Neuroendocrine predictors of vasoplegia after cardiopulmonary bypass.

PURPOSE: Vasoplegia often complicates on-pump cardiac surgery. Systemic inflammatory response induced by extracorporeal circulation represents the major determinant, but adrenal insufficiency and postoperative vasopressin deficiency may have a role. Pathophysiological meaning of perioperative changes in endocrine markers of hydro-electrolyte balance has not still fully elucidated. Objectives of the present research study were to estimate the incidence of vasoplegia in a homogeneous cohort of not severe cardiopathic patients, to define the role of presurgical adrenal insufficiency, to evaluate copeptin and NT-proBNP trends in the perioperative. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study in the cardiac intensive care unit of a tertiary referral center. We evaluated 350 consecutive patients scheduled for cardiac surgery; 55 subjects completed the study. Both standard and low-dose corticotropin stimulation tests were performed in the preoperative; copeptin and NT-proBNP were evaluated in the preoperative (T0), on day 1 (T1) and day 7 (T2) after surgery. RESULTS: Nine subjects (16.3%) developed vasoplegic syndrome with longer bypass and clamping time (p < 0.001). Reduced response to low-dose ACTH test was not associated to vasoplegia. Preoperative copeptin > 16.9 pmol/L accurately predicted the syndrome (AUC 0.86, 95% CI 0.73-0.94; OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.04-1.32). An evident correlation was observed at 7 days postoperative between NT-proBNP and copeptin (r 0.88, 95% CI 0.8-0.93; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Preoperative impaired response to low-dose ACTH stimulation test is not a risk factor for post-cardiotomic vasoplegia; conversely, higher preoperative copeptin predicts the complication. On-pump cardiac surgery could be an interesting model of rapid heart failure progression.

Impact of short-term treatment with benzodiazepines and imidazopyridines on glucose metabolism in healthy subjects.

AIM: In the last years there has been a progressive reduction of the average duration of sleep and an increase in the incidence of sleep disturbances. At the same time, an increase of the incidence of the metabolic syndrome has been described, partly attributable to the progressive worsening of dietary habits and the increase in sedentary lifestyle. Recent studies suggest that adequate sleep is essential to maintain good glucose metabolism and sleep disturbances may contribute to the manifestation of the metabolic syndrome. Benzodiazepines (BZ), such as brotizolam, and imidazopyridines, such as zolpidem, are frequently used as hypnotics but their potential impact on glucose metabolism has never been evaluated so far. METHODS: In 12 healthy volunteers [age (mean ± SEM) 38.3 ± 8.1 years; body mass index (BMI) 21.9 ± 0.8 kg/m²] we studied glucose and insulin responses to oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT, 75 g) before and after 15 days treatment with brotizolam 0.25 mg/day or zolpidem 10 mg/day. RESULTS: Brotizolam increased glucose delta area under curve response to the OGTT by 122 % (p < 0.01) and zolpidem by 86 % (p < 0.01) without significant variations of insulin levels, suggesting an impact on insulin sensitivity and/or insulin secretion. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that BZ and imidazopyridines have a rapid glucometabolic effect that is detectable as early as after 15 days treatment.

Does use of metformin protect against cancer in Type 2 diabetes mellitus?

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus has been associated with an increased cancer risk, which can be modified by specific hypoglycemic drugs. In particular, metformin, the most frequently prescribed biguanide, is now considered a protective agent against cancer incidence and mortality in Type 2 diabetic patients. AIMS: To review the potential associations between metformin use and cancer incidence and mortality and the possible biological links implicated in these associations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched English-language original investigations published through September 2011. RESULTS: Metformin could block the mitogenic effects of insulin, but this effect does not entirely explain the reduction in cancer incidence. Metformin also plays a direct inhibition of cancer cell growth via the inhibitory effects of AMP-activated protein kinase on the mTOR pathway, which regulates cell growth and proliferation. Accordingly, many epidemiological studies have shown that metformin use is associated with a lower cancer incidence and mortality through a dose-response relationship, with greater exposure being associated with stronger risk reduction. Randomized clinical trials testing the effects of metformin on both recurrence and survival in early-stage breast cancer are on-going; these trials are based on pilot studies demonstrating an adjuvant effect of this drug in breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Metformin is an inexpensive and safe drug, that may modify the increased cancer risk of Type 2 diabetic patients. On-going clinical trials will show whether this drug can enhance the effect of chemotherapy in the treatment of cancer.

