Frailty Scores Impact the Outcomes of Urgent Carotid Interventions in Acute Stroke Patients: A Comprehensive Analysis of Risk and Prognosis.

INTRODUCTION: Carotid artery disease is an important cause of ischemic strokes. Patient selection for urgent carotid interventions (ie. carotid endarterectomy [uCEA] and carotid artery stenting [uCAS]) performed within 2 weeks of event during index hospitalization is primarily based on overall health and risk profile. Identifying high-risk patients remains a challenge. Frailty, a decline in function related to aging, has emerged as an important factor in the treatment of the elderly population. This study aimed to design a quantitative risk score based on frailty for patients undergoing uCEA and uCAS following an acute stroke. METHODS: A total of 307 acute stroke patients treated with uCEA or uCAS were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Frailty scores were calculated using the Hospital Frailty Risk Index based on ICD-10 codes. Stroke-specific risk categories were created based on the incidence of stroke, death, and myocardial infarction (MI) associated with frailty scores. Primary endpoints included 30-day stroke, death, and MI, while the secondary endpoint was discharge modified Rankin scale (mRS). Statistical analyses were performed using SAS software. RESULTS: The average age was 65.9 years; hypertension, history of tobacco use, and hyperlipidemia were the most common comorbidities. The median Hospital Frailty Risk Score was 27, the majority of patients in this study were in the intermediate and high risk frailty groups (50.5% and 41.7%, respectively). uCAS patients had a higher median presenting NIHSS (8 vs. 2, p<0.001) and shorter median time to intervention compared to uCEA patients (1 vs. 3 days, p=<0.001). The 30-day composite stroke, death, and MI rate was 8.1%, with higher rates observed in patients with frailty scores >30 (11.7%) and uCAS (12.2%). Hemorrhagic conversion and death were more common in uCAS patients. Functional independence (mRS 0-2) was observed in uCEA patients after minor stroke and in uCAS patients after minor or moderate stroke. Patients with high-risk frailty score (>30) presenting with a moderate stroke were more likely to be functionally dependent (mRS>2) on discharge (67% vs 41.3%, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Frailty is a valuable prognosticative tool for clinical outcomes in patients undergoing urgent carotid interventions following an acute stroke. Higher frailty scores were associated with increased stroke, death, and MI rates. Frailty also influenced functional dependence at discharge, particularly in patients with moderate stroke. These findings highlight the importance of considering frailty in the decision-making process for carotid interventions. Further research is needed to validate these findings and explore interventions to mitigate the impact of frailty on outcomes.

Safety and Feasibility of Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stent-Assisted Revascularization within 48 Hours after Symptoms Onset.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of carotid artery stenting (CAS) performed in the hyperacute period. METHODS: We analyzed a retrospective database of CAS patients from our center. We included patients with symptomatic isolated ipsilateral extracranial carotid stenosis and acute tandem occlusions who underwent CAS. Hyperacute CAS (HCAS) and acute CAS (ACAS) groups were defined as CAS within 48 hours and >48 hours to 14 days from symptoms onset, respectively. The primary outcome was a composite of any stroke, myocardial infarction, or death at 3 months of follow-up. Secondary outcomes were periprocedural complications and restenosis or occlusion rates. RESULTS: We included 97 patients, 39 with HCAS and 58 with ACAS. There was no significant difference between groups for the primary outcome (HCAS 3.3% vs. ACAS 6.1%; p = 1). There were no differences in the rate of perioperative complications between groups although a trend was observed (HCAS 15.3% vs. ACAS 3.4%; p = .057). The rate of restenosis or occlusion between groups (HCAS 8.1% vs. ACAS 9,1%; log-rank test p = .8) was similar with a median time of follow-up of 13.7 months. CONCLUSION: Based on this study, CAS may be feasible in the hyperacute period. However, there are potential higher rates of perioperative complications in the hyperacute group, primarily occurring in MT patients with acute tandem occlusion. A larger multicenter study may be needed to further corroborate our findings.

