Utility of end-tidal carbon dioxide to guide resuscitation termination in prolonged out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if the change in end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) over time has improved discriminatory value for determining resuscitation futility compared to a single ETCO2 value in prolonged, refractory non-shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of adult refractory non-shockable, non-traumatic OHCA patients in the Portland Cardiac Arrest Epidemiologic Registry (PDX Epistry) from 2018 to 2021. We defined refractory non-shockable OHCA cases as patients with lack of a shockable rhythm at any time or return of spontaneous circulation at any time prior to 30-min of on-scene resuscitation. We abstracted ETCO2 values first recorded after advanced airway placement and nearest to the 30-min mark of on-scene resuscitation (30 min-ETCO2) from EMS charts. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. We compared 30 min-ETCO2 cutoffs of 10 mmHg and 20 mmHg to the trend (increasing or not) from initial to 30 min-ETCO2 (delta-ETCO2) using sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating curves (AUROC). RESULTS: Of 3837 adult OHCA, 2850 were initially non-shockable, and there were 617 (16.1%) cases of refractory non-shockable OHCA at 30-min. We excluded 320 cases without at least two ETCO2 recordings in the EMS chart, leaving 297 cases that met inclusion criteria. Of these, 176 (59.3%) were transported and 2 (0.7%) survived to discharge. Using absolute 30 min-ETCO2 cutoffs, both survivors were in the >10 mmHg group (sensitivity 100.0%, specificity 12.5%), whereas only one survivor was identified in the >20 mmHg group (sensitivity 50.0%, specificity 32.5%). Using delta-ETCO2, both survivors were in the increasing ETCO2 group (sensitivity 100.0%, specificity 60.7%). In comparing the two tests that did not misclassify survivors, the AUROC [95% CI] was higher when using delta-ETCO2 (0.803 [0.775-0.831]) compared to an absolute cutoff of 10 mmHg (0.563 [0.544-0.582]). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one-sixth of EMS-treated adult OHCA patients had refractory non-shockable arrests after at least 30 min of ongoing resuscitation. In this group, the ETCO2 trend following advanced airway placement may be more accurate in guiding termination of resuscitation than an absolute ETCO2 cutoff of 10 or 20 mmHg.

The Current Discussion Regarding End-of-Life Care for Patients with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest with Initial Non-Shockable Rhythm: A Narrative Review.

Despite recent advances in resuscitation science, outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with initial non-shockable rhythm remains poor. Those with initial non-shockable rhythm have some epidemiological features, including the proportion of patients with a witnessed arrest, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), age, and presumed etiology of cardiac arrest have been reported, which differ from those with initial shockable rhythm. The discussion regarding better end-of-life care for patients with OHCA is a major concern among citizens. As one of the efforts to avoid unwanted resuscitation, advance directive is recognized as a key intervention, safeguarding patient autonomy. However, several difficulties remain in enhancing the effective use of advance directives for patients with OHCA, including local regulation of their use, insufficient utilization of advance directives by emergency medical services at the scene, and a lack of established tools for discussing futility of resuscitation in advance care planning. In addition, prehospital termination of resuscitation is a common practice in many emergency medical service systems to assist clinicians in deciding whether to discontinue resuscitation. However, there are also several unresolved problems, including the feasibility of implementing the rules for several regions and potential missed survivors among candidates for prehospital termination of resuscitation. Further investigation to address these difficulties is warranted for better end-of-life care of patients with OHCA.

Termination-of-resuscitation rule in the emergency department for patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a nationwide, population-based observational study.