The metabolic response to the activation of the beta-adrenergic receptor by salbutamol is amplified by acylated ghrelin.

BACKGROUND: It is well recognized that beta-adrenergic receptors mediate important endocrine and metabolic actions. In fact, beta-adrenergic receptor activation negatively influences GH secretion while exerting relevant metabolic actions such as the stimulation of insulin secretion, glycogenolysis, and lipolysis. AIM: We have already shown that the activation of the GH secretagogue receptor (GHS-R)-1a by acylated ghrelin (AG) counteracts the inhibitory effect of salbutamol (SALB), a beta2-adrenergic agonist, on GH release. The aim of the present study in humans was to clarify whether the metabolic response to SALB is affected by the infusion of AG, also known to exert significant metabolic actions. METHODS: Six healthy young male volunteers underwent the following testing sessions in random order at least 5 days apart: a) SALB (0.06 microg/kg/min iv from 0 to 60 min) alone; b) SALB in combination with AG (1.0 microg/kg/min iv from -60 to 60 min); c) isotonic saline. Insulin, glucose, and free fatty acids (FFA) levels were evaluated every 15 min. RESULTS: As expected, with respect to saline, SALB administration tended to increase both insulin secretion [Delta area under the curve (DeltaAUC): 0.16+/-0.09 vs 0.003+/-0.077 x 10(3) microU/ml/min; p>0.05] and FFA levels (DeltaAUC: 8.0+/-7.3 vs -4.0+/-4.0 mEq/l/min; p>0.05), while glucose levels did not change. The metabolic response to SALB was significantly modified under the exposure of AG. In fact, under AG infusion, SALB elicited a more marked increase of FFA (DeltaAUC: 22.3+/-3.2 vs 8.0+/-7.3 mEq/l/min; p<0.05) as well as a slight elevation in insulin (DeltaAUC: 0.37+/-0.11 vs 0.16+/-0.09 x 10(3) microU/ml/min; p>0.05). Under AG, the baseline glucose levels were more elevated but, again, in combination with AG, SALB did not significantly modify glucose levels. CONCLUSIONS: Beta-adrenergic receptors and AG are likely to interact at the metabolic level. In humans, the lypolitic response to a beta2-adrenergic agonist such as SALB is amplified by AG. Meanwhile, during the co-treatment, the marginal insulinotropic effect was not associated with an increase in glycemia.

Circulating obestatin levels in normal and Type 2 diabetic subjects.

BACKGROUND: Obestatin has been discovered as a new product of the ghrelin gene. Its physiological actions are still a matter of debate, but it seems that this peptide is likely to be involved in the control of insulin secretion and action as well as of adipocyte function. It has been already shown that obestatin secretion in humans is negatively modulated by food intake. AIM: To clarify obestatin secretion in normal subjects and in patients with Type 2 diabetes (T2D) in basal conditions and after a standardized meal. SUBJECTS/METHODS: Five normal subjects and 5 T2D patients were studied during infusion of saline (iv for over 5 h from -120 to +180 min). A standardized lunch was served at 0 min. Obestatin, glucose, and insulin levels were assayed at -120, -90, -60, -45, -30, -15, 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 min. RESULTS: From -120 to 0 min, obestatin levels in normal and T2D subjects were similar (area under the curve: 32.3+/-5.6 pg/ml/min vs 31.1+/-1.0 pg/ml/min). After the meal, circulating obestatin levels underwent a clear decrease in normal subjects (0 min: 300.6+/-34.7 pg/ml vs nadir at 60 min: 161.8+/-29.4 pg/ml; p=0.002) but not in diabetic patients (0 min: 267.2+/-16.5 pg/ml vs nadir at 180 min: 226.0+/-10.5 pg/ml). CONCLUSION: This study shows that normal and diabetic subjects display similar levels of circulating obestatin in fasting condition. However patients with T2D look refractory to the inhibitory effect of meal on obestatin secretion.

Beta-adrenergic agonism does not impair the GH response to acylated ghrelin in humans.