Duration of blood flow reversal during transcarotid artery revascularization does not affect outcome.

OBJECTIVE: Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) has become an increasingly popular alternative for the treatment of carotid bifurcation stenosis. TCAR employs carotid blood flow reversal through an ex vivo common carotid artery to femoral vein shunt for neuroprotection during the placement and angioplasty of the carotid artery stent. There is a lack of data regarding an association between the duration of flow reversal and neurologic complications or other adverse events. We analyzed TCAR flow reversal time in relation to major adverse events. METHODS: There were 307 patients who underwent TCAR at four high-volume academic institutions. Patients were separated on the basis of the duration of carotid flow reversal as follows: group I, ≤8 minutes (n = 138); group II, 9-13 minutes (n = 105); group III, 14-20 minutes (n = 42); and group IV, >20 minutes (n = 22). Adverse events including stroke (assessed by a National Institute of Health Stroke Scale-certified examiner), myocardial infarction (MI), and death at discharge and 30 days were collected in all patients and were compared between groups using one-way analysis of variance and χ2 analysis. RESULTS: There were four strokes in the total cohort, yielding an overall stroke rate of 1.3%. All strokes were minor in nature; two were ipsilateral and two were contralateral. All patients demonstrated full recovery at 30 days. We found no significant difference in the stroke rate between any of the groups: I, 1.5% (2/138); II, 1.9% (2/105); III, 0% (0/42); and IV, 0% (0/22; P = .76). The four strokes occurred in patients with flow reversal time of 6, 7, 11, and 12 minutes. There was also no difference in the 30-day composite stroke/death or stroke/death/MI rates among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The length of flow reversal during TCAR does not affect rates of stroke, MI, or death. These data suggest that operators should focus on the technical aspects of the procedure during flow reversal rather than on its duration.

In-stent restenosis associated with dual-layer Roadsaver carotid artery stent: a retrospective single-center study.

AIM: To evaluate the incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) at 12-month follow-up, in patients treated with new dual-layer Roadsaver (Terumo Corp, Tokyo, Japan) carotid artery stent (CAS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients underwent CAS and received a Roadsaver. Neurological examination was performed in all patients. Carotid stenosis was revealed by Doppler ultrasound (DUS) and multidetector CT (MDCT) scan. Four patients presented a peak systolic velocity (PSV) between 130 and 150 cm/s, six a PSV between 150 and 180 cm/s, and three a PSV > 180 cm/s. MDCT gave further anatomic information. Direct stenting was performed in 11 (84.6%) cases, whereas in 2 (15.4%) cases predilatation was required. In all cases postdilatation was performed. Technical and clinical success and safety were evaluated. Stent patency was evaluated during the 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in all cases. In three patients a nonsignificant residual stenosis < 30% has been reported. No major complications during or after the procedure occurred. One patient (7.7%) showed a transitory bradycardia during angioplasty. One (7.7%) local bleeding at the puncture site treated conservatively occurred. All the neurological examinations performed 24 h and 30 days after the procedure were negative. No significant ISR was registered. In 2 patients, < 30% ISR was revealed at DUS performed after 6 months and confirmed at 12 months. In both patients CEUS and MDCT denied the presence of significant stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Roadsaver stent seems to be durable. Further studies with longer-term outcome are necessary to confirm our results.

[Nursing Care of Patients With Carotid Artery Stenosis Who Receive Carotid Artery Stent].