BACKGROUND: In Japan, emergency medical service (EMS) providers are prohibited from field termination-of-resuscitation (TOR) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. In 2013, we developed a TOR rule for emergency department physicians (Goto's TOR rule) immediately after hospital arrival. However, this rule is subject to flaws, and there is a need for revision owing to its relatively low specificity for predicting mortality compared with other TOR rules in the emergency department. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate a modified Goto's TOR rule by considering prehospital EMS cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) duration. METHODS: We analysed the records of 465,657 adult patients with OHCA from the All-Japan Utstein registry from 2016 to 2019 and divided them into two groups: development (n = 231,363) and validation (n = 234,294). The primary outcome measures were specificity, false-positive rate (FPR), and positive predictive value (PPV) of the revised TOR rule in the emergency department for predicting 1-month mortality. RESULTS: Recursive partitioning analysis for the development group in predicting 1-month mortality revealed that a modified Goto's TOR rule could be defined if patients with OHCA met the following four criteria: (1) initial asystole, (2) unwitnessed arrest by any laypersons, (3) EMS-CPR duration > 20 min, and (4) no prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). The specificity, FPR, and PPV of the rule for predicting 1-month mortality were 99.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 99.0-99.4%), 0.8% (0.6-1.0%), and 99.8% (99.8-99.9%), respectively. The proportion of patients who fulfilled the rule and the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was 27.5% (95% CI 27.3-27.7%) and 0.904 (0.902-0.905), respectively. In the validation group, the specificity, FPR, PPV, proportion of patients who met the rule, and AUC were 99.1% (95% CI 98.9-99.2%), 0.9% (0.8-1.1%), 99.8% (99.8-99.8%), 27.8% (27.6-28.0%), and 0.889 (0.887-0.891), respectively. CONCLUSION: The modified Goto's TOR rule (which includes the following four criteria: initial asystole, unwitnessed arrest, EMS-CPR duration > 20 min, and no prehospital ROSC) with a > 99% predictor of 1-month mortality is a reliable tool for physicians treating refractory OHCAs immediately after hospital arrival.

International initiation and termination of resuscitation practices: Protocol of a cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: Substantial variation in survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is described both internationally and nationally. The Utstein factors account for half of the variation, but the remaining is not fully understood. Local regulations or guidelines concerning the withholding and termination of resuscitation may influence the reporting of cardiac arrests when comparing outcomes between different Emergency Medical Service systems. METHOD: We have developed an online cross-sectional mixed-methods explanatory design survey aimed at describing the international and national variations in the initiation, the termination of resuscitation, and the refraining from resuscitation of adult patients (>18 years of age) suffering from non-traumatic OHCA. The respondents will be national experts and the questionnaire will be distributed among members of European Prehospital Research Alliance, the International Liaison Committee of Resuscitation, the European Resuscitation Council, and the Resuscitation Academy. Each invited country will have to identify at least two national experts with special expertise in prehospital resuscitation practices. We exclude countries with less than two respondents. RESULTS: The survey will provide both quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative data will be presented as frequencies and proportions. Qualitative data will be analyzed using content analysis. CONCLUSION: This survey could be of importance in understanding the multiple factors leading to the substantial variation in survival found following OHCA. Furthermore, the interpretation of future studies on OHCA from different settings may be improved to further increase survival following OHCA.

Prehospital Providers' Perspectives about Online Medical Direction in Emergency End-of-Life Decision-Making.

Background: End-of-life treatment decisions present special challenges for prehospital emergency providers. Paramedics regularly make value-laden choices that transcend technical judgment and professional skill, affecting the type of care, how and to whom it is provided. Changes in prehospital emergency care over the last decade have created new moral challenges for prehospital emergency providers; these changes have also accentuated the need for paramedics to make rapid and reasoned ethical judgments. Objective: The purpose of the study was to explore the decision-making process that occurs when prehospital emergency teams respond to an end-of-life call with a focus on how state authorized documents such as a Non-Hospital Do Not Resuscitate (NHDNR) or Medical/Physician's Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST/POLST) or lack thereof inform decision-making. This paper presents the specific circumstances that informed the need for intervention from Online Medical Direction (OLMD) framed in the perspectives and words of the prehospital providers seeking that assistance. Methods: This study involved in-depth in-person interviews with 50 providers to elicit participants' experiences in their own words using a semi-structured interview instrument. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed with permission. Results: Five themes emerged that illuminated how and when OLMD was involved in emergency end-of-life decisions: Termination of Resuscitation (TOR); Family Revoked DNR; Missing Documents; No Documents and No CPR; and Unusual Situations. Participants illustrated how the decision to terminate efforts was best-supported when it was made by collaboration between the on-scene provider and OLMD. Participants described ethical dilemmas when families asked them to initiate CPR in the presence of DNR orders and cognitive dissonance when CPR has been initiated but a valid DNR/MOLST is subsequently located. Conclusions: The study findings demonstrate the invaluable contribution of OLMD for complex end-of-life care decisions by prehospital providers, especially when there are difficult legal, ethical, and logistical questions. OLMD provides far more than technical support.

