Estudios clínicos y genéticos en tres miembros de una familia afectados con adenomas hipofisarios aislados con prolactinomas homogéneos / Clinical and genetic studies of a three-member familial isolated pituitary adenoma with homogeneous prolactinomas

La mayoría de los adenomas hipofisarios son esporádicos, pero un 3-5% puede ocurrir en un contexto familiar y hereditario. Este es el caso de la neoplasia endocrina múltiple de tipo 1 (NEM1), complejo de Carney (CNC) y adenomas hipofisarios aislados familiares (FIPA). El FIPA es una condición infrecuente, que ocurre en un contexto familiar, no asociada a NEM t ipo1 ni CNC. Los FIPA pueden ser homogéneos (todos los adenomas tienen el mismo fenotipo) o heterogéneos (diferente fenotipo tumoral). Describimos una familia congolesa en la que dos hermanas y una prima fueron diagnosticadas a los 29, 32 y 40 años, respectivamente, con un prolactinoma (FIPA homogéneo). Las pacientes presentaron macroadenomas no invasivos al momento del diagnóstico, con buena respuesta biológica y tumoral al tratamiento con cabergolina hasta una dosis máxima de 1.5 mg/semanal. De las dos hermanas, una cursó un embarazo sin complicaciones. Durante el seguimiento de 12 años, ninguna de ellas presentó elementos clínicos o biológicos compatibles con NEM1 o CNC, por lo que dichos genes no se estudiaron. El análisis genético en dos de las pacientes permitió descartar la posibilidad de una mutación germinal del gen aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP). Se considera que el 80% de los pacientes con FIPA no presentan mutación del gen AIP, por lo que se requieren futuros estudios en este tipo de familias, para poder determinar otros genes afectados involucrados en su fisiopatología.

Most pituitary adenomas are sporadic, but 3-5% can occur in a family and hereditary context. This is the case of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), Carney complex (CNC) and familial isolated pituitary adenomas (FIPA). FIPA is an infrequent condition that occurs in a family context, not associated with MEN type1 or CNC. FIPA kindred can be homogeneous (all adenomas affected in the family having the same tumor phenotype) or heterogeneous (different tumor phenotypes in the affected members). We describe a Congolese family in which two sisters and a cousin were diagnosed with a prolactinoma (homogenous FIPA) at the ages of 29, 32 and 40 years, respectively. The patients presented with macroadenomas at the time of diagnosis, non-invasive tumors and good biological response to cabergoline treatment (maximum dose of 1.5 mg/weekly). Of these two sisters, one went through a pregnancy without complications. Because no MEN1 and CNC clinical and biochemical features were detected during the 12-year follow-up, these genes were not investigated. The genetic analysis of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP) was normal. As nearly 80% of patients with FIPA do not have a mutation in the AIP gene, future studies in these families are required to identify other affected genes involved in their physiopathology.

Outcome and long-term follow-up of adrenal lesions in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1

ABSTRACT Objective To describe the prevalence, clinical characteristics and outcome of adrenal lesions in long-term follow-up of Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) patients. Subjects and methods We retrospectively studied sixteen patients from six families of individuals with MEN1. Adrenal involvement was evaluated using clinical, biochemical and imaging data. Results Adrenal lesions were identified in nine of sixteen (56.3%) patients: seven women and two men (mean age: 52.2 years). Adrenal involvement was detected at MEN1 diagnosis in more than half of the patients. Eighteen adrenal nodules were founded (median of two nodules per patient) with mean adrenal lesion diameter of 17.4 mm. Three patients had unilateral adrenal involvement. Hormonal hypersecretion (autonomous cortisol secretion) was found in two patients. None of the patients was submitted to adrenalectomy, presented an aldosterone-secreting lesion, a pheochromocytoma, an adrenal carcinoma or metastatic disease during the follow-up. A predominance of stable adrenal disease, in terms of size and hormonal secretion, was observed. Adrenal lesions were evenly distributed between the germline mutations. Conclusion Adrenal tumours are a common feature of MEN1 that can affect more than half of the patients. Most of the tumours are bilateral non-functional lesions, but hormonal secretion may occur and should be promptly identified to reduce the morbidity/mortality of the syndrome. Periodic surveillance of these patients should be performed.