BACKGROUND: Acylated ghrelin (AG) is a physiological GH secretion amplifier, in part stimulating GHRH neurones and antagonizing somatostatin activity. In humans, AG is one of the most potent pharmacological stimuli of GH secretion and, unlike GHRH, is refractory to the inhibitory effect of glucose, free fatty acids (FFA) and somatostatin. Somatotroph secretion is also profoundly modulated by the adrenergic system. Indeed, beta-adrenergic agonists abolish spontaneous and GHRH-stimulated GH secretion. Based on these data, the aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of beta adrenergic agonism on the GH response to AG. SUBJECTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Six young healthy male volunteers underwent: (a) acute AG intravenous (iv) administration (1.0 microg/kg); (b) salbutamol infusion (SLB; 0.06 microg/kg/min iv); (c) AG + SLB; and (d) saline infusion. In all sessions GH levels were assayed every 15 min from time -30 to +210 min. RESULTS: SLB induced a significant (P < 0.05) inhibition of spontaneous GH secretion that persisted up to 75 min after SLB withdrawal. AG induced a marked increase (P < 0.01) in GH that was not modified by SLB. CONCLUSIONS: The GH-releasing effect of AG is refractory to the inhibitory effect of SLB-induced beta-adrenergic receptor activation. Although further studies are needed to confirm these results during the lifespan and particularly during prolonged exposure to beta agonists, the present data clearly suggest that, among GH stimulatory tests, AG administration might be the most suitable in clinical conditions of chronic treatment with beta-2 agonists, such as in asthmatic disease.

Metabolic and cardiovascular profile in patients with Addison's disease under conventional glucocorticoid replacement.

OBJECTIVE: Although two studies have shown that Addison's disease (AD) is still a potentially lethal condition for cardiovascular, malignant, and infectious diseases, a recent retrospective study showed a normal overall mortality rate. Differently from secondary hypoadrenalism, scanty data exist on the role of conventional glucocorticoid replacement on metabolic and cardiovascular outcome in AD. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In 38 AD under conventional glucocorticoid replacement (hydrocortisone 30 mg/day or cortisone 37.5 mg/day) ACTH, plasma renin activity (PRA), DHEAS, fasting glucose and insulin, 2-h glucose after oral glucose tolerance test, serum lipids, 24-h blood pressure and intima-media thickness (IMT) were evaluated and compared with 38 age-, sex- and body mass index (BMI)-matched controls (CS). RESULTS: AD had ACTH and PRA higher and DHEAS lower (p<0.0005) than CS. Mean waist was higher (p<0.05) in AD than in CS. Although no differences were found for mean gluco-lipids levels, a higher percentage of AD compared to CS were IGT (8 vs 0%), hypercholesterolemic (18 vs 8%), and hypertriglyceridemic (18 vs 8%); none of the AD and CS showed either HDL<40 mg/dl or LDL>190 mg/dl. At the multiple regression analysis, in both AD and CS, BMI was the best predictor of 2-h glucose and age of total and LDL cholesterol; in AD, no significant correlation was found between the above mentioned metabolic parameters and either hormone levels or disease duration. In both AD and CS 24-h blood pressure and IMT were normal. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows a higher prevalence of central adiposity, impaired glucose tolerance and dyslipidemia in AD patients.

Cortistatin-8, a synthetic cortistatin-derived ghrelin receptor ligand, does not modify the endocrine responses to acylated ghrelin or hexarelin in humans.

Cortistatin (CST), a neuropeptide with high structural homology with somatostatin (SST), binds all SST receptor (SST-R) subtypes but, unlike SST, also shows high binding affinity to ghrelin receptor (GHS-R1a). CST exerts the same endocrine activities of SST in humans, suggesting that the activation of the SST-R might mask the potential interaction with ghrelin system. CST-8, a synthetic CST-analogue devoid of any binding affinity to SST-R but capable to bind the GHS-R1a, has been reported able to exert antagonistic effects on ghrelin actions either in vitro or in vivo in animals. We studied the effects of CST-8 (2.0 microg/kg i.v. as a bolus or 2.0 microg/kg/h i.v. as infusion) on both spontaneous and ghrelin- or hexarelin- (1.0 microg/kg i.v. as bolus) stimulated GH, PRL, ACTH and cortisol secretion in 6 normal volunteers. During saline, no change occurred in GH and PRL levels while a spontaneous ACTH and cortisol decrease was observed. As expected, both ghrelin and hexarelin stimulated GH, PRL, ACTH and cortisol secretion (p<0.05). CST-8, administered either as bolus or as continuous infusion, did not modify both spontaneous and ghrelin- or hexarelin-stimulated GH, PRL, ACTH and cortisol secretion. In conclusion, CST-8 seems devoid of any modulatory action on either spontaneous or ghrelin-stimulated somatotroph, lactotroph and corticotroph secretion in humans in vivo. These negative results do not per se exclude that, even at these doses, CST-8 might have some neuroendocrine effects after prolonged treatment or that, at higher doses, may be able to effectively antagonize ghrelin action in humans. However, these data strongly suggest that CST-8 is not a promising candidate as GHS-R1a antagonist for human studies to explore the functional interaction between ghrelin and cortistatin systems.

d-Lys-GHRP-6 does not modify the endocrine response to acylated ghrelin or hexarelin in humans.