Atherosclerosis, a major cause of carotid artery stenosis, has a high correlation to stroke, which may induce transient ischemic attack (TIA) and/or permanent brain damage. The main treatment of carotid artery stenosis includes medication, carotid endarterectomy (CEA), and carotid artery stenting (CAS). However, when artery stenosis becomes severe, CEA or CAS is the most-often recommended intervention. CAS, a type of revascularization, is considered less invasive than CEA and is associated with a higher successful rate. CAS not only treats carotid stenosis effectively and reduces the incidence of stroke and myocardial infarction but also may increase the survival rate. Because CAS may lead to in-stent restenosis, an eluting stent has been developed to prevent this adverse event. However, the effectiveness of the eluting stent has yet to be adequately verified. As patients who receive CAS remain at risk of recurrent stroke, intravascular restenosis, TIA, and mortality, post-procedure medical and nursing care for this population must be appropriately applied in order to maximize the rate of long-term success. Therefore, we recommend that clinical physicians and nurses regularly evaluate and monitor post-CAS patients in order to prevent complications. Moreover, they should educate patients before discharge on post-CAS wound care and medicine-taking regimens as well as on the importance of smoking cessation, controlling blood sugar and blood pressure, exercising regularly, reducing body weight, maintaining a healthy diet, and controlling the risk factors of atherosclerosis in order to prevent the recurrence of complications.

Clinical Results and Mechanical Properties of the Carotid CGUARD Double-Layered Embolic Prevention Stent.

PURPOSE: To report early clinical outcomes with a novel double-layer stent for the internal carotid artery (ICA) and the in vitro investigation of the stent's mechanical properties. METHODS: A prospective single-center study enrolled 30 consecutive patients (mean age 73.1±6.3 years; 21 men) with symptomatic (n=25) or high-grade (n=5) ICA stenosis treated with the new double-layer carotid CGUARD Embolic Prevention System (EPS) stent, which has an inner open-cell nitinol design with an outer closed-cell polyethylene terephthalate layer. The average stenosis of the treated arteries was 84.1%±7.9% with a mean lesion length of 16.6±2.1 mm. In the laboratory, 8×40-mm stents where tested in vitro with respect to their radial force during expansion, the bending stiffness of the stent system and the expanded stent, as well as the collapse pressure in a thin and flexible sheath. The wall adaptation was assessed using fluoroscopy after stent release in step and curved vessel models. RESULTS: The stent was successfully implanted in all patients. No peri- or postprocedural complications occurred; no minor or major stroke was observed in the 6-month follow-up. The bending stiffness of the expanded stent was 63.1 N·mm2 and (not unexpectedly) was clearly lower than that of the stent system (601.5 N·mm2). The normalized radial force during expansion of the stent to 7.0 mm, consistent with in vivo sizing, was relatively high (0.056 N/mm), which correlates well with the collapse pressure of 0.17 bars. Vessel wall adaptation was harmonic and caused no straightening of the vessel after clinical application. CONCLUSION: Because of its structure, the novel CGUARD EPS stent is characterized by a high flexibility combined with a high radial force and very good plaque coverage. These first clinical results demonstrate a very safe implantation behavior without any stroke up to 6 months after the procedure.

The circle of Willis predicts the antihypertensive effects of carotid artery stenting.

OBJECTIVE Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has antihypertensive effects, but the durability and degree of this response remain variable. The authors propose that this clinical variability is a function of the presence or absence of a complete circle of Willis (COW). Incomplete COWs perfuse through a higher-resistance pial collateral pathway, and therefore patients may require a higher mean arterial pressure (MAP). Carotid artery revascularization in these patients would reduce the end-organ collateral demand that has been hypothesized to drive the MAP response. METHODS Using a retrospective, nonrandomized within-subject case-control design, the authors compared the postoperative effects of CAS in patients with and without a complete COW by using changes in MAP and antihypertensive medication as end points. They recorded MAP and antihypertensive medications 3 months prior to surgery, preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at the 3-month follow-up. RESULTS Data were collected from 64 consecutive patients undergoing CAS. Patients without a complete COW (25%) were more likely to demonstrate a decrease in BP response to stenting (i.e., a drop in MAP of 10 mm Hg and/or a reduction or cessation of BP medications at 3 months postoperatively). Of the patients in the incomplete COW cohort, 75% had this outcome, whereas of those in the complete COW cohort, only 41% had it (p < 0.041). These findings remained statistically significant in a logistic regression analysis for possible confounders (p < 0.024). A receiver operating curve analysis of preoperative data indicated that a MAP > 96.3 mm Hg was 55.5% sensitive and 57.4% specific for predicting a complete COW and that patients with a MAP > 96.3 mm Hg were more likely to demonstrate a good MAP decrease following CAS (p < 0.0092). CONCLUSIONS CAS is associated with a significant decrease in MAP and/or a reduction/cessation in BP medications in patients in whom a complete COW is absent.

