Vesivirus 2117: Cell line infectivity range and effectiveness of amplification of a potential adventitious agent in cell culture used for biological production.

Vesivirus 2117 (VV-2117) has been recently described as a contaminant of cell culture operations in several biologics manufacturing facilities. VV-2117 has been poorly studied and little information exists about its biology, pathogenicity and infectivity range in cell culture settings. In this study we evaluated the potential in vitro viral infectivity of VV-2117 using a range of established mammalian cell lines from various species, the effectiveness of virus amplification in CHO-K1 cells at differing infection levels, and the relative sensitivity of two test methods (cytopathic effect [CPE] and polymerase chain reaction [PCR]) to detect infection and viral amplification. Of eight cell culture systems studied, two originating from hamster (CHO-K1 and BHK-21) and one from canine (MDCK) were positive for CPE and also showed a marked increase of viral RNA in a reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) test. CHO-K1 cell cultures inoculated at 10, 1 and 0.1 genome copies per cell (gc/cell) showed both CPE and amplification of VV-2117 RNA, indicating that infection had occurred in these cultures. CHO-K1 cultures inoculated at 0.01, 0.001, 0.0001 and 0.00001 gc per cell showed neither CPE nor VV-2117, indicating that infection had not occurred. Therefore, the minimum dose necessary for infection of CHO-K1 cells was approximately 0.1 genome copies per cell. At any infection level where VV-2117 amplification was observed by RT-qPCR, the cultures also showed CPE. There was no low-level infection that could be detected by RT-qPCR without developing signs of CPE. However, the RT-qPCR assay appeared more sensitive in that it detected VV-2117 infection earlier than the onset of observable CPE.

Antistaphylococcal activity of oritavancin and its synergistic effect in combination with other antimicrobial agents.

Oritavancin exhibited in vitro activity against 169 strains of vancomycin-susceptible, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) with MICs ranging from 0.03 to 1 µg/ml and against vancomycin-intermediate MRSA (VISA; n = 29), heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate MRSA (hVISA; n = 5), and vancomycin-resistant MRSA (n = 5) strains, with MICs ranging from 0.12 to 4 µg/ml. For 10 MRSA isolates comprising 5 VISA and 5 hVISA strains, synergy between oritavancin and gentamicin, linezolid, or rifampin was observed against most of the strains tested using a time-kill method.

Activity of telavancin compared to other agents against coagulase-negative staphylococci with different resistotypes by time kill.

Among 10 coagulase-negative staphylococci, telavancin, quinupristin/dalfopristin, and tigecycline were the most potent antimicrobials. Telavancin exhibited bactericidal effect to 9 strains out of 10 tested at 4× MIC after 24 h of exposure similar to those of vancomycin and daptomycin. By contrast, linezolid was mainly bacteriostatic and teicoplanin was bactericidal to 7 strains tested at 4× MIC after 24 h.

Characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus displaying increased MICs of ceftaroline.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the mechanisms responsible for elevated MICs of ceftaroline for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). METHODS: During the 2008 Assessing Worldwide Antimicrobial Resistance Evaluation ('AWARE') surveillance programme, four S. aureus collected from separate patients in Athens, Greece, demonstrated ceftaroline MICs of 4 mg/L. These isolates were clonally related and one strain (13101) was selected for further characterization. Two strains (4981 and 4977) displaying ceftaroline MICs of 1 and 2 mg/L, respectively, were included for comparison. All strains originated from the same hospital. Penicillin-binding protein (PBP) affinities for ceftaroline and comparators were determined. Strains were typed by single-locus typing (i.e. spa typing), multilocus sequence typing ('MLST') and by multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat fingerprinting (MLVF). The presence of Pantone-Valentine leucocidin and the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec types was assessed. We also performed nucleotide sequencing of the mecA (encoding PBP2a) promoter and ribosomal binding site (rbs) regions and mecR1. RESULTS: Ceftaroline demonstrated the highest PBP2a affinity with strain 4981 (ST5-MRSA-II) (IC(50) 0.06 mg/L; MIC 1 mg/L). Strains 4977 and 13101 (both ST239-MRSA-III) showed indistinguishable MLVF profiles. Ceftaroline PBP2a binding affinity in strains 4977 (IC(50) 0.25 mg/L; MIC 2 mg/L) and 13101 (IC(50) 1 mg/L; MIC 4 mg/L) was 4- and 16-fold lower than 4981, respectively. Strain 4981 contains a wild-type PBP2a, while strains 4977 and 13101 have N(146)K and E(150)K alterations in the non-penicillin-binding domain. Additionally, 13101 has one substitution (H(351)N) in the transpeptidase domain. Alterations in the mecR1, mecA promoter or rbs regions were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Increased ceftaroline MICs were associated with decreased PBP2a binding affinity and reflected alterations in PBP2a.