Acylated ghrelin exerts numerous endocrine and non-endocrine activities via the GH Secretagogue receptor type 1a (GHS-R1a). D-Lys-GHRP-6 has been widely studied in vitro and in vivo in animal studies as GHS-R1a antagonist; its action in humans has, however, never been tested so far. Aim of our study was to verify the antagonistic action of D-Lys-GHRP-6 on the endocrine responses to acylated ghrelin and hexarelin, a peptidyl synthetic GHS, in humans. The effects of different doses of D-Lys-GHRP-6 (2.0microg/kg iv as bolus or 2.0microg/kg/h iv as infusion) on both spontaneous and acylated ghrelin- or hexarelin (1.0microg/kg iv as bolus) -stimulated GH, PRL, ACTH and cortisol levels were studied in six normal volunteers (age [mean+/-SEM]: 25.4+/-1.2yr; BMI: 22.3+/-1.0kg/m(2)). The effects of D-Lys-GHRP-6 (2.0microg/kg iv as bolus+4.0microg/kg/h iv) on the GH response to 0.25microg/kg iv as bolus acylated ghrelin was also studied. During saline, spontaneous ACTH and cortisol decrease was observed while non changes occurred in GH and PRL levels. Acylated ghrelin and hexarelin stimulated (p<0.05) GH, PRL, ACTH and cortisol secretions. D-Lys-GHRP-6 administered either as bolus or a continuous infusion did not modify both spontaneous and acylated ghrelin- or hexarelin-stimulated GH, PRL, ACTH and cortisol secretion. D-Lys-GHRP-6 did not modify even the GH response to 0.25microg/kg iv acylated ghrelin. In conclusion, D-Lys-GHRP-6 does not affect the neuroendocrine response to both ghrelin and hexarelin. These findings question D-Lys-GHRP-6 as an effective GHS-R1a antagonist for human studies.

Ankle brachial pressure index usefulness as predictor factor for coronary heart disease in diabetic patients.

Ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI) is a non-invasive marker of atherosclerosis, helpful to identify subjects at high-risk for coronary heart disease (CHD) among large populations with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. The diagnostic role of ABPI has been also recognized in patients with diabetes. In the present study, the role of an ABPI score < 0.90 in predicting CHD has been evaluated in a large series of patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus and compared to other known CVD risk factors. Nine hundred and sixty-nine (mean age was 66.1 yr) consecutive patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus were evaluated. The patients were followed-up for 18.3+/-5.2 months (range 12- 24) and all events of CHD, defined as myocardial infarction, unstable and resting angina or coronary atherosclerosis at the instrumental investigation (at the coronary angiography and/or perfusion stress testing) were recorded. A rate of 17.5% of CHD events were recorded in diabetic population during the follow-up period. The relative risk of CHD was significantly increased for male patients [odds ratio (OR): 1.6; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1-2.2], patients with age > or = 66 yr (OR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.3-2.5), body mass index (BMI) > 30 (OR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.1-2.1), waist circumference > 88 cm for females and 102 cm for males (OR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.0-2.1), proteinuria > or = 30 microg per min (OR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.1-2.3), LDL-cholesterol > or = 100 mg/dl (OR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.5-3.0), glycated hemoglobin > 7% (OR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.1-2.3), insulin therapy (OR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.3-2.9), and ABPI < 0.90 (OR: 3.7; 95% CI: 2.2- 6.2). BMI was higher in patients with ABPI < 0.90 than in those with ABPI > or = 0.90 (p<0.05). At the multivariate analysis, ABPI < 0.90 was the best factor independently associated with CHD (p<0.001). APBI < 0.90 is strongly associated to CHD in Type 2 diabetic patients. We recommend to use ABPI in diabetic patients and to carefully monitor diabetic subjects with an ABPI lower than 0.90.