Predictive performances of ALS and BLS termination of resuscitation rules in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest for different resuscitation protocols.

BACKGROUND: Resuscitation guidance has advanced; however, the predictive performance of the termination of resuscitation (TOR) rule has not been validated for different resuscitation protocols published by the American Heart Association (AHA). METHODS: A retrospective study validating the basic life support (BLS) and advanced life support (ALS) TOR rules was conducted using an Utstein-style database in Tainan city, Taiwan. Adult patients with nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrests from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2015, (using the AHA 2010 resuscitation protocol) and from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020, (using the AHA 2015 resuscitation protocol) were included. The characteristics of rule performance were calculated, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value. RESULTS: Among 1260 eligible OHCA patients in 2015, 757 met the BLS TOR rule and 124 met the ALS TOR rule. The specificity and PPV for predicting unfavorable neurological outcomes were 61.1% and 99.0%, respectively, for the BLS TOR rule and 93.8% and 99.2%, respectively, for the ALS TOR rule. A total of 970 OHCA patients were enrolled in 2020, of whom 438 met the BLS TOR rule and 104 met the ALS TOR rule. The specificity and PPV for predicting unfavorable neurological outcomes were 85.7% and 100%, respectively, for the BLS TOR rule and 99.5% and 100%, respectively, for the ALS TOR rule. CONCLUSIONS: Both the BLS and ALS TOR rules performed better when using the 2015 AHA resuscitation protocols compared to the 2010 protocols, with increased PPVs and decreased false-positive rates in predicting survival to discharge and good neurological outcomes at discharge. The BLS and ALS TOR rules can perform differently while the resuscitation protocols are updated. As the concepts and practices of resuscitation progress, the BLS and ALS TOR rules should be evaluated and validated accordingly.

The Association of Death Notification and Related Training with Burnout among Emergency Medical Services Professionals.

INTRODUCTION: Death notification is a difficult task commonly encountered during prehospital care and may lead to burnout among EMS professionals. Lack of training could potentiate the relationship between death notification and burnout. The first objective of this study was to describe EMS professionals' experience with death notification and related training. The secondary objective was to assess the associations between death notification delivery, training, and burnout. Methods: We administered an electronic questionnaire to a random sample of nationally-certified EMS professionals. Work-related burnout was measured using the validated Copenhagen Burnout Inventory. Analysis was stratified by certification level to basic life support (BLS) and advanced life support (ALS). The association between the number of adult (≥18 years) patient death notifications delivered in the prior 12 months and burnout was assessed using multivariable logistic regression to adjust for confounding variables. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to assess the adjusted association between training and burnout among those who reported delivering at least one death notification in the prior 12 months. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals are reported (95% CI). Results: We received 2,333/19,330 (12%) responses and 1,514 were included in the analysis. Most ALS respondents (77%) and one-third of BLS respondents (33%) reported at least one adult death notification in the past year. Approximately half of respondents reported receiving death notification training as part of their initial EMS education program (51% BLS; 52% ALS) and fewer reported receiving continuing education (30% BLS; 44% ALS). Delivering a greater number of death notifications was associated with increased odds of burnout. Among those who delivered at least one death notification, continuing education was associated with reduced odds of burnout. Conclusion: Many EMS professionals reported delivering at least one death notification within the past year. Yet, fewer than half reported training related to death notification during initial EMS education and even fewer reported receiving continuing education. More of those who delivered death notifications experienced burnout, while continuing education was associated with reduced odds of burnout. Future work is needed to develop and evaluate death notification training specifically for EMS professionals.

Clinical prediction rule of termination of resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patient with pre-hospital defibrillation given.