Síndromes de neoplasia endocrina múltiple: revisión radiológica / Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Syndromes: Radiological Review

Los síndromes de neoplasia endocrina múltiple (MEN), incluyen una serie de enfermedades con alteraciones genéticas que se caracterizan por la presencia de tumores que afectan a dos o más glándulas endocrinas. Son síndromes con una herencia autosómica dominante e incluyen tres patrones: MEN 1 (síndrome de Wermer), MEN 2 (que incluye MEN 2A o síndrome de Sipple y MEN 2B o síndrome de Wagenmann-Froboese) y MEN 4. Los adenomas paratiroideos y el carcinoma medular tiroideo, son los tumores más frecuentes del MEN tipo 1 y 2 respectivamente. Esos síndromes son más comunes en pacientes jóvenes, con patología de afectación bilateral, múltiple o multifocal y, sobre todo, en pacientes con antecedentes familiares. Es necesario el trabajo en equipo de endocrinólogos, cirujanos, oncólogos y radiólogos para optimizar el tratamiento de esos pacientes.

Multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) encompasses a serial of familial genetically disorders in wich tumors simultaneusly occur in two or more endocrine organs. MEN síndromes are autosomal-dominant disorders categorized into three main patterns: MEN 1 (Wermer syndrome), MEN 2 (includes MEN 2A o Sipple syndrome and MEN 2B o Wagenmann-Froboese syndrome) and MEN 4. Parathyroid adenomas and medullary thyroid carcinoma are the most frecuent tumors in MEN 1 and MEN 2 respectively. These entities will be suspected in younger patients, bilateral, multiple or multifocal disease and, specially, in patients with family background. Cooperation between endocrinologist, surgeons, oncologists and radiologists is pivotal for optimizing patient treatment.

Tumores hipofisarios, casuística de Anatomía Patológica / Pituitary tumors: anatomopathological reports

This study examines a description of pituitary tumors considering an anatomopathological casuistic. The study of the tumors of the Central Nervous System (CNS) include the pituitary gland, located in the sella turcica. The pathology of the sellar region is represented by the adenomas, tumors of slow development with or without endocrine secretion, that usually involve the population of young adults. The aim of this report, was to describe the casuistic of the " J. Fernandez Hospital" between the years 2000 through 2017. A retrospective review was performed and 234 samples of the sellar region were processed. Mean age was 42 years with a range of 17 to 77 years. Sex distribution was 57% women and 43 % men. Of these, 77% of the cases resulted adenomas. The conclusions obtained in the study are detailed.

Neoplasia endocrina múltiple tipo 1 con mutación negativa y fenocopias / Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 with negative mutation and phenocopies

Introducción: existen 4 tipos de neoplasias endocrinas múltiples, las cuales se caracterizan por la aparición de tumores en 2 o más glándulas endocrinas. La prevalencia de neoplasia endocrina múltiple 1 es aproximadamente 2 por 100 000, y constituyen una enfermedad poco frecuente. Objetivo: descartar, ante la sospecha de una neoplasia endocrina múltiple 1 con mutación negativa, otras enfermedades para poder diagnosticarla como tal. Presentación del caso clínico: mujer de 36 años, con diagnóstico de macroprolactinoma e hiperparatiroidismo primario normocalcémico (neoplasia endocrina múltiple 1 clínica), hallazgos clínicos que justificaron el estudio genético. Inicialmente para neoplasia endocrina múltiple 1, resultó negativo. En pacientes con neoplasia endocrina múltiple 1 clínica -o alta sospecha de neoplasia endocrina múltiple 1 en los que no se identifica mutación- hay que considerar que se trate de una fenocopia y ampliar el estudio genético: CDC73, CDKN1B, CaSR y AIP. También se analizaron estos genes, y fueron negativos. Otra entidad a considerar sería el hiperparatiroidismo aislado familiar. Conclusiones: llegar al diagnóstico de neoplasia endocrina múltiple 1 a veces no es tan simple, como identificar una mutación positiva. Es importante descartar fenocopias, para poder diagnosticar correctamente al paciente, pues esto determinará el seguimiento en búsqueda de otros posibles tumores, lo que -en último término- puede condicionar el pronóstico(AU)