Activity of ACHN-490 tested alone and in combination with other agents against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

ACHN-490 was tested alone and in combination with cefepime, doripenem, imipenem, or piperacillin-tazobactam in a synergy time-kill analysis against 25 Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains with different resistance phenotypes. Each combination was synergistic against most isolates at 24 h, and antagonism was not observed. Combinations of ACHN-490 with cefepime, doripenem, imipenem, or piperacillin-tazobactam yielded synergies in ≥70% and ≥80% of strains at 6 and 12 h, respectively, and in ≥68% at 24 h.

In vitro activity of fusidic acid (CEM-102, sodium fusidate) against Staphylococcus aureus isolates from cystic fibrosis patients and its effect on the activities of tobramycin and amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia cepacia.

We tested the MICs of fusidic acid (CEM-102) plus other agents against 40 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates from cystic fibrosis patients and the activities of fusidic acid with or without tobramycin or amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, MRSA, and Burkholderia cepacia isolates from cystic fibrosis patients in a 24-h time-kill study. Fusidic acid was potent (MICs, 0.125 to 0.5 µg/ml; a single 500-mg dose of fusidic acid at 8 h averaged 8 to 12. 5 µg/ml with 91 to 97% protein binding) against all MRSA strains. No antagonism was observed; synergy occurred for one MRSA strain treated with fusidic acid plus tobramycin.

Multistep resistance development studies of ceftaroline in gram-positive and -negative bacteria.

Ceftaroline, the active component of the prodrug ceftaroline fosamil, is a novel broad-spectrum cephalosporin with bactericidal activity against Gram-positive and -negative isolates. This study evaluated the potential for ceftaroline and comparator antibiotics to select for clones of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, and Enterococcus faecalis with elevated MICs. S. pneumoniae and S. pyogenes isolates in the present study were highly susceptible to ceftaroline (MIC range, 0.004 to 0.25 µg/ml). No streptococcal strains yielded ceftaroline clones with increased MICs (defined as an increase in MIC of >4-fold) after 50 daily passages. Ceftaroline MICs for H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis were 0.06 to 2 µg/ml for four strains and 8 µg/ml for a ß-lactamase-positive, efflux-positive H. influenzae with a mutation in L22. One H. influenzae clone with an increased ceftaroline MIC (quinolone-resistant, ß-lactamase-positive) was recovered after 20 days. The ceftaroline MIC for this isolate increased 16-fold, from 0.06 to 1 µg/ml. MICs for S. aureus ranged from 0.25 to 1 µg/ml. No S. aureus isolates tested with ceftaroline had clones with increased MIC (>4-fold) after 50 passages. Two E. faecalis isolates tested had ceftaroline MICs increased from 1 to 8 µg/ml after 38 days and from 4 to 32 µg/ml after 41 days, respectively. The parental ceftaroline MIC for the one K. pneumoniae extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-negative isolate tested was 0.5 µg/ml and did not change after 50 daily passages.

Activity of moxifloxacin against intracellular community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: comparison with clindamycin, linezolid and co-trimoxazole and attempt at defining an intracellular susceptibility breakpoint.