OBJECTIVE: To derive a clinical prediction rule of termination of resuscitation (TOR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with pre-hospital defibrillation given. METHOD: This was a retrospective multicenter cohort study performed in three emergency departments (EDs) of three regional hospitals from 1/1/2012 to 31/12/2018. Patients of OHCA aged ≥18 years old were included. Those with post-mortem changes, return of spontaneous circulation and receiving no resuscitation in EDs were excluded. A TOR rule was derived by logistic regression analysis based on demographics and end-tidal carbon dioxide level of included subjects with pre-hospital defibrillation given. RESULTS: There were 447 included patients had received pre-hospital defibrillation, in which 148 had return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), with 22 survived to discharge (STD). Independent predictors for death on or before ED arrival (no ROSC) included EMS call to ED time >20 min and ETCO2 level <20 mmHg from first three sets. A 2-criteria rule predicting death on or before ED arrival by fulfilling both of the independent predictors had a specificity of 0.95 (95% CI 0.90-0.98) and positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.95 (95% CI 0.90-0.98), if 2nd set of ETCO2 was used. The positive likelihood ratio was 10.04 (95% CI 4.83-20.89). CONCLUSION: The 2-criteria TOR rule for OHCA patients with pre-hospital defibrillation had a high specificity and PPV for predicting death on or before ED arrival.

Evaluation of the Uptake of a Prehospital Cardiac Arrest Termination of Resuscitation Rule.

BACKGROUND: Previous research has focused on creation and validation of a basic life support rule for termination of resuscitation (TOR) in nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) to identify patients who will not be successfully resuscitated or will not have a favorable outcome. Although now widely implemented, translational research regarding in-field compliance with TOR criteria and barriers to use is scarce. OBJECTIVES: This project aimed to assess compliance rates, barriers to use, and effect on ambulance transport rates after implementing TOR criteria for OHCA. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients ≥ 18 years with OHCA. Data from regional Emergency Medical Services agencies were collected to determine TOR rule compliance for patients meeting criteria, barriers to use, and effect of a TOR rule on ambulance transport. RESULTS: There were 552 patients with OHCAs identified. Ninety-one patients met TOR criteria, with paramedics requesting TOR in 81 (89%) cases and physicians granting requests in 65 (80.2%) cases. Perceived barriers to TOR compliance included distraught families, nearby advanced-care paramedics, and unusual circumstances. Reasons for physician refusal of TOR requests included hospital proximity, patient not receiving epinephrine, and poor communication connection to paramedics. Total high priority transports decreased 15.6% after implementation of a TOR rule. CONCLUSIONS: The study found high compliance after implementation of a TOR rule and identified potentially addressable barriers to TOR use. Appropriate application of a TOR rule led to reduction in high-priority ambulance transports, potentially reducing futile use of health care resources and risk of ambulance motor vehicle collisions.

Early termination of resuscitation in in-hospital cardiac arrest and impact to the outcome calculations.

BACKGROUND: Some in-hospital resuscitation attempts are assessed futile and terminated early on. We hypothesized that if these cases are reported separately, the true outcome of in-hospital cardiac arrest is better reflected. METHODS: We conducted a 3-year prospective observational Utstein-style study in Tampere, Finland. All adult in-hospital cardiac arrests outside critical care areas attended by hospital's rapid response team were included. Resuscitation attempts that were terminated within 10 minutes were considered early terminations. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 199 in-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Twenty-seven (14%) resuscitation attempts were terminated early due to the presumed futility of the attempt with median resuscitation duration of 5 (4, 7) minutes. These cases and the 172 patients with full resuscitation attempt were of comparable age, sex and comorbidity. Early terminated resuscitation attempts were more often unwitnessed (63% vs. 10%, P < .001) with initial non-shockable rhythm (100% vs. 80%, P = .006) when compared with full attempts. The most frequently reported reasons for termination decisions were non-witnessed arrest presenting asystole as initial rhythm and severe acute illness. The hospital survival with good neurological outcome and 1-year survival were 30% and 25% for the whole cohort, and 34% and 29% when early terminated resuscitation attempts were excluded. CONCLUSION: One-seventh of resuscitation attempts were terminated early on due to presumed futility of the attempt. Short- and long-term outcomes were 5% and 4% better when early terminated attempts were excluded from the outcome analyses. We believe that in-hospital cardiac arrest outcome is not as poor as repeatedly presented in the literature.

Psychological Comfort of Paramedics with Field Death Pronouncement: A National Asian Study to Prepare Paramedics for Field Termination of Resuscitation.