Multi-level and hybrid modelling approaches for systems biology.

During the last decades, high-throughput techniques allowed for the extraction of a huge amount of data from biological systems, unveiling more of their underling complexity. Biological systems encompass a wide range of space and time scales, functioning according to flexible hierarchies of mechanisms making an intertwined and dynamic interplay of regulations. This becomes particularly evident in processes such as ontogenesis, where regulative assets change according to process context and timing, making structural phenotype and architectural complexities emerge from a single cell, through local interactions. The information collected from biological systems are naturally organized according to the functional levels composing the system itself. In systems biology, biological information often comes from overlapping but different scientific domains, each one having its own way of representing phenomena under study. That is, the different parts of the system to be modelled may be described with different formalisms. For a model to have improved accuracy and capability for making a good knowledge base, it is good to comprise different system levels, suitably handling the relative formalisms. Models which are both multi-level and hybrid satisfy both these requirements, making a very useful tool in computational systems biology. This paper reviews some of the main contributions in this field.

Acute effects of acylated ghrelin on salbutamol-induced metabolic actions in humans.

The aim of this study is to describe a potential modulatory effect of acute acylated ghrelin (AG) administration on the glucose, insulin, and free fatty acids (FFA) responses to salbutamol (SALBU). Six healthy young male volunteers underwent the following four testing sessions in random order at least 7 days apart: (a) acute AG administration (1.0 µg/kg i.v. as bolus at 0'); (b) SALBU infusion (0.06 µg/kg/min i.v. from -15' to +45'); (c) SALBU infusion+AG; and (d) isotonic saline infusion. Blood samples for glucose, insulin, and FFA levels were collected every 15 min. As expected, with respect to saline, SALBU infusion induced a remarkable increase in glucose (10.8±5.6 mmol/l×min; P<0.05), insulin (2436.8±556.9 pmol/l×min; P<0.05), and FFA (18.9±4.5 mmol/l×min; P<0.01) levels. A significant increase in glucose (7.4±3.9 mmol/l×min; P<0.05) and FFA levels (10.0±2.8 mmol/l×min; P<0.01) without significant variations in insulin levels were recorded after AG administration. Interestingly, the hyperglycemic effect of AG appeared to be significantly potentiated during SALBU infusion (26.7±4.8 mmol/l×min; P<0.05). On the other hand, the stimulatory effect of SALBU on insulin and FFA was not significantly modified by AG administration. The results of this study show that acute AG administration has a synergic effect with ß2-adrenergic receptor activation by SALBU on blood glucose increase, suggesting that their pharmacological hyperglycemic action takes place via different mechanisms. On the other hand, AG has a negligible influence on the other pharmacological metabolic effects of SALBU infusion.

Effects of ghrelin on the insulin and glycemic responses to glucose, arginine, or free fatty acids load in humans.

Ghrelin possesses central and peripheral endocrine actions including influence on the endocrine pancreatic function. To clarify this latter ghrelin action, in seven normal young subjects [age (mean +/- SEM), 28.3 +/- 3.1 yr; body mass index, 21.9 +/- 0.9 kg/m(2)), we studied insulin and glucose levels after acute ghrelin administration (1.0 microg/kg i.v.) alone or combined with glucose [oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), 100 g orally], arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg i.v.) or free fatty acid (FFA, Intralipid 10%, 250 ml). Ghrelin inhibited (P < 0.05) insulin and increased (P < 0.05) glucose levels. OGTT increased (P < 0.01) glucose and insulin levels. FFA increased (P < 0.05) glucose but did not modify insulin levels. ARG increased (P < 0.05) both insulin and glucose levels. Ghrelin did not modify both glucose and insulin responses to OGTT as well as the FFA-induced increase in glucose levels; however, ghrelin administration was followed by transient insulin decrease also during FFA. Ghrelin blunted (P < 0.05) the insulin response to ARG and enhanced (P < 0.05) the ARG-induced increase in glucose levels. In all, ghrelin induces transient decrease of spontaneous insulin secretion and selectively blunts the insulin response to ARG but not to oral glucose load. On the other hand, ghrelin raises basal glucose levels and enhances the hyperglycemic effect of ARG but not that of OGTT. These findings support the hypothesis that ghrelin exerts modulatory action of insulin secretion and glucose metabolism in humans.