Introduction: there are four types of multiple endocrine neoplasias which are characterized by occurrence of tumors in two or more endocrine glands. The prevalence rate of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 is 2 per 100 000 patients approximately and it is a rare disease. Objective: to rule out the existence of any other disease in order to properly diagnose a suspected multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 with negative mutation. Clinical case presentation: a 36 years-old woman diagnosed with macroprolactinoma and primary normocalcemic hyperparathyroidism (clinical multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1) and clinical findings supporting the performance of a genetic study. The study initially yielded negative results for the above-mentioned disease. However, in those patients with clinical multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1- or high suspicious of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 with no identified mutation- it must be considered that there is a phenocopy and the genetic study must be extended to include CDC 73, CDKN1B, CaSR and AIP. These genes were also analyzed with negative results. Another disease to be considered would be isolated family hyperparathyroidism. Conclusions: making the diagnosis of a multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 is not sometimes as simple as identifying a positive mutation. It is important to rule out possible phenocopies to be able to adequately diagnose a patient, since this will determine the search for other probable tumors which may ultimately influence this prognosis(AU)

Neoplasia endocrina múltiple tipo 1 A propósito de un caso / Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 About a case

La neoplasia endocrina múltiple tipo 1 (NEM1) es un raro síndrome hereditario, autosómico dominante, clásicamente caracterizado por tumores en varias glándulas (paratiroides, adenohipófisis e islotes pancreáticos). La prevalencia del NEM1 es de aproximadamente 2 por 100.000 habitantes.El síndrome de Zollinger Ellison (SZE) es una de las 3 neoplasias que forman parte del NEM1 y corresponde al 20 a 60%. A continuación se presenta el caso clínico de un paciente de sexo masculino, 66 años de edad, con cuadro clínico de síndrome de Zollinger Ellison que, en investigación posterior, evidencia alteración funcional de las glándulas paratiroides, cumpliendo criterios diagnósticos de neoplasia endocrina múltiple tipo 1 (NEM1).(AU)

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is a rare autosomal dominant hereditary syndrome, classically characterized by the presence of tumors in several glands (parathyroid, anterior pituitary and pancreatic islets) The prevalence of MEN 1 is approximately 2 per 100,000 inhabitants. The Zollinger Ellison syndrome (ZES) is one of the three neoplasias that form part of the MEN 1, and corresponds to 20 to 60%. The clinical case of a 66-year-old male patient, with a clinical of Zollinger Ellison Syndrome, who in a subsequent investigation shows functional abnormality of the parathyroid glands, fulfilling diagnostic criteria of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 (NEM1) (AU)

Tumores e hiperplasias adrenocorticais: identificação de possíveisdoenças hereditárias / Recognition of hereditary diseases related to adrenocortical tumors andhyperplasias

A alta prevalência de tumores da glândula adrenal deve-se, em parte, ao avanço dos métodos de imagem. Os adenomas, carcinomas e hiperplasias oriundos do córtex adrenal são responsáveis por 80 a 90% dos processos tumorais. Alguns casos são herdados e podem estar associados a efeito compressivo de massa tumoral, hipersecreção de esteroides ou manifestações clínicas em outros órgãos. Considerando as hiperplasias e tumores adrenocorticais, o objetivo desse trabalho foi auxiliar os médicos na identificação de pacientes que apresentem risco para doença hereditária. As neoplasias e hiperplasias adrenocorticais podem ser encontradas em síndromes hereditárias, como a síndrome de Li-Fraumeni, síndrome de Beckwith-Wiedemann, neoplasia endócrina múltipla do tipo I, síndrome de Gardner e no complexo de Carney. A hereditariedade também está associada com doenças adrenocorticais na hiperplasia adrenal congênita, no aldosteronismo primário e/ou na síndrome de Cushing (doença clínica ou subclínica) na hiperplasia adrenal macronodular primária. Essa revisão descreve as características clínicas e os defeitos genéticos responsáveis pelas síndromes hereditárias. Relacionamos também a classificação histopatológica dos processos expansivos com os principais sinais clínicos e os genes relacionados. A identificação de defeitos genéticos em células germinativas nessas doenças familiais permite o conhecimento de alterações somáticas em alguns tipos de processos tumorais adrenocorticais de etiologia esporádica. Considerando a prevalência dos tumores do córtex adrenal, a identificação de predisposição hereditária é essencial para assegurar a conduta clínica correta do paciente e o aconselhamento genético de seus familiares.