OBJECTIVES: Paramedics' decision to terminate field resuscitation without a physician present may depend on personal and external factors. This study investigates factors associated with paramedic psychological comfort with termination of resuscitation (TOR) to inform future training. METHODS: We administered an anonymous survey to all practicing paramedics in a large urban Asian Emergency Medical Services system where formal TOR training had not yet been conducted and field TOR was not routinely applied. The survey assessed psychological comfort using the validated Psychological Comfort Total (PCT) scale (summed score of 28 items, with higher scores representing greater comfort). We examined scores associated with four personal (prior resolution of personal loss, knowledge of survival probability, religious affiliation and experience with death pronouncements) and two external (location of patient and perceived trust of family) factors. Data were entered into Excel and analyzed by t-tests and ANOVA. RESULTS: Response rate was 73.6% (254/345). Respondents were 30.3 years (mean, SD 7.1) with 7.2 years (mean, SD 5.54) of practice experience. Over 60% had been involved in 6 or more field death pronouncements in the prior 12 months. Higher PCT scores were associated with prior resolution of personal loss and knowledge of survival probability. Lower PCT scores were associated with patient location in a public place and perceived family lack of trust. PCT scores were not associated with paramedic religious affiliation or number of prior death pronouncements. CONCLUSIONS: Paramedic psychological comfort with field death pronouncement is associated with personal and external factors. Since paramedic comfort is important for protocol adoption, TOR education should target not only knowledge, but also public arena management, communication skills for engaging with families, and help paramedics resolve prior personal loss.

Can We Define Termination Of Resuscitation Criteria In Out-Of-Hospital Hanging?

OBJECTIVE: Survival rate of cardiac arrest due to hanging (H-CA) victims is low. Hence, this leads to the question of the utility of resuscitation in these patients. The objective was to investigate whether there are predictive criteria for survival with a good neurological outcome or predictive criteria for non-survival or survival with a poor neurological outcome enabling us to define the termination of resuscitation rules in these patients. METHODS: Between July 1, 2011 and January 1, 2016, we included 1,689 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests due to hanging. We compared the characteristics of survivors with a good neurological outcome at day 30 with the others. RESULTS: The study population was mainly composed of males with a median age of 48 [37-60]. The overall survival was 2.1%, among which 48.6% had a good neurological outcome. Survivors benefited more often from immediate basic life support than the rest of the subjects, which was corroborated by the shorter no-flow durations. We did not record any difference in terms of advanced cardiac life support initiation frequency and technique between survivors with a good neurological outcome and the rest. Nevertheless, ACLS duration was longer in survivors with a good neurological outcome than in others. CONCLUSIONS: Basic life support (BLS) was the decisive criterion for 15/17 survivors. However, a detailed analysis showed 2 survivors presenting no BLS before the arrival of mobile medical teams and non-shockable rhythms who survived at day 30 with a good neurological outcome. These results lead us to consider that mobile medical team intervention and ACLS attempt are not futile, and the benefit justifies the cost. Thus, we cannot define any rule for the termination of resuscitation.

EMS Provider Perceptions on Termination of Resuscitation in a Large, Urban EMS System.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the value of out-of-hospital Termination of Resuscitation (TOR) and the scientific evidence in favor of this practice, TOR has not been uniformly adopted or consistently practiced in EMS systems. Previous focus group studies have identified multiple barriers to implementation of out of hospital TOR but existing literature on EMS provider perceptions is limited. We sought to identify EMS providers' perceived barriers to performing out-of-hospital TOR in a large urban EMS system. METHODS: The Chicago EMS System is a regional collaborative of EMS physicians, nurses and provider agencies, including the Chicago Fire Department (CFD), which provides exclusive emergency response for 9-1-1 calls in Chicago. CFD is an urban, fire-based EMS agency with a tiered response, with fire-fighter EMTs and paramedics providing initial care, and single role paramedics providing supplemental care and transport. A 2-page written survey was distributed to understand providers' experiences with managing OHCA and perceived barriers to TOR to inform subsequent improvements in protocol development and education. RESULTS: Of 3500 EMS providers that received the survey, 2309 were completed (66%). Survey respondent demographics were fire-fighter/EMTB (69%), fire-fighter/paramedic (14%), and single role paramedic (17%). The most frequent barrier to field TOR was scene safety (86%). The most common safety issue identified was family reaction to TOR (68%) and many providers felt threatened by family when trying to perform TOR (38%). Providers with a higher career numbers of OHCA were more likely to have felt threatened by the family (OR 6.70, 95% CI 2.99-15.00) and single role paramedics were more likely than FF/EMTBs to have felt threatened (OR 3.34, 95% CI 2.65-4.22). Barriers to delivering a death notification after TOR, include being uncomfortable or threatened with possible family reaction (52%) and family asking to continue the resuscitation (45%). There was lack of formal prior death notification training, the majority learned from colleagues through on the job training. CONCLUSIONS: Our study identifies scene safety, death notification delivery, and lack of formal training in death notification as barriers that EMS providers face while performing TOR in a large urban EMS system. These findings informed educational and operational initiatives to overcome the identified provider level issues and improve compliance with TOR policies.