BACKGROUND: Co-trimoxazole, clindamycin and linezolid are used to treat community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) infections, but little is known about intracellular activity. Moxifloxacin is active against intracellular methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), but CA-MRSA has not been studied. METHODS: We used 12 clinical CA-MRSA, 1 MSSA overexpressing norA and 2 hospital-acquired MRSA (moxifloxacin MICs: 0.03 to 4 mg/L). Activity was assessed in broth and after phagocytosis by THP-1 macrophages or keratinocytes {concentration-dependent experiments [24 h of incubation] to determine relative potencies [EC(50)], static concentrations [C(s)] and maximal relative efficacies [E(max) (change in log(10) cfu compared with initial inoculum)] and time-dependent experiments [0-72 h] at human C(max)}. RESULTS: Concentration-dependent experiments: in broth, EC(50) and C(s) were correlated with the MIC for all antibiotics, but moxifloxacin achieved significantly (P < 0.01) greater killing (more negative E(max)) than the comparators; and in THP-1 cells and keratinocytes, moxifloxacin acted more slowly but still reached a near bactericidal effect (2 to 3 log(10) cfu decrease) at 24 h with unchanged EC(50) and C(s) as long as its MIC was ≤0.125 mg/L (recursive partitioning analysis). Clindamycin and linezolid were static, and co-trimoxazole was unable to suppress the intracellular growth of CA-MRSA. At human C(max) in broth, moxifloxacin killed more rapidly and more extensively (≥5 log(10) cfu decrease at 10 h) than clindamycin (4 log(10) cfu at 48 h) or co-trimoxazole and linezolid (1-2 log(10) cfu at 72 h). CONCLUSIONS: Moxifloxacin is active against both extracellular and intracellular CA-MRSA if the MIC is low, and is more effective than clindamycin, co-trimoxazole and linezolid.

Molecular and epidemiologic characteristics of linezolid-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci at a tertiary care hospital.

We investigated emergence of linezolid resistance among coagulase-negative staphylococci at our tertiary care center in 2007. All 17 cases were healthcare associated, and prior administration of linezolid was documented

Cellular pharmacodynamics of the novel biaryloxazolidinone radezolid: studies with infected phagocytic and nonphagocytic cells, using Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Listeria monocytogenes, and Legionella pneumophila.

Radezolid is a novel biaryloxazolidinone in clinical development which shows improved activity, including against linezolid-resistant strains. In a companion paper (29), we showed that radezolid accumulates about 11-fold in phagocytic cells, with approximately 60% of the drug localized in the cytosol and approximately 40% in the lysosomes of the cells. The present study examines its activity against (i) bacteria infecting human THP-1 macrophages and located in different subcellular compartments (Listeria monocytogenes, cytosol; Legionella pneumophila, vacuoles; Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis, mainly phagolysosomal), (ii) strains of S. aureus with clinically relevant mechanisms of resistance, and (iii) isogenic linezolid-susceptible and -resistant S. aureus strains infecting a series of phagocytic and nonphagocytic cells. Radezolid accumulated to similar levels ( approximately 10-fold) in all cell types (human keratinocytes, endothelial cells, bronchial epithelial cells, osteoblasts, macrophages, and rat embryo fibroblasts). At equivalent weight concentrations, radezolid proved consistently 10-fold more potent than linezolid in all these models, irrespective of the bacterial species and resistance phenotype or of the cell type infected. This results from its higher intrinsic activity and higher cellular accumulation. Time kill curves showed that radezolid's activity was more rapid than that of linezolid both in broth and in infected macrophages. These data suggest the potential interest of radezolid for recurrent or persistent infections where intracellular foci play a determinant role.

Mutant prevention concentrations of four carbapenems against gram-negative rods.

We tested the propensities of four carbapenems to select for resistant Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii mutants by determining the mutant prevention concentrations (MPCs) for 100 clinical strains with various ss-lactam phenotypes. Among the members of the Enterobacteriaceae family and A. baumannii strains, the MPC/MIC ratios were mostly 2 to 4. In contrast, for P. aeruginosa the MPC/MIC ratios were 4 to > or =16. The MPC/MIC ratios for beta-lactamase-positive K. pneumoniae and E. coli isolates were much higher (range, 4 to >16 microg/ml) than those for ss-lactamase-negative strains.

In vitro activity of CEM-101 against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes with defined macrolide resistance mechanisms.