Ghrelin, a natural GH secretagogue produced by the stomach, induces hyperglycemia and reduces insulin secretion in humans.

Ghrelin, a 28 amino acid gastric hormone is a natural ligand of the GH Secretagogue (GHS) receptor (GHS-R) and strongly stimulates GH secretion though, like synthetic GHS, it shows other endocrine and non-endocrine activities. Aim of the present study was to clarify whether ghrelin administration influences insulin and glucose levels in humans. To this goal, we compared the effects of ghrelin, hexarelin, a synthetic GHS, or placebo on insulin and glucose as well as on GH levels in 11 normal young volunteers (age [mean +/- SEM]: 28.5 +/- 3.1 yr; BMI: 22.2 +/- 0.9 Kg/m(2)). Ghrelin induced very marked increase in GH secretion (DeltaAUC(0-180): 5777.1 +/- 812.6 microg/l/h; p < 0.01) which was not modified by placebo. Placebo administration did not modify insulin and glucose levels. On the other hand, ghrelin administration induced a prompt increase in glucose levels (DeltaAUC(0-180): 1343.1 +/- 443.5 mg/dl/h; p < 0.01 vs. saline). Absolute glucose levels at +15' were already higher than those at baseline (93.9 +/- 7.1 mg/dl; p < 0.01) and persisted elevated up to 165' (90.3 +/- 5.8 mg/dl; p < 0.01 vs. 0'). Ghrelin administration was also followed by a decrease in serum insulin levels (DeltaAUC(0-180): -207.1 +/- 70.5 mU/l/h; p < 0.05 vs. saline). Absolute insulin levels were significantly reduced from 30' (11.4 +/- 0.9 mU/l, p < 0.1 vs. 0'), showed the nadir at +45' (10.0 +/- 0.6 mU/l, p < 0.01 vs. 0') and then persisted lower (p < 0.01) than baseline up to +105'. Hexarelin administration did not modify glucose and insulin levels despite its marked GH-releasing effect (DeltaAUC(0-180): 4156.8 +/- 1180.3 microg/l/h; p < 0.01 vs. saline) that was slightly lower (p < 0.05) than that of ghrelin. In conclusion, these findings show that, besides stimulating GH secretion, ghrelin is a gastric hormone possessing metabolic actions such as hyperglycemic effect and lowering effect on insulin secretion in humans, at least after acute administration.

Endocrine activities of ghrelin, a natural growth hormone secretagogue (GHS), in humans: comparison and interactions with hexarelin, a nonnatural peptidyl GHS, and GH-releasing hormone.

An endogenous ligand for the GH secretagogue-receptor (GHS-receptor) has recently been isolated, from both the rat and the human stomach, and named ghrelin. It is a 28-amino-acid peptide showing a unique structure with an n-octanoyl ester at its third serine residue, which is essential for its potent stimulatory activity on somatotroph secretion. In fact, it has been demonstrated that ghrelin specifically stimulates GH secretion from both rat pituitary cells in culture and rats in vivo. The aim of the present study was to test the GH-releasing activity of ghrelin in humans and to compare it with that of GHRH and hexarelin (HEX), a nonnatural peptidyl GHS, which possesses strong GH-releasing activity but also significantly stimulates PRL, ACTH, and cortisol secretion. To clarify the mechanisms of action underlying the GH-releasing activity of ghrelin in humans, its interaction with GHRH and HEX was also studied. Seven normal young volunteers (7 men; 24-32 yr old; body mass index, 20-24 kg/m(2)) were studied. All subjects underwent the administration of ghrelin, HEX, and GHRH-29 (1.0 microg/kg i.v. at 0 min) as well as placebo (2 mL isotonic saline i.v. at 0 min). Six subjects also underwent the combined administration of ghrelin and GHRH or HEX. Blood samples were taken every 15 min from -15 up to +180 min. GH levels were assayed at each time point in all sessions; PRL, ACTH, cortisol, and aldosterone levels were also assayed after administration of ghrelin and/or HEX. Ghrelin administration induced a prompt and marked increase in circulating GH levels (Cmax, mean +/- SEM, 92.1 +/- 16.7 microg/L; area under the curve, 1894.9 +/- 347.8 microg/L.h). The GH response to ghrelin was clearly higher (P < 0.01) than the one recorded after GHRH (26.7 +/- 8.7 microg/L; 619.6 +/- 174.4 microg/L.h) and even significantly higher (P < 0.05) than after HEX (68.4 +/- 14.7 microg/L; 1546.9 +/- 380.0 microg/L x h). Ghrelin administration also induced an increase in PRL, ACTH, and cortisol levels; these responses were higher (P < 0.05) than those elicited by HEX. A significant increase in aldosterone levels was recorded after ghrelin but not after HEX. The endocrine responses to ghrelin were not modified by the coadministration of HEX. On the other hand, the coadministration of ghrelin and GHRH had a real synergistical effect (P < 0.05) on GH secretion (133.6 +/- 22.5 microg/L; 3374.3 +/- 617.3 microg/L x h). In conclusion, ghrelin, a natural ligand of GHS-receptor, exerts a strong stimulatory effect on GH secretion in humans, releasing more GH than GHRH and even more than a nonnatural GHS such as HEX. Ghrelin, as well as HEX, also stimulates lactotroph and corticotroph secretion. Ghrelin shows no interaction with HEX, whereas it has a synergistical effect with GHRH on GH secretion. Thus, ghrelin is a new hormone playing a major role in the control of somatotroph secretion in humans, and its effects are imitated by nonnatural GHS.