Termination of Resuscitation Rules to Predict Neurological Outcomes in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest for an Intermediate Life Support Prehospital System.

AIM: Futile resuscitation can lead to unnecessary transports for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The Basic Life Support (BLS) and Advanced Life Support (ALS) termination of resuscitation (TOR) guidelines have been validated with good results in North America. This study aims to evaluate the performance of these two rules in predicting neurological outcomes of OHCA patients in Singapore, which has an intermediate life support Emergency Medical Services (EMS) system. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was carried out on Singapore OHCA data collected from April 2010 to May 2012 for the Pan-Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study (PAROS). The outcomes of each rule were compared to the actual neurological outcomes of the patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and predicted transport rates of each test were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 2,193 patients had cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac etiology. TOR was recommended for 1,411 patients with the BLS-TOR rule, with a specificity of 100% (91.9, 100.0) for predicting poor neurological outcomes, PPV 100% (99.7, 100.0), sensitivity 65.7% (63.6, 67.7), NPV 5.6% (4.1, 7.5), and transportation rate 35.6%. Using the ALS-TOR rule, TOR was recommended for 587 patients, specificity 100% (91.9, 100.0) for predicting poor neurological outcomes, PPV 100% (99.4, 100.0), sensitivity 27.3% (25.4, 29.3), NPV 2.7% (2.0, 3.7), and transportation rate 73.2%. BLS-TOR predicted survival (any neurological outcome) with specificity 93.4% (95% CI 85.3, 97.8) versus ALS-TOR 98.7% (95% CI 92.9, 99.8). CONCLUSION: Both the BLS and ALS-TOR rules had high specificities and PPV values in predicting neurological outcomes, the BLS-TOR rule had a lower predicted transport rate while the ALS-TOR rule was more accurate in predicting futility of resuscitation. Further research into unique local cultural issues would be useful to evaluate the feasibility of any system-wide implementation of TOR.

Withholding or termination of resuscitation in pediatric out-of-hospital traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest.

This multiorganizational literature review was undertaken to provide an evidence base for determining whether or not recommendations for out-of-hospital termination of resuscitation could be made for children who are victims of traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest. Although there is increasing acceptance of out-of-hospital termination of resuscitation for adult traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest when there is no expectation of a good outcome, children are routinely excluded from state termination-of-resuscitation protocols. The decision to withhold resuscitative efforts in a child under specific circumstances (decapitation or dependent lividity, rigor mortis, etc) is reasonable. If there is any doubt as to the circumstances or timing of the traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest, under the current status of limiting termination of resuscitation in the field to persons older than 18 years in most states, resuscitation should be initiated and continued until arrival to the appropriate facility. If the patient has arrested, resuscitation has already exceeded 30 minutes, and the nearest facility is more than 30 minutes away, involvement of parents and family of these children in the decision-making process with assistance and guidance from medical professionals should be considered as part of an emphasis on family-centered care, because the evidence suggests that either death or a poor outcome is inevitable.