CEM-101 had MIC ranges of 0.002 to 0.016 microg/ml against macrolide-susceptible pneumococci and 0.004 to 1 microg/ml against macrolide-resistant phenotypes. Only 3 strains with erm(B), with or without mef(A), had CEM-101 MICs of 1 microg/ml, and 218/221 strains had CEM-101 MICs of 64 microg/ml, while 17/19 strains had telithromycin MICs of 4 to 16 microg/ml; CEM-101 MICs were 0.015 to 1 microg/ml. By comparison, erm(A) and mef(A) strains had CEM-101 MICs of 0.015 to 0.5 microg/ml, clindamycin and telithromycin MICs of 64 microg/ml. Pneumococcal multistep resistance studies showed that although CEM-101 yielded clones with higher MICs for all eight strains tested, seven of eight strains had clones with CEM-101 MICs that rose from 0.004 to 0.03 microg/ml (parental strains) to 0.06 to 0.5 microg/ml (resistant clones); for only one erm(B) mef(A) strain with a parental MIC of 1 microg/ml was there a resistant clone with a MIC of 32 microg/ml, with no detectable mutations in the L4, L22, or 23S rRNA sequence. Among two of five S. pyogenes strains tested, CEM-101 MICs rose from 0.03 to 0.25 microg/ml, and only for the one strain with erm(B) did CEM-101 MICs rise from 1 to 8 microg/ml, with no changes occurring in any macrolide resistance determinant. CEM-101 had low MICs as well as low potential for the selection of resistant mutants, independent of bacterial species or resistance phenotypes in pneumococci and S. pyogenes.

Comparative study of the mutant prevention concentrations of moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, and gemifloxacin against pneumococci.

We tested the propensity of three quinolones to select for resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae mutants by determining the mutant prevention concentration (MPC) against 100 clinical strains, some of which harbored mutations in type II topoisomerases. Compared with levofloxacin and gemifloxacin, moxifloxacin had the lowest number of strains with MPCs above the susceptibility breakpoint (P<0.001), thus representing a lower selective pressure for proliferation of resistant mutants. Only moxifloxacin gave a 50% MPC (MPC50) value (1 microg/ml) within the susceptible range.

Activity of telavancin against staphylococci and enterococci determined by MIC and resistance selection studies.

This study used CLSI broth microdilution to test the activity of telavancin and comparator antimicrobial agents against 67 methicillin (meticillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates. Twenty-six vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA) strains were among the isolates tested; all strains were susceptible to telavancin at < or = 1 microg/ml, whereas 12/26 (46%) of these isolates were nonsusceptible to daptomycin at the same concentration. All strains were susceptible to quinupristin-dalfopristin, while resistance was found to all other drugs tested. Telavancin demonstrated potent activity against all vancomycin-susceptible isolates as well as against heterogeneously VISA and VISA resistance phenotypes. In multistep resistance selection studies, telavancin yielded one stable mutant after 43 days in one MRSA strain out of the 10 MRSA strains tested with the MIC rising eightfold from 0.25 microg/ml (parent) to 2 microg/ml. MICs for this clone did not increase further when passages were continued for the maximum 50 days. In contrast, daptomycin selected stable resistant clones (MIC increase of >4x) after 14 to 35 days in 4 of 10 MRSA strains with MICs increasing from 1 to 2 microg/ml (parents) to 4 to 8 microg/ml (resistant clones). Sequencing analysis of daptomycin resistance determinants revealed point mutations in the mprF genes of all four stable daptomycin-resistant clones. Teicoplanin gave rise to resistant clones after 14 to 21 days in 2 of 10 MRSA strains with MICs rising from 1 to 2 microg/ml (parents) to 4 to 16 microg/ml (stable resistant clones). Linezolid selected stable resistant clones after 22 to 48 days in 2 of 10 MRSA strains with MICs rising from 2 to 4 microg/ml (parents) to 32 microg/ml (resistant clones). Vancomycin yielded no resistant clones in 10 MRSA strains tested; however, MICs increased two- to fourfold from 1 to 8 microg/ml to 2 to 16 microg/ml after 50 days. No cross-resistance was found with any clone/antimicrobial combination. The two enterococci developed resistance to daptomycin, and one developed resistance to linezolid. Single-step mutation frequencies for telavancin (<4.0 x 10(-11) to <2.9 x 10(-10) at 2x MIC) were lower than the spontaneous mutation frequencies obtained with the comparators.

Resistance selection studies comparing the activity of razupenem (PTZ601) to vancomycin and linezolid against eight methicillin-resistant and two methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strains.

Multistep and single-step resistance selection studies were performed with razupenem, linezolid, and vancomycin against 10 methicillin (meticillin)-resistant and -susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strains. After 20 daily subcultures, razupenem yielded only clones with MICs of >4 microg/ml in one strain (8 microg/ml) whose parent's MIC was already 4 microg/ml. After 18 to 49 passages in 6/10 strains, razupenem MICs rose from 0.016 to 2 microg/ml (parents) to 0.125 to 8 microg/ml (with clones stable after 10 drug-free subcultures). Single-step mutant selection frequencies were similarly low for razupenem and comparators.