Carotid Artery Stenting in a Patient With a Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the safety and feasibility of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in a patient with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD). CASE REPORT: A 54-year-old woman with a LVAD was referred for a 90% stenosis of the right internal carotid artery (ICA). The patient was offered CAS, and oral anticoagulant was not discontinued in the periprocedural period. Because of absent arterial pulses, percutaneous transfemoral access was obtained under ultrasound guidance. Particular attention was paid to cannulation of the innominate artery; a 7-F guiding catheter was advanced from the descending aorta into the innominate artery under road-mapping, avoiding maneuvers in the ascending aorta where the outflow Dacron graft of the LVAD was anastomosed. To avoid cerebral flow modifications, the Angioguard RX was used as the cerebral protection device rather than other devices such as the flow reversal or flow-clamping systems. At this point, CAS was performed in a standard fashion using the 7×30-mm Precise ProRX stent. The computed tomography angiogram at 6 months showed patency of the stented right ICA. CONCLUSION: With adequate planning, CAS appears feasible in patients with a LVAD.

Carotid Artery Stenting With Proximal Embolic Protection via a Transradial or Transbrachial Approach: Pushing the Boundaries of the Technique While Maintaining Safety and Efficacy.

PURPOSE: To compare the feasibility and safety of proximal cerebral protection to a distal filter during carotid artery stenting (CAS) via a transbrachial (TB) or transradial (TR) approach. METHODS: Among 856 patients who underwent CAS between January 2007 and July 2015, 214 (25%) patients (mean age 72±8 years; 154 men) had the procedure via a TR (n=154) or TB (n=60) approach with either Mo.MA proximal protection (n=61) or distal filter protection (n=153). The Mo.MA group (mean age 73±7 years; 54 men) had significantly more men and more severe stenosis than the filter group (mean age 71±8 years; 100 men). Stent type and CAS technique were left to operator discretion. Heparin and a dedicated closure device or bivalirudin and manual compression were used in TR and TB accesses, respectively. Technical and procedure success, crossover to femoral artery, 30-day major adverse cardiovascular/cerebrovascular events (MACCE; death, all strokes, and myocardial infarction), vascular complications, and radiation exposure were compared between groups. RESULTS: Crossover to a femoral approach was required in 1/61 (1.6%) Mo.MA patient vs 11/153 (7.1%) filter patients mainly due to technical difficulty in engaging the target vessel. Five Mo.MA patients developed acute intolerance to proximal occlusion; 4 were successfully shifted to filter protection. A TR patient was shifted to filter because the Mo.MA system was too short. CAS was technically successful in the remaining 55 (90%) Mo.MA patients and 142 (93%) filter patients. The MACCE rate was 0% in the Mo.MA patients and 2.8% in the filter group (p=0.18). Radiation exposure was similar between groups. Major vascular complications occurred in 1/61 (1.6%) and in 3/153 (1.96%) patients in the Mo.MA and filter groups (p=0.18), respectively, and were confined to the TB approach in the early part of the learning curve. Chronic radial artery occlusion was detected by Doppler ultrasound in 2/30 (6.6%) Mo.MA patients and in 4/124 (3.2%) filter patients by clinical assessment (p=0.25) at 8.1±7.5-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: CAS with proximal protection via a TR or TB approach is a feasible, safe, and effective technique with a low rate of vascular complications.

Initial clinical experience with the micromesh Roadsaver carotid artery stent for the treatment of patients with symptomatic carotid artery disease.