The adrenal gland tumors are prevalent due in part by the widespread use of imaging studies. Adenomas, carcinomas and hyperplasias, originating from the adrenal cortex, account for 80-90% of adrenal tumoral processes. Some cases are inherited and may be associated with local mass effect, steroid hypersecretion and/or clinical manifestation in other organs. In the context of adrenocortical tumors and hyperplasias, the purpose of this article is to assist physicians in identifying patients who may be at risk of hereditary diseases. Adrenocortical hyperplasias and neoplasias can be found in familial tumor syndromes, such as Li-Fraumeni syndrome, Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, Gardner syndrome and Carney complex. Heredity has been also associated with adrenocortical lesions in congenital adrenal hyperplasia, primary aldosteronism and/or Cushing syndrome (overt or subclinical disease) in primary macronodular adrenal hyperplasia (PMAH). This review describes the clinical recognition and genetic defects that have been found to be responsible for these hereditary diseases. Furthermore, we present the histopathologic classification of adrenocortical expansive processes in correlation to the main clinical features and related genes. The identification of germline genetic defects in such familial diseases lead to the identification of somatic alterations in a subgroup of sporadic adrenocortical lesions. Considering the prevalence of adrenocortical tumors, identification of a hereditary predisposition is essential to assure the adequate clinical management of the patient and to offer the genetic counselling to family members.

Papel de la ultrasonografía intraoperatoria en sujetos con tumores neuroendocrinos de páncreas con sospecha de NEM 1 / Intraoperative Ultrasonography in Patients with Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 (MEN 1)

Objetivo: Revisar la literatura sobre la utilidad de la ultrasonografía intraoperatoria (USIOP) en sujetos con tumores neuroendocrinos del páncreas (TNEp). Metodología: Se presenta un caso de TNEp en el contexto de neoplasia endocrina múltiple tipo 1 (NEM-1) con sus hallazgos clínicos, bioquímicos y radiológicos, así como el abordaje quirúrgico y los resultados. Se discute el rendimiento de las imágenes diagnósticas preoperatorias y el uso de la USIOP. Resultados: Hombre de 31 años remitido con sospecha de insulinoma e historia de síndrome convulsivo de 9 años de evolución. Tenía una tomografía computarizada de abdomen que mostraba una lesión pancreática de 28 × 22 mm; un estudio de Octreoscan® mostró captación focal del radiotrazador muy prominente en la unión de la cabeza con el cuerpo del páncreas; se realizó una prueba de ayuno que mostró hipoglucemia hiperinsulinémica, calcio ionizado elevado, paratohormona (PTH) elevada, compatible con hiperparatiroidismo primario. Se llevó a cirugía guiada por USIOP con sospecha de NEM 1 y se lograron resecar cinco tumores neuroendocrinos de páncreas y duodeno, con metástasis ganglionar regional. Conclusiones: La USIOP de páncreas puede cambiar el abordaje quirúrgico y el pronóstico de los sujetos con TNEp y en sospecha de NEM 1. Además, permite guiar el tratamiento quirúrgico, al facilitar la localización y caracterización de las lesiones pancreáticas y, a su vez, confirma si las lesiones han sido completamente resecadas. Se recomienda su uso en todos los sujetos con TNEp y en aquellos con sospecha de NEM 1.

Purpose: Review of the literature regarding the utility of intraoperative ultrasonography in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). Methods: We present a case of PNETs in the context of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1), with their clinical, biochemical, and radiological findings, as well as surgical approach and results. The performance of pre-operatory diagnostic images and the use of USIOP is discussed. Results: A 31 year old man with history of epilepsy was remitted with suspicion of insulinoma and a history of convulsive syndrome with 9 years of evolution. An abdominal computerized tomography scan showed a 28 x 22 mm. pancreatic lesion and an Octreoscan® showed focal capitation of the very prominent radiotracer at the junction of the head and body of the pancreas. Fasting tests showed hypoglycemic hyperinsulinemia; elevated parathyroid hormones compatible with primary hyperparathyroidism. The patient was remitted to surgery guided by IO-US with suspicion of MEN 1 and five neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas and duodenum were isolated, with regional lymph node metastasis. Conclusions: IO-US of the pancreas can modify the surgical approach and the prognosis in patients with PNETs with suspicion of MEN- 1; it guides surgical treatment, enabling localization and characterization of pancreatic lesions and confirmation of the complete removal of the tumors. IO- US is recommended in all patients with PNETs and patients with suspicion of MEN- 1.