Small animal veterinary clients prefer veterinarians to decide when to terminate resuscitation and to be informed after cardiopulmonary resuscitation efforts.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the preferences of small animal veterinary clients for the timing of communication during CPR and whether these clients prefer the veterinarian or pet owner to decide on the termination of resuscitation. SAMPLE: Surveys (n = 1,648) were completed between January 20 and February 3, 2023, by clients of the Wilford and Kate Bailey Small Animal Teaching Hospital. METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study used an anonymous internet-based survey distributed to 28,000 clients of an academic small animal veterinary hospital. The survey included 16 questions asking for the respondents' demographics, healthcare professional status, questions pertaining to CPR, and preference for timing of communication during CPR, veterinary team members to speak to, and the decision on termination of resuscitation. An optional open comment section was provided. RESULTS: The response rate was 7.5%, including 2,127 responses, with 1,648 complete responses used for further analysis. Of the respondents, 56% and 63% (when asked using a short and long scenario question, respectively) would prefer to be informed about their pet undergoing CPR after CPR has ended. Most clients (84%) wanted the veterinarian to decide when to stop CPR. In the comments section, clients predominantly emphasized that patient care should always be prioritized over client communication. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study contributes to a better understanding of veterinary clients' preferences and may help improve client communication and decision-making during CPR. More studies are warranted to reach a wider population before broad recommendations can be made.

Comparative cost-effectiveness of termination of resuscitation rules for patients transported in cardiac arrest.

AIM: To compare the cost-effectiveness of termination-of-resuscitation (TOR) rules for patients transported in cardiac arrest. METHODS: The economic analyses evaluated cost-effectiveness of alternative TOR rules for OHCA from a National Health Service (NHS) and personal social services (PSS) perspective over a lifetime horizon. A systematic review was used to identify the different TOR rules included in the analyses. Data from the OHCAO outcomes registry, trial data and published literature were used to compare outcomes for the different rules identified. The economic analyses estimated discounted NHS and PSS costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for each TOR rule, based on which incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated. RESULTS: The systematic review identified 33 TOR rules and the economic analyses assessed the performance of 29 of these TOR rules plus current practice. The most cost-effective strategies were the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) termination of resuscitation rule (ICER of £8,111), the Korean Cardiac Arrest Research Consortium 2 (KOC 2) termination of resuscitation rule (ICER of £17,548), and the universal Basic Life Support (BLS) termination of resuscitation rule (ICER of £19,498,216). The KOC 2 TOR rule was cost-effective at the established cost-effectiveness threshold of £20,000-£30,000 per QALY. CONCLUSION: The KOC 2 rule is the most cost-effective at established cost-effectiveness thresholds used to inform health care decision-making in the UK. Further research on economic implications of TOR rules is warranted to support constructive discussion on implementing TOR rules.

Incidence, risk factors, and impact of post-return of spontaneous circulation events in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A population-based study in Tokyo, Japan.

AIM: Patients with the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are unstable and often experience rearrest, after which ROSC may be reattained. This study investigated the incidence and risk factors of post-ROSC events (rearrest and subsequent reattainment of ROSC) and their impact on outcomes in patients with prehospital ROSC following OHCA. METHODS: Patients with OHCA and prehospital ROSC were identified from the Tokyo Fire Department database between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2022. The factors associated with post-ROSC events and their impact on 1-month favourable neurological outcome (cerebral performance category scale: 1 or 2) were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 64,000 individuals experienced OHCA, and 6,190 (9.7%) had ROSC. Rearrest was confirmed in 28.4% of patients with ROSC, and was associated with age, time of emergency call, location of cardiac arrest, dispatcher instruction regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation, first recorded cardiac rhythm, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillation by a bystander, response time, and prehospital interventions. ROSC reattainment was confirmed in 34.5% of patients with rearrest and associated with the first recorded cardiac rhythm and defibrillation by a bystander. Patients without rearrests had the highest proportion of favourable neurological outcomes, followed by those with solved and unsolved rearrests (38.6% vs. 22.4% and 4.4%, P < 0.001). The difference remained significant after adjustment for confounders. CONCLUSION: This study revealed population-based incidence and risk factors of post-ROSC events. Rearrest was common, leading to unfavourable neurological outcome; however, its deleterious impact may be mitigated by successful resuscitation efforts.

Development and validation of a prehospital termination of resuscitation (TOR) rule for out - of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) cases using general purpose artificial intelligence (AI).