PURPOSE: To assess the effectiveness, technical aspects, handling, and safety of the micromesh Roadsaver Carotid Artery Stent in the treatment of atherosclerotic carotid artery stenosis and tandem lesions in ischemic stroke patients. METHODS: Seven patients (5 men; mean age 75±11.4 years, range 53-86) suffering from symptomatic internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis (mean 76% diameter reduction) were treated with the dual layer closed-cell stent without embolic protection. Postdilation was performed in 6 of 7 patients. Two patients were treated in the context of ischemic stroke and concurrent middle cerebral artery occlusion. Mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at admission was 12.8±5. RESULTS: All devices were deployed satisfactorily. One wall-adherent thromboembolus in a proximal ICA was covered with the Roadsaver stent in a tandem lesion setting. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) declined from 3.7±0.7 to 2.4±0.8 in hospital, showing an improvement in clinical symptoms. No complications were detected during or after the procedure. The 30-day mRS was 1.7±1.1. At 6 months, ultrasound examination demonstrated patency of stents and the external carotid arteries. CONCLUSION: The Roadsaver double layer micromesh stent seems to be safe and effective in the treatment of extracranial ICA stenosis and in the context of tandem lesions in ischemic stroke. Further studies with larger populations are warranted.

Plaque protrusion detected by intravascular ultrasound during carotid artery stenting.

BACKGROUND: Stroke is a major complication of carotid artery stenting (CAS) that can occur during the procedure and for up to 30 days after the procedure in the late phase. Although the cause of late stroke after CAS is unknown, plaque protrusion may be one of the potential causes. This study aims to assess the rate of plaque protrusion during CAS by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). METHODS: We performed 77 consecutive CAS procedures using IVUS between May 2008 and December 2012. The rate of plaque protrusion was assessed at the end of the procedure using IVUS and angiography. RESULTS: Mean age of patients was 72.5 ± 7.5 years. Sixty-eight patients were male and 42 had diabetes mellitus. In all, 65 PRECISE stents and 12 Carotid Wall stents were used. All cases were distally protected with filter devices. Six plaque protrusions (7.8%) through the stent struts were detected by IVUS but only 2 (2.6%) by angiography. A predictor of plaque protrusion was preprocedural severe stenosis with flow delay. Additional postdilations (n = 6) and stent-in-stent implantations (n = 4) were performed to correct the plaque protrusions. No remaining plaque protrusion was observed in the final IVUS. Overall stroke rate was 2.6% (major 0%, minor 2.6%), and these occurred in the catheterization laboratory, but no late stroke was observed at 30 days after procedure. CONCLUSIONS: IVUS can detect plaque protrusion better than angiography. Because adequate management of plaque protrusion may reduce stroke complications, IVUS usage is worth considering.

Natural history of antiplatelet nonresponders undergoing carotid artery stenting.

OBJECTIVE: Routine antiplatelet responsiveness testing for patients undergoing carotid artery stenting procedures is not performed at most endovascular centers and remains a topic of controversy within the neurointerventional community. The objective of this study was to determine if nonresponsiveness to acetylsalicylic acid or clopidogrel was associated with the development of symptomatic thromboembolic events in patients undergoing carotid stenting procedures. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted at the Foothills Medical Centre in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, from August 2019 to July 2021. Patients undergoing carotid artery stenting procedures and who were receiving dual antiplatelet therapy were enrolled in the study. Responsiveness to the antiplatelet medications was determined through whole blood impedance aggregometry. The primary outcome was development of a symptomatic thromboembolic event within 90 days after the procedure. The treating physicians were blinded to the aggregometry results for the duration of the study. RESULTS: One hundred two procedures were performed in 100 patients. Eight thromboembolic events (8%) occurred during the study. Age (p = 0.03) and nonresponsiveness to clopidogrel (p = 0.003) were associated with the development of thromboembolic events. The multivariable model showed that clopidogrel nonresponsiveness was independently associated with the development of a thromboembolic event (adjusted OR 6.14, 95% CI 1.25-30.11, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that patients who were identified as clopidogrel nonresponders, using whole blood impedance aggregometry, were at an increased risk of developing thromboembolic events. Larger studies are needed to assess the utility of routine platelet function testing prior to carotid artery stenting procedures.