Supernumerary parathyroid glands in hyperparathyroidism associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 / Paratireoides supranumerárias em hiperparatireoidismo primário associado a neoplasia endócrina múltipla tipo 1

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate frequency, anatomic presentation, and quantities of supernumerary parathyroids glands in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (HPT1) associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), as well as the importance of thymectomy, and the benefits of localizing examinations for those glands. METHODS: Forty-one patients with hyperparathyroidism associated with MEN1 who underwent parathyroidectomy between 1997 and 2007 were retrospectively studied. The location and number of supernumerary parathyroids were reviewed, as well as whether cervical ultrasound and parathyroid SESTAMIBI scan (MIBI) were useful diagnostic tools. RESULTS: In five patients (12.2%) a supernumerary gland was identified. In three of these cases (40%), the glands were near the thyroid gland and were found during the procedure. None of the imaging examinations were able to detect supernumerary parathyroids. In one case, only the pathologic examination could find a microscopic fifth gland in the thymus. In the last case, the supernumerary gland was resected through a sternotomy after a recurrence of hyperparathyroidism, ten years after the initial four-gland parathyroidectomy without thymectomy. MIBI was capable of detecting this gland, but only in the recurrent setting. Cervical ultrasound did not detect any supernumerary glands. CONCLUSION: The frequency of supernumerary parathyroid gland in the HPT1/MEN1 patients studied (12.2%) was significant. Surgeons should be aware of the need to search for supernumerary glands during neck exploration, besides the thymus. Imaging examinations were not useful in the pre-surgical location of these glands, and one case presented a recurrence of hyperparathyroidism.

OBJETIVO: Avaliação da frequência, da localização anatômica e do número de paratireoides extranumerárias em pacientes com hiperparatireoidismo primário (HPT1) associado a neoplasia endócrina múltipla tipo 1(NEM1), além da avaliação da importância da timectomia e da utilidade dos exames radiológicos para localização destes. MÉTODOS: Foram avaliados de forma retrospectiva 41 pacientes portadores de NEM1 com HPT1 submetidos a paratireoidectomia entre 1997 e 2007. O número de glândulas supranumerárias encontradas e a sua localização foram revisados, assim como a utilidade do ultrassom cervical e do SESTAMIBI (MIBI) de paratireoide como ferramentas diagnósticas. RESULTADOS: Em cinco pacientes (12,2%) foram identificadas glândulas supranumerárias. Em três destes (40%), as glândulas estavam próximas à glândula tireoide e foram encontradas durante a exploração cirúrgica. Os exames de imagem não foram úteis para a localização destas glândulas. Em um caso, apenas o exame anatomopatológico foi capaz de encontrar uma glândula extranumerária microscópica localizada no timo. No último caso, uma quinta glândula foi ressecada por meio de esternotomia após a recidiva do hiperparatireoidismo, cerca de 10 anos após a paratireoidectomia realizada sem timectomia na ocasião. Neste caso o MIBI detectou esta paratireoide apenas após a recidiva da doença. Em nenhum dos casos o ultrassom cervical foi capaz de detectar glândulas extranumerárias. CONCLUSÃO: A frequência de paratireoides supranumerárias em nossa casuística foi significativa (12,2%). Durante a exploração cervical, o cirurgião deve estar atento para localizar glândulas extranumerárias além do timo. Exames de imagem não foram úteis na localização préoperatória dessas glândulas, e em um caso houve recidiva do hiperparatireoidismo.