Neuroendocrine and metabolic effects of acute ghrelin administration in human obesity.

Ghrelin stimulates appetite and plays a role in the neuroendocrine response to energy balance variations. Ghrelin levels are inversely associated with body mass index (BMI), increased by fasting and decreased by food intake, glucose load, insulin, and somatostatin. Ghrelin levels are reduced in obesity, a condition of hyperinsulinism, reduced GH secretion, and hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis hyperactivity. We studied the endocrine and metabolic response to acute ghrelin administration (1.0 microg/kg i.v.) in nine obese women [OB; BMI (mean +/- SD) 36.3 +/- 2.3 kg/m(2)] and seven normal women (NW; BMI 20.3 +/- 1.7 kg/m(2)). Basal ghrelin levels in NW were higher than in OB (P < 0.05). In NW, ghrelin increased (P < 0.05) GH, prolactin (PRL), ACTH, cortisol, and glucose levels but did not modify insulin. In OB, ghrelin increased (P < 0.01) GH, PRL, ACTH, and cortisol levels. The GH response to ghrelin in OB was 55% lower (P < 0.02) than in NW, whereas the PRL, ACTH, and cortisol responses were similar. In OB, ghrelin increased glucose and reduced insulin (P < 0.05). Thus, obesity shows remarkable reduction of the somatotroph responsiveness to ghrelin, suggesting that ghrelin hyposecretion unlikely explains the impairment of somatotroph function in obesity. On the other hand, in obesity ghrelin shows preserved influence on PRL, ACTH, and insulin secretion as well as in glucose levels.

Endocrine activities of alexamorelin (Ala-His-d-2-methyl-Trp-Ala-Trp-d-Phe-Lys-NH2), a synthetic GH secretagogue, in humans.

OBJECTIVE: Peptidyl and non-peptidyl synthetic GH secretagogues (GHS) possess significant GH-, prolactin (PRL)- and ACTH/cortisol-releasing activity after i.v. and even p.o. administration, acting via specific hypothalamo-pituitary receptors in both animals and humans. The hexapeptide hexarelin (HEX) is a paradigmatic GHS whose activities have been widely studied in humans. The heptapeptide Ala-His-d-2-methyl-Trp-Ala-Trp-d-Phe-Lys-NH(2) (alexamorelin, ALEX) is a new synthetic molecule which inhibits GHS binding in vitro, but its endocrine activity has never been studied in humans. DESIGN: In six young adults we studied the effects of 1.0 and 2.0 microgram/kg i.v. ALEX or HEX on GH, PRL, ACTH, cortisol and aldosterone levels and those of 20mg p.o. ( approximately 300 microgram/kg) on GH levels. RESULTS: Basal GH, PRL, ACTH, cortisol and aldosterone levels in all testing sessions were similar. ALEX and HEX (1.0 and 2.0 microgram/kg i.v.) induced the same dose-dependent increase of GH and PRL levels. Both ALEX and HEX induced a dose-dependent increase of ACTH and cortisol levels. The ACTH and cortisol responses to the highest ALEX dose were significantly higher than those after HEX. Aldosterone levels significantly increased after both i.v. ALEX doses, but not after HEX. The GH response to 20mg p.o. ALEX was higher, though not significantly, than that to the same HEX dose. CONCLUSION: ALEX, a new GHS, shows the same GH-releasing activity as HEX. On the other hand, ALEX seems endowed with an ACTH-releasing activity more marked than that of HEX; this evidence could explain the significant increase of aldosterone levels after its i.v. administration.