Intraoperative fusion imaging during transcarotid artery revascularization.

Background: Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) with reverse-flow neuroprotection has emerged as an alternative to transfemoral carotid artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy. However, it requires fluoroscopic guidance, exposing the patient and surgeon to radiation. Although fusion-guided endovascular aneurysm repair has been demonstrated to significantly decrease this radiation risk, not much is known about similar outcomes for TCAR. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcomes at a single institution using fusion-guided imaging during TCAR compared with regional TCAR cases in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) registry without fusion imaging. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of data collected from all patients undergoing TCAR with fusion-guided imaging (TCAR-F) at our hospital and patients undergoing TCAR alone within the VQI database. The primary outcomes included the total operative time, dose area product, fluoroscopy time, contrast usage, and flow-reversal time. The demographics and preoperative risk factors were also assessed in both groups. Continuous outcomes were compared using the Welch t test. Categorical outcomes were compared using the Fisher exact test. Results: A total of 30 TCAR-F cases (January 2019 to May 2022) at our institution were compared against the regional VQI dataset (n = 2535). The TCAR-F cases had a lower dose area product (5.67 vs 93.1 Gy cm2; P < .0001), shorter fluoroscopy time (8.07 vs 16.4 minutes; P < .0001), and less contrast usage (13.49 vs 76.7 mL; P < .0001) compared with the regional averages of the same. The TCAR-F cases had a longer total operative time (117.3 vs 80.9 minutes; P < .0001) and flow-reversal time (14.4 vs 11.7 minutes; P = .025) compared with the regional cases. Conclusions: The results from this pilot study comparing TCAR-F patients at a single institution with VQI regional TCAR patients suggest that TCAR-F cases use less radiation and contrast compared with TCAR without fusion imaging. Fusion-guided imaging might provide radiation protection to both patients and surgeons and decrease contrast usage for the patient.

Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) stenting or angioplasty for intracranial carotid artery stenosis: Case series and novel application.

BACKGROUND: Carotid artery stenting is associated with a higher rate of stroke compared to carotid endarterectomy (CEA). This is likely due to procedural emboli resulting from plaque disruption. The transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) method aims to reduce the stroke rate by flow-reversal. TCAR, which has yet to be utilized for intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD), may be particularly valuable given the lack of surgical treatment options for intracranial arterial stenosis. OBJECTIVE: Presented here are five cases of angioplasty or stenting that demonstrate the feasibility of TCAR for intracranial Internal Carotid Artery (ICA) stenosis treatment. METHODS: Five cases were reviewed retrospectively and summarized using PROCESS and CARE guidelines. RESULTS: All patients who underwent intervention between the petrous and ophthalmic segment of the ICA had no new neurologic deficit nor detected embolic stroke. One patient experienced an asymptomatic 5 mm hemorrhage on postoperative routine Computed Tomography (CT) head imaging. CONCLUSIONS: This highlights a new method for treating intracranial ICA stenosis with a potentially reduced stroke risk. Given the historically higher stroke rates for cervical ICA stenting compared to carotid artery endarterectomy, this method may improve the previously higher stroke rates in endovascular carotid artery treatment, compared to CEA. Although this series is small, it illustrates a novel use for a rising technique that should be further evaluated in a larger study to validate its efficacy as a new treatment modality for surgically inaccessible intracranial disease.

Transcarotid artery revascularization for carotid pseudoaneurysm and patch degeneration after carotid endarterectomy.

An 86-year-old man with a history of right internal carotid artery occlusion and two remote left carotid endarterectomies presented with a contained posterior rupture of a carotid pseudoaneurysm. The infectious workup was negative. He underwent transcarotid artery revascularization, including external carotid artery coil embolization and exclusion of the carotid aneurysm with a self-expandable stent graft. He was discharged home on postoperative day 1 with his home antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy. The 3-month postoperative imaging study demonstrated a widely patent carotid stent without an endoleak. Transcarotid artery revascularization is a viable alternative to open repair or transfemoral stenting for carotid artery aneurysms.