Mutation analysis in two Chinese families with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 / Análise de mutações em duas famílias chinesas com neoplasia endócrina múltipla tipo 1

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at identifing mutations in two Chinese genealogies with MEN1. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Three members of two Chinese families with MEN1 were enrolled in this study, and all of the coding regions and adjacent sequences of the MEN1 gene were amplified and sequenced. RESULTS: A recurrent mutation of heterozygous change T>A at IVS 4+1 was found in family I, and a novel insGAGGTGG mutation (c.703-709dup7bp) resulted in a frameshift (p.A237Gfsx13) in family II. CONCLUSION: We are able to add a new mutation of MEN1 gene in Chinese patients with MEN1 that will be useful for the diagnosis and treatment of the disease.

OBJETIVO: O objetivo deste estudo foi identificar as mutações em duas famílias chinesas com NEM1. SUJEITOS E MÉTODOS: Três membros das duas famílias chinesas foram estudados. Em todos eles, as regiões codificadoras e sequências adjacentes do gene MEN1 foram amplificadas e sequenciadas. RESULTADOS: Uma alteração heterozigota recorrente de T>A em IVS 4+1 foi encontrada na família I, e uma nova mutação insGAGGTGG (c.703-709dup7bp) levou a um frameshift (p.A237Gfsx13) na família II. CONCLUSÃO: Adicionou-se uma nova mutação ao gene MEN1 em pacientes chineses com diagnóstico de NEM1 que vai ser útil no diagnóstico e tratamento da doença.

Multiple endocrine neoplasia: the Chilean experience

Multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) types 1 and 2 are genetic diseases that are inherited as autosomal traits. The major clinical manifestations of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 include the so-called "3 P's": parathyroid, pituitary, and pancreatic tumors, including gastroenteroneuroendocrine tumors. Genetic testing can be performed on patients and the potential carriers of the menin gene mutation, but the genotype-phenotype correlation in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 is less straightforward than multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2. Most likely, the main advantage of genetic testing in MEN1 is to exclude from further studies those who are negative for the genetic mutation if they belong to a family with a known history of MEN1. In Chile, we started with rearranged during transfection proto-oncogene genetic testing (MEN2) 15 years ago. We carried out a prophylactic total thyroidectomy to prevent medullary thyroid carcinoma in a three-year-old girl who presented with microscopic medullary thyroid carcinoma. More than 90% of the individuals who tested positive using a genetic test achieved a biochemical cure compared with only 27% of patients who receive a clinical diagnosis. Mutations are mainly located in exon 11; the most common is C634W, rather than C634R. Hypertensive crisis was the cause of death in three patients, and extensive distant metastases occurred in nine (including two patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B) of 14 patients. Earlier recognition of medullary thyroid carcinoma and the other features of the disease, especially pheochromocytoma, will improve the survival rate of patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia.

Familial gigantism

Familial GH-secreting tumors are seen in association with three separate hereditary clinical syndromes: multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, Carney complex, and familial isolated pituitary adenomas.

Clinical and genetic aspects of familial isolated pituitary adenomas

Pituitary adenomas represent a group of functionally diverse neoplasms with relatively high prevalence in the general population. Most occur sporadically, but inherited genetic predisposing factors are increasingly recognized. Familial isolated pituitary adenoma is a recently defined clinical entity, and is characterized by hereditary presentation of pituitary adenomas in the absence of clinical and genetic features of syndromic disease such as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and Carney complex. Familial isolated pituitary adenoma is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner and accounted for approximately 2-3% of pituitary tumors in some series. Germline mutations in the aryl-hydrocarbon interacting protein gene are identified in around 25% of familial isolated pituitary adenoma kindreds. Pituitary adenomas with mutations of the aryl-hydrocarbon interacting protein gene are predominantly somatotropinomas and prolactinomas, but non-functioning adenomas, Cushing disease, and thyrotropinoma may also occur. These tumors may present as macroadenomas in young patients and are often relatively difficult to control. Furthermore, recent evidence indicates that aryl-hydrocarbon interacting protein gene mutations occur in >10% of patients with sporadic macroadenomas that occur before 30 years of age, and in >20% of children with macroadenomas. Genetic screening for aryl-hydrocarbon interacting protein gene mutations is warranted in selected high-risk patients who may benefit from early recognition and follow-up.

