks (p < 0.05) in both ES and LM and significant improvements (p < 0.05) in clinical outcomes post-intervention. The s-tDCS group demonstrated a significant increase (p < 0.05) in the number of discrete peaks in the LM cortical topography. No significant changes (p > 0.05) in LM activation were observed in either group; however, both groups demonstrated improved movement patterns. DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest that combined a-tDCS with MCE can separate LM and ES locations over time while s-tDCS (MCE alone) reduces the distance. Our study did not find superior benefits of adding a-tDCS before MCE for LM activation, movement patterns, or clinical outcomes.

Using Resistance-Band Tests to Evaluate Trunk Muscle Strength in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Test-Retest Reliability Study.

Exercise is a front-line intervention to increase functional capacity and reduce pain and disability in people with low strength levels or disorders. However, there is a lack of validated field-based tests to check the initial status and, more importantly, to control the process and make tailored adjustments in load, intensity, and recovery. We aimed to determine the test-retest reliability of a submaximal, resistance-band test to evaluate the strength of the trunk stability muscles using a portable force sensor in middle-aged adults (48 ± 13 years) with medically diagnosed chronic low back pain and healthy peers (n = 35). Participants completed two submaximal progressive tests of two resistance-band exercises (unilateral row and Pallof press), consisting of 5 s maintained contraction, progressively increasing the load. The test stopped when deviation from the initial position by compensation movements occurred. Trunk muscle strength (CORE muscles) was monitored in real time using a portable force sensor (strain gauge). Results revealed that both tests were highly reliable (intra-class correlation [ICC] > 0.901) and presented low errors and coefficients of variation (CV) in both groups. In particular, people with low back pain had errors of 14-19 N (CV = 9-12%) in the unilateral row test and 13-19 N (CV = 8-12%) in the Pallof press. No discomfort or pain was reported during or after the tests. These two easy-to-use and technology-based tests result in a reliable and objective screening tool to evaluate the strength and trunk stability in middle-aged adults with chronic low back pain, considering an error of measurement < 20 N. This contribution may have an impact on improving the individualization and control of rehabilitation or physical training in people with lumbar injuries or disorders.

Lipid levels and low back pain risk: A two-sample mendelian randomization study.

BACKGROUND: Previous observational studies have shown controversial results about the relationship between lipid levels and low back pain (LBP). Herein, we aimed to explore the potential causal relationship between lipid levels and LBP by using the mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. METHODS: In this two-sample MR study, data were extracted from publicly available MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit database. Three single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of lipid levels [high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and triglycerides (TG)] and two SNPs of LBP risk (LBP and back pain) were retrieved and used as genetic instrumental variables. Inverse-variance weighted (IVW), weighted median, MR-Egger, robust adjusted profile score (MR-RAPS), and MR-PRESSO were used to examine the potential causal association between lipid levels and LBP. RESULTS: IVW (fixed effect) estimation indicated that increased HDL-C level was negatively related to the odds of LBP for European populations. [odds ratio (OR) = 0.923, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.857-0.993, P = 0.0323]. Similar results were also found in IVW (random effect) (OR = 0.923, 95% CI: 0.866-0.983, P = 0.0134), MR-Egger (OR = 0.858, 95%CI: 0.757-0.973, P = 0.0177), MR-RAPS (OR = 0.932, 95%CI: 0.871-0.997, P = 0.0419), and MR-PRESSO (OR = 0.933, 95%CI: 0.880-0.989, P = 0.0198) analyses. Whereas no causal link was observed between LDL-C/TG and LBP risk (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: This two-sample MR study demonstrated a causal relationship between lipid levels and LBP risk. Further investigations are necessary to elucidate the causal association and specific underlying mechanisms by which lipid levels contribute to the development of LBP.