BACKGROUND: Prehospital identification of futile resuscitation efforts (defined as a predicted probability of survival lower than 1%) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) may reduce unnecessary transport. Reliable prediction variables for OHCA 'termination of resuscitation' (TOR) rules are needed to guide treatment decisions. The Universal TOR rule uses only three variables (Absence of Prehospital ROSC, Event not witnessed by EMS and no shock delivered on the scene) has been externally validated and is used by many EMS systems. Deep learning, an artificial intelligence (AI) platform is an attractive model to guide the development of TOR rule for OHCA. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of developing an AI-TOR rule for neurologically favorable outcomes using general purpose AI and compare its performance to the Universal TOR rule. METHODS: We identified OHCA cases of presumed cardiac etiology who were 18 years of age or older from 2016 to 2019 in the All-Japan Utstein Registry. We divided the dataset into 2 parts, the first half (2016-2017) was used as a training dataset for rule development and second half (2018-2019) for validation. The AI software (Prediction One®) created the model using the training dataset with internal cross-validation. It also evaluated the prediction accuracy and displayed the ranking of influencing variables. We performed validation using the second half cases and calculated the prediction model AUC. The top four of the 11 variables identified in the model were then selected as prognostic factors to be used in an AI-TOR rule, and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated from validation cohort. This was then compared to the performance of the Universal TOR rule using same dataset. RESULTS: There were 504,561 OHCA cases, 18 years of age or older, 302,799 cases were presumed cardiac origin. Of these, 149,425 cases were used for the training dataset and 153,374 cases for the validation dataset. The model developed by AI using 11 variables had an AUC of 0.969, and its AUC for the validation dataset was 0.965. The top four influencing variables for neurologically favorable outcome were Prehospital ROSC, witnessed by EMS, Age (68 years old and younger) and nonasystole. The AUC calculated using the 4 variables for the AI-TOR rule was 0.953, and its AUC for the validation dataset was 0.952 (95%CI 0.949 -0.954). Of 80,198 patients in the validation cohort that satisfied all four criteria for the AI-TOR rule, 58 (0.07%) had a neurologically favorable one-month survival. The specificity of AI-TOR rule was 0.990, and the PPV was 0.999 for predicting lack of neurologically favorable survival, both the specificity and PPV were higher than that achieved with the universal TOR (0.959, 0.998). CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of prediction models using AI software to determine outcomes in OHCA was excellent and the AI-TOR rule's variables from prediction model performed better than the Universal TOR rule. External validation of our findings as well as further research into the utility of using AI platforms for TOR prediction in clinical practice is needed.

The ABC (Age, Bystander, and Cardiogram) score for predicting neurological outcomes of cardiac arrests without pre-hospital return of spontaneous circulation: A nationwide population-based study.

Aim: We previously proposed the ABC score to predict the neurological outcomes of cardiac arrest without prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Using nationwide population-based data, this study aimed to validate the ABC score through various resuscitation guideline periods. Methods: We analysed cases with cardiac arrest due to internal causes and failure to achieve prehospital ROSC in the All-Japan Utstein Registry. Patients from the 2007-2009, 2012-2014, and 2017-2019 periods were classified into the 2005, 2010, and 2015 guideline groups, respectively. Neurological outcomes were assessed using cerebral performance categories (CPCs) one month after the cardiac arrest. We defined CPC 1-2 as a favourable outcome. We evaluated the test characteristics of the ABC score, which could range from 0 to 3. Results: Among the 162,710, 186,228, and 190,794 patients in the 2005, 2010, and 2015 guideline groups, 0.7%, 0.8%, and 0.9% of the patients had CPC 1-2, respectively. The proportions of CPC 1-2 were 2.9%, 3.6%, and 4.6% in patients with ABC scores of 2 and were 9.5%, 13.3%, and 16.8% in patients with ABC scores of 3, respectively. Among patients with ABC scores of 0, 0.2%, 0.1%, and 0.2%, all had CPC 1-2, respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the ABC score were 0.798, 0.822, and 0.828, respectively. Conclusions: The ABC score had acceptable discrimination for neurological outcomes in patients without prehospital ROSC in the three guideline periods.