Pituitary tumors in patients with MEN1 syndrome

We briefly review the characteristics of pituitary tumors associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 is an autosomal-dominant disorder most commonly characterized by tumors of the pituitary, parathyroid, endocrine-gastrointestinal tract, and pancreas. A MEDLINE search for all available publications regarding multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and pituitary adenomas was undertaken. The prevalence of pituitary tumors in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 may vary from 10% to 60% depending on the studied series, and such tumors may occur as the first clinical manifestation of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 in 25% of sporadic and 10% of familial cases. Patients were younger and the time between initial and subsequent multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 endocrine lesions was significantly longer when pituitary disease was the initial manifestation of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Tumors were larger and more invasive and clinical manifestations related to the size of the pituitary adenoma were significantly more frequent in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 than in subjects with non-multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Normalization of pituitary hypersecretion was much less frequent in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 than in subjects with non-multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Pituitary tumors in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 syndrome tend to be larger, invasive and more symptomatic, and they tend to occur in younger patients when they are the initial presentation of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1.

Variable clinical expression in patients with a germline MEN1 disease gene mutation: clues to a genotype-phenotype correlation

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 is an inherited endocrine tumor syndrome, predominantly characterized by tumors of the parathyroid glands, gastroenteropancreatic tumors, pituitary adenomas, adrenal adenomas, and neuroendocrine tumors of the thymus, lungs or stomach. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 is caused by germline mutations of the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 tumor suppressor gene. The initial germline mutation, loss of the wild-type allele, and modifying genetic and possibly epigenetic and environmental events eventually result in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 tumors. Our understanding of the function of the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 gene product, menin, has increased significantly over the years. However, to date, no clear genotype-phenotype correlation has been established. In this review we discuss reports on exceptional clinical presentations of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, which may provide more insight into the pathogenesis of this disorder and offer clues for a possible genotype-phenotype correlation.

Biochemical, bone and renal patterns in hyperparathyroidism associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1

Primary hyperparathyroidism associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type I (hyperparathyroidism/multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1) differs in many aspects from sporadic hyperparathyroidism, which is the most frequently occurring form of hyperparathyroidism. Bone mineral density has frequently been studied in sporadic hyperparathyroidism but it has very rarely been examined in cases of hyperparathyroidism/multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Cortical bone mineral density in hyperparathyroidism/multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 cases has only recently been examined, and early, severe and frequent bone mineral losses have been documented at this site. Early bone mineral losses are highly prevalent in the trabecular bone of patients with hyperparathyroidism/multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. In summary, bone mineral disease in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1related hyperparathyroidism is an early, frequent and severe disturbance, occurring in both the cortical and trabecular bones. In addition, renal complications secondary to sporadic hyperparathyroidism are often studied, but very little work has been done on this issue in hyperparathyroidism/multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. It has been recently verified that early, frequent, and severe renal lesions occur in patients with hyperparathyroidism/multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, which may lead to increased morbidity and mortality. In this article we review the few available studies on bone mineral and renal disturbances in the setting of hyperparathyroidism/multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. We performed a meta-analysis of the available data on bone mineral and renal disease in cases of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1-related hyperparathyroidism.

Total parathyroidectomy in a large cohort of cases with hyperparathyroidism associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: experience from a single academic center

Most cases of sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism present disturbances in a single parathyroid gland and the surgery of choice is adenomectomy. Conversely, hyperparathyroidism associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (hyperparathyroidism/multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1) is an asynchronic, asymmetrical multiglandular disease and it is surgically approached by either subtotal parathyroidectomy or total parathyroidectomy followed by parathyroid auto-implant to the forearm. In skilful hands, the efficacy of both approaches is similar and both should be complemented by prophylactic thymectomy. In a single academic center, 83 cases of hyperparathyroidism/ multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 were operated on from 1987 to 2010 and our first surgical choice was total parathyroidectomy followed by parathyroid auto-implant to the non-dominant forearm and, since 1997, associated transcervical thymectomy to prevent thymic carcinoid. Overall, 40% of patients were given calcium replacement (mean intake 1.6 g/day) during the first months after surgery, and this fell to 28% in patients with longer follow-up. These findings indicate that several months may be needed in order to achieve a proper secretion by the parathyroid auto-implant. Hyperparathyroidism recurrence was observed in up to 15% of cases several years after the initial surgery. Thus, long-term follow-up is recommended for such cases. We conclude that, despite a tendency to subtotal parathyroidectomy worldwide, total parathyroidectomy followed by parathyroid auto-implant is a valid surgical option to treat hyperparathyroidism/multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Larger comparative systematic studies are needed to define the best surgical approach to hyperparathyroidism/multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1.