Interventions in Carotid Artery Surgery: An Overview of Current Management and Future Implications.

Atherosclerotic carotid artery disease has been well studied over the last half-century by multiple randomized controlled trials attempting to elucidate the appropriate modality of therapy for this disease process. Surgical techniques have evolved from carotid artery endarterectomy and transfemoral carotid artery stenting to the development of hybrid techniques in transcarotid artery revascularization. In this article, the authors provide a review of the available literature regarding operative and medical management of carotid artery disease.

Hybrid surgery recanalization for high-level chronic internal carotid artery occlusion.

Objective: Although endovascular recanalization is considered a more effective treatment for chronic internal carotid artery occlusion (CICAO), the success rate of complex CICAO remains inadequate. We present hybrid surgery (carotid endarterectomy combined with carotid stenting) for complex CICAO and explore the influential factors and effects of hybrid surgery recanalization. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical, imaging, and follow-up data of 22 patients with complex CICAO treated by hybrid surgery at the Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University from December 2016 to December 2020. We also summarize the technical points related to hybrid surgery recanalization. Results: A total of 22 patients with complex CICAO underwent hybrid surgery recanalization. There were no postoperative deaths in all patients after hybrid surgery recanalization. Nineteen patients successfully underwent recanalization with a success rate of 86.4% and three cases with a failure rate of 13.6%. Patients were divided into success and failure groups. Significantly different radiographic classification of lesions was observed between the success group and the failure group (P = 0.019). The rates of CICAO with reverse ophthalmic artery blood flow in the internal carotid artery (ICA) preoperatively were 94.7% in the success group and 33.3% in the failure group (P = 0.038). Three cases of hybrid surgery recanalization failure were transferred for EC-IC bypass and had good neurological recovery. Postoperative average KPS scores of the 19 patients were improved compared to the preoperative ones (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Hybrid surgery for complex CICAO is safe and effective with a high recanalization rate. The recanalization rate is related to whether the occluded segment surpasses the ophthalmic artery.

Hypoperfusion cerebral infarction after carotid artery stenting: A case report.

Carotid artery stent implantation (CAS) plays an important role in preventing cerebral infarction associated with carotid stenosis. The postoperative complications of CAS include cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS), cerebral infarction, vascular injury, carotid sinus reaction, and stent restenosis. Hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) is a serious complication that arises after the performance of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or CAS and is characterized by high blood pressure, headache, epilepsy, and focal neurological deficit. Therefore, it is very important to evaluate and diagnose CHS. Cerebral infarction after CAS is often caused by distal embolism due to the shedding of microemboli. With the application of distal brain protection devices, the risk of distal embolism is significantly reduced. In this study, we report a rare case of hypoperfusion cerebral infarction after carotid artery stenting in a patient with severe carotid stenosis complicated with contralateral common carotid artery occlusion.

Carotid endarterectomy with stent removal for recurring in-stent restenosis: A case report and literature review.

Background: Percutaneous transcatheter angioplasty (PTA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) are often performed repeatedly for in-stent restenosis (ISR) after CAS. Only a few reports describe the treatment for repeated ISR. Furthermore, only a few reports describe carotid endarterectomy (CEA) after CAS; thus, the evidence for this procedure is insufficient. Case Description: Herein, we describe a case in which CEA with stent removal was performed in a patient with repeated ISR after CAS. A 78-year-old man presented with dysarthria and slight left limb weakness. CAS was performed for the right internal carotid artery stenosis. ISR occurred again and PTA and stenting were performed. After the second CAS, ISR occurred again. CEA with stent removal was performed. After the CEA with stent removal, the patient experienced no restenosis or other complications. Conclusion: CEA with stent removal can be a good option for treating repeated ISR after CAS.