Patients with dilated cardiomyopathy show reduction of the somatotroph responsiveness to GHRH both alone and combined with arginine.

OBJECTIVE: Altered function of the GH/IGF-I axis in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) has been reported. In fact, DCM patients show reduction of IGF-I levels, which could reflect slight peripheral GH resistance or, alternatively, reduced somatotroph secretion. Spontaneous GH secretion has been reported to be altered by some but not by other authors, whereas the GH response to GHRH, but not that to GH-releasing peptides, seems reduced in DCM patients. On the other hand, it is well known that the GH response to GHRH in humans is markedly potentiated by arginine (ARG), which probably acts via inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release; in fact the GHRH+ARG test is known as one of the most reliable to evaluate the maximal secretory capacity of somatotroph cells. METHODS: In order to further clarify the somatotroph function in DCM, in well-nourished patients with DCM (34 male, 4 female; age (mean+/-s.e. m.) 57.8+/-1.1 years; body mass index (BMI) 24.6+/-0.6kg/m(2); left ventricular ejection fraction 23.2+/-1.6%; New York Heart Association classification I/1, II/17, III/18, IV/2) we studied the GH response to GHRH (1.0 microgram/kg i.v.) alone or combined with ARG (0.5g/kg i.v.). The results in DCM patients were compared with those in age-matched control subjects (CS) (39 male, 7 female; age 58.9+/-1.0 years; BMI 23.2+/-0.3kg/m(2)). RESULTS: Mean IGF-I levels in DCM patients were lower than in CS (144.3+/-6.9 vs 175.1+/-8. 4 microgram/l, P<0.05) whereas basal GH levels were similar in both groups (1.7+/-0.3 vs 1.7+/-0.3 microgram/l). The GH response to GHRH in DCM patients was lower (P<0.05) than that in CS (GH peak 6.5+/-1.2 vs 10.7+/-2.1 microgram/l). In both groups the GH response to GHRH+ARG was higher (P<0.001) than that to GHRH alone. However, the GH response to GHRH+ARG in DCM patients remained clearly lower (P<0.01) than that in CS (18.3+/-3.2 vs 34.1+/-4.6 microgram/l). The GH response to GHRH alone and combined with ARG was not associated with the severity of the disease. CONCLUSION: DCM patients show blunted GH responses to GHRH both alone and combined with ARG. Evidence that ARG does not restore the GH response to GHRH in DCM patients makes it unlikely that the somatotroph hyporesponsiveness to the neurohormone reflects hyperactivity of hypothalamic somatostatinergic neurons.

GH-independent cardiotropic activities of hexarelin in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction due to dilated and ischemic cardiomyopathy.

AIM: To investigate acute cardiotropic activities of hexarelin in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction due to ischemic (iCMP) and dilated cardiomyopathy (dCMP). METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied the effect of intravenous hexarelin administration on growth hormone (GH) levels and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) evaluated by radionuclide angiography in eight patients with dCMP (age 53.0+/-2.8, LVEF 16.7+/-2.1%) and five patients with iCMP (age 52.0+/-2.8 years, LVEF 22.6+/-2.1). Results were compared with a group of seven normal subjects (age 37.4+/-3.4 years, LVEF 64.0+/-1.5%) and seven patients with severe growth-hormone deficiency (GHD; age 42.0+/-4.4 years, LVEF 50.0+/-1.9%) previously studied with the same methodology. In dCMP and iCMP patients hexarelin induced a similar significant (P<0.05) increase in GH levels. In iCMP patients hexarelin induced a LVEF increase (peak LVEF 26.2+/-2.5%, P<0.05) as observed in normals and GHD, while in dCMP LVEF was unchanged (peak LVEF 17.7+/-1.7, P=NS). In all groups other hemodynamic parameters were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Acute hexarelin administration increases LVEF in iCMP patients (as in normals and GHD) but not in dCMP patients in spite of a similar GH releasing effect and basal LVEF. A possible explanation of the positive inotropic effect of hexarelin in iCMP could be a direct stimulation on viable myocardium or myocardial contractile reserve.