Primary hyperparathyroidism in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: when to perform surgery?

Primary hyperparathyroidism is a common endocrinological disorder. In rare circumstances, it is associated with familial syndromes, such as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. This syndrome is caused by a germline mutation in the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 gene encoding the tumor-suppressor protein menin. Usually, primary hyperparathyroidism is the initial clinical expression in carriers of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 mutations, occurring in more than 90% of patients and appearing at a young age (20-25 years). Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1/primary hyperparathyroidism is generally accompanied by multiglandular disease, clinically manifesting with hypercalcemia, although it can remain asymptomatic for a long time and consequently not always be recognized early. Surgery is the recommended treatment. The goal of this short review is to discuss the timing of surgery in patients when primary hyperparathyroidism is associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1.

Surgical treatment of pancreatic endocrine tumors in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1

Surgical approaches to pancreatic endocrine tumors associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 may differ greatly from those applied to sporadic pancreatic endocrine tumors. Presurgical diagnosis of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 is therefore crucial to plan a proper intervention. Of note, hyperparathyroidism/multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 should be surgically treated before pancreatic endocrine tumors/multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 resection, apart from insulinoma. Non-functioning pancreatic endocrine tumors/multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 >1 cm have a high risk of malignancy and should be treated by a pancreatic resection associated with lymphadenectomy. The vast majority of patients with gastrinoma/multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 present with tumor lesions at the duodenum, so the surgery of choice is subtotal or total pancreatoduodenectomy followed by regional lymphadenectomy. The usual surgical treatment for insulinoma/multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 is distal pancreatectomy up to the mesenteric vein with or without spleen preservation, associated with enucleation of tumor lesions in the pancreatic head. Surgical procedures for glucagonomas, somatostatinomas, and vipomas/ multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 are similar to those applied to sporadic pancreatic endocrine tumors. Some of these surgical strategies for pancreatic endocrine tumors/multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 still remain controversial as to their proper extension and timing. Furthermore, surgical resection of single hepatic metastasis secondary to pancreatic endocrine tumors/multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 may be curative and even in multiple liver metastases surgical resection is possible. Hepatic trans-arterial chemo-embolization is usually associated with surgical resection. Liver transplantation may be needed for select cases. Finally, pre-surgical clinical and genetic diagnosis of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 syndrome and localization of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1related tumors are crucial for determining the best surgical strategies in each individual case with pancreatic endocrine tumors.

Surgical approach in patients with hyperparathyroidism in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: total versus partial parathyroidectomy

Usually, primary hyperparathyroidism is the first endocrinopathy to be diagnosed in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, and is also the most common one. The timing of the surgery and strategy in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1/hyperparathyroidism are still under debate. The aims of surgery are to: 1) correct hypercalcemia, thus preventing persistent or recurrent hyperparathyroidism; 2) avoid persistent hypoparathyroidism; and 3) facilitate the surgical treatment of possible recurrences. Currently, two types of surgical approach are indicated: 1) subtotal parathyroidectomy with removal of at least 3-3 K glands; and 2) total parathyroidectomy with grafting of autologous parathyroid tissue. Transcervical thymectomy must be performed with both of these procedures. Unsuccessful surgical treatment of hyperparathyroidism is more frequently observed in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 than in sporadic hyperparathyroidism. The recurrence rate is strongly influenced by: 1) the lack of a pre-operative multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 diagnosis; 2) the surgeon's experience; 3) the timing of surgery; 4) the possibility of performing intra-operative confirmation (histologic examination, rapid parathyroid hormone assay) of the curative potential of the surgical procedure; and, 5) the surgical strategy. Persistent hyperparathyroidism seems to be more frequent after subtotal parathyroidectomy than after total parathyroidectomy with autologous graft of parathyroid tissue. Conversely, recurrent hyperparathyroidism has a similar frequency in the two surgical strategies. To plan further operations, it is very helpful to know all the available data about previous surgery and to undertake accurate identification of the site of recurrence.