Comparative antipneumococcal activities of sulopenem and other drugs.

For 297 penicillin-susceptible, -intermediate, and -resistant pneumococcal strains, the sulopenem MIC(50)s were 0.008, 0.06, and 0.25, respectively, and the sulopenem MIC(90)s were 0.016, 0.25, and 0.5 microg/ml, respectively. The MIC(50)s of amoxicillin for the corresponding strains were 0.03, 0.25, and 2.0 microg/ml, respectively, and the MIC(90)s were 0.03, 1.0, and 8.0 microg/ml, respectively. The combination of amoxicillin and clavulanate gave MICs similar to those obtained with amoxicillin alone. The sulopenem MICs were similar to those of imipenem and meropenem. The MICs of ss-lactams increased with those of penicillin G, and among the quinolones tested, moxifloxacin had the lowest MICs. Additionally, 45 strains of drug-resistant type 19A pneumococci were tested by agar dilution and gave sulopenem MIC(50)s and MIC(90)s of 1.0 and 2.0 microg/ml, respectively. Both sulopenem and amoxicillin (with and without clavulanate) were bactericidal against all 12 strains tested at 2x MIC after 24 h. Thirty-one strains from 10 countries with various penicillin, amoxicillin, and carbapenems MICs, including those with the highest sulopenem MICs, were selected for sequencing analysis of the pbp1a, pbp2x, and pbp2b regions encoding the transpeptidase active site and MurM. We did not find any correlations between specific penicillin-binding protein-MurM patterns and changes in the MICs.

Antistaphylococcal activity of dihydrophthalazine antifolates, a family of novel antibacterial drugs.

For a panel of 153 Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates (including 13 vancomycin-intermediate or heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate and 4 vancomycin-resistant strains), MIC(50)s and MIC(90)s of three novel dihydrophthalazine antifolates, BAL0030543, BAL0030544, and BAL0030545, were 0.03 and 0.25 microg/ml, respectively, for methicillin-susceptible strains and 0.03 and 128 microg/ml), although rates of endogenous resistance development were much lower for the dihydrophthalazines than for trimethoprim. Single-step platings of naïve staphylococci onto media containing dihydrophthalazine antifolates indicated considerable variability among strains with respect to preexistent subpopulations nonsusceptible to dihydrophthalazine antifolates.

Binding of faropenem and other beta-lactam agents to penicillin-binding proteins of pneumococci with various beta-lactam susceptibilities.

Faropenem demonstrated low MICs (< or = 1 microg/ml) for all penicillin-susceptible and nonsusceptible pneumococci and exhibited very strong abilities to bind to Streptococcus pneumoniae penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs), except for PBP2X. The lower faropenem affinity for PBP2X did not affect MICs for any strains tested, and only imipenem had lower MICs, with much lower binding affinities for all PBPs tested, than faropenem.

In vitro activity of the quinolone WCK 771 against recent U.S. hospital and community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus pathogens with various resistance types.

WCK 771 demonstrated MIC(50) and MIC(90)s of 0.03 and 1 microg/ml, respectively, against 297 recent U.S. community-acquired and hospital strains of Staphylococcus aureus, irrespective of quinolone or glycopeptide resistance. Against quinolone-resistant strains, MIC(90)s of WCK 771 and moxifloxacin were 1 and 16 microg/ml, respectively.

Incidence and characteristics of vancomycin nonsusceptible strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at Hershey Medical Center.

All 982 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains collected from August 2006 to December 2007 were tested for vancomycin susceptibility by using 3-microg/ml vancomycin brain heart infusion screening plates, a vancomycin Etest, and a vancomycin/teicoplanin macro Etest. Three vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) (0.3%) and two heterogeneous VISA (0.2%) isolates were identified. The screening method yielded 895 cases of < or =1 colony and 87 positive results (with growth of >1 colony after 48 h); further Etests showed 82/87 isolates with growth on screening plates to be false positive. Repeat testing showed a false-positivity rate of only 15 of the original 87 isolates by plate screening.